Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Inside Joe Kent’s abrupt fall as GOP backlash grows over antisemitism accusations, FBI probe

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Joe Kent rose on the right as a combat veteran turned political insurgent — a former Green Beret and CIA officer who channeled his battlefield experience into a critique of America’s «endless wars» and the D.C. establishment that sustained them.

Advertisement

A vocal ally of President Donald Trump and a participant in post-2020 election challenges, Kent became a prominent voice in the populist wing of the GOP.

Now, his recent resignation as director of the National Counterterrorism Center — and his accusation that the war in Iran was driven by «pressure from Israel» — has triggered a swift GOP backlash, leaving Kent isolated from parts of the political movement that once embraced him.

TRUMP RESURFACES OLD TWEET FROM INTEL OFFICIAL WHO RESIGNED 

Advertisement

Kent’s Tuesday resignation letter laid out a direct challenge to the Trump administration’s justification for the Iran War, stating that «Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation» and arguing that the conflict was driven by «pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.» 

He also alleged that a «misinformation campaign» by Israeli officials and U.S. media had pushed the United States toward war, claims that quickly drew condemnation from lawmakers in both parties.

After Kent’s abrupt resignation, it came to light that he had been under investigation by the FBI for weeks for allegedly leaking classified information. 

Advertisement

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was unaware of the probe, a senior intelligence official told Fox News Digital Thursday. 

Administration officials also told Fox News Kent had been cut out of planning meetings for the current Iran mission, known as Operation Epic Fury, as well as the president’s daily briefings.

Kent’s resignation, now shadowed by a reported FBI investigation into alleged leaks, has thrust a once-rising figure in Trump’s orbit into the center of a growing clash over the administration’s Iran strategy, how intelligence is used in decisions on military action, and internal tensions within the national security team.

Advertisement

Joe Kent, former director of the National Counterterrorism Center, is sworn in to the House Homeland Security Committee hearing titled «Worldwide Threats to the Homeland,» Dec. 11, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

A combat veteran turned political figure

Kent’s rise in conservative circles was shaped as much by his military career as by personal loss. 

A 20-year Army Special Forces veteran and former CIA paramilitary officer, he served in multiple combat deployments before entering public life.

Advertisement

His profile grew significantly after the 2019 death of his first wife, Navy Senior Chief Shannon, who was killed in a suicide bombing in Syria. 

Kent frequently has cited her death as a turning point for him, fueling his criticism of what he describes as failed U.S. foreign policy and «endless wars» in the Middle East.

He later entered politics, running for Congress in 2022 and 2024 in Washington state as a Republican aligned with President Donald Trump’s «America First» movement. 

Advertisement

Kent secured Trump’s endorsement during his campaigns and became a prominent voice in the populist wing of the party, combining a hardline stance on national security with opposition to prolonged military interventions.

Shannon Kent

Kent was killed in an ISIS bombing in Syria in 2019.  (US Navy )

Signs of tension inside the intelligence community

Kent’s recent departure has raised questions about internal dynamics within the Trump administration’s national security team, particularly as differences emerge over Iran strategy and the intelligence used to justify it.

While Gabbard has long aligned herself with a more restrained approach to foreign policy, the White House has taken a more aggressive posture toward Iran, raising the possibility of a widening divide over both strategy and the intelligence used to justify it.

Advertisement

Gabbard has responded cautiously in the days since Kent’s resignation, avoiding a direct defense of his claims while emphasizing the role of the president in making final decisions.

In a statement on Iran threats following Kent’s departure, Gabbard did not mention him by name, instead stressing that intelligence agencies provide assessments but that «the president is responsible for determining what is and is not an imminent threat.»

Pressed by senators in a worldwide threat hearing Wednesday over whether she agreed with the White House that Iran posed an imminent threat to the U.S. prior to strikes that began Feb. 28, she repeatedly declined to say so, arguing it was up to the president to make such a determination.

Advertisement

During a parallel hearing in the House Thursday, Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., read portions of Kent’s resignation letter — including his claim that Israeli officials and U.S. media had pushed the United States toward war — and asked whether Gabbard agreed with the statement.

Sec. Pete Hegseth and counterterrorism director Joe Kent

War Secretary Pete Hegseth greets one of Joe Kent’s sons. The former National Counterterrorism Director is a father of two and a Gold Star spouse. (U.S. Army photo by Elizabeth Fraser / Arlington National Cemetery)

«He said a lot of things in that letter,» Gabbard responded, adding that the president «makes his own decisions based on the information that’s available to him.» 

When asked whether Kent’s comments concerned her, Gabbard replied simply: «Yes.»

Advertisement

TOP COUNTERTERRORISM OFFICIAL RESIGNS IN PROTEST OF US WAR AGAINST IRAN

Kent’s remarks also have drawn sharp criticism from senior Republicans. 

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell described the language in Kent’s resignation letter as «virulent anti-Semitism,» calling it «baseless and incendiary conspiracies» and saying such views have «no place» in government.

Advertisement

In early March, Gabbard’s chief of staff, Matt Baker, left his role, though a senior intelligence official told Fox News Digital Baker’s departure was a long-planned return to the private sector. 

Gabbard also has recently brought on Dan Caldwell, an outspoken advocate of a more restrained foreign policy. Caldwell previously was the subject of a Pentagon leak probe during his time working with War Secretary Pete Hegseth, though the results of that probe have not been publicized and Caldwell insists they are unsubstantiated. 

A source familiar with that move said Caldwell will be doing administration work rather than shaping policy.

Advertisement

Gabbard’s office could not immediately be reached for comment.

Non-interventionist Republicans praised Kent after his departure. 

«Another insider sees what we see: no imminent threat, just lobby pressure. This is why we need to defund and debate,» said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky. 

Advertisement

«Joe Kent is a GREAT AMERICAN HERO. God bless him and protect him! He just exposed that the war with Iran is AMERICA LAST and we voted against it,» said former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga.

A shift in his views on Iran

Kent’s past comments on Iran reflect a more nuanced position than his resignation might suggest. 

During his congressional campaigns, he consistently portrayed Iran as a real and ongoing threat and warned against allowing it to expand its influence across the region.

Advertisement

At times, Kent’s rhetoric went further, reflecting a willingness to use direct force against Iran when he viewed it as necessary. 

In a 2020 social media post following the U.S. strike that killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, commander of the elite Quds Force responsible for operations outside Iran. Kent urged the administration to «wipe Iran’s ballistic capability out,» while still calling for U.S. troops to be withdrawn from the region.

 The comments highlighted a tension that has defined his foreign policy views —support for aggressive, targeted action against adversaries alongside a deep opposition to prolonged military entanglements.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

By 2024, Kent had coalesced around a doctrine of what he described as «peace through strength,» praising Trump-era policies that combined sanctions, targeted strikes and diplomacy while avoiding large-scale military commitments. 

In a Newsweek op-ed that year, he argued that sending U.S. troops to confront Iran or its proxies would be «a huge mistake,» advocating instead for withdrawing forces from vulnerable positions while continuing to strike adversaries from a distance.

Advertisement

His resignation marks a sharper break: not just opposing escalation, but rejecting the premise that Iran posed an imminent threat at all.

Kent could not be reached for comment. 

Fox News Digital reached out to the FBI for comment on its ongoing investigation. 

Advertisement

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has called the claims in Kent’s resignation letter «false» and «laughable.» 

«There are many false claims in this letter, but let me address one specifically: that ‘Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation.’ This is the same false claim that Democrats and some in the liberal media have been repeating over and over,» she wrote on X.

«The absurd allegation that President Trump made this decision based on the influence of others, even foreign countries, is both insulting and laughable.»

Advertisement

war with iran,tulsi gabbard,counter terrorism,homeland security

INTERNACIONAL

Rey al rescate: Carlos III viaja a EE.UU. y busca salvar la relación especial tras los insultos de Trump a Starmer

Published

on


Después de muchos dimes y diretes, insultos al primer ministro sir Keir Starmer y reprobaciones de Donald Trump, la Casa Real británica ha decidido aplicar su pomposa diplomacia. El rey Carlos y la reina Camila visitarán finalmente Estados Unidos por tres días, a pesar de las tensiones con Trump por Irán. El presidente norteamericano está furioso con el gobierno británico por su no participación en la guerra en Irán.

El primer ministro británico sir Keir Starmer no irá. Luego de que Trump ninguneara sus habilidades al considerar la guerra contra Irán como ”ilegal” y se enfureciera diciendo públicamente que “no estaba hablando con Winston Churchill”, Starmer no lo considera apropiado. Lo reemplazará la canciller Yvette Cooper, quien dijo que Gran Bretaña no violaría sus intereses nacionales en una guerra, tras la experiencia en Irak.

