Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Travis County DA faces renewed ‘soft on crime’ criticism after career criminal charged with murder

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Texas-based career criminal with a lengthy rap sheet is behind bars in Travis County after he was charged with murdering a father of five outside a 7-Eleven in Austin, reviving scrutiny of Travis County District Attorney José Garza and what critics call his controversial prosecutorial record and «soft on crime» approach.

Advertisement

Caleb Anthony Jenkins, described by police as a career criminal, was charged with murder in connection with a shooting last year that left a 25-year-old father dead outside a 7-Eleven. According to Austin police, Jenkins allegedly shot the victim and drove off.

But critics argue the killing may have been preventable. Garza’s office previously dismissed or declined to prosecute three separate gun charges against Jenkins in incidents dating back to 2022. He was also arrested in 2023 on a domestic violence charge and failed to appear in court, as Fox News reported. Most recently, he was re-arrested and released after his bond was raised.

Taken together, the developments have intensified public criticism of Garza, the Democratic district attorney backed by liberal mega-donor George Soros,

Advertisement

District Attorney Jose Garza in Austin, Texas.  ((Photo by Spencer Selvidge for The Washington Post via Getty Images))

Garza, who was elected Travis County DA without prior experience as a prosecutor, has faced criticism from police advocacy groups and victims’ families since taking office. They have accused him of deliberately slow-walking certain cases and embracing lenient sentencing policies.

The criticism has sparked national attention in years past. In 2023, the family of 25-year-old Doug Cantor, who was shot and killed in the 2021 Sixth Street mass shooting in downtown Austin, criticized Garza for slow-walking the trial of the gunman.

Advertisement

Family members told Fox News Digital in an interview at the time that they believed Garza had put the case on the «back burner.»

«It’s very clear that his focus and attention is not on this case,» Nick Kantor told Fox News Digital in an interview reflecting on the two-year anniversary of his brother’s death — and the way Garza, who has been widely criticized for soft-on-crime policies, has handled the case.

AUSTIN DA GARZA CREATES CONFUSION WITH ANNOUNCEMENT OF IMPENDING INDICTMENTS AGAINST MULTIPLE POLICE OFFICERS

Advertisement
Richard Leigh Bell Mugshot

Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza poses in front of the Austin skyline in a portrait from the county website. Garza has faced criticism for accusations that he aggressively prosecutes police officers accused of wrongdoing while going easy on career criminals. (Travis County DA Website)

«He’s doing things that are clearly causing distress on the trial and on the overall outcome of the case and for getting justice for my brother,» Kantor said. 

Other victims’ families cited similar behavior from Garza’s office in interviews with Fox News Digital. 

While overall reported crime in Travis County has declined, opponents argue dismissal rates have been «political,» and could further endanger public safety.

Advertisement

It «appears that Garza has now become more of an advocate for the criminal than he has for the victim,» Dennis Farris, president of the Austin Police Retired Officer’s Association, previously told Fox News Digital.

«The prosecution is acting more like defense attorneys than they are prosecutors,» Farris said in an interview roughly one year after Garza took office. «Whatever his skewed view of what criminal justice reform is, it isn’t working. It sure isn’t working for the victims.» 

CRIME EXPERTS RESPOND TO SOROS DEFENDING SUPPORT FOR PROGRESSIVE DAS AMID CRIME WAVE: ‘DISASTROUS’

Advertisement
George Soros

U.S. investor, philanthropist George Soros delivers a speech on the sidelines of the 2022 World Economic Forum in Davos. (FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP via Getty Images)

«It used to be that they got the victims’ buy-in before offering plea bargains. Now it doesn’t appear he’s even doing that, because they’re not even communicating with them, and that’s what’s leading to the revictimization of these families.» 

Current and former local law enforcement officers have criticized Garza’s actions and his alleged «war on cops,» after the Soros-backed district attorney campaigned on indicting police officers and «reimagining» policing in Austin.

Soros contributed $652,000 to the Texas Justice & Public Safety PAC in the months leading up to the 2020 Travis County DA election, according to campaign finance records.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

That same PAC spent almost $1 million on digital and mail advertisements to help Garza’s campaign, as Fox News reported.

The Travis County District Attorney’s Office did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

Advertisement

Related Article

Austin crime watchdog calls on DA Garza to step aside in case against 19 indicted officers

politics,donald trump,crime world,midterm elections,federal judges,texas,immigration,national security

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Cómo las noticias falsas e imágenes creadas con IA multiplicaron el pánico tras la muerte del capo más poderoso de México

Published

on


Cuando comenzaron los bloqueos, los incendios y las acciones armadas tras la muerte del líder del Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG), el capo más poderoso de México, la gente corrió a un solo lugar para averiguar qué pasaba: las redes sociales. Y lo que encontraron fue un país sumido en la violencia y el caos más absoluto.

Eso era cierto… pero no del todo.

Advertisement

La operación para capturar a Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, “El Mencho”, conllevó fuertes enfrentamientos entre militares y delincuentes y desencadenó una ola de represalias por parte del cártel en 20 estados. Más de 70 personas perdieron la vida —la mayoría delincuentes y fuerzas de seguridad— solo el domingo.

Pero además de los relatos reales y las advertencias de los gobiernos locales y extranjeros a sus ciudadanos para que no salieran de sus casas, también se difundió mucha desinformación en redes, parte elaborada con inteligencia artificial, destinada a amplificar el caos, la confusión y la desesperación.

“No sabía qué era cierto y qué era falso”, dice Victoria Elizabeth Peceril, de 31 años, mientras camina con sus tres hijos por una calle de Guadalajara, que ya había vuelto casi a la normalidad. “Tuvimos mucho miedo”.

Advertisement

Sembrar el pánico

Entre la información falsa, se viralizaron videos del aeropuerto de Guadalajara —capital de Jalisco y segunda ciudad del país— supuestamente tomado por hombres armados y que mostraban estampidas de pasajeros o un avión incendiado en una de sus pistas. También hubo publicaciones que aseguraban que el cártel había tomado como rehenes a turistas estadounidenses en carreteras y hoteles.

El gobierno mexicano denunció el miércoles que se habían identificado entre 200 y 500 publicaciones con información falsa. Entre 20 y 30 de esos contenidos superaron las 100.000 visualizaciones.

Estos datos, presentados durante la conferencia presidencial, se basaban en un estudio realizado por el Tecnológico de Monterrey. El análisis de esta universidad privada indicaba que entre el 35 y el 40% de esa desinformación ofrecía datos fuera de contexto, más de la cuarta parte tenía información engañosa y en torno a otra cuarta parte tenía contenido manipulado con inteligencia artificial o inventado de una u otra manera.

Una publicación hablaba de cómo un agente estadounidense supuestamente había estrangulado a “El Mencho”. Otra decía que la presidenta Claudia Sheinbaum había sido resguardada en un buque de la Marina en el Pacífico.

Advertisement

No faltaron “teorías de conspiración” que vinculaban la muerte del capo a la captura el 3 de enero del entonces presidente venezolano Nicolás Maduro o especulaban con que el gobierno mexicano lo había matado para no entregarlo a Estados Unidos, explica el documento del Tecnológico, que cita verificaciones realizadas por su equipo, por The Associated Press y otros medios de comunicación.

La universidad no dijo quién pudo producir todo ese contenido. Tampoco el gobierno.

Advertisement

“Hubo muchas noticias con muy mala intención el domingo, buscando generar terror”, había comentado el martes la presidenta.

Violencia brutal, seña de identidad del CJNG

Muchos mexicanos, sobre todo en ciudades de gran actividad de los cárteles, han tenido que acostumbrarse a la fuerza a revisar la situación de la seguridad en chats, aplicaciones o cuentas de X antes de salir de casa o subirse al auto porque ahí encuentran información ciudadana que no hallan en otras partes y que es la única pista para evitar sitios donde han sido vistos hombres armados o se han reportado incidentes.

Advertisement

El hecho de que el cártel de Jalisco se haya ganado una reputación de sanguinario por sus espectaculares ataques, como derribar un helicóptero militar o el intento de asesinato del actual secretario de Seguridad cuando era el jefe de la policía de Ciudad de México, hizo que cualquier información divulgada en domingo pareciera posible.

“De primeras nos creíamos todo”, comentó Nicolás Martín, un español de 28 años que se quedó varado con 13 amigos en un resort al norte de Puerto Vallarta, en el Pacífico, del que nadie pudo salir o entrar en dos días.

Según explicó vía telefónica el miércoles, mientras se dirigía al aeropuerto para finalmente regresar a su casa en Ciudad de México, era como ver en redes “lo que has visto en las películas” aunque consciente de que los cárteles mexicanos ya habían reaccionado muy violentamente en el pasado al verse acosados por las autoridades.

Advertisement

Sin embargo, para alguien como Martín, acostumbrado a navegar por las redes sociales, las primeras imágenes que mostraban Puerto Vallarta en llamas le sorprendieron por su calidad y porque parecían tomadas desde un dron cuando lo que uno espera en los primeros momentos de confusión son videos atropellados y de mala calidad de ciudadanos en pánico.

Criminales “expertos en tecnología”

Vanda Felbab-Brown, experta en crimen organizado de la Brookings Institution, consideró que hubo señales que apuntaban a que algunas de las publicaciones pudieron ser creadas por personas afines al CJNG porque estos grupos han invertido mucho en estar presentes en redes. “Los criminales se han convertido en grandes expertos en tecnología”, indicó.

Advertisement

“Fue impresionante el nivel de desinformación”, agregó la investigadora. “Las imágenes del aeropuerto bajo ataque… algunos chatbots haciendo imágenes de inteligencia artificial para Jalisco Nueva Generación han sido impresionantes, sofisticadas y sin duda agregó un halo de caos y debacle”.

Aunque algunas autoridades tanto mexicanas como la embajada de Estados Unidos, comenzaron a desmentir informaciones el mismo domingo, Sarai Olguín, una universitaria de 22 años de Guadalajara, dijo que ese día era difícil distinguir la realidad de la ficción con la mayor parte de la ciudad encerrada y en un país donde existe una gran desconfianza hacia el gobierno.

Olguín estuvo recibiendo información de amigos que compartían vídeos y fotos que habían visto en internet y recuerda advertencias que decían que después de cierta hora, iban a matar a todos los que estuvieran en la calle.

Advertisement

El miércoles, reconocía que la costó creer que “El Mencho” hubiera muerto de verdad, pero dijo que la desinformación tuvo una parte positiva. “Todas estas noticias falsas ayudaron a cuidar (a la gente), aunque sembraron un miedo inmenso”.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Biden-appointed judge who slapped down Trump deportation policy previously rebuked by SCOTUS

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A federal judge appointed by former President Joe Biden on Thursday again ruled against the Trump administration’s third-country deportation policy, months after the Supreme Court blocked his earlier decision and rebuked him in a rare follow-up order.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court not only stayed Boston-based Judge Brian Murphy’s injunction over the same deportation policy in a 6-3 order last June, but the high court followed up with a second 7-2 order a week later admonishing the judge for flouting its decision. Murphy’s latest ruling is also likely to land before the justices, setting up a fresh test of the judge’s decisions in the high-stakes case.

Murphy, who was confirmed by the Senate along party lines, had issued a sweeping 81-page decision on Thursday finding that the Department of Homeland Security’s process for deporting migrants to third countries (countries that are not specified in the migrants’ removal orders) was unlawful because it violated the migrants’ due process by not giving them enough time to raise fears that they could be tortured in the country they are sent to.

Judge Brian E. Murphy speaks at his Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on April 17, 2024. (U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary)

Advertisement

Murphy’s decision came after the judge last year issued a preliminary injunction that also blocked DHS from deporting migrants to third countries under the department’s current protocols. The Supreme Court’s order in June halted that decision, but, pointing to a technicality, Murphy said that a separate subsequent ruling he made on May 21 specifically addressing six migrants bound for South Sudan was still «in full force and effect» despite the high court’s stay.

The judge’s move led the Department of Justice to ask the Supreme Court for clarification, and the high court responded by issuing its follow-up 7-2 opinion saying Murphy could not block DHS from deporting the six migrants.

«Our June 23 order stayed the April 18 preliminary injunction in full. The May 21 remedial order cannot now be used to enforce an injunction that our stay rendered unenforceable,» the Supreme Court’s majority wrote.

Advertisement

In an unusual move, the majority also noted that if the government needed further help to stop Murphy’s interference, it could seek a writ of mandamus, a rare legal tool used by a higher court to force a lower court judge to follow the law.

Secretary Kristi Noem

Department of Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem (Getty Images/Alex Brandon)

The high court said it expected Murphy to «now conform [his] order to our previous stay and cease enforcing the April 18 injunction through the May 21 remedial order.»

Justice Elena Kagan, an Obama appointee who agreed with Murphy’s initial decision to block the deportations, sided with the majority in agreeing that the judge had acted defiantly.

Advertisement

«I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this Court has stayed,» Kagan wrote in a concurring opinion.

FEDERAL JUDGE RULES AGAINST DHS ON WARRANTLESS IMMIGRATION ARRESTS IN OREGON

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan participates in taking a new family photo with her fellow justices at the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 1, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst - RC17E9C01E10

Justice Elena Kagan joined the Supreme Court in 2010 after being nominated by former President Barack Obama. (Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)

The DOJ had fumed over Murphy’s attempt to block the deportation of the six migrants. Solicitor General John Sauer described it as a «lawless act of defiance» of the Supreme Court’s authority when seeking clarification from the high court.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«For over two months now, the Executive has labored under an injunction that this Court yesterday deemed unenforceable,» Sauer wrote. «This Court should immediately make clear that the district court’s enforcement order has no effect, and put a swift end to the ongoing irreparable harm to the Executive Branch and its agents, who remain under baseless threat of contempt as they are forced to house dangerous criminal aliens at a military base in the Horn of Africa that now lies on the borders of a regional conflict.»

Murphy said in his ruling Thursday that DHS’s deportation policy was «not fine nor is it legal.» During the prior administration, when Murphy was appointed to the federal bench, Biden sought to undo Trump’s strict immigration policies, leading to nearly 10 million migrant encounters at the southern border. Biden also faced criticism for lax policies that involved releasing millions of migrants into the country during his tenure while they awaited immigration hearings. Border encounters have dropped dramatically since Trump retook office.

Advertisement

Murphy stayed his ruling for 15 days to give the Trump administration time to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, given what the judge acknowledged was the «importance» and «unusual history» of the case.

Fox News Digital’s Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report. 

Advertisement

Related Article

DOJ says it owes deported Venezuelans no due process, dares courts to intervene

supreme court,judiciary,immigration,deportation,justice department

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Iran rejects Trump demands despite ‘significant progress’ in nuclear talks

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Talks between Iran and the U.S. wrapped up in Geneva Thursday as officials cited «significant progress» and announced a next meeting set for Vienna within days.

Advertisement

Yet despite senior U.S. officials describing the third round as «positive,» per Axios, Iranian state television also reported that Tehran will continue enriching uranium and rejected proposals to transfer it abroad.

According to The Associated Press , the reports claimed Iran would also push for the lifting of international sanctions — signaling it is not prepared to meet President Donald Trump’s demands.

The negotiations were carried out primarily indirectly, with Omani Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi relaying messages between the two sides.

Advertisement

Oman’s Foreign Affairs’ Minister Badr bin Hamad al-Busaidi gives a thumbs up as he leaves his hotel to reach Oman’s ambassador residency for new round of talks between the United States and Iran to address Iran’s nuclear program. (Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP via Getty Images)

In a post on X, al-Busaidi confirmed that the round had concluded and said discussions would resume soon.

«We have finished the day after significant progress in the negotiation between the United States and Iran,» he said on X.

Advertisement

«We will resume soon after consultation in the respective capitals. Discussions on a technical level will take place next week in Vienna. I am grateful to all concerned for their efforts: the negotiators, the IAEA, and our hosts, the Swiss government,» al-Busaidi said.

There was no immediate public statement from U.S. or Iranian officials after the session.

LEAVITT SAYS TRUMP CHOOSES DIPLOMACY FIRST FOR IRAN, BUT REMAINS ‘WILLING TO USE’ LETHAL FORCE IF NECESSARY

Advertisement
Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, and Sayyid Badr Al Busaidi seated at a round table.

Special envoy Steve Witkoff (C) and Jared Kushner (L) meet with Oman’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Sayyid Badr bin Hamad Albusaidi (R) in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss ongoing diplomatic negotiations on Thursday, Feb. 26, 2026. (Oman Ministry of Foreign Affairs/X)

Trump’s special Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, attended the three-hour negotiations with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi was also involved, with Iranian officials presenting a draft proposal for a potential nuclear agreement with the U.S., which has key demands.

Iran insists it has the right to enrich uranium and has appeared to refuse to negotiate over other issues, including its long-range missile program and support for armed groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

Advertisement

TRUMP ADMIN RAMPS UP ‘MAXIMUM PRESSURE’ IRAN SANCTIONS AHEAD OF NEW ROUND OF NUCLEAR TALKS

Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei pictured  sitting next to a senior military official in Iran. (Getty Images)

Trump, meanwhile, insists on a deal to curb Iran’s nuclear program. In his State of the Union address Feb. 24, the president said he prefers a diplomatic solution.

«My preference is to solve this problem through diplomacy, but one thing is certain: I will never allow the world’s number one sponsor of terror, which they are by far, to have a nuclear weapon,» the president said. «Can’t let that happen.»

Advertisement

As the Geneva talks unfolded Thursday, Ali Shamkhani, a senior adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, also wrote on X that if the main U.S. concern is preventing a nuclear weapon, that stance «aligns» with Khamenei’s fatwa and Iran’s defensive doctrine.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

He added that Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has «sufficient support and authority» to come to a final agreement in the talks.

Advertisement

The development came as the U.S. continues assembling military assets, including a fleet of aircraft and warships in the Middle East.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House for comment.

Advertisement

Related Article

Witkoff warns Iran is ‘a week away’ from 'bomb-making material' as Trump weighs action



iran,ali khamenei,middle east,sanctions,nuclear proliferation,donald trump

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias