INTERNACIONAL
Veterans flood Democrat’s office with supportive calls as backlash grows over ‘illegal orders’ video
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A Democratic congresswoman and former Air Force captain who joined five other lawmakers in a viral video advising service members they could refuse illegal orders from a president shared a slew of voicemails backing her stance.
The video released by six Democrat lawmakers who are veterans drew sharp rebuke from President Donald Trump, who called them «traitors,» and War Secretary Pete Hegseth, who asked Navy Secretary John Phelan to formally review one senator’s comments in the clip.
Rep. Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, who represents Chester County and Reading, shared a mashup of numerous messages praising her and her colleagues for «standing up» for military members at what the lawmakers involved said was a tenuous time to be serving the public.
DEM SENATOR WHO BASHED HEGSETH’S QUALIFICATIONS STANDS BY DOD SEC WHO OVERSAW BOTCHED AFGHAN WITHDRAWAL
Gov-elects Mikie Sherill and Abigail Spanberger take a selfie with Rep. Christina Houlahan. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Several callers were not constituents, including veterans from as far away as Fairbanks, Alaska. Others said they hailed from Philadelphia, Reading, West Chester, Phoenixville and Berwyn, Pennsylvania, along with Baltimore, Maryland; Carlsbad, California; and beyond.
They identified themselves by their military record as well, including Marine vets, infantry vets, a wounded warrior, a Gulf War vet and descendants of World War I, World War II, Vietnam and Korea.
«I am not a constituent,» one said. «I am a veteran.»
CALIFORNIA DEM TELLS HEGSETH HE’S AN ‘EMBARRASSMENT’ TO THE US, SHOULD ‘GET THE HELL OUT’ OF THE DOD
«Thank you for standing firmly with our service members,» another said.
«I just want to tell her I appreciate her comments, and they’re right,» a third caller said.
Addressing the video’s quotes directly, another veteran expressed gratitude that Houlahan was «letting them know it’s OK to question orders that seem wrong or illegal.»
JEFFRIES BECOMES HIGHEST-RANKING DEM TO CALL FOR HEGSETH TO RESIGN
Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., is interrupted by Capitol Police while questioning Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., during a House Republican news conference. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
«I’m with you. I’m behind you.»
«You have support and gratitude from citizens across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Thank you. That’s all I can tell you. Thank you very much. You’re making the commonwealth very proud. I am so proud of all six of you for making that video,» several callers added in an edited, composite excerpt.
«I will continue to speak up for you because you continue to speak up to me,» another told Houlahan.
SEN. TILLIS OPENS UP ABOUT ROLE IN PETE HEGSETH’S CONFIRMATION AFTER HEGSETH’S EX-SISTER-IN-LAW’S ALLEGATIONS
In response, the White House said Democrats like Houlahan were unable to list any examples of unlawful orders given by Trump or the Pentagon when they were asked.
«Because there have been none,» said White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson.
«It should deeply concern all Americans that elected Democrats are publicly urging the military to openly defy the chain-of-command and the commander in chief’s lawful orders to subvert the will of the American people,» she said.
On Tuesday, Houlahan said the FBI reached out to the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms, who maintain order in the Capitol galleries, requesting interviews with lawmakers in the video.
«President Trump is using the FBI as a tool to intimidate and harass members of Congress,» Houlahan said.
«No amount of intimidation or harassment will ever stop us from doing our jobs and honoring our Constitution.»
REPUBLICAN MILITARY VETS IN CONGRESS ARE ON A MISSION TO GET HEGSETH CONFIRMED
«We will never be bullied. We will never give up the ship,» she said, quoting a line from the video spoken by Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich.
The most prominent lawmaker in the video, Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., has since been subject to an impending investigation by the Pentagon, according to documents.
Kelly, a retired Navy combat pilot and astronaut, is in the distinct category of «retired» — requiring 20 years of service — rather than «former,» a status that allows the Pentagon to recall him for disciplinary action that could include loss of rank or other penalties.
FOX NEWS POLITICS NEWSLETTER: FORMER ARMY CAPTAIN WARNS DEMS’ ‘UNPATRIOTIC’ VIDEO COULD SPARK CHAOS
Hegseth branded Houlahan, Kelly and the others the «Seditious Six,» and his office released a statement saying that all «service members are reminded that they have a legal obligation under the UCMJ to obey lawful orders and that orders are presumed to be lawful.»
«A service member’s personal philosophy does not justify or excuse the disobedience of an otherwise lawful order,» the War Department said.
Houlahan spent two years on active duty in the Air Force from 1989-1991 and the rest of her career in the Reserves until separating in 2004.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Her father was a Naval aviator and she was born at the Naval Air Station Patuxent base in St. Mary’s, Maryland.
Five of the six lawmakers in the video also reportedly received bomb threats to their offices since the release of the video.
Slotkin, Houlahan and Reps. Jason Crow, D-Colo., and Chris Deluzio, D-Pa., received threats to their Capitol Hill offices, while Rep. Maggie Goodlander, the wife of Obama National Security Adviser Jacob Sullivan, was subject to a bomb threat at her local office in Concord, New Hampshire, according to Newsweek.
democrats,military,veterans,pennsylvania,donald trump,wars
INTERNACIONAL
DC court rulings stall Trump agenda across immigration, policing, Fed — raising stakes on executive power
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
President Donald Trump’s second-term agenda is hitting repeated roadblocks in Washington, D.C., federal court, where judges have halted major policies — fueling a growing clash over whether the judiciary is checking executive power or overstepping into it.
The rulings have halted key parts of Trump’s agenda on immigration, policing and federal authority, intensifying debate over whether courts are acting as a constitutional check or obstructing elected leadership.
Here are some of the biggest court clashes Trump is facing in D.C. federal court.
Alien Enemies Act: A centuries-old statute becomes the focus of a modern fight
One of the biggest fights is also one of the earliest lawsuits filed against the Trump administration in D.C. federal court — centered on the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 wartime law, to deport certain migrants to El Salvador’s CECOT prison.
Civil rights groups and immigration advocates have argued the Trump administration is stretching the law beyond its intended use case, including the three previous times it was used in U.S. history — most recently, during World War II. The Trump administration has defended the move as a lawful exercise of executive authority over national security and immigration enforcement.
The case quickly landed in D.C. federal court and has since moved up on appeal, with higher courts now weighing the scope of the president’s authority under the centuries-old statute. The outcome could have sweeping implications for how rarely used emergency powers are applied in modern immigration policy.
EX-JUDGES BLAST TOP TRUMP DOJ OFFICIAL FOR DECLARING ‘WAR’ ON COURTS
Salvadorian troops are seen guarding the exterior of CECOT, or Counter Terrorism Confinement Center, Dec. 15, 2025, in Tecoluca, El Salvador. (John Moore/Getty Images)
Who controls DC streets: Washington or the White House?
The scope of federal power over states and localities has also been tested. Courts have imposed limits on Trump’s efforts to assert control over National Guard units, raising federalism concerns about the balance between state and federal authority.
The standoff began in August 2025. Trump moved to expand federal control over policing in Washington, D.C., including deploying National Guard troops to respond to crime.
A related lawsuit, District of Columbia v. Trump, challenges what city officials describe as an unprecedented federal intrusion into local policing. The case remains a key test of presidential authority over the nation’s capital.
Protected status for Haitian migrants: Temporary or ‘de facto amnesty’?
The Supreme Court agreed to hear a pair of appeals from the Trump administration seeking to immediately halt Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations for Haitian migrants. Haitians were first granted TPS status in 2010 after a devastating earthquake. Previously, a lower court judge in D.C., U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, had blocked the Trump administration from lifting the TPS designation.
U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer urged the high court to take up the broader issue of whether the Trump administration can revoke TPS protections for other migrants living in the U.S. — citing the Justice Department’s appeal of a similar case centered on TPS protections for Syrian migrants that was kicked to the high court earlier this year.
«Unless the court resolves the merits of these challenges — issues that have now been ventilated in courts nationwide — this unsustainable cycle will repeat again and again, spawning more competing rulings and competing views of what to make of this court’s interim orders,» Sauer said last week. «This court should break that cycle.»
The appeal comes as the Trump administration has sought to wind down most TPS designations, arguing the programs have been extended for too long under Democratic presidents.
«Haiti’s TPS was granted following an earthquake that took place over 15 years ago,» said then-spokesperson for DHS Tricia McLaughlin. «It was never intended to be a de facto amnesty program, yet that’s how previous administrations have used it for decades.»
SCOTUS TO REVIEW TRUMP EXECUTIVE ORDER ON BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
USAID: Judges pump the brakes on agency cuts
Early in the term, the administration’s effort to rapidly scale back the U.S. Agency for International Development was halted by a federal judge, who blocked mass leave orders and the dismantling of the agency’s workforce.
The Supreme Court eventually intervened in the case. Last March, the high court denied the Trump administration’s request to block a lower court’s order for the administration to pay nearly $2 billion in foreign aid money for previously completed projects, and leaving to the lower court judge the details of how those contracts should be paid out. That suit was eventually appealed to a higher court, where litigation remains pending.
BIDEN-APPOINTED FEDERAL JUDGE RULES TRUMP’S ‘THIRD COUNTRY’ DEPORTATION POLICY IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook and attorney Abbe Lowell leave the U.S. Supreme Court today in Washington, D.C. (Getty Images)
Can the White House reshape the Fed?
The independence of the Federal Reserve is also an issue before the courts.
Lawyers for the Trump administration asked U.S. District Judge James Boasberg earlier this month to reconsider an earlier order that quashed grand jury subpoenas of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, appearing to make good on a vow from U.S. Attorney for D.C. Jeanine Pirro to appeal the order to a higher court.
In the Justice Department’s motion for reconsideration that was submitted Monday, prosecutors argued that the court «applied an incorrect legal standard, erred with respect to certain facts, and overlooked other relevant facts.»
They argued that a subpoena should be allowed when there is even a «reasonable possibility» that the category of materials the government seeks will produce information «relevant to the general subject of the grand jury’s investigation,» and even where a subpoena recipient «proposes a plausible theory of an ulterior motive.»
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a separate case, Trump v. Cook, earlier this year. That case centered on whether Trump has the power to fire Lisa Cook from the Fed’s board of governors — without notice and largely without the ability for courts to challenge the «for cause» provision underpinning her removal.
Cook remains in her position for now, following an order from U.S. District Court Judge Jia Cobb.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Meanwhile, White House officials have railed against the «activist» judges who they have accused of overstepping their agenda or acting with a political agenda to halt or pause Trump’s policies from taking force.
donald trump, federal courts, supreme court, politics, immigration
INTERNACIONAL
Sistema de agua en ciudad de Panamá vuelve a operar al 100% tras falla en principal potabilizadora
Después de cuatro días de operar al 90% de su capacidad, la planta potabilizadora Federico Guardia Conte de Chilibre volvió a funcionar al 100%, tras completarse los trabajos de reparación e instalación del motor de una de las bombas de la estación de bombeo de agua tratada.
La recuperación de esta infraestructura, la más importante del país para el abastecimiento de agua potable, permite empezar a normalizar el suministro en la ciudad de Panamá y San Miguelito, dos de las zonas más afectadas por la reducción temporal de operaciones.
El restablecimiento llega antes de lo previsto. Cuando se detectó la falla mecánica, las autoridades habían estimado que las labores podrían tomar alrededor de seis días, pero el trabajo técnico concluyó en un plazo menor.
Durante ese período, la planta se mantuvo en funcionamiento parcial, lo que obligó a operar con menor margen en la red de distribución y a advertir sobre posibles interrupciones o variaciones del servicio, sobre todo en los sectores altos y alejados.
La pieza intervenida era clave para sostener la presión y la salida de agua tratada hacia la red. Por eso, aunque la potabilizadora no dejó de producir, la reducción al 90% tuvo efectos inmediatos en el sistema.
En este tipo de eventos, las primeras zonas en resentir el impacto suelen ser las comunidades con menor presión natural o ubicadas en puntos más distantes, donde cualquier merma en la capacidad de bombeo se traduce con rapidez en baja presión, intermitencia o ausencia temporal del suministro.
El comunicado oficial informa que la recuperación al 100% fue posible luego de culminar con éxito la reparación y la instalación del motor, en una jornada extendida que concluyó en horas de la madrugada.
A partir de allí, el restablecimiento del servicio empezó de forma progresiva, especialmente en los puntos altos y alejados de Panamá y San Miguelito que pudieron verse afectados mientras se ejecutaban las labores.
Las autoridades también insistieron en el llamado a usar el agua con moderación para acelerar la recuperación plena del sistema.
La contingencia, además, volvió a dejar en evidencia que la operación de Chilibre sigue dependiendo de equipos críticos cuya falla repercute de inmediato sobre una parte importante del país.
Cuando se anunció el daño, también se explicó que estaba en marcha el proceso para reemplazar cuatro motores en la estación de bombeo, equipos que ya habían sido adquiridos y estaban pendientes de entrega por parte del proveedor. Es decir, la reparación que permitió salir de la emergencia no elimina un problema más amplio de renovación de componentes.
Ese dato es importante porque la avería actual no fue presentada como un episodio aislado. Ya antes la planta había operado con capacidad reducida por fallas similares y, en noviembre del año pasado, una interrupción en el sistema eléctrico la dejó fuera de servicio por varias horas.
En una infraestructura que abastece a gran parte del área metropolitana, la repetición de incidentes mecánicos o eléctricos amplifica la preocupación sobre la estabilidad operativa de un sistema del que dependen miles de hogares.
La planta de Chilibre capta agua del Lago Alajuela y cumple una función estratégica dentro del esquema de distribución nacional. No se trata de una instalación secundaria ni de apoyo: es la principal fuente de agua potable para una enorme franja urbana.
Por eso, cada reducción en su capacidad se convierte en un asunto sensible, no solo por la cantidad de personas afectadas, sino porque cualquier demora en la reparación obliga a redistribuir presión y a administrar con más cuidado un recurso básico en una red ya exigida.
En esta ocasión, el mensaje oficial subraya que la detección rápida de la falla y la coordinación entre especialistas permitieron completar el trabajo antes del tiempo inicialmente proyectado. Ese resultado evita que la contingencia se prolongue durante casi una semana completa, como se había anticipado al inicio.
La normalización total del servicio, sin embargo, no siempre ocurre al mismo ritmo en todos los puntos de la red. Aunque la planta ya funciona a plena capacidad, el agua debe recuperar presión y niveles en el sistema para llegar con estabilidad a las áreas más comprometidas.
En los eventos anteriores, las autoridades ya habían advertido que las zonas más alejadas y elevadas suelen tardar más en volver a la normalidad, por lo que el regreso al 100% de operación no implica que todos los usuarios sientan el efecto de inmediato.
ciudad de panamá 2023.,edificio,estadísticas población,exterior,paisaje urbano,rascacielos
Las claves del fallo por YPF: por qué la Justicia de EE.UU. anuló la condena contra la Argentina
Cómo le fue a las selecciones que juegan el Mundial 2026 en los amistosos de este sábado
Las señales silenciosas de que tu vida sexual está mal y quizás no lo sabías
Comprar y pagar con ChatGPT: cómo se preparan los bancos, las billeteras y las tarjetas para sumar la IA al e-commerce
En el exclusivo Mónaco, el Papa denunció «los abismos entre ricos y pobres»
“Fue un ataque mafioso y político”: la denuncia de La Libertad Avanza tras la agresión en la Universidad Nacional de Lanús
¡VERGÜENZA NACIONAL! Humillan a la Policía Federal mandándolos a un merendero antes de darles un aumento de sueldo digno
El Presidente y Karina Milei volvieron a respaldar a Manuel Adorni tras la polémica por sus vuelos
Manuel Adorni: “Mi patrimonio lo construí antes de entrar al Gobierno, no tengo nada que esconder”
Máximo Kirchner salió al cruce de Milei y Macri tras el fallo por YPF a favor de la Argentina
POLITICA7 horas agoMáximo Kirchner salió al cruce de Milei y Macri tras el fallo por YPF a favor de la Argentina
- POLITICA2 días ago
¡DERIVA ECONÓMICA Y SOBERBIA POLÍTICA! El abismo entre el «relato oficial» y la realidad de una clase media que no aguanta más
- POLITICA20 horas ago
Kicillof refuerza su perfil de candidato y se aferra al fallo de YPF para polarizar con Milei