Advertisement

A pesar de los llamamientos de algunos políticos británicos para posponer la visita debido a las tensiones en Oriente Medio, se entiende que la Casa Blanca, el Palacio de Buckingham y el gobierno británico están decididos a que se llevará a cabo del 27 al 29 de abril.

Por los 250 años de la independencia

Existe un fuerte consenso sobre la necesidad de que el rey visite Estados Unidos “para rendir homenaje al pueblo estadounidense, antes de las celebraciones del 250 aniversario de la independencia estadounidense el 4 de julio”.

Advertisement

«Esta será una visita sustancial del rey al pueblo estadounidense», declaró una fuente privada sobre los preparativos.

Posponerla hasta otoño no se considera una opción tras seis meses de planificación meticulosa, durante los cuales, según se informa, se enviaron asesores a Estados Unidos para «medir la situación».

Poderío militar a cambio de pompa

Advertisement

El rey será recibido con una demostración de poderío militar estadounidense a su llegada a EE.UU. para una visita de tres días, en un momento de baja tensión en la relación especial transatlántica entre ambos países, dinamitada por este conflicto.

El viaje, cuya planificación ha durado seis meses e incluyó un reconocimiento del terreno en Estados Unidos por parte de un equipo de los asesores más cercanos de Carlos y otros funcionarios, se llevará a cabo el próximo mes, a pesar de las tensiones entre el presidente y el primer ministro por la guerra en Irán.

Calendario alterado

Advertisement

El calendario ha sido alterado como una forma de expresar disconformidad. El rey pasará solo un día en Washington, donde participará en diversos compromisos, como un discurso ante el Congreso y un banquete nocturno.

Pasará otro día en Nueva York y hará una tercera parada en una zona rural aún por confirmar. Se espera que el monarca haga una cuarta parada en un país con vínculos con Gran Bretaña, posiblemente Bermudas.

Después del Trooping the Colour y la extraordinaria mini pompa «Disneyworld» con que fue recibido en Windsor en su segunda visita de Estado el año pasado, el equipo del presidente Trump ha llegado a la conclusión de que no pueden igualar la pompa y la ceremonia británicas. Esos «royals» que él adora, tanto como los dorados.

Advertisement

Intentarán impresionar a los reyes con una demostración del poderío militar estadounidense a su llegada a Washington. De eso se trata la actual diferencia entre ambos países: Gran Bretaña no tiene presupuesto militar como antes ni los mismos intereses geopolíticos que la administración Trump, ni tolera sus intromisiones en sus políticas.

Está más cerca de Europa. El 56 por ciento de los británicos quieren regresar a ser parte de la Unión Europea pos-Brexit en estas condiciones de inseguridad y populismo.

En las últimas semanas, Trump ha descrito repetidamente a Starmer como la antítesis de «un Winston Churchill». Se ha enfadado por la negativa de Starmer a permitir que Estados Unidos utilice bases en el Reino Unido para sus ataques ofensivos iniciales contra Irán y también ha criticado el acuerdo sobre Chagos.

Advertisement

Se entiende que la visita del rey es apolítica y que no se esperan grandes anuncios políticos durante el viaje.

Esto se debe en parte a que fuentes estadounidenses consideran que el gobierno británico no ha hecho lo suficiente para honrar las alianzas anteriores. Un acuerdo tecnológico de 31,000 millones de libras esterlinas, anunciado durante la visita de Estado de Trump al Reino Unido el año pasado, fue posteriormente suspendido por la Casa Blanca, que atribuyó la decisión a la falta de avances por parte de Gran Bretaña en la reducción de las barreras comerciales.

El presidente Trump ya había expresado su admiración por la familia real.

Advertisement

Preparativos difíciles

Miembros de la Casa Real visitaron Washington a principios de este año para realizar preparativos, incluyendo una visita al Congreso.

El equipo incluía a Theo Rycroft, secretario privado adjunto del rey y uno de sus asesores más cercanos, quien supervisó personalmente el reconocimiento del terreno en Estados Unidos en preparación para la visita de Carlos. Rycroft, uno de los diplomáticos británicos de mayor rango, está casado con Flora Astor, hermana de Samantha Cameron, la esposa del ex primer ministro.

Advertisement

Una fuente indicó que el asesor había estado analizando minuciosamente los detalles de las actividades del rey a su llegada a Estados Unidos, desde el horario de las cenas. Por la parte estadounidense, Monica Crowley, embajadora y jefa de protocolo de Estados Unidos, ha estado al frente de los preparativos.

Como es costumbre, el rey pronunciará un discurso ante el Congreso, que se compartirá con Starmer con antelación para su aprobación.

Se espera que destaque los lazos de amistad entre el Reino Unido y Estados Unidos. Como jefe de Estado y jefe de las fuerzas armadas británicas, probablemente haga referencia a la forma en que ambas fuerzas armadas han combatido juntas en conflictos desde la Revolución Americana.

Advertisement

La tradición dicta que el palacio anuncie las visitas de Estado, pero el martes la Casa Blanca pareció adelantarse cuando Trump confirmó en el Despacho Oval que el rey “vendría” y estaría en Estados Unidos “muy pronto”.

El Palacio de Buckingham reiteró que la visita aún no se había anunciado públicamente.

La visita del rey y la reina se inspirará en el viaje que su madre realizó a Estados Unidos en 1976 para celebrar el bicentenario del país. Aunque la visita del rey, de tres días, es mucho más corta que la de su madre, que fue de seis días; un reflejo de los difíciles tiempos diplomáticos.

Advertisement

Fuentes del palacio afirman que el programa más corto siempre estuvo planeado, en parte para tener en cuenta la avanzada edad del rey y su reciente lucha contra el cáncer. Sin embargo, se dice que está deseoso de incluir tantos compromisos como sea posible.

A pesar de los recientes ataques contra el Reino Unido, el afecto del presidente por la familia real británica se ha mantenido inquebrantable hasta ahora.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Neither the US nor Israel will ‘succeed in replacing the Iranian regime,’ retired US general says

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A retired U.S. general predicted that «neither Israel nor the U.S. will fully succeed in replacing the Iranian regime.» 

Advertisement

Former Lt. Gen. Mark Schwartz was quoted by the Israel Hayom newspaper as making the remark. The joint U.S. and Israeli missions against Iran, named Operation Epic Fury and Operation Roaring Lion, are in their 20th day Thursday.

«In my professional assessment, neither Israel nor the U.S. will fully succeed in replacing the Iranian regime. The main reason is that there are dozens, if not hundreds, of Iranian religious leaders who can replace the Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah, if he is eliminated,» Schwartz told Israel Hayom. 

«No matter how many successors you kill one after another, there will always be another one in line. Iran’s intelligence and security apparatus, the Revolutionary Guards, and the Iranian military also have depth. They are capable of replacing the top of the organization if it is destroyed,» he reportedly added. 

Advertisement

IRAN’S SUPREME LEADER MOJTABA KHAMENEI ‘MISFUNCTIONING,’ NOT CONTROLLING REGIME: SOURCES 

Retired Lt. Gen. Mark Schwartz, left, and Iran’s new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, right. (U.S. State Department; Rouhollah Vahdati/ISNA/WANA via Reuters)

Schwartz is a career Green Beret who served in the U.S. Army for 33 years, according to The National Special Forces Green Beret Memorial, where he is the chairman of the advisory board.  

Advertisement

The organization said, «During his career, Mark served throughout the Middle East, Europe, and North Africa,» and, «He has had the opportunity to lead strategic planning and operations working with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the United Nations, the European Union, and the United States Agency for International Development.» 

PENTAGON SEEKS AT LEAST $200 BILLION FROM CONGRESS FOR IRAN WAR 

Airplane targeted in strike

Recent footage shared by U.S. Central Command showed strikes against airplanes during the Iran war. (U.S. Central Command on X)

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard had warned Wednesday that if the Iranian regime survives Operation Epic Fury, «it will likely seek to begin a yearslong effort to rebuild its military, missiles and UAV forces.»   

Advertisement

Gabbard also said the intelligence community «assesses that Operation Epic Fury is advancing fundamental change in the region that began with Hamas’s attack on Israel on October 7th, 2023, and continued with the 12-day war last year, resulting in weakening Iran and its proxies.»   

Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei seated beside the Iranian flag during an address.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed at the beginning of Operation Epic Fury on Feb. 28, 2026. ( Office of the Supreme Leader of Iran via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

The campaign so far has resulted in the killing of former Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has been replaced by his son, Mojtaba Khamenei. 

Advertisement



war with iran,iran,israel,conflicts,middle east,military,world

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Mystery drones fly near DC-area military base as Iran tensions escalate

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

U.S. officials detected unidentified drones near a military installation in Washington, D.C., where top administration officials reportedly have been housed, as security concerns mount amid escalating tensions in the Middle East and with Iran. 

Advertisement

Multiple drones were spotted in recent days near Fort Lesley J. McNair, where Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth are living, The Washington Post reported, citing people briefed on the situation. The origin of the drones has not been determined.

The base, located in Southwest Washington, D.C., houses the National Defense University and senior military leadership. It also reportedly has been used to accommodate high-level administration officials amid elevated security concerns.

Officials with Joint Task Force–National Capital Region and the U.S. Army Military District of Washington said they are aware of the reported drone sightings. 

Advertisement

US DIPLOMATIC FACILITY IN IRAQ STRUCK BY DRONE

«We are aware of the reported drone sightings near Fort McNair and the surrounding areas,» Heather Chairez, media chief for Joint Task Force–National Capital Region and the U.S. Army Military District of Washington, told Fox News Digital Thursday. «We are working with our law enforcement and interagency partners to monitor and investigate the reported sightings.» 

«Our top priority is the safety of our service members and civilian personnel that work and live on the base,» she added. «Currently there is no credible threat to Fort McNair, but we will continue to monitor the situation and adjust force protection measures as needed.» 

Advertisement

A growing number of top officials, including Rubio and Hegseth, have moved into military housing in the Washington area, according to multiple reports, a shift that is unusual and has few modern precedents for civilian political appointees.

Fox News has not independently confirmed Rubio and Hegseth live at McNair. 

The reported sightings come as the United States has heightened security measures at military installations and diplomatic posts following ongoing U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, raising concerns about potential retaliation and attacks on U.S. troops. 

Advertisement

Iran increasingly has relied on drones as a central component of its military strategy, deploying unmanned systems and supporting proxy forces across the Middle East in attacks on U.S. and allied targets.

During the opening phase of Operation Epic Fury, an Iranian drone strike in Kuwait killed six U.S. service members, underscoring concerns among defense officials about the growing threat posed by unmanned systems.

Senate Democrats are planning to grind the Senate to a halt unless Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Secretary of War Marco Rubio testify publicly on the war in Iran.  (Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters)

Advertisement

Several U.S. bases have elevated force protection levels in recent days, including Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey and MacDill Air Force Base in Florida, which is home to U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). 

MacDill, which serves as the headquarters for CENTCOM and oversees all U.S. military operations in the Middle East, also has experienced multiple recent security incidents that prompted temporary lockdowns, according to base officials. Officials did not detail the nature of the threat but said they «take all threats seriously and will continue to prioritize the safety and security of our installation, our mission and our people.»

The State Department also has directed diplomatic posts worldwide to review and strengthen security measures in response to an evolving threat environment.

Advertisement
First-person-view training drones hang on a wall inside a drone instruction facility in Kyiv.

FPV training drones are seen on a wall at the Killhouse Academy drone training center on March 4, 2026, in Kyiv, Ukraine. (Chris McGrath/Getty Images)

IRAN’S DRONE SWARMS CHALLENGE US AIR DEFENSES AS TROOPS IN MIDDLE EAST FACE RISING THREATS

U.S. officials have not publicly identified the source or intent behind the drone activity near the nation’s capital, and it remains unclear whether the incidents are connected to broader geopolitical tensions.

U.S. law enforcement agencies also have been placed on heightened alert in recent weeks following a federal warning about intercepted communications believed to be of Iranian origin that could serve as a potential trigger for sleeper assets abroad, though officials said there was no specific or imminent threat tied to the alert.

Advertisement

Earlier in March, an FBI advisory referenced unverified intelligence suggesting Iran had explored launching drones from offshore platforms near California, though officials stressed the information was aspirational and not tied to any imminent threat.

Thick columns of smoke billow above buildings in Tehran after explosions rocked the city.

Plumes of smoke rise following reported explosions in Tehran, Iran, on March 2, 2026. (Sohrab/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

Experts say that while Iran has invested heavily in drone warfare abroad, the more plausible risk inside the United States would involve small, commercially available drones rather than large military systems.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Unauthorized drone incursions near sensitive government and military sites are typically monitored and assessed by multiple federal agencies, including the Department of War, federal law enforcement and aviation authorities.

The Pentagon and State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

army,pete hegseth,marco rubio,war with iran,drones,washington dc,pentagon,state department

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias