INTERNACIONAL
Liberal Supreme Court justices grill religious institution in landmark school choice case

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments in a case involving the nation’s first religious charter schools, and whether it is eligible for state funding despite its religious teachings.
At issue in the case is a virtual Catholic charter school in Oklahoma, St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, and whether the school is eligible to receive public funding because of its religious teachings. Lawyers representing the school have argued that it is operating like a private actor working under a contract with the state, and asked the high court on Wednesday to overturn an earlier decision by the Oklahoma Supreme Court.
During Wednesday’s arguments, lawyers for St. Isidore argued that just because they receive state funding does not mean they are a state actor. They also noted recent Supreme Court precedent, which they said has been in their favor.
This Court has «‘repeatedly’ held that ‘a State violates the Free Exercise Clause when it excludes religious observers from otherwise available public benefits,» James Campbell, attorney for St. Isidore, told the court.
100 DAYS OF INJUNCTIONS, TRIALS AND ‘TEFLON DON’: TRUMP SECOND TERM MEETS ITS BIGGEST TESTS IN COURT
A view of the U.S. Supreme Court Building. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Justices used oral arguments to press Campbell on how they would treat individuals with different religious backgrounds.
«What would you do with a charter school that doesn’t want to teach evolution, or it doesn’t want to teach history, including the history of slavery, or it doesn’t want to include having children of another faith. In them, as this one does?» Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked Campbell.
«This one does not say it won’t exclude children of other faiths. But it said, if you want to attend this school, you have to attend mass. You have to accept the teachings of the church with respect to certain principles. So is that something you look at?»
In response, Campbell notes that the school does not require students to affirm its religious beliefs, noting that St. Isidore «allows exceptions for anyone that doesn’t want to attend mass,» and says «point blank» in its handbook that there is no requirement that a student affirm the beliefs of the school.»
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ASKS SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW EL SALVADOR DEPORTATION FLIGHT CASE

Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor during the formal group photograph at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC, US, on Friday, Oct. 7, 2022. (Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
The Oklahoma Statewide Virtual Charter School Board approved St. Isidore’s contract request in June 2023, making them eligible to receive public funds.
But its ability to receive state funds was later blocked by the Oklahoma Supreme Court, which ruled that the public funding for the school was in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
Oklahoma Attorney General, Gentner Drummond, has argued that the school would be a state actor if it received state funding. «Charter schools no doubt offer important educational innovations, but they bear all the classic indicia of public schools,» Drummond argued in an earlier Supreme Court filing.
If its «charter-school law violates the Free Exercise Clause, then this is one of the most far-reaching free exercise violations in the Nation’s history,» he argued.

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The court’s decision here could have wide-ranging ramifications far beyond Oklahoma. More than 40 U.S. states currently authorize charter schools, and the ruling in the case could have ripple effects across the country.
The charter school states outright on its site that it «fully embraces» the teachings of the Catholic Church, «fully incorporates» them «into every aspect» of the curriculum— and that it intends to participate «in the evangelizing mission of the church.»
This is a breaking news story. Check back soon for updates. Fox News’s Anders Hagstrom contributed to this report.
Supreme Court,Donald Trump,Politics,US Faith & Values,US Education
INTERNACIONAL
Flotilla a Gaza: todas las miradas convergen sobre los 55 barcos con 630 personas que se acercan a la zona de riesgo

Las miradas del mundo convergen sobre la Flotilla Global Sumud, que avanza desarmada hacia las aguas territoriales de Gaza para consignar ayuda a los palestinos. Siguen navegando 44 barcos que llevan a bordo alrededor de 630 personas, entre ellos varios parlamentarios italianos y figuras como la sueca Greta Thunberg y un nieto de Nelson Mandela.
La ansiedad crece, mientras se activan todos los sistemas de comunicaciones y algunos de los viajeros confiesan que no duermen de noche. «Tememos que nos vuelvan a atacar como hace cinco días, lo que obligó a retirarse a nuestro barco principal”.
Video
El curso de la flotilla internacional con ayuda para Gaza
La más grande de las dos naves de guerra italianas que siguen a la Flotilla le hará de escolta hasta las 120 millas marítimas de distancia de Gaza. Después se retirará y la Flotilla quedará completamente a merced de los militares israelíes.
El ministro de Defensa, Guido Crosetto, dijo que “doy por descontado que los activistas serán arrestados”. “Pondría la firma para que suceda solo esto, sin ningún tipo de consecuencias.”
En uno de sus últimos posteos en la cuenta oficial de Instagram, la Flotilla marcó su ubicación y reclamó «un paso seguro».
«El fracaso de los gobiernos ha obligado a la ciudadanía a asumir riesgos extraordinarios simplemente para cumplir con sus obligaciones legales y morales: entregar ayuda humanitaria y abrir un corredor marítimo tan necesario. El asedio mortífero impuesto a Gaza desde 2007 ha devastado todos los ámbitos de la vida. Hoy, la situación es catastrófica. Como mínimo, los gobiernos deben exigir un paso seguro para esta misión legal y, sobre todo, vital», escribieron.
Uno de los viajeros confiesa al “Corriere della Sera” en una comunicación que “tengo una ‘fifa’ (miedo) negra. El ataque con los drones israelíes el 23 de septiembre fue espantoso y estamos ahora por pasar la llamada línea de riesgo. Soy un no violento».
El activista pilotea el barco a vela Morgana que hospeda también al senador Marco Moratti y la europarlamentaria de Verdes e Izquierda, Benedetta Scuderi.
Los que dialogan con la prensa no niegan que algunos han partido de regreso, pero se dan ánimo para seguir. El lunes comenzaron a practicar simulaciones de los escenarios que podrían enfrentar.
En 2010, en la “zona de riesgo” a más de cien millas de las aguas territoriales, soldados israelíes atacaron una Flotilla que transportaba también vituallas para los palestinos de Gaza. Diez voluntarios que estaban en la nave principal murieron y nueve soldados de Israel resultaron heridos.
Irene Soldatti, de 40 años, de Bolonia, que navega en la nave “Aurora”, uno de los barcos más grandes, dijo a la prensa que “queremos encender una mecha de paz, no de guerra”. “Lo único que tenemos es el cuerpo”.
La variante más tranquilizadora es que una vez capturados, los que viajan en la Flotilla serán arrestados y procesados.
La intervención israelí se produciría entre las 100 y 120 millas náuticas (entre 185 y 222 km) de las aguas territoriales.
Nadie confirma nada, pero la primera ministra Giorgia Meloni habló por teléfono del tema al presidente Donald Trump y le pidió su colaboración para evitar un final sangriento.
“Debemos asegurarnos que no haya consecuencias letales”, insistió el ministro de Defensa Guido Crosetto, que recibió a representantes del Movimiento Global en Gaza.
También se habría pedido una intervención al presidente de Israel, Isaac Herzog, amigo de Italia que estuvo hace poco en Roma por una entrevista con el Papa.
También el pontífice está moviendo los hilos diplomáticos de la Iglesia para convencer a los israelíes de asegurarse que no haya víctimas cuando los soldados israelíes asalten los barcos. Se espera una intervención pública de León XIV en cualquier momento para evitar un choque sangriento.
El lunes, 18 parlamentarios de Estados Unidos pidieron a su gobierno que garantice la seguridad de los civiles a bordo de la Global Sumud Flotilla. Es el nombre internacional de la Flotilla. La palabra “Sumud” significa resistencia, resiliencia.
“La amenaza de violencia por parte de Israel planea sobre el viaje”, señala el mensaje de los parlamentarios de Estados Unidos.
Los 18 legisladores norteamericanos revelaron que a bordo de las naves de la flotilla viajan 24 ciudadanos estadounidenses.
La Flotilla informó este martes que se aproxima a la zona de alto riesgo “donde anteriormente se interceptaron otras flotillas”.
“En este punto, la vigilancia y la solidaridad internacionales son más necesarias que nunca”.
INTERNACIONAL
Israeli diplomat blasts ‘staged walkout’ ahead of Netanyahu speech, talks holiday scheduling controversy

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Israel’s top diplomat at the United Nations dismissed delegates who walked out before Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address and blasted the international body for holding key Middle East talks during a Jewish holiday, leaving Jerusalem’s delegation without representation.
«It was a staged walkout. Most of the people were not diplomats. They were staffers from hostile missions,» Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon told Fox News Digital.
He noted that Netanyahu was the first speaker of the day, meaning the diplomats who stormed out of the hall arrived only to participate in the walkout.
«I told them, ‘get out and don’t come back,’ and I meant it. If they cannot listen to the words of the prime minister representing Israel and the Jewish people, I don’t think they have a place in this hall,» he said.
UN DELEGATES WALK OUT OF NETANYAHU ADDRESS AFTER CHEERING PALESTINIAN LEADER DAY BEFORE
Delegations walk out as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) at U.N. headquarters in New York City on Sept. 26, 2025. (Shannon Stapleton/Reuters)
Danon added that most delegations stayed in the room and respected both Netanyahu and the state of Israel.
Netanyahu may have been speaking to a smaller audience within the hall, but his address was broadcast on speakers in Gaza and on Gazans’ cell phones, something the prime minister revealed while on stage. Danon said that the prime minister would often consider how to carry the message and the «brilliant idea» of broadcasting it so that the Palestinians could hear his speech was an extension of that.
Danon told Fox News Digital that Netanyahu’s address was not directed at Hamas leaders, who, he argued, «don’t care» and only understand the language of tanks and aircraft. Instead, he said, the message was meant for the people of Gaza and for the hostages who have been languishing in the enclave for nearly two years.
Danon also lamented that the U.N. scheduled key talks on the Middle East during the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah.
«They had a discussion about the Middle East, about Israel, without Israel. I think it shows the hypocrisy of the United Nations,» Danon told Fox News Digital. «Some leaders care more about hearing themselves rather than actually rewarding a dialogue.»

Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at the 80th session of The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on Sept. 26, 2025, in New York City. (Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images)
ISRAEL CALLS UN PUSH FOR PALESTINE STATEHOOD A ‘CHARADE,’ WARNS OF ‘CONSEQUENCES’ FOR RECOGNITION MOVES
Danon said that he spoke to the head of the U.N. Security Council about rescheduling the discussion but was not successful in getting the date changed. It is unclear which delegation was at the helm of the council, as it rotates monthly.
While Israel was not able to participate in talks during Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, it remained one of the central issues of the 80th session of the U.N. General Assembly. Israel also faced pressure outside official U.N. discussions, with several delegations moving to recognize a Palestinian state.
Danon dismissed the declarations of France, Australia, the United Kingdom and Canada recognizing Palestinian statehood as «empty.»
«We spoke with many delegations. Without naming names, we had successes that a few countries did not join this circus, those empty declarations, and we are grateful for that,» Danon said. He added that he believes «overall everybody knows that it’s not going anywhere.»

Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon speaks to members of the media before the U.N. Security Council meeting on Oct. 2, 2024. (REUTERS/Stephani Spindel)
NETANYAHU BROADCASTS UNITED NATIONS MESSAGE INTO GAZA ACCUSING WORLD LEADERS OF APPEASING ‘EVIL’
When asked why some delegations were so intent on recognition, he chalked it up to leaders needing domestic wins and using the Middle East conflict to galvanize supporters.
«I think they have domestic interests. Take, for example, President Macron. He has so many domestic problems and issues with the economy, with immigration, with the parliament. So, it’s easier for him to come to the U.N. and to pretend that he’s actually leading something. He knows better than that,» Danon said.

President Donald Trump hosted Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu at the White House as the pair looked to reach a peace deal in the Gaza war. ( Win McNamee/Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
On Monday, after meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House, Netanyahu accepted a U.S.-backed Gaza deal to end the nearly two-year-long war. French President Emmanuel Macron, who recognized a Palestinian state last week, said that he welcomed the plan and expected Israel to «engage resolutely on this basis.» He added that «Hamas has no choice but to immediately release all hostages and follow this plan.»
It remains to be seen whether Hamas will accept the deal and, if it does, whether it will stick to the terms.
israel,united nations,middle east
INTERNACIONAL
Trump admin renews effort to exclude Harvard from billions in federal research grants

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Trump administration on Monday said it has started a new process to block Harvard University’s eligibility for federal grant money and its ability to enter into new federal contracts — yet another salvo from Trump officials as they continue to target the nation’s oldest and wealthiest university.
The Department of Health and Human Services notified Harvard President Alan Garber in a letter Monday that it has initiated the debarment process for the university — a move that would render the school ineligible to receive federal grant money or enter into new federal contracts.
HHS officials cited allegations of antisemitism brought against the university and what Trump officials argued is the school’s failure to comply with recommendations from a federal antisemitism task force earlier this year.
FEDERAL JUDGE BLOCKS TRUMP ATTEMPT TO FREEZE MORE THAN $2 BILLION IN HARVARD FUNDS
Harvard President Alan Garber addresses the crowd during the university’s 373rd commencement ceremony. (Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
The familiar refrain has been at the center of a months-long legal fight between Trump officials and Harvard lawyers, who sparred over efforts to comply with recommendations from a federal task force earlier this year.
Trump officials have argued the school has not done enough to comply with the task force recommendations; Harvard has countered that the effort amounts to an unconstitutional «pressure campaign» from the administration to influence and exert control over its academic programs.
It’s unclear how long the debarment process will take, and these efforts are often preceded by a shorter-term period of suspension, according to data from HHS’s Office for Civil Rights.
Still, if successful, the effort could threaten billions of dollars in funding for Harvard at an already vulnerable time for the university.
The debarment process, if successful, could eventually «blacklist» Harvard from doing business with the government in any capacity — including blocking its ability to accept billions in federal research funds and to sign new contracts with federal agencies.
CONTINUED COURT FIGHTS COULD PUT HARVARD IN UNWINNABLE POSITION VS TRUMP

Graduates celebrate during Harvard University’s 374th commencement ceremony on May 29, 2025. (Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
Harvard’s lawyers have reportedly struggled to negotiate with the Trump administration in ongoing settlement talks, weeks after a judge in Boston sided with Harvard and ordered the administration to restore billions in funding to the school.
The news comes just weeks after a federal judge in Boston sided with Harvard in ruling that the Trump administration had acted illegally in freezing more than $2.2 billion in federal research funding that had been allocated to Harvard.
In an 84-page summary judgment earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs rejected the Trump administration’s assertion that it was attempting to strip Harvard of billions in federal funding due to allegations of antisemitism, or the university’s failure to comply with the recommendations of a federal antisemitism task force.
«A review of the administrative record makes it difficult to conclude anything other than that defendants used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country’s premier universities,» Burroughs said in her decision.
HARVARD PRESIDENT SAYS HE HAS ‘NO CHOICE’ BUT TO FIGHT TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

Hundreds of graduates walk out of Harvard’s 2024 commencement in Harvard Yard to call attention to the plight of Palestinians on May 23, 2024, in Cambridge, Mass. (Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
Harvard lawyers sued the Trump administration in April over its attempts to freeze billions in federal funding and block other grant money — which they argued in court amounts to an unconstitutional «pressure campaign» designed to influence and exert control over its academic programs.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The New York Times reported that the Trump administration is likely to appeal the ruling, though the time frame for the appeal and the next steps for challenging the summary judgment remain unclear.
politics,donald trump,white house,national security,education,federal courts
- POLITICA3 días ago
Francos apuntó al gobierno de Kicillof por el triple femicidio narco: “¿Qué dirá la gente que votó a Magario?»
- POLITICA2 días ago
Emilia Orozco: “Si vuelve el kirchnerismo, todo el esfuerzo que hicieron los argentinos se va a tirar a la basura”
- POLITICA3 días ago
Ciudad vs. provincia. Los recelos y los negocios que reveló el triple crimen de Florencio Varela