Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

How the UN emboldened Hezbollah terror regime as war with Israel imminent: 'Complete failure'

Published

on


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

JERUSALEM — Nearly nine months of mounting tension between Israel and the radical Islamic Shiite terror group Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon looked set to implode this week after the U.S.-designated terror organization fired hundreds of missiles and rockets into northern Israel and the Israeli military responded with air strikes deeper inside Lebanon. 

As communities on both sides of the border reported widespread damage and destruction, leaders in each country ramped up the rhetoric, with Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah saying Wednesday that «an invasion of the Galilee remains on the table,» and Israel’s Foreign Minister Israel Katz declaring on X: «We are getting very close to the moment of deciding to change the rules of the game against Hezbollah and Lebanon. In an all-out war, Hezbollah will be destroyed, and Lebanon severely beaten.»

The increasing odds of an Israeli-Lebanon war come almost exactly 18 years after the previous round of fighting, and despite the existence of a U.N. Security Council resolution that is meant to preserve calm in the area and provide an international military force to keep the peace.

Advertisement

HEZBOLLAH BIGGER CHALLENGE THAN HAMAS TO ISRAEL: ‘CROWN JEWEL IN THE IRANIAN EMPIRE OF TERROR’

A UNIFIL (the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon) patrol drives past the wreckage of a car that was targeted in an Israeli strike early on March 2 near the southern Lebanese town of Naqoura.  (AFP via Getty Images)

In fact, Resolution 1701 — which was passed by the United Nations Security Council in August 2006 in an attempt to disarm Hezbollah and push it back from Israel’s border — seems to have had the opposite effect, analysts and experts told Fox News Digital this week, with the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) failing to prevent the Iranian-backed group from rearming itself. Some estimate that it may have acquired as many as 150,000 missiles and rockets of various types and ranges since the resolution was passed.

Jonathan Conricus, who previously served as the Israeli military liaison with UNIFIL, as well as the army’s special representative to the U.N., told Fox News Digital that «the whole security architecture of Resolution 1701, its framework, its implementation, and even its mandate, everything is a complete failure.» 

Now a Senior Fellow at the Washington D.C.-based Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD), Conricus said the resolution «failed to prevent the military buildup of Hezbollah and it failed to prevent the conditions for a third Lebanon War, which we now see unfolding.» 

«It is really putting the whole region at risk for a significant war that will be much more severe than what we’re facing with Hamas in Gaza,» he said.

UN Lebanon vote

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Argentinian Ambassador Cesar Mayoral raise their hands to vote at U.N. headquarters in New York City on Aug. 11, 2006. UN Resolution 1701, to halt the fighting in Lebanon and authorize the deployment of 15,000 U.N. peacekeepers to Southern Lebanon, was unanimously passed by the U.N. Security Council. (Stephen Chernin/Getty Images)

Conricus, who also previously served as the Israel Defense Forces’ international media spokesperson, said that Hezbollah had used a combination of «soft» and «hard» power, including directly targeting peacekeepers, to render UNIFIL ineffective in its task of preventing or even reporting the group’s mounting violations to the Security Council. Instead, he said, they «fed the world a distorted picture of the reality on the ground whereby it appeared that the resolution was actually being implemented and that everything was okay.» 

Advertisement

In Israel, military intelligence and local residents have been warning for years that Hezbollah was rearming and moving its forces closer to the border, placing observation posts and even its bright yellow flag in positions that were in clear sight of Israeli communities and army bases. 

ODDS OF ISRAEL-HEZBOLLAH WAR ‘INEVITABLE,’ EXPERTS FEAR: ‘TOTALLY PESSIMISTIC’

Hezbollah fighters

Fighters from the Lebanese terror group Hezbollah carry out a training exercise in Aaramta village in southern Lebanon in May 2023. (AP/Hassan Ammar)

Following the brutal Oct. 7 attack in which thousands of Hamas-led terrorists infiltrated civilian communities in southern Israel — and the regional tensions around the ensuing war in Gaza — Israeli authorities, fearing a similar attack from Hezbollah, decided to evacuate some 80,000 residents from their homes on the border with Lebanon. 

In Lebanon, there have been reports that Israeli airstrikes have damaged or destroyed around 1,700 homes in the southern border region and many civilians there, too, have also been forced to evacuate further to the north as the fighting escalates.   

«We are extremely concerned about the current situation and the potential for the conflict in the Middle East to escalate and widen,» Farhan Aziz Haq, a spokesman for U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, told Fox News Digital. «The Secretary-General has warned that any escalation of the fighting would be a catastrophe for the region.»

Haq said he believed the resolution had been successful in «contributing to over 18 years of relative stability for communities in northern Israel and southern Lebanon.» He also said that the U.N.’s special coordinator for Lebanon, whose role is to mediate between Lebanon and Israel, and the UNIFIL force were still intensively engaged in the area. 

A mural of Hassan Nasrallah with a red background and people cheering in front of it

Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah speaks via a video link during the Shiite holy day of Ashoura in Beirut, Lebanon, on Aug. 9, 2022. (AP Photo/Hussein Malla)

However, Haq said, «ultimately, it is the responsibility of the parties to implement Resolution 1701 and its success depends on the parties to re-commit to its full implementation and immediately return to a cessation of hostilities.» 

Advertisement

UNIFIL, he said, was only there to support this implementation but could not replace the local parties or substitute for a longer-term political process. 

A former member of the peacekeeping force, who spoke to Fox News Digital on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of his position, confirmed that UNIFIL’s role was not to fight and that over the past 18 years it «never interfered with Hezbollah.»

UN WARNED TO STOP GIVING HEZBOLLAH FREE REIN IN LEBANON — OR FACE CONSEQUENCES

Hezbollah-Israel tensions

Firefighters in the Israeli city of Kiryat Shmona battle blazes sparked by Hezbollah rockets and drones on June 3. More than 30 crews worked throughout the night to get wildfires in the Galilee and Golan under control. (Erez Ben Simon/TPS-IL)

«The message was very clear that we needed to step aside whenever Hezbollah started acting,» the former serviceman said, adding that the force even reduced its patrols along the Israel-Lebanon border in order to avoid confrontation.

«UNIFIL is there to observe but will not put its troops in danger,» he said. 

«One could even argue that Hezbollah has benefited from the U.N. presence because they’ve been able to use UNIFIL bases as cover, placing their firing positions nearby,» he said. 

An Israeli official, speaking anonymously in order to comment more broadly on the U.N. and the failure to uphold the 1701 resolution, told Fox News Digital that Israel welcomed the presence of an international peacekeeping force on its northern border, but that the U.N. resolution was never properly implemented and that «from day one, Hezbollah began to rearm.»

Advertisement

«UNIFIL chose not to engage because when it did try to stop Hezbollah, it was attacked,» the official said, emphasizing that Hezbollah did everything but stay out of the area, amassing its terrorists and weapons along the border in plain sight. 

UNIFIL

The Palestinian flag and the flag of Hezbollah wave in the wind on a pole as peacekeepers from the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol the border area between Lebanon and Israel on Hamames hill in the Khiyam area of southern Lebanon on Oct. 13, 2023. (Joseph Eid/AFP via Getty Images)

«The main problem is that the U.N. ignored Hezbollah’s small steps from the beginning and even now, when they are targeting civilians in Israel almost every day, the U.N. continues to ignore [Hezbollah’s] acts of violence,» said the official. 

Michael Horowitz, head of intelligence for Le Beck, a Middle-East-based geopolitical consultancy, told Fox News Digital that «it is obvious to everyone the resolution has failed.»

Horowitz — whose recent book, «Hope and Despair: Israel’s Future in the New Middle East,» looks at Israel’s uncertain place in a region scarred by conflict and insecurity — pointed out that the resolution called «for the establishment of an ‘area free of any armed personnel, assets and weapons’ other than the Lebanese army and UNIFIL, yet not a day has gone by since the resolution was passed 18 years ago that this key requirement was ever met.» 

UN PEACEKEEPING PATROL FILMED COMING UNDER ATTACK BY HEZBOLLAH IN LEBANON

Danny Danon

Former Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon speaking at a U.N. Security Council meeting at U.N. Headquarters in New York on May 15, 2018. Danon had previously warned that UNIFIL was failing to fulfill its mandate. (Hector Retamal/AFP via Getty Images)

«The opposite has happened,» he said. «Hezbollah has maintained and entrenched its presence in southern Lebanon, in the de facto «buffer zone» that Resolution 1701 called for, and even along the border itself.»

UNIFIL, Horowitz added, «has been constantly undermined by Hezbollah, with its forces unable to enter certain areas without facing violence and intimidation by the U.S.-designated terror group.» 

Advertisement

«The only reason there has been 18 years of quiet along that border is because of Israel’s military deterrence, and the fact that neither Israel nor Hezbollah are interested in a conflict,» he said. 

Dr. Eyal Pinko, a senior research fellow at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar Ilan University near Tel Aviv, also said that the 18 years of relative quiet on the Israel-Lebanon border had nothing to do with the U.N. resolution or the international force sent there to enforce it but was due to external factors. 

«Following the Second Lebanon War, which ended in 2006, Hezbollah had to rebuild its forces, receiving support from Iran, that took about seven or eight years,» he said. «Then they became engaged in the civil war in Syria, sending hundreds of troops to help the regime of [President Bashar] Assad — this was their main priority and war with Israel was less relevant.»

Hezbollah members salute at funeral

Hezbollah members salute and raise the group’s yellow flags during the funeral of fallen fighters who were killed in an Israeli strike in Shehabiya in south Lebanon on April 17. (AFP via Getty Images)

After assisting in stabilizing Assad’s position in Syria, Hezbollah faced some economic hardships as its benefactor, Iran, cut back on funding due to sanctions imposed during the Trump administration. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic and a deadly 2020 explosion at Beirut’s main port, which was said to have been at a Hezbollah weapons facility, have left the country’s economy in tatters. 

This week, President Biden’s Special Envoy Amos Hochstein visited the region in an attempt to mediate a diplomatic solution and restore calm before it turns into a full-blown war between the sides. Following a day of meetings with Israeli leaders on Tuesday, he headed to the Lebanese capital, Beirut, where he told journalists in a briefing that the «situation is serious.» 

NETANYAHU SAYS IF HEZBOLLAH LAUNCHES A WAR AGAINST ISRAEL AND INVADES, ‘IT WILL MAKE THE MISTAKE OF ITS LIFE’

Israeli artillery

Israeli soldiers fire a mobile howitzer in the north of Israel, near the border with Lebanon, on Jan. 15. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg)

«We have seen an escalation over the last few weeks, and what President Biden wants to do is to avoid a further escalation to a greater war,» said Hochstein, who in 2022 succeeded in mediating a maritime agreement between the two countries. «That is the effort here. It will take everyone’s interest in ending this conflict now. And we believe that there is a pathway diplomatically to do it. If the sides agree to it.» 

Advertisement

Hochstein, who made no mention of Resolution 1701 or the international UNIFIL force, did not say what the administration believes is the pathway to preventing war and bringing peace to the region.

Jonathan Schanzer, also from the FDD, said Resolution 1701 «has only reinforced the absurdity of the U.N., and its ability to broker peace in the Middle East.» 

«Hezbollah never stopped operating in southern Lebanon,» he said, adding, «If anything, the group has tightened its stranglehold on Lebanon over the last 18 years, and that has enabled the group to stockpile more advanced weapons and prepare the ground for the battle that looms.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Schanzer said that while part of the problem definitely stemmed from the lack of a legitimate mandate for UNIFIL and was also partly due to corruption in the Lebanese Armed Forces, which is supposed to bolster UNIFIL’s work, ultimately «it all tracks back to the U.N.’s inability to acknowledge its own shortcomings and failures.» 

«We all knew the system failed years ago, but the fiction of a functioning apparatus was perpetuated nonetheless,» he said.


Advertisement
Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

¿Quiénes son los hutíes y por qué los atacan EE-UU. e Israel?

Published

on


Durante más de un año, los hutíes, un grupo militante respaldado por Irán que controla el norte de Yemen, han atacado barcos en el Mar Rojo, interrumpiendo gravemente una importante ruta comercial, y han atacado a Israel con drones y misiles.

Combatientes Houthi participan en un desfile para las personas que asistieron a la formación militar Houthi como parte de una campaña de movilización, en Sanaa, Yemen 18 de diciembre 2024. REUTERS/Khaled Abdullah

Este mes, el ritmo de los ataques hutíes contra Israel ha aumentado, al igual que las represalias israelíes.

Durante la semana pasada, los hutíes dijeron que habían lanzado varios ataques contra Israel.

En respuesta, el ejército israelí bombardeó el jueves partes de Yemen, incluido el aeropuerto internacional de la capital, Saná, dejando cuatro personas muertas según el Ministerio de Salud local.

Fue el cuarto ataque de Israel en Yemen durante el año pasado y se produjo solo una semana después del último ataque israelí.

Estados Unidos y Gran Bretaña también han tomado represalias contra los hutíes para proteger las vías fluviales internacionales.

Advertisement

El ejército estadounidense dijo el sábado que había atacado las instalaciones hutíes en Yemen.

Esto es lo que debe saber sobre los hutíes, sus ataques a los barcos y su conflicto con Israel.

¿Quiénes son los hutíes?

Los hutíes, militantes chiítas que llevan dos décadas combatiendo al gobierno de Yemen, tomaron Saná en 2014, obligando al gobierno internacionalmente reconocido del país a huir a la ciudad de Adén, en el sur del país.

Una coalición liderada por Arabia Saudita lanzó una intervención militar para expulsar a los militantes, pero fracasó, y los hutíes se quedaron en el poder en el norte de Yemen, donde gobernaron a la mayor parte de la población y provocaron una guerra civil que ha matado a cientos de miles de personas y ha provocado una de las peores crisis humanitarias del mundo.

Los hutíes han construido su ideología en torno a la oposición a Israel y Estados Unidos, y se consideran parte del “eje de resistencia” liderado por Irán, junto con Hamás en la Franja de Gaza y Hezbolá en el Líbano.

Su ideología se refleja en el lema de la bandera del grupo:

Advertisement

“Alá es grande, muerte a Estados Unidos, muerte a Israel, malditos los judíos, victoria al Islam”.

Sus líderes suelen establecer paralelismos entre las bombas de fabricación estadounidense que se utilizan para bombardear a sus fuerzas en Yemen y las armas enviadas a Israel y utilizadas en Gaza.

Las conversaciones entre los hutíes y Arabia Saudita en la capital saudí, Riad, en septiembre de 2023 generaron esperanzas de un acuerdo de paz que potencialmente reconocería el derecho de los hutíes a gobernar el norte de Yemen.

En diciembre de 2023, las Naciones Unidas anunciaron que las partes en conflicto habían acordado una hoja de ruta para la paz, pero el progreso se congeló poco después cuando el gobierno yemení reconocido internacionalmente, respaldado por Arabia Saudita, dijo que suspendía la implementación del acuerdo, citando la escalada de los hutíes en el Mar Rojo.

Los hutíes, que alguna vez fueron un grupo de rebeldes mal organizados, en los últimos años han reforzado su arsenal, que ahora incluye misiles de crucero y balísticos y drones de largo alcance.

Los analistas atribuyen esta expansión al apoyo de Irán, que ha suministrado milicias en todo Oriente Medio.

¿Considera Estados Unidos a los hutíes un grupo terrorista?

Advertisement

La administración Trump etiquetó inicialmente a los hutíes como una organización terrorista en 2021, poco antes de que el expresidente Donald Trump dejara el cargo.

La administración Biden levantó la designación semanas después para facilitar la entrada de ayuda humanitaria en Yemen.

A principios de este año, el Departamento de Estado anunció que iba a volver a imponer la etiqueta en vista de los ataques de los hutíes a los barcos.

La designación de terrorista permite a Washington imponer sanciones financieras y procesar penalmente a cualquiera que proporcione a sabiendas «apoyo material» a un grupo etiquetado, y el Departamento del Tesoro ha estado tratando de presionar a los hutíes cortándoles la financiación y los suministros.

¿Por qué atacan a los barcos?

Semanas después de que los militantes de Hamás atacaran el sur de Israel el 7 de octubre de 2023, lo que llevó a Israel a desatar una devastadora campaña militar en Gaza, los hutíes, en solidaridad con Hamás, dijeron que atacarían cualquier barco que viajara hacia o saliera de Israel y dijeron que habían lanzado drones y misiles contra Israel.

Un barco incautado, el Galaxy Leader, frente a la costa yemení en diciembre. Foto Khaled Abdullah/ReutersUn barco incautado, el Galaxy Leader, frente a la costa yemení en diciembre. Foto Khaled Abdullah/Reuters

Pero los criterios hutíes para atacar a los barcos se ampliaron rápidamente para incluir a los buques con vínculos directos o indirectos con Israel o visitas anteriores a puertos israelíes, luego también a los barcos con vínculos con Estados Unidos o Gran Bretaña, y desde entonces los hutíes han ampliado la categoría varias veces.

Los hutíes han lanzado más de 130 ataques con drones y misiles contra buques en el Mar Rojo y el Golfo de Adén, según Armed Conflict Location and Event Data, un grupo sin fines de lucro que rastrea los ataques.

Advertisement

Quizás la operación hutí más audaz se produjo en noviembre de 2023, cuando hombres armados secuestraron un buque llamado Galaxy Leader y lo llevaron a un puerto yemení, donde han mantenido cautivos a los miembros de la tripulación del barco durante más de un año.

En agosto, un ataque hutí a un petrolero que transportaba el equivalente a alrededor de 1 millón de barriles de petróleo crudo amenazó con convertirse en un desastre ambiental mientras el buque ardía durante semanas. Finalmente fue remolcado a un lugar seguro.

¿Cómo están afectando los ataques a los países de todo el mundo?

Para viajar entre Asia y Europa, las compañías navieras globales han navegado durante décadas por el Mar Rojo y el Canal de Suez.

Ahora, muchas navieras están desviando su carga por el Cabo de Buena Esperanza, en el extremo sur de África, una ruta que suma miles de kilómetros y 10 días a las rutas de navegación y requiere más combustible.

Por lo tanto, los ataques hutíes han aumentado significativamente los costos y los riesgos del transporte de mercancías, lo que contribuye a que los precios de los productos sean más altos en todo el mundo, según los economistas; picos de precios que influyeron en las elecciones en Europa y Estados Unidos.

El costo de enviar un contenedor desde Asia al norte de Europa ha aumentado un 270% en 12 meses, según Freightos, un mercado digital para envíos.

Advertisement

Pero seguir utilizando el Mar Rojo aumentaría las primas de seguros y pondría en peligro a los marineros, algunos de los cuales han muerto o han sido secuestrados en los ataques.

¿Qué ha estado haciendo Estados Unidos para detener los ataques?

El gobierno de Biden ha creado una fuerza de tarea naval, llamada Operación Guardián de la Prosperidad, que incluye a Estados Unidos, Gran Bretaña y otros aliados y que ha estado patrullando el Mar Rojo para, en palabras del Secretario de Estado Antony Blinken, “preservar la libertad de navegación” y “libertad de transporte marítimo”.

Los buques de guerra estadounidenses y británicos han interceptado algunos misiles y drones hutíes antes de que alcanzaran sus objetivos.

En la primera mitad de este año, los dos países llevaron a cabo al menos cinco ataques conjuntos contra los hutíes.

¿Qué ha señalado Israel que hará?

El jueves, después de que Israel atacara Yemen por segunda vez este mes, el primer ministro Benjamin Netanyahu dijo en una entrevista con los medios de comunicación locales que Israel “apenas estaba empezando” a responder a los hutíes.

Advertisement

Israel Katz, el ministro de Defensa, reiteró el jueves una amenaza que había hecho anteriormente sobre la intención de Israel de asesinar a los líderes hutíes.

Daremos caza a todos los líderes hutíes, los atacaremos como lo hemos hecho en otros lugares”, dijo Katz. “Nadie podrá escapar del largo brazo de Israel”.

Aparentemente, Israel está prestando más atención a los hutíes ahora, después de alcanzar un acuerdo de alto el fuego con Hezbollah el mes pasado y socavar en gran medida las capacidades de Hamás en Gaza durante más de un año de guerra.

En respuesta al ataque de Israel, Mohammed Abdulsalam, un portavoz hutí, dijo que atacar la infraestructura civil era “un crimen sionista contra todo el pueblo yemení”.

Agregó que los ataques israelíes no “disuadirán a Yemen de apoyar a Gaza”.

c.2024 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias

Copyright © 2024 - NDM Noticias del Momento - #Noticias #Chimentos #Politica #Fútbol #Economia #Sociedad