Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Former Army captain warns Dems’ ‘unpatriotic’ video telling troops to defy orders could spark chaos

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A video featuring six Democrats telling U.S. troops to reject unlawful orders has sparked backlash, with President Donald Trump declaring it to be «seditious behavior.» 

Advertisement

Former U.S. Army Captain Doug Truax, founder of Restoration of America, told Fox News Digital the video risks undermining the military’s chain of command and increasing political tensions across the country.

«This is one of the most unpatriotic things I’ve seen in my lifetime,» Truax told Fox News Digital.

Truax argued that the undermining of the military’s chain of command would cause chaos with troops suddenly questioning orders based on morality and not legality. He said that putting the onus on service members was «not fair to them» because they are facing difficult tasks and have no interest in getting involved in political matters.

Advertisement

SIX DEMOCRATS URGE MILITARY MEMBERS TO ‘REFUSE ILLEGAL ORDERS’ IN VIRAL VIDEO; HEGSETH RESPONDS

Protesters demonstrate near members of the National Guard as they stand watch outside Union Station in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 20, 2025.  (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)

The video, which was released last week, featured Sens. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., Reps. Chris Deluzio, D-Pa., Maggie Goodlander, D-N.H., Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., and Jason Crow, D-Colo. All the lawmakers in the video have various service backgrounds, including the Army, Navy, Air Force and Central Intelligence Agency.

Advertisement

In the video, which has since gone viral, the lawmakers tell U.S. military members that they can and must reject illegal orders, something Truax said service members know. He argued that the Democrats in the video were «blurring lines.»

«You’ve got the situation where you have elected officials that are basically telling our people in uniform that if you don’t think that this is a good idea, you don’t have to do it, which, you know, they’re never required to obey illegal orders. Everybody knows that. They’re blurring lines here,» Truax said.

He added that this kind of message causes «an incredible amount of apprehension» for those on the ground who may second guess orders that are lawful. Truax also underscored the importance of the chain of command within the military, saying that without it there would be «a lot of chaos.»

Advertisement

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth expressed a similar sentiment on Tuesday, writing in a post on X, «The despicable video urging [DOW] troops to ‘refuse illegal orders’ may seem harmless to civilians — but it carries a different weight inside the military.»

«In the military, vague rhetoric and ambiguity undermines trust, creates hesitation in the chain of command and erodes cohesion. The military already has clear procedures for handling unlawful orders. It does not need political actors injecting doubt into an already clear chain of command,» Hegseth added.

,DEMOCRATIC SENATOR ‘NOT AWARE’ IF TRUMP GAVE ANY ILLEGAL MILITARY ORDERS AMID VIDEO CONTROVERSY

Advertisement

When asked about those who defend the lawmakers based on their service background, Truax said that their experience in uniform makes the video even worse.

«They should know better,» he said. «This is all about political power. I think that everybody in there. They know they’re losing political power over time here because the country is moving in a direction that’s more conservative and less chaos and less lawlessness. So, they’re trying to find ways to maintain their political power.»

Truax argued that the video is especially dangerous due to the volatile political environment, pointing to the assassination of Charlie Kirk and the near assassination of Trump. He accused the lawmakers in the video of stoking the flames of division.

Advertisement

«We’ve got a lot of political violence already. The president was almost killed. Charlie Kirk was assassinated. We just have a lot of stuff going on right now, and then you got these guys coming out and doing this. You know, I think most Americans would say this is not a good idea. We don’t need more fuel on the fire with what these guys are doing,» Truax told Fox News Digital.

He didn’t hold back in his criticism of the lawmakers, calling them a «sophisticated D.C. cocktail version of Antifa.» He said that they are trying to «fray the country further.»

DEPUTY AG BLASTS DEMOCRATS’ ‘ABHORRENT’ VIDEO URGING TROOPS TO ‘REFUSE ILLEGAL ORDERS’

Advertisement
Soldiers stand next to protester holding a sign that reads "What Trump Order Won't You Obey?"

The U.S. Capitol building is visible behind Nadine Seiler of Waldorf, Maryland, who holds a sign that reads, «What Trump Order Won’t You Obey?» as she stands next to National Guard troops outside Union Station on Aug. 20, 2025. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Despite saying the video’s message could cause chaos in the ranks, Truax said he does not think active duty service members will be impacted by the fallout. However, he thinks that the National Guard and reservists will face issues when they «find themselves in difficult situations in some city, following legal and lawful orders.»

Truax warned that the U.S. could be repeating past mistakes by politicizing the military, drawing comparison to how troops were treated after the Vietnam War. After fighting an intense war, soldiers faced immense criticism upon their return home. Truax shared an example that hit close to home. His father-in-law served in Vietnam and earned a Purple Heart before going on to serve in the Army for 20 years.

The U.S. Capitol is seen as members of the National Guard patrol the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 8, 2025. (AFP via Getty Images)

The U.S. Capitol is seen as members of the National Guard patrol the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 8, 2025. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«When he came back it wasn’t pretty. And he’s a young guy, wounded, serving his country,» Truax said. «He still thinks about it. He’s fine now, but it was a terrible time.»

He said that «nobody wants» to see soldiers sent to do difficult and dangerous tasks only to come back and find themselves being politically targeted for serving their country.

Advertisement

politics,military,army,senate,democrats senate,democrats

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Rusia y Ucrania anunciaron el canje de 350 prisioneros de guerra

Published

on


Un prisionero de guerra ucraniano (POWs) reacciona después de un intercambio, en medio del ataque de Rusia contra Ucrania, en un lugar desconocido en Ucrania, en esta foto difundida el 11 de abril de 2026. El presidente de Ucrania, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, vía Telegram/Handout via REUTERS

Rusia y Ucrania anunciaron este sábado el canje de 350 prisioneros de guerra, 175 por cada bando, con la mediación de los Emiratos Árabes Unidos.

El anuncio, hecho casi simultáneamente por el ministerio de Defensa de Rusia y por el presidente ucraniano, Volodímir Zelensky, se produjo horas antes de que comience la tregua anunciada por las partes beligerantes con ocasión de la Pascua ortodoxa.

Advertisement

“Nuestros soldados están regresando a casa. 175 militares. Soldados de las Fuerzas Armadas, guardias nacionales, guardias de fronteras. Soldados rasos, sargentos y oficiales. Y siete civiles”, escribió Zelensky en sus redes sociales.

En el caso de los combatientes rusos, como en anteriores ocasiones, estos se encuentran en territorio de Bielorrusia, donde reciben asistencia médica y psicológica, según Moscú.

Además, añade la nota castrense rusa, Kiev devolvió a siete civiles de la región fronteriza rusa de Kursk, ocupada parcialmente por el ejército ucraniano durante menos de un año.

Advertisement

Moscú agradeció a las autoridades de los Emiratos “los esfuerzos humanitarios” realizados para consumar el intercambio.

Personal de servicio ruso capturado por las fuerzas ucranianas y liberado durante el último intercambio de prisioneros de guerra en el curso del conflicto entre Rusia y Ucrania, mientras reaccionan en un autobús en un lugar desconocido en Bielorrusia, en esta imagen tomada de material de archivo difundido el 11 de abril de 2026. Ministerio de Defensa ruso/Handout via REUTERS
Personal de servicio ruso capturado por las fuerzas ucranianas y liberado durante el último intercambio de prisioneros de guerra en el curso del conflicto entre Rusia y Ucrania, mientras reaccionan en un autobús en un lugar desconocido en Bielorrusia, en esta imagen tomada de material de archivo difundido el 11 de abril de 2026. Ministerio de Defensa ruso/Handout via REUTERS

Por su parte, Zelensky indicó que los militares ucraniano liberados habían sido capturados cuando defendían a Ucrania en diversos puntos del frente, por ejemplo la ciudad costera de Mariúpol (sur), tomada por Rusia en 2022, o la central nuclear de Chernóbil, así como en las regiones de Donetsk, Lugansk, Kharkiv, Khersón, Zaporizhzhia, Sumi y Kiev y en la región rusa de Kursk.

“Entre ellos hay heridos. La mayoría han estado cautivos desde 2022. Y ahora, finalmente, en casa”, subrayó Zelensky.

El presidente agradeció su trabajo a las unidades ucranianas que capturan soldados rusos, con los que amplían las reservas de prisioneros de guerra para canjear, y señaló la importancia de recuperar a todos los ucranianos cautivos en Rusia.

Advertisement

A pocas horas de la tregua pascual

Poco antes, Zelensky había reiterado el compromiso de su país con la tregua con ocasión de la Pascua ortodoxa que está previsto que comience en pocas horas con Rusia y advirtió de una respuesta “simétrica” en caso de que el enemigo infrinja el alto el fuego.

Además, insistió en que Ucrania está dispuesta a prolongar la tregua de dos días, a pesar de que el viernes Moscú volviera a rechazar esta posibilidad y justificara el alto el fuego temporal con la Pascua ortodoxa y con su “carácter humanitario”.

Prisioneros de guerra ucranianos tras un intercambio, en medio del ataque ruso contra Ucrania, en un lugar desconocido de Ucrania, según esta fotografía distribuida el 11 de abril de 2026. El presidente de Ucrania, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, vía Telegram/Imagen distribuida por REUTERS
Prisioneros de guerra ucranianos tras un intercambio, en medio del ataque ruso contra Ucrania, en un lugar desconocido de Ucrania, según esta fotografía distribuida el 11 de abril de 2026. El presidente de Ucrania, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, vía Telegram/Imagen distribuida por REUTERS

Este jueves el Kremlin anunció unilateralmente “un alto el fuego desde las 16:00 horas (13:00 GMT) del 11 de abril hasta el término del 12 de abril de 2026” sin previas consultas con Estados Unidos ni Ucrania, al que se sumó de inmediato Kiev.

Ambos bandos informaron el viernes sobre otro canje de los cadáveres de mil soldados ucranianos por 41 rusos. En línea con lo acordado el pasado año en Estambul, Moscú habría entregado en torno a 10.000 cuerpos de ucranianos caídos en acción y recibido cerca de 200.

Advertisement

Esta proporción se debe al avance ruso en el frente, que -aunque lento- no permite a los ucranianos recoger a sus caídos en el campo de batalla.

(Con información de EFE)



Europe,Military Conflicts

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Russia, China veto UN resolution aimed at reopening Strait of Hormuz, hours before Trump deadline

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Russia and China vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution Tuesday aimed at reopening the Strait of Hormuz, just hours before President Donald Trump’s deadline for Iran to cease threatening the key waterway. 

Advertisement

Trump has given Iran until 8 p.m. ET to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or face strikes against its power plants and bridges on Tuesday. The resolution received 11 votes in favor and two against, with abstentions from Pakistan and Colombia. 

«No one should tolerate that they are holding the global economy at gunpoint, but today, Russia and China did tolerate,» U.S. Ambassador Mike Waltz said Tuesday. «They sided with a regime that seeks to intimidate the Gulf into submission, even as it brutalizes its own people during a national internet blackout for daring to imagine dignity or freedom.»

«Failing to adopt this resolution sends the wrong signal to the world, to the people of the world — the signal that the threat to international waterways can pass without any decisive action by the international organization responsible for the maintenance of international peace and security,» Bahrain’s foreign minister, Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani, added following the vote. 

Advertisement

US EMBASSIES IN BAHRAIN, EGYPT ISSUE WARNINGS AS IRAN THREATENS UNIVERSITIES ACROSS MIDDLE EAST

Members of the Security Council vote on a resolution to unblock the Strait of Hormuz at U.N. headquarters in New York on April 7, 2026. China and Russia vetoed the resolution. (Timothy A. Clary/AFP via Getty Images)

The vetoed resolution, which was introduced by Bahrain, «strongly encourages states interested in the use of commercial maritime routes in the Strait of Hormuz to coordinate efforts, defensive in nature, commensurate with the circumstances, to contribute to ensuring the safety and security of navigation across the Strait of Hormuz.»

Advertisement

The resolution also demanded that Iran immediately halt attacks on merchant and commercial vessels and stop impeding their freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz and attacking civilian infrastructure. 

The language of the resolution was significantly weakened to try to get Russia and China to abstain rather than veto it, according to The Associated Press. 

The initial Gulf proposal would have authorized countries to use «all necessary means» — U.N. wording that would include military action — to ensure transit through the Strait of Hormuz and deter attempts to close it.

Advertisement

WHY THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ MATTERS AS TRUMP ISSUES FRESH ULTIMATUM TO IRAN

Cargo ships anchored in the Gulf near the Strait of Hormuz seen from northern Ras al-Khaimah

Cargo ships in the Gulf, near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from northern Ras al-Khaimah, near the border with Oman’s Musandam governance, in United Arab Emirates, March 11, 2026. (Reuters/Stringer/File Photo/File Photo)

After Russia, China and France, all veto-wielding countries on the 15-member Security Council, expressed opposition to approving the use of force, the resolution was revised to eliminate all references to offensive action. It would have authorized only «all defensive means necessary.» A vote had been expected on Saturday. 

But instead, the resolution was further weakened to eliminate any reference to Security Council authorization — which is an order for action — and limit its provisions to the Strait of Hormuz. Previous drafts had included adjacent waters. 

Advertisement

«Let me be clear — this text would only embolden the United States and the Israeli regime to continue in their unlawful actions and atrocious crime, while shielding from accountability,» Iran’s ambassador to the U.N., Amir Saeid Iravani, said following the vote.

Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia seated in a meeting room at the United Nations headquarters

Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia, of Russia, waits for the start of a Security Council meeting at U.N. headquarters in New York City on April 7, 2026. (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

«The Iranian regime has until 8 p.m. Eastern Time to meet the moment and make a deal with the United States,» White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News on Tuesday. «Only the president knows where things stand and what he will do.» 

Advertisement

Fox News’ Patrick Ward, Anders Hagstrom and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 



security council, middle east, united nations, war with iran, iran

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Swalwell ripped for changing his tune on how sexual assault victims ‘deserve to be heard’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

California gubernatorial candidate Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., is facing backlash on social media after it was reported that his lawyer was sending cease-and-desist letters to Swalwell’s accusers a day before multiple bombshell allegations were published on Friday.

Advertisement

Swalwell, who once called on lawmakers to hear out women raising allegations against Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh during his 2018 confirmation hearings and said they «deserve to be heard,» is now being slammed for hypocrisy.

«I saw continued demeaning of victims of sexual assault, people who deserve to be heard, people who deserve their allegations to be investigated and a president who wants to rush this through,» Swalwell said in an interview with MSNBC at the time.

«And so, for Brett Kavanaugh’s sake, if he is innocent, I hope tomorrow he opens his statement and says, ‘You know what? Bring in all the victims, all of them to be questioned.’ That will clear his name if he is indeed innocent,» Swalwell added.

Advertisement

SWALWELL VOWS TO MAKE ICE AGENTS ‘UN-HIRABLE’ IN CALIFORNIA STATE GOVERNMENT POSITIONS

California gubernatorial candidate Eric Swalwell waves before speaking at the 2026 California Democratic Party State Convention in San Francisco, Saturday, Feb. 21, 2026. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)

The resurfaced clip comes as Swalwell has made efforts to downplay allegations against him as he leads a crowded field of gubernatorial hopefuls in a race to replace outgoing Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is prevented by term limits from remaining in the role.

Advertisement

Jonathan Turley, a Fox News contributor and Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University, took to X on Friday, saying Swalwell is «hoping that voters will apply a different standard than the one he applied to Justice Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation.»

«When Kavanaugh was asserting his innocence, Swalwell was leading the mob,» Turley continued.

Mike Davis, the former chief counsel for nominations in the Senate Judiciary Committee, posted «Receipt time» on X while resurfacing an old Swalwell post attacking Kavanaugh.

Advertisement

«Oh, how I remember this hypocritical predator peddling these utterly bullsh– allegations against Kavanaugh,» Davis said in another post.

Rumblings of sexual misconduct from Swalwell first emerged last month when Cheyenne Hunt, a former Capitol Hill staffer and a progressive political media personality, began circulating testimony from women who said they had been sexually assaulted by the congressman.

Swalwell’s lawyer, Elias Dabaie, reportedly sent out cease-and-desist letters to try to quell the rumors Thursday, but multiple outlets, including CNN and the San Francisco Chronicle, published bombshell reports Friday, which Swalwell later denied in a video he posted late Friday night on X.

Advertisement

ADAM SCHIFF MAKES ENDORSEMENT IN CALIFORNIA GUBERNATORIAL RACE

Rep. Eric Swalwell delivering a speech at SEIU-USWW gubernatorial candidate worker forum in Los Angeles

Democratic United States Representative Eric Swalwell delivers a speech as he attends the SEIU-United Service Workers West (SEIU-USWW)’s Gubernatorial Candidate Worker Forum at Meruelo Studios in Los Angeles, California, on January 10, 2026. = (Etienne Laurent/AFP)

One of the alleged victims shared her story publicly for the first time, accusing Swalwell of taking advantage of her while she was intoxicated on multiple occasions, according to a report published by the San Francisco Chronicle. 

The alleged victim’s story also included claims that Swalwell pressured her to send naked pictures of herself and sent sexually explicit photos of his own, pulled out his private parts while driving in a car with her and requested she perform oral sex on him, among other incidents the victim said affected how Swalwell treated her professionally.

Advertisement

The unnamed female accuser reportedly worked for Swalwell for about two years and revealed that he started pursuing her, despite being married, shortly after she was hired as a 21-year-old staffer in his district office.  

She also reportedly revealed that years after she worked for Swalwell, she attended an April 2024 charity event Swalwell was being honored at and reunited with him. In her account of the night, which included grabbing drinks with him after the event and later blacking out, she alleged that she remembered pushing Swalwell away and told him «no» as he allegedly tried to force her to have sex with him in his hotel room. 

The woman reportedly texted a friend after the incident telling her she had been sexually assaulted by Swalwell. Other messages reviewed by the San Francisco Chronicle reportedly showed the victim indicating she had «blacked out» but «woke up once during it and even told him to stop at one point.»

Advertisement
Swalwell speaking during hearing

Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) speaks during a House Judiciary Committee hearing with FBI Director Kash Patel in the Rayburn House Office Building on Sept. 17, 2025.  (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 

After the allegations went viral and top Democrats called for him to drop out of the California gubernatorial race, Swalwell said in a video message on X that the «sexual assault allegations are flat false. They are absolutely false. They did not happen. They have never happened and I will fight them with everything that I have.»

«I’ve certainly made mistakes in judgment in my past, but those mistakes are between me and my wife and to her- I apologize deeply for putting her in this position,» Swalwell continued.

Advertisement

«This false, outrageous rumor is being spread 27 days before an election begins by flailing opponents who have sadly teamed up with MAGA conspiracy theorists because they know Eric Swalwell is the frontrunner in this race,» Micah Beasley, a spokesperson for Swalwell, said earlier this week.

Swalwell’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

gavin newsom, issues, eric swalwell, investigations, confirmation of judge kavanaugh

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias