INTERNACIONAL
Irán juega la carta hutí: ¿cómo impactaría el cierre de otro estrecho clave para el comercio internacional?

Irán empezó a mostrar finalmente su carta hutí. Después de un sorprendente silencio de casi un mes, el grupo proxy yemení advirtió este jueves sobre la posibilidad de entrar en la guerra en Medio Oriente y encendió una alarma mundial ante la amenaza iraní de bloquear otro estrecho clave para el comercio marítimo internacional.
“Ante cualquier acontecimiento en el campo de batalla que requiera una respuesta militar, vamos a actuar sin demora”, afirmó el líder hutí, Abdul Malik al Huthi.
Sus declaraciones se conocieron un día después que Irán amenazó con bloquear el estrecho de Bab el Mandeb, un paso obligado hacia el canal de Suez desde el mar Rojo bajo influencia de ese grupo armado chiíta respaldado por Teherán y que controla gran parte del noroeste de Yemen.
De cumplir su amenaza, se convertiría en el segundo paso comercial marítimo bloqueado por Irán después del estratégico estrecho de Ormuz, por donde pasaba el 20% del transporte de crudo y gas mundial.
“Los hutíes siguen siendo un factor importante que Irán podría jugar si Trump cumple sus amenazas de invadir territorio iraní. Si se bloquean simultáneamente dos puestos de control cruciales, la economía mundial entrará en una profunda crisis”, dijo a TN el analista Ali Vaez, experto en Irán del Crisis Group, una ONG especializada en la resolución de conflictos.
Irán amenazó con cerrar el estrecho Bab el Mandeb. (Infografía: Iván Paulucci)
¿Por qué es tan importante el estrecho de Bab el Mandeb?
Los hutíes mantenían hasta hoy un enigmático silencio a solo dos días de cumplirse el primer mes de la guerra. Solo el Hezbolláh libanés y los grupos chiítas de Irak entraron en el conflicto en defensa de Irán. El Hamas palestino, otro grupo proxy, se encuentra fuera de escena tras dos años de guerra en Gaza.
Las milicias yemeníes tienen experiencia con combates en el mar Rojo. En 2023, en pleno conflicto de Gaza, atacaron a varios buques que atravesaron el estrecho de Bab el Mandeb en solidaridad con los palestinos.

Un miliciano hutí en un puesto defensivo en Yemen (Foto: Reuters)
Se trata de un paso clave para el comercio marítimo internacional. Conecta el canal de Suez, a través del mar Rojo, con el Golfo de Adén. Es una entrada vital para las transacciones entre Asia y Europa, en especial para el suministro mundial de energía.
Leé también: Guerra en Medio Oriente: exigencias “inaceptables” y amenazas alejan un acuerdo de paz entre Irán y EE.UU.
El corredor es uno de los más transitados del mundo. Por allí circula alrededor de una cuarta parte de todo el comercio marítimo global. Se estima que cada día pasan unos 4,5 millones de barriles de petróleo, según la Administración de Información de Energía de Estados Unidos.
Pero eso no es todo. También pasa el 8% de los cargamentos mundiales de gas natural licuado (GNL).
¿Puede Irán bloquear un segundo estrecho en Medio Oriente?
Si los hutíes empiezan a lanzar misiles contra buques en el estrecho de Bab el Mandeb provocaría un daño gravísimo al comercio mundial, ya conmocionado por el virtual cierre de Ormuz.
Irán lo sabe. Por eso amenaza con cerrarlo. Es una carta marcada que se guarda para evitar que Donald Trump lance una invasión sobre alguna de las islas del estrecho de Ormuz para reabrir ese paso marítimo si fracasan las negociaciones bilaterales.

Irán mantiene cerrado de facto el estrecho de Ormuz. (Foto: Reuters)
Distintos funcionarios estadounidenses, citados por el sitio Axios, dijeron que el presidente republicano maneja cuatro opciones sobre su escritorio.
- La invasión o el bloqueo de la isla de Kharg. Se trata del principal centro de exportación de petróleo de Irán.
- La toma de la isla de Larak. Es un puesto estratégico iraní que alberga búnkeres, lanchas de ataque capaces de destruir buques de carga y radares que monitorean todos los movimientos en el estrecho.
- El asalto de la isla de Abu Musa y otras dos más pequeñas. Están situadas cerca de la entrada occidental del estrecho. Si bien están bajo control de Teherán, son reclamadas por los Emiratos Árabes Unidos Unidos.
- El bloqueo o la incautación de los buques que exportan petróleo iraní. El ataque involucraría el lado oriental del estrecho de Ormuz.
Leé también: Cayeron las bolsas europeas y subió el petróleo en medio de la escalada de tensión entre EE.UU. e Irán
Si bien varias fuentes yemeníes citadas por medios de la región evalúan que las reservas militares de los hutíes se habrían acabado, la amenaza en el estrecho de Bab el Mandeb sigue siendo alta.
Otros analistas consideran que el poder de fuego hutí sigue siendo importante después de un mes de hostilidades.
Yasser al-Waili, un ex oficial militar yemení, dijo a The Media Line que “Irán considera a los hutíes su reserva estratégica, ya que posee un gran número de misiles y drones. Por eso ha mantenido a los hutíes fuera de la guerra”.
“Todo el mundo sabe que Irán previamente transfirió varias piezas de equipo de fabricación militar al puerto de Hodeidah”, bajo control hutí, concluyó.
Irán, EE.UU, Medio Oriente
INTERNACIONAL
Elon Musk demands judge’s recusal after latest flare-up over alleged bias

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Elon Musk demanded on Wednesday that a Delaware judge recuse herself from Tesla lawsuits, arguing she recently demonstrated her bias against him when she liked an anti-Musk LinkedIn post.
Musk’s lawyers filed a motion for recusal in Delaware’s Court of Chancery, which included a screenshot of Judge Kathaleen McCormick liking the social media post celebrating Musk’s $2 billion court loss in a separate case. The attorneys noted that the incident did «not exist in a vacuum.»
The lawyers were referring to McCormick previously presiding over high-stakes cases involving Musk and the tech billionaire accusing the judge of bias stretching back years. The ongoing friction with the judge follows hostility Musk has faced from the left in recent years, most notably when he became a close ally of President Donald Trump in 2024 and through the early months of the administration.
Musk’s lawyers said McCormick appeared to cheer on a lawyer on LinkedIn who made a post mocking Musk’s legal defeat in a California fraud case. McCormick is currently presiding over separate derivative litigation brought by Tesla shareholders who have alleged Musk harmed the company by overpaying himself and board members. The lawyers said one of McCormick’s staff members also liked another anti-Musk post related to Musk’s pending litigation.
TRUMP NOT INTERESTED IN TALKING TO MUSK: ‘ELON’S TOTALLY LOST IT’
President Donald Trump and Elon Musk attend a press conference in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., May 30, 2025. (REUTERS/Nathan Howard)
«This post to which the Court reacted and another to which a Court staff member reacted are not simply negative criticism of Mr. Musk and his attorneys, they are inflammatory,» Musk’s lawyers wrote.
The lawyers said that «the very facts underlying the litigation celebrated in the posts are squarely at issue in the consolidated and coordinated actions.»
McCormick later deactivated her LinkedIn account, and in a letter to attorneys in the case she denied supporting the anti-Musk post.
«I either did not click the ‘support’ icon at all, or I did so accidentally,» McCormick wrote. «I do not believe that I did it accidentally.»

screenshot of LinkedIn post (Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware )
McCormick in 2022 presided over a separate, high-profile lawsuit brought by Twitter, now called X, against Musk to force him to complete his $44 billion acquisition of the company after Musk attempted to back out over allegations the company misled him about the number of bots on the platform. Musk ended up moving forward with the acquisition and later testified that he felt forced to because he believed McCormick was biased against him.
«We were unlikely to win the [Twitter] case in Delaware because the judge was extremely biased against me,» Musk said this month, according to the recusal motion. «This was, in fact, the same judge that struck my Tesla option grant that was subsequently overturned by the Delaware Supreme Court. So it’s accurate to say she was, that judge was not favorably inclined to me. Not objective.»
In another lawsuit, McCormick in 2024 twice voided a multibillion-dollar pay package for Musk and the Tesla board, saying they had breached their fiduciary duties and that Musk effectively controlled the board. The Delaware Supreme Court reinstated the pay package but upheld McCormick’s underlying findings.
Musk responded that year to an X post from a conservative influencer about McCormick, writing «absolute corruption» after the influencer noted that she had previously worked at a Delaware law firm that donated to former President Joe Biden.

Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has indicated he may support Republican candidates in the upcoming midterm elections. (BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)
Musk’s grievances with McCormick began amid a national push against the tech billionaire as he began weighing in on politics, speaking out against the Democrat Party ahead of the 2022 midterms and endorsing Trump in the 2024 election.
He became the head of Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency in 2025, serving in the role as a special government employee as he sought to identify government overspending and fraud, which raised his status as a political target by the left. Democrat lawmakers condemned Musk’s DOGE efforts in protests, while Tesla locations were targeted by rioters last year as critics characterized Musk as an unelected billionaire working in the administration.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Trump and Musk had a public falling out last spring, when Musk openly opposed the president’s signature budget bill, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The pair have since been spotted chatting at various public events.
donald trump, elon musk, delaware, in court
INTERNACIONAL
Nicolás Maduro ante una corte de Nueva York: demacrado, ojeroso, con varios kilos de menos y un traje de presidiario color beige
INTERNACIONAL
House Democrats vote to keep DHS shuttered as funding lapse hits day 40

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
House Democrats largely voted in lockstep to continue the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) shutdown Thursday despite growing fallout over air travel nationwide.
Democrats’ opposition to ending the funding lapse — the second longest in history — comes as lawmakers could leave for recess before striking a deal.
The DHS funding measure still passed the House largely along party lines in a vote of 218-206. It was the third time House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has held a vote on the legislation since the funding lapse began Feb. 14.
The measure, sponsored by Rep. Juan Ciscomani, R-Ariz., would fund the department through the end of September. Reps. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, Jared Golden, D-Maine, Marie Gluesenkamp-Perez, D-Wash., and Don Davis, D-N.C., were the only Democrats to vote «yes» after previously supporting the DHS funding measure earlier in March.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., walks toward the House chamber on Capitol Hill on Dec. 18, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
SEE IT: TRAVELERS SOUND OFF AS ICE AGENTS DEPLOYED TO AIRPORTS AS SHUTDOWN DRAGS PAST 40 DAYS
Still, the measure is likely dead on arrival in the Senate, where both parties continue to negotiate an end to the stalemate.
Democrats have remained dug in against providing funding to DHS subagencies executing President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Top Democratic leaders continue to demand sweeping reforms — including requiring the use of judicial warrants — that Republicans have charged could impede law enforcement efforts.
The funding standoff has caused major travel disruptions nationwide as a shortage of Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agents has resulted in hours-long wait times at security checkpoints. More than 50,000 TSA personnel are set to miss their second full paycheck on Friday, leading to nearly 500 agents quitting and a surge in callouts.
«They’re using TSA agents, Coast Guardsmen and other DHS employees as pawns in their political game,» Republican Study Committee chairman August Pfluger, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital. «They’re just demonstrating a real willingness to hold hostage the American public.»
Members of the conservative RSC held a news conference Tuesday at Washington’s Reagan National Airport to spotlight the financial difficulties TSA officers are facing. Acting Deputy Administrator Adam Stahl said some personnel, many of whom live paycheck to paycheck, are sleeping in their cars and selling blood plasma to make ends meet.
«The Democrats know their plan is not working,» Rep. Mark Alford, R-Mo., told reporters. «They know Americans are hurting, and they are still doing it anyway.»

A Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agent looks at passengers queue to go through security at New York’s LaGuardia airport on March 22, 2026. (Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images)
FLASHBACK: JEFFRIES CALLED FAILING TO FULLY FUND DHS AN ‘ABDICATION OF RESPONSIBILITY’
House Democrats, however, have sought to blame Republicans for the funding stalemate and have signaled reluctance to walk away from their ICE reform demands.
«We want ICE to be compelled to conduct itself like every other law enforcement agency in the country,» Jeffries told reporters on Wednesday. «Immigration enforcement should be fair, just, and humane—that’s not what’s happening right now. ICE is out of control, and taxpayer dollars are being used in unacceptable ways.»
Republicans have fired back that it is essential to fund ICE, invoking the murder of 18-year-old Sheridan Gorman, who was killed by a Venezuelan illegal immigrant in Chicago last week. The foreign national, Jose Medina-Medina, was taken into custody by federal law enforcement in May 2023 but released into the United States under the Biden administration.

Sheridan Gorman (left), an 18-year-old college student, was killed in an alleged attack by a Venezuelan illegal. Speaker Mike Johnson (right), R-La., decried the murder, saying it was allowed by Democratic sanctuary policies. (Sheridan G. Gorman via Instagram; Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«Democrats in the House are demanding a DHS bill that would eliminate funding for the exact agencies that are tasked with preventing a tragedy like this,» House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said Wednesday during a House GOP leadership press conference. «They tell you what they prioritize. And it is the welfare of criminal illegal aliens over American citizens. We ought to believe what they say, the words in action.»
When asked about Gorman’s murder by an illegal immigrant Wednesday, Jeffries told Fox News he would look into the case without commenting further.
homeland security, government shutdown, democrats, immigration, politics
POLITICA1 día ago¡VERGÜENZA NACIONAL! Humillan a la Policía Federal mandándolos a un merendero antes de darles un aumento de sueldo digno
POLITICA2 días ago24 DE MARZO: La historia completa que el relato omitió sobre el golpe de 1976 y el Juicio a las Juntas
POLITICA1 día agoEl Presidente y Karina Milei volvieron a respaldar a Manuel Adorni tras la polémica por sus vuelos


















