INTERNACIONAL
Trump’s modest spending cuts package survives narrow Senate vote as some Republicans break ranks

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
What can you get for $9.4 billion?
3G Capital recently purchased footwear giant Skechers for $9.4 billion.
$9.4 billion could cover your rent for a pretty nice apartment in New York City for more than 40,000 years.
Yes, it will just be you and the cockroaches by then.
Or, you could pay the cost of every major disaster in the past four decades – ranging from Chernobyl to Fukushima to Hurricane Sandy.
‘LONG OVERDUE’: SENATE REPUBLICANS RAM THROUGH TRUMP’S CLAWBACK PACKAGE WITH CUTS TO FOREIGN AID, NPR
But $9.4 billion isn’t a lot when cast against nearly $7 trillion in annual spending by the federal government.
And it’s really not much money when you consider that the U.S. is about slip into the red to the tune of $37 trillion.
Which brings us to the Congressional plan to cancel spending. That is, a measure from Republicans and the Trump Administration to rescind spending lawmakers already appropriated in March. The House and Senate are now clawing back money lawmakers shoved out the door for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and foreign aid programs under USAID. The original proposal cut $9.4 billion. But that figure dwindled to $9 billion – after the Senate restored money for «PEPFAR,» a President George W. Bush era program to combat AIDS worldwide.
In other words, you may have a couple thousand years lopped off from your rent-controlled apartment in New York City. Of course that hinges on what Democratic mayoral nominee Zorhan Mamdani decides to do, should he win election this fall.
Anyway, back to Congressional spending. Or «un-spending.»
The House passed the original version of the bill in June, 216-214. Flip one vote and the bill would have failed on a 215-215 tie. Then it was on to the Senate. Republicans had to summon Vice President Vance to Capitol Hill to break a logjam on two procedural votes to send the spending cancellation bill to the floor and actually launch debate. Republicans have a 53-47 advantage in the Senate. But former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., along with Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska and Susan Collins, R-Maine, voted nay – producing a 50-50 tie.
Fox is told some Senate Republicans are tiring of McConnell opposing the GOP – and President Trump – on various issues. That includes the nay votes to start debate on the spending cancellation bill as well as his vote against the confirmation of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in January.
«He used to be the Leader. He was always telling us we need to stick together,» said one GOP senator who requested anonymity. «Now he’s off voting however he wants? How time flies.»
Note that McConnell led Senate Republicans as recently as early January.
But McConnell ultimately voted for the legislation when the Senate approved it 51-48 at 2:28 am ET Thursday morning.
Murkowski and Collins were the only noes. The services of Vice President Vance weren’t needed due to McConnell’s aye vote and the absence of Sen. Tina Smith, D-Minn. She fell ill and was admitted to George Washington Hospital for exhaustion.
As for the senior senator from Alaska, one GOP senator characterized it as «Murkowski fatigue.»
«She always asking. She’s always wanting more,» groused a Senate Republican.
Murkowski secured an agreement on rural hospitals in exchange for her vote in favor of the Big, Beautiful Bill earlier this month. However, Murkowski did not secure more specificity on the DOGE cuts or help with rural, public radio stations in Alaska on the spending cut plan.
SENATE TO DEBATE TRUMP’S $9B CLAWBACK BILL AFTER DRAMATIC LATE-NIGHT VOTES
«My vote is guided by the imperative of coming from Alaskans. I have a vote that I am free to cast, with or without the support of the President. My obligation is to my constituents and to the Constitution,» said Murkowski. «I don’t disagree that NPR over the years has tilted more partisan. That can be addressed. But you don’t need to gut the entire Corporation for Public Broadcasting.»
In a statement, Collins blasted the Trump administration for a lack of specificity about the precision of the rescissions request. Collins, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee in charge of the federal purse strings, also criticized the administration a few months ago for a paucity of detail in the President’s budget.
«The rescissions package has a big problem – nobody really knows what program reductions are in it. That isn’t because we haven’t had time to review the bill,» said Collins in a statement. «Instead, the problem is that OMB (the Office of Management and Budget) has never provided the details that would normally be part of this process.»
Collins wasn’t the only Republican senator who worried about how the administration presented the spending cut package to Congress. Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., fretted about Congress ceding the power of the purse to the administration. But unlike Collins, Wicker supported the package.

Director of the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Russell (Russ) Vought speaks to reporters outside the West Wing of the White House on July 17, 2025, in Washington, DC. (ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS)
«If we do this again, please give us specific information about where the cuts will come. Let’s not make a habit of this,» said Wicker. «If you come back to us again from the executive branch, give us the specific amounts in the specific programs that will be cut.»
DOGE recommended the cuts. In fact, most of the spending reductions targeted by DOGE don’t go into effect unless Congress acts. But even the $9.4 billion proved challenging to cut.
«We should be able to do that in our sleep. But there is looking like there’s enough opposition,» said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on Fox Business.
So to court votes, GOP leaders salvaged $400 million for PEPFAR.
«There was a lot of interest among our members in doing something on the PEPFAR issue,» said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. «You’re still talking about a $9 billion rescissions package – even with that small modification.»
The aim to silence public broadcasting buoyed some Republicans.
HOMELAND SECURITY HALTS $18.5M IN TAXPAYER FUNDS FOR ‘RADICAL’ PROGRAMS
«North Dakota Public Radio – about 26% of their budget is federal funding. To me, that’s more of an indictment than it is a need,» said Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D.
But back to the $9 billion. It’s a fraction of one-tenth of one percent of all federal funding. And DOGE recommended more than a trillion dollars in cuts.
«What does this say for the party if it can’t even pass this bill, this piddling amount of money?» yours truly asked Sen. John Kennedy, R-La.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Democrat from New York, arrives to speak to members of the media at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, July 17, 2025. Republicans are set to succeed in their decades-long quest to end federal funding for public broadcasting after the Senate passed a $9 billion package of cuts derived from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency effort. Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images
«I think we’re going to lose a lot of credibility. And we should,» replied Kennedy.
But the House needed to sync up with the Senate since it changed the bill – stripping the cut for AIDS funding. House conservatives weren’t pleased that the Senate was jamming them again – just two weeks after major renovations to the House version of the Big, Beautiful Bill. But they accepted their fate.
«It’s disappointing that we’re $37 trillion in debt. This to me was low-hanging fruit,» said Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo. «At the end of the day, I’ll take a base hit, right? It’s better than nothing.»
White House Budget Director Russ Vought is expected to send other spending cancellation requests to Congress in the coming months. The aim is to target deeper spending reductions recommended by DOGE.
But it doesn’t auger well for future rescissions bills if it’s this much of a battle to trim $9 trillion.
What can you get for that much money? For Republicans, it’s not much.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Republicans were swinging for the fences with spending cuts.
But in the political box score, this is recorded as just a base hit.
INTERNACIONAL
El gobierno impulsa ampliación de áreas agrícolas para potenciar producción de tomate en El Salvador

El Gobierno de El Salvador está ampliando las áreas cultivadas dentro del Programa Aumento a la Producción, con un enfoque especial en el impulso al cultivo de tomate. El viceministro ad honorem de Agricultura y Ganadería, Óscar Domínguez, informó que se están sumando 80 manzanas destinadas exclusivamente a la siembra de tomate a cielo abierto, acompañadas por 18 estructuras de cultivo protegido, cada una con una extensión cercana a una manzana.
Este esfuerzo busca aprovechar terrenos con vocación agrícola, fortalecer el trabajo en el campo y consolidar el compromiso de los productores. Domínguez explicó que el avance en la producción de tomate es parte de una apuesta nacional por expandir la frontera agrícola, generar más oportunidades para los habitantes rurales y mejorar la autosuficiencia alimentaria. Además, precisó que estas nuevas áreas son adicionales a las 2,400 manzanas ya activas en otros rubros agrícolas, lo que refleja la magnitud del programa y su impacto creciente en el territorio salvadoreño.
El viceministro indicó que la ampliación de las áreas productivas responde a los resultados sólidos obtenidos en 2025 y que la meta para el ciclo actual es clara, pues busca sumar mayor producción.

“La apuesta es clara: más tierra cultivada, mayor producción y más oportunidades para nuestra gente del campo”, afirmó Domínguez en una publicación en la red social X, donde adelantó que en el corto plazo se prevé un avance mayor.
El anuncio de la ampliación de las manzanas cultivadas con tomate forma parte de la estrategia integral que el Gobierno impulsa en diferentes cultivos. El pasado 23 de enero, el Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería comunicó avances en la producción de frijol, informando que se han cosechado 12,500 manzanas durante el ciclo 2025-2026. La publicación en redes sociales de esta cartera de Estado señaló que el campo salvadoreño continúa fortaleciéndose con más producción y más agricultores apoyados, lo que contribuye a sembrar seguridad alimentaria para toda la población.
El Programa Aumento a la Producción contempla también la siembra de 10,000 manzanas de maíz con tecnología avanzada, con el objetivo de triplicar la productividad y reducir la dependencia de importaciones. Entre sus componentes centrales figuran la entrega de insumos ganaderos y la modernización del sector cafetalero, involucrando la protección de 20,000 manzanas de café y la siembra de 700 manzanas con variedades de alto rendimiento tipo Central Standard. Estas acciones están dirigidas a garantizar mejores rendimientos y hacer frente a los desafíos climáticos, diversificando la producción agrícola nacional.

En este contexto, el programa ha sumado aliados estratégicos de alcance internacional. La Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO) y el Programa Mundial de Alimentos (WFP, por sus siglas en inglés) anunciaron recientemente su incorporación como socios de la iniciativa. La FAO reafirmó su apoyo al Gobierno salvadoreño para fortalecer capacidades locales y respaldar el aumento sostenible de la producción, con el objetivo de consolidar la seguridad alimentaria en el país. La colaboración se enmarca dentro del Programa Aumento a la Producción y aspira a promover prácticas agrícolas y ganaderas más sostenibles.
El viceministro de Agricultura subrayó en esa oportunidad la importancia de contar con el respaldo de la FAO y el WFP, dos organismos que, tras una reciente gira de campo por las principales zonas productoras, confirmaron su participación y expresaron satisfacción por el progreso alcanzado. “Este año duplicaremos los resultados obtenidos el año pasado. El Salvador produce cada vez más de su propia comida, fortaleciendo nuestra seguridad alimentaria y el desarrollo del sector agropecuario”, puntualizó el funcionario, quien valoró la rapidez con que se han alcanzado los objetivos en tan solo un año de implementación.
Las acciones desplegadas cuentan con la supervisión de entidades internacionales, lo que representa, según las autoridades locales, un cambio cualitativo en la manera en que El Salvador enfrenta los desafíos de la seguridad alimentaria y la producción sostenible. El modelo de trabajo conjunto entre el Gobierno, los productores nacionales y los organismos internacionales refuerza la meta de que el país logre autosuficiencia alimentaria y promueva el desarrollo rural en el mediano y largo plazo.

Con la ampliación de 80 manzanas dedicadas al cultivo de tomate, el Programa Aumento a la Producción consolida su papel como motor del desarrollo agrícola y como ejemplo de cooperación entre el Estado, los agricultores y la comunidad internacional.
corresponsal:Desde San Salvador, El Salvador
INTERNACIONAL
La caída del dictador y sus errores de cálculo: Tras hablar con Donald Trump, Nicolás Maduro estaba convencido que Estados Unidos no atacaría Venezuela

INTERNACIONAL
‘Give me liberty’ Founding Father’s descendant blasts Spanberger’s redistricting push

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
FIRST ON FOX: Virginia Republicans offered their own response to Gov. Abigail Spanberger’s Democratic Party rebuttal to President Donald Trump’s State of the Union, featuring a descendant of the famously outspoken Founding Father Patrick Henry.
Del. Anne Ferrell Tata, R-Virginia Beach, is a direct descendant of Gov. Patrick Henry’s sister Elizabeth, a lineage Tata said stems from the first days of the Old Dominion and one she does not often discuss.
But, as Tata mentioned in recent floor remarks, Henry — famous for his «Give me liberty, or give me death» speech to the Second Virginia Convention at St. John’s Church of Richmond in 1775 — proved that «concern about the government silencing its citizens is not new.»
In her response to Spanberger, Tata condemned the governor’s partisan interest in redistricting out all but one Virginia congressional Republican, suggesting it is the new way some politicians are trying to silence citizens.
Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger offers the Democratic response to the State of the Union. (Mike Kropf/Getty Images)
«A few years ago, Virginians did something rare. We agreed the old redistricting system wasn’t working. Too much power in the hands of politicians, too little trust from the public,» Tata said.
«Voters approved a constitutional reform to remove politicians from the process and Governor Spanberger, who was in Congress at the time, praised that change and spoke at length about the corrosive effects of gerrymandering on our democracy. It wasn’t easy. It required compromise. It required restraint and it required trust.»
Tata noted that Indiana, a Republican-led state, and legislative leaders in Maryland, a Democrat-led state, both opposed similar efforts to create a map that sweeps away the political minority’s voice.
«Both chose to respect the rules. Both chose to keep the promise they made to voters,» she said.
WHO IS ABIGAIL SPANBERGER, AND WHY DID DEMOCRATS CHOOSE HER FOR TO THEIR STATE OF THE UNION RESPONSE?

Virginia Gov. Patrick Henry delivers his «Give me liberty…» speech in Richmond. (Smith Collection/Getty Images)
«Here in Virginia, our governor and her allies faced the same test. And they chose power instead.»
«This isn’t about maps. It isn’t about party. It’s about whether reform means something when it costs you.»
Tata said that when leaders like Spanberger «abandon voter-approved reform» they prove why voters do not trust their political system.
«Virginians deserve leaders who keep their word, especially when it’s hard. That is the standard, and it should apply to all of us,» Tata said.
In prior remarks to the state House chamber, Tata said that Henry warned against a government that «grows too strong and too indifferent to the natural rights of its citizens; rights bestowed by God.»
«That warning remains as poignant as ever. Every voter deserves an equal vote in this government, regardless of zip code.»
VIRGINIA REPUBLICANS CHARGE ‘POWER GRAB’ AS DEMOCRAT WHO BACKED REDISTRICTING RUNS FOR CONGRESS
Henry, who was born in Hanover and lived most of his life at «Red Hill» in Brookneal, was Virginia’s first governor — and his name can be found throughout the commonwealth — from the formerly conjoined Patrick and Henry counties far to the southwest to US-1 being divided into Patrick and Henry Streets in the Washington suburb of Alexandria.
In his famous address, Henry warned that armed conflict with England was becoming inevitable, and that lawmakers assembled on Church Hill should agree to arm the colony for its own defense.
«I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death,» Henry boomed as he concluded his remarks.
Earlier in his speech, Henry said that men are naturally «apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts.»
«Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.»
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
That address has gone on to live as one of early America’s most important events, and is often recited around its anniversary in Richmond.
Fox News Digital reached out to Spanberger for comment.
abigail spanberger,maryland,governors,virginia,republicans elections
POLITICA2 días agoDaiana Fernández Molero defendió la reforma laboral: “Va a haber mayor creación de empleo porque va a ser más fácil contratar en blanco”
POLITICA10 horas agoJorge Macri prepara su discurso para abrir el año legislativo: el deseo de reelección y el espejo en Bukele
POLITICA2 días ago“Nos hacemos cargo”: Patricia Bullrich admitió un error del Gobierno en la inclusión del artículo de las licencias médicas















