Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Winsome Sears blasts Virginia Dems’ surprise redistricting session as a ‘stunt’ to pull her off the trail

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Virginia Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears lambasted Virginia Democrats after they signaled a plan to suddenly call the legislature back in a last-minute special session to address potential redistricting before the election.

Advertisement

Virginia’s state redistricting commission is statutorily charged with crafting new congressional maps after every decennial census, but state Democrats appear poised to try to do an end-round around that process, potentially via the constitutional amendment process.

«In a desperate political stunt, Democrats in the Virginia General Assembly are calling for a special session to drag Lieutenant Governor Winsome Earle-Sears off the campaign trail,» the Earle-Sears campaign said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

NEW POLL IN KEY SHOWDOWN FOR VIRGINIA GOVERNOR INDICATES SINGLE-DIGIT RACE

Advertisement

As lieutenant governor, Earle-Sears is the presiding officer over the otherwise Democratic-majority state Senate.

«The same politicians who marched in ‘No Kings’ protests are now trying to crown themselves as the rulers of Virginia politics, abusing their offices to rig the calendar because they can’t win on ideas,» the campaign said.

Earle-Sears spokesperson Peyton Vogel said the activity is «what panic looks like» for a party that is out of fresh ideas and is relying on such «stunts,» and suggested Democratic challenger Abigail Spanberger – a former congresswoman – was in some way involved in the plan.

Advertisement

«[S]he’s leading the charge on cheap political stunts to slow down Winsome Earle-Sears’ momentum. It’s pathetic. Voters see through it. They know Winsome Earle-Sears is a Marine, a mom, and a fighter for Virginia every day — while Abigail Spanberger is a career politician using Washington-style dirty tricks to protect her power and her friends,» Vogel said.

EARLE-SEARS COMES OUT SWINGING IN HEATED DEBATE AS SPANBERGER DODGES JAY JONES QUESTIONS

A Suffolk University poll released Thursday showed Earle-Sears trailing Spanberger by about eight percentage points, while her downballot-mates John Reid and Jason Miyares were either tied or just ahead of their Democratic opponents.

Advertisement

Democrats are hoping to expand their two-seat majority in the House of Delegates, targeting several districts in the suburbs and exurbs of Hampton Roads and Washington, D.C., where Republicans sit on a statistical knife’s edge. No state Senate seats are up until 2027. The upper chamber also has a two-seat Democratic majority.

House Speaker Don Scott Jr., D-Portsmouth, and Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell, D-Mount Vernon, did not respond to requests for comment. However, Surovell told the New York Times that plans to reconvene the legislature in Richmond next week are intended to counter President Donald Trump’s push to pressure Republican-led states on redistricting.

Those states, like Texas, see their efforts as blunting California Democrats’ likely-successful shoehorning of a mid-decade redistricting plan through Sacramento.

Advertisement

VIRGINIA VOTERS SUE TO BOOT DEMOCRAT OFF BALLOT IN DISTRICT THAT COULD DECIDE STATE HOUSE MAJORITY

«We are coming back to address actions by the Trump administration,» Surovell told the Times.

On the federal level, Democrats hold six of the 11 House seats in Virginia. Some of those held by Republicans are often considered «swing» seats that volley back and forth regularly – like that of Rep. Jennifer Kiggans in Cape Charles and Hampton Roads.

Advertisement

Loudoun County – once reliably Republican – has trended far to the left in the past decade, and there is no longer any Republican congressperson within about 50 miles of Washington.

Rep. Yevgeny «Eugene» Vindman, D-Va., twin brother of Alexander Vindman, holds a once-swing district in Prince William County and the D.C. exurbs that has been another long-term loss for the GOP.

WINSOME EARLE-SEARS REBUKES SPANBERGER PLAN TO UNDO VIRGINIA’S ICE PACT: ‘THIS IS NOT HARD’

Advertisement

The Virginia State Capitol in Richmond. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

By contrast, Rep. Morgan Griffith’s, R-Va., district in the far southwestern end of Virginia is solidly Republican. The way neighboring Rep. Ben Cline’s district is drawn – hugging Interstate 81 and the Blue Ridge Mountains – also remains so.

But Cline’s district could be one targeted by Democrats’ redraw – as slicing up the slender district and the top of Republican John McGuire’s confines and affixing the pieces to the increasingly blue center of the state could create several new seats designed in Democrats’ favor.

Advertisement

Toying with the shapes of other districts like Vindman’s along I-95 and Republican Rep. Rob Wittman in the Northern Neck could also bear fruit for Democrats.

Democrats were the ones to primarily spearhead the original constitutional amendment in 2020 that birthed the commission they now want to circumvent, as it had been introduced by then-Sen. George Barker of Fairfax. Some Republicans were listed as co-signers for the resolution as well.

SPANBERGER DEFENDS ABORTION AD CRITICIZING SEARS AFTER BERNIE WARNS AGAINST HIGHLIGHTING ISSUE

Advertisement

The amendment was later approved by about two-thirds of Virginia voters, according to reports.

If they go the constitutional amendment route, passage before November’s election would count as one session, so Democrats – betting on holding or increasing their numbers in the legislature – would have to pass it once more in the 2026 session before it made the ballot after passage.

Whether Earle-Sears or Spanberger wins, the governor is constitutionally precluded from intervening in the process.

Advertisement

Working through the regular legislative process would, by contrast, allow a governor to intervene; with the outgoing Youngkin primed to veto their initial attempt.

Pennsylvania Republicans led by 2022 gubernatorial nominee Doug Mastriano enlisted the same process to circumvent then-Gov. Tom Wolf and end his onerous coronavirus lockdown orders, so the process has seen recent success.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

The Virginia amendment would not likely create a new map, but instead authorize a new process to commence redistricting outside the current system with the decennial commission.

Fox News Digital reached out to Spanberger for comment on Earle-Sears’ claim.

Advertisement

virginia governor race,virginia,elections,elections state and local

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

En Gran Bretaña, los drones transportan contrabando a las cárceles «como si fuera Uber Eats»

Published

on



LONDRES — Poco antes de las 3 de la madrugada, el sedán se detuvo en una calle residencial de Londres.

En las imágenes de vigilancia que se utilizaron posteriormente en el juicio, se puede ver a un hombre saliendo del vehículo y recogiendo un objeto en el suelo.

Advertisement

Instantes después, el objeto —un dron— se eleva en el aire y desaparece.

El lugar se encontraba justo a las afueras del perímetro de una de las prisiones más grandes de Gran Bretaña, Wormwood Scrubs, y el dron transportaba contrabando ilegal para los reclusos.

El hombre que manejaba el dron aquella mañana de diciembre de 2024 era Shafaghatullah Mohseni, de 29 años, quien posteriormente fue condenado por ser el líder de una banda que realizó aproximadamente 140 vuelos ilegales a nueve prisiones en Inglaterra entre diciembre de 2024 y su arresto en febrero de 2025.

Advertisement

Según los fiscales, Mohseni recibió casi 27.000 libras esterlinas, unos 36.000 dólares, de los reclusos, sus amigos y familiares, a cambio de suministrar drogas, teléfonos, cargadores, tabaco y cuchillos.

Tráfico

Advertisement

Según cifras del gobierno, esta lucrativa actividad representaba solo una pequeña fracción de los drones enviados a las prisiones británicas en los últimos años, transportando contrabando que, según los directores de prisiones, está provocando un aumento de la violencia y el consumo de drogas.

La eficacia del contrabando es tal que los presos están encargando productos como inyecciones para adelgazar, así como artículos muy codiciados como teléfonos y armas, según Tom Wheatley, presidente de la Asociación de Directores de Prisiones de Gran Bretaña.

«Introducen todo tipo de cosas», declaró en una entrevista.

Advertisement

«Cualquier cosa que tenga valor en la cárcel, que alguien dentro quiera y que no puedan conseguir por medios legales».

El juez James Lofthouse, quien sentenció a Mohseni a principios de marzo a cinco años y tres meses de prisión, dijo que los paquetes ilegales habían estado llegando dentro de los muros de la prisión «francamente, como si fueran de Uber Eats».

El número de avistamientos de drones registrados en prisiones de Inglaterra y Gales ha aumentado drásticamente desde que se detectaron los primeros vuelos en 2014, alcanzando un récord de 1712 en el año que finalizó en marzo de 2025, según cifras del gobierno británico.

Advertisement

Los expertos señalan que es probable que esta cifra sea una subestimación, ya que las normas de registro exigen que el personal penitenciario vea los drones personalmente, y los vuelos se realizan principalmente en plena noche, cuando el personal es menor.

«Nos han entregado machetes mediante drones», declaró Mark Fairhurst, presidente de la Asociación Británica de Funcionarios de Prisiones.

«Es solo cuestión de tiempo antes de que nos entreguen un arma de fuego o se produzca una fuga».

Advertisement

El contrabando siempre ha entrado en las cárceles, a menudo por medio de empleados o visitantes corruptos.

En el pasado, a veces se lanzaban paquetes, conocidos como «lanzamientos por encima de los muros y vallas», por encima de las paredes de la prisión.

Fairhurst, que se convirtió en funcionario de prisiones en 1992, recordó intentos espeluznantes de ocultar objetos, como el lanzamiento de palomas muertas llenas de drogas.

Advertisement

El superintendente jefe de detectives Lewis Hughes, de la policía de Greater Manchester, quien dirigió una reciente operación antidrones en cuatro prisiones de su ciudad, declaró en una entrevista que una estratagema común consistía en esconder drogas en pelotas de tenis.

Luego, las pelotas se cubrían con cuchillas de afeitar y se lanzaban contra sábanas que los reclusos colgaban de las ventanas de sus celdas.

Hoy en día, “los drones se han convertido en el método más accesible”, afirmó Hughes.

Advertisement

Señaló que la mayoría de las prisiones británicas se construyeron décadas, o incluso siglos, antes de que se inventaran los drones, lo que significa que los edificios “son seguros desde tierra, pero no desde el aire”.

Los reclusos encargan envíos mediante teléfonos ocultos a las autoridades penitenciarias o a través de contactos dentro de la prisión, quienes transmiten las solicitudes a las bandas criminales del exterior.

Los artículos suelen ser pagados por familiares y amigos.

Advertisement

Los paquetes se enganchan a drones comerciales y se envían a un lugar previamente acordado, como un patio de ejercicios o la ventana de una celda.

Fairhurst estimó que los artículos comprados ilícitamente costaban entre cinco y diez veces su valor normal.

«Esto tiene repercusiones en las comunidades, porque con frecuencia las familias se ven amenazadas para pagar deudas contraídas internamente», afirmó.

Advertisement

Informe

Un informe publicado este año por la Oficina Nacional de Auditoría (NAO), organismo británico encargado de controlar el gasto público, reveló que la drogadicción entre los presos había aumentado, en parte como consecuencia de las entregas con drones.

«En comparación con otras vías, los drones tienen el potencial de entregar paquetes relativamente grandes de artículos ilícitos de forma muy precisa», señala el informe.

Advertisement

Asimismo, indica que las cárceles de toda Europa se enfrentan a un desafío similar.

Para evitar que los drones arrojen paquetes, se han instalado redes en algunos edificios penitenciarios y rejas de seguridad en las ventanas de las celdas.

En febrero, el gobierno británico convocó un concurso para financiar el desarrollo de tecnología que permita detener de forma segura a los drones hostiles una vez que penetren en el espacio aéreo seguro de las prisiones.

Advertisement

El gobierno también ha declarado que intentará aprender de las técnicas utilizadas para contrarrestar los drones rusos en Ucrania.

Según Hughes, la policía ha estado patrullando las zonas aledañas a las prisiones, conscientes de que estos dispositivos tienen un alcance operativo limitado.

A todos los drones encontrados se les toman muestras para obtener huellas dactilares y se les realiza un análisis forense digital para buscar metadatos sobre sus trayectorias de vuelo.

Advertisement

Una vez que un dron está en el aire, «la policía poco puede hacer», señaló Hughes.

«Tenemos que entrar en las casas de los delincuentes organizados y atrapar al piloto del dron mientras está en la cama o desayunando».

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Israel approves sweeping death penalty legislation targeting terrorism, EU condemns move

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

JERUSALEM: Israel’s Parliament, the Knesset, on Monday passed a law mandating the death penalty for Palestinian terrorists convicted of deadly acts of terrorism, sparking anger from European countries and an Israeli opposition leader.

Advertisement

Lawmakers voted 62-47 in favor of far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir’s legislation to prescribe the death penalty by hanging. Ben Gvir and his party, Otzma Yehudit, proposed the measure.

Otzma Yehudit lawmaker Tzvika Foghel, who chairs the National Security Committee and advanced the bill through the committee under his leadership, told Fox News Digital that Israelis are fed up with policies of containment and compromise.

NETANYAHU URGES COURT TO REVOKE PALESTINIANS’ ISRAELI CITIZENSHIP AFTER CONVICTIONS FOR VIOLENT CRIMES

Advertisement

The opening assembly of the Knesset’s winter session on Monday evening. (Yoav Dudkevitch/TPS-IL)

«For too many years, we have tried to please the entire world, even when we were being murdered in our streets. Since October 7, we have shifted to an offensive approach so that we can dictate the reality in the future,» he said.

Foghel said the death penalty for terrorists is part of a broader shift in Israel, driven by the recognition that no other country faces a reality in confronting radical Islamic terrorism in Gaza, Lebanon, Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), as well as in Yemen and Iran.

Advertisement

«The death penalty for terrorists who burned, raped, mutilated and abused children and parents is the same punishment we established for the Nazis,» he said.

Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, said, «The EU has a principled position against the death penalty in all cases and in all circumstances. Israel had long upheld a de facto moratorium on both executions and capital punishment sentencing, thereby leading by example in the region despite a complex security environment.»

She added, «The approval of the Death Penalty Bill by the Israeli Parliament marks a grave regression from that practice and from Israel’s own commitments. We are deeply concerned about the de facto discriminatory character of the Bill.»

Advertisement

ANALYSTS SAY GAZA ‘CIVILIAN’ DEATHS INCLUDE HAMAS, OTHER TERROR MEMBERS WORKING AS MEDICS, MEDIA WORKERS

Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid speaks at the Knesset

 Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid speaks at the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, on Oct. 13, 2025 in Jerusalem.  ((Photo by Evelyn Hockstein – Pool/Getty Images))

Israel has applied the death penalty only once in the state’s history for the Nazi mass murderer Adolf Eichmann in 1962. The death penalty exists on the books in Israel, but Israeli courts have limited latitude to apply execution to cases beyond penalties for Nazi war criminals.

Former Prime Minister and current leader of the centrist Yesh Atid party, Yair Lapid said the legislation is fundamentally flawed because it does not apply to Hamas terrorists involved in the Oct. 7, 2023 massacre that killed 1,200 people.

Advertisement

«This law is not a show of force; it is a sign of panic. This law is more extreme than anything in the United States, and they know it will get struck down by the law. It isn’t a law for justice or for deterrence, it is a law for public relations,» he added.

Adolf Eichmann trial in Israel.

Adolf Eichmann, in a bullet-proof cabin, puts on earphones to hear the reading of the act of accusation against him, Dec. 17, 1961. He was in charge of the extermination of Jews in Poland and then organized the deportation and extermination of Jews in 13 European countries. (Keystone-France/Gamma-Keystone via Getty Images)

Likud lawmaker Dan Illouz, a supporter of the legislation, told Fox News Digital that the events of Oct. 7 underscored, in his view, the need to prevent terrorists from viewing the kidnapping of civilians as a viable means of securing the release of imprisoned militants.

«The death penalty shatters that equation. It serves as the ultimate deterrent, ensuring that terrorists know their actions lead only to their own demise, not a negotiated release. We are a life-loving nation, but to protect life, we must deal decisively with those who seek to destroy it,» he said.

Advertisement

«Prime Minister Netanyahu’s vote in favor was crucial. It projects an unmistakable message of strength and moral clarity from the very top of Israel’s leadership. By personally casting his vote, the Prime Minister showed our enemies, and the entire world, that our government is completely united and unyielding in our resolve to eradicate terrorism and defend our citizens,» he added.

MICHIGAN SYNAGOGUE ATTACKER WAS INSPIRED BY HEZBOLLAH, SOUGHT TO KILL AS MANY JEWISH PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE: FEDS

The Israeli Channel 12 political commentator, Amit Segal, wrote that he supports «executing terrorists who attempt to murder civilians — especially the monsters of October 7,» but was critical of Ben Gvir’s legislation.

Advertisement

He wrote in his newsletter, «The law defines terrorism as acts ‘to negate the existence of the state,’ a definition that could apply to groups such as extremist Haredi factions and violent members of the ‘Hilltop Youth’ (which Ben-Gvir supports.)

Hamas terror attacks

Hamas terrorists killed civilians, including women, children and the elderly, when they attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.  (Israel Defense Forces via AP)

Segal said that «while Ben-Gvir’s law is essentially a campaign stunt, a more responsible law is making its way through the system. Proposed by MKs Simcha Rotman and Yulia Malinovsky, the law establishes the practical mechanisms — procedural and evidentiary — to secure convictions of Nukhba terrorists, after which the death penalty could be imposed.»

Another Likud lawmaker, Amit Halevi, told Fox News Digital that the central element of the legislation is the distinction between criminal offenses and crimes against the state or against humanity.

Advertisement

«A terrorist commits his crimes as part of an ideology aimed at killing, oppressing and controlling all Jews. These terrorists, if they could, would kill every one of us. They are ideological murderers, in a different category from ordinary criminals, and that is a critical point of the bill,» he said.

Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir

Israel’s National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir arrives for a cabinet meeting at the prime minister’s office in Jerusalem on Aug. 27, 2023. (MENAHEM KAHANA/Pool via REUTERS)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Halevi added that further efforts are needed to clearly delineate crimes against the state, including what falls within that category and what does not.

Advertisement

«Generally speaking, this legislation is a step in the right direction. Much of the criticism I hear relates to ordinary criminals. People do not understand the enemy — who he is and what this war is about,» he said.



israel, terrorism, hamas, conflicts, benjamin netanyahu

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Sanders-backed NJ Dem accused of hiding from voters as skipped forums pile up

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A progressive House candidate backed by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., is under fire for dodging in-person debates with her GOP opponent ahead of an April special election, prompting accusations that she is reluctant to defend her far-left platform before voters.

Advertisement

Republican candidate Joe Hathaway is ripping his Democratic opponent, Analilia Mejia, for agreeing to a virtual debate — after repeatedly declining a series of face-to-face opportunities. The candidates are scheduled to participate in a live virtual forum sponsored by the New Jersey Globe on Wednesday evening. 

«Unfortunately, when my opponent dodges and lies about debates, it limits the opportunity for a head-to-head matchup with two weeks left in the election,» Hathaway said in a statement to Fox News Digital. «For now, she can hide behind a screen, but she cannot hide from her record.»

The special election winner will fill an open seat vacated by Gov. Mikie Sherrill, D-N.J., who resigned after winning the state’s 2025 governor’s race. The outcome will be closely watched for its potential impact on House Republicans’ razor-thin majority.

Advertisement

Analilia Mejia, then a progressive activist, speaks during a news conference outside the U.S. Capitol on April 19, 2023, in Washington, D.C. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

WHERE SANDERS AND AOC BACKED PROGRESSIVE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE ANALILIA MEJIA STANDS ON KEY ISSUES

Hathaway’s blistering criticism comes after Mejia repeatedly declined debate opportunities with Hathaway that he accepted, the Hathaway campaign told Fox News Digital. 

Advertisement

Proposed debates sponsored by Montclair High School, On New Jersey, Fairleigh Dickinson University and New Jersey Spotlight News ultimately fell through after Mejia did not accept the invites, according to the Hathaway campaign.

Mejia, who narrowly upset a crowded field of challengers in February’s Democratic primary, has also faced backlash for appearing to misrepresent her rationale for backing out of a separate debate opportunity with local chapters of the left-leaning League of Women Voters. 

The New Jersey Democrat said she rejected the debate invite — co-sponsored by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New Jersey — because the group was «unable to commit» to having a person of color as the moderator.

Advertisement

The woman-led group fired back in a statement accusing Mejia of lying, saying their intended moderator would have been a person of color. Mejia’s primary objection was not being able to control the selection process herself, according to the group.

Split image of Joe Hathaway and Analilia Mejia

Republican candidate Joe Hathaway has sharply criticized Democrat Analilia Mejia for dodging an in-person debate opportunity ahead of the April 16 special election. (Joe Hathaway Campaign; Heather Khalifa/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

BALLOT BOX SHOCKER: PROGRESSIVE BACKED BY SANDERS, AOC ON VERGE OF UPSET IN DEM CONGRESSIONAL PRIMARY

«We were asked to provide a campaign with a list of potential moderators for approval,» Jennifer Howard, LWV president, said in a release. «This is a request that the League of Women Voters cannot accommodate. Our nonpartisan stance does not permit a candidate to influence the selection of the moderator.»

Advertisement

Hathaway, a Randolph Township councilmember who faces an uphill battle to win the Democratic-leaning district, slammed Mejia for backing out of the planned debate.

«If she is willing to lie about something as simple as a debate, what other lies can we expect to hear from her tomorrow?» Hathaway told Fox News Digital.

«We will show a clear contrast between the practical common-sense leadership that I am running on, and the dangerous, radical, and socialist policies of my opponent,» he added.

Advertisement

When asked to comment on Monday, a spokesperson for the Mejia campaign said, «All Joe Hathaway does is complain. We will see him tomorrow.»

Abolish ICE protest sign

Analilia Mejia has embraced the «Abolish ICE» movement during her run for Congress. (Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The Mejia campaign previously told Fox News Digital that she accepted the New Jersey Globe debate because the outlet met her diversity requirements and was closely following the race.

Advertisement

Mejia, a staunch progressive who served in a senior role in Sanders’ 2020 presidential campaign, has called for the abolition of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and is a vocal critic of Israel. 

The winner of the special election will face voters again in November for a full two-year term.

democrats elections, new jersey, alexandria ocasio cortez, house of representatives, politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias