Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

GOP push to make Trump’s 2017 tax cuts permanent, say going back would be a ‘dramatic’ change for many

Published

on


Tax season is done. 

And this year, Congressional Republicans converted tax season to «sales» season. Republicans and President Donald Trump are pushing to approve a bill to reauthorize his 2017 tax cut package. Otherwise, those taxes expire later this year.

Advertisement

«We absolutely have to make the tax cuts permanent,» said Rep. Tom Tiffany, R-Wis., on FOX Business.

«We’ve got to get the renewal of the President’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. That’s absolutely essential,» said Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., on FOX Business.

Rates for nearly every American spike if Congress doesn’t act within the next few months.

Advertisement

CONFIDENCE IN DEMOCRATS HITS ALL TIME LOW IN NEW POLL

house speaker mike johnson

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., talks with the media after the House passed the budget resolution on Thursday, April 10, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

«We are trying to avoid tax increases on the most vulnerable populations in our country,» said Rep. Beth Van Duyne, R-Texas, a member of the House Ways and Means Committee which determines tax policy. «I am trying to avoid a recession.»

If Congress stumbles, the non-partisan Tax Foundation estimates that a married couple with two children – earning $165,000 a year – is slapped with an extra $2,400 in taxes. A single parent with no kids making $75,000 annually could see a $1,700 upcharge on their tax bill. A single parent with two children bringing home $52,000 a year gets slapped with an additional $1,400 in taxes a year.

Advertisement

«Pretty significant. That’s an extra mortgage payment or extra rent payment,» said Daniel Bunn of the non-partisan Tax Foundation. «People have been kind of used to living with the policies that are currently in law for almost eight years now. And the shift back to the policy that was prior to the 2017 tax cuts would be a dramatic tax increase for many.»

But technically, Republicans aren’t cutting taxes.

«As simple as I can make this bill. It is about keeping tax rates the same,» said Sen. James Lankford, R-Oklahoma, on Fox.

Advertisement

Congress had to write the 2017 tax reduction bill in a way so that the reductions would expire this year. That was for accounting purposes. Congress didn’t have to count the tax cuts against the deficit thanks to some tricky number-crunching mechanisms – so long as they expired within a multi-year window. But the consequence was that taxes could climb if lawmakers failed to renew the old reductions.

«It sunsets and so you just automatically go back to the tax levels prior to 2017,» said Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.

A recent Fox News poll found that 45% of those surveyed – and 44% of independents believe the rich don’t pay enough taxes.

Advertisement

Democrats hope to turn outrage about the perceived tax disparity against Trump.

«He wants his billionaire buddies to get an even bigger tax break. Is that disgraceful?» asked Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., at a rally in New York.

«Disgrace!» shouted someone in the crowd.

Advertisement

«Disgraceful! Disgraceful!» followed up Schumer.

senate minority leader chuck schumer

U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., (R) speaks alongside Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., (L) to reporters during a news conference on the impacts of the Republican budget proposal at the U.S. Capitol on April 10, 2025 in Washington, DC.  (Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)

Some Republicans are now exploring raising rates on the wealthy or corporations. There’s been chatter on Capitol Hill and in the administration about exploring an additional set of tax brackets.

«I don’t believe the president has made a determination on whether he supports it or not,» said White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt.

Advertisement

«We’re going to see where the President is» on this, said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent while traveling in Argentina. «Everything is on the table.»

A Treasury spokesperson then clarified Bessent’s remarks.

«What’s off the table is a $4.4 trillion tax increase on the American people,» said the spokesperson. «Additionally, corporate tax cuts will set off a manufacturing boom and rapidly grow the U.S. economy again.»

Advertisement

Top Congressional GOP leaders dismissed the idea.

«I’m not a big fan of doing that,» said House Speaker Mike Johnson on Fox. «I mean we’re the Republican party and we’re for tax reduction for everyone.»

FEDERAL JUDGE TEMPORARILY RESTRICTS DOGE ACCESS TO PERSONALIZED SOCIAL SECURITY DATA

Advertisement

«I don’t support that initiative,» said House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., on FOX Business, before adding «everything’s on the table.»

But if you’re President Donald Trump and the GOP, consider the politics of creating a new corporate tax rate or hiking taxes on the well-to-do. 

Capitol Dome 119th Congress

Sunrise light hits the U.S. Capitol dome on Thursday, January 2, 2025, as the 119th Congress is set to begin Friday. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

The president has expanded the GOP base. Republicans are no longer the party of the «wealthy.» Manual laborers, shop and storekeepers and small business persons now comprise Trump’s GOP. So maintaining these tax cuts helps with that working-class core. Raising taxes on the wealthy would help Republicans pay for the tax cuts and reduce the hit on the deficit. And it would shield Republicans from the Democrats’ argument that the tax cuts are for the rich.

Advertisement

Congress is now in the middle of a two-week recess for Passover and Easter. GOP lawmakers and staff are working behind the scenes to actually write the bill. No one knows exactly what will be in the bill. Trump promised no taxes on tips for food service workers. There is also talk of no taxes on overtime. 

WHITE HOUSE PHOTO BLUNTLY SHOWS WHERE PARTIES STAND ON IMMIGRATION AMID ABREGO GARCIA DEPORTATION

Republicans from high-tax states like New York and Pennsylvania want to see a reduction of «SALT.» That’s where taxpayers can write off «state and local taxes.» This provision is crucial to secure the support of Republicans like Reps. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., and Mike Lawler, R-N.Y. But including the SALT reduction also increases the deficit.

Advertisement

So what will the bill look like?

«Minor adjustments within that are naturally on the table,» said Rounds. «The key though, [is] 218 in the House and 51 in the Senate.»

In other words, it’s about the math. Republicans need to develop the right legislative brew which commands just the right amount of votes in both chambers to pass. That could mean including certain provisions – or dumping others. It’s challenging. Especially with the slim House majority.

Advertisement
protests against tax cuts

People attend a press conference and rally in support of fair taxation near the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. on April 10, 2025.  (Bryan Dozier / Middle East Images / Middle East Images via AFP)

«There were trade-offs and offsets within that bill that many people are dissatisfied with,» said Bunn of the 2017 bill. «And it’s not clear how the package is going to come together with those various trade-offs.»

Johnson wants the bill complete by Memorial Day. Republicans know this enterprise can’t drag on too late into the year. Taxpayers would see a tax increase – even if it’s temporary – if working out the bill stretches into the fall when the IRS begins to prepare for the next tax season.

It’s also thought that finishing this sooner rather than later would provide some stability to the volatile stock markets. Establishing tax policy for next year would calm anxieties about the nation’s economic outlook.

Advertisement

«The big, beautiful bill,» Trump calls it, adding he wants the legislation done «soon.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

And that’s why tax season is now sales season. Both to the lawmakers. And to the public.

Advertisement

Politics,Taxes,Congress,Donald Trump

Advertisement
Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Hillary Clinton tells House ‘I do not recall ever encountering’ Jeffrey Epstein

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is accusing the GOP-led House Oversight Committee of using her to «distract» from President Donald Trump during her high-stakes testimony in Congress’ Jeffrey Epstein probe.

Advertisement

«A committee endeavoring to stop human trafficking would seek to understand what specific steps are needed to fix a system that allowed Epstein to get away with his crimes in 2008,» she is telling the panel, according to her opening remarks.

«But that’s not happening. Instead, you have compelled me to testify, fully aware that I have no knowledge that would assist your investigation, in order to distract attention from President Trump’s actions and to cover them up despite legitimate calls for answers.»

Clinton is telling lawmakers, «As I stated in my sworn declaration on January 13, I had no idea about their criminal activities.»

Advertisement

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is appearing before the House Oversight Committee. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

«I do not recall ever encountering Mr. Epstein. I never flew on his plane or visited his island homes or offices. I have nothing to add to that,» her remarks state.

«Like every decent person, I have been horrified by what we have learned about their crimes. It’s unfathomable that Mr. Epstein initially got a slap on the wrist in 2008, which allowed him to continue his predatory practices for another decade.»

Advertisement

The House Oversight Committee’s deposition is officially kicking off on Thursday morning after months of back-and-forth.

«No one’s accusing, at this moment, the Clintons of any wrongdoing. They’re going to have due process,» Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., told reporters shortly before it began. «But we have a lot of questions, and the purpose of the whole investigation is to try to understand many things about Epstein.»

SON OF NORWAY’S CROWN PRINCESS TO FACE RAPE CHARGES AS NEW EPSTEIN FILES MENTION HER HUNDREDS OF TIMES

Advertisement

Hillary Clinton’s deposition comes a day before her husband, former President Bill Clinton, will testify before the panel as well.

«Today will be a long deposition, I would assume, and tomorrow will be an even longer deposition,» Comer said.

Both Democrats and Republicans on the committee, as well as the panel’s staff, traveled to the Clintons’ hometown of Chappaqua, New York for the two-day affair.

Advertisement
Comer addresses the press after Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., speaks to reporters after a closed-door deposition with Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend and confidante of sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 9, 2026. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo)

It’s part of an agreement struck between the GOP-led panel and the former first couple’s lawyers in order for them to appear in person.

Lawmakers on either side will have the opportunity to question Hillary Clinton in addition to their staffs. 

Fox News Digital was told that Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., will be the first lawmaker to question the former first lady and Obama administration official.

Advertisement

Mace was one of four House Republicans who successfully forced a vote late last year on getting the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release files on Epstein, despite pressure from GOP leaders.

The South Carolina Republican, who is running for governor of the Palmetto State, told reporters on Thursday that she would also be questioning Hillary Clinton on Trump Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, among other names that have been mentioned in relation to Epstein.

Comer told reporters she would also be questioned on her ties to Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, pointing out that Maxwell was present at Chelsea Clinton’s wedding in 2010, after the first allegations against Epstein surfaced.

Advertisement

He also suggested that Epstein and Maxwell’s ties to the nonprofit Clinton Foundation would also see scrutiny.

Trump listens in a meeting in January 2026

President Donald Trump listens during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on Jan. 29, 2026. (Evan Vucci/AP Photo)

«Again, we’re not accusing Hillary Clinton of wrongdoing. We know that Jeffrey Epstein said many times in emails that he was the first person to raise money for the Clinton initiative, the Clinton Foundation, that he solicited money at some of his properties for the Clinton Foundation,» Comer said. 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«Again, that’s not saying anything illegal, but there are a lot of questions pertaining to Secretary Clinton with respect to Epstein and his involvement in the Clinton initiative and her relationship with with Ghislaine Maxwell.»

But Clinton’s prepared remarks show her accusing Republicans of going on a «fishing expedition» to find information that is not there.

«If this committee is serious about learning the truth about Epstein’s trafficking crimes, it would not rely on press giggles to get answers from our current president on his involvement. It would ask him directly, under oath, about the tens of thousands of times who showed up in the Epstein files. If the majority was serious, it would not waste time on fishing expeditions. There is too much that needs to be done,» her remarks said.

Advertisement

Neither of the Clintons has been accused of wrongdoing related to Epstein, nor has Trump. But both the current and former president’s names appear in the Epstein files numerous times, alongside other well-known figures like Bill Gates and Leslie Wexner.

Related Article

Clintons cave: Comer says Bill and Hillary to testify in Epstein probe

politics,house of representatives politics,jeffrey epstein,hillary clinton

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Russia warns against ‘provocative actions’ around Cuba after 4 killed onboard US-registered speedboat

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Russia warned Thursday against any «provocative actions» around Cuba after a shootout between the country’s coast guard and a U.S.-registered speedboat that left at least 4 dead. 

Advertisement

The remark comes after Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. was «going to have our own information» on Wednesday’s incident, and that «we’ll respond appropriately based on what that information tells us.» 

«The situation around Cuba, as we can see, is heating up. The main thing is the humanitarian component. All humanitarian issues concerning Cuban citizens must be resolved, and no one should create obstacles,» Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Thursday, according to Reuters. 

«As for security around the island, it is, of course, very important that everyone remain restrained and refrain from any provocative actions,» he added.

Advertisement

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, left, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. (Maxim Shemetov/Reuters; Ken Cedeno/Reuters)

Cuban officials say five service members approached the Florida-registered speedboat detected within Cuban territorial waters. Occupants then opened fire on Cuban troops, who returned fire, according to the Cuban foreign ministry.  The ministry reported that «four aggressors on the foreign vessel were killed and six were injured.» The Cuban vessel’s commander was also injured, according to the ministry.

Cuban officials also claimed the 10 passengers on the Florida-registered boat were armed Cubans living in the U.S. who were trying to infiltrate the island and unleash terrorism. 

Advertisement

Cuba’s government added that the majority of the 10 people on the boat «have a known history of criminal and violent activity,» The Associated Press reported. 

According to data retrieved by Fox News Digital, the vessel, registered in Florida with number FL7726SH, is a 24-foot Pro-Line boat.

CHINA SLAMS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION OVER US SANCTIONS ON CUBA

Advertisement
Cuban Coast Guard

The Cuban Coast Guard tows a boat attempting to leave the country in Havana in December 2022. (Yamil Lage/AFP via Getty Images)

«Suffice it to say, it is highly unusual to see shootouts in the open sea like that. It’s not something that happens every day. It’s something, frankly, that hasn’t happened with Cuba in a very long time. But we’re going to find out,» Rubio said Wednesday. «We’re not going to base our conclusions on what they’ve told us. And I’m very, very confident that we will know the full story of what happened here, and we will know it soon. And then, you know, we’ll respond appropriately based on what that information tells us.» 

U.S. Attorney Jason Reding Quiñones from the Southern District of Florida also said Wednesday that, «Today’s reports indicate that four people aboard a Florida-registered vessel were killed and several others wounded during a deadly gunfire exchange off the coast of Cuba. This is a tragic and deeply concerning event. The Cuban regime asserts their forces were fired upon, but the facts remain unclear and conflicting.»

Marco Rubio

Secretary of State Marco Rubio called Wednesday’s incident «highly unusual.» (Kevin Mohatt/Reuters)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«We are using all available federal tools to understand exactly what happened, who was involved, and whether U.S. citizens or lawful residents were among the casualties. We are committed to a thorough, impartial, and fact-based investigation,» he added. 

Fox News Digital’s Rachel Wolf, Emma Bussey and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Advertisement

Related Article

Rubio calls Cuban shootout with stolen speedboat 'highly unusual,' withholds judgment



cuba,russia,florida,caribbean region,marco rubio,world

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

En medio de la crisis política por el caso Epstein, el gobierno de Keir Starmer enfrenta una elección clave en Gran Bretaña

Published

on


En medio de la enorme crisis royal y política que existe en Gran Bretaña por el caso Epstein, el primer ministro Sir Keir Starmer y su partido laborista se juegan su futuro este jueves en una elección parcial, en la tradicional “zona roja” laborista del norte del reino.

En Gorton y Denton, cerca de Manchester, los laboristas están asediados por Reform, el partido de ultraderecha populista de Nigel Farage, y el partido Verde, en una banca que antes era tradicionalmente laborista.

Advertisement

Las encuestas ubican al Partido Laborista en un empate técnico hasta ahora. Ya han comenzado a votar.

Las elecciones parciales de Gorton y Denton son la mayor prueba electoral hasta la fecha para Starmer, antes de lo que se prevén resultados desastrosos para el Partido Laborista en las elecciones locales de mayo.

Elección clave para el primer ministro

Advertisement

Si el Partido Laborista pierde, volverá a poner en evidencia la decisión de Starmer de impedir que Andy Burnham, alcalde del Gran Manchester, se presentara al escaño. Starmer bloqueó que fuera candidato cuando es uno de los líderes laboristas más populares en el país.

Independientemente del resultado, esto tiene importantes implicaciones para el mandato de Starmer, pero también para el panorama político en general.

Una victoria del candidato populista anti inmigrante de Reform UK, Matt Goodwin, sería la mayor señal hasta la fecha de que la ventaja de Nigel Farage en las encuestas refleja la verdadera intención de voto, y no un simple símbolo de insatisfacción con el gobierno.

Advertisement

Goodwin rara vez habla de la política de Reform UK ni de asuntos locales. Ha convertido la lucha en un referéndum sobre el liderazgo de Starmer en repetidas ocasiones.

Gorton y Denton ocupa el puesto 440 en la lista de candidatos a los que Reform aspira, según una fuente interna. El partido ganó las elecciones parciales de Runcorn y Helsby hace casi un año por tan solo seis votos.

Una victoria en esta zona indicaría que mantiene su impulso. Reform afirmó que esperaba que al menos 1.000 activistas salieran a votar, especialmente personas que no suelen votar, quienes han sido clave para lograr otras victorias en elecciones parciales.

Advertisement
Carteles del Partido Laborista en la zona de Longsight, en Manchester, Gran Bretaña, este jueves. Foto: EFE

Goodwin es un candidato que divide y muy activo en internet, con raíces familiares en Manchester. Pero que pasó la mayor parte de su vida adulta en el sureste de Inglaterra.

Una victoria reformista destrozaría el argumento de los estrategas laboristas de que los progresistas se unirán para derrotar a los reformistas cuando sepan votar tácticamente.

Habría feroces recriminaciones entre los laboristas y los verdes. Los «Green» podrían argumentar, si quedan en segundo lugar, que fueron los laboristas quienes dividieron el voto progresista e impidieron la victoria verde. Si los laboristas quedan en tercer lugar, es difícil imaginar cómo Starmer sobrevivirá mucho más tiempo como primer ministro si no puede unir a los progresistas contra candidatos como Goodwin.

Una victoria de los Verdes podría ser el resultado más catastrófico para el liderazgo de Starmer y demostraría que los Verdes son una fuerza progresista seria, no un voto de protesta.

Advertisement

También demostraría que el Partido Laborista no se beneficia automáticamente de una alianza anti reformista. Haría que los diputados que se presentan a los escaños urbanos teman la amenaza de los Verdes, que probablemente se verá agravada por los resultados de las elecciones locales en Londres.

Esta es una de las zonas con mayor diversidad étnica de Manchester. Según datos del censo, más de la mitad de los residentes de Longsight son musulmanes. Tiene el porcentaje más bajo de residentes blancos de la ciudad (23%) y el mayor número de residentes que no hablan inglés (unas 371 personas).

Para atraer a estos votantes, que forman parte de la circunscripción de Gorton y Denton y que acudirán este jueves a las urnas, el Partido Verde ha estado publicando material en idiomas como el urdu y el bengalí, que insta a los residentes a «castigar» al Partido Laborista por Gaza. Muchos de los votantes son de origen paquistaní, Kashmirs o indios.

Advertisement

Las posibilidades del Partido Verde

Las encuestas y las casas de apuestas británicas dan repetidamente a los Verdes por delante. Una victoria sugeriría que la entusiasta campaña de Hannah Spencer significa que podrían aprovechar un aumento en el número de votantes progresistas desilusionados.

La coalición Verde podría atraer a antiguos votantes laboristas enojados, que quieren darle una paliza a Starmer. Muchos de ellos, aunque no todos, pertenecen a la numerosa comunidad musulmana de la zona, así como a estudiantes y jóvenes profesionales de Levenshulme.

Advertisement
Un cartel llama a votar a los Verdes para frenar a los reformistas, en Manchester, Gran Bretaña. Foto: EFE

Los ataques laboristas contra Los Verdes han sido feroces, tanto por su política de drogas, alegando que el partido está dispuesto a vender drogas legalizadas a adolescentes, como por su política de defensa, refiriéndose al partido como «los idiotas útiles de Putin».

Nueva militancia

Los Verdes han movilizado repetidamente a grandes grupos de activistas y han tenido que trabajar la banca desde cero.

Han enviado cartas escritas a mano a todos los votantes de la circunscripción, completadas por 300 voluntarios. Los activistas han hecho campaña frente a las mezquitas durante los rezos, centrándose en la actuación del Partido Laborista en Gaza, y han distribuido folletos en varios idiomas.

Advertisement

Algunos aspectos de la campaña de los Verdes han suscitado controversia, como el uso de imágenes de Starmer reuniéndose con el primer ministro indio, Narendra Modi, en anuncios dirigidos a la comunidad musulmana de la zona.

La fuerza de la campaña de los Verdes ha permitido al partido argumentar que es el Partido Laborista el que corre el riesgo de dividir el voto y dejar entrar al candidato reformista.

Si el Partido Laborista queda relegado al tercer puesto, habría recriminaciones para Starmer. Pero si el reformismo gana y los Verdes quedan en segundo lugar, eso generaría inquietud en la izquierda progresista sobre qué partido es el mejor rival para la derecha populista.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias