INTERNACIONAL
Fiscal hawks seek millions for home district projects amid government funding debate

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
House GOP fiscal hawks have requested tens of millions of federal dollars for projects in their home districts for fiscal year 2026, an analysis by Fox News Digital has found.
It’s common practice for congressional lawmakers to request funding for specific community initiatives for the people they represent – measures called «earmarks.» Critics of such funding have often referred to it as «pork,» however.
This coming fiscal year, beginning on Oct. 1, is no different – both Republicans and Democrats have requests totaling over a billion dollars in earmarks so far.
That includes conservatives in the House of Representatives who have been known to criticize what they describe as excessive or bloated government spending.
GOP LAWMAKERS CLASH OVER STRATEGY TO AVERT GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN CRISIS
House conservatives like Reps. Lauren Boebert, Clay Higgins, center, and Andy Harris have requested millions for community funding projects in their districts. (Getty Images)
House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris, R-Md., for instance, has been approved for more than $55 million in federal funding for projects in his district.
The figure includes $9 million for the Middle River Fire Company to make improvements and upgrades to its facilities, and $1 million for the development of a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine program at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore.
The majority of Harris’ requests are aimed at rural development in his district and the Army Corps of Engineers. Three earmarks were requested for clean water initiatives.
Harris told Fox News Digital when reached for comment on the funds, «These awards are certified to directly benefit taxpayers in the district—drawing from existing grant programs that are funded annually. It’s far better for elected members of Congress to designate where that money goes than to leave those decisions to unelected federal bureaucrats. There are no additional funds appropriated for Community Project Funding – they all fall within the agency’s appropriation.»
Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., a self-described deficit hawk, was approved for just over $10 million so far. That includes over $4 million for Flexible Neutron Source, a research tool at the University of Tennessee, and $2 million for veterans housing in Knox County.
LONGTIME BIDEN AIDE SAYS HE STOOD TO EARN UP TO $8M HAD PRESIDENT WON RE-ELECTION
House Freedom Caucus member Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., was approved for more than $18 million in earmarks – with the largest request being $4,200,000 for the Silicon Bayou Semiconductor Technology Center at the University of Louisiana, Lafayette.
Higgins’ total sum also includes funding for Army Corps of Engineers projects, as well as rural hospital, law enforcement and clean water initiatives.
He also submitted a joint request with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., for $131,500,000 toward a levee and floodgate system, called the Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico Project, aimed at storm damage prevention.
Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., another member of the House Freedom Caucus, got nearly $15 million in community funding projects approved, chiefly aimed at clean water programs and highway infrastructure.
Boebert was vehemently against earmarks when she first came to Congress. Her opinion has changed since then, however, due to Republican-led changes to the process – which she explained in a 2023 op-ed in the Aspen Times.

Rep. Thomas Massie got $5 million approved for airport improvements. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
She made a similar argument to Fox News Digital when reached for this story: «I fought for real reforms to the appropriations process in 2023 to make sure my constituents’ tax dollars go to necessary infrastructure projects, not the wasteful and corrupt spending schemes that took place under Nancy Pelosi.»
«My district’s roads are crumbling, and our water keeps getting sent to California, where it’s wasted, because Colorado’s politicians won’t invest in water storage or infrastructure investments. My constituents pay federal taxes just like everyone else, and they should see their dollars benefit their communities instead of being sent to sanctuary cities like Denver,» Boebert said.
Conservative libertarian Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., also got some community funding, though only totaling $5 million approved so far. Massie’s requests so far are all focused on construction and rehabilitation for Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport.
Massie told Fox News Digital of the funding, «I serve on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee because I believe the federal government has a legitimate role in transportation infrastructure, and the legislature has the constitutional authority to direct the funding of those projects.»
«In fact, I have voted in the GOP conference more than once to restore congressionally directed spending in the context of transportation infrastructure,» Massie said.
And Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., chair of the subcommittee for Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE), got nearly $10 million in earmarks approved for her rural-suburban Georgia district.
Those funding requests are largely comprised of infrastructure initiatives, clean water programs, and law enforcement-related projects for Floyd County and other areas.
148 DEMOCRATS BACK NONCITIZEN VOTING IN DC AS GOP RAISES ALARM ABOUT FOREIGN AGENTS
While known as a fiscal hawk, it’s worth noting that the majority of Greene’s criticism of government spending is directed at foreign aid.
Greene said she was glad to be able to provide for her district when reached for comment by Fox News Digital.
«I’m proud to bring federal tax dollars back home to Northwest Georgia – where they belong. My constituents work hard, and for far too long, Washington has sent their money to fund foreign wars, foreign governments and globalist pet projects. When I first got to Congress, I opposed the earmark process because I believed it was a tool of the Swamp. But after seeing how it works today, I’ve realized that if we don’t fight to bring money back to our districts, the money goes elsewhere,» Greene said.
«I’ll never support billions for Ukraine or other endless wars, but I will absolutely fight to secure critical investments in Northwest Georgia, from water systems and sewer expansions to public safety equipment, roads and broadband.»

Greene said she was glad to be able to provide for her district. (Reuters/Jim Bourg)
The aforementioned lawmakers’ spending requests are far from an exhaustive total list across the entire House, but fiscal conservatives’ earmark proposals show just how widespread the practice is within Congress – on both sides of the aisle.
Republicans have made some changes to the process as of FY2025, however, to narrow what’s allowed.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
In an effort to block out funding requests for «woke» or socially progressive policies, GOP appropriators have barred earmarks for most nonprofit organizations.
That move likely saved hundreds of millions of dollars in annual spending, but Democrats decried it as a block on federal funding for LGBT initiatives.
Fox News Digital reached out to spokespeople for Burchett and Higgins for comment but did not receive a response.
house of representatives politics,politics,budget house of representatives politics,government shutdown
INTERNACIONAL
Ni hombres, ni estrés, ni presiones sociales: las comunidades 100% femeninas florecen en China

Las causas
INTERNACIONAL
Trump urges Texas Republicans to swiftly pass redistricting maps while Newsom, California Dems counter

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Major votes are on tap this week in the Texas and California legislatures in the high-stakes battle between Republicans and Democrats over congressional redistricting ahead of next year’s midterm elections.
In Austin, Texas, the GOP-dominated state House of Representatives on Wednesday resumes meeting amid a second straight special session called by conservative Republican Gov. Greg Abbott.
At the top of their to-do list as they return to work is passing a GOP-crafted redistricting map that would create up to five Republican-leaning congressional districts at the expense of currently Democrat-controlled seats. Republicans currently control 25 of the state’s 38 U.S. House seats.
«Please pass this Map, ASAP. THANK YOU TEXAS,» President Donald Trump wrote in a social media post on Monday.
REDISTRICTING BATTLE: FLEEING TEXAS DEMOCRATS RETURN HOME
Texas Speaker of the House Dustin Burrows strikes the gavel as the House calls a special session with a quorum, Monday, Aug. 18, 2025, in Austin. (AP Photo – Eric Gay)
The Republican push in Texas, which comes at Trump’s urging, is part of a broader effort by the GOP across the country to pad their razor-thin House majority to keep control of the chamber in the 2026 midterms, when the party in power traditionally faces political headwinds and loses seats.
Trump and his political team are aiming to prevent what happened during his first term in the White House, when Democrats stormed back to grab the House majority in the 2018 midterm elections.
Republicans in red state Texas enjoy a supermajority in the legislature and the state Senate passed the new congressional maps last week, during the first special legislative session.
TEXAS HOUSE SPEAKER VOWS RUNAWAY DEMS WILL BE ARRESTED IF THEY TRY TO SNEAK HOME OVER WEEKEND
But dozens of Texas Democratic state representatives fled the state to prevent a quorum in the Texas House, effectively preventing Abbott and Republicans from moving forward with new maps.
Many of the Democrats who had fled the state returned on Monday, and made it to the state Capitol building as the House reconvened. They were cheered by supporters as they arrived.

Supporters for the returning Texas democrats chant as members enter the House at the Capitol in Austin, Monday, Aug. 18, 2025. (AP Photo/Stephen Spillman)
But with Republicans outnumbering Democrats 88-62 in the state House, the new maps are expected to pass when lawmakers return on Wednesday.
«Let me also be clear about where we go from here. We are done waiting, and we have quorum. Now is the time for action,» Republican Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows said on Monday.
During the walkout, Abbott and Republican state attorney general Ken Paxton sued to try and remove some of the absent Democratic lawmakers from office. Meanwhile, GOP Sen. John Cornyn worked to get the FBI’s help in tracking down the AWOL lawmakers. And Burrows issued civil arrest warrants and also pledged to fine the lawmakers $500 per day.
The fleeing Democrats, who set up camp in the blue states of Illinois, New York and Massachusetts, late last week signaled that they would return to Texas after the adjournment of the first special session, and after Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and other top California Democrats unveiled their playbook to counter the push by Trump and Republicans to enact rare – but not unheard of – mid-decade congressional redistricting.
The end of the walkout by the Democrats will lead to the passage of the new maps, but Texas Democrats vow they’ll fight the new state maps in court and say the moves by California are allowing them to pass «the baton.»
CALIFORNIA UNVEILS NEW CONGRESSONAL MAPS TO WIPE OUT FIVE GOP-CONTROLLED SEATS AND COUNTER TRUMP
While the Republican push in Texas to upend the current congressional maps doesn’t face constitutional constraints, Newsom’s path in California is much more complicated.
The governor is moving to hold a special election this year, to obtain voter approval to undo the constitutional amendments that created the non-partisan redistricting commission. A two-thirds majority vote in the Democrat-dominated California legislature would be needed to hold the referendum.
Democrats in Sacramento on Monday unveiled a bill to move forward with the referendum.

California Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas announces a legislative package to advance a partisan effort to redraw the state’s congressional map at a press conference on Monday, Aug. 18, 2025, in Sacramento. (AP Photo/Tran Nguyen)
«California and Californians have been uniquely targeted by the Trump Administration, and we are not going to sit idle while they command Texas and other states to rig the next election to keep power — pursuing more extreme and unpopular policies,» Newsom said Monday in a statement.
The Democrat-dominated legislature is expected to approve the referendum on Thursday. The maps the Democrats unveiled late last week would create up to five more left-leaning congressional districts at the expense of the Republican minority in heavily blue California.
«Here we are in open and plain sight before one vote is cast in the 2026 midterm election and here [Trump] is once again trying to rig the system,» Newsom charged on Thursday.
Last week’s appearance by Newsom, who is considered a likely contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, also served as a fundraising kickoff to raise massive amounts of campaign cash needed to sell the redistricting push statewide in California.

Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom of California speaks during a congressional redistricting event on Aug. 14, 2025, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli )
The nonpartisan redistricting commission, created over 15 years ago, remains popular with most Californians, according to public opinion polling.
That’s why Newsom and California Democratic lawmakers are promising not to scrap the commission entirely, but rather replace it temporarily by the legislature for the next three election cycles.
But Republican former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, who represented a congressional district in California’s Central Valley for 17 years, argued in an appearance on Fox News’ «Sunday Morning Futures» that «when you think about how they drew these lines, there wasn’t one hearing. There is no debate. There’s no input. Even the legislature in California doesn’t have input. The DCCC is just ending it. That is why we need to stop Newsom’s power grab.»
McCarthy, who is helping to lead the GOP fundraising effort to counter Newsom and California Democrats leading up to the likely referendum this fall, said that «November 4th will be the election that people could actually have a say,» as he pointed to polls showing strong support for the current nonpartisan redistricting commission.
A handful of California Republican state lawmakers on Tuesday filed a lawsuit in the state Supreme Court to stop the proposed redistricting reform.
And the push to temporarily replace the commission is also being opposed by other high-profile Republicans. Among the most visible is former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the last Republican elected governor in Democrat-dominated California.

Hollywood movie star and former Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger of California opposes the push to temporarily replace the Golden State’s nonpartisan redistricting commission. (Tristar Media/WireImage)
The longtime Hollywood action star says he’s mobilizing to oppose the push by Newsom to temporarily scrap the state’s nonpartisan redistricting commission.
«I’m getting ready for the gerrymandering battle,» Schwarzenegger wrote in a social media post Friday, which included a photo of the former professional bodybuilding champion lifting weights.
Schwarzenegger, who rose to worldwide fame as the star of the film «The Terminator» four decades ago, wore a T-shirt in the photo that said «terminate gerrymandering.»
Schwarzenegger spokesperson Daniel Ketchell told Politico earlier this month that «he calls gerrymandering evil, and he means that. He thinks it’s truly evil for politicians to take power from people.»
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
«He’s opposed to what Texas is doing, and he’s opposed to the idea that California would race to the bottom to do the same thing,» Ketchell added.
Schwarzenegger, during his tenure as governor, had a starring role in the passage of constitutional amendments in California in 2008 and 2010 that took the power to draw state legislative and congressional districts away from politicians and placed it in the hands of an independent commission.
donald trump,greg abbott,gavin newsom,texas,california,midterm elections,congress
INTERNACIONAL
“La Casa de los Horrores”: el caso británico que anticipó el crimen de Coghlan

En 1994, la calma del barrio de Gloucester, en el suroeste de Inglaterra, se rompió con el ruido seco de las palas golpeando contra algo que no era tierra. La policía británica excavaba el jardín de la casa número 25 de Cromwell Street siguiendo la pista de una joven desaparecida.
Lo que encontraron fue mucho más que un cuerpo: bajo ese pasto verde y prolijo, y tras esas paredes pintadas de blanco, Fred y Rose West habían ocultado durante años un cementerio privado en su propia casa. Una a una fueron apareciendo las víctimas; entre ellas la hija del matrimonio, Heather West.
Leé también: Ley Diego: cuál es el proyecto que impulsa el hermano del joven enterrado al lado de la casa de Cerati
Adolescentes, jóvenes, algunas inquilinas, otras amigas de la familia. Todas atrapadas en una dinámica de abuso, tortura y muerte que se escondía detrás de la apariencia de un hogar corriente.
La historia de esta pareja fue reconstruida en detalle en Fred y Rose West: una historia de terror británica, un documental disponible en Netflix, que muestra entrevistas, archivos policiales y documentos de la investigación que reveló la magnitud de los crímenes.
“La casa de los horrores”: el caso británico que anticipó el crimen de Coghlan. (Foto: Netflix)
Casi 30 años después y a 11.000 kilómetros de distancia, otro barrio residencial —esta vez en Buenos Aires— empezó a vivir, aunque con obvias salvedades, una historia similar. En Coghlan, una zona de casas bajas y veredas arboladas, los obreros que trabajaban en la construcción de un edificio se estremecieron: entre la tierra removida encontraron restos humanos.
Se trataba de Diego Fernández Lima, desaparecido en 1984. Su hallazgo puso fin a más de cuatro décadas de búsqueda y conmocionó a la opinión pública, generando un revuelo mediático comparable al que en su momento provocaron los crímenes de los West en Gran Bretaña.
Los paralelismos entre ambos casos, el de Coghlan y aquel de Gloucester, son inquietantes. En primer lugar, los cuerpos estuvieron enterrados en el jardín de casas aparentemente normales. En las dos viviendas se colgaba ropa al sol, se compartían mate o tazas de té, y se intercambiaban saludos con los vecinos. En Coghlan, los vecinos pidieron justicia con carteles en la puerta de la casa del principal sospechoso del asesinato de Diego Fernández Lima. (Foto: TN)
Asimismo, los hechos permanecieron sin resolverse durante años —cuatro décadas en el caso de Coghlan y casi dos décadas en Gloucester— hasta que la investigación policial y las denuncias familiares obligaron a la Justicia a actuar.
Las similitudes son tan inquietantes como las diferencias. Fred y Rose West actuaron como una pareja criminal en serie, con un método repetido y un pacto de silencio que se extendió durante años.
Leé también: Ley Diego: cuál es el proyecto que impulsa el hermano del joven enterrado al lado de la casa de Cerati
En Coghlan, hasta ahora, la investigación apunta a un único homicidio confirmado, aunque las autoridades no descartan que los hallazgos iniciales abran nuevas líneas. Lo que sí comparten ambos casos es el elemento más perturbador: la prolongada convivencia de un barrio entero con un crimen enterrado a centímetros de sus veredas.
Fred y Rose West habían construido un pacto oscuro que comenzó mucho antes de mudarse a Cromwell Street. Fred, con antecedentes de robo y abuso infantil, y Rose, una adolescente cuando quedó embarazada de su marido, unieron sus vidas y convirtieron su hogar en un espacio de terror y muerte.

Fred y Rose West se casaron en 1972, cuando ella tenía 16 años y estaba embarazada de su primogénita, Heather. (Foto: Cordon Press)
La investigación permitió desenterrar cuerpos en el sótano y el jardín, y demostró que la violencia había ocurrido durante casi veinte años. Desde ese momento, la vivienda de Gloucester se conoce popularmente como “La Casa de los Horrores”. Finalmente, Fred se suicidó en prisión en 1995 y Rose fue condenada a cadena perpetua.
En Coghlan, la historia de Diego Fernández Lima plantea preguntas similares: ¿cuántos años permaneció oculto su cuerpo? ¿Cómo pudo pasar inadvertido durante tanto tiempo?
Leé también: Habló el abogado de Cristian Graf, el dueño de la casa del crimen de Coghlan: “Él no tiene nada que ver”
Aun con diferencias evidentes entre los dos casos, las coincidencias son escalofriantes: el horror que se esconde bajo la cotidianeidad, la demora en la investigación y la conmoción de la sociedad -y de la prensa- al descubrir lo que había ocurrido.
Gloucester quedó marcada para siempre por ese número 25 que fue demolido para evitar convertirse en lugar de peregrinaje macabro. En Coghlan, la casa aún está en pie y es parte de un proceso judicial en marcha.
Entre un punto y otro del mapa, las décadas y la geografía parecen disolverse cuando se piensa en esos jardines que esconden secretos, en esos suelos que guardan más de lo que muestran y en el silencio —voluntario o involuntario— que permitió que la verdad permaneciera bajo tierra tanto tiempo.
Crimen, Netflix, coghlan, Gran Bretaña
- POLITICA2 días ago
Pamela David se disculpó con Karina Milei por haber dicho que usaba un reloj de lujo
- POLITICA3 días ago
Cierre de listas: todos los candidatos a senadores y diputados, las sorpresas y los interrogantes que faltan definir
- CHIMENTOS2 días ago
El delicado estado de salud de Cacho Garay: «Sino mejora podrían apuntarle una extremidad»