Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Chinese nationals who infiltrated US universities

Published

on


The Trump administration has intensified its scrutiny of Chinese nationals studying at U.S. universities after several instances in recent years of students from the communist country engaging in alleged surreptitious activity while in the United States.

The incidents, which have involved allegations of espionage, conspiracy and accusations of misleading federal officials, occurred as a result of Chinese nationals or others with Chinese ties participating in joint education programs between the United States and China.

Advertisement

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Wednesday the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security plan to «aggressively revoke» student visas of Chinese nationals, «including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party.»

A Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson blasted the new policy in a statement Thursday on X, saying the move was «fully unjustified» and damaging to the United States’ reputation.

STATE DEPARTMENT SAYS IT WILL ‘AGGRESSIVELY REVOKE’ VISAS OF CHINESE STUDENTS

Advertisement

Secretary of State Marco Rubio testifies before a Senate Committee on Foreign Relations hearing to examine the president’s proposed budget request for fiscal year 2026 for the Department of State on Capitol Hill in Washington May 20, 2025.  (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

«Citing ideology and national security as a pretext, the move seriously hurts the lawful rights and interests of international students from China and disrupts people-to-people exchanges between the two countries,» spokesperson Lin Jian said.

Nearly 300,000 Chinese nationals have student visas in the United States. It is unclear if the State Department plans to target all of them or only some. Fox News Digital reached out to the department for clarity.

Advertisement

Below is a look at some recent incidents involving Chinese nationals at universities.

Five Chinese nationals involved in Camp Grayling incident

The DOJ brought charges against five University of Michigan students last year after a sergeant major encountered them at Camp Grayling in 2023.

The students had cameras with them and were discovered as the U.S. National Guard was conducting a massive training operation at the site with Taiwanese military members, according to a complaint.

Advertisement

They were all Chinese nationals attending the University of Michigan as part of the school’s joint program with a Shanghai-based university, an FBI official wrote in the complaint, noting some of them had taken photos of Camp Grayling’s military installations and operations.

A split of Marco Rubio and Xi Jinping

Marco Rubio and Xi Jinping (Getty Images)

The FBI asked the court to issue arrest warrants for the students for making false statements and destroying records.

Chinese nationals breach Key West military base

Two Chinese nationals who were graduate students at the University of Michigan pleaded guilty in 2020 after they were caught illegally entering and photographing defense infrastructure at a naval air station in Key West, Florida.

Advertisement

University of Minnesota student

Fengyun Shi, a Chinese national studying at the University of Minnesota, was convicted in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia last year of unlawfully using a drone to take photos of naval bases in Norfolk, Virginia.

Shi was sentenced to six months in prison and a year of supervised release, and the Biden administration revoked his visa in response to the charges. ICE announced in May that it deported him to China.

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION BEGINS NEW WAVE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDENT VISA REVOCATIONS: ‘NO ONE HAS A RIGHT TO A VISA’

Advertisement
Fengyun Shi (ICE)

Harvard chemistry department chair

While not a Chinese national, Charles Lieber, former chair of Harvard’s chemistry department, was convicted in 2021 of making false statements to authorities and failing to report income from his work with China’s Wuhan University of Technology and a contract he had with China’s Thousand Talents Program.

Espionage attempt

Ji Chaoqun, a Chinese national and one-time student at the Illinois Institute of Technology, was sentenced to eight years in prison after he was convicted by a jury in 2022 of attempting to commit espionage and theft of trade secrets.

Ji was found to have gathered information on defense contractors, engineers and others as part of a broader effort by high-level Chinese intelligence officials to obtain inside access to U.S. technology advancements.

Advertisement

Rubio’s announcement also comes after Harvard filed a lawsuit alleging the Trump administration improperly banned all foreign nationals from the Ivy League school by revoking its student visa certification. A judge temporarily blocked the administration from carrying out the ban as the case plays out in the courts.

STATE DEPARTMENT NOW SCRUTINIZING ALL VISA HOLDERS ASSOCIATED WITH HARVARD

Harvard University banners hang in May 2025

Banners at the Harry Elkins Widener Memorial Library on the Harvard University campus in Cambridge, Mass., Tuesday, May 27, 2025. (Sophie Park/Bloomberg)

ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons told Harvard in a letter made public through court filings that the revocation was a result of the alleged prevalence of antisemitism on campus but also a result of the administration’s «serious concerns» that the university has «coordinated with the Chinese Communist Party.»

Advertisement

Lyons cited several examples, including Harvard accepting $151 million from foreign donors since 2020, working with «China-based academics» on projects funded by an «Iranian government agent,» partnering with Chinese universities and using public funds to do so and collaborating with people «linked to China’s defense-industrial base.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«This coordination is a valid and substantive reason for withdrawing Harvard University’s [Student Exchange Visitor Program] certification to enroll foreign students,» Lyons wrote.

Advertisement

Harvard attorneys argued during a court hearing Thursday that the Trump administration did not give the university a chance to rebut the claims about antisemitism and CCP ties before the foreign student ban was enacted. The administration agreed to give Harvard one month to respond to those claims while the ban remains on hold.

China,US Education,State Department,Immigration,U.S. Defense & Military Politics

INTERNACIONAL

Reporter’s Notebook: Clintons call for open Epstein files hearing after months of defying subpoenas

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Since there was such a tempest over Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show, perhaps there’s a solution at hand. This compromise would satisfy both red and blue America. And the exhibition would transfix the country: Have former President Bill Clinton and President Donald Trump testify at halftime about the Epstein files.

Advertisement

Republicans believe former President Clinton has something to hide about Jeffrey Epstein. Democrats think the same about President Trump. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the former president and Hillary Clinton to testify about the Epstein files. After a lot of wrangling, the Clintons are due to appear for closed-door depositions later this month.

But both Bill and Hillary Clinton are now calling for open sessions. And Democrats believe that such an appearance at a public session — by a former President — would establish a precedent to lug in President Trump to answer questions about what he knew about Epstein.

GHISLAINE MAXWELL TO APPEAR BEFORE HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE LAWMAKERS FOR EPSTEIN PROBE DEPOSITION

Advertisement

Hillary Clinton addresses her staff and supporters about the results of the U.S. election as her husband, former U.S. President Bill Clinton, applauds at a hotel in the Manhattan borough of New York, Nov. 9, 2016.  (Reuters/Carlos Barria)

One architect of the law compelling the release of the Epstein files, applauded demands last week by the former First Couple to testify at a televised open hearing. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said the former president is an important witness.

«As long as [the hearing is] focused on Epstein, and it’s not a wild goose chase — it’s not trying to score political points or embarrass either President Clinton or President Trump, it is asking legitimate questions about what they knew took place and who they knew were participating in heinous acts,» said Khanna. «That should be a legitimate point of inquiry.»

Advertisement

After agreeing to a closed-door deposition later this month, Hillary Clinton took to X. She wrote to Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., saying, «If you want this fight let’s have it in public.» 

Former President Clinton echoed his wife the next day on X, also calling for a public session. The former commander-in-chief declared that he won’t be used «as a prop in a closed door Kangaroo Court.» 

A spokeswoman for Comer accused the former first couple of «moving the goalposts.» Comer was always open to a hearing. But after a closed-door deposition.

Advertisement

«Depositions have historically been much more substantive than hearings,» said Comer. «Hearings unfortunately, have become more of an entertainment thing.»

It’s hard to track exactly what the Clintons wanted.

The House Oversight Committee voted on a bipartisan basis last August to subpoena both Bill and Hillary Clinton for depositions — along with a host of other prominent figures like former Attorney General Bill Barr. After a lot of haggling, the committee subpoenaed them to appear at dates in October. The Clintons defied those. Then the committee assigned them dates just before Christmas. But neither showed then because of a funeral. The committee requested that the Clintons give them dates for January appearances. They didn’t. The committee then assigned them additional dates for January testimony. They skipped out on those. That’s when Comer threatened to hold the Clintons in contempt of Congress if they didn’t appear in January. The Oversight Committee voted — in bipartisan fashion — for contempt. The House Rules Committee planned last week to prep a measure to force the entire House to vote on contempt — and send criminal referrals for the Clintons to the Justice Department for prosecution after they defied the subpoenas.

Advertisement

REVEALED: TRUMP CALLED POLICE CHIEF TO SUPPORT EPSTEIN PROBE, AND LAWMAKERS NAMED 6 MEN SHIELDED FROM EXPOSURE

Comer addresses the press after Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., alongside Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., left, speaks to reporters after a closed-door deposition with Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend and confidante of sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 9, 2026. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

But the Clintons finally agreed to depositions at the end of this month. And once that was on the calendar, the duo began calling for public hearings.

There is a method behind this madness. There isn’t a loyalty among younger Congressional Democrats to the Clintons. In fact, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was steamed at some Democrats for wanting the Clintons to appear. Younger Democrats don’t have the same reverence for the Clintons as older Democrats. Hillary Clinton ran for president a decade ago. She hasn’t been a senator since 2009. She last served as Secretary of State in early 2013. President Clinton left the Oval Office more than a quarter-century ago.

Advertisement

However, this is the Democrats’ gambit:

If former President Clinton appears about the Epstein files, it may be tough to make the case that President Trump shouldn’t appear.

«Certainly it does set the precedent. President Trump was subpoenaed during the January 6th investigations and didn’t come in. He cited some form of executive privilege. And so we’re kind of forcing the Clintons to come in with the threat of criminal contempt. Then that is a precedent that we are setting,» said Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, D-Va. «In other countries, like the UK, the Prime Minister regularly comes before the Parliament. And so it’s not like it’s unprecedented around the world.»

Advertisement

Granted, that’s a parliamentary system where the prime minister is a member of Parliament in the United Kingdom. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer regularly appears for «Prime Minister’s Questions» every Wednesday at noon in London. Members of Parliament usually pepper the prime minister with questions and scoff in a scene which resembles something out of Monty Python.

But the American and British systems are fundamentally different.

Getting a sitting or former President — and even first lady — before Congress is rare but not unheard of.

Advertisement

BONDI TO FACE GRILLING IN HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OVER EPSTEIN FILES, WEAPONIZATION ALLEGATIONS

Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein

Former President Bill Clinton was seen in photos with Jeffrey Epstein as part of a DOJ Epstein files release on Friday, Dec. 19. (Department of Justice)

There are three prominent examples of sitting Presidents appearing before Congress. President Abraham Lincoln testified voluntarily before the House Judiciary Committee in 1862. The New York Herald published his «State of the Union» message to Congress just before it was sent to Capitol Hill. Presidents sent written «reports» in those days. They did not give speeches to Congress. Lawmakers probed the leak of the message to Congress. It was speculated that Herald reporter Henry Wikoff got the message ahead of time thanks to his friendship with Mary Todd Lincoln. The House Sergeant at Arms briefly held Wikoff — and released him after the president spoke to the Judiciary Committee.

President Woodrow Wilson appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1919 to discuss a treaty with Germany and establishing the League of Nations. Wilson’s push for the League of Nations failed. The Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles.

Advertisement

President Gerald Ford had been in office two-and-a-half months before he appeared voluntarily before the House Judiciary Committee in the fall of 1974. Ford told lawmakers that his pardon of former President Richard Nixon wasn’t something they bargained about. Ford told the committee that he pardoned Nixon because his physical and mental health fell into a steep decline.

Former President Harry Truman appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1955 to testify about the United Nations Charter.

Ford came back as a former president in 1983 for a Senate hearing on the bicentennial of the Constitution.

Advertisement

And there are examples of both sitting and former first ladies testifying, too.

Eleanor Roosevelt testified twice as first lady. Once about labor issues. Then, about the organization of volunteers for the civilian defense agency before World War II.

Rosalynn Carter testified about mental health as first lady.

Advertisement

Hillary Clinton famously testified about her husband’s health care plan — even though it was dubbed (often derisively) «Hillarycare» in the fall of 1993. She testified multiple times as Secretary of State. Most notably in early 2013 regarding Benghazi. 

And, first lady Laura Bush was en route to Capitol Hill to testify before a Senate panel about early childhood education on 9/11. The committee cancelled the hearing after the attacks in New York and at the Pentagon. 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

So, many Republicans are game to hear from the Clintons about the Epstein files. Frankly, some were more interested in just holding them in contempt than actually gleaning anything about Epstein. But it looks like the Clintons will at least sit for depositions in a few weeks. Whether there’s a hearing or not is unclear. Some Republicans may even push for that. But caveat emptor. An open session for the Clintons will only intensify the push by Democrats — and some GOPers — to hear from President Trump. 

Their testimony might not come during the Super Bowl halftime show. But open testimony by a former President and a sitting President would be a political Super Bowl.

Advertisement

politics,the clintons,jeffrey epstein,republicans,house of representatives politics,congress,william barr

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

México dice que la munición incautada a un cártel es de una fábrica del ejército de EE.UU.

Published

on


CIUDAD DE MÉXICO — Aproximadamente la mitad de los cartuchos de alto poder calibre .50 que las autoridades mexicanas han confiscado a los cárteles desde 2012 fueron rastreados hasta una fábrica de municiones en las afueras de Kansas City, Missouri, que es propiedad del gobierno de Estados Unidos, dijo el martes el secretario de Defensa de México.

La fábrica, Lake City Army Ammunition Plant, es el mayor fabricante de municiones para fusiles utilizados por el ejército estadounidense.

Advertisement

El secretario de Defensa de México, general Ricardo Trevilla Trejo, dijo que se han incautado alrededor de 137.000 cartuchos calibre .50 desde 2012.

De ellos, agregó, el 47% provenían de Lake City y se vendieron en armerías del sur de Estados Unidos.

La revelación se produjo en respuesta a la pregunta de un periodista sobre una reciente investigación conjunta de The New York Times y el Consorcio Internacional de Periodistas de Investigación que expuso cómo la munición de Lake City, que también ha sido utilizada por tiradores masivos en Estados Unidos, se ha convertido en un elemento básico para los grupos del crimen organizado en México.

Advertisement

Trevilla Trejo también afirmó que desde octubre de 2024, cuando Claudia Sheinbaum asumió la presidencia, las autoridades mexicanas habían decomisado 18,000 armas de fuego, de las cuales casi el 80% provenían de Estados Unidos.

Entre las armas más destructivas decomisadas, añadió, se encontraban rifles Barrett calibre .50, lanzagranadas, lanzacohetes y ametralladoras de diversos calibres.

El lunes, Sheinbaum dijo que su administración estaba revisando los informes del Times y el ICIJ “para que podamos hablar con el gobierno de Estados Unidos sobre este tema y entender cómo es posible que estas armas, que son para uso exclusivo del Ejército de Estados Unidos, estén ingresando a México”.

Advertisement

La investigación concluyó, de hecho, que los cartuchos calibre .50 fabricados en Lake City no estaban restringidos al ejército estadounidense.

El Ejército estadounidense ha permitido que contratistas privados que operan la planta de Lake City vendan munición a distribuidores, revendedores y tiendas minoristas, poniéndola a disposición del mercado civil.

Al menos 16 minoristas on line han vendido munición perforante fabricada en Lake City o hecha con componentes de la planta, según un recuento del ICIJ y el Times.

Advertisement

“Lo irónico es que los gobiernos de México y Estados Unidos buscan lo mismo: reducir las muertes” causadas por los cárteles, dijo Cecilia Farfán Méndez, directora del Observatorio de América del Norte de la Iniciativa Global Contra el Crimen Organizado Transnacional.

“Pero mientras los grupos criminales tengan fácil acceso a este tipo de calibres y armas, es como si estuvieran subsidiando la generación de esta violencia”.

El Ejército de EE.UU. no respondió en detalle a preguntas sobre el uso de munición de Lake City por parte de los cárteles de la droga.

Advertisement

Un portavoz declaró previamente que permitir las ventas comerciales desde la planta ahorraba a los contribuyentes decenas de millones al año.

Las balas de Lake City han terminado en manos de miembros de cárteles mexicanos, que las han utilizado para aterrorizar tanto a civiles como a fuerzas de seguridad, según documentos obtenidos por periodistas.

Armados con armas de fuego calibre .50, hombres armados del cártel han derribado helicópteros, asesinado a funcionarios del gobierno, disparado contra fuerzas policiales y militares y matado a civiles.

Advertisement

Defensas

“El blindaje que tenemos no puede proteger a nuestro personal del tipo de penetración que este cartucho es capaz de hacer”, dijo a la prensa en 2024 Luis Cresencio Sandoval, predecesor de Trevilla Trejo como secretario de Defensa de México.

Se refería a una bala calibre .50 de Lake City que se había utilizado para atacar un convoy militar en el norte de México, matando a un soldado e hiriendo a otros tres.

Advertisement

México tiene estrictas restricciones sobre quién puede comprar y poseer armas, las cuales solo se pueden adquirir legalmente en dos tiendas administradas por el ejército mexicano.

Aun así, la mayoría de los tipos y calibres están reservados exclusivamente para el ejército y las fuerzas del orden.

El gobierno mexicano estima que entre 200,000 y 500,000 armas de fuego se trafican ilegalmente a México desde Estados Unidos cada año.

Advertisement

El año pasado, la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos desestimó por unanimidad una demanda interpuesta por el gobierno mexicano contra importantes fabricantes estadounidenses, que argumentaba que las empresas habían instigado la venta ilegal de armas de fuego a los cárteles mexicanos de la droga.

En su fallo, el tribunal dictaminó que la incapacidad de los fabricantes para impedir que los minoristas independientes realizaran ventas ilegales no cumplía con los altos requisitos legales para la instigación.

Pero el tribunal reconoció la afirmación de México de que se vendían armas estadounidenses a traficantes mexicanos.

Advertisement

«No dudamos mucho de que, como afirma la denuncia, se producen algunas de estas ventas, y que los fabricantes lo saben», declaró el fallo.

México presentó una demanda por separado en Arizona contra cinco comerciantes de armas.

Reclamo

Advertisement

Sheinbaum ha pedido constantemente una mayor cooperación de la administración Trump para detener el flujo de armas y municiones de fabricación estadounidense a México, comparándolo a menudo con la presión de Washington para que su país ponga fin al tráfico de fentanilo.

Han surgido algunas iniciativas conjuntas para aumentar las inspecciones y las incautaciones en ambos lados de la frontera, así como para compartir más información entre los gobiernos.

Sin embargo, en una entrevista exclusiva el año pasado, Omar García Harfuch, secretario de Seguridad de México, declaró a la prensa del Times que los esfuerzos de Estados Unidos para reducir el suministro de armas habían sido insuficientes.

Advertisement

Si a los cárteles mexicanos les resultara más difícil “obtener ese tipo de armas”, añadió Harfuch, “definitivamente sería una lucha diferente”.

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Russian attack on Kharkiv wipes out young family, leaving pregnant mother as sole survivor

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Russian drone strike Tuesday night in Ukraine’s Kharkiv region wiped out a young family, killing a father and his three small children, leaving a pregnant mother as the sole survivor.

Advertisement

Oleg Synegubov, the governor of the Kharkiv region, said on Telegram that the attack on the town of Bohodukhiv claimed the lives of 34-year-old Grigory and his three children — 2-year-old twin boys, Ivan and Vladyslav, and their 1-year-old sister Myroslava.

The family had just evacuated from Zolochiv, a front-line town about 25 miles from the Russian border, in an effort to escape persistent shelling.

They were spending their first night in their new home when the strike occurred, Synegubov said.

Advertisement

‘ONLY TRUMP CAN STOP RUSSIA’: MILLIONS FACE FREEZING WINTER, UKRAINE ENERGY EXECUTIVE WARNS

The aftermath of a drone attack in the city of Bohodukhiv in the Kharkiv region that killed four people, including three children, in Bohodukhiv, Ukraine, on Feb. 11, 2026. (Carlo Bravo/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Olga, the children’s 35-year-old mother who is 35 weeks pregnant, survived with injuries and minor burns and was later discharged from the hospital after receiving medical care.

Advertisement

«The Russian army once again targeted an ordinary residential building in the middle of the night,» said Synegubov. «Another terrorist act of the state fighting against the civilian population – against small children, pregnant women, elderly people.»

The Kharkiv Regional Prosecutor’s Office said preliminary data indicates that a «Geran-2» drone was used in the attack.

RUSSIAN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL SHOT IN MOSCOW: REPORT

Advertisement
A person reaches out to touch a displayed Shahed-136 drone set up outdoors near a cathedral.

A resident touches a Russian-Iranian Shahed-136 (Geran-2) kamikaze drone installed in front of Saint Michael’s Cathedral as part of an exhibition displaying destroyed Russian military vehicles and weapons, in Kyiv, Ukraine, Nov. 26, 2025. (Valentyn Ogirenko/Reuters)

The Geran-2 is the Russian designation for an Iranian-designed Shahed-136, a one-way attack drone that detonates on impact and has been widely used by Moscow to strike Ukrainian cities and infrastructure.

KENYA DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM RUSSIA OVER RECRUITMENT OF CITIZENS TO FIGHT IN UKRAINE WAR

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Wednesday in a post on X that Russian forces carried out additional strikes across border and frontline regions, including launching 470 attack drones at Kherson in a single day.

Advertisement
Destroyed residential building and scattered debris fill a neighborhood following an overnight drone strike.

Damaged buildings and debris are seen after a drone attack in the city of Bohodukhiv in the Kharkiv region on Feb. 11, 2026. (Carlo Bravo/Anadolu via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«Gas supply restoration is ongoing in the Donetsk region – also following a Russian strike. There were strikes on infrastructure in the Dnipro region, in the Synelnykove district,» he wrote. «Some consumers are currently without electricity in Zaporizhzhia after ‘shahed’ strikes – restoration work is underway.»

Zelenskyy said he directed military and community leaders to develop additional measures to strengthen protection for critical infrastructure.

Advertisement



ukraine,russia,drones

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias