Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Backlash grows after Clinton-appointed judge frees migrants over ICE agent masking

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Bill Clinton-appointed federal judge is among several drawing criticism for continuing to order the release of some of the 650 illegal immigrants arrested by ICE in Operation Country Roads.

Advertisement

In one case that drew public attention, Judge Joseph Goodwin of the Southern District of West Virginia granted the release of Salvadoran national Anderson Jesus Urquilla-Ramos, a decision the man’s attorney told Bloomberg Law «reinforces that immigration enforcement must operate within constitutional limits.»

In his order, Goodwin lashed out at ICE agents’ masks and warrant-free arrests, saying «antiseptic judicial rhetoric cannot do justice to what is happening.»

Goodwin characterized DHS’ behavior as an «assault on the constitutional order [and] what the Fourth Amendment was written to prevent,» according to WVMetroNews, and he permitted habeas corpus, a detained defendant’s ability to challenge his confinement.

Advertisement

ICE and DHS agents make an arrest.  (Mostafa Bassim/Getty Images)

In Goodwin’s order releasing Yuri Aroca and Arley Valenzuela, he lambasted their detention after a traffic stop along the West Virginia Turnpike near Pax, West Virginia.

«I am not blind to the practical demands of immigration enforcement, including cooperation between state and federal authorities, but the Constitution presupposed restraint as the default of lawful authority,» he wrote in his ruling.

Advertisement

Rep. Carol Miller, R-W.V., who represents the southern half of the state, did not hold back in her response to the situation.

«If Judge Goodwin experienced even 1% of the threats and harassment that ICE officers receive, he might have had the courage to make a ruling based on the law and not his personal political agenda,» Miller said.

«Thankfully, he, his family and his home are free from the fear of doxxing and danger coming from the radical leftists — our ICE agents are not as fortunate.»

Advertisement

Miller said masking protects ICE agents from those who want to harm them and keeps their families out of the «crosshairs of the mobs that continue to terrorize our cities.»

FEDERAL JUDGE STRIKES DOWN LARGE PARTS OF TRUMP MASS DETENTION POLICIES FOR MIGRANTS

carol-smith

Rep. Carol Miller, R-W.V.   (Bill Clark)

Operation Country Roads netted hundreds of illegal immigrants from Charles Town in the north to Beckley in the south, and many of the cases fall within the Charleston-based Southern District of West Virginia.

Advertisement

Moore Capito, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of West Virginia, defended the state’s partnership with federal law enforcement in comments to Fox News Digital.

«We in the Southern District of West Virginia have the most committed and cooperative law enforcement partners that you will find,» Capito said.

«Day after day, they are on the front lines working to keep our communities safe. Our officers take precautions to protect themselves and their families from retaliation, the same way members of the judiciary rely on institutional protections every day.»

Advertisement

Capito said his office will continue to support law enforcement while responding to several petitions, adding that the cases involving the now-released individuals are ripe for appeal.

In one of his orders, Goodwin wrote that «no specific danger has been identified that required these agents to be masked for this arrest,» a statement the White House took particular exception to.

«ICE officers are facing a 1,300% increase in assaults against them because of dangerous, untrue smears from elected Democrats,» spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

«ICE officers wear masks to protect themselves and their families from being doxxed. ICE officers act heroically to enforce the law and protect American communities with the utmost professionalism. Anyone pointing the finger at law enforcement officers instead of the criminals is simply doing the bidding of criminal illegal aliens.»

An Obama-appointed judge, Irene Berger, who also recently blunted a key tenet of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s «MAHA» agenda, ordered the similarly reasoned release of a noncitizen big rig driver detained at the Ghent Toll Plaza on the turnpike.

Rep. Riley Moore, R-W.V., who represents the northern half of the state, including Jefferson County, where local law enforcement collaborated with ICE to quickly remove suspects from the streets, agreed with Miller that judges should understand the dangers faced by agents.

Advertisement

«ICE agents are being doxxed, and their families are being attacked by radical leftists just for doing their jobs,» Moore told Fox News Digital.

«We’ve seen time and again what violent leftists are capable of, and our ICE agents should never be subjected to this terrible treatment.»

FEDERAL JUDGE RELEASES FOUR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS CONVICTED OF MURDER, SEX CRIMES FROM ICE CUSTODY

Advertisement

Moore called Goodwin’s ruling «shameful» and said it puts ideology above protecting American families.

«I am grateful to the brave ICE agents who are doing their duty to defend America,» he said. Gov. Patrick Morrisey shared the sentiment.

«We stand with President Trump, the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and we are confident that as these cases move through the justice system, the court will find that the protection and safety of federal agents is constitutional,» Morrisey told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

«We also stand firmly with ICE. The safety of law enforcement officers is paramount.»

Morrisey said that threats of doxxing, targeted harassment and violence are «very real.»

«There is a clear need to protect those who serve,» he said, disagreeing with the tact from the bench.

Advertisement

«These men and women put themselves in harm’s way to enforce the law, and we will always stand alongside our fellow officers.»

Some released individuals named President Donald Trump as a defendant, signaling the federal government would be the party to appeal. Others listed West Virginia corrections official Christopher Mason, ICE Director Todd Lyons and Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Asked about the cases and what next steps might be, a Justice Department spokesperson told Fox News Digital that concerns over agents’ tactics and masking have been «reaffirmed» through a recent California court case.

Advertisement

«Laws banning federal agents from wearing protective masks are unconstitutional,» the spokesperson said.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«This Department of Justice is focused on law and order, public safety, and will not tolerate any violence directed toward law enforcement officials working tirelessly to keep Americans safe, despite the best efforts of activist judges who’d rather see violent illegal criminals walk free.»  

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to the rest of West Virginia’s delegation — Sens. Jim Justice II and Shelley Moore Capito — for comment.

Related Article

Federal judge’s ‘unhinged’ order in migrant case ignites Republican fury, impeachment demand

police and law enforcement,immigration,federal judges,illegal immigrants,justice department,in court

INTERNACIONAL

Los archivos del fallido golpe de Estado de 1981 en España reivindican la figura del rey Juan Carlos: ¿Volverá a su país?

Published

on


El rey emérito Juan Carlos, autoexiliado en Abu Dhabi desde agosto de 2020 para no salpicar a la Corona con sus escándalos, no disimula su deseo de retornar a vivir en el reino ni esconde el fastidio que le provoca no poder dormir en el palacio de la Zarzuela cada vez que visita España. ¿Acaso está por volver?

Esta semana, la desclasificación de 168 documentos vinculados al intento fallido de golpe de Estado del 23 de febrero de 1981, cuando el Borbón llevaba menos de seis años en el trono, colocó en el centro del debate político y público cuál fue el verdadero rol del rey Juan Carlos ante el levantamiento militar que la memoria de los españoles resume en una postal: la del teniente coronel de la Guardia Civil Antonio Tejero a los tiros en el Congreso de Madrid.

Advertisement

Tejero murió esta semana, a los 93 años, el mismo día en el que el gobierno de Pedro Sánchez subió a la web del Palacio de la Moncloa informes, transcripciones de conversaciones y hasta un esquema dibujado a mano de cómo se estaba planeando el golpe.

La información desclasificada no incluye audios pero sí documentos en los que se transcribe lo que el rey Juan Carlos habría dicho y ordenado a los golpistas para aplacar el levantamiento.

Como “Cualquier golpe de Estado no podrá escudarse en el rey, es contra el rey” o “Ni abdicaré ni abandonaré España. Quien se subleve está dispuesto a provocar y será responsable de una nueva guerra civil”, frases con las que el monarca habría advertido a los golpistas en la madrugada de la intentona que fracasó.

Advertisement

La desclasificación de esos documentos reivindicó, en varios sectores de la sociedad española, la imagen de Juan Carlos, el rey que en sus comportamientos personales ejerció poco la ejemplaridad que se esperaba de la Corona y que en 2014 abdicó en favor de su hijo, el actual monarca Felipe VI.

Cruce político

“La desclasificación de los documentos del 23F debe reconciliar a los españoles con quien paró el golpe de Estado. Creo que sería deseable que el rey emérito regresara a España”, expresó Alberto Núñez Feijóo, presidente del conservador Partido Popular (PP).

Advertisement

“Él mismo ha reconocido errores innegables en su trayectoria, pero quien contribuyó a sostener nuestra democracia y nuestras libertades en un momento clave debiera pasar la última etapa de su vida con dignidad y en su país”, agregó el líder de la oposición.

El gobierno de coalición progresista de Sánchez se desmarcó de las palabras de Núñez Feijóo: “Es un asunto que le compete a él (el rey Juan Carlos) y a la Casa Real. Me sorprende esta salida de Feijóo que no se entiende a qué obedece”, dijo este viernes José Manuel Albares, ministro de Asuntos Exteriores.

“Depende del él -sumó el ministro de Justicia, Félix Bolaños-. El gobierno nunca le ha impedido ni le ha denegado la entrada a España.”

Advertisement

¿Regreso al país?

La Casa Real, que suele manejarse con una discreción a prueba de bala, hizo saber que la decisión de regresar al país es “personal” del emérito que, si desea mudarse nuevamente al reino, tendría que volver fijar su residencia legal y fiscal en España.

Desde agosto de 2020, Juan Carlos de Borbón es huésped de honor del jeque emiratí que jamás le pidió rendir cuentas ni pagar impuestos.

Advertisement

Para volver a casa, el rey emérito debería revelar su fortuna, qué ingresos recibe y tributar por ese capital.

El rey Juan Carlos de Borbón confrontó a los golpistas el 23 de febrero de 1981. Foto. AFP

Antes de que se marchara de España, y cuando los escándalos por posible evasión fiscal le llegaban al cuello, su hijo, el rey Felipe, renunció a toda herencia que procediera de Juan Carlos y le retiró la asignación económica como integrante de la familia real.

Quienes conocen bien de cerca al Borbón aseguran que él se siente al día luego de las dos regularizaciones fiscales que realizó a distancia y por las que pagó unos cinco millones de euros.

Su aspiración, además, es residir seis meses por año en su país, plazo máximo para evitar tener que pagar impuestos en España.

Advertisement

Y algo más: Juan Carlos pretende volver a vivir en el palacio de la Zarzuela, “su casa”.

Parece que en su entorno de Abu Dhabi nadie le explica claramente que el palacio es sede de la jefatura del Estado y que pertenece a Patrimonio Nacional, es decir, que se mantiene con los impuestos de los españoles, erogación que él mismo intentaría evitar si regresa a su país.

“Lo que ha dicho el señor Feijóo lo pensamos la inmensa mayoría de los españoles”, se sumó a la iniciativa del líder de su partido la presidenta de la Comunidad de Madrid, Isabel Díaz Ayuso.

Advertisement

“Los delincuentes mejor fuera”, opinó el vocero parlamentario del partido independentista catalán Esquerra Republicana de Cataluña, Gabriel Rufián.

Desde que Juan Carlos duerme fuera del reino de España existe un protocolo que podría activarse en caso de enfermedad o fallecimiento del rey emérito, que en enero cumplió 88 años.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump says he plans to order federal ban on Anthropic AI after company refuses Pentagon demands

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump on Friday said he was ordering every federal government agency to stop using Athropic AI immediately.

Advertisement

«THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS! That decision belongs to YOUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, and the tremendous leaders I appoint to run our Military,» Trump began in a lengthy Truth Social post Friday afternoon.

He added, «The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE trying to STRONG-ARM the Department of War, and force them to obey their Terms of Service instead of our Constitution. Their selfishness is putting AMERICAN LIVES at risk, our Troops in danger, and our National Security in JEOPARDY.»

The president said he would immediately direct every federal agency to stop using Anthropic technology.

Advertisement

Secretary of War for Public Affairs Sean Parnell speaks to the media. Earlier this week, Anthropic leadership refused demands from the Department of War to use its artificial intelligence for «all lawful purposes.» (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

«We don’t need it, we don’t want it, and will not do business with them again!» he continued.

There will be a six-month phase out period for agencies such as the Department of War, he added.

Advertisement

«Anthropic better get their act together, and be helpful during this phase out period, or I will use the Full Power of the Presidency to make them comply, with major civil and criminal consequences to follow,» he wrote.

He continued, «WE will decide the fate of our Country — NOT some out-of-control, Radical Left AI company run by people who have no idea what the real World is all about.»

Earlier this week, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei refused demands from the Department of War to use its artificial intelligence for «all lawful purposes,» but Amodei said no, concerned over the possibility it could be used for «mass domestic surveillance» or «fully autonomous weapons.»

Advertisement

TOP AI FIRM ALLEGES CHINESE LABS USED 24K FAKE ACCOUNTS TO SIPHON US TECH

Trump pointing

President Donald Trump on Friday said he was ordering every federal government agency to stop using Anthropic AI immediately. (Kenny Holston-Pool/Getty Images)

«The Department of War has stated they will only contract with AI companies who accede to ‘any lawful use’ and remove safeguards in the cases mentioned above. They have threatened to remove us from their systems if we maintain these safeguards; they have also threatened to designate us a ‘supply chain risk’ — a label reserved for US adversaries, never before applied to an American company — and to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards’ removal,» Amodei said in a Thursday statement.

He declared that the «threats do not change our position: we cannot in good conscience accede to their request.»

Advertisement

Assistant to the Secretary of War for Public Affairs Sean Parnell declared in a post on X that the department does not want to engage in either of those activities but is asking to use Anthropic’s AI for all legal purposes.

«The Department of War has no interest in using AI to conduct mass surveillance of Americans (which is illegal) nor do we want to use AI to develop autonomous weapons that operate without human involvement,» Parnell said in the post. «Here’s what we’re asking: Allow the Pentagon to use Anthropic’s model for all lawful purposes.»

«This is a simple, common-sense request that will prevent Anthropic from jeopardizing critical military operations and potentially putting our warfighters at risk. We will not let ANY company dictate the terms regarding how we make operational decisions. They have until 5:01 PM ET on Friday to decide. Otherwise, we will terminate our partnership with Anthropic and deem them a supply chain risk for DOW,» he noted.

Advertisement

PENTAGON TAPS MUSK’S XAI TO BOOST SENSITIVE GOVERNMENT WORKFLOWS, SUPPORT MILITARY OPERATIONS

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei

Anthropic Co-founder and CEO Dario Amodei declared this week that the «threats do not change our position: we cannot in good conscience accede to their request.» (Chance Yeh/Getty Images for HubSpot)

Under Secretary of War for Research and Engineering Emil Michael accused Anthropic and Amodei of lying.

In a post on X, Michael called Amodei «a liar» who «has a God-complex.» 

Advertisement

«He wants nothing more than to try to personally control the US Military and is ok putting our nation’s safety at risk. The @DeptofWar will ALWAYS adhere to the law but not bend to whims of any one for-profit tech company,» he asserted.

In another post he asserted, «Anthropic is lying. The @DeptofWar doesn’t do mass surveillance as that is already illegal. What we are talking about is allowing our warfighters to use AI without having to call @DarioAmodei for permission to shoot down an enemy drone swarms that would kill Americans.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«It is the Department’s prerogative to select contractors most aligned with their vision. But given the substantial value that Anthropic’s technology provides to our armed forces, we hope they reconsider,» Amodei said in a statement sent on Thursday to Fox News Digital. «Our strong preference is to continue to serve the Department and our warfighters — with our two requested safeguards in place. Should the Department choose to offboard Anthropic, we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider, avoiding any disruption to ongoing military planning, operations, or other critical missions. Our models will be available on the expansive terms we have proposed for as long as required.»

«We remain ready to continue our work to support the national security of the United States,» he added.

Fox News Digital’s Alex Nitzberg contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Related Article

Tech company refuses Pentagon demands on unrestricted use of its AI

politics,pentagon,donald trump,artificial intelligence,tech,technologies

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

UN Human Rights Council chief cuts off speaker criticizing US-sanctioned official

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) abruptly cut off a video statement after the speaker began criticizing several United Nations officials, including one who has been sanctioned by the Trump administration. The video message was being played during a U.N. session in Geneva, Switzerland, Friday morning.

Advertisement

Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the and president of Human Rights, called out several U.N. officials in her message, including U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk and special rapporteur Francesca Albanese, who is the subject of U.S. sanctions.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced sanctions against Albanese July 9, 2025, saying that she «has spewed unabashed antisemitism, expressed support for terrorism and open contempt for the United States, Israel and the West.»

«That bias has been apparent across the span of her career, including recommending that the ICC, without a legitimate basis, issue arrest warrants targeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant,» Rubio added.

Advertisement

Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Francesca Albanese  (Getty Images)

«I was the only American U.N.-accredited NGO with a speaking slot, and I wasn’t allowed even to conclude my 90 seconds of allotted time. Free speech is non-existent at the U.N. so-called ‘Human Rights Council,’» Bayefsky told Fox News Digital.

Bayefsky noted the irony of the council cutting off her video in a proceeding that was said to be an «interactive dialogue,» an event during which experts are allowed to speak to the council about human rights issues.

Advertisement

«I was cut off after naming Francesca Albanese, Navi Pillay and Chris Sidoti for covering up Palestinian use of rape as a weapon of war and trafficking in blatant antisemitism. I named the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Karim Khan, who is facing disturbing sexual assault allegations but still unaccountable almost two years later. Those are the people and the facts that the United Nations wants to protect and hide,» Bayefsky told Fox News Digital.

«It is an outrage that I am silenced and singled out for criticism on the basis of naming names.»

Bayefsky’s statement was cut off as she accused Albanese and Navi Pillay, the former chair of the U.N. Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory; and Chris Sidoti, a commissioner of the U.N. Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory. She also slammed Khan, who has faced rape allegations. Khan has denied the sexual misconduct allegations against him.

Advertisement

Had her video message been played in full, Bayefsky would have gone on to criticize Türk’s recent report for not demanding accountability for the atrocities committed by Hamas Oct. 7, 2023.

When the video was cut short, Human Rights Council President Ambassador Sidharto Reza Suryodipuro characterized Bayefsky’s remarks as «derogatory, insulting and inflammatory» and said that they were «not acceptable.»

«The language used by the speaker cannot be allowed as it has exceeded the limits of tolerance and respect within the framework of the council which we all in this room hold to,» Suryodipuro said.

Advertisement
UN Human Rights Council

The Human Rights Council at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, Feb. 26, 2025. (Denis Balibouse/Reuters)

MELANIA TRUMP TO TAKE THE GAVEL AT UN SECURITY COUNCIL IN HISTORIC FIRST

In response to Fox News Digital’s request for comment, Human Rights Council Media Officer Pascal Sim said the council has had long-established rules on what it considers to be acceptable language.

«Rulings regarding the form and language of interventions in the Human Rights Council are established practices that have been in place throughout the existence of the council and used by all council presidents when it comes to ensuring respect, tolerance and dignity inherent to the discussion of human rights issues,» Sim told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

When asked if the video had been reviewed ahead of time, Sim said it was assessed for length and audio quality to allow for interpretation, but that the speakers are ultimately «responsible for the content of their statement.»

«The video statement by the NGO ‘Touro Law Center, The Institute on Human Rights and The Holocaust’ was interrupted when it was deemed that the language exceeded the limits of tolerance and respect within the framework of the council and could not be tolerated,» Sim said.

«As the presiding officer explained at the time, all speakers are to remain within the appropriate framework and terminology used in the council’s work, which is well known by speakers who routinely participate in council proceedings. Following that ruling, none of the member states of the council have objected to it.»

Advertisement
United Nations

Flag alley at the United Nations’ European headquarters during the Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland, Sept. 11, 2023. (Denis Balibouse/File Photo/Reuters)

UNRWA OFFICIALS LOBBY CONGRESSIONAL STAFFERS AGAINST TRUMP TERRORIST DESIGNATION THREAT

While Bayefsky’s statement was cut off, other statements accusing Israel of genocide and ethnic cleansing were allowed to be played and read in full.

This is not the first time that Bayefsky was interrupted. Exactly one year ago, on Feb. 27, 2025, her video was cut off when she mentioned the fate of Ariel and Kfir Bibas. Jürg Lauber, president of the U.N. Human Rights Council at the time, stopped the video and declared that Bayefsky had used inappropriate language.

Advertisement

Bayefsky began the speech by saying, «The world now knows Palestinian savages murdered 9-month-old baby Kfir,» and she ws almost immediately cut off by Lauber.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«Sorry, I have to interrupt,» Lauber abruptly said as the video of Bayefsky was paused. Lauber briefly objected to the «language» used in the video, but then allowed it to continue. After a few more seconds, the video was shut off entirely. 

Advertisement

Lauber reiterated that «the language that’s used by the speaker cannot be tolerated,» adding that it «exceeds clearly the limits of tolerance and respect.»

Last year, when the previous incident occurred, Bayefsky said she believed the whole thing was «stage-managed,» as the council had advanced access to her video and a transcript and knew what she would say.

Advertisement

Related Article

UN chief blasted as ‘abjectly tone-deaf’ over message to Iran marking revolution anniversary



anti semitism,united nations,human rights united nations,politics,world

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias