Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Remembering Rep. Charlie Rangel — and a voicemail I’ll never forget

Published

on


I didn’t recognize the «917» New York number that called me.

But there was no question about who phoned after they left a message.

Advertisement

The caller on the voicemail was utterly unmistakable.

They didn’t say their name.

They didn’t have to.

Advertisement

«Chad, you’re the only one who missed me,» croaked the voice.

FORMER NY DEMOCRATIC REP CHARLIE RANGEL DEAD AT 94

It carried the sleekness of a stone crusher working over basalt in a West Virginia quarry.

Advertisement

The voicemail was from the late Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y. And he was essentially calling to assure me that he wasn’t dead.

After all, I was apparently the only member of the congressional press corps who noticed that the New York Democrat hadn’t voted nor been anywhere near the U.S. Capitol in several weeks.

There was no article in Roll Call. Nothing in Politico. No statement from his office.

Advertisement

Rangel just wasn’t around.

Former Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y. — a man whose tenure on Capitol Hill I have many fond memories of — died Monday. He was 94. (Andrew Burton/Getty Images)

So I called and wound up speaking to his communications director Hannah Kim and chief of staff George Henry.

Advertisement

I inquired if Rangel was all right. They assured me he was. But they didn’t quite give me the full story. That was for Rangel to do.

And then Rangel himself called — from his sickbed — so I could hear his signature jackhammer-chopping-through-the-asphalt-of-Manhattan voice to prove to this reporter he was still among the living.

«I wanted you to hear it from me,» said Rangel.

Advertisement

EX-REP. CHARLIE RANGEL, 94, QUESTIONS WHETHER BIDEN BELONGS IN NURSING HOME, NOT WHITE HOUSE

It was 2012. Rangel was out because of a back injury and a viral infection, which made it difficult for him to stand for long periods of time. From 2008 through late 2010, I dogged Rangel through the halls of Congress on a daily basis as the veteran congressman grappled with an ethics scandal. The ethics case culminated in the House censuring Rangel, permanently smudging his record as a war hero, a founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus and chairman of the Ways and Means Committee.

First elected to the House in 1970, Rangel’s star had dimmed after the ethics scandal. But in 2012, any information about an elderly, legendary congressman like Rangel was newsworthy. So, as a reporter on the Capitol Hill beat, I appreciated the phone call as he described the excruciating pain that beset him.

Advertisement

It’s possible the Ethics Committee investigation and censure by the House were more agonizing for Rangel than the back problem. Rangel was so confident that he didn’t violate House rules that he referred himself to the Ethics Committee.

Charlie Rangel

Rangel’s woes with the Ethics Committee might as well have been more painful for him than his back problems. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Rangel started to feel the ethics heat in 2008. He used his position as chairman of the Ways and Means Committee to solicit funds for a school in his name at City College of New York. He failed to report hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes or rental income on a villa he owned in the Dominican Republic. 

A rent-controlled apartment in Harlem doubled as a campaign office. He improperly parked his broken-down, 1972 silver Mercedes-Benz in the garage of the Rayburn House Office Building. The House prohibits lawmakers from using the garage for storage. The Benz lacked plates, wasn’t registered and apparently hadn’t been driven in about four years. A Falls Church, Virginia, towing company lugged the car out of the garage on Sept. 19, 2008.

Advertisement

Video of the tow-truck hauling away the Mercedes-Benz from Rayburn would have made a juicy story the next morning on TV. But Rangel caught a break.

Sort of.

VIRGINIA DEMOCRATIC REP GERRY CONNOLLY DEAD AT 75

Advertisement

Then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., summoned then-Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson to Capitol Hill that night. The U.S. economy teetered on the verge of an epic financial collapse. By nightfall, it was clear just how bad the nation’s economy was. Everyone temporarily forgot about Rangel. In fact, the inoperable Benz may have been in better shape than some American car companies at that moment.

But the House Ethics Committee was investigating Rangel. An inquiry started in 2009 and culminated in his censure on the House floor in 2010. The House voted 333-79 to discipline Rangel. A somber Rangel presented himself in the well of the House chamber, hands folded in front of him as though he were about to receive Communion. Pelosi doled out her admonition from the dais and lightly rapped the gavel.

«He violated the public trust,» said then-Ethics Committee Chairwoman Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif.

Advertisement

It was the first censure of a House member in 27 years.

Charlie Rangel

Years after the fact, I half-jokingly suggested that Rangel could blame his Ethics Committee problems on me. (Andrew Burton/Getty Images)

Years later, I half-jokingly told Rangel that he could blame me for his problems with the Ethics Committee.

As stated earlier, it was Rangel who believed his actions were beyond reproach. So he sent himself before the Ethics Committee to review his conduct.

Advertisement

I entered the Capitol one morning in 2008 and discovered his longtime aide, Emile Milne, wandering the basement. I asked Milne what he was looking for. He waived an overstuffed envelope at me.

«The Ethics Committee,» said Milne.

DEMOCRATS’ BOILING POT: A LOOK AT THEIR 2026 GAME PLAN

Advertisement

This was the actual «self-referral» to the Ethics Committee. And Milne was the courier of a dossier Rangel would use to defend himself.

I knew exactly where the Ethics Committee was located in those days in the Capitol catacombs. So I escorted Milne to the door.

As I said, I told Rangel he could blame all of his problems on me.

Advertisement
Rep. Charlie Rangel

I recall one instance in which Rangel, hounded by the press, fired back at them with his name, rank and serial number — the only things a prisoner of war is obliged to provide. (Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images)

Between 2008 and 2010, I staked out Rangel somewhere at the Capitol nearly every day. The day Pelosi summoned him to her office. The day Pelosi removed him as Ways and Means Committee chairman. The day he spoke at length on the House floor to defend himself against the allegations after the ethics panel formalized its inquiry.

One night, a scrum of reporters caught Rangel in the hallway off the House floor and pelted him with a barrage of questions. Rangel briefly answered. Then deflected. He then decided he had enough as scribes fired questions at him with the speed of a Gatling gun.

Rangel sighed, exasperated at what to do.

Advertisement

«Sergeant Charles B. Rangel. 85718162!» hollered Rangel. «And that’s all I’m going to say about it!»

It’s unclear if the other reporters understood what just happened. But I did.

BY DAWN’S EARLY LIGHT: BATTLES TRUMP’S ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’ WILL FACE IN THE SENATE

Advertisement

Rangel served in the Army during the Korean War. He was wounded in the back by shrapnel and eventually led dozens of men out of a firefight and to safety. Multiple soldiers died, and others were taken prisoner. Rangel received the Purple Heart and Bronze Star with valor.

Rangel survived that day. But back on Capitol Hill, the news cycle had effectively taken Rangel prisoner. So he complied with the terms of the Geneva Convention. A prisoner of war is only compelled to provide enemy captors their name, rank and serial number. And after absorbing heavy fire from the press corps, Rangel had only one option.

It’s notable that someone with Rangel’s military record and Army service passed away on Memorial Day.

Advertisement
Former Rep. Charles Rangel

Rangel, a decorated veteran, died on Memorial Day. (Seth Wenig-Pool/Getty Images)

In August 2008, Rangel published his autobiography entitled «And I Haven’t Had a Bad Day Since.» The book chronicles how a high school dropout joined the Army and was wounded on the battlefield. Rangel chose to continue — eventually winding up in Congress as one of the most important lawmakers of the last 50 years. But Rangel then faced one of the harshest punishments Congress could dole out. It cost him his chairmanship and upended his reputation.

But Rangel was often philosophical about his fate and transgressions in Congress. He argued that despite the trouble, he still hadn’t had a bad day since that fateful battle in Kunu-ri, Korea in late 1950.

Back in 2012, I may have been the only one who noticed that Rangel was absent when he was suffering from a back issue and viral infection.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

But I certainly won’t be the only one today.

Advertisement

Congress,New York,New York City,House of Representatives Democrats,House Of Representatives,Politics

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Schumer, Democrats try to save face, blame GOP for possible government shutdown

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Congressional Democrats are trying to get on the same page and display a unified front after threatening to derail the government funding process.

Advertisement

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., met behind closed doors Tuesday night, along with the top Democrats in the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, to plot a course forward in the forthcoming government funding fight.

SENATE WEATHERS DEM OPPOSITION, ADVANCES FIRST GOVERNMENT FUNDING BILL

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., turns to an aide during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Advertisement

The meeting came after Democrats in the upper chamber overwhelmingly supported the first government funding bill to hit the Senate floor, one that would fund military construction and Veterans Affairs. Ahead of the vote, Senate Democrats had signaled they may vote against the bill and further obstruct the appropriations process because of highly partisan legislation rammed through the upper chamber by Senate Republicans.

«We all want to pursue a bipartisan, bicameral appropriations process,» Schumer said. «That’s how it’s always been done, successfully, and we believe that, however, the Republicans are making it extremely difficult to do that.»

The meeting just off the Senate floor was meant to get congressional Democrats on board with a messaging plan over the next weeks and months ahead of the Sept. 30 deadline to fund the government.

Advertisement

CONGRESSIONAL REPUBLICANS FACE BRUISING BATTLE TO AVOID GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN

John Thune

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., is seen after the Senate luncheons in the U.S. Capitol on June 24, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

It was also likely designed to prevent a repeat of the Democratic debacle in March, when Schumer broke with Jeffries and threatened to shutter the government before ultimately caving and providing Republicans the votes necessary to advance yet another government funding extension, known as a continuing resolution.

Republicans are quick to point out that when Schumer led the upper chamber, none of the House GOP’s spending bills made it to the floor — in Congress, the spending process begins in the lower chamber.

Advertisement

Since taking over earlier this year, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has committed to returning to regular order, or passing each of the dozen spending bills to fund the government, and trying to get the appropriations process back to normal.

However, it’s a feat that hasn’t been successfully done in Washington since the late 1990s. 

«Frankly, I think a lot of us around here think [this] is long overdue,» Thune said.  

Advertisement

However, Democrats contend that their trust in Republicans is wearing thin after two major partisan bills, one being President Donald Trump’s «big, beautiful bill,» and the other the president’s $9 billion clawback package, were pushed through the chamber without any Democratic input.

‘BAIT AND SWITCH’: SCHUMER WARNS OF BITTER FUNDING FIGHT OVER GOP CUTS PLAN

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries

Representative Hakeem Jeffries, a Democrat from New York, speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 6, 2025. (Tierney L. Cross/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Thune argued that Senate Democrats were using the rescissions package to shut down the appropriations process and effectively shut down the government.

Advertisement

In the Senate, most bills that come to the floor require at least 60 votes to smash through the filibuster, meaning that most legislation requires bipartisan support to some extent.

Earlier this year, the House GOP produced a partisan government funding extension that was a tough pill for Senate Democrats to swallow, but they still ultimately opted to vote for it. This time around, they’re demanding more involvement in the process.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Jeffries said that congressional Democrats would play ball if the process was «bipartisan and bicameral in nature» and put the onus of a partial government shutdown at the feet of congressional Republicans.

«House Republicans are, in fact, marching us toward a possible government shutdown that will hurt the American people,» he said.

However, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., threw the responsibility on Democrats over whether the government would shutter or stay open come the end of September.

Advertisement

«They’re gaming out how they can shut the government down,» Johnson told Bloomberg Government. 

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Ucrania: el presidente Volodimir Zelenski enfrenta críticas y protestas por una nueva ley anticorrupción

Published

on


Activistas ucranianos convocaron más protestas este miércoles contra una ley que, según ellos, debilita los organismos anticorrupción del país, tras la primera gran manifestación contra el gobierno del país en más de tres años de guerra. La legislación también ha recibido críticas de funcionarios de la Unión Europea y grupos internacionales de derechos humanos.

El presidente, Volodimyi Zelenski, presionado porque la medida amenazaba con poner en peligro su apoyo público en un momento crítico de la guerra, citó a los jefes de las principales agencias anticorrupción y de seguridad de Ucrania el miércoles por la mañana en respuesta a la protesta contra su decisión de aprobar la nueva ley aprobada por el Parlamento.

Advertisement

“Todos escuchamos lo que dice la sociedad”, escribió Zelenski en Telegram después de la reunión. Sin embargo, insistió en que el nuevo marco legal era necesario para combatir más duramente la corrupción.

“Los casos penales no deberían prolongarse durante años sin veredictos, y aquellos que trabajan contra Ucrania no deben sentirse cómodos o inmunes al castigo”, dijo el líder ucraniano.

Dijo que todas las agencias gubernamentales acordaron trabajar de forma constructiva y responder a las expectativas públicas de equidad y eficacia. Se espera un plan de acción conjunto detallado dentro de dos semanas, destinado a abordar las debilidades institucionales, eliminar obstáculos legales y garantizar la justicia en todos los ámbitos, dijo.

Advertisement
Ucranianos protestan en la primera manifestación en tiempos de guerra contra una ley recién aprobada que limita la independencia de las instituciones anticorrupción. Foto Reuters

Miles de personas se reunieron en la capital y otras ciudades de Ucrania el martes por la noche para instar a Zelenski a vetar un controvertido proyecto de ley. Después de que Zelenski lo aprobara, los activistas convocaron en las redes sociales otra protesta en el centro de Kiev a las 8 de la tarde del miércoles.

La legislación endurece la supervisión gubernamental de dos agencias anticorrupción clave. Los críticos dicen que la medida podría debilitar significativamente la independencia de esas agencias y otorgar al círculo de Zelenski una mayor influencia sobre las investigaciones.

Advertencia de funcionarios de la UE

Advertisement

Combatir la corrupción arraigada es crucial para las aspiraciones de Ucrania de unirse a la UE y mantener el acceso a miles de millones de dólares en ayuda occidental en su lucha contra la invasión de tres años de Rusia.

“Limitar la independencia de la agencia anticorrupción de Ucrania obstaculiza el camino de Ucrania hacia la UE”, advirtió este miércoles el ministro de Asuntos Exteriores de Alemania, Johann Wadephul, en una publicación en X.

El comisario de Defensa de la UE, Andrius Kubilius, señaló también en X que: “En la guerra, la confianza entre la nación combatiente y su liderazgo es más importante que las armas modernas. Difícil de construir y mantener, pero fácil de perder con un error significativo del liderazgo”.

Advertisement
El presidente ucraniano, Volodimir Zelenski, convocó a los jefes de todas las agencias de investigación y de lucha contra la corrupción del país. Foto EFEEl presidente ucraniano, Volodimir Zelenski, convocó a los jefes de todas las agencias de investigación y de lucha contra la corrupción del país. Foto EFE

La rama ucraniana de Transparencia Internacional criticó la decisión del Parlamento, diciendo que socava una de las reformas más significativas desde lo que Ucrania llama su Revolución de la Dignidad en 2014, y daña la confianza con los socios internacionales. Acusó a las autoridades de “desmantelar” la arquitectura anticorrupción del país.

Zelenski ha sido el rostro internacional de la determinación de Ucrania ante la invasión total de Rusia, y sus problemas internos son una distracción no deseada del esfuerzo de guerra.

Zelenski dijo que la medida elimina la “influencia rusa” de la lucha contra la corrupción y garantiza el castigo para aquellos que sean encontrados culpables de ella, después de lo que él describió como retrasos de años en procedimientos penales que involucran enormes cantidades de dinero.

“Los casos que se han quedado parados deben ser investigados”, dijo Zelenski en una publicación de Telegram después de la medianoche del miércoles. “Durante años, funcionarios que han huido de Ucrania han estado viviendo casualmente en el extranjero por alguna razón, en países muy agradables y sin consecuencias legales, y esto no es normal”, dijo. No proporcionó ejemplos de lo que dijo era interferencia rusa.

Advertisement

Las autoridades rusas disfrutaron de las dificultades de Zelenski. La portavoz del Ministerio ruso de Exteriores, María Zajárova, se burló de las afirmaciones de Zelenski sobre la infiltración rusa en la agencia anticorrupción, señalando sarcásticamente que “también podrían sacar un par de osos de la esquina”.

Negociaciones en Estambul

Delegaciones de Rusia y Ucrania tenían previsto reunirse en Estambul este miércoles para su tercera ronda de conversaciones directas en dos meses, dijeron funcionarios del Kremlin y ucranianos. No se esperaba que la reunión lograra progresos en poner fin a la guerra y probablemente se centraría en los intercambios de prisioneros de guerra.

Advertisement

Los cambios legislativos otorgarían al fiscal general nueva autoridad sobre las investigaciones y casos manejados por la Oficina Nacional Anticorrupción de Ucrania (NABU) y la Oficina del Fiscal Especializado en Anticorrupción (SAPO).

El ambiente de ira y frustración entre los ucranianos cansados de la guerra prevaleció en la multitud el martes. Algunos manifestantes acusaron a los líderes de Ucrania de priorizar la lealtad y las conexiones personales sobre la lucha contra la corrupción.

“Aquellos que juraron proteger las leyes y la Constitución han elegido en su lugar proteger a su círculo íntimo, incluso a expensas de la democracia ucraniana”, dijo el veterano Oleh Symoroz, sentado en una silla de ruedas porque le amputaron ambas piernas después de ser herido en 2022.

Advertisement

Ucrania,Volodímir Zelenski,Rusia,Guerra Rusia-Ucrania

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump admin official to meet with Israel, Qatar amid push for Gaza ceasefire

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Special Envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to meet with Israeli and Qatari officials in Rome on Thursday as the U.S. pushes for a ceasefire deal in Gaza. 

Advertisement

Hamas and Israel are engaging in indirect negotiations to end the war that has raged on for nearly two years. However, Witkoff’s itinerary depends on the progress made in the talks. If the parties make enough progress in Rome, Witkoff will reportedly travel to Doha to finalize the deal, according to Axios. 

The outlet also reported that sources indicated the meeting in Rome could suggest that a deal is near — possibly just days away.

Earlier this month, Israel agreed to a U.S.-backed, 60-day ceasefire proposal that would lead to the end of the war. This deal includes a phased release of hostages, the withdrawal of Israeli troops from parts of Gaza and talks on ending the conflict, according to Reuters.

Advertisement

Special Envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to meet with Israeli and Qatari officials in Rome on Thursday to secure a deal to end the war in Gaza. (Dawoud Abo Alkas/Anadolu/Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

ISRAEL, HAMAS TALKS DRAG AS AID GROUP CHAIR TELLS UN TO STOP ACTING LIKE THE ‘MAFIA’

«My representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza. Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the war. The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring peace, will deliver this final proposal. I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this deal because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE,» President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on July 1.

Advertisement
President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dine together in Washington, D.C.

President Donald Trump holds a bilateral dinner with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in attendance, at the White House in Washington, D.C., July 7, 2025. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

ISRAEL ACCEPTS TRUMP-LED CEASEFIRE PLAN THAT COULD END GAZA WAR WITHIN 60 DAYS

Trump appeared optimistic about the possibility of Israel and Hamas reaching a deal to end the war. On July 16, while signing the HALT Fentanyl Act, Trump thanked Witkoff, praising him for doing «a fantastic job» and said that there was «some good news on Gaza,» though he did not elaborate.

Abraham Accords signing

From left to right, Foreign Affairs Minister of Bahrain Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani, Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu, President Donald Trump and Foreign Affairs Minister of the United Arab Emirates Abdullah bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan participate in the signing ceremony of the Abraham Accords on the South Lawn of the White House on Sept. 15, 2020, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

TRUMP PRESSURES ISRAEL TO END GAZA CONFLICT AS HE EYES ABRAHAM ACCORDS EXPANSION

Advertisement

If Trump can secure an end to the war, it could mean an expansion of the Abraham Accords, one of the signature efforts of Trump’s first administration, which saw Israel sign normalization agreements with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan. However, Trump has yet to detail which countries would be added.

Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Gideon Sa’ar said on June 30 that Israel was «serious» about seeking an end to the conflict. He added that Jerusalem has an interest in «countries, such as Syria and Lebanon, our neighbors, to the circle of peace and normalization.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Greg Wehner and Caitlin McFall contributed to this report.


Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias