Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Government, regulatory failures made London’s Grenfell Tower a ‘death trap,’ report says

Published

on


A damning report on a deadly London high-rise fire concluded Wednesday that decades of failures by government, regulators and industry turned Grenfell Tower into a «death trap» where 72 people lost their lives.

The public inquiry into the 2017 blaze found no «single cause» of the tragedy, but said a combination of dishonest companies, weak or incompetent regulators and complacent government led the building to be covered in combustible cladding that turned a small apartment fire into the deadliest blaze on British soil since World War II.

The inquiry’s head, retired judge Martin Moore-Bick, said the deaths were avoidable and «all contributed to it in one way or another, in most cases through incompetence but in some cases through dishonesty and greed.»

Prime Minister Keir Starmer apologized on behalf of the British state, saying the tragedy «should never have happened» and promising to act on the report’s recommendations.

10 DEAD, OTHERS IN CRITICAL CONDITION AFTER MIGRANT VESSEL REPORTEDLY CAPSIZES IN ENGLISH CHANNEL

«Today is a long-awaited day for truth but it must now lead to a day of justice,» he told Parliament.

Advertisement

While the report may give survivors some of the answers they have long sought, they must wait to see whether anyone responsible will be prosecuted. Police will examine the inquiry’s conclusions before deciding on charges, which could include corporate or individual manslaughter.

They say prosecutions are unlikely before late 2026.

Natasha Elcock of the group Grenfell United urged authorities to deliver justice.

«We paid the price for systematic dishonesty, institutional indifference and neglect,» said Elcock, a survivor who lost her uncle in the fire.

FILE – A resident in a nearby building watches smoke rise from the Grenfell Tower building on fire in London, Wednesday, June 14, 2017. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham, File)

The fire broke out in the early hours of June 14, 2017, in a fourth-floor apartment and raced up the 25-story building like a lit fuse, fueled by flammable cladding panels on the exterior walls.

The tragedy horrified the nation and posed one central question, the report said: «How was it possible in 21st century London for a reinforced concrete building, itself structurally impervious to fire, to be turned into a death trap?»

Advertisement

The search for answers focused on a refurbishment completed in 2016 that covered the 1970s building in aluminum and polyethylene cladding — a layer of foam insulation topped by two sheets of aluminum sandwiched around a layer of polyethylene, a combustible plastic polymer that melts and drips on exposure to heat.

The report was highly critical of companies that made the cladding. It said they engaged in «systematic dishonesty,» manipulating safety tests and misrepresenting the results to claim the material was safe.

It said insulation manufacturer Celotex was unscrupulous, and another insulation firm, Kingspan, «cynically exploited the industry’s lack of detailed knowledge.» Cladding panel maker Arconic «concealed from the market the true extent of the danger,» the report said.

The three companies expressed sympathies to the bereaved, but all denied responsibility for the deaths. Arconic said its products were not unsafe. Kingspan said its «historical failings» were not «causative of the tragedy.» Celotex said the decision to combine its insulation with combustible cladding panels had been made by others.

The inquiry said the combustible cladding was used because it was cheap and because of «incompetence of the organizations and individuals involved in the refurbishment» -– including architects, engineers and contractors — who all thought safety was someone else’s responsibility.

It concluded the failures multiplied because bodies in charge of enforcing building standards were weak, the local authority was uninterested and the «complacent» U.K. government — led in the seven years before the fire by the Conservative Party — ignored safety warnings because of a commitment to deregulation.

The inquiry has held more than 300 public hearings and examined around 1,600 witness statements.

Advertisement

An initial report published in 2019 criticized the fire department for initially telling residents to stay put and await rescue. By the time the advice was changed, it was too late for many on the upper floors to escape.

London Fire Brigade came in for further criticism for a «chronic lack of effective management and leadership,» poor training in high-rise fires and outdated communications equipment.

The Grenfell tragedy prompted soul-searching about inequality in Britain. Grenfell was a public housing building set in one of London’s richest neighborhoods, near the pricey boutiques and elegant houses of Notting Hill. The victims, largely people of color, came from 23 countries and included taxi drivers and architects, a poet, an acclaimed young artist, retirees and 18 children.

The report said the inquiry had «seen no evidence that any of the decisions that resulted in the creation of a dangerous building or the calamitous spread of fire were affected by racial or social prejudice,» though it said the public body that managed Grenfell had failed to treat residents with «understanding and respect.»

The prime minister said the tragedy «poses fundamental questions about the kind of country we are, a country where the voices of working class people and of those of color have been repeatedly ignored and dismissed.»

After the fire, the U.K. government banned metal composite cladding panels for new buildings and ordered similar combustible cladding to be removed from hundreds of tower blocks across the country. But the work hasn’t been carried out on some apartment buildings because of wrangling over who should pay.

Starmer said the work had been «far, far too slow.»

Advertisement

The report made multiple recommendations, including tougher fire safety rules, a national fire and rescue college and a single independent regulator for the construction industry to replace the current mishmash of bodies.

The ruined tower, which stood for months after the fire like a black tombstone on the west London skyline, still stands, covered in white sheeting. A green heart and the words «Grenfell forever in our hearts» are emblazoned at the top.

Sandra Ruiz, whose 12-year-old niece, Jessica Urbano Ramirez, died in the fire, said that «for me, there’s no justice without people going behind bars.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«Our lives were shattered on that night. People need to be held accountable,» she said. «People who have made decisions putting profit above people’s safety need to be behind bars.»


Advertisement
Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Crisis política en Colombia: ahora renuncia el ministro de Defensa y Gustavo Petro pierde a uno de sus colaboradores más leales

Published

on


El ministro de Defensa de Colombia, Iván Velásquez, renunció el martes a su cargo de manera “irrevocable” en medio de la reorganización ministerial que está impulsando el presidente Gustavo Petro luego de que quedaran al descubierto las tensiones internas en el gobierno en una inédita reunión televisada.

La dimisión fue informada en la red social X por el Ministerio de Defensa en un breve comunicado de prensa en el que no se detallaron las razones de su decisión.

Velásquez era el único ministro que se había mantenido en su cargo desde que Petro asumió en agosto de 2022 como el primer presidente de izquierda en gobernar Colombia. Había resistido al menos tres remezones ministeriales y tenía a su cargo la política de seguridad, clave en un país donde persisten los grupos armados ilegales.

El ministro de Defensa que dimitió tiene una larga trayectoria en la investigación de corrupción y estructuras criminales y presidió la Comisión Internacional Contra la Impunidad en Guatemala.

Su salida se da luego de que Petro pidiera el domingo a todos sus ministros y jefes de departamentos la renuncia protocolar para ajustar, según dijo, y lograr un mayor cumplimiento de su plan de gobierno. Sin embargo, antes de que pidiera la renuncia habían dimitido dos de sus altos funcionarios inconformes por las tensiones internas.

Gustavo Petro con su ahora ex ministro de Defensa, Ivan Velásquez, en una imagen de 2024. Foto: AP

Así como Velásquez, renunciaron dos ministras de la entraña del proyecto político progresista de Petro: las ministras de Ambiente, Susana Muhamad, y de Trabajo, Gloria Ramírez, del partido Comunista.

Advertisement

El trasfondo de la crisis

Ambas manifestaron en sus cartas de renuncia o entrevistas a medios locales que estaban inconformes del rumbo que estaba tomando el gobierno. Muhamad fue explícita en decir que su salida se debe al nombramiento de Armando Benedetti como jefe de despacho presidencial.

Benedetti, quien fue la mano derecha de Petro en la campaña presidencial de 2022, ha sido cuestionado por un presunto caso de violencia de género y audios filtrados que señalan supuestas irregularidades en la campaña electoral con la que Petro llegó al poder. También fue acusado por presunto tráfico de influencias por la Corte Suprema de Justicia en una investigación relacionada con su supuesta intervención indebida en procesos de contratación en un fondo estatal.

El funcionario ha negado los cuestionamientos y también el delito de corrupción. Mientras que Petro lo defendió públicamente asegurando que todos merecen una segunda oportunidad.

La tensión queda al descubierto cuando Petro atraviesa el último tramo de su mandato, que debe terminar por ley en 2026, con el gran desafío de dejar un legado que le permita a la izquierda continuar en el poder.

Sucede también cuando lucha por lograr que sus ambiciosas reformas sociales al sistema de salud y de trabajo sean aprobadas por un esquivo Congreso en el que no goza de las mayorías.

Para Petro, el remezón ministerial tiene de fondo las salidas de quienes tienen aspiraciones para el próximo año de elecciones legislativas y presidenciales, que considera incompatibles con su desempeño en el gobierno.

Advertisement

“Está todo listo, no hay de qué preocuparse, no va a ser tampoco un gran cambio de ministerios, muchos van a permanecer”, dijo Petro el martes a la prensa desde Emiratos Árabes. “Lo que hacemos es quitar las personas que tengan aspiraciones electorales, no es sano que se combinen… ya queremos separar esas aguas”, explicó.

Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias

Copyright © 2024 - NDM Noticias del Momento - #Noticias #Chimentos #Politica #Fútbol #Economia #Sociedad