INTERNACIONAL
La Contraloría de Panamá pidió anular el contrato que permitió al régimen chino operar dos puertos estratégicos del Canal

La Contraloría General de la República de Panamá presentó este miércoles dos demandas ante la Corte Suprema de Justicia con el objetivo de anular el contrato de concesión que permite a la empresa Panama Ports Company (PPC), subsidiaria del conglomerado hongkonés CK Hutchison Holdings, operar dos de los principales puertos del país. Las acciones legales surgen en medio de un proceso de venta global de activos portuarios de la firma china y de crecientes tensiones entre Washington y Beijing sobre el control estratégico de infraestructura en América Latina.
Una de las demandas busca que la Corte declare inconstitucional el contrato original, firmado en 1997, que otorgó a PPC la concesión para operar los puertos de Balboa, en el Pacífico, y Cristóbal, en el Atlántico. La segunda impugna la renovación automática por 25 años aprobada en 2021, alegando que no se siguieron los procedimientos legales establecidos.
“El deber de esta Contraloría es defender los dineros de los panameños y siempre estar a la defensa de los mejores intereses nacionales”, afirmó el contralor Anel Flores en conferencia de prensa. Añadió que el contrato fue “leonino y abusivo contra los intereses del país”.

Según el informe de auditoría que sustenta las demandas, entregado por la Contraloría en abril, la empresa habría incumplido obligaciones de inversión, generado perjuicios económicos al Estado y retenido fondos que legalmente correspondían al Tesoro panameño. “Más de 1.300 millones no entraron a las arcas nacionales”, sostuvo Flores. “Esa gente vio para otro lado y no puso atención a lo que tenían que hacer, que era cuidar los bienes de todos los panameños”.
El informe también detectó irregularidades en la adenda que extendió la concesión en 2021. Esa prórroga fue concedida sin pasar por los trámites legales que la normativa exige, según la Contraloría.
El proceso judicial se produce mientras CK Hutchison Holdings, matriz de Panama Ports, negocia la venta de 43 de sus puertos globales —incluidos los de Panamá— al consorcio liderado por la estadounidense BlackRock, en una operación valorada en 23.000 millones de dólares. Sin embargo, la operación generó objeciones del régimen chino, que anunció una revisión del acuerdo comercial. En respuesta, el conglomerado hongkonés manifestó su disposición a incluir a un inversionista estratégico chino en el consorcio, en un intento por facilitar la aprobación de la transacción por parte de Beijing.

Según información publicada por Bloomberg, el gigante estatal chino Cosco evalúa incorporarse al consorcio comprador con derecho a veto. Este posible ingreso ha generado nuevas inquietudes sobre el futuro control de los puertos de Balboa y Cristóbal y ha reactivado el debate sobre la presencia estratégica de China en el canal de Panamá.
“Creo que estamos muy claros que ahí están hablando de transacciones multimillonarias en diferentes latitudes que no incluyen a la República de Panamá, que es la real dueña de los puertos panameños, por ello hemos tomado las acciones que hemos tomado”, declaró Flores.
La situación ha sido señalada por el presidente estadounidense Donald Trump, quien acusó a China de interferir en el canal mediante su control sobre operadores portuarios. Trump calificó la venta a BlackRock como una forma de “recuperación” de la influencia estadounidense sobre una infraestructura considerada clave para el comercio global.
La respuesta de Beijing no se hizo esperar. El gobierno chino, a través de sus medios oficiales, describió la operación como “entregar un cuchillo al rival” y advirtió que la venta de activos estratégicos debe ser evaluada por sus reguladores. La revisión amenaza con bloquear la operación si no se incorporan intereses chinos al paquete de control.
El contrato original de 1997 otorgó a Panama Ports Company el control de los puertos por 25 años, con una participación accionaria estatal del 10 %. En ese entonces, la entrega de activos generó controversia debido a las condiciones del contrato, que fueron consideradas desventajosas para Panamá. La renovación automática en 2021 intensificó esas críticas, con señalamientos de presunta corrupción y falta de transparencia.
“Vimos muchísimas irregularidades. Además, encontramos que no solamente era un contrato malo, sino que era, además, leonino, era abusivo contra los intereses del país”, reiteró Flores.
El Ministerio Público de Panamá mantiene abierta una investigación penal sobre las operaciones de PPC, a partir de la auditoría entregada por la Contraloría. “Esperamos que el procurador de la Nación haga su trabajo, como lo estamos haciendo nosotros”, indicó el contralor.
El caso se inserta en un contexto regional de preocupación por la expansión económica de China en América Latina, especialmente en sectores vinculados a infraestructura crítica y comercio marítimo. Las decisiones judiciales y políticas que surjan en Panamá podrían marcar un precedente sobre los límites de la influencia china en el hemisferio occidental.
(Con información de EFE y AFP)
South America / Central America,PANAMA CITY
INTERNACIONAL
¿Nicolás Maduro en la mira? Estados Unidos dice estar preparado para usar «todo su poder» para frenar narcotráfico en Venezuela

El cartel detrás de la acusación
¿Por qué se llama así y cómo funciona?
Estados Unidos,Venezuela,Nicolás Maduro,Donald Trump,Narcotráfico
INTERNACIONAL
GOP doctors call out health task force for ‘woke distractions’ amid major reform push

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
EXCLUSIVE: The GOP Doctors Caucus is backing a possible effort to overhaul the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, or USPSTF, an independent task force that’s used to determine recommendations on what services health insurance companies in the United States have to cover free of charge.
A letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., led by Rep. Diana Harshbarger, R-Tenn., and Rep. Greg Murphy, R-N.C., and other members of the caucus expressed concerns that the group may be prioritizing social justice issues over other issues.
«Preventive care should be about keeping Americans healthy, not about checking political boxes,» Harshbarger said in a statement.
«The American people deserve a task force that follows the science, acts with urgency and relies on the expertise of front-line doctors. The USPSTF should be leading the charge in President Trump’s ‘Make America Healthy Again’ agenda, not wasting time on woke distractions while chronic disease rates keep climbing.»
REPUBLICAN SENATOR CLAIMS RFK JR. MRNA VACCINE DECISION UNDERMINES TRUMP AGENDA
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., makes his way to the inaugural Great American Farmers Market on the National Mall Aug. 4, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Specifically, the letter asks for «relevant specialists» to be part of the process when making certain recommendations, greater transparency in decision-making and more of a focus on outcomes as opposed to «substantial attention to divisive social issues,» citing «race and gender identity considerations that extend beyond traditional clinical parameters,» according to a news release.
«In 2010, the Affordable Care Act expanded the authority of the USPSTF and tied coverage recommendations to Task Force determinations. However, since the USPSTF’s authority was expanded, the rate of incidence of preventable chronic disease in the United States has only climbed,» the letter states.
The letter was also signed by other members of the caucus, including Reps. Andy Harris, Ronny Jackson, Mike Kennedy, Brian Babin, Sheri Biggs and Bob Onder.
GOP SENATORS RALLY AROUND EFFORT TO END ‘RADICAL WOKENESS’ IN HHS TASK FORCE

Rep. Diana Harshbarger, R-Tenn., speaks during the Republican Study Committee news conference to introduce a «Women’s Bill of Rights» outside the Capitol May 19, 2022. (Getty Images )
Earlier this month, three Republican senators wrote a similar letter raising ideological concerns about the current task force.
«In particular, the USPSTF departed from its proper activities in its December 2023 Health Equity Framework. The framework criticizes ‘equal access to quality health care for all’ as an inadequate goal of public health and announces that the Task Force will instead use equity as ‘a criterion of the ‘public health importance’ of a topic’ for consideration,» that letter stated.
The Wall Street Journal reported that, in July, Kennedy was considering removing members of the board.
DEMS ‘DELIBERATELY OBFUSCATING’ TRUTH ABOUT ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’ WITH THIS CLAIM: WATCHDOG

A sign stands at an entrance to the main campus of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta Feb. 14, 2025. (AP Photo/Jeff Amy, File)
«No final decision has been made on how the USPSTF can better support HHS’ mandate to Make America Healthy Again,» an HHS spokesperson told Fox News Digital in a statement when asked about the WSJ report at the time.
The American Medical Association has opposed an overhaul of the task force.
«USPSTF plays a critical, nonpartisan role in guiding physicians’ efforts to prevent disease and improve the health of patients by helping to ensure access to evidence-based clinical preventive services. As such, we urge you to retain the previously appointed members of the USPSTF and commit to the long-standing process of regular meetings to ensure their important work can continue without interruption,» the AMA wrote.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Meanwhile, a group of physicians, including those from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, America’s Frontline Doctors and the Pennsylvania Direct Primary Care Association, signed another letter in support of possible changes.
The signers wrote that new members should have an «ideological balance to develop recommendations based on facts and science.»
Fox News Digital reached out to HHS for an updated comment.
health,congress,robert f kennedy jr
INTERNACIONAL
Russia launches largest attack on Ukraine this month following Trump’s meetings with Putin, Zelenskyy

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Russia launched its largest attack of the month against Ukraine while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with U.S. President Donald Trump and European leaders at the White House.
The attack also comes after Russian President Vladimir Putin’s meeting with Trump in Alaska last Friday, during which Putin refused an immediate ceasefire and demanded that Ukraine give up its eastern Donetsk region in exchange for an end to the conflict that began with a February 2022 invasion by Moscow. Trump later said he had spoken on the phone with Putin about arrangements for a meeting between the Russian president and Zelenskyy.
Ukraine’s air force said Russia launched 270 drones and 10 missiles into Ukraine on Monday night and into Tuesday, but that 230 drones and six missiles were intercepted or suppressed. The air force reported that 40 drones and four missiles struck across 16 locations, and debris was said to have fallen on three sites.
TRUMP’S PUSH FOR PUTIN-ZELENSKYY TALKS HINGES ON KREMLIN’S CONDITIONS
Russia launched its largest attack of the month against Ukraine on Monday night. (Getty Images)
«While hard work to advance peace was underway in Washington, D.C. … Moscow continued to do the opposite of peace: more strikes and destruction,» Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha wrote on X. «This once again demonstrates how critical it is to end the killing, achieve a lasting peace, and ensure robust security guarantees.»
Energy infrastructure in the central Poltava region was a target of the strikes, according to Ukraine’s Energy Ministry. The casualty figures were not immediately released by officials.
WHITE HOUSE REJECTS ‘BLANK CHECKS’ FOR UKRAINE, PRESSES NATO TO SHOULDER COSTS

Ukraine’s air force said Russia launched 270 drones and 10 missiles into Ukraine. (Getty Images)
«As a result of the attack, large-scale fires broke out,» the ministry said in a statement.
Oil refining and gas facilities were attacked, the ministry added, saying the strikes were the latest «systematic terrorist attacks against Ukraine’s energy infrastructure, which is a direct violation of international humanitarian law.»
The attack was the largest since Russia launched 309 drones and eight missiles into Ukraine on July 31, according to the air force.
Russia’s Defense Ministry said its forces shot down 23 Ukrainian drones on Monday night and into Tuesday morning.

The attack was the largest since Russia launched 309 drones and eight missiles into Ukraine on July 31. (Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Both sides have been targeting infrastructure, including oil facilities.
Zelenskyy had criticized Moscow for earlier strikes on Monday ahead of his meeting at the White House in which at least 14 people were killed and dozens more were injured.
«The Russian war machine continues to destroy lives despite everything. Putin will commit demonstrative killings to maintain pressure on Ukraine and Europe, as well as to humiliate diplomatic efforts. That is precisely why we are seeking assistance to put an end to the killings,» he wrote Monday morning on X.
Reuters contributed to this report.
russia,ukraine,world,conflicts,vladimir putin,volodymyr zelenskyy,donald trump,drones,wars
- POLITICA1 día ago
Pamela David se disculpó con Karina Milei por haber dicho que usaba un reloj de lujo
- POLITICA3 días ago
Cierre de listas: todos los candidatos a senadores y diputados, las sorpresas y los interrogantes que faltan definir
- CHIMENTOS2 días ago
El delicado estado de salud de Cacho Garay: «Sino mejora podrían apuntarle una extremidad»