Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Conservative legal experts slam latest Mahmoud Khalil ruling

Published

on


A federal district judge on Wednesday said that the Trump administration’s effort to deport Mahmoud Khalil may be unconstitutional, but some conservative legal experts are not buying it.

Khalil is a pro-Palestine, anti-Israel activist who led protests at Columbia University. An immigration judge recently said he could be deported, but U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz for the District of New Jersey said that the order is likely to be dismissed as «unconstitutionally vague.» Still, Khalil will remain in custody.

Advertisement

«The district court held what we already knew: Secretary [of State Marco] Rubio’s weaponization of immigration law to punish Mahmoud and others like him is likely unconstitutional,» lawyers for Khalil said after the judge’s ruling.

FEDERAL JUDGE SAYS ATTEMPTED DEPORTATION OF ANTI-ISRAEL RINGLEADER MAHMOUD KHALIL MAY BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Anti-Israeli activist Mahmoud Khalil trashed the Trump administration’s case against him in a Washington Post column this week. (Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images | Reuters/Shannon Stapleton)

Advertisement

However, various conservative legal experts disagree with the judge.

«A judge just handed Hamas a win on American soil. Mahmoud Khalil lied his way into our country, concealed ties to a foreign regime, and then led a pro-Hamas takeover at Columbia University. Now, a judicial activist wants to block his deportation? That’s not justice — it’s national suicide. President Trump has both the constitutional authority and the moral obligation to remove threats like Khalil,» Republican attorney Mehek Cooke told Fox News Digital in a statement.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE IMMIGRATION COVERAGE

Advertisement

«The Supreme Court has made this power crystal clear. In Kleindienst v. Mandel (1972), the Court upheld the executive’s broad discretion in immigration matters. That authority was reaffirmed in Trump v. Hawaii (2018), where the Court ruled that the President has sweeping power to exclude noncitizens deemed detrimental to U.S. interests,» she continued.

ANTI-ISRAEL RINGLEADER MAHMOUD KHALIL’S FREE SPEECH LAWSUIT AGAINST US GOVERNMENT MUST BE HEARD: JUDGE

Secretary of State Marco Rubio testifies

Secretary of State Marco Rubio testifies at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on May 20. (Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)

«By declaring the Immigration and Nationality Act ‘unconstitutionally vague,’ Judge Farbiarz isn’t interpreting the law — he’s rewriting it. That violates the separation of powers and dangerously ties the hands of our Commander in Chief. Citizenship is a privilege — not a sanctuary for liars and Hamas sympathizers. I am confident this will be overturned on appeal,» Cooke added.

Advertisement

Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, said it is a «ridiculous, meritless claim by a rogue federal judge,» and said that even though Kahlil is a legal resident of the U.S., he can still face consequences.

«Aliens have no constitutional right to be in the U.S. Moreover, under federal immigration law, 8 U.S.C. 1227, aliens like Khalil, including permanent resident aliens, can be removed if the alien ‘endorses or espouses terrorist activity’ or support ‘a terrorist organization.’ Khalil’s blatant support for Hamas, a designated terrorist organization, makes him immediately deportable. This is another biased, partisan judge refusing to abide by federal immigration law and interfering in the president’s constitutional and statutory authority,» he told Fox News Digital in a statement.

LAWYERS FOR COLUMBIA ANTI-ISRAEL ACTIVIST MAHMOUD KHALIL BLAST RUBIO EVIDENCE LETTER: ‘TWO PAGES, THAT’S IT’

Advertisement
Supporters of pro-Hamas Mahmoud Khalil protest outside Federal court

People gather for a protest in support of Mahmoud Khalil in front of a federal courthouse in Newark, New Jersey, on March 28. (Stephanie Keith for Fox News Digital)

The White House also condemned the ruling, continuing its frequent clashes with federal judges over immigration policy.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«Mahmoud Khalil was given the privilege of coming to America to study, but he squandered that opportunity by siding with Hamas terrorists and organizing protests that disrupted college classes and harassed Jewish-American students. Secretary of State Rubio has the right to revoke green cards or visas for any individuals who are adversarial to United States foreign policy and national security interests,» Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, said in a statement.

Advertisement

Fox News’ Anders Hagstrom and Sarah Rumpf-Whitten contributed to this report.

Immigration,Israel,US protests

INTERNACIONAL

En su mensaje de Pascua, el Papa pidió que «los que tienen el poder de desencadenar guerras elijan la paz»

Published

on



El Papa celebró su primera Pascua este domingo en una plaza San Pedro bulliciosa por el entusiasmo de 50 mil fieles y turistas. Una Pascua ensombrecida por la guerra a cuyos responsables pidió «elijan la paz» en su mensaje Urbi et Orbi (a Roma y el mundo).

En la conclusión de la primera Semana Santa de su pontificado, León XIV presidió la más importante celebración del calendario cristiano en un clima de inquietud por la guerra en Medio Oriente.

Advertisement

Anoche, Sábado Santo, los temores de un agravamiento del panorama bélico también resonaron en la basílica de San Pedro. El pontífice llamó esta mañana a la esperanza ante la violencia e la guerra “que mata y destruye” y la “idolatría del lucro” que saquea los recursos de la tierra” en su mensaje durante la misa de Resurrección.

En la homilía, León advirtió que “la muerte siempre asecha” y se manifiesta en los “egoísmos partidistas”, la opresión de los pobres y la “escasa atención” a los más frágiles.

“La vemos en la violencia, en las heridas del mundo, en el grito de dolor que se eleva por todas partes a causa de los abusos que aplastan a los más débiles”. Frente a ello subrayó que la Pascua es “una fuerza imparable”, capaz de dar luz en la oscuridad más profunda.

Advertisement

“Hoy necesitamos este canto de esperanza», afirmó, pidiendo a los creyentes a que “lleven la alegría de la resurrección por las calles del mundo”.

Pero el mensaje pascual “no siempre es fácil de acoger”, especialmente cuando “el lastre de los pecados” o la soledad agotan la esperanza”, señaló.

Señaló que el anuncio pascual alcanza al ser humano “hasta los abismos de la muerte” y “abre a la esperanza que no desfallece, a la luz que no se apaga, a esa plena de alegría que nada puede borrar”.

Advertisement

“Cuando las preocupaciones o los resentimientos sofocan la alegría de vivir, cuando sentimos tristeza y cansancio, cuando nos sentimos traicionados o rechazados, no parece que hayamos caído en un túnel del que no vemos la salida”, admitió.

Del altar frente a la basílica partió un bellísimo despliegue de decoraciones florados con decenas de miles de flores aportadas por los floristas holandeses.

Terminada la misa, el Papa se trasladó al balcón central de la basílica, donde el 8 de mayo pasado apareció ante la multitud y se anunció el Habemus Papam desde el cual el pontífice envió su bendición Urbi et Orbi, a Roma y al Mundo.

Advertisement

León XIV evitó, como es habitual en los mensajes dominicales tras el ángelus del mediodía, de pasar revista a los conflictos bélicos que se difunden en el mundo.

Anunció que el sábado 11 de este mes habrá una celebración en la basílica de San Pedro para implorar a Dios por la paz.

Lanzó mensajes en varios idiomas, como es costumbre en la jornada de Pascua y llamó al mundo a “elegir la paz”.

Advertisement

Denunció la “indiferencia” ante la guerras en el mundo, que dejan miles de muertos.

“Nos estamos habituando a la violencia , nos resignamos a ella y nos volvemos indiferentes ante la muerte de miles de miles de personas, indiferentes ante las secuelas de odio y división que siembran los conflictos y a sus consecuencias económicas y sociales”, señaló.

León XIV hizo un llamado a deponer las armas y buscar la paz en los conflictos globales mediante el diálogo. Enfatizó el mensaje de esperanza de la Pascua como una celebración de la resurrección de Jesús tras ser crucificado.

Advertisement

“¡Dejemos que nuestros corazones sean transformados por el amor de Cristo por nosotros!”. “Que quienes tienen armas las depongan!”. “¡Que quienes tienen el poder de desatar guerras elijan la paz!” “¡No una paz impuesta por la fuerza sino mediante el diálogo!” “¡No con el deseo de dominar a los demás sino de encontrarnos!”, imploró el pontífice.

El Papa mencionó una sensación de indiferencia “ante la muerte de miles de personas” y ante las consecuencias económicas y sociales que producen”-

Sin mencionar las guerras en particular, León citó a su predecesor, el Papa argentino Francisco, que durante su última aparición pública desde el mismo balcón principal de la Basílica, el día antes de su muerte, recordó a los fieles la “gran sed de muere, de matar, que presenciamos cada día».

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Surging UK Green Party pushes church-state split, critics warn of break from Britain’s Christian roots

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

LONDON: The left-wing British Green Party has said it wants to separate the Church of England from the state if it wins the next general election, which must be held before August 2029.

Advertisement

The Church of England has been the «established» church since the 16th-century Reformation, with the British monarch serving as its supreme governor. For traditionalists, this link is not merely ceremonial but is the foundational bedrock of British identity.

The Greens have come under fire for seeking to remove centuries of British history and tradition by separating the church from British politics, with critics characterizing it as the latest move against Christianity in the U.K.

GB News reported last month that the Green Party policy document stated: «No person shall hold office in the state, or be excluded from any such office, by virtue of their or their spouse’s membership or non-membership of any religion or denomination of religion.»

Advertisement

UK FLAG CLASH AS FOREIGN BANNERS FLY, CITIZENS PUSH BACK AGAINST WOKE POLICIES RESHAPING BRITAIN

King Charles ascended the throne in September 2022 following his mother’s death, and his coronation was in May 2023. (Richard Pohle – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

Michael McManus, the director of research at the Henry Jackson Society, a U.K. think tank, told Fox News Digital, «Britain is a tolerant society but with clear Christian origins and culture. Aiming to disestablish the Church of England could be seen as an attempt to reject that ethical foundation without being clear what would replace it instead.»

Advertisement

High-profile figures have also weighed in on the debate, with actor and comedian John Cleese responding to a comment about the Greens’ proposal by stating on X: «The UK has always been based at the deepest level on Christian values, regardless of dogma. Despite the many mistakes made by churches, for centuries British people have been influenced by Christ’s teaching. If these values are replaced by Islamic ones, this will not be Britain anymore.»

FORMER UK PM DEFENDS TRUMP FOR HIGHLIGHTING ‘SHARIA LAW’ IN BRITAIN DURING UN SPEECH

The Greens are a growing political force, placing second behind Reform UK in a recent YouGov poll. Another YouGov poll linked the Greens’ rise in popularity with younger voters in the country, finding a majority of those between 18 and 24 supported them, while also doing well with women and other groups.

Advertisement
UK Green Party leader Zack Polanski.

UK Green Party leader Zack Polanski. (Finnbarr Webster/Getty Images)

A spokesperson for the Green Party told Fox News Digital, «We will be setting out our detailed plans for government at the time of the next General Election, just as we did at the last General Election. As always, our members will be shaping our priorities. These will again address the real and immediate needs of people and the planet, such as tackling the climate crisis, bringing down the cost of living and rebuilding our public services, including the NHS. Our focus is on the issues that impact ordinary people most.»

CHURCHILL, SHAKESPEARE AND THE UK FLAG ALL UNDER SIEGE IN MODERN BRITAIN, COMMENTATORS SAY

Green Party leader Zack Polanski has defended a secular state. He has also drawn criticism for his support of legalizing drugs such as heroin and cocaine, his climate policies and anti-Israel positioning.

Advertisement
Christmas morning Eucharist service at Canterbury Cathedral with clergy and congregation

A view of Christmas morning Eucharist service at Canterbury Cathedral, Canterbury, United Kingdom, on Dec. 25, 2022. (Stuart Brock/Anadolu Agency)

The timing of the Green Party’s push is particularly sensitive as it comes on the heels of the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026, which passed last month, removing the last hereditary aristocrats from Parliament. With the hereditary principle gone, the presence of the «Lords Spiritual» has become the next logical target for constitutional reformers. There are currently 26 seats reserved for Church of England archbishops and bishops in the House of Lords.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

As the U.K. heads toward a local 2026 election cycle, the «Church and State» debate looks set to become a wedge issue. For the Greens, it represents their commitment to a «diverse and inclusive» Britain. For their detractors, it is a dangerous move that risks «de-Christianizing» the country at a moment of profound social uncertainty.

Advertisement

Whether the proposal will mobilize a new «religious vote» or simply fade behind the urgency of other issues remains to be seen. What is clear, commentators say, is that the image of the established Church is increasingly being viewed through the lens of a much sharper and more polarized political fight.



united kingdom, elections, green, religion, uk politics, christianity religion, family personal freedoms

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Federal judge blocks Trump push to collect race-based admissions data

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump’s effort to investigate race-based admissions at U.S. colleges was temporarily blocked Friday by a federal judge in Boston.

Advertisement

U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV granted a preliminary injunction Friday, temporarily barring the Trump administration from forcing public colleges in 17 Democrat-led states to submit detailed admissions data meant to prove they are not unconstitutional considering race.

Saylor did admit the federal government likely can seek such information in «identifying potential problems» and «patterns of discrimination» but the executive order’s 120-day deadline was «rushed and chaotic» and «epitomizes arbitrary and capricious agency action.»

Trump, while moving to shut down the Department of Education to return its functions to the states last March, sought a four-month deadline for race data on college admissions this past August.

Advertisement

TRUMP ADMIN PROBE ACCUSES HARVARD OF DISCRIMINATING AGAINST JEWISH STUDENTS, THREATENS TO PULL ALL FUNDING

Education Secretary Linda McMahon (Getty Images)

«Within 120 days of the date of this memorandum, and to be initiated this 2025-2026 school year, the Secretary of Education, in coordination with NCES [National Center for Education Statistics], shall expand the scope of required reporting to provide adequate transparency into admissions, as determined by the Secretary of Education, consistent with applicable law,» Trump’s executive order challenged by Democrats read. 

Advertisement

A coalition of 17 Democratic state attorneys general sued, arguing the new reporting regime would invade student privacy, burden universities and trigger unwarranted federal investigations.

«Plaintiffs have established, based on the record before the Court, that they are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the agency action was ‘arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and not otherwise in accordance with the law,’» Saylor concluded. «Furthermore, and notwithstanding the contention of the government, plaintiffs have established that immediate irreparable harm will result if the injunction does not issue. And they have likewise established that the balance of equities and the public interest favor preliminary injunctive relief. Accordingly, the motion for a preliminary injunction will be granted.»

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY VIOLATED TILE VI WITH ‘UNLAWFUL DEI POLICIES,’ EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SAYS

Advertisement

The administration argued the data collection is needed to ensure colleges are complying with the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision ending affirmative action in admissions, while still allowing applicants to discuss how race affected their lives in essays.

«Race-based admissions practices are not only unfair, but also threaten our national security and well-being,» Trump’s order read. «It is therefore the policy of my Administration to ensure institutions of higher education receiving Federal financial assistance are transparent in their admissions practices.»

TRUMP DOJ PROBES MICHIGAN SCHOOLS OVER GENDER CURRICULUM, JOINS LAWSUIT AGAINST LA RACE-BASED PROGRAM

Advertisement

Under the policy, colleges were told to provide admissions data broken down by race and sex and to report it retroactively for seven years, with possible penalties for schools that failed to comply.

The administration’s policy echoes settlement agreements the government negotiated with Brown University and Columbia University, restoring their federal research money. The universities agreed to give the government data on the race, grade-point average and standardized test scores of applicants, admitted students and enrolled students. The schools also agreed to be audited by the government and to release admissions statistics to the public.

The NECS is to collect the new data, including the race and sex of colleges’ applicants, admitted students and enrolled students. Education Secretary Linda McMahon has said the data, which was originally due by March 18, must be disaggregated by race and sex and retroactively reported for the past seven years.

Advertisement

TRUMP’S DEMAND FOR COLLEGES NATIONWIDE TO FORK OVER RACE DATA FACES LEGAL HURDLE

President Donald Trump speaking with Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the White House Roosevelt Room

President Donald Trump speaks with Secretary of Education Linda McMahon during an executive order signing ceremony in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on July 31, 2025. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

If colleges fail to submit timely, complete and accurate data, the administration has said McMahon can take action under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, which outlines requirements for colleges receiving federal financial aid for students.

The Trump administration separately has sued Harvard University over similar data, saying it refused to provide admissions records the Justice Department demanded to ensure the school stopped using affirmative action.

Advertisement

Harvard has said the university has been responding to the government’s requests and is in compliance with the Supreme Court ruling against affirmative action. On Monday, the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights directed Harvard to comply with the data requests within 20 days or face referral to the U.S. Justice Department.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Saylor’s injunction applies only to public institutions in the 17 Democratic plaintiff states, at least for now.

Advertisement

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

dept of education, federal judges, education, justice department

Continue Reading

Tendencias