Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

State Department now scrutinizing all visa holders associated with Harvard

Published

on


Senior State Department officials tell Fox News all visa holders associated with Harvard University are being scrutinized, not just student visa holders.

Along with student visas, the State Department will be conducting a substantive investigation into B-1, or business visas; B-2, or tourist visas; as well as others, officials said.

Advertisement

The investigation is aimed at identifying potential security vulnerabilities or other abuses of the visa system.

The probe could impact hundreds of people associated with the elite school and could reveal if people entering with claimed connections truly have real connections or more tenuous connections.

TRUMP ADMIN ASKING FEDERAL AGENCIES TO CANCEL REMAINING HARVARD CONTRACTS

Advertisement

The State Department will begin scrutinizing all visa holders associated with Harvard University, not just student visa holders. (Blake Nissen for The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

Fox News Digital learned earlier in the day that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is eliminating the student visa program at Harvard University due to «pro-terrorist conduct» at campus protests.

The move is a severe consequence in response to what the DHS claims is Harvard’s refusal to comply with its requests for behavioral records of student visa holders.

Advertisement

«This administration is holding Harvard accountable for fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus,» DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said. «It is a privilege, not a right, for universities to enroll foreign students and benefit from their higher tuition payments to help pad their multibillion-dollar endowments. Harvard had plenty of opportunity to do the right thing. It refused. They have lost their Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification as a result of their failure to adhere to the law. Let this serve as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country.»

TRUMP ACCUSES HARVARD OF BEING ‘VERY SLOW’ TO TURN OVER FOREIGN STUDENT INFO

Harvard protester waves Palestinian flag

Demonstrators gather on Cambridge Common to protest Harvard’s stance on the war in Gaza and show support for the Palestinian people, outside Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, April 25, 2025.  (JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images)

Harvard may no longer enroll foreign students in the 2025-2026 school year, and existing foreign students must transfer or lose their legal status to reside in the U.S. before the next academic year begins. 

Advertisement

«As a result of your brazen refusal to comply with multiple requests to provide the Department of Homeland Security pertinent information while perpetuating an unsafe campus environment that is hostile to Jewish students, promotes pro-Hamas rhetoric, and employs racist ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ policies, you have lost this privilege,» Noem wrote in a letter to Maureen Martin, the university’s director of immigration services. 

Noem offered Harvard 72 hours to provide the information requested for an opportunity to regain its visa program for the next school year. 

HARVARD SUES TRUMP ADMINISTRATION OVER TERMINATION OF STUDENT VISA PROGRAM

Advertisement
Harvard graduation anti-Israel protest

Hundreds of graduates walked out of the 2024 Commencement in Harvard Yard to call attention to the plight of Palestinians.  (Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

She called the move the «direct result of Harvard’s epic failure to comply with simple reporting requirements.» 

Harvard, meanwhile, asserted the termination was «unlawful.» 

Last month, Harvard announced it would allow foreign students to accept admission to both Harvard and a foreign university as backup amid the Trump administration’s threats to move to block Harvard’s authorization to host them. Typically, students must accept enrollment at Harvard by May 1 and can’t commit to another university. 

Advertisement

At least a dozen Harvard students have had their authorization to study in the U.S. revoked over campus protest activity. 

The Trump administration has already frozen close to $3 billion in federal funding to the university, largely dedicated to research, and launched investigations across the departments of Justice, Education and Health and Human Services. They claim that Harvard has failed to address campus antisemitism and eradicate Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) in its policies.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Wednesday the U.S. will begin «aggressively» revoking visas of Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.

He also told Congress this week that the State Department had probably revoked «thousands» of student visas by this point and would «proudly» revoke more. 

«We’re going to continue to revoke the visas of people who are here as guests and are disrupting our higher education facilities,» he said Tuesday. «A visa is a privilege, not a right.» 

Advertisement

The crackdown on university policies comes after a wave of pro-Gaza student protests and encampments swept schools across the nation since the beginning of Israel’s offensive campaign to eradicate Hamas after the Oct. 7 attacks to pressure university administrations to divest from Israel. 

Fox News Digital’s Morgan Phillips contributed to this report.

Advertisement

State Department,Immigration,Foreign Affairs,Homeland Security,College

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Lethal elite ‘black-clad’ kill squad guards Iran’s new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

An elite counterterrorism unit has been deployed to protect Iran’s newly appointed Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, following the assassination of his father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Fox News Digital has learned.

Advertisement

The force, known as NOPO — Iran’s black-clad Counterterrorism Special Force — was assigned to safeguard the leader after a U.S.-Israel strike on a Tehran compound on Feb. 28 killed the elder Khamenei amid the start of Operation Epic Fury.

«With Khamenei gone, NOPO will likely now be protecting Mojtaba Khamenei,» Ali Safavi, an official with the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Paris-based National Council of Resistance of Iran, or NCRI said.

The NOPO force, formed in 1991, had the 28th Ruhollah (Khomeini’s first name) Division as its «nucleus», according to Safavi, and typically handles hostage rescue operations. «Its task was not to protect Khamenei,» he added.

Advertisement

IRAN’S NEW SUPREME LEADER IS ‘HIS FATHER ON STEROIDS,’ EXPERTS WARN OF HARDLINE RULE

Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei receives protection from elite NOPO force following his father’s assassination in U.S.-Israel attack on Tehran compound Feb. 28. ( Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

The history of the unit also includes deployments against internal security threats, and it has often been called on to suppress protests.

Advertisement

Iran’s Assembly of Experts elected Mojtaba Khamenei on March 8, 2026, elevating him as the third Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic.

His succession comes amid ongoing war with the U.S. and Israel, but so far, Mojtaba Khamenei has not been heard from since the start of the conflict.

According to The Times of Israel, Iranian state television reported that Mojtaba Khamenei was wounded in the war, with the reports yet unconfirmed.

Advertisement

«NOPO is the Farsi acronym for Nirouyeh Vijeh Pasdaran Velayat, which translates into the Special Force to Protect the Supreme Leader,» Safavi further explained before clarifying that «Velayat is not necessarily the supreme leader, but the entirety of the regime.»

IRAN POSTPONES TEHRAN FAREWELL CEREMONY FOR KHAMENEI WHERE LARGE CROWDS WERE EXPECTED TO GATHER

Mojtaba Khamenei

Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of the Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is seen in Tehran, Iran, on Dec. 14, 2016.  (Reza B / Middle East Images / AFP via Getty Images)

Over time, NOPO has evolved into a highly specialized unit distinct from the broader Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the military branch established in 1979 to defend the Islamic Republic and its leadership from internal and external threats.

Advertisement

«The NOPO is composed of six brigades only. Four are stationed in Tehran, one in Mashhad and one in Isfahan,» Safavi said.

«They are far more lethal, ruthless and well-trained than the IRGC,» he claimed before describing how the brigade’s loyalty was to the Supreme Leader.

«This force was used for the protection of Khamenei,» Safavi continued. «They are very well-equipped. Khamenei did not trust any other security force for his protection.»

Advertisement

Safavi also said some members of the unit were likely killed in Ali Khamenei’s assassination but that the force remains fully operational.

«Some of the NOPO could have been killed when Khamenei was killed, but the fact is that they are now involved in the suppressive and security measures the regime has also undertaken in recent days to prevent any outbreak of protests,» Safavi said.

The elite force’s activities extend beyond personal protection in times of crisis, Safavi added.

Advertisement

KHAMENEI’S DEATH OPENS UNCERTAIN CHAPTER FOR IRAN’S ENTRENCHED THEOCRACY

tear gas is fired during an anti-government in Iran

In this photo obtained by The Associated Press, tear gas is fired during an anti-government protest in Tehran, Iran, Thursday, Jan. 8, 2026.  (UGC via AP)

«But in times of crisis, such as what happened during the January uprising, they were heavily involved in opening fire on the protesters,» he said.

This comes amid reports that hundreds of NOPO members have also been widely deployed around prisons in Iran that are holding political detainees.

Advertisement

«Hundreds of suppressive forces are widely deployed around the prison. In Ghezel Hesar Prison,» the NCRI said in a statement.

On Tuesday, March 3, 2026, following the bombing of a military center near Mahabad Prison, prisoners whose ward doors had been locked protested and set fire to their blankets, demanding their release under wartime conditions.

«Suppressive forces responded by firing tear gas into the ward,» the NCRI reported.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Reports also indicated NOPO had taken control of Evin Prison in Tehran following the flight of regular prison officials amid intensified conflict.

In 2021, the U.S. Treasury Department imposed sanctions on NOPO for its part in committing «serious human rights abuses against persons in Iran or Iranian citizens or residents, or the family members of the foregoing.»

Advertisement



war with iran,mojtaba khamenei,iran,ali khamenei,sanctions,wars,counter terrorism

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Minnesota Dem suggests studying ‘benefit of shoplifting’ in committee clash, then says it was sarcasm

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Minnesota Democrat whose retort to a Republican about potential «benefit[s] of shoplifting» during a hearing on worker misclassification defended the exchange as sarcasm gone awry.

Advertisement

During a Minnesota House Workforce and Labor Committee hearing this week, lawmakers reviewed information on how laws governing employee and independent contractor classifications affect insurance payments and other benefits, according to local reports.

State Rep. Dave Pinto, D-St. Paul, responded after a Republican lawmaker voiced concern that worker misclassification ultimately falls on the taxpayer.

«It is an intriguing line of questions,» Pinto said, appearing to suggest a study on the «benefit of shoplifting and retail theft.»

Advertisement

WATCH: WALZ, ELLISON, OMAR REFUSE TO ANSWER WHEN PRESSED ON FRAUD AFTER CONTENTIOUS FRAUD HEARING

A suspect is taken into custody outside a big-box store in California on an unspecified date. (Will Lester/Getty Images)

Pinto spoke of a recent presentation before another committee he sits on that sought to address solutions to organized retail theft.

Advertisement

«And it actually had not occurred to me to ask — it probably would have been good — to make sure that they would study sort of the benefit of shoplifting, of retail theft since because perhaps people are relying on that and sort of using that maybe it’s you know assisting them in some way,» he said.

Pinto went on to describe whether people involved in such activities are considered to be violating the law, and that there may be a policy question at the root of such a discussion.

In comments to Fox News Digital, Pinto defended the remarks, saying he was reacting sarcastically to Rep. Isaac Schultz, R-Mille Lacs, who had posed the original question.

Advertisement

«My comments, intended to be sarcastic, followed a line of questioning from Republican Rep. Isaac Schultz suggesting a study is needed on whether the illegal practice of worker misclassification harms consumers,» Pinto said.

«As a prosecutor, of course I take retail theft and shoplifting seriously. Any insinuation to the contrary is absurd — just like Rep. Schultz’s remarks were.»

NEARLY ALL SUSPECTS ARRESTED IN ST PAUL CHURCH STORMING; MLK’S NIECE SAYS HOSTILE TACTICS ‘NOT THE WAY’

Advertisement

Nonetheless, Pinto’s original comment was viewed thousands of times on social media and elicited responses from other lawmakers, amid ongoing scrutiny over social services fraud and other scandals in the Land of 10,000 Lakes.

State Rep. Krista Knudsen, R-Lake Shore, was rendered speechless in a video response to the matter, as she put her hands to her face.

«There are no benefits to shoplifting for the people that are being shoplifted from. I have no idea what else to say,» Knudsen said. «I’m shocked, actually. I don’t even know what to say. Who — I don’t know what to say — Who benefits from shoplifting? The criminals.»

Advertisement

State Rep. Kristin Robbins, a Republican from the Minneapolis area, appeared to cite her region’s nationally recognized scandals, saying she cannot believe the comment was made by Pinto.

«[W]e are trying to prevent fraud and prevent crime in Minnesota and this has been an issue that we’ve dealt with as a legislature for many years. We finally got the organized retail theft crime in statute last session,» she said.

«It’s been a long haul and that’s a tool that we need to crack down on this real problem throughout our communities around the state.»

Advertisement

Worker misclassification has been a focus of Democrat-Farmer-Labor lawmakers in the state legislature for some time, as an effort began in 2024 to ban employers from misclassifying employees.

ILLEGAL’S DRAGGING OF ICE AGENT SHOWS THE EXACT DANGER THE OFFICER WHO SHOT RENEE GOOD FEARED, EXPERT SAYS

That policy was reportedly spurred by a construction worker who testified before lawmakers that he racked up major medical bills after a work-related injury, but his employer later only offered him a small amount for expenses and «told him to forget about insurance and to change his name and address, saying the bills would eventually disappear if nobody paid them,» according to a post on the House of Representatives website.

Advertisement

The man later allegedly found out his employer was misclassifying employees in order to save on labor costs, according to the lawmakers’ page.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

State Rep. Emma Greenman, D-Minneapolis, authored HF4444 to ensure businesses don’t act in such a way in the future and/or misclassify employees as contractors or the like.

Advertisement

«Our job is to ensure that Minnesota workers have the protections that we in law provide,» she said at the time.

republicans,minneapolis st paul,minnesota,democrats,robbery theft

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Apenas un respiro

Published

on


La candidata presidencial del partido Centro Democrático, Paloma Valencia, habla después de ganar la consulta de la derecha, en Bogotá, Colombia, 8 de marzo , 2026. REUTERS/Luisa González

De todas partes del mundo me escriben sobre las elecciones en Colombia del fin de semana pasado. ¿Qué pasó? ¿Para dónde va Colombia? ¿Y a la derecha y al centro derecha cómo le fue? La respuesta: bien y mal.

Mal, porque los resultados mostraron que Colombia sigue en un inmenso riesgo de avanzar por el camino populista, pues esa izquierda se fortaleció en el Congreso y mostró que Iván Cepeda es un candidato muy fuerte y sin rival en ese espectro político, lo que no sucede ni con el centro ni con la derecha. Bien, porque la Gran Consulta del centro y la centro derecha se convirtió, por un lado, en la más votada de la historia, con 5.8 millones de votos, y mostró el camino para derrotar a la izquierda radical: unirse y atraer al centro es la consigna para la primera vuelta presidencial.

Advertisement

¿Entonces? Lo primero es que aquello que querían Gustavo Petro, Iván Cepeda y Abelardo de la Espriella, no tener competencia en mayo, en la primera vuelta presidencial, no se les dio. Paloma Valencia, con esos millones de votos de la consulta, se confirmó como una rival muy fuerte para los dos candidatos radicales, e incluso la posibilidad de que ella, como la candidata del centro y la derecha, llegue a la segunda vuelta es alta, si hace las cosas bien en estos meses de campaña.

Paloma Valencia, con esos millones
Paloma Valencia, con esos millones de votos de la consulta, se confirmó como una rival muy fuerte para los dos candidatos radicales- crédito Paloma Valencia

¿Qué es hacer las cosas bien? Por un lado, hay que cultivar el centro, para mantener esos votos y, además, hacerlos crecer en las zonas donde se puede y con los sectores sociales, en especial los jóvenes urbanos, a los que no les llegamos y que Juan Daniel Oviedo logró encantar. No podemos esperar un segundo para comenzar a entender a ese joven urbano al que Oviedo le habló, para ampliarnos en esa base, y debemos enfocar los esfuerzos principalmente en Bogotá.

Paloma debe dejar el discurso tradicional del uribismo y empezar a leer mejor este momento del país. No quiere decir, de ninguna manera, que se olvide de los temas de seguridad y otros que hacen parte de su agenda, pero sí que entienda que el discurso anticomunista tradicional ya no mueve a nadie, o a los que mueve ya los movió. Ojalá Oviedo y Paloma entiendan lo que está en juego, y logren un buen entendimiento para que, por un lado, nos salvemos de las garras del populismo y, por el otro, se hagan las muchas reformas que necesita el país.

Iván Cepeda, sin duda, sigue muy pero muy fuerte. ¿Podrá arrancar más votos de los que ya tiene en el centro? Depende de Claudia López, quien ya dejó en claro que quiere llegar allá, de Sergio Fajardo y de todos los candidatos de la Gran Consulta. Pronto vamos a ver en las nuevas encuestas, que quedaron todas muy mal paradas, aunque unas peor que otras, qué tanto los resultados del domingo cambiaron el escenario político.

Advertisement
Iván Cepeda. REUTERS/Luisa Gonzalez
Iván Cepeda. REUTERS/Luisa Gonzalez

Obvio, hay que mirar esos datos con pinzas y tener en cuenta que no van a incluir las fórmulas a la Vicepresidencia de los candidatos, que también marcan algo de diferencia. ¿Qué pasa si en esas encuestas Paloma pasa a tener entre el 15 y el 20 por ciento? ¿O si tiene alrededor del 10?

Ya veremos cómo lo que sucedió en estas consultas cambió o no el panorama político y si generó una competencia más abierta y con mayores posibilidades para que el centro sea definitivo en la decisión presidencial. Por ahora, se abre una esperanza de que la polarización es evitable y que la centro derecha puede jugar un papel realista en las elecciones de mayo.

Otra cosa es lo que pasó con el voto para el Congreso, en el cual, sin duda, el Pacto Histórico mostró fuerza y disciplina; no nos digamos mentiras, ya es la primera fuerza política del país. Lo grave, es que, si sumamos los congresistas de otros partidos que se van a vender, pueden tener más de la mitad del congreso, y eso quiere decir que si gana Cepeda vamos a tener Constituyente, leyes que destruyan de manera definitiva el sistema de salud y unos impuestos que acaben con el sector privado.

El Centro Democrático subió, pero,
El Centro Democrático subió, pero, la verdad, su lista al Senado dejó mucho que desear. No hubo una figura nueva que moviera ese grupo, distinta a Álvaro Uribe.

El Centro Democrático subió, pero, la verdad, su lista al Senado dejó mucho que desear. No hubo una figura nueva que moviera ese grupo, distinta a Álvaro Uribe. Muchos llegaron en coche y, si bien pueden ser buenos senadores, nunca van a tener su propio escenario político. El 90 por ciento de los senadores electos por el centro democrático, no lo hubieran sido sin Uribe.

Es hora de crear un partido que no sea Uribe dependiente, y en estos dificilísimos cuatro años, convertir al CD en ese partido va a ser un reto gigante. Lo que queda claro es que si no se hace, el Centro Democrático desaparece y ante la fortaleza de la izquierda no hay contrapeso alguno. La responsabilidad histórica en ese sentido es enorme.

Advertisement

Comienza la recta final. El futuro de Colombia está en juego y Paloma se montó en la elección presidencial. Unidos en la segunda vuelta podemos evitar la catástrofe. Ese debe ser el objetivo de todos. ¿Seremos tan responsables? Ojalá la sensatez prevalezca sobre el ego.



South America / Central America,Elections / Voting

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias