Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Linda McMahon blasts Harvard in scathing letter telling elite university it will no longer get federal grants

Published

on


Secretary of Education Linda McMahon sent a scathing letter to Harvard University President Alan Garber on Monday, not only blasting the Massachusetts Ivy League school’s handling of antisemitism on campus but also advising school officials to refrain from applying for future federal grants because they will not «be provided.»

In her no-holds-barred letter, McMahon told Garber that the federal government has a «sacred responsibility» to be an important steward of American taxpayer funds, adding that the school has amassed a largely tax-free $53.2 billion endowment and receives billions of dollars in taxpayer funds each year.

Advertisement

«Receiving such taxpayer funds is a privilege, not a right,» she wrote. «Yet instead of using these funds to advance the education of its students, Harvard is engaging in a systemic pattern of violating federal law. Where do many of these ‘students’ come from, who are they, how do they get into Harvard, or even into our country – and why is there so much HATE? These are questions that must be answered, among many more, but the biggest question of all is, why will Harvard not give straightforward answers to the American public?»

She also said the university has «made a mockery» of the higher education system in the U.S., inviting foreign students to its campuses who engage in violent behavior and show contempt for the U.S.

TRUMP SAYS HE’LL REVOKE HARVARD’S TAX-EXEMPT STATUS

Advertisement

Department of Education Secretary Linda McMahon sent a scathing letter to Harvard University President Alan Garber, advising him to not apply for federal grants because they will not be provided. (Getty Images)

McMahon slammed the school for adopting an «embarrassing» remedial math program for undergraduates, questioning why a school that’s so difficult to get admitted to has to teach low-level mathematics.

She called Harvard out for being embroiled in plagiarism scandals and lambasted the school for allowing Harvard University and the Harvard Law Review to engage in «ugly racism.»

Advertisement

McMahon blasted Harvard for hiring former Mayors Bill de Blasio of New York City and Lori Lightfoot of Chicago to teach «leadership» at its School of Public Health.

«This is like hiring the captain of the Titanic to teach navigation to future captains of the sea,» she said.

IVY LEAGUE SUICIDES, PRINCETON’S 8TH STUDENT DEATH IN 4 YEARS EXPOSE CRISIS AT ELITE SCHOOLS

Advertisement

«The above concerns are only a fraction of the long list of Harvard’s consistent violations of its own legal duties. Given these and other concerning allegations, this letter is to inform you that Harvard should no longer seek GRANTS from the federal government, since none will be provided,» McMahon later wrote. «Harvard will cease to be a publicly funded institution and can instead operate as a privately-funded institution, drawing on its colossal endowment, and raising money from its large base of wealthy alumni.

«You have an approximately $53 billion head start, much of which was made possible by the fact that you are living within the walls of, and benefiting from, the prosperity secured by the United States of America and its free-market system you teach your students to despise,» she added.

In closing, McMahon reminded Garber that the Trump administration had been willing to maintain federal funding to Harvard as long as the school complied with federal law to protect and promote student welfare and stop racial preferencing.

Advertisement

HARVARD PRESIDENT APOLOGIZES FOR FAILURE TO ADDRESS ANTISEMITISM, ISLAMOPHOBIA AFTER NEW REPORTS RELEASED

Alan Garber on NBC News

Harvard President Alan Garber (Screenshot/NBC)

«The proposed common-sense reforms – which the Administration remains committed to – include a return to merit-based admissions and hiring, an end to unlawful programs that promote crude identity stereotypes, disciplinary reform and consistent accountability, including for student groups, cooperation with Law Enforcement, and reporting compliance with the Department of Education, Department of Homeland Security, and other Federal Agencies,» McMahon said. «The Administration’s priorities have not changed, and today’s letter marks the end of new grants for the university.»

Harvard confirmed to Fox News Digital that it received a letter from the administration on Monday.

Advertisement

«Today, we received another letter from the administration doubling down on demands that would impose unprecedented and improper control over Harvard University and would have chilling implications for higher education,» a Harvard spokesperson said. «Today’s letter makes new threats to illegally withhold funding for lifesaving research and innovation in retaliation against Harvard for filing its lawsuit on April 21.

«Harvard will continue to comply with the law, promote and encourage respect for viewpoint diversity, and combat antisemitism in our community. Harvard will also continue to defend against illegal government overreach aimed at stifling research and innovation that make Americans safer and more secure,» the spokesperson continued.

TRUMP BRANDS HARVARD ‘ANTISEMITIC’ AND A ‘THREAT TO DEMOCRACY’ DURING FUNDING BATTLE

Advertisement
President Donald Trump with Linda McMahon in the Oval office

President Donald Trump holds an executive order relating to education in the Oval Office on April 23, 2025. (AP NEWSROOM)

McMahon’s letter comes just days after President Donald Trump declared that his administration was going to be taking away Harvard’s tax-exempt status.

Trump made the announcement after Fox News reported that his administration asked the Internal Revenue Service to revoke Harvard University’s tax-exempt status. The Ivy League school’s failure to address antisemitism on campus is grounds for losing its 501(c)(3) status, sources said at the time.

Trump argued in mid-April that Harvard had «lost its way» and didn’t deserve federal funding.

Advertisement

«Harvard has been hiring almost all woke, Radical Left, idiots and ‘birdbrains’ who are only capable of teaching FAILURE to students and so-called ‘future leaders,’» Trump wrote on Truth Social. «Look just to the recent past at their plagiarizing President, who so greatly embarrassed Harvard before the United States Congress.»

Harvard has become a target of Trump’s broader crackdown on universities, much of which is in response to last year’s anti-Israel unrest that erupted on campuses across the country.

On April 11, the Trump administration sent a letter to Garber and Harvard Corporation Lead Member Penny Pritzker outlining the institution’s failures and a list of demands from the White House. In the letter, the administration accused Harvard of failing to uphold civil rights laws and to foster an «environment that produces intellectual creativity.»

Advertisement

The Trump administration threatened to pull federal funding if Harvard did not reform governance and leadership as well as its hiring and admissions practices by August 2025. The letter emphasized the need for Harvard to change its international admissions process to avoid admitting students who are «hostile» to American values or support terrorism or antisemitism. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Harvard refused to comply with the demands, with Garber saying that «no government… should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.»

Advertisement

The Trump administration then froze $2.2 billion in funding to Harvard and is reportedly looking to slash another billion, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The university later filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its «unlawful» freezing of funds.

Fox News’ Greg Norman, Andrea Margolis, Alexis McAdams and Rachel Wolf contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Donald Trump,Massachusetts,College,Dept of Education

INTERNACIONAL

Iran deploys explosive ‘suicide skiffs’ disguised as fishing boats in Strait of Hormuz

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Iran is deploying explosive-laden drone boats disguised as wooden fishing vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, a defense expert has warned — a move that signals a new phase of hybrid maritime warfare in one of the world’s most critical shipping lanes.

Advertisement

Cameron Chell, CEO of drone technology firm Draganfly, spoke after the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) confirmed that a Marshall Islands–flagged oil tanker was struck March 1 by an Iranian unmanned surface vehicle north of Muscat, Oman.

«UKMTO has received confirmation that the vessel was attacked by an uncrewed surface vehicle (USV), and that the crew has been evacuated to shore,» UKMTO said in a threat assessment.

Reports also indicated that two additional oil tankers were hit March 11 by remote-controlled explosive boats in the Gulf, as Iran intensified attacks on foreign vessels following the start of the U.S. Operation Epic Fury against the regime on Feb. 28.

Advertisement

FIRES RAGE AT IRAN’S BANDAR ABBAS NAVAL HEADQUARTERS, STRAIT OF HORMUZ TRAFFIC STALLED

Persian Gulf shipping dips as Trump positions military against Iran. ( Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

The use of so-called «suicide skiffs» represents a growing asymmetric threat in the narrow, 21-mile-wide Strait, Chell warned, while highlighting the technological capabilities behind these attacks.

Advertisement

«The Iranians probably have use of radio remote control, line of sight, frequency hopping, or encrypted radio communication between the skiffs and the Hormuz shoreline,» Chell told Fox News Digital.

«These can be jammed and tracked, but when there’s 50 of these boats, it’s hard to try to find them all along this shoreline or to find a 20-foot wooden fishing boat that is laden with explosives.

«They can have one person controlling a swarm of 10 boats,» he said before describing how there «could also be autonomous swarming where they might have 10 boats that can act with a large level of independence, because they’re pre-programmed.»

Advertisement

«The boats would be used to ram into targets and explode,» Chell clarified.

EX-NAVY SEAL WARNS WITHDRAWING FROM IRAN NOW WOULD HAND ‘VICTORY’ TO REGIME

Warships maneuver off the coast of southern Iran during a joint maritime exercise.

Naval units from Iran and Russia simulate the rescue of a hijacked vessel during joint drills at the Port of Bandar Abbas in Hormozgan, Iran, on Feb. 19, 2026. (Iranian Army/Handout/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Chell’s comments followed a March 12 Reuters report stating that six vessels had been attacked in the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz. 

Advertisement

Sources said that Iran had also deployed about a dozen mines, complicating efforts to maintain any traffic through the critical waterway.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Sky News Thursday that the U.S. Navy, potentially alongside an international coalition, would escort ships when militarily feasible.

U.K. Defense Secretary John Healey also said discussions were underway with European counterparts stressing the global economic stakes tied to the strait. Chell, however, questioned current defensive readiness.

Advertisement

«The drone defense fleets that the U.S. Navy would not have been set up to take these suicide skiffs out,» Chell said.

«The U.S. would be using manned aircraft in order to take them out, which are fantastic at taking out a large target, but inefficient in taking out 50 boats at one time that are an average of 25 or 30 feet in size, laden with explosives.

IRAN’S DRONE SWARMS CHALLENGE US AIR DEFENSES AS TROOPS IN MIDDLE EAST FACE RISING THREATS

Advertisement
A screenshot of a marine traffic terminal showing vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.

A screenshot of a marine traffic terminal showing vessels in the Strait of Hormuz on March 4, 2026. (Kpler/Marine Traffic)

«Given the Strait’s geography, it would require patrolling by many aircraft and would require pervasive surveillance over the area, a rapid response to any activity that’s happening,» he said.

As Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei vowed to keep the Strait closed as leverage against the U.S. and Israel, oil prices continue to surge, with Chell also highlighting the geographic advantage Iran holds.

«The geographic layout of the Strait lends itself very well to relatively unsophisticated suicide skiffs, unmanned surface vehicles or USVs,» he warned before describing how the area «lends itself to this low-cost, automatic, asymmetric warfare.»

Advertisement

«The Iranians can disguise them as fishing boats and can be anywhere from 12 to 30 feet, and a boat could be of any description,» Chell said.

«These skiffs are equipped with basic remote control capabilities that may or may not be using GPS waypoints or manual remote control.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«The skiffs are not autonomous, because the distance across the Strait is so short, and it’s very flat across this waterway, the communication signal could be carried for quite some time via a line of sight,» he added.

«They could literally have hundreds out there at a time, because they’re also so inexpensive to defend against,» Chell said.

Advertisement



war with iran,iran,mojtaba khamenei,us navy,military,wars

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Hegseth announces Pentagon probe into deadly strike on Iranian school

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Pentagon said Friday it has opened a formal command investigation into the Feb. 28 strike in Minab, Iran, where Iranian regime officials claim dozens of children were killed in a strike at a school beside a military compound. 

Advertisement

Questions continue to mount about possible U.S. involvement in the strike, the intelligence used before it and whether Iran placed military assets near civilians to shield them or weaponize potential casualties.

War Secretary Pete Hegseth said at a Pentagon briefing that U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) has appointed a senior officer from outside the command to lead the review. 

«CENTCOM has designated an investigating officer to complete a command investigation,» Hegseth said, noting that the investigator is a general officer from outside the command. «The command investigation will take as long as necessary to address all the matters surrounding this incident.» 

Advertisement

CENTCOM ISSUES SAFETY WARNING TO IRANIAN CIVILIANS AS REGIME USES ‘HEAVILY POPULATED’ AREAS FOR LAUNCHES

«There’s only one entity in this conflict, between us and Iran, that never targets civilians, literally never target civilians,» he said, defending U.S. targeting procedures while the investigation unfolds. «We will investigate. We’ll get to the truth and we’ll share it when we have it.»

The strike has drawn scrutiny as the investigation continues without answers. 

Advertisement

If U.S. forces carried out the attack, it would raise questions about how American military planners assess civilian risk in densely populated areas and whether safeguards designed to prevent unintended casualties functioned as intended in the opening phase of a high-intensity conflict.

A view of debris at a school in Hormozgan province, Iran, on March 5, 2026. Local authorities reported casualties after strikes in the area from a girls primary school in the city of Minab. The building sustained significant structural damage following two reported air strikes approximately 40 minutes apart. The Pentagon is investigating the strike. (Stringer/Anadolu via Getty Image)

CENTCOM, the military department tasked with overseeing the U.S. operation in Iran and all Middle East operations, has declined to confirm whether American forces launched the missile, saying only that «it would be inappropriate to comment given the incident is under investigation.»

Advertisement

Iranian-American journalist Banafsheh Zand, who has been following the reporting in Iran, pointed to the school that has been there for more than a decade, reported affiliation with Iran’s military. 

«The school itself was for the children of the (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) Navy, and it speaks volumes to where the place was and how they use civilian shields,» she said. 

The use of human shields is against international humanitarian law.  

Advertisement

While the regime claims between 168 fatalities and 180 fatalities, mostly girls between the ages of 7 and 12, along with teachers and parents from the school, Zand told Fox News Digital that there has been no independent confirmation of the reported casualty figures. 

«There is no confirmation on the number of people, from anyone other than regime sources,» she said. «Some people in the area said it was 65 boys. Sixty-five boys? What are 65 boys doing in a girls’ school at 10:30 on a Saturday morning?»

War Secretary Pete Hegseth

US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a joint press conference with Admiral Charles Bradford «Brad» Cooper II, Commander of US Central Command, at US Central Command (CENTCOM) headquarters at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Florida, on March 5, 2026.  (Octavio JONES / AFP via Getty Images)

Addressing satellite images that appear to show newly dug graves, Zand added: «The number of graves are not in keeping with the number of people that they claim is dead. It doesn’t match up.» 

Advertisement

The U.S. government has not confirmed the death toll. 

Preliminary findings from U.S. officials suggest the strike was likely carried out by American forces, The New York Times reported Wednesday, though the investigation remains ongoing.

In response to the Times’ reporting, Central Command reiterated to Fox News Digital that the investigation is ongoing. 

Advertisement

IRAN UNREST ESCALATES AS GUNFIRE, TEAR GAS HIT UNIVERSITIES AMID LOOMING US STRIKE

Retired Vice Adm. Kevin Donegan, who previously commanded U.S. Naval Forces Central Command and the U.S. 5th Fleet, cautioned against getting ahead of the full review and said U.S. targeting doctrine is designed to prevent civilian tragedies, including legal review and collateral damage assessments before a strike is approved.

A demonstrator holding a picture of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during a rally in Tehran

A demonstrator holds a picture of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during a rally in Tehran in solidarity with the government against Israel’s attacks and to mark Eid al-Ghadir. (Atta Kenare/Getty Images) (Atta Kenare/Getty Images)

«We actually have judge advocates that sit there and help us through the process of targeting,» Donegan told Fox News Digital. 

Advertisement

But even precision-guided weapons do not eliminate uncertainty.

«War isn’t precise,» Donegan said. «Mistakes can be made, and they can happen anywhere in the chain of events.»

Raytheon, the manufacturer of the Tomahawk missile, could not be reached for comment.

Advertisement

Wes Bryant, the Pentagon’s former chief of civilian harm assessments, said his office, the Civilian Protection Center of Excellence, was tasked with advising commanders on targeting and ways to mitigate civilian harm but had been severely curtailed over the past year. 

HORMOZGAN, IRAN - MARCH 05: A view of the debris of a school, where many students and teachers lost their lives on the first day of the wave of attacks launched by the United States and Israel against Iran, in Hormozgan, Iran on March 05, 2026. As a result of the attack, which was carried out twice, 40 minutes apart, on a girls primary school in the city of Minab, the school building suffered severe damage.

Image shows a girls’ school struck in Minab, Iran. (Stringer/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Bryant said that taken together, the available evidence strongly suggests U.S. involvement.

«All evidence, at this point, points to a U.S. strike,» Bryant told Fox News Digital. 

Advertisement

If U.S. forces conducted the strike, Bryant said the more plausible explanation would involve a failure in target identification or civilian risk assessment.

«These munitions have a very small circular probable,» Bryant said. «If it missed, it would have been within a few meters.» 

Minab school strike

This picture obtained from Iran’s ISNA news agency shows the site of a strike on a girls’ school in Minab, in Iran’s southern Hormozgan province, on Feb. 28, 2026. (Ali Najafi/ISNA/AFP via Getty Images)

Satellite imagery and reporting from Iranian officials indicate the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school sat roughly 600 meters from the adjacent Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps naval facility in Minab, Iran, underscoring how closely civilian and military infrastructure were positioned.

Advertisement

«I’m leaning more toward that this is complete misidentification,» from the U.S., he said, arguing that the likely issue would be a failure to properly vet or update targeting information rather than a random malfunction.

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told Fox News Digital, «This investigation is ongoing. As we have said, unlike the terrorist Iranian regime, the United States does not target civilians.»  

IRAN LOCKS NATION INTO ‘DARKER’ DIGITAL BLACKOUT, VIEWING INTERNET AS AN ‘EXISTENTIAL THREAT’

Advertisement

Possible Tomahawk missile and strike location

Open-source video analysis and reported missile remnants have fueled speculation that the munition resembled a U.S. Tomahawk cruise missile — a weapon Iran does not operate. 

The Tomahawk is fielded by the U.S. and a limited number of close allies, including the United Kingdom and Australia, neither of which have been firing missiles in the conflict.

The Tomahawk is a long-range, precision-guided cruise missile capable of striking targets hundreds of miles away and typically carrying a high-explosive warhead.

Advertisement

Independent open-source investigators, including Bellingcat, a Netherlands-based investigative journalism group specializing in open-source analysis, have examined video and satellite imagery from the area and reported that multiple strikes hit the compound within a short time window. 

However, commentators on social media have their own theories. 

«The wing-to-body ratio of the munition in question matches an Iranian Kh-55–derived Land Attack Cruise Missile,» said podcast host and veteran Matt Tardio on X. «So what could have caused this? Simply put, GPS jamming of an Iranian KH-55. The USA and Israel were, and continue to actively jam the Iranian airspace.»

Advertisement

IRAN WAR, 11 DAYS IN: US CONTROLS SKIES, OIL SURGES AND THE REGION BRACES FOR WHAT’S NEXT

Aerial view of a cemetery in Minab, Iran, where funerals are being held for students and staff killed in a Feb. 28 strike near an IRGC base.

An aerial view shows funerals underway at a graveyard in Minab, Iran, March 3, 2026, for students and staff from a girls school who authorities said were killed in a Feb. 28 strike. (Handout/Getty Images)

Former National Security Council official Javed Ali, now a professor at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, told Fox News Digital the central question is the quality of intelligence that informed the strike decision.

«How solid was the intelligence picture on that facility?» Ali said. «How good was the intelligence that went into what’s called a target package?»

Advertisement

OPERATION EPIC FURY DESTROYS IRAN’S NAVY AND CUTS MISSILE ATTACKS BY 90% IN ONGOING CAMPAIGN

Ali, who previously worked on targeting analysis at the Defense Intelligence Agency, said military strikes are typically built from multiple streams of intelligence — human, technical, geospatial and open source — designed to provide high confidence that a structure is a legitimate military objective.

«Clearly something went wrong,» Ali said.

Advertisement

Civilian proximity raises targeting questions

Bryant said the Pentagon’s Civilian Protection Center of Excellence and broader civilian harm mitigation enterprise were scaled back in 2025, reducing the number of personnel available to conduct investigations into civilian harm.

The center was established by Congress to help the military minimize harm to civilians in conflict, but reporting shows its dedicated staff were folded into broader bureaucratic units or removed as part of a departmental reorganization. 

Its teams were designed to work with commanders on target planning to make sure targets were active military sites and advise on the potential for civilian harm, according to Bryant. 

Advertisement
A person watches a smoke plume rise in the distant in Tehran, Iran on March 2, 2026.

A general view of Tehran with smoke visible in the distance after explosions were reported in the city, on March 02, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. (Contributor/Getty Images)

The Pentagon has not publicly detailed the current status or staffing of the office, nor confirmed whether the office is involved in the ongoing Minab, Iran, school investigation.

IRAN OPERATING SECRET ‘BLACK BOX’ SITES HOLDING THOUSANDS IN DETENTION: REPORTS

An open source intelligence expert and former intel official, who requested anonymity, told Fox News Digital the structure resembles the other military buildings that were targeted in the strike, which could help explain how an intelligence misreading might occur and lead analysts to believe the site was another military facility within the compound.

Advertisement

Analysts say when civilian casualties occur during precision strikes, the explanations generally fall into three categories: intelligence failure, technical malfunction or human error.

Mourners gather at a funeral in Minab, Iran, for children killed in a reported strike on a primary school.

Mourners attend the funeral of children killed in a reported strike on a primary school in Minab, Hormozgan province, Iran, on March 3, 2026.  (Amirhossein Khorgooei/ISNA/AFP via Getty Images)

Amos Yadlin, a former head of Israeli military intelligence, told Fox News Digital incorrect or outdated intelligence could lead to misidentification, while a GPS-guided munition could malfunction or be disrupted. Human error — such as incorrect coordinate entry — is another possibility. 

If an investigation ultimately finds negligence or a breakdown in targeting procedures, the U.S. military has a precedent for imposing consequences.

Advertisement

Bryant pointed to the 2015 U.S. strike on a hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, that killed dozens of patients and medical staff at a facility operated by Doctors Without Borders, the international humanitarian medical charity which a U.S. army investigation later concluded was «a tragic and avoidable accident.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

A U.S. military investigation later concluded that airstrike was «a tragic and avoidable accident» caused primarily by human error and procedural failures, with the medical facility mistakenly identified as a combat target.

Advertisement

«In that case, a couple of different commanders were removed,» Bryant said, noting that accountability can range from administrative measures to the revocation of certifications, depending on findings.

war with iran,iran,conflicts defense,pentagon,pete hegseth

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

El frenético intento de Irán por salvar sus barcos antes del ataque con torpedos

Published

on


Horas después de que un torpedo estadounidense hundiera un buque de guerra iraní frente a las costas de Sri Lanka, el hospital más grande de Galle, la ciudad portuaria más cercana al lugar del desastre, comenzó a llenarse.

Ambulancias blancas con cruces rojas iban y venían a toda velocidad entre el puerto y el hospital transportando a los heridos, mientras que los fallecidos llegaban más tarde en camiones.

Advertisement

Al final del día, la morgue se había quedado sin espacio.

El personal del hospital tuvo que colocar bolsas para cadáveres en una mezcla de aserrín y hielo seco —una técnica que usan los pescadores para evitar que sus capturas se echen a perder— mientras esperaban la llegada de dos vehículos refrigerados.

Sri Lanka, una nación insular en el Océano Índico a más de 3.200 kilómetros del Golfo Pérsico, se vio envuelta en una guerra lejana y en una inesperada disputa diplomática con Irán.

Advertisement

Los diplomáticos iraníes estaban molestos porque Sri Lanka no había permitido la entrada del Dena, uno de los buques de guerra más preciados de Irán, en sus aguas territoriales, a pesar de que el país había invitado previamente a la armada iraní a visitarlas.

Las autoridades de Sri Lanka se mostraron sorprendidas cuando el Dena y otros dos buques iraníes solicitaron a finales de febrero su llegada con poca antelación.

Tras el ataque de Estados Unidos e Israel a Irán el 28 de febrero, Sri Lanka se mostró reticente, temiendo que admitirlos afectara su neutralidad en la guerra entre Estados Unidos e Israel contra Irán y amenazara su seguridad.

Advertisement

Mientras sus barcos y helicópteros rescataban a los marineros del Dena, el gobierno tardó un día más en decidir proteger al Bushehr, un viejo buque de abastecimiento de la flota que solicitaba refugio.

Para entonces, el tercero, un buque de desembarco iraní llamado Lavan, ya estaba atracado en un puerto de la vecina India.

Sri Lanka e Irán mantienen relaciones amistosas, pero la cautela de Sri Lanka inquietó a los funcionarios iraníes, quienes consideraron que dejaba al Bushehr expuesto a un ataque posterior, según dos personas con conocimiento directo de las conversaciones diplomáticas.

Advertisement

Estas personas pidieron permanecer en el anonimato por no estar autorizadas a hablar públicamente.

Dilema

El gobierno de Sri Lanka no pudo llegar a una decisión rápida, sopesando sus intereses nacionales frente a sus obligaciones bajo el derecho internacional de ayudar a un buque en peligro.

Advertisement

La inquietud del gobierno ilustra el desafío que enfrentan muchos países mientras intentan evitar la ira de la administración Trump.

Irán calificó el ataque contra el Dena de «atrocidad».

Pete Hegseth, secretario de Defensa de Estados Unidos, celebró el torpedeo de un buque de guerra iraní que «se creía seguro en aguas internacionales», uno de los más de 50 buques de guerra iraníes que Estados Unidos afirma haber destruido.

Advertisement

Para Sri Lanka —un pequeño país de 22 millones de habitantes que ha sufrido corrupción y conflictos políticos, una deuda nacional aplastante y un ciclón devastador el año pasado— un paso en falso geopolítico podría causar más daños económicos.

Ahora debe decidir qué hacer con los 32 marineros rescatados del Dena y los más de 200 desembarcados del Bushehr.

El Ministerio de Defensa de Sri Lanka informó que había enviado un comunicado a Irán y que estaba a la espera de respuesta.

Advertisement

Mientras tanto, a los marineros se les han otorgado visas de 30 días.

El juez principal de Galle ha ordenado al hospital que traslade los 84 cadáveres recuperados a la embajada iraní.

India también se encuentra encajada entre Irán y Estados Unidos, ya que alberga al Lavan, atracado en un activo centro comercial en Kochi, y aloja a su tripulación de 183 personas —en su mayoría cadetes jóvenes— en instalaciones navales cercanas.

Advertisement

Una visita sorpresa

Aproximadamente dos semanas antes de que el Dena fuera torpedeado, los tres barcos iraníes estaban entre las docenas de buques y personal naval de más de 70 países que participaron en ejercicios navales en tiempos de paz frente a la ciudad de Visakhapatnam, en el sureste de la India.

En los ejercicios, realizados bajo el lema “Camarada, Cooperación, Colaboración”, participaron buques de varios países europeos, incluida Rusia, e incluso un avión de reconocimiento de Estados Unidos.

Advertisement

Marineros iraníes permanecieron firmes a bordo del Dena mientras la presidenta de la India, Droupadi Murmu, presidía una revista naval durante el evento de 10 días organizado por la armada india.

El comandante del contingente de Sri Lanka se reunió con un alto oficial de la marina iraní en la India y lo invitó a visitar Sri Lanka, un gesto de cortesía rutinario que, según funcionarios de Sri Lanka, se suele extender a otros países.

Al día siguiente de la finalización de los ejercicios, el 25 de febrero, y de que los barcos comenzaran su regreso a casa, las fuerzas estadounidenses se concentraban en el Golfo.

Advertisement

Funcionarios iraníes solicitaron al gobierno de Sri Lanka la visita de sus tres barcos durante cuatro días para «fortalecer la cooperación» a partir del 9 de marzo, según funcionarios esrilanqueses.

La solicitud tomó a Sri Lanka por sorpresa, sobre todo cuando descubrieron que la flotilla ya estaba cerca de Galle, una antigua ciudad portuaria hacia el sur de la isla, a unas 800 millas náuticas de Visakhapatnam.

Mientras Sri Lanka preparaba los trámites, Estados Unidos e Israel iniciaron ataques aéreos contra Irán el 28 de febrero.

Advertisement

Esto hizo reflexionar a Sri Lanka.

Funcionarios gubernamentales expresaron su preocupación de que la entrada de los buques pudiera llevar el conflicto a sus costas, aun reconociendo que los barcos iraníes eran blancos más fáciles si permanecían en aguas internacionales.

Funcionarios iraníes también se comunicaron con la India el 28 de febrero solicitando refugio.

Advertisement

La India dio permiso al día siguiente, según informaron funcionarios del gobierno en Nueva Delhi.

Sin embargo, solo el Lavan llegó a la India, «presumiblemente» por ser el más cercano, declaró el sábado S. Jaishankar, ministro de Asuntos Exteriores de la India.

Furia, confusión y consternación

Advertisement

Las señales de socorro comenzaron a llegar a las 5:08 a. m. del 4 de marzo, a unas 19 millas náuticas de Galle.

El Dena había sido impactado por un torpedo pesado Mark-48, diseñado para destrozar un barco desde abajo.

La Armada y la Fuerza Aérea de Sri Lanka se apresuraron a organizar el rescate, y la India envió ayuda posteriormente.

Advertisement

Encontraron cadáveres y balsas salvavidas entre las manchas de petróleo en el mar, pero ninguna señal del buque de guerra.

Las primeras víctimas llegaron a Galle esa misma mañana.

Los equipos de rescate, algunos de ellos con trajes de protección, subieron los cadáveres de los buques de la Armada y los botes salvavidas a camillas y los llevaron rápidamente al hospital.

Advertisement

Los tripulantes iraníes supervivientes, muchos de ellos jóvenes cadetes, llegaron con fracturas y lesiones en la cabeza y el pecho.

Algunos presentaban fracturas de columna; un médico que los examinó dijo que probablemente se debieron a que la explosión los impulsó hacia arriba antes de caer con fuerza.

El martes, Sri Lanka canceló su búsqueda debido a que alrededor de 20 personas aún estaban desaparecidas.

Advertisement

Estados Unidos no ha aclarado si advirtió a los marineros iraníes antes del ataque, pero funcionarios iraníes y ceilandeses afirmaron que no recibieron ninguna advertencia.

El gobierno iraní declaró que el Dena estaba desarmado e indefenso.

El Comando Indo-Pacífico de Estados Unidos refutó esta afirmación en una publicación en redes sociales.

Advertisement

Pero el Dena no era el único barco allí.

El Bushehr, un buque de guerra más pequeño que a veces se utiliza como buque de entrenamiento, también estaba esperando que Sri Lanka lo dejara entrar.

Menos de una semana antes, el 27 de febrero, Sri Lanka había sacado a tierra a un marinero iraní herido del barco para que recibiera tratamiento, determinando que tenía la obligación de proporcionar asistencia humanitaria según las leyes marítimas internacionales.

Advertisement

Pero el Bushehr, con más de 200 tripulantes a bordo, permaneció en aguas internacionales al oeste de Sri Lanka, cerca de Colombo, la capital y un importante puerto comercial. Funcionarios del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de Sri Lanka mantuvieron extensas conversaciones con sus homólogos iraníes cuando el Bushehr informó de que uno de sus motores había sufrido daños, lo que reforzó su solicitud de refugio seguro por razones humanitarias.

El 5 de marzo, Sri Lanka tomó bajo custodia al Bushehr. Ambas partes acordaron que la tripulación desembarcaría en Colombo ese mismo día y que el barco navegaría hacia un puerto más pequeño en Trincomalee, al noreste del país.

Esa noche, el presidente de Sri Lanka, Anura Kumara Dissanayake, declaró que su gobierno se encontraba en un dilema.

Advertisement

En un discurso televisado, afirmó que la neutralidad del país, en particular en el contexto del conflicto de Oriente Medio, dictaba que no podía permitir que su territorio, zonas marítimas o espacio aéreo fueran utilizados de forma sesgada por ninguna nación involucrada en un conflicto.

Pero dijo que también tenían que respetar las leyes internacionales, incluida la Convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Derecho del Mar de 1982, que tiene directrices sobre cómo ayudar a los barcos en peligro.

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias