Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Minnesota faces federal lawsuit for offering illegal immigrants college tuition benefits denied to Americans

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint challenging laws in Minnesota that provide free and reduced in-state tuition to illegal aliens, claiming the laws are unconstitutional.

Advertisement

Under federal law, higher education institutions are prohibited from providing benefits to illegal aliens not offered to U.S. citizens.

According to the DOJ, Minnesota’s laws unconstitutionally discriminate against U.S. citizens and are in direct conflict with federal law.

«No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens,» Attorney General Pam Bondi said. «The Department of Justice just won on this exact issue in Texas, and we look forward to taking this fight to Minnesota in order to protect the rights of American citizens first.»

Advertisement

DISCOUNTED COLLEGE TUITION FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS POLICY LEADS DOJ TO SUE KENTUCKY

Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice are suing the state of Minnesota for allowing illegal immigrants to get free or reduced in-state tuition, which is not afforded to all U.S. citizens. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

By filing the lawsuit, the DOJ is demanding that Minnesota stop the enforcement of a law requiring public colleges and universities to provide in-state tuition rates and free tuition based on certain income circumstances to immigrants in the country illegally who maintain state residency.

Advertisement

Federal law prohibits higher education facilities from providing education benefits to illegal immigrants, which are not offered to U.S. citizens.

The lawsuit comes just weeks after the DOJ took actions against Texas for providing similar benefits to illegal immigrants.

DOJ SUES TEXAS FOR OFFERING IN-STATE COLLEGE TUITION TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS IN ALLEGED VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW

Advertisement
Minnesota Capitol

The sun shines on the Minnesota State Capitol on Monday, Feb. 12, 2024, in St. Paul, on the opening day of the 2024 session of the Minnesota Legislature. Lawmakers have a relatively modest agenda ahead after a momentous 2023 session that saw Democrats use their newfound full control of the statehouse to enact an ambitious list of their priorities. (AP Photo/Steve Karnowski)

Both lawsuits have been filed in response to two executive orders signed by President Donald Trump since returning to the Oval Office in January.

The executive orders were signed to ensure illegal immigrants cannot receive taxpayer benefits or preferential treatment.

One of the orders, «Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders,» ordered all agencies to «ensure, to the maximum extent permitted by law, that no taxpayer-funded benefits go to unqualified aliens.»

Advertisement

The other order, «Protecting American Communities From Criminal Aliens,» directs officials to «take appropriate action to stop the enforcement of State and local laws, regulations, policies, and practices favoring aliens over any groups of American citizens that are unlawful, preempted by Federal law, or otherwise unenforceable, including State laws that provide in-State higher education tuition to aliens but not to out-of-State American citizens.»

TRUMP ADMIN SUES COLORADO, DENVER OVER ‘SANCTUARY LAWS,’ ALLEGED INTERFERENCE IN IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT

Ultimately, Texas complied with the DOJ and stopped enforcing the Texas Dream Act, which was originally introduced in February 2001.

Advertisement

The legislation, signed by Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, June 16, 2001, removed federal immigration status as a factor in determining eligibility to pay in-state tuition at Texas public colleges and universities for students who graduate from a Texas high school and who meet the minimum residency, academic and registration criteria.

While the state immediately stopped enforcement, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has since intervened.

On Tuesday, the ACLU of Texas, alongside organizations like the Texas Civil Rights Project and Democracy Forward, filed a motion to intervene in the litigation to defend the constitutionality of the Texas Dream Act against the DOJ.

Advertisement

The ACLU said the DOJ’s order was agreed to by Texas without proper process and creates «sweeping uncertainty» for students and colleges.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«As students prepare to attend school in the fall, the failure of neither the DOJ nor the attorney general to defend the Texas Dream Act threatens their ability to afford tuition – and suddenly threatens their dreams of pursuing higher education,» the ACLU said in a press release. «By moving to intervene, these groups and individuals hope to challenge this abusive litigation strategy and defend the Texas Dream Act, which has enabled a generation of Texans to grow their careers and become leaders in our communities.»

Advertisement

Fox News Digital has reached out to Gov. Greg Abbott’s office for comment on the matter.

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Supreme Court says Trump can proceed with firing Democrat-appointed CPSC members

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Supreme Court on Wednesday said President Donald Trump could proceed with the firing of three Democratic members of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) who were fired and then reinstated to their roles on the board — the latest high-stakes court clash centered on Trump’s authority as authority to remove or otherwise control the fate of independent agency.

Advertisement

The majority sided with the Trump administration in a 6-3 vote on the emergency order, the last of the Supreme Court’s current term. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court in early July to stay the decision of a lower court judge in Maryland who sided with the three ousted board members, Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr. U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox, a Biden appointee, ruled that their firings were unlawful and ordered they be reinstated to their roles.

The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals declined to grant the Trump administration’s request to stay the order, clearing the way for the administration to appeal the matter to the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

APPEALS COURT BLOCKS TRUMP FROM FIRING FEDERAL BOARD MEMBERS, TEES UP SUPREME COURT FIGHT

Supreme Court justices attend the 60th inaugural ceremony for President Trump on Jan. 20, 2025, at the U.S. Capitol. The event was held indoors due to weather. (Ricky Carioti /The Washington Post via Getty Images)

In its emergency filing to the Supreme Court, U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer pointed to the court’s decision in another, factually similar emergency case reviewed by the high court earlier this year, in which justices agreed to temporarily block the reinstatements of board members for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB).

Advertisement

Sauer pointed to the factual similarities underpinning both cases, and argued that the high court’s emergency decision there «squarely controls this case.»

The CPSC board members disputed that notion in their own Supreme Court filing — arguing that their removals from the CPSC would «disrupt the status quo» from an agency dedicated to consumer protection and safety.

They also pointed to the timing of their removals, noting that the Trump administration made no attempt to oust them for four months — a delay they argue shows no urgency and undercuts any claim of «irreparable harm,» a key standard for emergency court action.

Advertisement

BIDEN-APPOINTED JUDGE THWARTS TRUMP’S ATTEMPT TO CLEAN HOUSE AT CONSUMER SAFETY AGENCY

CPSC board members Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric, and Richard Trumka Jr. are seen in this three-way split image. Photos via AP News/Getty Images

CPSC board members Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric, and Richard Trumka Jr. are seen in this three-way split image. Photos via AP News/Getty Images (AP/Getty)

After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit rejected the government’s request to temporarily freeze Maddox’s order, the government appealed it to the Supreme Court.

In his ruling, Maddox said that the tenured design and protection of the five-member, staggered-term CPSC board does «not interfere with» Trump’s executive branch powers under Article II of the U.S. Constitution.

Advertisement

The case is the latest in a string of challenges centered on Trump’s ability to remove members of independent boards. Like the NLRB and MSPB rulings, it centers on the 90-year-old Supreme Court decision known as Humphrey’s Executor, in which the court unanimously ruled that presidents cannot fire independent board members without cause.

Supreme Court exterior during daytime

The Supreme Court ruled Trump can fire CPSC board members on July 23, 2025.  (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Maddox invoked the uncertainty created by the preliminary posture of the NLRB and MSPB cases, which saw both plaintiffs removed and reinstated to their positions multiple times — which he said was the basis for ordering more permanent injunctive relief.

Advertisement

«Disruption might have resulted in the instant case if Plaintiffs had been reinstated while this case was in its preliminary posture, only to have the Court later deny relief in its final judgment and subject Plaintiffs to removal again,» said Maddox. «The risk of such disruption is no longer a factor now that the Court is granting permanent injunctive relief as a final judgment.» 

In his ruling, Maddox said that the tenured design and protection of the five-member, staggered-term CPSC board does «not interfere with» Trump’s executive branch powers under Article II of the U.S. Constitution.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

News agency says its Gaza journalists suffering health woes as union warns they will die without intervention

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Agence France-Presse news agency said its freelance journalists in Gaza are suffering constant health issues while a union is warning they will die «without immediate intervention.» 

Advertisement

The news agency works with one freelance reporter, three photographers and six freelance video journalists in the Gaza Strip since its own staff fled the war-torn territory in 2024, according to The Society of Journalists at AFP union. 

«They’re spending so much time and energy trying to source food and also just they just feel so weak,» Phil Chetwynd, AFP’s global news director, told NPR. «They talk about constant headaches, constant dizziness. So just the ability physically to, you know, get to a story is diminished.» 

«Without immediate intervention, the last reporters in Gaza will die,» the union said in its own statement. «With a few others, they are now the only ones reporting what is happening in Gaza. The international press has been banned from entering this territory for nearly two years.» 

Advertisement

AMERICAN VETERANS ATTACKED, INJURED WHILE DISTRIBUTING AID IN GAZA WITH US-BACKED GROUP 

An airstrike hits a building in the Al-Nasr neighborhood in Gaza City, Gaza on July 21, 2025.  (Saeed M. M. T. Jaras/Anadolu via Getty Images)

«Since AFP was founded in August 1944, we have lost journalists in conflicts, we have had wounded and prisoners in our ranks, but none of us can recall seeing a colleague die of hunger. We refuse to see them die,» it added in a post on X. 

Advertisement

The union said its lead photographer in Gaza, which it identified as Bashar, wrote on Facebook Saturday that «I no longer have the strength to work for the media. My body is thin and I can no longer work.» 

«Bashar, 30, works and lives under the same conditions as all Gazans, moving from one refugee camp to another amid Israeli bombings. For over a year, he has lived in absolute poverty and takes enormous risks to do his job. Hygiene is a major issue for him, with recurring bouts of severe intestinal illness,» The Society of Journalists at AFP said. 

«Since February, Bashar has been living in the ruins of his house in Gaza City with his mother, four brothers and sisters, and the family of one of his brothers. Their house is completely without amenities or comfort, shared with a few cousins. On Sunday morning, he reported that one of his brothers had ‘fallen, due to hunger,’» it added. 

Advertisement

DOZENS OF PALESTINIANS KILLED, NEARLY 200 WOUNDED WHILE ON THEIR WAY TO COLLECT AID IN GAZA 

Palestinians line up to receive meal in Gaza

Palestinians shove to receive a hot meal at a charity kitchen in the Mawasi area of Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip on July 22, 2025. (AFP via Getty Images)

The union said each of its freelance journalists in Gaza are receiving a monthly salary from the AFP, however, «there’s almost nothing to buy — or what is available is prohibitively expensive.» 

Representatives for the AP and Reuters also expressed concern for their teams there, but would not say how many people are working for them. 

Advertisement

«We are deeply concerned about our staff in Gaza and are doing everything in our power to support them,» said Lauren Easton, a spokeswoman for The Associated Press. «We are very proud of the work our team continues to do under dire circumstances to keep the world informed about what is happening on the ground.» 

Reuters said that it is in daily contact with its freelance journalists, and that «the extreme difficulty sourcing food is leading to their and all Gaza residents experiencing greater levels of hunger and illness.» 

Demonstration in Gaza City

A demonstrator holds a sign reading in Arabic «a hungry journalist writes a report about the hungry» during a protest by journalists against hunger in the Rimal district of Gaza City on July 19, 2025.  (Omar Al-Qattaa/AFP via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Advertisement

The agency said it is providing extra money to help them. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Advertisement


Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Una candidata en Chile propone triplicar la producción de salmones

Published

on


Presidential candidate Evelyn Matthei gives a speech during the official launch of her presidential campaign in Santiago, Chile June 4, 2025. REUTERS/Pablo Sanhueza

La candidata Evelyn Matthei adelantó que si resulta ganadora en las próximas elecciones presidenciales en Chile impulsará un proyecto público-privado para que el país multiplique por tres su producción salmonera alcanzando los 3 millones de toneladas y una facturación de unos USD 20.000 millones anuales.

Matthei, histórica figura política de la derecha pero que últimamente se ha acercado al centro del electorado, según las miradas políticas más recientes, participó esta semana del “Salmón Summit 2025”, el principal evento de la industria realizado en el suntuoso Teatro del Lago de Frutillar, Región de los Lagos.

Advertisement

También fueron de la partida la ex ministra del Trabajo y militante comunista, Jeannette Jara, y el otro candidato de la derecha, José Antonio Kast. Los tres esbozaron sus visiones y planes para el segundo sector exportador de Chile después del cobre. Las elecciones presidencial serán a fin de año.

La industria salmonera es el cobre de las regiones australes”, señaló Matthei. “Genera 4.000 pymes, 86.000 empleos, descentralización real, más de 6.400 millones de dólares en exportaciones”, dijo y apuntó al bajo crecimiento promedio del sector en la última década estancado en un 1%. “Concesiones que esperan más de 10 años de relocalización, proyectos que han enfrentado 27 años de tramitación, si se suman todos, sobreposición de normas, duplicidad de trámites, instituciones que no se comunican entre sí, indiferencia total de las autoridades”, criticó.

Matthei dejó sobre la mesa un modelo similar al Noruego para triplicar la producción durante su mandato, si llega a triunfar en las elecciones. Noruega es el mayor productor mundial de salmón con 1.2 millones de toneladas y USD 11.500 millones en exportaciones, de acuerdo a datos de mercado.

Advertisement
FOTO DE ARCHIVO-La alcaldesa de
FOTO DE ARCHIVO-La alcaldesa de Providencia, Evelyn Matthei, se reúne con simpatizantes en un acto en Viña del Mar, Chile. 9 de agosto de 2024. REUTERS/Rodrigo Garrido

En base a estos números Chile superaría a Noruega aunque hay informaciones de mercado que indican que el país del norte tiene un plan bastante parecido para su propio sector.

La tónica de los candidatos en este encuentro, clave para que los políticos se expresen sobre una industria que no recibió el apoyo del actual presidente Gabriel Boric, fue positiva y despojada de advertencias o amenazas contra su existencia.

Parte de la clase política más desarrollista y del empresariado chileno, aspiran a acercarse a números de exportación del primer mundo. Países como Noruega e Irlanda exportan por USD 220.000 millones. En caso de triplicar sus exportaciones de salmón, Chile, en base a números actuales, superaría los USD 113.000 millones. En 2024 el país rompió su récord histórico con exportaciones por USD 100.163 millones. Todavía lejos de un monstruo como Brasil que exporta por USD 337.000 millones. De hecho, Chile exportó en 2024, 146.597 toneladas de salmón a ese país por USD 915 millones.

El sector representa unos 86.000 empleos directos e indirectos y alrededor de USD 6500 millones en exportaciones. Solo en Magallanes (frente a Tierra del Fuego, Argentina) entrega 7.000 puestos de trabajo, se producen alrededor de 180.000 mil toneladas y exportan por USD 650 millones.

Advertisement

El gobierno de Boric faltó a la cita en una posición que parece más ideológica que economicista. El presidente de SalmónChile, Arturo Clément, advirtió en el cierre del evento que no acudió ninguno de los funcionarios invitados por la organización. “Hace más de un mes y medio invitamos a varios ministros, subsecretarios, sin embargo, nuevamente, nadie llegó. Así es difícil dialogar y avanzar”, explicó.

Poco después de su arribo al poder, el mandatario advirtió que la salmonicultura debería abandonar las áreas de reserva, generando preocupación en toda la industria. La declaración probablemente sorprendió a los propios empresarios por las consecuencias que tendría una decisión de tal naturaleza. En la parte final de su mandato Boric no pudo avanzar en este propósito, pero en los últimos tres años la industria ha soportado ataques de diverso orden por parte de funcionarios del gobierno y de ONGs extranjeras que no ocultan que tienen sus planes hiper conservacionistas para el sur de Chile.

Alrededor de 1.500 personas acudieron al Teatro del Lago en Frutillar, una imponente construcción que fue levanta con un presupuesto de USD 20 millones donados por la familia Shiess.

Allí estuvieron presentes Jeannette Jara, José Antonio Kast y Evelyn Matthei para entregar su visión, entre otras cosas, de la industria del salmón.

Advertisement

La industria salmonera es el cobre de las regiones australes”, indicó Evelyn Matthei. La candidata planteó la posibilidad de triplicar la producción mediante un plan público-privado inspirado justamente en Noruega. También se comprometió a declarar el 26 de mayo como el “Día del Trabajador Salmonero”, un pedido que meses atrás la Multisindical de los Trabajadores le había solicitado al ministro de economía Nicolás Grau.

Matthei aprovechó para pasar factura a Jara. “El actual gobierno trató de destruir la industria del salmón (…) Yo no escuché a la ministra del Trabajo protestando por la destrucción de sus empleos. Por eso, vamos a declarar el 26 de mayo el Día del Trabajador Salmonero”, aportó.

La exalcaldesa pidió modificar la polémica ley Lafkenche. Esta ley le permite a descendientes de pueblos aborígenes reclamar grandes extensiones de territorio marítimo para su administración. Un recurso alentado por el gobierno que el empresariado entendió como otra traba para su desarrollo. En 2023 y 2024 se debatió en los Consejos Regionales de Aysén y Magallanes la entrega de más 600 mil hectáreas a reducidos grupos de descendientes que la exigían para sí, pero las solicitudes terminaron siendo rechazadas.

Advertisement

Para cultivar salmones se ocupan solo 4.120 hectáreas de mar, con la ley Lafkenche se están pidiendo 3 millones 900 mil hectáreas, es decir, los salmones ocupan el uno por mil de lo que se está pidiendo, y mientras tanto, todo parado. Ahí hay un abuso flagrante que no se puede seguir permitiendo, hay que modificar la ley Lafkenche”, subrayó Matthei.

Jose Antonio Kast, former Chilean
Jose Antonio Kast, former Chilean Presidential candidate, speaks during the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Mexico City, Mexico August 24, 2024. REUTERS/Toya Sarno Jordan

“Chile necesita volver a ser competitivo en la industria del salmón”, señaló por su parte José Antonio Kast. El candidato apuntó contra la burocracia y adelantó que impulsará una “desregulación sustantiva, reducción de impuestos y menor gasto político”, sintetizó SalmónChile en sus redes. Tampoco lo olvidó “la sustentabilidad ambiental en equilibrio con la viabilidad económica del sector, y llamó a enfrentar las trabas institucionales que frenan el desarrollo del rubro”, recordó la organización.

Jeannette Jara se distanció de ciertos sectores del gobierno de Boric y de las visiones ofrecidas por las ONGs más radicales y mencionó “un nuevo pacto para la salmonicultura”.

“Chile tiene un gran potencial de construir, fortalecer su economía azul, dada la enorme costa que tenemos. Y sin duda, la industria del salmón como segunda industria exportadora de nuestro país todavía tiene mucho espacio para crecer”, señaló.

Advertisement

“La candidata propuso descentralizar la toma de decisiones, simplificar permisos sin bajar estándares ambientales y fomentar la innovación real. Reafirmó su enfoque en el diálogo social como eje de gobernanza, buscando que el crecimiento llegue a todos los sectores, desde grandes empresas hasta las pymes y las familias chilenas”, consignó SalmónChile en referencia a Jara.

En la apertura de las jornadas del Salmón Summit, Arturo Clément, presidente de SalmonChile, ya había resaltado el papel clave que juega el sector en la economía nacional. “Como sector productivo, nuestra principal preocupación es el estancamiento económico del país y cómo la salmonicultura puede ser parte clave de la solución”, señaló Clément.

“Necesitamos un marco normativo claro y estable que incentive la innovación y el desarrollo local. Finalmente, buscamos que los candidatos conozcan el carácter estratégico de la salmonicultura, no solo para el sur y su aporte a Chile, sino también como pilar de la seguridad alimentaria global”, agregó.

Advertisement



South America / Central America,Government / Politics,SANTIAGO

Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias