INTERNACIONAL
Biden use of Hamas death count challenged by prominent statistician, says numbers ‘aren’t accurate’
JERUSALEM – During President Biden’s State of the Union speech, he used the Gaza death count produced by the Hamas-run ministry of health, quoting some 30,000 deaths. Those numbers have been scrutinized by a renowned University of Pennsylvania statistician who has cast serious doubt on the figures.
Abraham Wyner revealed in an interview with Fox News Digital that the U.S.-designated terrorist movement, Hamas, issued fake casualty numbers in its war against Israel. Wyner is a tenured professor of statistics and data science at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and faculty co-director of the Wharton Sports Analytics and Business Initiative.
His dramatic findings have ostensibly debunked many of the Hamas causality claims accepted at face value by President Biden’s administration, the U.N. and many major mainstream media organizations.
Possibly furthering Wyner’s calculation, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently announced that 13,000 terrorists had been killed in Gaza since the IDF went in. Wyner disputes the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry’s number that of the more than 30,000 Palestinians who have died since October 7, the majority are children and women.
WHY MIDEAST NEIGHBORS WON’T OFFER REFUGE TO PALESTINIANS STUCK IN GAZA WAR ZONE
Hamas invaded southern Israel on October 7 and slaughtered 1,200 people, including over 30 Americans.
He said he «was able to show that these numbers aren’t right» and, based on the number that Israel’s government is reporting, that the casualty rate «instead of, being 70% women and children, it’s probably closer to 30% to 35% women and children» in the Gaza Strip.
Israeli soldiers on a tank overlook the Gaza Strip on Friday, January 19. (AP/Maya Alleruzzo)
Wyner revealed in an interview with Fox News Digital that the U.S.-designated terrorist movement, Hamas, issued fake casualty numbers in its war against Israel.
The core of Wyner’s analysis revolves around statistical variability and correlation. He said «Hamas had claimed, and is continuing to claim, that approximately 70% of the casualties have been women and children. They are not reporting, or had at the time, and by mid-November, had not reported that Israel had killed any of its own fighters.»
Wyner continued, «But they weren’t differentiating between fighters and civilians . . . they were reporting that there were just not very many men dying. Subsequently, by February, they reported that about 25% of the casualties were their own fighters, which left a strange situation . . . there just aren’t enough civilian men dying.»
He added, «They’re just they’re missing. And what we call the missing male problem, which suggests that the numbers as being represented aren’t accurate.»
GAZA CITY, GAZA – OCTOBER 9: Civilians take part in search-and-rescue works after Israeli airstrikes destroy buildings in Gaza City, Gaza, on October 9, 2023. (Photo by Belal Khaled/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
ISRAEL’S US AMBASSADOR SLAMS SCHUMER’S ‘UNHELPFUL’ ANTI-NETANYAHU SPEECH: ‘ISRAEL IS A SOVEREIGN DEMOCRACY’
According to Wyner, «And so what that means is the number of people dying every day is almost the same. It isn’t changing very much, and that just didn’t make any sense to me. In war, there should be variability. Variability coming from war plans, from lulls, from intense increases in activity. And none of that was observable in the data. There was what we call too little dispersion.»
White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, during a recent press briefing, was asked why Biden had quoted the Hamas numbers in an interview. ,
Jean-Pierre said, «What we — we have said — we’ve been really clear: There are publicly available data that showed, sadly, how many — how many deaths that we have seen in Gaza. And the President has been very clear. There’s too much. It’s tragic. It’s tragic what we’re seeing. And the President’s going to keep — continue to speak to that.»
When approached by Fox News Digital about Wyner’s report, which was first published in March by the online magazine Tablet, a U.S. State Department spokesperson said «Far too many civilians have been killed in this conflict. Every civilian death in conflict is a tragedy. Deaths are not mere statistics; they’re lost futures, dreams and potential.»
U.S. President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address during a joint meeting of Congress in the House chamber at the U.S. Capitol on March 7, 2024, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) (Getty Images)
The State Department did not refute Wyner’s findings. In late October, President Biden said he has «no confidence in the number that the Palestinians are using» for the death toll in Gaza.
However, both Biden and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin have since January adopted the Hamas numbers as truth, only to have to walk back their statistics as coming from the jihadi terrorist entity Hamas.
Wyner does not dispute the State Department contention about the tragedy of civilian deaths, noting, «The ratio of casualties, civilian casualties to military casualties is in the realm of 1 to 1. And historically, that’s actually an excellent sign of intense care being placed to just target enemies and keep the civilian population as safe as possible, recognizing that war is horrible and war does produce collateral damage, as in every loss of life is tragic, but war is tragic, and war causes death.»
But he stresses that «The stakes are extremely high. Hamas’s only path to victory, whatever it may be, is through international pressure, namely through the United States. And the only way they can get there is to convince the United States that the civilian casualties are not coming with a commensurate military gain. And that would potentially cause Israel to be forced into a cease-fire, whether that’s permanent or temporary. That is, leaves Hamas in place.»
ISRAEL AMBASSADOR WARNS UN ‘CONTAMINATED’ BY ANTISEMITISM, SAYS PEACE WITH SAUDIS CAN ‘TRANSFORM’ REGION
Ambulances carrying victims of Israeli strikes crowd the entrance to the emergency ward of the Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City on October 15, 2023. Israel embarked on a withering air campaign against Hamas terrorists in Gaza after they carried out a brutal attack on Israel on October 7 that left more than 1,400 people dead in Israel. ( (Photo by Dawood NEMER / AFP) (Photo by DAWOOD NEMER/AFP via Getty Images))
Wyner said about the lack of correlation in Hamas’ data, «The basic idea is that on days where there isn’t very much bombing, you should see just a few children and women dying. And there’s more. You should see more women and children dying on days where there’s lots of civilian casualties as opposed to fighters. You should see a few women and children, and on days where there’s lots of civilians dying, you should see lots of women and children. But that relationship wasn’t there. It was what we call uncorrelated.»
A spokeswoman from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs(OCHA) told Fox News Digital, «The United Nations relies on the Health Ministry in Gaza as a source for casualties figures in that area, as it is nearly impossible at the moment to provide any UN verification on a day-to-day basis. Any of their data used in our products is clearly sourced.»
The U.N. does not classify Hamas as a terrorist organization.
A smoke rises over buildings in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, during an Israeli air strike. (Photo by Sameh Rahmi/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Critics have lamented that many legacy news organizations and politicians have failed to differentiate between civilians and Hamas terrorists who were killed during the war—as well as highlight that a terrorist organization, with a reported history of fabricating death tolls, supplies the numbers.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Wyner said that the left-of-center Israeli daily Haaretz reported in 2011—two years after the 2009 Israeli operation in Gaza against Hamas terrorists—that «Hamas admitted that the numbers that it had been telling the public about the size of their losses, of their fighter losses, which they had reported to be 49, was actually over 700, which was exactly what Israel had said it was in the very beginning.»
He added, «So Israel has a good record of keeping track of the number of Hamas fighters that it kills, and Hamas doesn’t have a good record. Yet, the media was largely ignoring Israel’s claims or, when reporting them at all, noticing that they are unverifiable. Yet, the data right in front of you, coming from Hamas, showed pretty clear evidence that there is significant problems with the numbers. They don’t match reality.»
INTERNACIONAL
Ukraine enters fourth year of war with Russia: ‘Closer to the beginning than we are to the end’
«We are way closer to the beginning than we are to the end,» former CIA Moscow station chief Dan Hoffman said as Ukraine entered a fourth year of war on Monday.
Since the Nov. 5, 2024, re-election of President Donald Trump, the Western world has been scrambling to understand what the future holds for Russia’s war in Ukraine as Washington looks to re-establish ties with Moscow in a move to end the conflict and secure a peace deal.
In the span of a week, Trump held a call with Russian President Vladimir Putin; Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov; retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, met with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sparked international debate by pronouncing that Ukraine would unlikely be permitted to join NATO.
Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky meet on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference in Germany on Feb. 14, 2025. (Tobias Schwarz/AFP via Getty Images)
TRUMP ENVOY FOR RUSSIA AND UKRAINE CALLS ZELENSKYY A ‘COURAGEOUS LEADER’ AFTER TRUMP LAMBASTS FOREIGN FIGURE
But far from bringing a sense of optimism that an end to the brutal war in Ukraine could be on the horizon, questions erupted across the globe as the geopolitical atmosphere descended into a state of confusion.
«What a ceasefire would look like? I have no idea,» Hoffman said, highlighting the numerous and almost indeterminable factors that will shape whether Moscow and Kyiv agree to terms under a deal.
«It’s getting the Russians to stop. That’s the key,» he explained. «The Russians are intrigued by the idea that they could make a grand bargain with this administration and eliminate the sanctions that are causing so much harm.
«But what hangs over this is Vladimir Putin – he’s a KGB guy. He hates Donald Trump just as much as he hates Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, and every one of us, because the United States is the main enemy,» Hoffman explained. «He’s going to try to get a great deal.
«Putin’s going to try to frame negotiations as if Russia is going toe to toe with the United States, he will want to make it look like Russia got the better of us, to enhance his own image and the Kremlin’s [to] throw weight against us globally, including in the MIddle East and Africa,» Hoffman explained.
Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting via video link at the Kremlin in Moscow, Sept. 18, 2023. (Sputnik/Mikhail Metzel/Pool)
TRUMP SOUNDS OFF ON ZELENSKYY’S INSULTS AS US WORKS TO BROKER UKRAINE PEACE DEAL WITH RUSSIA: ‘I’VE HAD IT’
Some of the biggest factors that will be involved in negotiating a ceasefire will be security guarantees for Ukraine, including whether Russia has the right to influence who can be permitted into the alliance.
«Ukraine’s NATO membership should not be a negotiation tactic, because we don’t want Russia to have, you know, de facto veto power over who joins NATO,» Catherine Sendak, director of transatlantic defense and security with the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA), said during a discussion on Ukraine on Thursday.
Some nations like Britain and France have said they may be willing to send in troops to serve as a deterring force should a ceasefire be agreed to, though Russian officials have already said NATO forces in Ukraine would be unacceptable to Moscow.
Though even with European forces in Ukraine, it remains unclear in what capacity as a deterring force they would serve.
Questions over whether European forces would help police Ukrainian borders shared with Russia or merely act as air and naval support for Kyiv remain.
Experts involved in the CEPA discussion were unanimous in their agreement that the U.S. should be involved, though the Trump administration has already suggested that not only will the possibility of the U.S. sending in troops to Ukraine not be an option, but it may look to remove American forces currently positioned around Europe.
«Many European nations just have not had any experience in leading a force of that size,» said William Monahan, senior fellow with CEPA and former deputy assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs during the previous Trump administration.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, left, and French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace in France. (Michael Kappeler/dpa Michael Kappeler/picture alliance via Getty Images)
UKRAINE WAR ‘WILL END SOON’ UNDER TRUMP’S LEADERSHIP, US NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR VOWS
«Determining where the U.S. could be providing key enablers, I think, would be an essential element of any force, and determining its credibility and deterrence capability,» he added.
Putin has made clear that his latest war objective is the ownership of four Ukrainian regions, Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, which he illegally «annexed» in 2022 but none of which have his forces been able to fully seize.
Zelenskyy has said he will not agree to cede any land to Russia, including Crimea, which Russia has illegally occupied since 2014, but which Hegseth said this month would be an «unrealistic» objective at the negotiating table.
Though some Western experts have argued that Ukraine does not necessarily need to cede land in order to reach a ceasefire agreement.
This proposal suggests that the Ukrainian territory would remain internationally recognized as «occupied» by Russia, which would allow the fighting to stop, though Kyiv and its international partners would then need to attempt to renegotiate land releases at a later time.
What has become clear is the Trump administration’s push for Europe to be more heavily involved in providing military support to Ukraine. But as European nations look to ramp up defense on the continent without Washington’s support, security experts are warning this is changing geopolitical views of the U.S. and its reliability as an ally.
«I think there is a group of European countries now, I think increasingly, including the U.K. potentially, and France, that actually are beginning to see the U.S. as part of the problem,» said Sam Green, director of democratic resilience at CEPA and professor of Russian politics at King’s College London.
Ukrainian soldiers fire mortars toward the city of Ugledar, Donetsk on April 18, 2023. (Muhammed Enes Yildirim/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
EU WARNS TRUMP AGAINST LETTING PUTIN DIVIDE THE US AND EUROPE: ‘LET’S NOT DO HIM THE FAVOR’
Green said European nations may need to come up with their own solution to counter a U.S.-Moscow proposal for a ceasefire in Ukraine.
Ultimately, the security experts warned that the increasingly apparent divisions between Washington under the Trump administration and Europe are playing into one of Putin’s longtime chief aims.
«I think there’s a need to get a coordinated approach that brings in our allies and partners [and] maintains that source of strength,» Monahan said. «I think Putin is very happy he has been able to achieve one of his strategic goals, which is create disunion and division among the United States and its allies in the transatlantic relationship.»
When asked by Fox News Digital if some of the controversial comments made by Trump, like calling Zelenskyy a dictator, claiming he has low internal approval ratings and seeming to suggest he was to blame for Russia’s illegal invasion, are aiding Putin in his negotiating calculus, Hoffman said, «I don’t know what damage, if any, it’s causing, but the intelligence community can assess that.»
Former President Donald Trump meets with Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at Trump Tower on Sept. 27, 2024, in New York City. (AP/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
«What Vladimir Putin thinks about the U.S. and Ukraine, about Zelenskyy and Trump going, rhetorically at least, toe to toe in the Octagon against each other – it’s not a great look,» he added.
«[Putin] thinks he can break Europe. He doesn’t think Europe is going to be strong enough without the United States,» Hoffman argued. «That’s certainly the past. The history during the Soviet-Evil Empire, it was the U.S. strength, our nuclear umbrella, that deterred the Soviet Union from expanding.
«NATO has always been an alliance to deter Russian aggression,» he said. «We’re nowhere close to knowing how all this is going to play out.
«Right now, you’re just hearing a lot of noise,» Hoffman cautioned.
-
POLITICA1 día ago
Sorpresivo giro en el caso YPF: por una denuncia contra Cristina y Eskenazi, la jueza Preska podría revocar su fallo contra argentina por u$s 16.000 millones
-
CHIMENTOS2 días ago
Se filtró una foto de Susana Giménez en el sanatorio donde fue internada de urgencia su hija: “Está muy preocupada”
-
POLITICA3 días ago
Los 4.000 millones de Axel Kicillof que dejaron al descubierto las trampas de las licitaciones
-
POLITICA2 días ago
Polémica en la CPAC por el gesto de un exasesor de Donald Trump: “Hace referencia a la ideología nazi”
-
POLITICA2 días ago
Mauricio Macri acusó a Santiago Caputo de estar detrás de una “comisión trucha” por la Hidrovía
-
CHIMENTOS3 días ago
Santi Maratea deja las colectas y se embarca en un sueño personal