Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Burkina Faso’s security forces are killing more civilians. Survivors detailed 1 village’s massacre

Published

on


DAKAR, Senegal (AP) — Women slain with babies wrapped against their bodies, lifeless children intertwined together, a 2-month-old face-up on the ground with puppies crawling on his tiny frame. The scenes were horrifying, but the 32-year-old farmer felt he had to document them, as proof of the carnage in his central Burkina Faso village.

More than a dozen relatives were killed Nov. 5 when security forces attacked with mounted pickup trucks, guns and drones, he told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity, for fear of retaliation. He said he hid for hours in a neighbor’s compound and took a series of photos before fleeing the next morning.

PRIVATE PLANE CRASH KILLS 5, INJURES 2 IN BURKINA FASO

Dozens more were killed that day in Zaongo village, according to his account and that of two other survivors, as well as a U.N. report citing government figures. The images the man sent AP and the interviews with the three survivors are rare firsthand accounts amid a stark increase in civilian killings by Burkina Faso’s security forces as the junta struggles to beat back a growing jihadi insurgency and attacks citizens under the guise of counterterrorism.

Most attacks — including the slaying of children by soldiers at a military base last year, uncovered in an AP investigation — go unpunished and unreported in a nation run by a repressive leadership that silences perceived dissidents.

Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

A mural is seen in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, Wednesday March 1, 2023. Three survivors of an attack in Zaongo, central Burkina Faso, told AP that dozens of people were killed in their village on Nov. 5 when security forces attacked. One of the survivors, a 32-year-old farmer, said he photographed the horrific scenes of bodies as proof of the carnage before fleeing.  (AP Photo)

More than 20,000 people have been killed since jihadi violence linked to al-Qaida and the Islamic State group first hit the West African nation nine years ago, according to the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project, a U.S.-based nonprofit. The fighting has divided a once peaceful population, blockaded dozens of cities and led to two military coups.

Advertisement

Civilian deaths at the hands of security forces increased by 70% from 2022 to 2023 — to 735 people killed from 430, ACLED figures show.

Burkina Faso’s government spokesman didn’t respond to requests for comment about the Nov. 5 attack. Previously, officials have denied killing civilians and said jihadis often disguise themselves as soldiers.

The three survivors told AP they’re certain the men were security forces, not jihadis. They describe them wearing military uniforms, one with a Burkina Faso flag fastened to him as he tried to warn a group of civilians that anyone found alive would be killed. The farmer saw a helicopter flying toward the village in the attack’s aftermath — those are used solely by the military, not insurgents.

The United Nations urged the government to conduct an independent and transparent investigation into the attack, hold those responsible accountable, and compensate victims and families, said Seif Magango, spokesperson for the U.N. Human Rights Office.

Burkina Faso’s prosecutor’s office said it opened an investigation, but four months later, survivors said they’ve had no news.

«THEY MASSACRED THEM»

It was early morning when the farmer heard gunshots in the distance. He was cultivating land a few miles from home with his father, he said, and they returned to the village to wait it out.

Advertisement

Violence in Namentenga province is frequent, locals said — it’s common to hear shootings and see soldiers on patrol.

But this Sunday was different.

About 3 p.m., the farmer said, hundreds of men — most in military fatigues — stormed through on motorbikes and trucks and started indiscriminately killing people.

He hid at the neighbor’s home, he said, and after hours of gunshots, the man with the Burkina Faso flag entered, warning people to stay out of sight.

«The soldier told us that his colleagues were in the other compound,» the farmer said. «He said he didn’t want to hurt us, but if the others realized we were still alive, they’d kill us.»

When the guns stopped that evening, he said, he left the compound and saw Zaongo littered with dead and injured men, women and children. Among them were his father, two brothers, a sister and her four children.

His uncle’s body lay under a pile of several children. His 63-year-old father was by the door of their house.

Advertisement

«These people sought shelter in their huts, but they massacred them,» the farmer said.

THE JUNTA TODAY

It’s unclear what prompted the attack, but locals said most times, security forces think villagers are working with the extremists.

Since seizing power in the second coup in September 2022, the junta led by Capt. Ibrahim Traoré has threatened rights groups and journalists and carried out attacks against civilians — potential war crimes under international law.

Military drone strikes late last year claiming to target Islamic fighters killed at least 60 people at two markets and a funeral in Burkina Faso and neighboring Mali, according to Human Rights Watch.

The junta is on a war footing as it tries to beat back the jihadis, who’ve overtaken more than half the country, according to conflict analysts and Sahel region experts. It’s using a new general mobilization law to expand its crackdown and force people into combat.

The junta is distancing itself from regional and Western nations that don’t agree with its approach. This year, it left the West African regional economic bloc known as ECOWAS and created an alliance with Mali and Niger, also run by military juntas battling jihadi insurgencies.

Advertisement

The junta severed military ties with former colonial ruler France. Officials have welcomed several dozen Russians tasked in part with keeping the junta in power, according to several conflict experts and a diplomat who spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to discuss the matter.

In November, days after the Zaongo massacre, 50 Russians arrived in Burkina Faso to protect the junta, influence public opinion and provide security services, said Lou Osborn with All Eyes on Wagner, a project focusing on the Russian mercenary group, which operates in a handful of African countries.

While the Wagner Group’s future has been uncertain since leader Yevgeny Prigozhin died in a suspicious plane crash last year, its presence in Burkina Faso is part of the group’s new and more visible phase of influence, Osborn said. A pro-Russian association called the Africa Initiative has been established and is staffed with former Prigozhin employees, she said.

Its goal, initiative president Soumaila Azenwo Ayo told AP, is promoting Russian and Burkina Faso culture and language, in part through its new radio program, «Russian Hour.»

Africa is key to Russia politically and economically as it seeks allies amid its war in Ukraine. But Wagner mercenaries have been accused by rights groups and civilians of committing human rights atrocities in the countries where it operates, including the killing of 300 people at a Mali village in 2022. An increased Burkina Faso presence would bring fear of even more civilian deaths.

The United States said it has cut and suspended assistance to Burkina Faso’s military but still supplies nonlethal equipment to civilian security forces such as the national police. In January, it delivered nearly 100 bikes and pickups.

In a statement, the State Department said it has provided $16 million in «counterterrorism capacity building assistance» to Burkina Faso since 2022.

Advertisement

«We are not aware of any diversion of misuse of recent equipment,» it said. «We take allegations seriously and will continue to monitor and evaluate use of our security assistance.»

Some analysts said continued U.S. aid sends the wrong message.

«Other countries around the world are seeing and watching and saying to themselves, ‘I can also jail all of my opponents, kill civilians under the guise of counterterrorism efforts and also play friendship with Russia, China — and the US will still give me all the toys I’ve asked for,’» said Aneliese Bernard, a former State Department official specializing in African affairs who runs a risk advisory group.

CIVILIANS IN THE MIDDLE

During the Nov. 5 attack, men in military uniforms speaking French and local language Moore called for all men to leave their houses, a 45-year-old mother told AP.

Peering through the window of the home where she hid, she said, she saw relatives being killed — more than 15 in all.

She said she was spotted by a soldier, who motioned for her to lie down and stay silent. The men dressed, looked and sounded like the soldiers who regularly pass through the village inspecting people’s documents, she said.

Advertisement

The third survivor who spoke to AP, a 55-year-old man from Zaongo, said villagers had been accused of working with the jihadis because they refused to join tens of thousands of volunteer fighters serving alongside Burkina Faso’s military.

Recruiting is part of the junta’s strategy, but residents said this has only contributed to civilian killings as volunteers round up anyone they suspect of ties to the extremists. It also provokes jihadis to attack communities with volunteers, they said.

Civilians are increasingly caught in the middle as violence intensifies. More than 2 million have been displaced and tens of thousands face severe hunger, according to the U.N. The insecurity makes it hard for aid groups to get assistance to those who need it.

At least 74 civilians were killed in connection with a weekslong convoy carrying food and aid in December, according to ACLED. They were killed by both the military and jihadis, two aid workers told AP on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak about the matter. One worker said the jihadis accused the civilians of providing information to the convoy’s armed escort.

An internal report for aid workers seen by AP said soldiers escorting the food supplies «fired on suspected accomplices» of jihadi-affiliated fighters.

«WE’RE FRIGHTENED»

Four months after the attack, survivors fear that bodies still lie on the ground rotting in Zaongo, now occupied by jihadis. Some relatives were able to return about a week after the deaths, but there were too many bodies and not enough time to bury them all, they said. They’ve been unable to get back since.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

It’s still unclear how many people were killed – reports from survivors, the U.N. and aid groups vary, from 70 to more than 200.

Survivors are displaced in different parts of the country. They’re calling on the government to hold the killers accountable while living in fear that it could happen again.

«We never thought that so many people could be killed at once,» said the surviving woman who spoke to AP.

«When a door slams or a child shouts, we’re frightened. If we go back there, we’ll just die.»

Source link

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Ucrania y los misiles de Joe Biden: trasfondos de la guerra de mil días

Published

on


Una visión amplia de la guerra constata que Ucrania ha estado combatiendo con una mano atada a la espalda, en desventaja. Es la que Joe Biden le acaba de desatar al permitir que Kiev bombardee con misiles occidentales de largo alcance las bases militares desde las que Rusia ataca al país europeo. Son proyectiles norteamericanos pero también hay británicos y habrá franceses.

La medida marca un giro crucial en la guerra de mil días que se libra en esas fronteras. Aunque no cambie de modo radical el curso del conflicto, importa su efecto político. La decisión de Biden y sus aliados europeos equilibra el terreno al mismo tiempo que desafía una línea roja que el autócrata Vladimir Putin instaló entre la OTAN y el arsenal nuclear ruso, el mayor del mundo.

La noción que expone el líder del Kremlin es que un ataque en su territorio implicaría la escalada del conflicto al conjunto de la Alianza Atlántica. Sería la tercera guerra mundial, un concepto que aparece con inquietante frecuencia ya en análisis y declaraciones. Es el espectro que Putin manipula para ganar iniciativa usando hasta el desgaste la amenaza nuclear como peaje extorsivo para salir victorioso de este conflicto.

Lo acaba de remachar al promulgar la legislación que habilita el uso del arma atómica ante un ataque convencional a su país, respuesta previsible a la movida de Bien. También con un mensaje este jueves en el cual se atribuye el derecho a golpear cualquier blanco occidental y exhibiendo un nuevo misil de mediano alcance. Del otro lado lo dejan obligado al prepoteo descontando que no pasará de ahí.

El arsenal nuclear es la última moneda de cambio con que cuenta Rusia y es costumbre que la use como palanca de presión», advierte David Langer en The New York Times. Joseph Nye, el enorme geopolitólogo emérito de Harvard también avisó tiempo atrás sobre este posible exceso, pero aclaró que Putin puede ser dogmático, pero difícilmente suicida.

No todos lo ven de ese modo, especialmente en el vecindario ruso. El gobierno sueco acaba de actualizar un manual público de crisis que incluye fórmulas de aprovisionamiento de víveres y como usar las pastillas de iodo que auxilian contra la radiación. Lo mismo hicieron Finlandia, Noruega y Dinamarca.

Advertisement
Donald Trump y Volodimir Zelenski en Nueva York. Foto Reuters

“La perspectiva general es que no se puede excluir la posibilidad de un ataque armado”, explicó Svante Werger, de la Agencia Sueca de Contingencias Civiles. “El entorno de seguridad global se ha vuelto más impredecible”, concuerda Erikka Koistinen, directora de comunicaciones del Ministerio del Interior de Finlandia.

Suena a paradoja que mientras el conflicto parece escalar a esos niveles imprevisibles incluso de pánico, detrás del escenario, sigilosamente, es muy probable que se esté andando el camino a una solución a la guerra. Una cuestión no está desligada de la otra. Cómo se llegue a ese punto definitorio será central para discutir las condiciones.

Rusia ha venido mejorando su posición en el terreno con avances importantes de hasta un kilómetro diario en el este en una de las ofensivas más potentes desde el inicio de la guerra. El presidente ucraniano Volodimir Zelenski reconoció recientemente las dificultades crecientes de su ejército en el frente con la tropa agotada. Eso incluye el sorprendente desembarco de unos 10 mil soldados norcoreanos del lado ruso, el pretexto de Biden para esta decisión misilística.

La importancia de esa presencia en el terreno no es su potencial militar, sino la implicancia del alcance de la alianza que se ha formado entre estos dos jugadores dentro del eje anti occidental que suma a Irán y encabeza decididamente China. En ese desafío de magnitud hay muchas claves que explican comportamientos que pueden parecer contradictorios.

Trump ha multiplicado en la campaña las señales de que buscaría resolver esta crisis si es preciso a favor de Moscú. Sin embargo, en el campamento del presidente electo, salvo los más dogmáticos como su hijo del mismo nombre o conocidos pro rusos como Marjorie Taylor Greene, no hubo el aluvión de repudios que podría esperarse al anuncio de Biden que configura un cambio en la guerra a solo dos meses que asuma su sucesor. Trump, que no suele descansar de las redes, se ha mantenido en silencio.

El desafío de la alianza de Rusia con China

El magnate es improbable que haya cambiado sus ideas sobre deshacerse de este conflicto y no necesariamente para ahorrar los insumos multimillonarios que requiere de modo constante Kiev, como demagógicamente prometió en la campaña. Ese costo es un detalle en el presupuesto norteamericano, advierte el Premio Nobel Paul Krugman.

Advertisement

Para disipar dudas, Trump acaba de designar al frente del aparato de inteligencia, incluyendo a la CIA, a una ex congresista demócrata, Tulsi Gabbard, a quien Moscú considera una “camarada” por su pública simpatía con el Kremlin y justificar la invasión a Ucrania en culpas norteamericanas. Este nombramiento está a tono con un universo de otros altos funcionarios como el futuro canciller Marco Rubio o el vicepresidente J.D. Vance que han exhibido su desdén por el drama de Kiev y reducen el valor geopolítico del conflicto.

Los misiles ATACMS, con alcance a 300 kilómetros que dispara Ucrania a blancos en Rusia. Foto APLos misiles ATACMS, con alcance a 300 kilómetros que dispara Ucrania a blancos en Rusia. Foto AP

Pero hay otras consideraciones que ganan peso con la cercanía con el poder. Desde su primer mandato Trump definió a China como la mayor amenaza de EE.UU., un criterio que adoptó también Biden. Beijing es el principal aliado de Moscú en el nuevo eje Este-Oeste que completan Irán y Norcorea. Desarmar esa sociedad que define la geopolítica de la etapa, puede parecer ilusorio, pero su existencia une con un mismo sedal la guerra de Ucrania, las de Oriente Medio con Teherán en la mira, la beligerancia de Pyongyang en el nordeste asiático y la competencia hegemónica con Beijing. Están ahí todos los enemigos de la potencia norteamericana.

Trump y su equipo estratégico probablemente asuman que no es posible apagar el conflicto ucraniano con la victoria nítida que pretende Rusia. Ese desenlace puede depararle al republicano el mismo costo que sufrió Biden con la salida desordenada de Afganistán, como ya ha señalado esta columna. Pero por encima de ese disgusto, convertiría en un acierto la decisión china de constituir la “alianza sin límites” que el presidente Xi Jinping forjó con Putin horas antes de la invasión de febrero de 2022.

El autócrata ruso Vladimir Putin. Foto APEl autócrata ruso Vladimir Putin. Foto AP

Es por eso que la dimensión real de este conflicto determina que una derrota de Ucrania debilitaría a Occidente y a EE.UU. y fortalecería a China. Es por eso que el establishment mundial se enfila detrás de Kiev, a disgusto incluso. Tienen mucho que perder si falla la ecuación.

Hace una semana, el miércoles 13, Biden y Trump se reunieron en la Casa Blanca para acordar una transición fluida y sin conflicto del poder. Ese encuentro incluyó Ucrania y disparó las especulaciones sobre un pacto en esa escenario. Es probable. No todo es lo que parece.

Los misiles ATACMS de largo alcance como sus similares europeos, son poderosos pero pueden ser destruidos por las eficientes defensas rusas. , De todos modos y es lo que importa, “alcanzan los puestos de mando, las unidades militares, los sistemas de apoyo logístico, arsenales, aeropuerto y bases de lanzamiento de proyectiles”, enumera Mykhailo Samus, del Centro de Estudios del Ejército en Ucrania. No le gana la guerra, pero “le desarma el santuario que armó Putin» en la frontera, explica a la BBC Kurt Voolmer, ex enviado de la Casa Blanca a Ucrania.

Para que esta observación se aleje del terreno especulativo conviene recordar que Zelenski luego de un reciente encuentro extenso con Trump sorprendió al comentar que con el regreso del republicano se lograría un acuerdo que finalice la guerra en términos justos. «EE.UU. está con Kiev», añadió. La insistente y furiosa lluvia de misiles de estos días sobre Ucrania, incluidos últimamente los balísticos, puede estar revelando que Putin sabe mucho más de estas trastiendas de lo que suponemos.

© Copyright Clarín 2024

Advertisement
Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias

Copyright © 2024 - NDM Noticias del Momento - #Noticias #Chimentos #Politica #Fútbol #Economia #Sociedad