Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

La Inteligencia del Reino Unido informó que Rusia lanzó 5.400 ataques aéreos contra Ucrania en el último mes

Published

on


Los equipos de emergencia trabajan en el lugar de un almacén que fue alcanzado durante una noche de ataques rusos con misiles y drones (REUTERS/Thomas Peter)

Según estimaciones de la inteligencia militar británica, Rusia llevó a cabo más de 5.400 ataques aéreos contra territorio ucraniano durante noviembre, siguiendo con la ofensiva al que calificaron como “una guerra de desgaste” orientada a impactar la infraestructura energética de Ucrania y provocar una crisis humanitaria con la llegada del invierno.

El Ministerio de Defensa británico detalló en su informe del sábado que la mayoría de estos ataques se efectuaron mediante aviones no tripulados, complementados por el lanzamiento de 90 misiles desde aviones de largo alcance, un patrón que se mantiene desde los dos meses anteriores.

Advertisement

Rusia ha lanzado más de 5.000 proyectiles en cada uno de los últimos tres meses, con el objetivo de saturar la defensa aérea de Ucrania”, advirtió el ministerio.

El uso intensivo de drones, tanto armados como utilizados como señuelos, muestra la intención rusa de desgastar a las fuerzas ucranianas, que se ven sometidas a una presión constante y encuentran escaso alivio entre oleadas de bombardeos.

Ivan Fedorov, gobernador del óblast de Zaporizhia en Ucrania, mencionó que solo durante la noche del pasado 4 de diciembre, el Ejército ruso utilizó 588 vehículos aéreos no tripulados de diversas modificaciones (principalmente FPV) y 3 lanzacohetes múltiple autopropulsado y blindado MLRS sobre Novoandriivka y Dobropillia en Donetsk, y Charivne en Odessa fueron parte de la ofensiva.

Advertisement
Un residente camina frente a
Un residente camina frente a un edificio de apartamentos en llamas que fue dañado durante un ataque nocturno de drones rusos, en medio del ataque de Rusia a Ucrania, en Zaporiyia, Ucrania. 25 de noviembre 2025. REUTERS/Stringer

El ritmo de lanzamiento de estos proyectiles, indica la inteligencia británica, depende en gran medida del clima y de “consideraciones geopolíticas”, y señalan que cada pausa suele ser seguida de intensos picos de actividad cuando mejoran las condiciones operativas.

A finales de noviembre, la inteligencia británica también advirtió sobre las “dificultades” que enfrentan los sistemas de defensa aérea de Rusia ante el avance de Ucrania en ataques con drones, logrando impactar objetivos de modo cada vez más “efectivo” incluso en zonas próximas a la línea de frente, según comunicó la cartera británica de Defensa en la red social X.

Los detalles señalan que los recientes ataques ucranianos “enfatizan las dificultades de los sistemas de defensa aérea rusos a la hora de proteger ubicaciones militares al alcance de las crecientes capacidades ucranianas en materia de aparatos aéreos no tripulados, particularmente así de cerca de la línea de frente”.

Uno de los ejemplos mencionados en el informe es el ataque ucraniano del 5 de noviembre, cuando Kiev utilizó drones y misiles para golpear una base rusa en las cercanías del aeropuerto de Donetsk, una zona bajo control ruso y empleada para almacenar, fabricar y lanzar drones contra posiciones ucranianas.

Advertisement
Un residente lleva una silla
Un residente lleva una silla recogida de un edificio alcanzado durante el ataque ruso con misiles y drones (REUTERS/Mykola Synelnykov)

Las recientes estimaciones del Reino Unido surgen luego de que el premier británico Keir Starmer, y su homólogo noruego, Jonas Gahr Store, anunciaran en Londres la firma de un acuerdo de defensa que incluye una alianza naval con el propósito de “contrarrestar la amenaza submarina rusa”.

Este acuerdo bilateral, valorado en 10.000 millones de libras esterlinas (alrededor de 13.300 millones de dólares), se enmarca en el contexto de la creciente presencia de unidades submarinas rusas cerca de infraestructuras críticas en el Atlántico Norte, y en un incremento del 30% en el avistamiento de buques rusos en aguas británicas durante los últimos dos años, según datos del Ministerio de Defensa del Reino Unido.

El convenio estipula que las armadas británica y noruega, ambas integrantes de la OTAN, operarán conjuntamente una flota de al menos 13 fragatas Tipo 26, fabricadas en el Reino Unido y diseñadas específicamente para misiones antisubmarinas.

El primer ministro británico, Sir
El primer ministro británico, Sir Keir Starmer, y el primer ministro de Noruega, Jonas Gahr Store, visitan la RAF Lossiemouth en Escocia, Gran Bretaña, para conmemorar la firma del pacto de defensa entre el Reino Unido y Noruega (Paul Campbell/REUTERS)

“Este acuerdo histórico con Noruega fortalece nuestra capacidad para proteger nuestras fronteras y la infraestructura crítica de la que dependen nuestras naciones”, aseguró Starmer durante la ceremonia de firma.

La nueva fuerza conjunta patrullará áreas estratégicas del Atlántico Norte, en particular las extensas aguas entre Groenlandia, Islandia y el Reino Unido, regiones consideradas esenciales para la defensa y la vigilancia de cables y oleoductos submarinos que transportan comunicaciones, energía y gas.

Advertisement

(Con información de Europa Press)



Europe,Military Conflicts

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Dos novios bajaron 43 kilos antes de su casamiento y la transformación dejó en shock a los invitados

Published

on


Una pareja de novios se propuso bajar de peso antes del casamiento y su cambio físico dejó en shock a los invitados. En total, perdieron 43 kilos y las fotos del antes y el después son impactantes.

Riley e Isaac Anastasiu, de 30 y 27 años respectivamente, tomaron la decisión de adoptar hábitos saludables seis meses antes de la boda con el objetivo de verse y sentirse lo mejor posible en su día especial y se acompañaron mutuamente en el proceso.

Advertisement

Leé también: Encerró a su hija de 5 años para que no lo moleste mientras jugaba videojuegos y la nena murió de hambre

“Nos dimos cuenta de que no nos sentíamos lo mejor posible física o mentalmente, y nuestros hábitos no estaban alineados con cómo queríamos aparecer para este próximo capítulo”, explicó Riley en diálogo con People.

Fue una decisión mutua arraigada en el trabajo en equipo y el estímulo. Y honestamente, las fotos de la boda duran para siempre. Queríamos mirar hacia atrás en ese día y sentirnos confiados, orgullosos y totalmente presentes, sin ningún arrepentimiento, solo amor por el momento y el uno por el otro”, agregó.

Advertisement

El antes y después de Riley e Isaac. (Fotos: gentileza People)

En mayo de 2025 la pareja decidió cambiar su destino. Ambos pesaban 99 kilos. Para el 21 de noviembre, día en el cual se juraron amor eterno, Riley pesaba 79 e Isaac 76. Es decir, entre los dos perdieron unos 43 kilos.

En sus redes sociales, compartieron el proceso y publicaron fotos de los notables cambios físicos que tuvieron. Los usuarios de la plataforma no podían creer la transformación.

Advertisement

Riley dijo que sus allegados se sorprendieron aún más con Isaac: “Algunos amigos y familiares estaban realmente sorprendidos porque no lo habían visto en un tiempo y no es muy activo en las redes sociales”, contó.

“Desde que comparto más de mi vida en línea, la gente ya estaba familiarizada con mi transformación, por lo que las reacciones a mí eran más esperadas. Pero en general, la respuesta fue increíblemente solidaria y llena de amor”, destacó.

El antes y después de Riley. (Foto: gentileza People)

El antes y después de Riley. (Foto: gentileza People)

Según contó la novia, no hicieron ningún tratamiento especial ni se sometieron a dietas raras para conseguir bajar de peso. Sino que lo hicieron de forma natural, controlando las calorías y poniéndose en movimiento.

Advertisement

Ella caminaba entre 10.000 y 15.000 pasos al día, hizo pilates desde casa de vez en cuando, controló el azúcar, priorizó el sueño de calidad y optó por alimentos integrales.

Leé también: Video: una esquiadora fue atacada por un leopardo de las nieves

Isaac, por su parte, empezó a correr, y ahora incluso está entrenando para una maratón. Además, aplicó el ayuno intermitente, un déficit calórico y un enfoque en alimentos integrales y nutritivos.

Advertisement

El desafío los hizo sentirse bien con su aspecto físico pero, según cuentan, los cambios internos fueron aún mejores: “El día de nuestra boda, nos sentimos increíblemente orgullosos, confiados y totalmente presentes”, contó Riley.

El antes y después de Isaac. (Foto: gentileza People)

El antes y después de Isaac. (Foto: gentileza People)

“Los cambios físicos importaban, pero lo que significaba más era lo fuertes, disciplinados y conectados que nos sentíamos después de comprometernos con ese objetivo juntos. De pie allí, no estábamos pensando en nuestros cuerpos ni dudando de cómo nos veíamos en las fotos. Simplemente estábamos disfrutando del momento, absorbiéndolo todo y celebrando el trabajo que hacemos como equipo”, detalló.

Se sintió como la manera perfecta de comenzar nuestro matrimonio sintiéndonos alineados, apoyados y confiados en nosotros mismos y el uno en el otro”, afirmó.

Advertisement

Antes de cerrar, incentivó a otras personas que deseen llevar una vida saludable a que “empiecen de a poco”. “Concéntrate en los hábitos que realmente puedes mantener”, enfatizó y agregó: “La consistencia importa mucho más que la perfección. Encuentra el movimiento que disfrutes, alimenta tu cuerpo con alimentos integrales, prioriza el sueño y ten paciencia contigo mismo”.

“Si lo estás haciendo con un compañero o un sistema de apoyo, apóyate en eso. Tener a alguien que te anime y te haga responsable hace una gran diferencia. Lo más importante es que tu objetivo sea sentirte más fuerte, más saludable y más seguro en lugar de perseguir un número en la escala. Cuando se basa en el respeto propio y la sostenibilidad, los resultados realmente duran”, concluyó.

casamiento, novios, cambio físico, Estados Unidos

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Dems’ DHS shutdown threat would hit FEMA, TSA while immigration funding remains intact

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Senate is again on the verge of entering into another government shutdown as Democrats rage over the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti during an immigration enforcement operation in Minnesota.

Advertisement

But despite Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Senate Democrats’ demands to sideline the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding bill, the agency’s immigration enforcement apparatus is flush with cash thanks to Republicans’ efforts last year with President Donald Trump’s «one big, beautiful bill.» 

Still, there are other vital government functions under the DHS umbrella that, should a partial government shutdown happen come Friday, would suffer.

THUNE STEAMROLLS DEMS’ DHS REVOLT AS FETTERMAN DEFECTS, SCHUMER UNDER PRESSURE

Advertisement

Senate Democrats are readying to rebel against DHS funding, but the action would do little to harm funding to Secretary Kristi Noem’s immigration operations. It would, however, affect several other functions under the agency’s purview. (Al Drago/Getty Images)

Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Fox News in a statement that while Schumer and Senate Democrats «play games with Americans’ safety, they are blocking vital DHS funding that keeps our country secure and its people safe.»

The department, created in 2003 after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, has jurisdiction over a broad range of agencies, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the U.S. Coast Guard, and the Secret Service.

Advertisement

That means those offices would likely be impacted by a partial government shutdown come next month.

«This funding supports national security and critical national emergency operations, including FEMA responses to a historic snowstorm that is affecting 250 million Americans,» McLaughlin said. «Washington may stall, but the safety of the American people will not wait.»

The current DHS funding bill, which is snarled in a political duel between Schumer and Senate Republicans, would provide $64 billion for the agency. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would receive $10 billion of that. 

Advertisement

The largest allocation would go to FEMA at $32 billion, then TSA at $11.6 billion, and CISA at $2.6 billion. 

GOP SENATOR DEMANDS DHS IMMIGRATION CHIEFS TESTIFY AFTER FATAL SHOOTINGS IN MINNESOTA

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has coalesced behind a plan to strip the DHS funding bill from a broader spending package. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)

Even if the government shuts down, immigration operations would likely be untouched.

Advertisement

DHS received billions as part of Trump’s marquee legislation, a move to meet his and Republicans’ desire last year to turbocharge border security and immigration operations on the heels of former President Joe Biden’s term. 

In total, the «big, beautiful bill,» added over $170 billion to DHS’ coffers. 

Notably, ICE received a total of $75 billion, split into two pots: $45 billion for detention expansion and roughly $29 billion for immigration enforcement operations.

Advertisement

The detention funding is set to last through FY 2029, effectively giving the agency about $10 billion per year — their average base budget — without the need for congressional approval during that period. 

Schumer and Senate Democrats contend that they want to continue negotiations on the DHS bill and strip it from a broader six-bill funding package, called a «minibus.» Doing so would almost certainly guarantee a government shutdown, given that any changes would have to go back to the House. 

«If Leader Thune puts those five bills on the floor this week, we can pass them right away,» Schumer said. «If not, Republicans will again be responsible for another government shutdown.»

Advertisement

WHITE HOUSE NOT BUDGING ON DEMOCRATS’ DEMANDS AS DHS FUNDING MUTINY THREATENS GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN

Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., speaks to reporters at a press conference.

Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., played a vital role in ending the last shutdown, and as chair of the Senate Homeland Security Appropriations Committee, will again act as a key negotiator in averting another closure. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Still, it would complicate matters for the remaining agencies under DHS’ purview, and create a déjà vu scenario akin to the last government shutdown, which barreled onward for 43 days. 

The shutdown saw TSA agents go unpaid for weeks — spurring massive travel delays across the country as both they and air traffic controllers were forced to call out of work and take on second jobs to make ends meet, or otherwise work without pay.

Advertisement

Notably, air traffic controllers would be similarly affected this time around as well. Funding for the Department of Transportation is included in the larger minibus the Senate is expected to consider this week.

The threat of missed paychecks for the U.S. Coast Guard — along with other members of the Armed Forces, because the defense funding bill is included in the minibus as well — would also rear its ugly head and become a political quagmire for lawmakers once again.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Cuts to FEMA could also impact its ability to help everyday Americans during natural disasters, with the agency’s Disaster Relief Fund (DRF) in danger of running dry without more congressionally approved funding. A program that helps Americans in flood-prone areas secure home insurance would similarly be imperiled.

Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., played a vital role in ending the last shutdown, and as chair of the Senate Homeland Security Appropriations Committee, will again act as a key negotiator in averting another closure.

She noted that DHS goes beyond just immigration operations, and reminded Senate Democrats of the cost of the last shutdown. 

Advertisement

«We know from recent history that government shutdowns do not help anyone and are not in the best interest of the American people,» Britt said in a statement. «As we approach a government funding deadline, I remain committed to finding a pathway forward.»

politics,senate,government shutdown,chuck schumer,kristi noem,donald trump

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

How Israel’s West Bank security realities are reshaping the two-state debate

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Israel Defense Forces conducted approximately 80 brigade-level counterterrorism operations over the past year in the West Bank — known to Israelis as Judea and Samaria — neutralizing hundreds of terrorists and seizing more than 1,300 weapons, according to data released by the military.

Advertisement

The IDF said overall Palestinian terrorist activity in the area declined sharply in 2025, with incidents down 78% compared to the previous year. Attacks involving firearms dropped by 86%, the data showed.

Security remains essential in Israel’s ancient heartland, home to more than 500,000 Jews and up to 3 million Palestinians, and is at the center of intense political and diplomatic debate. Many Israeli officials argue that Jerusalem must assert sovereignty over the territory. 

TRUMP LAUNCHES PHASE 2 OF GAZA PEACE PLAN — BUT HAMAS DISARMAMENT REMAINS THE REAL TEST

Advertisement

A view showing the West Bank, also known as Judea and Samaria. Evangelical Christian leaders are pushing the Trump administration to recognize Israel’s right to the biblical heartland. (TPS-IL)

Under the 1993 Oslo Accords, brokered during the Clinton administration, the West Bank was divided into three areas: Area A, under full Palestinian control; Area B, under Palestinian civil authority and Israeli security control; and Area C, under full Israeli authority.

A 2020 plan by the Trump administration, known as «Peace to Prosperity,» envisioned Israeli annexation of parts of Judea and Samaria but was shelved in favor of the Abraham Accords, which normalized Israel’s relations with four Arab countries. In July 2024, the Knesset plenum overwhelmingly rejected the establishment of a Palestinian state, and in July 2025, approved a declaration calling on the government to apply sovereignty in Judea and Samaria as well as the Jordan Valley, something Vice President JD Vance described as a «very stupid political stunt,» when asked his thoughts on the vote.

Advertisement

On a visit to Israel, he said, «The West Bank is not going to be annexed by Israel… The policy of the Trump administration is that the West Bank will not be annexed by Israel. That will continue to be our policy. And if people want to take symbolic votes, they can do that, but we certainly weren’t happy about it.»

VANCE REBUKES ISRAEL ON ‘VERY STUPID’ VOTE TO ANNEX WEST BANK

Why Israel Says It Can’t Give Up Judea and Samaria

west bank death

A Palestinian man throws a stone at an Israeli armed vehicle during a protest in the town of Beita, in the West Bank on July 26, 2024. ( Wahaj Bani Moufleh /Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

Focusing on the national security significance of the area, Lt. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Conricus, a former IDF international spokesperson and now a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital that fundamental principles of warfare apply to the area.

Advertisement

«High ground, or elevated terrain, remains critical and extremely important in defending a country, its people and its sovereignty,» Conricus said. «I cannot identify any credible professional military assessment that would suggest it is wise for Israel to allow a hostile entity to dominate high terrain that controls, by line of sight and fire, most of modern Israel west of the 1949 armistice line, where 80% of Israel’s GDP and 70% of its population reside.»

WALTZ HAILS ‘NIGHT-AND-DAY’ MIDDLE EAST SHIFT AS TRUMP’S GAZA PLAN RESHAPES REGION

Conricus said that no Israeli government could relinquish military control over the area without endangering the most basic security of the State of Israel.

Advertisement

He emphasized that the area defines Israel’s eastern border and noted that, while Israel currently maintains strategic peace with Jordan, the kingdom remains unstable and vulnerable to both internal and external pressures.

West Bank

The Jewish settlement of Har Bracha is located in the biblical heartland of Samaria on the West Bank. (Eytan Schweber/TPS)

«It could be jihadist elements, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas or the Iranian regime,» he said. «Israel has to have an eastern border that is a natural barrier. The Jordan River is a natural barrier that limits the movement of troops, tanks and vehicles, and provides a border that is defensible,» he said.

ISRAEL FM ACCUSES PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY OF AIDING TERROR WITH ‘PAY-FOR-SLAY’ AFTER DEADLY ATTACK

Advertisement

Dan Diker, president of the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs, pointed to the concept of defensible borders that emerged after the 1967 Six-Day War.

«As a result, Israel gained a major defensive position and strategic depth it had never previously possessed,» Diker said, noting that Israel had been only nine miles wide at its narrowest point in the north.

After the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, massacre, Diker said its strategic importance has increased amid concerns that a similar large-scale attack could occur there, given the widespread flow of weapons.

Advertisement

«Although we control between 60% and 75% of the region, Iran has been penetrating the Jordanian border,» he said, adding that Hamas incitement has energized jihadist networks.

Biblical, Historical and National Identity

Yishai Fleisher, international spokesman for Hebron — the cradle of Jewish civilization located in Judea — told Fox News Digital that the vast majority of events described in the Bible took place in Judea and Samaria.

Hebron, he said, is home to the Tomb of the Patriarchs and Matriarchs, while Jerusalem is where the two Jewish Temples stood and where King David reigned. In Bet El, the Biblical account of Jacob’s dream of the ladder took place.

Advertisement
Sebastia, West Bank.

Visitors arrive at Sebastia National Park in Samaria. Sebastia was the Israelite kingdom during the reigns of Omri and Ahab. (Hillel Maeir/TPS-IL)

«The reason we have national aspirations in the Land of Israel is because of our history,» Fleisher said. He also cited an initiative to rename Route 60 — which runs through many Biblical cities — the «Biblical Highway.»

Who Are the Hilltop Youth — and Why Israel Sees Them as a Problem

Earlier this month, IDF troops were dispatched to the Shavei Shomron Junction following reports that dozens of masked Israeli suspects had vandalized property in the area. Several Palestinian vehicles were torched, and two Palestinians were injured. A day later, IDF troops were dispatched to the area of Jalud following reports that Israeli civilians had vandalized a local school. In a separate incident in the Bizzariya area, several Palestinian vehicles were set on fire and property was damaged.

In 2025, the IDF recorded an increase of approximately 27% in anti-Palestinian crimes.

Advertisement

Governor of Binyamin and Chairman of the Yesha Council Yisrael Ganz told Fox News Digital that Judea and Samaria has been in a state of war since Oct. 7. Over the past year, he said, citing Shin Bet data, there were more than 4,000 attempted attacks against Israelis.

UN AMBASSADOR WALTZ REVEALS TRUMP’S MIDDLE EAST PEACE PLAN IS ‘THE ONLY WAY FORWARD’

Hilltop Youth, West Bank

Hilltop Youth run for cover as they clash with Israeli security forces evacuating and demolishing an illegal outpost built near the Jewish settlement of Metzad east of the Palestinian city of Sa’ir in the West Bank, on Nov. 17, 2025. Israeli security forces evacuated and demolished an illegal settler outpost in the occupied West Bank on Nov. 17, with the authorities citing «severe incidents of violence.» (Menahem Kahana/AFP via Getty Images)

Ganz cited former Shin Bet head Yoram Cohen, who said only 1.5% of Shin Bet cases involve Jews, while roughly 80% focus on Arab terrorism.

Advertisement

«Yes, there are incidents of violence, but the number of Jews who attack Arabs is negligible,» Ganz said, condemning extremist youth as a small and unrepresentative minority.

Ganz argued that the absence of Israeli sovereignty creates a legal gray zone that enables extremism.

«When there is governance, security and economic opportunity, there is no room for anarchy or violence,» he said, envisioning Judea and Samaria as «the Israeli Tuscany.»

Advertisement

Is the Two-State Solution Still Viable — or Just Diplomatic Habit?

Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren told Fox News Digital that the two-state solution was never viable but rather a diplomatic reflex.

«The Palestinians hold the world record for a people who have been offered a two-state solution and have rejected it,» Oren said. «They rejected it in 1937, the British offer in 1947, the American-Israeli offer in 2001, and the subsequent offer in 2008.»

According to polls, Oren said, most Palestinians oppose a two-state solution and support the Oct. 7 attacks.

Advertisement

«Rather, the two-state solution is viewed as an interim stage toward a one-state solution,» he said, a phrase often used as a euphemism for the eventual destruction of Israel through demographic change.

militant fighters holding guns

Palestinian terrorists from the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades appear carrying their weapons during a military parade in the Balata refugee camp, east of Nablus, in the northern West Bank. ((Photo by Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images))

While acknowledging Palestinian self-rule in Areas A and B, Oren said a fully sovereign Palestinian state is impossible.

«It could not have control over its borders, nor control over strategic affairs, such as entering a defense pact with Iran. It will never be a classic sovereign state, but it could be more than what they have today,» he said.

Advertisement

While a two-state solution once seemed inevitable, Dan Shapiro — who served as U.S. ambassador to Israel under President Barack Obama and as deputy assistant secretary of Defense for the Middle East under President Joe Biden — told Fox News Digital that it has not been viable for many years and may now be harder to envision than ever, particularly in the aftermath of Oct. 7.

ISRAEL CALLS UN PUSH FOR PALESTINE STATEHOOD A ‘CHARADE,’ WARNS OF ‘CONSEQUENCES’ FOR RECOGNITION MOVES

Still, Shapiro said, the framework remains a fixture of Middle East diplomacy due to the lack of viable alternatives for resolving the conflict between two peoples living in one land, each with legitimate claims to a homeland.

Advertisement

«President Trump includes a credible pathway to a Palestinian state in his 20-point plan to stabilize Gaza and remove Hamas from power. Presidents Biden and Trump have both viewed progress toward a Palestinian state as part of the formula to achieve Saudi normalization with Israel,» Shapiro said.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seen as U.S. President Donald Trump prepares to deliver remarks to the Knesset.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seen as U.S. President Donald Trump prepares to deliver remarks to the Knesset on Oct. 13, 2025 in Jerusalem. President Trump is visiting the country hours after Hamas released the remaining Israeli hostages captured on Oct. 7, 2023, part of a U.S.-brokered ceasefire deal to end the war in Gaza. (Photo by Kenny Holston – Pool/Getty Images)

«None of this means it can happen soon, or perhaps at all. If it ever does, it will take longer and look different from earlier efforts. It is not a copy-and-paste of ideas from the Oslo era. But that credible pathway to a Palestinian state — one that would live peacefully alongside a secure Israel — difficult as it is, remains relevant,» he added.

Shapiro noted that even Israel’s current government — the most right-wing in the country’s history and one that includes multiple proponents of annexation — has stopped short of applying sovereignty across the West Bank, a sign, he said, that the political and diplomatic costs remain too high.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«President Trump has announced that it will not happen because he promised Arab states — the same ones he does business with and relies on to help stabilize Gaza — that it will not happen, and Netanyahu will not oppose him on it,» Shapiro said.

Shapiro said that preserving the possibility of establishing a Palestinian state on some portion of the territory — even if it appears distant and would require major changes in Palestinian leadership and society — has remained relevant, even under Israeli governments that profess to oppose any two-state outcome. 

Advertisement



israel,middle east,hamas,national security

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias