Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Legal experts react to Trump’s SCOTUS clash and tariff pivot in fiery SOTU

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Legal experts and commentators toed a careful line Wednesday in responding to President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address, with many using the moment to weigh in on the broader legal and political climate itself, rather than Trump’s actual remarks.

Advertisement

Some of the biggest moments of Trump’s address included his response to the Supreme Court’s 6–3 ruling that invalidated his use of a 1977 emergency law to impose tariffs on most U.S. trading partners, as well as his administration’s crackdown on violent crime in major U.S. cities, among other things.

«This is the golden age of America,» Trump proclaimed Tuesday night. «And you’ve seen nothing yet. We’re going to do better, and better, and better.» 

Trump struck a notably measured tone in responding to the Supreme Court’s tariff ruling during the State of the Union, briefly describing the 6–3 majority decision as «unfortunate» before pivoting to highlight the 10% import fees his administration had announced shortly after the high court’s ruling under Section 122 of the U.S. Trade Act of 1974.

Advertisement

«Countries that were ripping us off for decades are now paying us hundreds of billions of dollars,» Trump said of the tariffs, which he previously described as «life or death» for the nation’s economy. 

Four of the nine Supreme Court justices present for the State of the Union, including Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Elena Kagan and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who had ruled against Trump’s use of IEEPA to enact his tariffs.  ( Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

«The good news is that almost all countries and corporations want to keep the deal that they already made» with the U.S., Trump said Tuesday night, «knowing that the legal power that I as president have to make a new deal could be far worse for them.» 

Advertisement

«Therefore, they will continue to work along the same successful path that we had negotiated before the Supreme Court’s unfortunate involvement,» he added. 

Four of the nine Supreme Court justices present for the State of the Union, including Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Elena Kagan and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who had ruled against Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, to unilaterally enact his tariffs. 

Trump’s comments marked a shift from his more abrasive tone in the immediate aftermath of the tariff decision, when he said the high court was «incompetent» and that the majority should be «absolutely ashamed» of themselves «for not having the courage to do what’s right for our country.»

Advertisement

TRUMP TAKES DIRECT SOTU SWIPE AT DEMOCRATS OVER TAXES: ‘TO HURT THE PEOPLE’

President Donald Trump signs a document in the Oval Office.

Legal experts and commentators toed a careful line Wednesday in responding to President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address.  (Bonnie Cash/UPI/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Trump’s remarks during the State of the Union were a nod to his new tariffs he invoked under Section 122, or a statute that allows a sitting president to impose sweeping tariffs for up to 150 days in response to either large or serious U.S. «balance-of-payments deficits,» or in response to situations that pose «fundamental international payments problems» for the U.S. Congress can extend them once the 150-day period ends. 

But some experts have questioned the legality of using Section 122 to invoke the broad global tariffs — signaling what could be more legal challenges to come. 

Advertisement

Gita Gopinath, Harvard economics professor and former senior International Monetary Fund official, noted on social media: «As long as there is plenty of demand for US debt and equities, which is the case, the US does not have a ‘payments’ problem. It can finance its trade deficits easily.» 

«The first thing to note is that the statute does not apply to the current US international payments position,» the Peterson Institute’s Kimberly Clausing and Maurice Obstfeld said Monday. «Indeed, the president’s own lawyers argued in the IEEPA case that Section 122 was no substitute for IEEPA, since balance of payment deficits are conceptually distinct from the current account and trade deficits that Trump has characterized as an emergency.» 

Separately, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., vowed that his caucus would not approve Trump’s bid to extend tariffs beyond the 150-day period. 

Advertisement

«We will not extend those tariffs,» Schumer declared, urging Republicans to join Democrats in blocking them.

Schumer linked the tariffs to higher costs of groceries, cars, and homes. 

«Americans are suffering, because (Trump) is raising tariffs,» Schumer said. 

Advertisement

Trump also used his remarks to tout the significant drop-off in violent crime during his first year back in the White House, reiterating his administration’s claim that the U.S. murder rate dropped to its lowest point in 125 years in 2025. 

FROM GRIEF TO GOLD MEDALS, TRUMP’S SOTU GUEST LIST TELLS A BIGGER STORY

U.S. President Donald J. Trump delivers the State of the Union

President Donald J. Trump delivers the first State of the Union address of his second term to a joint session of Congress. (Kenny Holston /Pool via Reuters)

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt previously pointed Fox News Digital and other outlets to recent data from the Council on Criminal Justice that she said shows that Trump is «delivering overwhelmingly on his promise» to restore law and order in the U.S.

Advertisement

«A study from the Council on Criminal Justice shows that the murder rate across America’s largest cities plummeted in 2025 to its lowest level since at least 1900,» Leavitt told reporters. «Let me repeat to put this in perspective, this marks the largest single-year drop in murders in recorded history.» 

Nationwide homicide data released later in 2026 could show killings in 2025 falling to roughly 4.0 per 100,000 residents – the lowest rate ever recorded in law enforcement or public health data dating back to 1900 and the largest single-year percentage drop on record.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Advertisement

Reactions to the speech — and Trump’s policies — vary, but the president did win some praise from across the aisle.

«As a voter, I may not like him. I may find his long form exhausting. But when he speaks, he never wavers from American exceptionalism,» Michael Ceraso, a Democratic strategist with a background in speechwriting, told Fox News Digital.

«I see someone protecting our cities against those he deems a threat to democracy, revving up the economy, managing global partners, and defeating terrorism.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Charlie Creitz, Emma Colton and Michael Ruiz contributed to this report.

Related Article

Supreme Court blocks Trump tariffs in major test of executive branch powers

donald trump,politics,supreme court,national security,economy,congress

INTERNACIONAL

Fue una de las mentes maestras de Los Simpson, ganó millones y donó su fortuna para salvar animales

Published

on


Sam Simon destinó la mayor parte de su fortuna de Los Simpson a la protección de animales a través de una fundación benéfica (Michael Brian)

La serie animada Los Simpson, creada en 1989, fue un fenómeno global que cambió la industria del entretenimiento y se convirtió en una de las producciones televisivas más influyentes de la historia. Detrás de este éxito estuvo Sam Simon, quien transformó esta conquista mediática en una fortuna personal que superó los cien millones de dólares.

Su nombre trascendió el ámbito televisivo cuando, tras recibir un diagnóstico terminal, tomó una decisión radical: destinar la mayor parte de su riqueza a la protección de los animales, una causa que marcó el tramo final de su vida y definió su legado.

Advertisement

Con el impacto de Los Simpson, Sam Simon alcanzó una posición económica que le permitió ir mucho más allá de sus necesidades personales. De acuerdo con SensaCine, plataforma informativa sobre cine y series, Simon fue capaz de pagar a sus exesposas con generosidad y, además, ser solidario con los animales.

En el año 2000, Simon se unió a PETA, organización internacional de defensa animal, donde comenzó a involucrarse de manera activa en la protección de especies vulnerables. Dos años después, fundó la Sam Simon Foundation, a la que destinó millones de dólares anualmente.

El creador de Los Simpson
El creador de Los Simpson dejó instrucciones precisas para el cuidado y bienestar de su perro con necesidades médicas especiales (Vanity Fair)

La fundación, con sede en California, brindaba asistencia médica y cirugías complejas a perros y gatos abandonados, ofrecía refugio gratuito para animales rescatados y entrenaba perros de asistencia para personas con necesidades especiales.

Simon explicó en ocasiones que su objetivo era proporcionar ayuda médica a perros y gatos abandonados, así como costear operaciones quirúrgicas, según consignó SensaCine. Estas acciones, mantenidas en el tiempo, consolidaron su figura como un benefactor genuino dentro de la comunidad defensora de animales.

Advertisement

En 2012, la vida de Sam Simon cambió drásticamente al recibir un diagnóstico de cáncer de colon avanzado. Al entender que tenía los días contados, decidió legar la mayor parte de su fortuna a la Sam Simon Foundation. SensaCine detalla que Simon peleó duramente por mantener su fundación, dándole prácticamente todo cuando descubrió que iba a morir.

Antes de fallecer, Simon destinó más de USD 100 millones a la Sam Simon Foundation, garantizando la continuidad de programas de rescate, atención veterinaria y entrenamiento de perros de asistencia tras su muerte. Esta decisión sentó un precedente en términos de filantropía en Hollywood y aseguró un futuro para incontables animales vulnerables.

Diagnosticado con cáncer terminal, el
Diagnosticado con cáncer terminal, el guionista donó gran parte de su patrimonio a la Sam Simon Foundation, apostando por el bienestar de perros y gatos hasta el final

El legado de Simon también contempló instrucciones claras sobre el futuro de sus propios animales. En particular, dejó estipulado el cuidado de su perro con necesidades médicas especiales, encomendando su bienestar a Tyson Kilmer, un reconocido entrenador de perros en la industria del entretenimiento.

Simon prometió que Kilmer recibiría USD 140.000 anuales para cubrir los gastos médicos del animal, un acuerdo que debió ser defendido judicialmente ante los administradores de la herencia y que reflejó el empeño de Simon por que sus recursos alcanzaran a los más necesitados incluso después de su partida.

Advertisement

Las iniciativas financiadas por la Sam Simon Foundation se expandieron más allá de la atención directa a perros y gatos. Con el paso de los años, la organización diversificó su alcance y apoyó campañas de concientización, servicios veterinarios móviles y programas de adopción responsable. SensaCine da cuenta de que la fundación proporcionó un refugio para muchos perros atendidos sin coste, incluyendo el rescate de animales que estaban destinados a ser sacrificados. Gracias al compromiso financiero de Simon, la fundación mantuvo una acción constante en defensa de miles de animales en situaciones críticas.

El caso de Sam Simon es un ejemplo entre figuras públicas que deciden canalizar su posición y recursos hacia la transformación de otras realidades. Mientras varios de sus colegas en la industria eligieron inversiones personales o filantropía diversa, Simon encaminó una causa concreta y la mantuvo hasta el último momento de su vida.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

DHS says ICE agents will not be at polling places during midterms

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

An official with the Department of Homeland Security told state election officials Wednesday that federal immigration agents will not be stationed at polling locations during the November midterm elections, as some Democrats have warned the Trump administration could attempt to interfere in the elections through intimidation or racial profiling.

Advertisement

Heather Honey, DHS’ deputy assistant secretary for election integrity, told secretaries of state on a call that «any suggestion that ICE will be present at any polling location is simply not true,» according to Arizona’s Democrat Secretary of State Adrian Fontes.

A spokeswoman for Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read, also a Democrat, said Honey likewise assured officials that immigration agents would not be stationed at polling locations. Kentucky Secretary of State Michael Adams, a Republican, also posted on X that DHS «confirms to Secretaries of State that ICE agents will not be at voting locations this year.»

Honey, who has previously endorsed claims that President Donald Trump won the 2020 election against former President Joe Biden, participated in the call, which also included representatives of the FBI, US Election Assistance Commission, Postal Service and other federal agencies to discuss coordination ahead of the midterms.

Advertisement

An official with the Department of Homeland Security told state election officials that federal immigration agents will not be at the polls during the midterm elections. (Ryan Murphy/Getty Images)

Fox News Digital has reached out to DHS for comment.

This comes as several Democrats have expressed concern that immigration agents may be placed at polling locations to intimidate Americans who fear they could be racially profiled and targeted if they show up to vote.

Advertisement

«I’m talking about something that I think would be extraordinary in American history, which is uniformed and masked ICE agents encircling polling places,» Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., said at a recent congressional hearing. «And it’s not fantasy, and it’s not made up. We need to be clear-eyed about that. These are things that the president and his cabinet have suggested.»

The Department of Justice has been filing lawsuits seeking detailed voter data, though the department has not publicly detailed its specific rationale for each request.

Trump has also renewed his claims that there was widespread fraud in the 2020 election, claims that have been widely disputed and rejected by courts, and has called on administration officials to investigate that election.

Advertisement
A voting booth

Democrats have expressed concern that immigration agents may be placed at polling locations to intimidate American voters. (Paul Richards/AFP via Getty Images)

Earlier this month, the FBI executed a search warrant at an election office in Fulton County, Georgia, seizing ballots and other voting records from 2020, according to local officials. A Democratic stronghold, Fulton County includes Atlanta. The Peach State went to Biden in 2020, but Trump carried the state in 2024.

Democratic officials and public interest lawyers across the country have been concerned for months about the possibility of Trump’s interference in the midterms voting and ballot counting.

Democrats have pointed out that Trump was willing to attempt to overturn his 2020 election loss, pardoned those involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and has filled his administration with allies who backed his attempts to overturn the election defeat.

Advertisement

The U.S. Constitution affirms that states run elections, not federal officials. Most states have their Secretary of State oversee elections.

NOEM BACKS SAVE AMERICA ACT, SLAMS ‘RADICAL LEFT’ OPPOSITION TO VOTER IDS AND PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP

President Donald Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at roundtable event

Democratic officials and public interest lawyers across the country have been concerned for months about the possibility of President Donald Trump’s interference in the midterms. (Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Participants on the call said Democrat secretaries of state asked Honey several questions about the administration’s cuts to election security funding and its efforts to root out noncitizen voting, which is already illegal and rare, as well as concerns about federal law enforcement officers appearing at polling places.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The White House has dismissed those concerns, saying there was no disruption during last year’s election when Democrats performed well.

During a congressional hearing earlier this month, Acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Todd Lyons and Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott both said they were not involved in any efforts to patrol voting places.

Advertisement

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Related Article

Schumer says Dems will fight voter ID push 'tooth and nail,' balks at DHS role in elections

elections,midterm elections,immigration,homeland security,politics,donald trump,kristi noem

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Kim Jong Un calls South Korea ‘most hostile enemy,’ says North could ‘completely destroy’ it

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un said Thursday that his country could «completely destroy» South Korea if it feels threatened, escalating rhetoric while ruling out renewed talks.

Advertisement

Speaking at North Korea’s week-long Ninth Congress of the ruling Workers’ Party in Pyongyang, Kim labeled South Korea the «most hostile enemy» and said «the conciliatory attitude that South Korea’s current government advocates on the surface is clumsily deceptive and crude,» according to state media Korean Central News Agency (KCNA).

Kim said North Korea «can initiate arbitrary action» if South Korea engages in «obnoxious behavior» directed at his country, dismissing recent efforts by Seoul to improve relations.

«South Korea’s complete collapse cannot be ruled out,» Kim said, according to KCNA.

Advertisement

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un spoke during the Ninth Congress of the ruling Workers’ Party in Pyongyang on Feb. 23, 2026. ( Korean Central News Agency via REUTERS)

During the congress, Kim outlined sweeping five-year policy goals centered on expanding North Korea’s nuclear arsenal. The country is believed to possess around 50 warheads and enough fissile material to produce up to 40 more, according to an estimate last year from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

The North Korean leader said the country’s «international status has risen extraordinarily.»

Advertisement

«It is our party’s firm will to further expand and strengthen our national nuclear power, and thoroughly exercise its status as a nuclear state,» Kim said, according to KCNA. «We will focus on projects to increase the number of nuclear weapons and expand nuclear operational means.»

NORTH KOREA RELEASES IMAGES OF DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR-POWERED SUBMARINE

North Korea ruling Workers' Party re-elects Kim Jong Un as general secretary

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un was re-elected as general secretary during the Ninth Congress of the Workers’ Party of Korea (WPK) in Pyongyang, North Korea, Feb. 22, 2026. (Korean Central News Agency via REUTERS )

Kim laid out plans for North Korea to develop more advanced intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of underwater launches, along with artificial intelligence-driven weapons systems and unmanned drones, KCNA reported.

Advertisement

Kim, who met with President Donald Trump three times during Trump’s first term, signaled he may be open to future negotiations with Washington but placed responsibility squarely on the United States.

«Whether it’s peaceful coexistence or permanent confrontation, we are ready for either, and the choice is not ours to make,» he said.

NORTH KOREAN LEADER KIM JONG UN’S DAUGHTER SEEN AS FUTURE SUCCESSOR: SPY AGENCY

Advertisement
Kim Jong Un and daughter Ju Ae

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and his daughter Kim Ju Ae attended an event to celebrate the New Year, in Pyongyang, North Korea. (KCNA via Reuters)

Kim said that if the U.S «withdraws its policy of confrontation» with North Korea and acknowledges the country’s «current status,» there would be «no reason why we cannot get along well with the U.S.»

Following the congress, Kim’s teenage daughter attended a military parade in Pyongyang on Wednesday, according to KCNA. Ju Ae, believed to be 13 or 14, was photographed standing beside her father and senior military leaders.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Her appearance comes after South Korean media reported that Kim recently gave her a leadership role in the regime’s powerful «Missile Administration,» which oversees Pyongyang’s nuclear forces.

Fox News Digital’s Emma Bussey, along with Reuters and the Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Related Article

Trump says he'd be willing to extend Asia trip to meet with North Korea's Kim Jong Un



north korea,south korea,kim jong un,conflicts,nuclear proliferation

Continue Reading

Tendencias