INTERNACIONAL
Trump appointee Barrett challenges administration on nationwide injunctions, surprises and delights liberals
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett sparred with U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer Thursday, pressing him on whether the Trump administration would follow federal court precedent. The exchange quickly became one of the day’s most talked-about moments and could reignite criticism of Barrett from Trump allies.
The back-and-forth took place Thursday during oral arguments in a case related to President Donald Trump’s effort to end birthright citizenship with a specific focus on whether lower courts should be able to block executive actions from taking effect nationwide.
Justice Barrett, a Trump appointee, grilled Sauer about the administration’s stance toward lower court rulings, which followed similar lines of inquiry from her colleagues on the bench.
«I want to ask you about a potential tension,» she began, before stopping to correct herself. «Well, no, not a potential tension, an actual tension that I see in answers that you gave to Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Kagan.»
JUSTICE KAGAN SNAPS AT TRUMP LAWYER IN MAJOR CASE: ‘EVERY COURT HAS RULED AGAINST YOU’
President Donald Trump, alongside Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, left, and Secretary of Commerce nominee Howard Lutnick, right, speaks to reporters as he signs an executive order to create a U.S. sovereign wealth fund in the Oval Office of the White House Feb. 3, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)
Barrett then asked Sauer if the Trump administration «wanted to reserve its right to maybe not follow a Second Circuit precedent, say, in New York, because you might disagree with its opinion?»
«You resisted Justice Kagan when she asked you whether the government would obey» such a precedent, she said.
Sauer responded, «Our general practice is to respect those precedents. But there are circumstances when it is not a categorical practice, and that is not …»
Barrett interrupted, asking if that is the Trump administration’s practice or «the long-standing practice of the federal government?»
Sauer replied that it is «the long-standing policy of the Department of Justice.»
«Really?» she asked.
SUPREME COURT TAKES ON BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP: JUSTICES SEEMINGLY SPLIT ON LOWER COURT POWERS
«Yes, as it was phrased to me, we generally respect circuit precedent, but not necessarily in every case,» Sauer said. «Some examples might be a situation where we are litigating to get that circuit precedent overruled and so on,» he added later.
«That’s not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about this week,» Barrett stressed, pointing to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling that Trump’s birthright citizenship order is unconstitutional.
«And what do you do the next day, or the next week?» she asked.
«Generally, we follow this,» Sauer said, which provoked a somewhat incredulous response from the justice.
«So, you’re still saying generally?» she asked him. «And you still think that it’s generally the long-standing policy of the federal government to take that approach?»
Protesters demonstrating against President Donald Trump’s during the early months of his second presidential term, and President Donald Trump signing an executive order at the White House. The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Thursday, May 15, on a case involving Trump’s birthright citizenship executive orders. (Getty Images)
The remarks sparked divided political reactions on social media, with Democratic strategist Max Burns noting, «Trump Solicitor General D. John Sauer tells Justice Amy Coney Barrett that Trump ‘generally’ tries to respect federal court decisions but he has the ‘right’ to disregard legal opinions he personally disagrees with. Coney Barrett seems to be in disbelief.»
«John Sauer just said the quiet part out loud: unless the Supreme Court tells them directly, Trump’s team might ignore lower court rulings,» said Seth Taylor, a 2024 DNC delegate. «That’s not governance – that’s constitutional brinksmanship.»
«Amy Coney Barrett (ACB) is proving once again she may the the worst SCOTUS pick ever by a Republican,» conservative commentator and podcast host Cash Loren said on social media.
«She has a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court. … Yet you can hear her disdain for the Trump administration.»
100 DAYS OF INJUNCTIONS, TRIALS AND ‘TEFLON DON’: TRUMP SECOND TERM MEETS ITS BIGGEST TESTS IN COURT
Demonstrators hold up signs during a protest against President Donald Trump at the Washington Monument in Washington April 5, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
Earlier this year, Barrett sided with three of the Supreme Court’s liberal justices and Chief Justice John Roberts in rejecting, 5-4, the Trump administration’s request to block billions in USAID money for previously completed projects.
The decision sparked fierce criticism from Trump supporters, who have attempted to label Justice Barrett an «activist» justice and someone who has been insufficiently loyal to the president who tapped her for the high court.
Others have pointed out her track record as a reliably conservative voter and the fact the court has lifetime appointments to allow justices to ostensibly act without undue political interference.
Trump later said he had no knowledge of the attacks against her, telling reporters, «She’s a very good woman.»
«She’s very smart, and I don’t know about people attacking her. I really don’t know.» Trump added.
The court ruling could come in a matter of days or weeks. But it will likely hinge closely on the votes of two Trump appointees, Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Barrett, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley told Fox News Friday.
Overall, he said of the hearing, «it got pretty sporty in there.»
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
«There were some lively moments, at least lively for the Supreme Court,» he said, before noting the justices to watch are Gorsuch and Barrett.
«Justice Barrett is probably the greatest concern right now for the Trump administration,» Turley said.
Donald Trump,Supreme Court,Federal Courts,Politics,Judiciary
El régimen de Irán lanzó una amenaza directa a los países europeos y a Estados Unidos en vísperas de una nueva reunión del Organismo Internacional de Energía Atómica (OIEA), prevista para este lunes en Viena. El portavoz de la Organización de Energía Atómica iraní, Behrouz Kamalvandi, advirtió el domingo que Teherán reducirá su cooperación con el organismo de control nuclear de la ONU si se aprueba una resolución que lo acuse de incumplimientos en su programa nuclear.
“Ciertamente, el OIEA no debe esperar que la República Islámica de Irán continúe su amplia y amistosa cooperación”, declaró Kamalvandi en la televisión estatal.
La amenaza iraní se produce tras la publicación, el 31 de mayo, de un informe del OIEA que reaviva las sospechas sobre la dimensión militar del programa nuclear iraní. Un análisis del think tank estadounidense Institute for Science and International Security sostiene que Irán realizó y ocultó varias pruebas de implosión en 2003, paso clave en el desarrollo de un arma nuclear.
Según el instituto, estas pruebas en Marivan utilizaron sistemas hemisféricos de implosión a escala real, con explosivos capaces de generar una onda de choque esférica hacia el interior, que comprime un núcleo explosivo simulado de uranio natural o empobrecido, en lugar del altamente enriquecido. Estas “pruebas frías” serían indicativas de un plan avanzado para construir una bomba.
Además, el informe relaciona actividades en cuatro instalaciones clave —Marivan, Lavisan-Shian, Varamin y Turquz-Abad— con la desaparición de material nuclear cuya localización sigue sin esclarecerse. Pese a estas revelaciones, Teherán insiste en que su programa tiene fines exclusivamente pacíficos, aunque ya ha logrado enriquecer uranio hasta el 60%, un nivel sin justificación civil y cerca del 90% requerido para armamento nuclear.
Estados Unidos, junto con el grupo E3 (Francia, Alemania y Reino Unido), ha anunciado la presentación de un borrador de resolución que acusa formalmente a Irán de violar sus obligaciones legales como Estado miembro del OIEA. Aunque la resolución no remitirá de inmediato el caso al Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU, como ocurrió en 2006, representa un cambio significativo en el tono y contenido de las acciones diplomáticas.
Una fuente diplomática citada por la agencia EFE calificó el documento como un “paso grave”, pero aseguró que “no se está cerrando la puerta a la diplomacia”. El proyecto otorga a Irán un margen para responder a las demandas pendientes del organismo, bajo la advertencia de una posible sesión extraordinaria del OIEA durante el verano si no hay avances.
Desde Irán, la respuesta no se hizo esperar. El ministro de Exteriores, Abbas Araqchi, emitió un mensaje en la red social X calificando la maniobra occidental como “otro grave error estratégico”. Comparó la actual ofensiva diplomática con la situación de 2005, cuando un movimiento similar del E3, según él, precipitó el inicio del enriquecimiento de uranio en Irán.
“La culpa recae exclusivamente en actores irresponsables que no se detienen ante nada para ganar relevancia”, escribió Araqchi. “¿De verdad no ha aprendido nada el E3 en las últimas dos décadas?”
El canciller también señaló que las acusaciones actuales se basan en un informe “débil y politizado”, y denunció que Europa está optando por “acciones malignas” en lugar de continuar con la cooperación.
Estas declaraciones se producen en medio de contactos diplomáticos renovados entre Irán y Estados Unidos, los primeros desde que Donald Trump se retirara del acuerdo nuclear en 2018. Aquel pacto, firmado en 2015 con las principales potencias mundiales, impuso límites estrictos al programa nuclear iraní a cambio del levantamiento de sanciones económicas. Tras su colapso, Irán comenzó a superar sistemáticamente las restricciones impuestas por el acuerdo.
Ahora, en pleno intento de negociación de un nuevo entendimiento, la aprobación de esta resolución podría entorpecer los esfuerzos diplomáticos y escalar la confrontación entre Teherán y Occidente.
(Con información de EFE y AFP)
INTERNACIONAL
Flashback: Biden repeatedly equated Islamophobia and antisemitism amid surge in attacks on Jews
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
As violent instances of antisemitism break out around the country this year, Fox News Digital took a look back at former President Joe Biden’s penchant for equating antisemitism and Islamophobia.
While the former president rightly condemned hate directed at Jews in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre of Israelis and the subsequent war in Gaza, Biden was almost always sure to draw an equivalency with anti-Muslim sentiment.
«In recent years, too much hate has given too much oxygen, fueling racism, the rise of antisemitism, Islamophobia right here in America,» Biden said, days after the war broke out, in a prime-time address from the White House. He added: «We can’t stand by and stand silent when this happens. We must, without equivocation, denounce antisemitism. We must also, without equivocation, denounce Islamophobia.»
Biden added during a Human Rights Campaign event in October 2023: «We have to reject hate in everything, because history has taught us again and again, antisemitism, Islamophobia, homophobia, transphobia, they’re all connected. Hate toward one group left unanswered opens the door for more hate toward more groups, more often, regularly.»
Instances of antisemitism spiked to new highs last year, with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) finding in a new report that there were 9,354 antisemitic incidents in 2024, a 5% increase from 2023 and a staggering 926% increase since it began tracking such data in 1979.
TRUMP ADMIN CRACKS DOWN ANTISEMITISM AS DOJ OFFICIAL EXPOSES ‘VIOLENT RHETORIC’ OF RADICAL PROTESTERS
Former President Joe Biden speaks at a news conference on the final days of office. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)
The war in Israel initially fanned the flames of antisemitism on campuses in the form of protests, menacing graffiti and students reporting that they felt as if it was «open season for Jews on our campuses.» The protests heightened to the point that Jewish students at some schools, including Columbia University, were warned to leave campus for their own safety.
Agitators and student protesters flooded college campuses nationwide last school year to protest the war, which also included spiking instances of antisemitism and Jewish students publicly speaking out that they did not feel safe on some campuses.
Protesters on Columbia University’s campus in New York City, for example, took over the school’s Hamilton Hall building, while schools such as UCLA, Harvard and Yale worked to clear spiraling student encampments where protesters demanded their elite schools completely divest from Israel.
ANTISEMITIC VIOLENCE ERUPTS IN AMERICA AS SOME INVOKE INTIFADA AND TARGET JEWS
Anti-Israel protesters link arms on the campus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 6, 2024, in Cambridge, Massachusetts. (AP Photo/Steve LeBlanc)
As the protests hit a fever pitch last year, Biden again equated antisemitism with Islamophobia, even though it was clear that Jews were the group being targeted with harassment and violence.
«There should be no place on any campus, no place in America for antisemitism or threats of violence against Jewish students. There is no place for hate speech or violence of any kind, whether it’s antisemitism, Islamophobia, or discrimination against Arab Americans or Palestinian Americans,» Biden said from the White House in May 2024 as the protests on college campuses continued.
«It’s simply wrong. There is no place for racism in America.»
Biden faced condemnation from conservatives and other critics for not simply denouncing antisemitism as Jews in the U.S. faced protests and instances of antisemitism.
JEWISH STUDENTS WELCOME TRUMP ADMIN’S CRACKDOWN ON ANTISEMITISM, HAMAS SYMPATHIZERS ON CAMPUSES
«At a time when no college campus is on lockdown over Islamophobia, Joe Biden felt the need to spend as much time in his speech denouncing Islamophobia and ‘discrimination against Arab Americans’ as he did antisemitism. He is never able to just call out antisemitism,» radio host Erick Erickson commented on X in May 2024 as campus protests against Israel raged.
Anti-Israel protesters rally outside of New York University’s campus in New York City on May 3, 2024. (Rashid Umar Abbasi for Fox News Digital)
«Biden repeats his both-sideisms,» veteran James Hutton wrote last year of Biden’s previous comments. «Only the Jewish students are being violated. Biden knows that, but he really wants those votes in Michigan.»
«Biden is incapable of simply condemning antisemitism. Yet another equivocation. This administration is an embarrassment,» Kerry Rom, deputy communications director for Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., wrote on X last year.
ISRAELI COLUMBIA PROFESSOR WANTS TRUMP TO BLOCK CERTAIN INSTITUTIONS FROM RECEIVING FEDERAL FUNDING
Family and friends gather outside Congregation Beth Torah after a funeral for Sarah Milgrim, a staffer at the Israeli Embassy who was killed outside a Washington Jewish museum, May 27, 2025, in Overland Park, Kansas. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)
This year, the Trump administration is cracking down on antisemitism and attacks on American Jews, which were underscored by a shooting that left a Jewish couple dead on the streets of Washington, D.C., last month outside of a Jewish museum, as well as a terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, last Sunday when an Egyptian national identified as Mohamed Sabry Soliman allegedly hurled Molotov cocktails at people participating in a solidarity event for Israeli hostages still in Hamas captivity.
Boulder firebomb attack and suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman (Storyful/KDVR)
Soliman’s charging documents stated that he «traveled to Boulder, Colorado, in his vehicle with the Molotov cocktails and threw two of the cocktails at individuals participating in a pro-Israel gathering. He also stated that he picked up gas at a gas station on the way to Boulder. He stated that he wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead.»
BIDEN ADMINISTRATION LAUNCHES NATIONAL STRATEGY TO COMBAT ISLAMOPHOBIA, ANTI-ARAB HATE
Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro – the Keystone State’s third Jewish governor – faced his own instance of antisemitism when a suspect set fire to the governor’s residence while he and his family were asleep on the first night of Passover.
President Donald Trump’s administration has taken steps to crack down on antisemitism in the U.S. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
President Donald Trump meanwhile, signed an executive order on «Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism» in January as his administration launched its crackdown on antisemitism. While federal law enforcement officials have arrested individuals allegedly tied to the widespread anti-Israel protests last year, the White House has threatened to end federal funding to universities that allow violent anti-Israel protests and is investigating immigration status of those accused of leading campus protests or carrying out antisemitic attacks.
INTERNACIONAL
Francia: comienza en Niza la conferencia de Naciones Unidas para proteger los océanos del mundo
Ciudad blindada y ciudadanos enojados
Un centro construido en tiempo récord
El presidente francés, Emmanuel Macron y el príncipe Alberto II de Mónaco (centro-der.), posan en el escenario al final del Foro de Economía y Finanzas Azules, antes de la Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre los Océanos de 2025 en Niza. Foto EFEObjetivos y acciones
El PJ levanta la guardia y activa reuniones por el posible fallo de la Corte Suprema contra Cristina Kirchner
Valentina Cervantes rompió el silencio sobre Pampita y los rumores de infidelidad
El Gobierno modificará por decreto la Ley de Glaciares para ampliar las áreas de explotación
las perlitas de los comicios en Misiones
El contundente anticipo de Javier Milei sobre la inflación del 2026
El régimen de Irán amenazó con reducir su cooperación nuclear con el OIEA
Josefina Pouso contó toda la verdad de su romance con el Chato Prada: “Una barrabasada”
La imperdonable actitud que Marcelo Tinelli tuvo con Coki Ramírez y que lo obligó a pedir perdón: «Fue horrible, me pidió disculpas»
Qué es la tercera sección electoral, el bastión del peronismo donde Cristina Kirchner será candidata
“Podés renunciar y trabajar de otra cosa”: la frase de Lilia Lemoine que indignó a los médicos del Garrahan
Cerró la paritaria del Congreso y se viene un nuevo aumento para los senadores: el sueldo será de $9,5 millones
Cristina Kirchner advirtió que la pueden “meter presa” y lo relacionó con su candidatura a diputada provincial
El ICP platense lanza su Curso 2025: formación política crítica y federal para jóvenes de todo el país
El ICP lanza su Curso 2025: formación política crítica y federal para jóvenes de todo el país Con una propuesta...
Santiago Cúneo: “Cristina Kirchner necesita un grupo de psicólogos y retirarse de la política”
Sobre la expresidenta, Santiago Cúneo fue lapidario: “Lo de Cristina Fernández de Kirchner es un papelón. Debería darse cuenta de que...
Siguen las denuncias contra el IOMA: Persecución política, acoso laboral y violencia de género
Trabajadoras del IOMA denuncian persecución política, acoso laboral y violencia de género por parte de las autoridades del organismo, en...
-
CHIMENTOS3 días agoLa imperdonable actitud que Marcelo Tinelli tuvo con Coki Ramírez y que lo obligó a pedir perdón: «Fue horrible, me pidió disculpas»
-
POLITICA23 horas agoCristina Kirchner advirtió que la pueden “meter presa” y lo relacionó con su candidatura a diputada provincial
-
ECONOMIA2 días agoUn proyecto de u$s100.000 millones: claves del acuerdo entre Milei y Meloni para exportar gas de Vaca Muerta