INTERNACIONAL
Margaret Atwood reveló cómo la dictadura argentina influyó en “El cuento de la criada”

Margaret Atwood admitió cómo la dictadura argentina de los pasados años setenta, con la desaparición de miles de personas y el robo de bebés, supuso en parte una “influencia muy importante” a la hora de escribir El cuento de la criada, la novela distópica más famosa de la escritora canadiense.

El cuento de la criada
eBook
Con motivo de la publicación este mes de sus memorias –Libro de mis vidas– Atwood, que está a punto de cumplir 86 años, habló en un encuentro con la prensa en Londres de los generales argentinos y de las dictaduras en general, así como de la guerra de Troya, para referirse a eventos que marcaron su inspiración literaria.
“La dictadura argentina, particularmente su costumbre de quitarles los bebés a las personas asesinadas y entregárselos a generales o a sus familias, es decir, a las élites de la época. Esto derivó en que los niños crecieran y descubrieran que sus padres (adoptivos) habían asesinado a sus padres”, recalca Atwood, cuyos libros están traducidos a más de 40 idiomas.
Pero los generales argentinos no fueron los únicos, resaltó: “Hitler, por ejemplo, robó bebés polacos rubios, con la esperanza de que se convirtieran en bebés alemanes rubios. Los rusos han robado muchos niños ucranianos. No sabemos dónde están”, afirmó la autora.
Insistió en que el robo de bebés ha sido una tema recurrente “en la historia de la humanidad. Pensemos en la guerra de Troya”, que “arrojaron a todos los bebés varones por un precipicio”.
“Sí, un tema recurrente, no solo en Argentina, pero para mí, que lo viví, fue influyente”, resaltó Atwood, cuyo último libro narra episodios de su infancia en los bosques del norte de Quebec hasta detalles sobre sus obras, sus vínculos familiares y cómo la experiencia cotidiana se transforma en literatura.
‘El cuento de la criada» está ambientada en un futuro distópico en la República de Gilead, que es una teocracia totalitaria surgida tras un golpe de estado en EE.UU. donde la infertilidad, muy extendida, ha llevado al sometimiento de las mujeres fértiles en una especie de esclavitud.
Con una trayectoria marcada por un fuerte compromiso social y la defensa de los derechos de las mujeres, Atwood habló hoy sobre temas recurrentes, como el cambio climático o el impacto de la inteligencia artificial (AI), del que, dijo, es ya “parte de nuestra cultura”.

La situación del cambio climático “podría empeorar mucho” y “una vez que se produce un cambio así, afectará la vida de todos en el planeta”, mientras el presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, está “arrasando” los avances logrados en este sentido para contenerlo.
“Así que tenemos una tormenta perfecta: cambio climático, mucha contaminación tóxica, una tasa de natalidad que está disminuyendo por varias razones. Y tenemos una generación joven mucho más preocupada por su futuro que la gente de mi generación”, consideró Atwood.
La gente de su época, argumenta, no pensaba que podía quedarse sin trabajo, ni tenían preocupaciones como las que tienen hoy los jóvenes, afirma. “Así que sí, creo que estamos atravesando una época difícil.¿Tiene la humanidad la capacidad y la inteligencia para superarla? Teóricamente, sí. ¿Lo logrará? No lo sabemos”.
Cuando la gente está muy preocupada por la comida, las facturas y si tendrá dónde vivir, “no podemos lograr que se concentren en algo tan abstracto. Así que hay un incendio forestal aquí, una ola de calor allá”, así que “mientras no te afecte (…) sientes que no puedes hacer nada al respecto”.
Sobre la IA, Atwood admitió que ya es parte de la vida de la gente, con jóvenes que la utilizan para redactar ensayos en sus estudios, pero avisó que no todo el mundo “abraza” esta nueva tecnología porque no hay garantías de que diga la verdad.
A lo largo de sus memorias, la escritora reflexiona sobre el oficio de escribir y sobre la capacidad de la literatura para interpretar la realidad, siempre con ironía y una gran curiosidad.
Fuente: EFE
INTERNACIONAL
EU blocks US vote to define gender as biological men and women at UN women’s forum

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The United States stood alone at the United Nations in early March after a European-led procedural move blocked a vote on defining gender in biological terms at one of the world’s leading forums on women’s rights.
At the conclusion of the U.N. Commission on the Status of Women, the U.S. was the only country to oppose the body’s annual «Agreed Conclusions,» citing concerns that the language departs from biological definitions of women and girls. No other member state voted with the United States.
At the center of the dispute is how the United Nations defines «gender.» Current U.N. frameworks, rooted in the 1995 Beijing Declaration, do not provide a fixed definition and instead rely on evolving interpretations tied to broader concepts of gender identity, according to EU officials.
The U.S. proposal sought to anchor the term explicitly in biological sex.
UPROAR AFTER IRAN NAMED VICE-CHAIR OF UN BODY PROMOTING DEMOCRACY, WOMEN’S RIGHTS
The U.S. introduced a resolution titled «Protection of women and girls through appropriate terminology,» which sought to clarify how gender is understood across U.N. policy.
The «Violence Against Women and Girls» meeting, part of the 70th session of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women in New York, on March 12, 2026. (Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images)
The draft states that the term «gender» should be interpreted «according to its ordinary, generally accepted usage, as referring to men and women.»
The proposal never reached a vote. Belgium, speaking on behalf of the European Union, introduced a «no action motion,» a procedural tool that blocks debate and prevents a proposal from being considered.
The motion passed, halting the U.S. resolution before it reached the floor.
That distinction carries practical implications. U.N. language shapes global standards tied to development funding, humanitarian programs, education policy and anti-discrimination frameworks.
Bethany Kozma, director of global affairs at the Department of Health and Human Services, told Fox News Digital the move reflects a broader effort to shut down debate at the U.N.
STATE DEPT MOVES TO EXPAND MEXICO CITY POLICY, TARGETING ABORTION, DEI AND GENDER IDEOLOGY IN FOREIGN AID

The Belgian flag is photographed in Antwerp, Belgium, on May 17, 2015. (Photo by Michael Jacobs/Art in All of Us/Corbis via Getty Images)
«While our redlines were ignored, the United States Government will not stand by and watch as malicious forces misuse multilateral organizations to promote their ideologies and social agendas, obstructing nations’ abilities to exercise their national sovereignty,» Kozma said. «We will always protect women and girls from dangerous gender ideology and affirm biological truth.»
She added that the decision to block the vote was driven by political calculation.
«The EU blocked our resolution to define gender to mean men and women at the U.N. because they feared we would win and they would lose,» Kozma said. «We will not give up on doing what is right for women and girls. Even if we stand alone like we did at the U.N. last week, we will always stand to protect women and girls from dangerous radical gender ideology and always affirm biological truth.»
STATE DEPARTMENT DECLARES ‘INTERNATIONAL BUREAUCRACIES’ WILL NO LONGER GET ‘BLANK CHECKS’ FROM THE US

Delegates attend a United Nations Security Council meeting on Feb. 24, 2026, in New York City. (John Lamparski/Getty Images)
A State Department official, speaking on background, described the move as part of a broader coordinated effort led by European countries.
«These are procedural games that these countries are not prepared for,» the official said, referring to smaller delegations that may lack guidance on complex procedural votes.
The official said the maneuver allowed opponents to block a vote despite what the U.S. believed was growing support. These claims could not be independently verified.
The European Union rejected the U.S. criticism, saying the proposal was flawed and rushed.
«The draft resolution presented by the U.S. was factually incorrect,» said David Jordens, spokesperson for Belgium’s foreign ministry, adding that it «misquotes and contradicts» language agreed to in the 1995 Beijing Declaration.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The United Nations in New York City. (iStock)
«While the EU respects member states’ prerogative to put forward new initiatives for consideration, CSW members should not be forced to rush a decision on an issue of this importance by the unilateral initiative of one member state, without any prior consultations or negotiations,» Jordens said.
He added that «there is no universally agreed definition of the term ‘gender’. As reflected in the outcome of the Fourth World Conference on Women, the term was understood in accordance with its ordinary and generally accepted usage, without establishing a fixed or exhaustive definition. The United Nations should continue to approach gender equality in an inclusive and forward-looking manner, respectful of diversity. Any effort to revisit or reinterpret internationally agreed language must take place through broad, transparent consultations with the full membership.»
united nations, womens health, state department, the european union
INTERNACIONAL
GOP candidate warns Bernie-backed Dem rival’s green ties could hit farms, energy

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A Democratic candidate in a key Wisconsin battleground is highlighting support from a major environmental group as her Republican opponent warns the endorsement could drive up energy costs and hurt farmers.
Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis., blasted Democratic challenger Rebecca Cooke’s endorsement by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Action Fund, arguing it signals policies that could raise costs for farmers and rural communities.
«Rebecca Cooke is completely out of touch with Wisconsin, touting an endorsement from the radical NRDC,» Van Orden told Fox News Digital. «It’s a clear sign of how quickly she’ll sell out Wisconsin farm families to please Washington Democrats.»
«Farmers and businesses across Wisconsin have time and again rejected the radical Green New Deal because it would increase the price of fertilizer, diesel and cover up more of our black dirt with solar wastelands,» he said.
REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: GOP TARGETS AFFORDABILITY WITH RECONCILIATION 2.0 PLAN AHEAD OF MIDTERMS
The clash underscores how energy costs and their impact on Wisconsin’s farm economy are emerging as a central fault line in one of the most competitive House races in the country, where control of the chamber could hinge on battleground districts like the 3rd.
Cooke, who is challenging Van Orden in Wisconsin’s 3rd Congressional District, recently touted the NRDC Action Fund endorsement.
«Growing up on a dairy farm I know how important it is to be steward to the land, I want to protect Western Wisconsin’s natural resources and ensure the next generation has clean air and clean water,» Cooke wrote following the endorsement. «Investing in clean energy will create good-paying local jobs and help lower costs for working families. I’ll work with anyone to strengthen our economy and help strengthen our community.»
Jed Ober, managing director of the Natural Resources Defense Council Action Fund, said the group is «proud to support her campaign for Congress,» adding that Cooke «will be a champion for working families who are worried about rising energy costs.»
The Natural Resources Defense Council Action Fund is the political arm of the environmental advocacy group focused on climate and conservation issues.
A Democratic candidate in a key Wisconsin battleground is highlighting support from a major environmental group as her Republican opponent warns the endorsement could drive up energy costs and hurt farmers. (Kayla Wolf/Getty Images)
Van Orden criticized Cooke’s embrace of the endorsement, telling Fox News Digital, «Rebecca Cooke is completely out of touch with Wisconsin, touting an endorsement from the radical NRDC. It’s a clear sign of how quickly she’ll sell out Wisconsin farm families to please Washington Democrats.»
DEMOCRATS NAME CANDIDATES TO ‘RED TO BLUE’ INITIATIVE, AIMING TO FLIP GOP MAJORITY DURING MIDTERMS
«Farmers and businesses across Wisconsin have time and again rejected the radical Green New Deal because it would increase the price of fertilizer, diesel, and cover up more of our black dirt with solar wastelands.»
«Energy prices are out of control in western Wisconsin because of Derrick Van Orden’s failed leadership. He voted to increase electricity costs while handing out tax breaks to the ultra-rich,» Cooke responded in a statement to Fox News Digital. «He’s cheerleading a war of choice in the Middle East that sent the prices of gas and diesel skyrocketing in less than a month. It’s hurting our farmers who have already been hit hard by the tariffs Van Orden has supported every step of the way.»
The Natural Resources Defense Council has backed efforts to curb fossil fuel production, including supporting restrictions on hydraulic fracturing and praising the Biden administration’s pause on new liquefied natural gas (LNG) export approvals.
Republicans and industry groups argue those kinds of policies can raise energy costs in states like Wisconsin, where agriculture and fuel prices are closely linked.
Diesel powers much of the nation’s farm equipment, while fertilizer production is closely tied to natural gas — making energy prices a key concern for farmers.
Democrats argue that investments in clean energy can benefit rural communities through job creation and lower utility costs over time.

Rebecca Cooke, who is challenging Rep. Derrick Van Orden in Wisconsin’s 3rd Congressional District, recently touted an endorsement from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Action Fund. (Provided by the office of Congressman Derrick Van Orden)
While Wisconsin does not have significant hydraulic fracturing operations, it plays a major role in the industry as a leading producer of silica sand used in fracking nationwide, meaning changes in domestic energy production can affect parts of the state’s economy.
The Natural Resources Defense Council also has opposed projects like the Enbridge Line 5 pipeline, which transports oil and natural gas liquids through the Great Lakes region. Supporters, including some industry and labor groups, say the pipeline is critical to maintaining reliable and affordable energy supplies in the Midwest, while environmental groups have raised concerns about environmental risks.
Cooke also received support from prominent Democrats, including Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.

Van Orden criticized Cooke’s embrace of the endorsement, telling Fox News Digital, «Rebecca Cooke is completely out of touch with Wisconsin, touting an endorsement from the radical NRDC. It’s a clear sign of how quickly she’ll sell out Wisconsin farm families to please Washington Democrats. (iStock)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The race between Cooke and Van Orden is expected to be highly competitive, with both parties viewing Wisconsin’s 3rd District as a key battleground that could help determine control of the House.
With control of the chamber at stake, energy costs and their impact on Wisconsin’s farm economy are poised to be a central fault line in the race.
wisconsin, energy, campaigning, house of representatives politics
INTERNACIONAL
Vulnerable pero vital: el oleoducto saudí que actúa como único pulmón del mercado petrolero

POLITICA3 días ago¿FIN DE CICLO? Escándalo por la mansión no declarada y viajes de lujo empujan a Manuel Adorni fuera del Gobierno: Su salida sería inminente
POLITICA1 día ago»¡VAN A FUNDIR A MEDIO PAÍS!»: El lapidario diagnóstico de Roberto Cachanosky sobre el plan de Milei
POLITICA2 días agoApareció otra factura y complica más a Adorni: el vuelo de vuelta también lo pagó su amigo Grandio













