INTERNACIONAL
Trump administration refines EEOC approach to transgender workplace discrimination claims

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the federal agency responsible for enforcing laws against workplace discrimination, will allow some complaints by transgender workers to proceed, a change from earlier guidance that indefinitely halted cases alleging workplace discrimination against transgender people.
An email was sent earlier this month to leaders of the EEOC in which Thomas Colclough, director of the agency’s Office of Field Programs, said if new transgender worker complaints involve «hiring, discharge or promotion, you are clear to continue processing these charges.»
Even with the change, those complaints will still face higher scrutiny than other workplace discrimination cases, requiring approval from acting EEOC chair Andrea Lucas, who was appointed by President Donald Trump earlier this year.
Lucas has said one of her priorities would be «defending the biological and binary reality of sex and related rights.»
UTAH BATH & BODY WORKS MANAGER SAYS SHE WAS FIRED OVER COMPANY’S PRONOUN POLICY
Acting EEOC chair Andrea Lucas has said one of her priorities would be «defending the biological and binary reality of sex and related rights.» (Getty Images)
Since Trump returned to the presidency in January, the EEOC has shifted away from its previous interpretation of civil rights law that included prohibiting workplace discrimination against people based on their gender identity.
This comes after the agency issued a landmark finding a decade ago that a transgender civilian employee of the U.S. Army had faced discrimination when her employer refused to use the worker’s preferred pronouns or allow the individual to use bathrooms based on gender identity rather than biological sex.
Under Lucas’ authority, the EEOC has dropped several lawsuits alleging discrimination against transgender workers. Lucas defended that decision during her Senate committee confirmation hearing last month, citing Trump’s executive order stating that there are only two sexes — male and female.
But she also acknowledged that the 2020 Supreme Court ruling Bostock v. Clayton County «did clearly hold that discriminating against someone on the basis of sex included firing an individual who is transgender or based on their sexual orientation.»
US EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION DEMANDS 20 LAW FIRMS DISCLOSE DEI EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES

Since Trump returned to the presidency in January, the EEOC has shifted away from its previous interpretation of civil rights law. (Andrew Harrer/Getty Images)
Colclough said in his email that the EEOC will consider transgender discrimination complaints that «fall squarely under» the Supreme Court’s ruling, including cases involving hiring, firing and promotion, which reversed an earlier policy that de-prioritized cases filed on behalf of transgender workers.
«Under federal law, charge inquiries and charges of discrimination made to the EEOC are confidential,» an EEOC spokesperson told The Associated Press, while declining to comment on the specifics of its updated policy.
«Pursuant to Title VII and as statutorily required, the EEOC is, has been, and will continue to accept and investigate charges on all bases protected by law, and to serve those charges to the relevant employer,» the spokesperson added.
But even the cases the EEOC will consider under the Supreme Court ruling must still be reviewed by a senior attorney advisor and sent to Lucas for final approval.
The expanded review process for transgender cases is not typical of other discrimination complaints and reflects the agency’s increased scrutiny of these cases, according to former EEOC commissioner Chai Feldblum, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama.

Under current leadership, the EEOC has dropped several lawsuits alleging discrimination against transgender workers. (Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
«It is a slight improvement because it will allow certain claims of discrimination to proceed,» Feldblum told The Associated Press. «But overall it does not fix a horrific and legally improper situation currently occurring at the EEOC.»
Colclough’s email did not clarify how long the review process might take, or whether cases that include additional claims, such as harassment or retaliation, would be eligible to proceed, and the EEOC declined to address those questions.
«This is not the EEOC being clear to either its own staff or to the public what charges are going to be processed,» Feldblum said. «This is not a panacea.»
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
INTERNACIONAL
Pritzker rails against ‘un-American’ possible National Guard deployment by Trump

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker blasted President Donald Trump as a «wannabe dictator» Monday, accusing him of trying to «occupy» Chicago with National Guard troops after reports the White House is preparing a possible deployment as soon as September.
The Democrat railed against a Washington Post report detailing the potential move, warning that Trump was escalating rhetoric against Chicago and its leaders over crime.
«This is exactly the type of overreach that our country’s founders warned against,» Pritzker said at a press conference in front of Trump Tower in downtown Chicago.
‘SLAP IN THE FACE’: MAJOR BLUE STATE GOVERNOR SIGNS BILL OPENING FINANCIAL AID TO ILLEGALS
«What President Trump is doing is unprecedented and unwarranted. It is illegal. It is unconstitutional. It is un-American.»
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker speaks to reporters in front of Trump Tower in Chicago as he denounces a potential plan by the Trump administration to deploy National Guard troops to the city. (Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune)
Pritzker vowed to fight the move in court, accusing Trump of trying to occupy a U.S. city for political gain.
«Go talk to the people of Chicago who are enjoying a gorgeous afternoon in this city… ask if they want their neighborhoods turned into a war zone by a wannabe dictator,» Pritzker said, flanked by Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and other local officials.
«Donald Trump wants to use the military to occupy a U.S. city, punish his dissidents and score political points. If this were happening in any other country, we would have no trouble calling it what it is — a dangerous power grab.»
The Democrat said Trump was trying to militarize a blue state while simultaneously slashing $800 million in federal crime prevention grants. Most of the grants were headed to nonprofits and local community groups, not to police departments or federal law enforcement.
Pritzker said that crime rates are down in Chicago, the nation’s third-largest city, and that Trump’s narrative of the city being engulfed in crime is manufactured.
For instance, he said that murders are down 32% compared to last year and nearly cut in half since 2021.
«You are neither wanted here nor needed here,» Pritzker added. «We will see the Trump administration in court. We will use every lever at our disposal to protect the people of Illinois and their rights.»
Hours earlier Trump suggested he would prefer to be «asked» before sending troops. He has been floating the idea of deploying the National Guard in Chicago, replicating operations in Washington D.C. which has also seen the federal government take control of the local police. More than 1,000 arrests have been made and the capital has gone 11 days straight without a homicide, according to the latest figures.

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker delivers remarks in Chicago alongside Mayor Brandon Johnson and other officials after reports the White House is preparing to deploy National Guard troops to the city. (Kamil Krzaczynski/AFP via Getty Images)
ILLINOIS GOV CALLS FOR MASS PROTESTS AGAINST TRUMP ADMIN: GOP ‘CANNOT KNOW A MOMENT OF PEACE’
National Guard units sent without state approval are generally restricted to defending federal property and personnel. When Guard troops were deployed to Los Angeles in June over anti-ICE protests, they were confined to federal buildings and escort duties for immigration agents. In Washington, D.C., which is under federal jurisdiction, Guard units have conducted armed patrols alongside local police.
«In a certain way, you really want to be asked to go,» Trump told reporters, before taking a jab at Pritzker: «He has to spend more time in the gym.»
Trump continued his attacks on Pritzker and ripped the Windy City’s crime record.
«I’m thinking about you know, when I have some slob like Pritzker criticizing us before we even go there. I made the statement that next year be Chicago because, as you all know, Chicago’s a killing field right now and they don’t acknowledge it. And they say, we don’t need him.»
Chicago recorded 573 homicides in 2024, marking the 13th straight year Chicago has led the nation in total murders, according to Chicago Police Department data compiled by Wirepoints.
According to the Council on Criminal Justice’s year-end 2024 update, aggravated assaults declined by 4% compared to 2023 but remained 4% higher than in 2019, gun assaults fell 15% though they were still 5% above 2019 levels, and carjackings dropped 32% year-over-year yet were 25% higher than in 2019.
Meanwhile, Johnson echoed Pritzker’s defiance, insisting Chicagoans don’t want a «military occupation.»
«We believe that you don’t solve crime by sending in the military,» Johnson said. «The last thing that Chicagoans want is someone from the outside of our city who doesn’t know our city, trying to dictate and tell us what our city needs.»

President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office as he continues to defend a potential National Guard deployment to Chicago. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Johnson called the plan «a stunt,» saying Trump’s targeting of Chicago is rooted in racism.
«We cannot incarcerate our way out of violence. We’ve already tried that, and we’ve ended up with the largest prison population in the world without solving the problems of crime and violence,» Johnson said.
«The addiction on jails and incarceration in this country. We have moved past that. It is racist. It is immoral. It is unholy. And it is not the way to drive violence down.»
chicago,donald trump,jb pritzker,crime world,politics,washington dc,illinois
INTERNACIONAL
Esperando en el frente: La maternidad en el ejército ucraniano

Elección
Licencias
INTERNACIONAL
El astrofísico Adam Becker advirtió sobre la obsesión de la élite tecnológica por la inmortalidad y el control global

Un nuevo libro de Adam Becker, reseñado por MIT Technology Review, examina la situación del progreso de la inteligencia artificial (IA), argumentando que hay una perspectiva compartida por los principales magnates tecnológicos del sector, que siguen raíces filosóficas e históricas. En “More Everything Forever” (Más de todo para siempre), Becker expone que figuras como Sam Altman, Jeff Bezos y Elon Musk impulsan una ideología que, según él, promete consecuencias profundas para la sociedad y el planeta.
El libro parte de la premisa de que los líderes tecnológicos más influyentes no solo buscan innovar, sino que intentan rediseñar el destino de la humanidad. Sus proyectos van desde alinear la IA con los intereses humanos y crear una superinteligencia capaz de resolver problemas globales, hasta fusionar la mente con la tecnología para alcanzar la inmortalidad, establecer colonias autosuficientes en Marte y expandirse por el cosmos. Becker sostiene que todas estas metas comparten una misma base: la “ideología de la salvación tecnológica”.
Entre los líderes de este movimiento destacan Sam Altman, CEO de Open AI; Jeff Bezos, fundador de Amazon e impulsor de la exploración espacial privada; Elon Musk, creador de Tesla, SpaceX y GROK, conocido por sus ambiciones interplanetarias; Marc Andreessen, autor del “Manifiesto Tecno-Optimista”; y Ray Kurzweil, promotor de la Singularidad. Todos ellos, de acuerdo al análisis de MIT Technology Review, mantienen la convicción de que la tecnología debe resolver cualquier desafío y que el crecimiento perpetuo es moralmente necesario.
Becker identifica tres rasgos principales de esta ideología: fe inquebrantable en la tecnología como solución universal, creencia en el crecimiento sin fin y una obsesión cuasi religiosa por superar los límites humanos. Según el autor, hay una doctrina común donde “se encuentra la idea de escape y trascendencia, así como la promesa de un futuro asombroso, lleno de maravillas inimaginables, siempre que no se obstaculice el progreso tecnológico”. Esta visión, según Becker, permite a la élite tecnológica presentar la expansión de sus empresas como un imperativo moral y justificar cualquier acción en nombre del avance.

La obra explora las ideas y movimientos que nutren esta cosmovisión. Becker traza un recorrido que va desde los fundamentos del transhumanismo de Max More en los años noventa hasta la actual ideología de la salvación tecnológica, pasando por la llamada “ideología californiana”, una mezcla de valores contraculturales y neoliberales. Conceptos como el altruismo efectivo, el racionalismo, el extropianismo, el aceleracionismo efectivo, el futurismo y el singularitarianismo figuran como variantes del mismo núcleo ideológico. El punto en común es claro: el futuro será extraordinario si se permite la innovación sin trabas.
En este entramado, la Singularidad, momento en que la IA supere a la capacidad humana y y pueda mejorarse a sí misma de forma autónoma, ocupa un lugar central. Kurzweil sostiene la existencia de una “Ley de Rendimientos Acelerados”, según la cual el progreso tecnológico sigue una curva exponencial. Becker cuestiona este supuesto y advierte sobre la mala interpretación de fenómenos como la Ley de Moore, que describe la duplicación de transistores en los chips pero no garantiza un avance perpetuo.

Becker advierte sobre los riesgos sociales, ambientales y políticos de la ideología del progreso sin fin. Su preocupación se basa en que la fe en la salvación tecnológica sea utilizada como excusa para la depredación ambiental, la acumulación de poder, la evasión de regulaciones, además de distraer de los problemas reales del presente a favor de futuros hipotéticos. Sostiene que en la última década, la falta de regulación y de escrutinio mediático permitió que estas visiones se instalaran sin oposición significativa.
El atractivo de estas ideas no se limita a la élite de Silicon Valley, argumenta Becker. Muchas personas encuentran consuelo en la promesa de un futuro predecible, la posibilidad de trascender la muerte y la sensación de que alguien —o algo— tiene el control. El autor observa que en comunidades racionalistas y de altruismo efectivo, es habitual encontrar antiguos evangélicos, lo que sugiere un paralelismo entre la función de la religión y la narrativa tecnológica.
A lo largo del análisis, MIT Technology Review resalta la advertencia de Becker sobre el peligro de aceptar estas visiones como inevitables. Insiste en que solo reconociendo el carácter problemático de estos sueños tecnológicos se podrá desafiar su supuesta predestinación. Cuando la sociedad advierta que esos futuros prometidos podrían transformarse en pesadillas colectivas, la sensación de inevitabilidad que rodea la ideología de la salvación tecnológica comenzará a desvanecerse.
Adam Becker,Transhumanismo,MIT Technology Review,Singularidad,Salvación tecnológica
- DEPORTE3 días ago
Chile organizó una colecta para que la familia del hincha que fue operado por fractura de cráneo pueda viajar a la Argentina
- POLITICA3 días ago
El fuerte cruce entre Victoria Villarruel y Mayra Mendoza por el caso de los audios
- DEPORTE3 días ago
¿Cómo va el historial entre Rosario Central y Newell´s Old Boys y quién ganó más?