Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

ACLU sues Trump over birthright order as Supreme Court clears path for it to take effect

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Hours after the Supreme Court delivered the Trump administration a major victory Friday by ruling lower courts may issue nationwide injunctions only in limited instances, a coalition of liberal legal groups filed a sweeping new class-action lawsuit in New Hampshire federal court. It takes aim at President Donald Trump’s January executive order that redefines who qualifies for U.S. citizenship at birth.

Advertisement

While the justices’ 6-3 ruling leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case, Friday’s lawsuit accuses the administration of violating the Constitution by denying citizenship to children born on U.S. soil if their mothers are either unlawfully present or temporarily in the country and their fathers are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.

The case was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of New Hampshire, ACLU of Maine, ACLU of Massachusetts, Legal Defense Fund, Asian Law Caucus and Democracy Defenders Fund. It seeks to represent a proposed class of children born under the terms of the executive order and their parents.

UPENDING US BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP WOULD HAVE DRASTIC NEGATIVE IMPACT, DEFENDERS WARN

Advertisement

President Donald Trump answers questions during a news conference on recent Supreme Court rulings Friday in the briefing room at the White House. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

It is not the first legal challenge to the policy. The same group filed a separate suit in January 2025 in the same court on behalf of advocacy organizations with members expecting children who would be denied citizenship under the order. That case led to a ruling protecting members of those groups and is now pending before the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, with oral arguments scheduled for Aug. 1.

Friday’s SCOTUS ruling states that lower courts can no longer block federal policies nationwide unless it’s absolutely necessary to give full relief to the people suing. The decision does not say whether Trump’s birthright citizenship order is legal, but it means the order could take effect in parts of the country while legal challenges continue. The court gave lower courts 30 days to review their existing rulings.

Advertisement

«The applications do not raise — and thus we do not address — the question whether the Executive Order violates the Citizenship Clause or Nationality Act,» Justice Amy Coney Barrett said, writing for the majority. «The issue before us is one of remedy: whether, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, federal courts have equitable authority to issue universal injunctions.»

«A universal injunction can be justified only as an exercise of equitable authority, yet Congress has granted federal courts no such power,» she added.

SUPREME COURT TAKES ON BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP: LIBERALS BALK AT TRUMP ARGUMENT TO END NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS

Advertisement
Trump speaks at press briefing

President Donald Trump, joined by Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, addresses recent Supreme Court rulings with members of the press in the briefing room at the White House Friday in Washington, D.C. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in her dissent, suggested plaintiffs could pursue class actions as an alternative.

«Nevertheless, the parents of children covered by the Citizenship Order would be well advised to file promptly class action suits and to request temporary injunctive relief for the putative class pending class certification,» Sotomayor wrote. «For suits challenging policies as blatantly unlawful and harmful as the Citizenship Order, moreover, lower courts would be wise to act swiftly on such requests for relief and to adjudicate the cases as quickly as they can so as to enable this Court’s prompt review.»

The ACLU lawsuit calls birthright citizenship «America’s most fundamental promise» and claims the executive order threatens to create «a permanent, multigenerational subclass» of children denied legal recognition.

Advertisement

«The Supreme Court’s decision did not remotely suggest otherwise, and we are fighting to make sure President Trump cannot trample on the citizenship rights of a single child,» said Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and lead attorney in the case.

Journalists outside Supreme Court

Members of the media stand in front of the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., on the final day of this term on Friday. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

«This executive order directly opposes our Constitution, values, and history,» added Devon Chaffee, executive director of the ACLU of New Hampshire. «No politician can ever decide who among those born in our country is worthy of citizenship.»

The lawsuit cites the 14th Amendment, which provides that «all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.» It also references the Supreme Court’s 1898 decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which affirmed birthright citizenship for U.S.-born children of noncitizens.

Advertisement

The plaintiffs include individuals from Honduras, Taiwan and Brazil. One mother in New Hampshire is expecting her fourth child and fears the baby will be denied citizenship despite being born in the U.S.

The case is Barbara et al. v. Trump et al., No. 1:25-cv-244, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire.

«Trump’s executive order directly opposes our Constitution, values, and history and it would create a permanent, multigenerational subclass of people born in the U.S. but who are denied full rights,» said SangYeob Kim of the ACLU of New Hampshire in January.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«Today’s historic decision delivers a decisive rejection of the weaponized lawfare President Trump has endured from leftist activist judges who attempted to deny the president his constitutional authority,» White House spokesperson Liz Huston wrote to Fox News Digital. 

«President Trump will continue to implement his America First agenda, and the Trump Administration looks forward to litigating the merits of the birthright citizenship issue to ensure we secure our borders and Make America Safe Again.»

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report.

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

University of Virginia president resigns amid pressure from Trump admin over DEI initiatives

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The University of Virginia president stepped down on Friday after facing intense pressure from the Trump administration over the institution’s diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

Advertisement

James E. Ryan, who had led the school since 2018, said he had already decided that next year would be his last and decided not to «fight the federal government in order to save my own job» until then.

To make a long story short, I am inclined to fight for what I believe in, and I believe deeply in this University,» Ryan wrote to the UVA community on Friday. «But I cannot make a unilateral decision to fight the federal government in order to save my own job. To do so would not only be quixotic but appear selfish and self-centered to the hundreds of employees who would lose their jobs, the researchers who would lose their funding, and the hundreds of students who could lose financial aid or have their visas withheld.»

«This is especially true because I had decided that next year would be my last, for reasons entirely separate from this episode—including the fact that we concluded our capital campaign and have implemented nearly all of the major initiatives in our strategic plan,» he continued.

Advertisement

TRUMP’S DOJ PRESSURING UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA TO AXE ITS PRESIDENT OVER DEI PROGRAMS: REPORT

University of Virginia President James E. Ryan stepped down after facing intense pressure from the Trump administration. (Getty Images)

Robert D. Hardie, leader of the University of Virginia’s governing board, said in a statement he accepted Ryan’s resignation with «profound sadness,» adding that he had been an «extraordinary president,» led the institution to «unprecedented heights» and that the university «has forever been changed for the better as a result of Jim’s exceptional leadership.»

Advertisement

This comes after the Trump administration had privately demanded that the university remove Ryan to help resolve a Justice Department probe into the institution’s DEI practices, according to The New York Times.

The Justice Department argued that Ryan had failed to dismantle the school’s DEI programs and misrepresented the steps taken to eliminate them, amid the administration’s efforts to root out DEI in higher education, the newspaper reported.

The federal government’s moves targeting higher education include pulling billions of dollars from elite universities such as Harvard, which has been the subject of investigations by various agencies over issues such as DEI initiatives, admissions practices and alleged antisemitism on campus.

Advertisement

But this was the first time the administration had pressured a university to remove its president.

«That sham virtue signaling of DEI has no place in our country, and the Trump administration is working tirelessly to erase this divisive, backward, and unjust practice from our society,» White House spokesman Harrison Fields told Fox News Digital.

«Any university president willingly breaking federal civil rights laws will be met with the full force of the federal government, and it would behoove every school in America to prioritize the civil rights of every student and end DEI once and for all,» he continued.

Advertisement
James Ryan

James Ryan, who had led the school since 2018, said he had already decided that next year would be his last. (AP)

Ryan had focused on increasing diversity at the university, bringing in more first-generation students and encouraging community service. These efforts had ruffled the feathers of conservative alumni and Republican board members who argued he was «too woke» and wanted to impose his beliefs on students.

Before his time as the university’s president, Ryan served as the dean of the Harvard Graduate School of Education, where he received recognition for his commitment to DEI programs.

In a joint statement, Virginia’s Democratic senators said it was «outrageous» that the administration would demand Ryan’s resignation over «‘culture war’ traps.»

Advertisement

«Decisions about UVA’s leadership belong solely to its Board of Visitors, in keeping with Virginia’s well-established and respected system of higher education governance,» Sens. Mark Warner and Tim Kaine said. «This is a mistake that hurts Virginia’s future.»

Conservative groups have lambasted Ryan for what they regard as insufficient steps toward compliance with the administration’s plans to eliminate DEI. America First Legal, a nonprofit launched by Trump advisor Stephen Miller, accused the University of Virginia last month of rebranding DEI programs to skirt Trump’s executive orders aimed at ending diversity initiatives.

HARVARD KENNEDY SCHOOL ANNOUNCES LAYOFFS AFTER TRUMP CUTS BILLIONS IN FUNDING

Advertisement
Justice Department

The Trump administration had privately demanded that the university remove Ryan to help resolve a Justice Department probe into the institution’s DEI practices. (Ting Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«Rebranding discrimination does not make it legal, and changing a label doesn’t change the substance,» Megan Redshaw, an attorney at America First Legal, said in a statement at the time. «UVA’s use of sanitized language and recycled job titles is a deliberate attempt to sidestep the law.»

The group took direct aim at Ryan, noting that he joined hundreds of other college presidents in signing a public statement condemning the administration’s «overreach and political interference.»

Advertisement

On Friday, the group vowed to continue to use every available tool to root out DEI.

«This week’s developments make clear: public universities that accept federal funds do not have a license to violate the Constitution,» Redshaw said in a statement to The Associated Press. «They do not get to impose ideological loyalty tests, enforce race and sex-based preferences, or defy lawful executive authority.»

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

US Virtual Embassy in Iran urges Americans to evacuate country immediately after partial airspace reopening

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The U.S. Virtual Embassy in Iran is insisting that Americans leave the Middle Eastern country amid conflicts in the region after a partial reopening of its airspace.

Advertisement

This comes after a ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel to end the nearly two-week conflict.

«As of June 26, 2025, Iran’s airspace has been partially reopened, although business trips from Tehran and other major centers may be interrupted,» the embassy said in an advisory. «US citizens should follow local media and consult with commercial airlines to get more information about flights departing from Iran.»

American citizens who wish to leave Iran must travel by land to Azerbaijan, Armenia, Turkey or Turkmenistan if the conditions are safe, the embassy said.

Advertisement

IRAN WARNS OF ‘REAL CAPABILITIES’ IF TRUMP DOESN’T DROP ‘DISRESPECTFUL’ TONE TOWARD SUPREME LEADER

The U.S. Virtual Embassy in Iran is encouraging Americans to leave the Middle Eastern country following a partial reopening of its airspace. (AP Photo)

The U.S. State Department created a crisis information acceptance form for American citizens in Iran to provide information on consular assistance, the embassy noted. But because of the limitations of consular support in Iran, the embassy said it does not anticipate that withdrawal from Iran will be provided with direct assistance from the U.S. government.

Advertisement

U.S. citizens who plan to leave Iran must use the available facilities to leave the country, it said.

The embassy encouraged Americans wanting to leave Iran to take several actions, including having a plan to leave immediately without relying on the U.S. government, keeping their phones charged and communicating with loved ones about their situation, preparing an emergency plan for emergency situations and signing up for alerts from the U.S. government such as the Intelligent Passenger Registration Program (STEP) that would make it easier to find their location in an emergency abroad.

NEW YORK TIMES ATTORNEY TELLS TRUMP NO APOLOGY COMING FOR COVERAGE OF IRAN STRIKES

Advertisement
An apartment building that was damaged following bombings across Tehran, Iran carried out by Israel.

American citizens who wish to leave Iran must travel by land to Azerbaijan, Armenia, Turkey or Turkmenistan if the conditions are safe, the embassy said. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

Americans who cannot leave Iran are advised to find a safe place in their residence or another safe building and to carry food, water, medicine and other essential items with them.

At certain intervals, the Iranian government has limited access to the mobile internet network and physical phone lines, the embassy said, adding that U.S. citizens should be prepared for internet network outages and develop alternative network connectivity and communication plans.

«American-Iranian dual citizens must leave Iran with an Iranian passport and before leaving Iran, they must be ready to face checkpoints and be interrogated by Iranian authorities,» the embassy said. «The state of the Iranian government Dual citizenship does not recognize and will treat American-Iranian dual citizens only as Iranian citizens. US nationals in Iran are at significant risk of interrogation, arrest, and detention. Showing a US passport or proving a connection with the United States is sufficient reason for the arrest of a person by the Iranian authorities.»

Advertisement
Aftermath of Israeli attack on Iran

Americans who cannot leave Iran are advised to find a safe place in their residence or another safe building. (AP:Getty)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«US passports may be confiscated in Iran,» it continued. «American-Iranian dual citizens should consider that in their Iranian passport, they will receive the necessary visas for the countries they will pass through on their return trip to the United States, so that in case of confiscation of their American passport, they can use [their] Iranian passport in Iran. These people can then apply for a new US passport in the country they will pass through.»

U.S. citizens who reside in Iran with a permanent residence visa, regardless of how long they are staying, must obtain an exit permit when departing Iran, the embassy said, noting that all Iranian passport holders are required to pay exit fees.

Advertisement


Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

La guerra olvidada de África: un conflicto que lleva dos años, decenas de miles de muertos y 12 millones de desplazados

Published

on


La guerra civil de Sudán está fuera del radar mediático. Un misil disparado en Medio Oriente genera más repercusión que el drama humanitario que viven casi 25 millones de personas, la mitad de la población de este país africano arrasado por un conflicto que lleva más de dos años.

Sudán es un territorio pobre e inestable, de escaso valor estratégico y con una sociedad poco desarrollada. No es noticia en los grandes centros del poder geopolítico internacional y ni siquiera en las naciones periféricas como la Argentina. Simplemente, el drama de millones de personas abandonadas a su suerte no genera suficiente empatía o solidaridad en el mundo.

Advertisement

Leé también: Cómo es el hermético poder nuclear de Israel: un secreto no reconocido y tolerado por las potencias mundiales

Por un lado, combaten las Fuerzas de Apoyo Rápido (FAR, paramilitares) y, por el otro, las Fuerzas Armadas Sudanesas (FAS), lideradas por antiguos aliados y hoy enemigos acérrimos enfrentados por el poder de un lugar olvidado por todos.

Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, líder de las FAR, lucha contra su antiguo jefe, el comandante del ejército regular, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, líder de facto del país desde el golpe de Estado de 2021. Ambos bandos son acusados por igual de asesinatos en masa, violencia sexual sistemática, secuestros, saqueo de ayuda y destrucción de infraestructura y del sistema de salud que depende de la ayuda exterior.

Advertisement

El país está dividido en dos. El norte, este y centro está controlado por el Ejército, que debió trasladar la sede de su autodenominado “Gobierno de la Esperanza” a Port Sudán, sobre el Mar Rojo, para escapar de los combates en Jartum, la capital. En tanto, la vasta región occidental de Darfur está en manos de los paramilitares. Pero amplias zonas del sur están en constante disputa.

El mapa de Sudán, con las ciudades y regiones clave en la guerra que lleva dos años. (Foto: VideoLab /TN)

¿Más de 150.000 muertos?

Las cifras estremecen. Desde el estallido de la guerra, el 15 de abril de 2023, decenas de miles de sudaneses murieron. Nadie sabe el número exacto. La ONU estima que las víctimas son al menos 20.000, pero algunas ONG hablan de más de 60.000. El enviado especial de Estados Unidos, Tom Perriello, dijo el año pasado que los muertos ya superaban los 150.000. Cualquier dato es creíble.

Advertisement

Además, hay 12 millones de desplazados internos y otros cuatro millones en países vecinos.

Niños huérfanos reciben un poco de hojas hervidas en un orfanato en Bruam  en las montañas Nuba (Foto de archivo REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya)

Niños huérfanos reciben un poco de hojas hervidas en un orfanato en Bruam en las montañas Nuba (Foto de archivo REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya)

Según un reporte de Naciones Unidas, más de la mitad de la población sufre altos niveles de inseguridad alimentaria aguda. Esa cifra incluye a 8,1 millones de personas en condiciones de emergencia y 638.000 en catástrofe o hambruna, de acuerdo al informe.

Esperanza Santos tiene 45 años, es de Madrid y desde hace un año se encuentra en Sudán como coordinadores de emergencias de la misión de Médicos sin Fronteras (MSF) en el país. Ha estado en distintas zonas de Darfur y Puerto Sudán.

Advertisement

Leé también: Mientras Donald Trump detiene a inmigrantes, otro país de la región deporta en silencio a miles de extranjeros

“La guerra ha afectado a todo el país. Empezó en Jartum, la capital, y se extendió a Darfur, al oeste del país, y las principales ciudades”, contó Santos en diálogo telefónico con TN.

Según dijo, más de dos años ininterrumpidos de violencia han provocado desplazamientos masivos y el colapso de la infraestructura sanitaria.

Advertisement

“No es solo la situación de violencia. No hay un sistema de salud que permita, por ejemplo realizar una campaña de vacunación. Tenemos epidemias una detrás de la otra, de cólera, sarampión, difteria y malaria. No hay agua potable”, resumió.

Esperanza Santos, de Médicos Sin Fronteras (MSF) se encuentra en Sudán (Foto: Cortesía/Esperanza Santos)

Esperanza Santos, de Médicos Sin Fronteras (MSF) se encuentra en Sudán (Foto: Cortesía/Esperanza Santos)

Santos contó que cuando los combates se detienen en una determinada área no hay tiempo suficiente para lograr su recuperación porque la lucha se reanuda tarde o temprano.

“Hay momentos más estables, pero la situación del país es dramática. En Darfur, una de las zonas menos desarrolladas y con más dificultades a nivel humanitario, las necesidades son mayores”, señaló.

Advertisement

El sistema de salud está colapsado

Según graficó, todo el sistema de salud está afectado. Muchos centros no funcionan porque están dañados o carecen de suministros o simplemente porque el personal ha sido desplazado por los combates.

“El sistema de salud no está funcionando en muchas zonas. No hay suministro regular de medicamentos. Ha habido zonas sitiadas durante muchos meses sin ninguna posibilidad de reaprovisionamiento de ningún tipo”, enfatizó.

Leé también: Crece el movimiento “prepper”: quiénes son y cómo se preparan para sobrevivir a fenómenos extremos

Advertisement

Los más perjudicados son los niños y las mujeres embarazadas. “No llegan insumos, hay menos cosas en el mercado y el costo de la comida aumenta. La gente ha perdido su medio de vida y su trabajo. Todo esto afecta a la nutrición. Entonces hay más mortalidad. Es la tormenta perfecta”, comentó Santos.

Aun así, Médicos Sin Fronteras está presente en 11 de los 18 estados del país. Su trabajo incluye apoyar la escasa infraestructura sanitaria, proveer materiales e insumos y dar atención a quienes la necesitan.

Santos se lamentó por la escasa repercusión internacional de esta guerra. “La gente no sabe dónde queda Sudán y mucho menos que está en guerra. Esto te da mucha frustración y rabia”, afirmó.

Advertisement

El director de la Oficina de Asuntos Humanitarios de la ONU, Tom Fletcher, graficó: “Sudán se ha convertido en un triste ejemplo de indiferencia e impunidad en el mundo. Esta es la mayor crisis humanitaria del mundo”.

“Unos 30 millones de personas, la mitad de la población, necesitan ayuda vital como consecuencia de una guerra despiadada”, concluyó.

Sudán, guerra

Advertisement
Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias

Copyright © 2025 NDM - Noticias del Momento | #Noticias #Chimentos #Política #Fútbol #Economía #Sociedad