INTERNACIONAL
House conservatives skeptical as Senate deal sacrificing DHS spending reached: ‘Non-starter’

Deal talks intensify as shutdown risk grows
Fox News congressional correspondent Bill Melugin reports on the DHS bill and negotiations between the White House and Senate, as the risk of a partial government shutdown grows on ‘Special Report.’
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
House conservatives are expressing skepticism after Senate Democrats and the White House announced a deal had been reached to fund the government without a long-term Department of Homeland Security funding bill. One House member warned that Republicans should not give in to demands to «handcuff ICE.»
With any deal reached in the Senate needing approval in the House of Representatives, Rep. Mark Harris, R-N.C., told Fox News Digital, «[Senate Minority Leader Chuck] Schumer’s current demands, compounded by a lack of conservative priorities, are an absolute non-starter» in the lower chamber.
«With Chuck Schumer’s demands to handcuff ICE and his Democrat colleagues threatening to shut down the government over it, this is yet another example of the radical left prioritizing criminals over American citizens,» said Harris.
Schumer, D-N.Y., and President Donald Trump labored over a deal from late night Wednesday into Thursday evening after the top Senate Democrat unleashed several funding demands and the White House accused Schumer of blocking a meeting with rank-and-file Democrats.
7 REPUBLICANS JOIN DEMS TO BLOCK MAJOR GOVERNMENT FUNDING PACKAGE AS SHUTDOWN LOOMS
The U.S. Capitol (Emma Woodhead/Fox News Digital)
«The separation of the five bipartisan bills the Democrats asked for, plus the two-week DHS [continuing resolution] has been agreed to,» Schumer said in a statement.
In response, one House conservative remarked to Fox News Digital, «We’re still looking at what is being discussed in the deal, but 14 days is awfully short.»
«We sure think we should be getting something out of this deal when it’s Democrats who are threatening a shutdown, not Republicans,» the House member said.
Not all House Republicans were against the compromise. Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind., reacted on X, «I stand with @POTUS, a shutdown will only hurt the American people. I will vote YES on this package should it make it through the Senate!»
In a Truth Social post on Thursday evening, Trump urged the GOP to agree to the deal, saying, «Hopefully, both Republicans and Democrats will give a very much-needed bipartisan ‘YES’ Vote.»
NEW DEM PROPOSAL WOULD RESTRICT ICE’S KEY TOOL TO DETAIN CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS

The White House and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., reached an agreement to fund the government on Thursday, sidelining the controversial DHS funding bill in the process. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images; Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters)
The president added that the «only thing that can slow our Country down is another long and damaging Government Shutdown.»
«I am working hard with Congress to ensure that we are able to fully fund the Government, without delay,» Trump said. «Republicans and Democrats in Congress have come together to get the vast majority of the Government funded until September, while at the same time providing an extension to the Department of Homeland Security (including the very important Coast Guard, which we are expanding and rebuilding like never before).»
The deal brokered between the two would see the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding bill stripped from the broader six-bill package. Schumer and Democrats have been adamant that if the bill is sidelined, they’d vote for the remaining five, which includes funding for the Pentagon.
Their agreement also tees up a short-term funding extension, known as a continuing resolution (CR), for two weeks to keep the agency funded while lawmakers negotiate restrictions on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
If passed in the Senate, the deal would still need to pass the House again. With lawmakers there not expected back in Washington until Feb. 2, three days after the Jan. 30 funding deadline, a brief partial government shutdown is all but certain.
HOUSE FREEDOM CAUCUS DRAWS LINE ON DHS, ICE FUNDING AS MINNEAPOLIS UNREST FUELS SHUTDOWN RISK

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., has yet to weigh in on the deal. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo)
Tensions have been boiling over in the House over the prospect of the Senate’s compromise on DHS.
Caucus member Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., told Fox News Digital via text message on Thursday, «THE HOUSE DID OUR JOB BY PASSING THE REMAINING SIX APPROPRIATION BILLS TO THE SENATE AND THERE IS NO RATIONAL REASON TO REMOVE DHS FROM THE APPROVAL PROCESS.»
Norman accused Democrats of trying to «demonize» and «bludgeon» DHS, adding, «IF THE DEMOCRATS WANT TO SHUT THE GOVERNMENT DOWN, ‘DO IT’!!»
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Meanwhile, Mark Bednar, a GOP strategist and former spokesperson for then Speaker Kevin McCarthy, told Fox News Digital, «President Trump wants to ensure that our troops, air traffic controllers and DHS patriots are on the job and get paid, and this path will help ensure they do that.
«It’s now on Democrats to negotiate in good faith with President Trump so that the homeland is secured with a long-term funding bill — because that’s what the American people want and deserve.»
Fox News Digital’s Alex Miller contributed to this report.
government shutdown,senate,house of representatives politics,donald trump,chuck schumer,homeland security
INTERNACIONAL
El dictador Miguel Díaz-Canel dijo que mantiene conversaciones con EEUU en medio de la crisis energética de Cuba

El dictador de Cuba, Miguel Díaz-Canel, confirmó este viernes que su régimen sostiene conversaciones con representantes del gobierno de Estados Unidos con el objetivo de buscar soluciones a las diferencias existentes entre ambos países. Luego del anuncio, brindó una conferencia de prensa.
Las declaraciones se produjeron tras recientes intercambios orientados a identificar y resolver los principales temas que afectan la relación entre La Habana y Washington.
Según lo expresado por Díaz-Canel, las charlas con EEUU se desarrollan en un contexto internacional que ha facilitado el acercamiento. El cubano sostuvo que el propósito principal es “identificar cuáles son los problemas bilaterales que necesitan una solución a partir de la gravedad que tienen, de la incidencia que tienen”. Además, subrayó la importancia de encontrar soluciones que beneficien a los pueblos de ambas naciones.
“Hace más de tres meses que no entra ningún barco de combustible”, sostuvo en declaraciones a la prensa; al tiempo que acotó: “Que no ingrese petróleo genera un impacto inconmensurable en la vida de nuestro pueblo”.
Preguntado sobre los contactos con la Administración Trump, remarcó: “Estos son procesos que se hacen con mucha discreción. Son procesos largos. Todo lleva un tiempo. Estamos en las fases iniciales de ese proceso“.
“Funcionarios cubanos sostuvieron recientemente conversaciones con representantes del gobierno de EEUU para buscar, por la vía del diálogo, soluciones para las diferencias que tenemos. El objetivo es detectar los problemas bilaterales, cuáles son las vías, ver si hay voluntad de las partes y encontrar áreas de cooperación”, describió.
Luego sostuvo que “es todo un proceso muy sensible que se aborda con responsabilidad y mucha seriedad. En esos intercambios hemos expresado nuestra voluntad de continuar el proceso bajo el principio de la igualdad y el respeto de ambos países».
En un mensaje drigido a la nación minutos antes de la rueda de prensa, el dictador enfatizó en la necesidad de determinar la disposición de ambas partes para concretar acciones conjuntas. Entre los puntos abordados, reiteró la identificación de áreas de cooperación para enfrentar amenazas comunes y garantizar la seguridad y la paz, tanto en los dos países como en la región de América Latina y el Caribe.
“Identificar áreas de cooperación para enfrentar las amenazas y garantizar la seguridad y la paz de ambas naciones, y también en la región donde desarrollamos nuestra vida, que es la región de América Latina y el Caribe”, detalló Díaz-Canel.
En su intervención, recordó que no es práctica del liderazgo de la revolución cubana responder a “campañas especulativas” sobre este tipo de temas, dado el carácter “sensible” de las negociaciones. “Se trata de un tema que se desarrolla como parte de un proceso muy sensible”, insistió.
El líder cubano aseguró que, en los intercambios, la parte de Cuba ha expresado su voluntad de llevar adelante el proceso sobre la base del respeto a los sistemas políticos de ambos Estados, así como de la soberanía y la autodeterminación de sus gobiernos. “Esto se ha planteado tomando en cuenta un sentido de reciprocidad y de apego al derecho internacional”, puntualizó.
“La culpa no es del gobierno, no es de la revolución. La culpa es del bloqueo enérgetico que nos han impuesto”, justificó.
Las conversaciones entre La Habana y Washington se producen en un momento en el que la isla está sumida en una profunda crisis política, económica y social.
El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, había asegurado en varias ocasiones durante las últimas semanas que representantes de su gobierno estaban manteniendo contactos con autoridades de la isla. La Habana lo había negado.
Este jueves, el régimen anunció la excarcelación de 51 presos después de mantener contactos con El Vaticano. El comunicado del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores sobre esta decisión no hacía ninguna mención a EEUU.
Corporate Events,South America / Central America,Government / Politics
INTERNACIONAL
Iran conflict could be push GOP needs for 2nd ‘big, beautiful bill’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Top House Republicans are eyeing a surge in military funding as the U.S. continues its joint operation with Israel against Iran, and some are arguing that a second «big, beautiful bill» is the vehicle to get it done.
Republicans are discussing the possibility of supplemental funding to aid the U.S. effort as Iran continues to retaliate against allies in the region.
Senior House GOP lawmakers told Fox News Digital that the resulting heightened national security environment means that Congress has a responsibility to ensure the Armed Forces are prepared for whatever threats may arise. At the same time, they’re skeptical that Democrats will provide the votes necessary to pass such a funding bill through traditional means.
«They are certainly not going to spend an additional dime on the military, on security, on any of the things that we care about,» Republican Study Committee Chairman August Pfluger, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital of the opposing party. «The threats around the world have never been higher. They’ve never been greater. And we have to recapitalize after four just disastrous years of President Biden completely decimating our military.»
OPERATION EPIC FURY SURVIVES SENATE CHALLENGE AS REPUBLICANS CLOSE RANKS BEHIND TRUMP
Mourners reach out to coffins during a funeral for people killed during the ongoing U.S.-Israeli military campaign in Isfahan, Iran, on March 5, 2026. (Payman Shahsanaei/ISNA via AP)
«So this conflict right now, and the future of our country and our Western values, have to be secured by additional defense spending, which can only happen in a reconciliation bill.»
Republicans passed a sweeping tax and policy bill last summer dubbed President Donald Trump’s landmark One Big, Beautiful Bill Act. It was done via the budget reconciliation process, which allows the party in power to change broad swaths of fiscal law while sidelining the minority party — in this case, Democrats.
It makes that possible by lowering the threshold for advancing legislation in the Senate from 60 votes to a simple majority, lining it up with the House.
REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: GOP TARGETS AFFORDABILITY WITH RECONCILIATION 2.0 PLAN AHEAD OF MIDTERMS
House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, said he believed an additional funding package for Iran was inevitable but added, «The politics are such that there’s no guarantee that the supplemental will pass.»
«On top of that, the president has been talking about a big capital investment to modernize the military,» Arrington told Fox News Digital.
«If we can’t get Democrats to support either of those endeavors — I think we’ve got a better chance of getting support on an emergency supplemental than we do on a one-time capital investment — but I think that reconciliation may be the only train leaving the station that could address those important things.»

Republican Study Committee Chairman August Pfluger speaks during a press conference with other members of the Republican Study Committee as well as members of House Republican leadership in Washington, D.C., on Oct. 28, 2025. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Pfluger also signaled a broader path: «Is it specific to Iran or is it more general and more broad to just increasing defense spending and making sure that our military has what they need to deter Iran and others? I think that’s probably the more likely path.»
However, he noted that reconciliation meant that spending would likely have to be offset by cuts elsewhere, something that could appease fiscal hawks wary of bloated spending levels.
«So where do we find the savings? I’ve got some ideas on that. I think it’s related to fraud. I think there’s a lot of money to be saved when we look at fraud, like what happened in Minnesota with the daycares and the billions of dollars that went out the window there,» Pfluger said.
THE HITCHHIKER’S GUIDE TO CONGRESS’ OPTIONS ON HAMSTRINGING TRUMP’S WAR POWERS IN IRAN
The idea of a second reconciliation bill has already been met with skepticism by a significant number of Republicans, many of whom have cited the GOP’s razor-thin majorities in the House and Senate.
But a senior House Republican who also spoke with Fox News Digital argued that the situation in Iran could bring the unity Republicans need.
«That would be the biggest motivating factor in another reconciliation bill,» the lawmaker said.

Chairman Rep. Jodey Arrington speaks at a news conference after the House narrowly passed a bill forwarding President Donald Trump’s agenda at the U.S. Capitol in Washington on May 22, 2025. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
And Pfluger pointed out that there was precedent — Democrats passed two reconciliation bills themselves when they last controlled Congress at the beginning of former President Joe Biden’s term.
«We should remind ourselves that they stuck together, and they were able to do that. So should we,» he said.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
But Arrington warned that lawmakers would have to move fast for something to be attainable.
«The window is closing, and I don’t see us being able to do a reconciliation bill if we get past the spring, because we’ll be too close to the election,» Arrington said.
house of representatives politics,politics,spending,war with iran
INTERNACIONAL
Panorama Internacional: Guerra contra Irán ¿China y Rusia al rescate… de Trump?
CHIMENTOS2 días agoMuni Seligmann respondió las críticas tras el accidente de su bebé y su viaje a Miami: “Hay que contarlo y naturalizarlo”
CHIMENTOS21 horas agoEl ex novio de Luana de Gran Hermano reveló información sensible sobre su relación: “El bolso tenía plata”
POLITICA3 días agoManuel Adorni explicó por qué viajó con su esposa en el avión presidencial a la gira del Gobierno en Nueva York


















