Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Energy groups celebrate Trump’s latest move to unleash Alaska drilling

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Conservative energy leaders are celebrating President Donald Trump’s latest effort to unleash American drilling. 

Advertisement

The Department of the Interior announced a proposal Monday to rescind President Joe Biden’s restrictions on oil and gas development in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. 

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said a Biden-era 2024 Bureau of Land Management (BLM) rule that restricted energy development for more than half of the 23 million acres on Alaska’s North Slope ignored the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976. 

«The National Petroleum Reserve (NPR), created by Congress over a century ago to secure America’s energy supply, supports responsible oil development on 13 million acres,» Frank Lasee, president of Truth in Energy and Climate, said in a statement shared with Fox News Digital. 

Advertisement

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO OPEN 13 MILLION ALASKA ACRES TO MINING, DRILLING

Unleashing American energy was one of President Donald Trump’s key campaign promises on the 2024 presidential campaign trail.  (Getty Images/AP)

«President Biden’s drilling ban in Alaska undermined energy security, increasing reliance on foreign oil, raising gasoline prices and fueling inflation through higher transportation costs,» Lasee added. «Resuming drilling puts economic growth and energy independence ahead of climate ideology in a place almost no regular American will ever visit.»

Advertisement

TRUMP ENERGY DEPARTMENT CANCELS $3.7 BILLION IN BIDEN-ERA GREEN ENERGY GRANTS 

Consistent with Trump’s executive orders, the proposed revision reverts to regulations that were in place prior to May 7, 2024, which Lasee called a «commendable» prioritization of «American energy needs and economic well-being while adhering to the law.»

«President Biden never should have halted congressionally sanctioned oil drilling in Alaska,» said Sterling Burnett, director of the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy at the Heartland Institute. «Trump is to be applauded, both for putting Americans’ energy needs and our economic well-being first and for following the law by opening these areas back up for production.»

Advertisement

According to the Department of Interior, the 2024 rule provisions lacked «a basis in the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act» and undermined the BLM’s congressional obligation to oversee timely leasing in the region. 

Alaska pipeline

A part of the Trans Alaska Pipeline Sept. 17, 2019, in Fairbanks, Alaska.  (Getty Images)

«President Trump’s move to restore drilling in Alaska’s Arctic region is a bold and necessary step toward reclaiming American energy independence,» Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, said. 

Trump vowed to unleash American energy on the campaign trail in 2024 and signed executive orders on the first day of his second term to rescind Biden-era climate policies. 

Advertisement

«By reversing Biden’s disastrous restrictions on 13 million acres, Trump is unleashing the abundant resources that power our economy, lower energy costs and strengthen national security. This is a victory for American workers, consumers and allies who rely on stable, affordable energy,» Isaac added. 

Steve Milloy, senior policy fellow at the Energy & Environment Legal Institute, called the announcement «more good news from the Trump administration in rolling back more of Biden’s war on fossil fuels.»

Joe Biden speaks at event

President Joe Biden’s administration added regulations to 13 million acres on Alaska’s North Slope.  (Bonnie Cash/UPI/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

«Promises made. Promises kept. But the Trump administration will need to go further to give investors confidence that the Alaska leases will actually be viable. Radical climate activists will resort to the courts and scare off investors. There likely needs to be a legislative solution to that,» Milloy added.

Advertisement

Trump and his Republican allies are seeking to roll back some of Biden’s green energy initiatives through budget reconciliation on Trump’s «big, beautiful bill.»

«The National Petroleum Reserve (NPR) was created more than 100 years ago specifically to provide a supply of oil for America’s energy security. That energy security can be achieved by responsibly developing our oil reserves, including in the Gulf of America, our vast shale oil deposits in America’s heartland and, now, thankfully, the 13 million acres of the NPR that are going to be developed,» said Gregory Whitestone, CO2 Coalition executive director.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«Continuation of the Biden administration’s drilling ban would have resulted in a greater reliance on foreign supplies of oil (and) increases in gasoline prices and the inflationary spiral across all sectors of the American economy from increased transportation costs,» Whitestone added. 

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Portland set to see Trump crime crackdown reckoning after 2020’s humiliating violence spree

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Portland, Oregon, is on track to face a Trump crime crackdown reckoning that’s more than five years in the making.

Advertisement

Portland was ravaged by violence in 2020 as liberal protesters, Black Lives Matter activists, Antifa anarchists and others converged on the deep blue stronghold following the death of George Floyd during an interaction with Minneapolis police on Memorial Day of that year. 

The Trump administration deployed federal law enforcement to help quell the violence near federal property, but did not roll out crime crackdown initiatives on par with what the president is currently unveiling in cities such as Washington, D.C., this year. 

Now, President Donald Trump has set his sights on the left-wing city to remove illegal immigrants and crack down on crime trends — five years after the city saw millions of dollars in damages and witnessed consecutive nights of rioting that began on Memorial Day and continued into September 2020. 

Advertisement

TRUMP VOWS ‘FULL FORCE’ AS HE PLANS TO SEND TROOPS TO PORTLAND AMID ANTI-ICE PROTESTS

Police deploy tear gas and munitions to disperse protesters during a demonstration in Portland, Ore., Sept. 5, 2020. (AP)

«At the request of Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, I am directing Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, to provide all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland, and any of our ICE Facilities under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists,» Trump posted to Truth Social on Saturday morning.

Advertisement

«I am also authorizing Full Force, if necessary. Thank you for your attention to this matter!» he added.

George Floyd’s death on Memorial Day in 2020 sparked nationwide protests and riots, but in Portland, unrest raged for more than 100 consecutive nights, with the city recording a staggering 144% increase in homicides between 2019 and 2021, and millions of dollars in damages to businesses and government buildings. 

Trump was in office during the riots and protests of 2020, as his administration juggled the coronavirus pandemic — including state lockdowns and vaccine requirements for some workers — while Trump faced Joe Biden and the Democratic Party at the ballot box.

Advertisement

Trump railed against the violence that played out in The City of Roses, while the Department of Homeland Security launched the Protecting American Communities Task Force to protect federal monuments, memorials, and other buildings from violence and vandalism in the city and other crime-rattled cities like it. 

OREGON SUES OVER TRUMP ADMIN’S ‘WAR-RAVAGED PORTLAND’ NATIONAL GUARD TROOP DEPLOYMENT

The task force was formed after rioters broke into the Multnomah County Justice Center at the end of May, igniting a fire inside and spray-painting the building. The justice center houses Portland police headquarters and a county jail, and sits next to the Mark O. Hatfield U.S. Courthouse.

Advertisement

The federal courthouse faced repeated vandalism, including rioters launching fireworks at the building, graffiting the exterior with anti-police slogans, and breaking its windows. The task force worked to protect the Hatfield building, as well as a handful of other federal buildings, from attacks, Fox News Digital previously reported. 

photo shows protesters in Portland, Oregon during the riots of 2020

Demonstrators shield from tear gas fired by federal officers during a protest at the Mark O. Hatfield U.S. Courthouse in Portland, Ore., July 24, 2020. (Marcio Jose Sanchez/AP Photo)

«These are anarchists. These are not protesters. People say protesters. These people are anarchists. These are people that hate our country. And we’re not going to let it go forward,» Trump said in July 2020, while claiming that violence-plagued cities needed «more federal law enforcement» and celebrating that the law enforcement deployed to Portland had «done a fantastic job.»

Trump railed against local Democratic leaders at the time for failing to end the violence when it first began, including slamming then-Mayor Ted Wheeler as «incompetent» and a «fool,» as well as messages against then-Gov. Kate Brown, while underscoring that federal law enforcement would clean the city up. 

Advertisement

OREGON COUNTY LOST $1 BILLION IN 2020 AS RESIDENTS FLED CRIME, HOMELESSNESS: ‘IT’S LIKE PORTLAND DIED’

Portland rioters face federal and local authorities

Federal officers fire crowd control munitions at protesters outside the Mark O. Hatfield U.S. Courthouse in Portland, Ore., July 21, 2020. (AP Photo/Noah Berger)

Federal law enforcement officials on the task force, however, were phased out of the city that summer, with local police replacing federal officers who worked to protect federal buildings beginning at the end of July.

Critics accused Trump of abusing power by deploying federal authorities to Portland. A coalition of Democratic mayors — including leaders from Washington, D.C., Portland and Chicago — urged Congress to block further deployments, arguing it threatened the First Amendment.

Advertisement

PORTLAND RIOTS CAUSED AT LEAST $2.3M IN DAMAGE TO FEDERAL BUILDINGS IN CITY, STATE’S US ATTORNEY SAYS

Protests and riots continued in the city in the fall months of 2020 — when the final leg of the federal election dominated headlines – and after federal officials left the city. Federal law enforcement officials had been phased out of the city by Aug. 31, according to a DHS Inspector General report published in 2021. 

Trump speaks to reporters at the White House

President Donald Trump speaks to reporters before departing the White House, Sept. 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

All told, the riots caused an estimated $2.3 million in damages to federal buildings in Portland alone, Fox News Digital previously reported, while Portland police reported spending at least $6.2 million to cover overtime and personnel costs for just roughly one month of the riots, and businesses in the downtown area lost tens of millions of dollars in revenue and damages due to the protests and riots, the police chief said at the time. 

Advertisement

In the fallout, the police department’s staffing woes worsened as the city defunded its force and morale cratered; homicides hit an all-time high in November 2022 – recording 101 homicides that year – and shootings increased across the city, with Portland recording more than 1,000 shootings across the first 10 months of 2021. 

AT LEAST 16 CITIES SEE RECORD HOMICIDES IN 2021

Trump has been on a crime crackdown blitz since his second inauguration, as agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security launched massive deportation efforts to remove the millions of illegal immigrants who flooded the nation under the Biden era, and Trump turned his attention to individual cities he believes are in need of assistance on law and order. 

Advertisement

Trump federalized the Washington, D.C., police department on Aug. 11 and deployed the National Guard to patrol the city. Trump has celebrated the federalization of Washington, D.C.’s police force as a success, including notching zero homicides across a 13-day period in August, and arresting more than 2,000 suspects for crime stretching from illegal firearms charges to immigration arrests. He has also lauded Democratic D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser for her assistance with the effort. 

National Guard troops in DC

National Guard troops patrol Washington, D.C., after Trump ordered their deployment in August 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

«We don’t have a crime problem in Washington anymore,» Trump told reporters earlier in September of the crackdown. «And the mayor has been very helpful.» 

Two hundred National Guard members are expected to converge on Portland in the coming days. The campaign follows Chicago’s ongoing «Midway Blitz» crime crackdown to weed out illegal immigrants in the Windy City, and as Memphis, Tennessee, prepares to receive its own teams of federal law enforcement and National Guard members later this week to combat crime in the southern city. 

Advertisement

Portland has seen ongoing issues with crime, including rampant drug use and homelessness, and has seen flaring protests over the summer — most notable near a Portland ICE facility — as the Trump administration carried out various immigration crackdowns across the country. 

Anti-ICE graffiti was scrawled on the outside of the Portland ICE facility, while the demonstrations have become violent at times between protesters and federal agents, prompting authorities to use rubber bullets, tear gas and flash bangs to break up the crowds, Fox Digital reported earlier this month. 

In August, protesters displayed a guillotine and fought with police before officers fired munitions to disperse the crowd.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Oregon sued the Trump administration on Sunday in an attempt to prevent the deployment of 200 National Guard members to Portland. The National Guard members began arriving to the city over the weekend, Fox Digital previously reported. 

Local leaders have slammed Trump’s order as «unlawful,» while arguing the city poses no threat to national security. 

Advertisement

«Our city is a far cry from the war-ravaged community he has posted on social media,» Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek told reporters at a news conference on Sunday. Kotek added that she spoke directly with Trump.

«There is no insurrection, there is no threat to national security and there is no need for military troops in our major city,» she added.

Fox News Digital’s Cameron Arcand, Michael Dorgan and Michael Ruiz contributed to this report. 

Advertisement

portland,antifa,crime,donald trump,politics,oregon

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Emmanuel Macron sale al auxilio de los chefs de Francia: la gente ya no sale a comer y cierran decenas de restaurantes por mes

Published

on


El bistró, ese típico restaurante francés, está en vías de extinción. Cada día, 25 restaurantes cierran en Francia en medio de una crisis que afecta a sus dueños, a sus empleados y al nuevo paladar francés pos-COVID.

Cansados de facturas consideradas demasiado altas y, a veces, de una calidad decepcionante, los consumidores franceses están abandonando los restaurantes tradicionales. La comida rápida, la entrega a domicilio (delivery), la charcutería o la comida para llevar (take-away): estas alternativas se están convirtiendo en parte de su vida diaria. El confinamiento por el COVID y la incorporación del delivery, que no existía en Francia hasta entonces, está cambiando los hábitos de los consumidores.

Advertisement

En un día otoñal tan soleado de septiembre, los turistas inundan las calles de París. Aún bronceados por las vacaciones de verano, los ejecutivos cruzan la calle apurados y miran sus celulares permanentemente. Es mediodía, pero nadie se detiene en la brasserie del barrio de Saint-Germain, que ofrece en su pizarra negra el plato del día: “mero a la vasca”, un pescado del Mediterráneo. Solo hay cinco mesas ocupadas y son turistas.

El dueño, con delantal negro y una sonrisa cansada, camina por su salón casi vacío: «Antes, a esta hora, solíamos rechazar a la gente. Hoy, luchamos por llenarlo«, comenta.

Tradicionalmente, los franceses tienen una hora y media para almorzar en sus trabajos y las brasseries tienen sus menús preparados para ellos: entrada, plato principal y postre, rápidamente servidos. Pero los bistrós son una desolación al mediodía.

Advertisement

El poder de compra en crisis

No es de extrañar que los restaurantes en Francia estén vacíos. El poder adquisitivo en Francia está en crisis, con un país altamente endeudado, salarios bajos e inflación. Francia se ha vuelto muy cara, especialmente a la hora de comprar alimentos, gasolina y ropa para las familias.

El poder adquisitivo corresponde a la cantidad de bienes y servicios que se pueden adquirir con un ingreso. Por lo tanto, depende del nivel de ingresos y del nivel de precios. La variación del poder adquisitivo corresponde a la diferencia entre las variaciones de los ingresos del hogar y las variaciones de los precios. Si el aumento de los ingresos es mayor que el de los precios, el poder adquisitivo aumenta. En caso contrario, disminuye.

Advertisement
El poder adquisitivo en Francia está en crisis, con un país altamente endeudado, salarios bajos e inflación. Foto EFE

Ese “pouvoir d’achat” es lo que está forzando a los franceses a cambiar sus hábitos culinarios y sus tradiciones en la cocina. El dinero no les alcanza a las familias.

Americanización y comidas rápidas

Los franceses prefieren abandonar el restaurante y comer en casa, o inclinarse por la comida rápida.

Advertisement

Mientras los bistrós de los barrios desaparecen, en París nacen otra clase de restaurantes muy americanizados que sirven hamburguesas, hot dogs, milkshakes, jugos, helados, lattes, café exlarge y leche. Un menú demasiado alejado del tradicional gusto francés, pero consumido por los 60 millones de turistas anuales que recibe Francia. Le Marais está inundado de ellos. Trabajan para otro público: los extranjeros de visita.

«Dentro de quince años, solo habrá restaurantes de gama baja y de alta gama inaccesibles para los turistas», advierte Alain Fontaine.

Julie, que trabaja en una boutique de Le Marais, lo admite: «No queremos pagar tanto para irnos decepcionados. Prefiero pedir una ensalada en la boutique».

Advertisement

La inflación, el teletrabajo, los cambios en los hábitos alimenticios y el auge de la comida rápida: los males de esta clientela en declive son bien conocidos. Pero a esto se suma la creciente desconfianza de los consumidores, que denuncian una brecha entre los precios, cada vez más altos, y una experiencia culinaria que no siempre cumple con sus expectativas.

«Ya no queremos pagar por lo que podríamos tener en casa», afirma Chloé, de 47 años. Esta parisina ha dejado de ir a restaurantes para comer «platos caros, malos, a veces incluso procesados».

Jean, un cliente habitual más selectivo, va «solo a sitios que conozco bien. Muchos restaurantes de gama media mezclan productos procesados. No los culpo. Pero el precio tiene que estar acorde con este tipo de cocina», explica.

Advertisement

Esta revuelta fue especialmente fuerte este verano, sobre todo en redes sociales. Muchos restaurantes, incluso en lugares turísticos, vieron sus terrazas vacías.

Otros denunciaron una tendencia generalizada: «¿En qué momento ofreces un postre por 8 euros, una Coca-Cola por 4 y una comida para microondas por 25? Es la elección natural. Los dueños de restaurantes han forzado demasiado los límites, y el consumidor ha votado: ahora pagan por comida normal, pero más barata, en otros lugares», explica una clienta.

"¿En qué momento ofreces un postre por 8 euros, una Coca-Cola por 4 y una comida para microondas por 25?", se pregunta una clienta. Foto The New York Times«¿En qué momento ofreces un postre por 8 euros, una Coca-Cola por 4 y una comida para microondas por 25?», se pregunta una clienta. Foto The New York Times

Más allá de la comida en sí, muchos creen que los dueños de restaurantes están cobrando muy por encima del precio justo. «Realmente siento que están tomando a los clientes por tontos. Solo hay que fijarse en el vino», dijo uno de ellos.

“Una botella por la que un restaurador podría pagar 10 euros acabará siendo de 3 a 6 veces más cara en su menú», lamenta Thibaut, de 34 años.

Advertisement

«A veces pagamos casi 20 euros por un plato tibio, servido por un personal poco amable. Después de un tiempo, no quieres pagar tanto para irte decepcionado. Ahora, prefiero pedir. Con la entrega a domicilio, tengo acceso a una amplia gama; elijo lo que quiero comer”, anunció Sophie.

Macron al rescate

El presidente Emmanuel Macron salió hoy al rescate de los restaurantes y sus tradiciones.

Advertisement

Un centenar de profesionales se reunieron en el Palacio del Elíseo junto al presidente y Brigitte, la primera dama. Entre ellos, los chefs Armand Arnal, Cyril Attrazic, Claude Barbet, Virginie Basselot y Jérôme Bocuse.

Macron ofreció un almuerzo el lunes con los chefs, dueños de restaurantes emblemáticos y representantes de la industria para debatir cómo afrontar los retos del sector, garantizando al mismo tiempo la excelencia del saber hacer francés, según anunció el Palacio del Elíseo.

Carniceros, charcuteros, viticultores y ganaderos también estuvieron presentes en la mesa del presidente, al igual que un pastelero y un trufero. Los debates se centraron en los diversos problemas que enfrenta el sector —escasez de mano de obra, viabilidad económica y atractivo— en un «contexto económico complejo», según indicó el Palacio del Elíseo. La promoción de la calidad, la educación sobre alimentación saludable y la «diplomacia gastronómica, una herramienta para atraer el turismo a Francia y las exportaciones», estuvieron en el orden del día.

Advertisement

«Debemos eliminar todos los impuestos y tasas sobre las propinas», que «deben ir íntegramente a los bolsillos de quienes trabajan», declaró el Jefe de Estado durante la reunión.

«Los tiempos son difíciles» para la industria, señaló el presidente, quien reúne a la profesión cada año, señalando el «aumento de los costos», la «dificultad para la contratación» y la disminución de la afluencia de clientes.

«Existe un problema de poder adquisitivo, lo que significa que en muchos lugares, los restaurantes, que son una tradición, se abren con menos frecuencia», señaló el presidente.

Advertisement

La exención de las contribuciones a la seguridad social y de los impuestos sobre las propinas pagadas con tarjeta de crédito finalizará el 31 de diciembre de 2025, para gran consternación del sector.

Francia aún cuenta con 175.000 restaurantes, un récord en Europa.Francia aún cuenta con 175.000 restaurantes, un récord en Europa.

El Jefe de Estado también pretende promover el título de «maître restaurateur», que garantiza un trabajo basado en productos crudos y frescos para la mayoría, lamentando que solo haya 3.000 y pidiendo un objetivo de 10.000 para 2027.

Debemos «distinguir mejor, en términos de simplificaciones, impuestos y beneficios sociales, entre quienes cocinan y quienes recalientan», señaló. En cuanto a las importaciones, «no supervisamos suficientemente el cumplimiento de nuestras normas en puertos y aeropuertos», señaló. Se refería a «los alimentos que llegan del otro lado del mundo y no cumplen las condiciones sanitarias y fitosanitarias que imponemos a nuestros propios productos».

El Jefe de Estado también instó a una «transformación cultural» entre los franceses. «Hemos acostumbrado a nuestros compatriotas a que la comida no cuesta nada o cada vez menos. Debe haber algo para todos los bolsillos». Detrás del trabajo realizado, también debe haber «un precio justo», argumentó.

Advertisement

«Estamos asistiendo a una americanización de las comidas: comida rápida, sandwicherías y cadenas de restaurantes», señaló Alain Fontaine, presidente de la Asociación Francesa de Maestros Restauradores.

Cierran 25 restaurantes por día

La crisis de los restaurantes en Francia es real. Cada día, 25 establecimientos cierran, o casi 9.000 al año, según los tribunales comerciales. Y, sin embargo, el país aún cuenta con 175.000 restaurantes, un récord en Europa. Esta paradoja lo dice todo: el problema no es solo la falta de clientes, sino la saturación de un mercado debilitado por el exceso de aperturas y la falta de profesionalidad.

Advertisement

En veinte años, el número de restaurantes se ha duplicado. Al no estar protegida la denominación, abrir un establecimiento se ha vuelto accesible para cualquiera con local y financiación. Como resultado, Francia tiene un número desproporcionado de restaurantes en comparación con el poder adquisitivo real de su población. En París, hay más de tres restaurantes por cada 1.000 habitantes, una de las tasas más altas del mundo.

Muchas aperturas están dirigidas por aficionados, apasionados, pero sin una sólida formación en gestión, recursos humanos o cocina. Para sobrevivir, estos establecimientos recortan donde es más fácil: menús industriales, condiciones laborales degradadas y salarios bajos. El resultado: una imagen devaluada y equipos que no se quedan.

Hace veinte años, nadie hablaba de «falta de personal». Los equipos estaban más calificados, las plazas se cubrían y, a pesar de las condiciones a veces duras, la profesión era atractiva. ¿Por qué? Porque había menos restaurantes, más estabilidad y más experiencia.

Advertisement

Hoy en día, todo se paga con tarjeta de crédito, las cotizaciones a la seguridad social son esenciales y cada euro debe justificarse. Todo es más transparente. A esto se suma la explosión de los costos de las materias primas, que crea una brecha insostenible entre el precio real de un plato y el poder adquisitivo de los clientes.

Finalmente, la tecnología digital lo ha cambiado todo: hace veinte años, no existían las redes sociales, las plataformas de empleo ni los sitios web. Los dueños de restaurantes captaban y retenían clientes sin quejas públicas. Hoy los castigan o los premian en las redes sociales.

Los aficionados dañan la cocina

Advertisement

Mientras que los bistrós independientes están agotados, las cadenas de comida rápida prosperan. McDonald’s, Burger King y KFC por sí solos representan más de 2.500 establecimientos en Francia, con un crecimiento de dos dígitos. McDonald’s Francia genera más de 6.000 millones de euros en ingresos, más que todo el sector de los restaurantes tradicional en varias regiones juntas. ¿Su receta? Precios bajos, logística fluida, una marca sólida.

Abrir un restaurante ya no puede dejarse solo en manos de aficionados. Exigir un diploma para abrir un establecimiento garantizaría un nivel mínimo de habilidades en gestión, higiene y administración. Al mismo tiempo, una etiqueta exigente para los establecimientos gastronómicos reforzaría la credibilidad de quienes defienden la calidad y la transmisión del saber hacer. La gastronomía francesa necesita garantías para seguir siendo un referente mundial.

Los buenos empleadores están experimentando dificultades de contratación porque los malos empleadores han dañado la imagen y las condiciones laborales de la profesión. Son los profesionales serios quienes pagan los errores de los aficionados.

Advertisement

La realidad es dura: la afluencia de clientes está disminuyendo. Pagar 15 euros por dos tomates y una bola de mozzarella se ha convertido en algo habitual e insostenible para muchos hogares. Mientras persista esta brecha entre precio y poder adquisitivo, el sector de la restauración estará bajo presión. La única respuesta es la calidad y un precio adecuado.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

NHS removes controversial report on ‘benefits’ of first-cousin marriage after fierce public backlash in UK

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) has come under fire for potentially prioritizing cultural sensitivity over significant health concerns after it published a report last week questioning a major issue of public debate — should first-cousin marriages be banned?

Advertisement

Debate over the issue heightened earlier this year after U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he would not ban the practice outright, despite known risks to future generations, as children born from first cousins are at increased risk for diseases like sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis.

Starmer, along with members of his Labour government, has argued that education should be prioritized instead of overreaching government mandates.

BRITISH PM CRITICIZED FOR BLOCKING BILL BANNING FIRST-COUSIN MARRIAGE AMID MOUNTING HEALTH CONCERNS

Advertisement

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer unveils Labour’s plan for the NHS during a visit to the Sir Ludwig Guttman Health & Wellbeing Centre on July 3, 2025, in London. (Jack Hill – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

The article, which was posted to the NHS’s Genomics Education Program’s website and titled, «Should the UK government ban first-cousin marriage,» had been removed by Monday morning, and Fox News Digital could not gain direct access to the report, nor did the NHS immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s questions. 

According to U.K.-based media outlets, the article caused some uproar after it suggested there were certain «benefits» to first-cousin marriages, including «stronger extended family support systems and economic advantages,» the Telegraph reported. 

Advertisement

The NHS report also noted that inter-family marriages have «long been the subject of scientific discussion» due to the increased risk of inherited diseases, and that first-cousin marriages have been legal in the U.K. since the 1500s, when King Henry VIII married Catherine Howard, his ex-wife’s cousin.

First cousin marriages are also not federally banned in the U.S., where the practice is still permitted in 20 states.

ELON MUSK WADES BACK INTO UK POLITICS, BACKS LEADER OF NEW RIGHT-WING PARTY, MOCKS RIVAL

Advertisement
NHS Neonatal unit

St. John Ambulance neonatal intensive care ambulances lined up at charging units outside the Royal London Hospital on May 25, 2023, in London. (Mike Kemp/In Pictures via Getty Images)

The article also noted that there are risks of genetic disorders related to other external factors like alcohol use during pregnancy and smoking. The age of the parents can also impact certain disorders. 

The report pointed out that «none of [these factors] are banned in the U.K.»

«Genetic counseling, awareness-raising initiatives and public health campaigns are all important tools to help families make informed decisions without stigmatizing certain communities and cultural traditions,» the article added, according to the Telegraph.

Advertisement

The article, first posted last week, drew rebuke from conservative Tories like Member of Parliament Richard Holden, who accused the Labour government, headed by Starmer, of «taking the knee to damaging and oppressive cultural practices.»

«The Conservatives want to see an end to cousin marriage as a backdoor to immigration too, but Labour are deaf to these sensible demands,» he told the Daily Mail.

Similarly, Conservative Member of Parliament Claire Coutinho took to X on Monday to say, «The NHS puts conditions on IVF by age, BMI and history of conception. The NHS tells you (a lot) not to smoke or drink during pregnancy. But the NHS won’t say a word against cousin marriage.»

Advertisement

The Daily Mail report also noted that the NHS article said in first-cousin marriages the increased risk of being born with a genetic condition was «small.»

«In the general population, a child’s chance of being born with a genetic condition is around two to three percent; this increases to four to six percent in children of first cousins. Hence, most children of first cousins are healthy,» the article said, according to the Daily Mail.

Richard Holden outside No. 10

Conservative Party Chairman Richard Holden leaves Downing Street after the weekly cabinet meeting on March 12, 2024, in London. (Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Wes Streeting, who oversees the NHS, did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s questions for this report.

Proponents of the ban in the U.K. tend to be conservative Tories, while Labor officials have argued the ban insensitively targets certain cultures, like British Pakistanis, where in-family marriages are more common. 

Starmer’s cabinet office directed Fox News Digital’s questions to the Department of Health and Social Care, who did not immediately provide comment for this report. 

Advertisement

Holden also could not be immediately reached for this report. 



united kingdom,health,health care senate,world,europe

Continue Reading

Tendencias