INTERNACIONAL
Louisiana AG aims to dismantle ‘offensive’ voting law that factors race into redistricting

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
EXCLUSIVE: Louisiana’s attorney general is siding with the people who sued her, an unusual move that comes as part of a case that she hopes will reshape the Voting Rights Act, a decades-old law designed to prevent discrimination in the voting process.
Liz Murrill, who was solicitor general of Louisiana before becoming attorney general last year, told Fox News Digital in an interview on Tuesday that she expected the lawsuit and was prepared to agree with the plaintiffs.
Murrill, an elected Republican, had approved of a congressional map that appeared to favor Democrats, but in a perceived turnabout, she welcomed a lawsuit that challenged the map, saying it was a product of race-conscious «cracking and packing,» where minority voters were plucked out of various districts and consolidated into one.
«We’ve said all along, if section two [of the Voting Rights Act] requires us to do that, then it is in conflict with the equal protection clause, and section two has to yield, because the statute has to yield to the Constitution,» Murrill said, referencing the section of the Voting Rights Act that she is hoping the high court will gut.
SUPREME COURT HEARS PIVOTAL LOUISIANA REDISTRICTING CASE AHEAD OF 2026 MIDTERMS
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill leaves the U.S. Supreme Court after justices heard arguments in a case about social media censorship, in Washington, March 18, 2024. (REUTERS/Bonnie Cash)
Murrill rejects ‘bait-and-switch’ claims
The case has a tangled, yearlong history.
One-third of Louisiana’s voters are black, but the state legislature kept a map after the 2020 census that remained favorable to Republicans. The new map leaned 5-1 in favor of Republicans and included one district with a black majority, rather than two.
Black voters and civil rights groups sued, and through a string of court battles, Louisiana was found to have violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting black voters’ votes.
Instead of the court taking it upon itself to create a new map, Murrill said the alternative was that her state could retain its sovereignty by reluctantly drawing its own 4-2 map that complied with the current Voting Rights Act jurisprudence and court orders, even though she believed the map violated the Constitution.
NEW MAJORITY-BLACK LOUISIANA HOUSE DISTRICT REJECTED, NOVEMBER ELECTION MAP STILL UNCERTAIN

Voting rights activists protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court as the court prepares to hear arguments in a case challenging Louisiana’s congressional map in Washington on Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2025. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Murrill said she did not pull a «bait-and-switch» and has maintained all along that creating a second district with a black majority is problematic.
«All along, we’ve said we don’t think we can do this, but because the courts have told us we have to do it, we’re going to go do it, and then we faced another challenge from non-African American voters, saying it violates the equal protection clause,» Murrill said. «We could have predicted, we did predict that would happen.»
‘So much stereotyping’
The Supreme Court has said it is examining whether the map Louisiana created with two black-majority districts violates the Constitution. Murrill agrees with the people who sued her and contends that it does.
«The only way to create a second majority-minority district would be to carve black voters off from five major cities in Louisiana, north to south, and pile them into a black district,» she told Fox News Digital. «That’s unconstitutional.»
The black voters and civil rights groups who have been advocating two majority-black districts have now reentered the legal fight and argued to the high court that creating such a map gives black voters an equal opportunity to elect the candidates of their choice. This is a requirement of the Voting Rights Act, which says minority groups’ votes cannot be diluted, they argue.
Murrill said that claim «has so much stereotyping of black voters built into it.»
«It’s not fair to just lump these people into large categories because of the color of their skin. That’s offensive,» Murrill said. «And yet, that’s what’s happening in redistricting, and it is being driven by this kind of test about whether the dilution of their votes results in an inability of them to elect candidates of their choice.»
What’s next for Louisiana
Based on Wednesday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court appears poised to rein in race-conscious redistricting, though to what extent remains an open question.

Louisiana AG Liz Murrill speaks to the media during a press conference on Jan. 1, 2025 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Attorney General of Louisiana Liz Murrill )
The high court could make its decision as early as January or as late as June, meaning it is possible that Louisiana could adjust its maps to include one district with a black majority, instead of two, before the next midterms.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
But Murrill said it was difficult to plan for the 2026 elections since the timing and substance of the high court’s decision is unknown.
«At the end of the day, all we can do right now is try and delay the qualifying dates to give the court time to rule and give our legislature time to know what the rules are,» she said.
voting,elections,louisiana,judiciary,supreme court,politics
INTERNACIONAL
Fuertes nevadas en Europa: de Madrid a Londres, las mejores imágenes de las ciudades y los monumentos vestidos de blanco

Cientos de vuelos cancelados en Amsterdam
Londres, Madrid y Frankfurt
INTERNACIONAL
DOJ charges ex-Georgia Democrat lawmaker with allegedly fraudulently obtaining COVID unemployment benefits

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A former Georgia state Democrat lawmaker was federally charged for allegedly fraudulently obtaining nearly $14,000 in coronavirus-era unemployment benefits.
The development comes after Karen Bennett, who used to represent state House District 94, wrote a letter to Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp on Dec. 30 announcing that she would be «retiring» from her position on New Year’s Day after 12 years of service, according to FOX 5 Atlanta.
«As a result of the false application and certifications, Bennett collected a total of $13,940 of PUA [Pandemic Unemployment Assistance Program] benefits and federal supplements to which she was not entitled,» Theodore Hertzberg, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, wrote in a court filing this week.
Prosecutors allege the former representative applied for PUA benefits in May 2020 and disclosed that she worked for the Georgia General Assembly and ran Metro Therapy, a private business where her role consisted «of providing in-home physical therapy services.» They said in the application, Bennett claimed the job was «her primary occupation and primary means of livelihood» and that the «pandemic prevented her from performing any service in connection with» Metro Therapy.
GRETCHEN WHITMER CONFRONTED ON ‘WEIRD’ COVID RESTRICTIONS, SAYS SHE DID HER BEST WITH POO INFORMATION
Karen Bennett, a Democrat who represented House District 94 in Georgia, is now facing a federal charge for allegedly fraudulently obtaining COVID unemployment benefits. (Georgia House of Representatives)
«In reality, Bennett was not prevented from performing her work for Metro Therapy or reaching her place of employment because of COVID-19 quarantine,» the filing continued. «Before the pandemic, her actual role with Metro Therapy was an administrative one, and she worked from her home office; she did not provide in-home services for clients.»
«She was not prohibited from reaching her home office because of the pandemic. She was able to continue working as usual from her home to support Metro Therapy throughout the pandemic, and the therapists who provided actual services to clients were able to continue their work after a brief disruption,» it added.
Court documents show Bennett pleaded not guilty to a charge of making false statements and was issued a $10,000 bond. Lawyers representing Bennett did not immediately respond Tuesday to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.
«I am proud of the work accomplished by the Georgia General Assembly when we came together to advance policies that strengthened our state and improved the lives of all Georgians,» Bennett wrote in the letter announcing her retirement, which was obtained by FOX 5 Atlanta. «Serving in this capacity has truly been a labor of love, and one I will deeply miss.»
Bennett used to represent a district that included parts of DeKalb and Gwinnett counties.
CDC PANEL SUPPORTS ‘INDIVIDUAL DECISION-MAKING’ ON COVID VACCINES

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp is seen during the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 17, 2024. Rep. Bennett wrote a letter to Kemp on Dec. 30 announcing her retirement, but did not give a reason in the letter as to why. (Stefan Wermuth/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
In the charging document, prosecutors said Bennett applied for and was denied Unemployment Insurance benefits, which paved the way for her to file the PUA application.
In that application, Bennett also claimed in relation to her position at Metro Therapy that she was last able to work on April 10, 2020, and she was «unable to reach my place of employment because of a quarantine imposed as a direct result of the COVID-19 public health emergency,» prosecutors alleged.
«Once approved for PUA benefits, Bennett periodically submitted online certifications for every week for which she requested benefits. In each of those certifications, while she stated that she was receiving $300 per week from the General Assembly, she disclosed no other income,» the filing said, noting that Bennett claimed she was actively seeking other work.
«She submitted such certifications for weeks in March through August 2020. However, in reality, Bennett was not actively seeking work, Bennett was not prevented from working for Metro Therapy because of a COVID-19 quarantine, and Metro Therapy was still operating and receiving income,» the document said.
It added that, «Bennett failed to disclose and concealed that she had separate employment through a church and was receiving a paycheck from the church for $905 every week the entire time she was claiming PUA benefits.»

An aerial view of the Georgia State Capitol building. (Joe Sohm/Visions of America/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The Justice Department recently filed charges against Rep. Sharon Henderson, another Georgia state Democrat, on similar charges.
georgia,democratic party,crime world,coronavirus,southeast,politics
INTERNACIONAL
El ala militar chavista se alinea con Delcy Rodríguez, pero pone condiciones para garantizar la gobernabilidad

La cohesión militar detrás del chavismo duro luce a simple vista intacta tres días después del ataque a Venezuela y la captura de Nicolás Maduro.
Al menos no hay fisuras visibles en el rígido control del ministro de Defensa, Vladimir Padrino López, una figura histórica del ala militar del chavismo y que mantiene su cargo desde 2014, momento de la asunción del líder capturado.
Leé también: Tras la captura de Maduro, la oposición venezolana se reorganiza mientras Corina Machado se aferra a Trump
“Hasta ahora, parece que las Fuerzas Armadas se mantienen unidas. No hay evidencia de una división», aseguró en un informe el analista Phil Gunson, especialista del área de Los Andes del Crisis Group, una ONG dedicada a la resolución de conflictos.
Padrino López no está solo. Lo secunda el ministro del Interior y Justicia, Diosdado Cabello, también militar y a cargo del aparato represivo del chavismo.
Ambos, por cuya captura el Departamento de Estado ofrece 15 y 25 millones de dólares, respectivamente, son el símbolo de la nueva paradoja que dominará al flamante gobierno de la presidenta Delcy Rodríguez. Por un lado, entregan un respaldo fundamental para la sobrevivencia del chavismo, pero por el otro condicionarán el camino a cualquier tipo de transición que intente negociar la mandataria con el gobierno de Donald Trump.
Apoyo, pero bajo ciertas condiciones
El nuevo chavismo post-Maduro intenta dar una imagen de unidad y cohesión en torno a un discurso de combate y defensa de su líder preso en Nueva York. El folclore ideológico no ha variado. Necesita mostrarse cohesionado y beligerante frente a sus bases.
Pero la realidad es distinta. El enorme poder de los hermanos Rodríguez, la presidenta Delcy y el titular de la Asamblea Nacional (Parlamento), Jorge, preocupa al ala militar encarnada por Padrino y Cabello. Es una lucha de larga data en la interna chavista.
Delcy y Jorge Rodríguez, las nuevas caras del chavismo (Foto: AFP)
Las dos alas, la política y la militar, se necesitan una a la otra para sobrevivir. La pata civil tiene hoy el poder, debilitado y condicionado por Trump. El sector militar no tiene otra opción que respaldar a la nueva presidenta, aunque ya le puso algunas trabas en el camino. Sabe que, sin su respaldo, Delcy Rodríguez no durará mucho.
Una de las primeras medidas de Delcy Rodríguez tras jurar el lunes el cargo fue nombrar a Gustavo González López como comandante de la Guardia de Honor, su custodia personal, el anillo de seguridad diezmado por el ataque estadounidense del sábado.
Leé también: La muerte de 32 cubanos en la captura de Maduro reveló la masiva presencia de agentes de la isla en Venezuela
No es un nombre más. Es la mano derecha de Diosdado Cabello. Algunos analistas ven en este nombramiento una imposición militar con un fuerte mensaje político de impunidad y desafío. “En esta lucha por cuotas de poder, González López es una ficha de Diosdado. El mensaje es que Diosdado va a tener el monitoreo de las actividades de la presidenta”, dijo a TN un analista venezolano que pidió preservar su nombre. Diosdado Cabello y Vladimir Padrino respaldan a Delcy Rodríguez, pero con condiciones (Foto: REUTERS/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria)
En círculos políticos venezolanos llamó también la atención el arresto masivo de al menos 14 periodistas el lunes durante la jura de Delcy Rodríguez. No se observa hoy una ola de represión, según dijeron a TN activistas de derechos humanos, más allá de la movilización de fuerzas de seguridad y varias alcabalas en puntos estratégicos de Caracas.
“En este escenario, estas detenciones de periodistas llaman la atención. Algo así lo tiene que haber ordenado alguien ajeno a los hermanos Rodríguez porque esto les da mala prensa. Podemos estar en presencia de pequeños sabotajes que hacen quedar mal al nuevo gobierno. Los hermanos Rodríguez son muy inteligentes como para ordenar una detención masiva de periodistas en el recinto de la Asamblea” en el momento de la jura, dijo un analista que también pidió mantener el anonimato.
Por qué se mantiene cohesionado el poder militar
El férreo control del chavismo sobre el aparato militar se construyó a lo largo de los últimos 26 años de gobierno.
En el modelo cubano, el expresidente e histórico ministro de las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias (FAR) Raúl Castro, les entregó a los militares el control de millonarias empresas estatales que garantizaron un buen pasar a sus líderes y mandos intermedios.
El chavismo copió ese modelo, pero el fenómeno del narcotráfico y todo tipo de negocios turbios se enquistaron en sus estructuras de mando y le añadió un costado criminal que Trump utlizó como excusa para acusar a Maduro de ser el líder de un llamado Cartel de los Soles del que muchos analistas dudan de la existencia.
Leé también: El dramático relato de los familiares de los presos políticos en Venezuela: “El trato es inhumano”
La mayoría de los altos mandos militares venezolanos están hoy bajo acusación de Estados Unidos. En ese marco, el único camino que visualizan para su futuro es encolumnarse detrás de Padrino López y, al menos por ahora, de la nueva presidenta.
El ejército es la única fuerza capaz de hacer un cambio radical en Venezuela, más allá del garrote de Trump. Pero también puede decidir agruparse, deshacerse de Delcy Rodríguez y enfrentar la amenaza estadounidense.
“La cuestión clave es si las Fuerzas Armadas se mantienen unidas en apoyo al gobierno. Si lo hacen, tendremos paz, básicamente una paz antidemocrática, pero al menos evitaremos el riesgo de una guerra civil o algún tipo de convulsión interna prolongada, potencialmente una guerra prolongada de baja intensidad”, dijo Gunson en su informe.
Además, el experto afirmó: “Una división en las Fuerzas Armadas sería el escenario más peligroso. Creo que Trump ha concluido, y su entorno también, que sin el apoyo de los militares, sin un acuerdo con los militares en Venezuela, el país es ingobernable. Y María Corina Machado no puede garantizar eso”.
Venezuela, Delcy Rodriguez, Donald Trump
CHIMENTOS2 días agoLuis Ventura reveló los motivos detrás de la pelea de Juana Repetto y su hermano Bautista Lena: “Esto viene de crianzas y culturas diferentes”, analizó
CHIMENTOS3 días agoEl inesperado acercamiento de Wanda Nara a un ex de la China Suárez que desató un escándalo: “El like a Rusherking que nadie esperaba”
INTERNACIONAL1 día ago‘Nos están invadiendo’: El ataque de EE.UU. visto desde los celulares de venezolanos



































