«Think of Mojtaba Khamenei as his father on steroids.»

That is how Kasra Aarabi, director of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps research at the advocacy group United Against Nuclear Iran, described Iran’s new supreme leader in comments to Fox News Digital following reports that the son of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has been selected to lead the Islamic Republic.

«Mojtaba was already operating as a ‘mini supreme leader’ in the Bayt-e Rahbari — his father’s office and the core nucleus of power in the regime,» Aarabi said.

IF KHAMENEI FALLS, WHO TAKES IRAN? STRIKES WILL EXPOSE POWER VACUUM — AND THE IRGC’S GRIP

«His father had created the Bayt’s extensive apparatus as a hidden power structure to ensure continuity should he be eliminated — and through Mojtaba’s appointment, this is exactly what we will get,» Aarabi said.

President Donald Trump also reacted to Mojtaba Khamenei’s rise. In an interview with the New York Post, Trump said he was «not happy with» the younger Khamenei replacing his father as leader of Iran’s theocratic system but declined to elaborate on how the United States might respond. «Not going to tell you,» Trump said when asked about his plans regarding the new supreme leader. «Not going to tell you. I’m not happy with him.»

An Iranian source with knowledge of the leadership transition told Fox News Digital that earlier speculation Mojtaba might pursue reforms now appears unlikely given the circumstances surrounding his appointment.

«Previously there were whispers suggesting that if Mojtaba were to become the leader, he might introduce reforms that would both open up the domestic political space and bring a more interactive approach to foreign policy,» the source said.

«However, now this possibility seems very weak.»

Mojtaba was chosen «amid disputes, controversies, and pressure from the IRGC,» according to the source, meaning he «owes his appointment to their support and therefore cannot act against their wishes.»

TRUMP SAYS IRAN’S SUCCESSION BENCH WIPED OUT AS ISRAELI STRIKE HITS LEADERSHIP DELIBERATIONS

Military members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in western Tehran, Iran (Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Built inside Iran’s security state

Mojtaba Khamenei, 56, has spent decades building influence inside the power structures surrounding Iran’s supreme leader.

Born in 1969 in Mashhad, he pursued clerical studies in Tehran, Iran, after the 1979 Islamic Revolution that brought his father to prominence. Over time, however, analysts say his influence developed less through traditional clerical authority and more through Iran’s security institutions.

In 2019, the United States sanctioned Mojtaba under Executive Order 13867. The U.S. Treasury Department said he had been «representing the supreme leader in an official capacity despite never being elected or appointed to a government position aside from work in the office of his father.»

Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ Iran Program, said Mojtaba’s background reflects a broader shift inside the Islamic Republic.

People hold placards with an image of Iran’s new supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei with late Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, during a gathering to support Mojtaba Khamenei, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 9, 2026.  (Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) Via Reuters)

«Despite donning a turban, Mojtaba is the product of the regime’s national security deep state,» Ben Taleblu told Fox News Digital. «Expect him to work with and through the IRGC to keep his hold on power.»

Aarabi said Mojtaba has spent years consolidating influence behind the scenes.

«His past tells us he enjoys micromanaging every aspect of authority to satisfy his thirst for power,» Aarabi said, describing how Mojtaba allegedly relocated IRGC command centers to his office during protests, engineered election outcomes and installed loyalists across state institutions.

Since 2019, Aarabi added, Mojtaba has also been implementing what he described as his father’s effort to «purify» the regime by promoting ideological loyalists across the political system.

«Mojtaba is a deeply antisemitic, anti-American, and anti-Western ideologue,» Aarabi said. «He has personally been involved in repression in Iran and terror plots abroad.»

IRAN’S SENIOR CLERICS ‘EXPOSED’ AFTER BUILDING STRIKE IN QOM, SUCCESSION CHOICE LOOMS

Kashmiri Shiite Muslims carry pictures of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as they march in a protest rally on the fourth day of mourning in Magam, Jammu and Kashmir, on March 4, 2026. (Faisal Khan/Anadolu/Getty Images)

Analysts see harder line ahead

Analysts say Mojtaba’s rise may further strengthen the role of Iran’s security institutions.

«The rise of the younger Khamenei expedites trendlines seen in Iranian politics and national security for years,» Ben Taleblu said. «From one Khamenei to another, things in Iran can be expected to go from bad to worse if this regime survives.»

«And like the elder Khamenei, corruption runs in the family,» he added.

Ben Taleblu warned that the regime may also escalate tensions externally as a survival strategy.

«The regime knows it is weak, but believes it can extract a price and widen a crisis in order to survive,» he said.

For opposition groups inside Iran, the leadership transition signals continuity rather than reform.

«He’s the son of Khamenei and they have same ideology and they same strategy and they try to continue the same policy,» said Khalid Azizi, spokesperson for the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Iran.

«So far it’s very difficult to say what he will be done and is he going to have a different policy? I don’t expect this.»

The Iranian source who spoke with Fox News Digital said that while engagement with the United States and the West is theoretically possible in the future, the chances remain slim.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

On March 1, 2026, in Sana’a, Yemen. pro-Iran protesters brandish billboards depicting the Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Hosseini Khamenei, flags of Yemen and Iran, weapons, and chant slogans at a rally held to condemn the U.S.-Israel aerial attacks on Iran and the killing of Khamenei and several military officials. (Mohammed Hamoud/Getty Images)

«As I mentioned,» the source said, «this possibility is very weak.»

«In short,» Aarabi said, «Mojtaba is his father on steroids. He’s certainly no MBS.»

In a little over a year, the United States has carried out dozens of airstrikes on vessels in the Caribbean tied to alleged narco-trafficking networks, launched sustained operations against Houthi forces in the Red Sea, captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, struck Iranian nuclear facilities and now embarked on an extended military campaign aimed at degrading Tehran’s missile, drone and command infrastructure.

The tempo marks one of the most assertive stretches of American force projection in recent years, spanning Latin America, the Middle East and critical maritime corridors.

For War Secretary Pete Hegseth, it also represents a striking turn. 

HEGSETH BLASTS BRITS, SAYS IRAN’S CHAOTIC RETALIATION HAS DRIVEN ITS OWN ALLIES ‘INTO THE AMERICAN ORBIT’

Just before the 2024 presidential election, he described himself as a «recovering neocon,» expressing regret over his support for Iraq-era interventionism and warning against open-ended wars.

Several analysts say the defining feature of the administration’s approach may be less about ideological evolution and more about alignment and execution.

«Unlike in Trump one, everyone in Trump’s cabinet now — Hegseth, Rubio, etc. — understands that the president is the boss,» said Matthew Kroenig, a defense strategist at the Atlantic Council. «In Trump 1.0 you had some Cabinet officials who thought their job was to save the Republic from Trump, the so-called adults in the room. And so I think it’s pretty clear the president wanted to go in this direction, and I think Hegseth sees himself as supporting the president’s vision.»

‘Validation of … leadership’ 

That cohesion has coincided with a pattern of risk-taking. 

Several of the administration’s most consequential military moves, from Venezuela to the Houthis to the current Iran campaign, carried the potential for escalation.

Some strategists say the relative absence of early blowback from those interventions may have reinforced the administration’s willingness to escalate into the Iranian theater. 

PENTAGON POLICY CHIEF GRILLED AS DEM CLAIMS TRUMP BROKE PROMISE ABOUT GOING TO WAR WITH IRAN

«I’m not sure I would have advised this,» Kroenig said of the Iran operation. «It is pretty risky, but it’s going well so far.» 

Iranian missile launches have declined in volume. Regional allies have not broken ranks. Whether that constitutes strategic success, however, depends on the metric.

Justin Fulcher, a former Pentagon adviser to Hegseth, argued the early phases of the campaign reflect what he described as a «return to strategic clarity.»

«Deterrence is only credible when our allies actually believe that if President Trump says something, we will back it up,» Fulcher said. «This is a validation of Secretary Hegseth and President Trump’s leadership.»

«Deterrence is only credible when our allies actually believe that if President Trump says something, we will back it up,» former Pentagon advisor Justin Fulcher said. «This is a validation of Secretary Hegseth and President Trump’s leadership.» (Kevin Wolf, File/The Associated Press )

TRUMP SAYS IRAN’S SUCCESSION BENCH WIPED OUT AS ISRAELI STRIKE HITS LEADERSHIP DELIBERATIONS

Hegseth, a former Army officer who served in both Iraq and Afghanistan, has argued that the current campaign bears little resemblance to those conflicts.

«This is not Iraq. This is not endless. I was there for both,» Hegseth said at a press conference in early March. «Our generation knows better and so does this president.»

In a separate interview, he added, «This is not a remaking of Iranian society from an American perspective. We tried that. The American people have rejected that.»

Danielle Pletka, a senior fellow at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute think tank, said the campaign has unfolded largely as expected.

«I think things have gone reasonably well,» Pletka said, pointing to degraded air defenses and what she described as repeated miscalculations by Iran. «All they’ve really done is made everybody quite mad, and that was a really bad calculation on their part.»

At the same time, she cautioned against interpreting the administration’s actions as part of a fixed doctrine.

«I don’t think that it is doctrinal,» Pletka said. «I think this is ad hoc.»

Some longtime Trump supporters have said the current conflict is not what they expected from Trump, who campaigned on ending wars and «America First.»

«It feels like the worst betrayal this time because it comes from the very man and the admin who we all believed was different and said no more,» Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., wrote on X.  «Instead, we get a war with Iran on behalf of Israel that will succeed in regime in Iran. Another foreign war for foreign people for foreign regime change. For what?» 

In Pletka’s view, the president has shown a pattern of attempting diplomacy first and shifting to force only when he concludes negotiations are unserious. She argues that posture distinguishes the current moment from past interventions.

She also emphasized that much of the operational credit belongs to the professional military.

«The planning behind this is credit to the U.S. military and to the CENTCOM commander and to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs,» she said.

That distinction complicates efforts to attribute the current posture solely to Hegseth’s personal worldview. While the defense secretary has become a public face of the administration’s deterrence messaging, the execution of high-tempo campaigns rests heavily with career military leadership. 

Some critics argue the administration has yet to clearly articulate an end state for the Iran campaign.

«Pete Hegseth needs to check with his boss on what the objective is,» former national security advisor John Bolton recently said on CNN. «How does Hegseth explain that we’ve already changed the regime, which wasn’t our objective? I think the Pentagon top leadership, civilian top leadership, needs some attitude adjustment. I think the military’s doing fine, but I wonder about the civilian leadership.»

The White House pushed back forcefully on criticism of the campaign. 

Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson, said Monday that Hegseth «is doing an incredible job leading the Department of War,» pointing to what she described as the «ongoing success of Operation Epic Fury» and other missions. 

Kelly said Iranian retaliatory attacks «have declined by 90 percent because the Department of War is destroying Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities,» and added that Hegseth works «in lockstep with President Trump every day» to ensure the U.S. military «continues to be the greatest, most powerful fighting force in the world.»

The Pentagon echoed that assessment. 

«Operation Epic Fury continues to advance with overwhelming success and precision,» Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell said, describing a «resolute, full-spectrum campaign» aimed at the «total dismantlement of Iran’s terrorist network or its unconditional surrender.»

Others see the moment in broader historical terms.

Peter Doran, a foreign policy analyst, described the campaign as a potential attempt to «end a 47-year war» waged by the Islamic Republic against the United States, but on Washington’s terms.

U.S. Central Command released footage showing strikes on Iranian mobile missile launchers. (@CENTCOM via X)

«This is a clear effort to end a 47-year war that Iran has been waging against the United States,» Doran said.

He argued that visible American military performance could reverberate beyond the Middle East, particularly in Beijing.

«They look good,» Doran said of U.S. forces. «That will serve, I hope, as a disincentive for adventurism.»

If the operation ultimately succeeds in significantly degrading Iran’s military infrastructure, Doran argued, it could reshape the Middle East and expand diplomatic opportunities such as broader Arab-Israeli normalization.

«It changes everything in the Middle East,» he said.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Yet even supporters acknowledge that long-term effects remain uncertain. In Venezuela, Maduro’s removal marked a dramatic shift in U.S. policy, but the governing apparatus he built remains largely intact. Degrading missile stockpiles and drone infrastructure in Iran may buy time, but whether it produces durable deterrence or simply postpones reconstitution remains to be seen.

For now, the administration’s willingness to take calculated risks and its ability to avoid immediate escalation have reinforced the perception of restored American assertiveness. Whether that assertiveness translates into lasting strategic gains will likely define Hegseth’s tenure far more than the rhetoric that preceded it.

Hegseth and the Pentagon did not respond to requests for comment. 

La ciencia suma una nueva evidencia sobre la conexión que hay entre el ejercicio físico y el funcionamiento cerebral.

Un estudio encabezado por científicos de la Universidad de Iowa en los Estados Unidos con colegas de Canadá y Austria comprobó que una sola sesión de ejercicio físico puede desencadenar un aumento en la actividad neuronal de las redes cerebrales relacionadas con el aprendizaje y la memoria.

Los resultados fueron publicados en la revista especializada Brain Communications de Oxford Academic.

El equipo, liderado por Michelle Voss, profesora y fellow de la Facultad de Psicología y Ciencias del Cerebro de la Universidad de Iowa, trabajó con 14 pacientes de entre 17 y 50 años tratados en el centro médico universitario por epilepsia.

El hallazgo aporta evidencia concreta sobre cómo el movimiento físico puede tener efectos inmediatos sobre el cerebro humano.

Hasta ahora, la mayoría de los estudios sobre este vínculo se habían hecho en animales o con métodos indirectos en personas, pero no se había logrado observar de manera directa la actividad cerebral tras el ejercicio.

La investigación midió la actividad cerebral antes y después de que los participantes usaran una bicicleta fija durante 20 minutos, a una intensidad que pudieran sostener.

Para registrar los cambios, se utilizó electroencefalografía intracraneal (iEEG), con electrodos implantados en el cerebro.

Los científicos observaron que después del ejercicio aumentó la frecuencia de las ondas cerebrales de alta frecuencia conocidas como “ripples”.

Estas oscilaciones eléctricas, que se detectan en la actividad cerebral y suelen encontrarse entre los 80 y 500 Hz, surgen en el hipocampo y se conectan con áreas corticales relacionadas con el aprendizaje y la memoria.

“Durante años se sabía que el ejercicio físico suele ser beneficioso para funciones cognitivas como la memoria, y ese beneficio se asocia a cambios en la salud cerebral, principalmente a partir de estudios conductuales e imágenes cerebrales no invasivas”, explicó Voss.

Añadió: “Al registrar directamente la actividad cerebral, nuestro estudio demuestra, por primera vez en humanos, que incluso una sola sesión de ejercicio puede modificar rápidamente los ritmos neuronales y las redes cerebrales implicadas en la memoria y la función cognitiva”.

Las ondas “ripples” ya habían sido documentadas en animales como ratones y ratas, pero hasta este trabajo no se había comprobado su vínculo con la memoria en humanos, ya que su registro requiere electrodos implantados.

Anteriormente, la hipótesis sobre el papel de estas ondas en personas se basaba en estudios que analizaban los cambios en el flujo sanguíneo cerebral tras el ejercicio. El uso de iEEG permitió a los investigadores ver por primera vez la actividad neuronal directamente después de la actividad física.

La investigación incluyó a pacientes con epilepsia porque ya contaban con los electrodos implantados por motivos clínicos.

Sin embargo, Voss remarcó que los resultados “coinciden con lo que se ha observado en adultos sanos usando imágenes cerebrales no invasivas, como la resonancia magnética funcional (fMRI)”.

Para la investigadora, “esa convergencia entre métodos tan diferentes es una de las mayores pruebas de que los efectos no son exclusivos de la epilepsia, sino que reflejan una respuesta general del cerebro humano al ejercicio”.

El trabajo contó con la colaboración de Araceli Cárdenas, del Hospital de Toronto Oeste, y Juan Ramírez-Villegas, del Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de Austria.

También participaron científicos de la la Universidad Estatal de Ohio y la Universidad de Wisconsin-Madison, en EE.UU.

Los investigadores buscan consolidar la relación entre ejercicio y memoria en el cerebro al realizar pruebas de memoria después de la sesión de ejercicio, mientras se registra en directo la actividad cerebral. El financiamiento del estudio provino de la Universidad de Iowa.

El equipo espera que sus hallazgos amplíen el conocimiento sobre cómo la actividad física impacta la salud cerebral y sirvan para nuevas estrategias en la prevención y tratamiento de trastornos de la memoria.