INTERNACIONAL
Los relatos de las ocho cuadras frenéticas de un ómnibus que perdió el control y terminó en la playa de Montevideo

La imagen fue impactante: un ómnibus perdió el control, atravesó la rambla de Montevideo y terminó en la playa. Ese sábado, previo a las elecciones nacionales de Uruguay, la presencia de un bus en la arena llamaba la atención de cualquiera que pasara por la costanera de la capital uruguaya. El accidente sería fatal: con el paso de los días se confirmaría que una mujer falleció como consecuencia de las lesiones que sufrió.
El accidente ocurrió hace prácticamente medio año y, con el paso de los meses, los pasajeros comenzaron a contar sus relatos. Además, hay varios procesos judiciales abiertos.
Además de un juicio que busca responsabilidades penales, los damnificados por el accidente del ómnibus de la empresa Cutcsa pueden acudir a la Justicia civil en busca de una indemnización económica, informó semanas atrás el noticiero Telemundo de Canal 12.
“Es complicado continuar después de lo que pasó porque quieras o no tenés el miedo de que pase otra vez. O la incertidumbre de estar arriba un ómnibus te acompaña por el resto de tu vida. Cutcsa nunca se comunicó con ninguno de nosotros para ver cómo estábamos”, contó a ese medio Matías Muniz, uno de los pasajeros.
La oferta de la empresa como indemnización fue de USD 700. “Son cifras muy bajas y simbólicas. Es un valor simbólico para que no firmes por nada y que la investigación se cierre”, lamentó. “Parece que por tener suerte, no tener lesiones graves y no morir en el intento, Cutcsa no se va a hacer cargo de mi situación. Es una indignación muy grande por parte de todos los pasajeros porque sufrimos daños, tenemos secuelas en la parte mental y hay que seguir el día a día.
Todo cuesta plata, se quejó el pasajero. Muniz narró que tiene que pagar cuentas y que, si quisiera ir a un psicólogo para tratar el trauma, no le saldría barato.
El ómnibus que traspasó la rambla y quedó sobre la arena era de la línea 121 de la empresa Cutcsa. Es una opción que a Sandro no le gustaba tomar para ir al trabajo. El recorrido es demasiado largo y el viaje se le hace lento. Pero ese sábado fue particular: las otras líneas demoraban en llegar y se encontró a una compañera en la parada.
Así lo narró al semanario uruguayo Búsqueda, que narró las historias de otros pasajeros que se subieron a ese 121 ese día fatal.
Daniela era su compañera de trabajo y, desde el inicio, ambos notaron que un comportamiento extraño en el chofer. Para empezar, por el lugar en el que frenó para que subieran: estaba bastante lejos de la vereda. Luego, comenzó a cruzar semáforos en rojo, a saltearse paradas. A frenar. A acelerar.
Eran cerca de las siete de la mañana de ese sábado y había poco tránsito en Montevideo. Daniela en un momento pensó en tomarse un taxi, pero finalmente decidieron seguir en el colectivo. “Ya veníamos advirtiendo que algo le pasaba, que estaba quemado, estaba locazo, pero nunca imaginamos que iba a hacer esto”, contó la mujer.

¿Qué es “esto”? Cruzar el cantero central de una calle de Montevideo, acomodar el coche contraflecha y salir a toda velocidad hacia la rambla. “El tipo apretó el acelerador, pasó el cantero. Y después siempre me quedó la pregunta: ‘¿si estaba dormido, por qué no se dio contra un árbol’?”, señaló.
Fueron ocho cuadras frenéticas contra mano.
Además de Sandro y Daniela, había 13 pasajeros más. Y todos gritaban: “¡Pará, hijo de puta, nos vas a matar, pará!”. “¡¿Qué hacés?!”. Algunos se arrimaban a la puerta, tocaban el timbre para pedir que se querían bajar. Gritaban. Intentaban hablar con el chofer. Le pedían que frene.
Daniela se puso sobre el borde del asiento, casi en cuclillas, y escondió la cabeza en sus brazos. Sandro se agarró con fuerza de los asientos de adelante.
El ómnibus pasó a más de 100 kilómetros por hora por la calle, cruzó otro cantero, atravesó un muro y pegó un salto sobre las dunas de la arena hasta que se detuvo en la orilla del mar.

Sandro ahora necesita volver a trabajar porque vive de un seguro de paro que no supera los USD 350 Y no puede creer que el chofer esté en su casa, según relató a Búsqueda.
“Estoy quemado con la Justicia, que dice que se durmió el hombre. Ahora no vamos a arreglar nada. Ya lo que pasó, pasó. Capaz que tuvo un mal día, pero hubiera dicho: ‘bájense, que me voy a matar’. Y sí, matate sol. Yo qué tengo que ver si estás loco. No tengo rencor, no gano nada, pero espero que la Justicia se haga cargo. Fue un atentado. No quiso matar a todos. Una locura”, comentó.
corresponsal: Desde Montevideo
INTERNACIONAL
Justice Department investigating University of California over alleged DEI-based hiring

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Justice Department has announced it is investigating the University of California (UC) for alleged Title VII discrimination violations in its hiring practices.
The agency announced Thursday that its Civil Rights Division is looking into the university’s individual campuses regarding potential race- and sex-based discrimination in employment practices.
The university’s «UC 2030 Capacity Plan» directs its campuses to hire «diverse» faculty members to meet race- and sex-based employment quotas, the Justice Department said.
The Justice Department has launched a Title VII investigation into the University of California over alleged race- and sex-based discrimination in faculty hiring. (AP Photo/Ben Margot, File)
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, LAW JOURNAL SUED FOR ALLEGEDLY DISCRIMINATING AGAINST STRAIGHT WHITE MALES
«These initiatives openly measure new hires by their race and sex, which potentially runs afoul of federal law,» the Justice Department said in a press release.
«The Civil Rights Division’s Employment Litigation Section will investigate whether the University of California is engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination based on race, sex, and other protected characteristics, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.»
Title VII prohibits an employer from discriminating against an individual on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant attorney general of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, said.
«Public employers are bound by federal laws that prohibit racial and other employment discrimination,» Dhillon said. «Institutional directives that use race- and sex-based hiring practices expose employers to legal risk under federal law.»
The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division wrote to the university on Thursday, informing it of the investigation.
«Our investigation is based on information suggesting that the University of California may be engaged in certain employment practices that discriminate against employees, job applicants, and training program participants based on race and sex in violation of Title VII,» the letter reads.
«Specifically, we have reason to believe the University of California’s ‘UC 2030 Capacity Plan’ precipitated unlawful action by the University of California and some or all its constituent campuses.»

In March, UC dropped diversity statements from its hiring practices amid President Donald Trump’s threats that schools could lose federal funding. (iStock)
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TARGETS IVY LEAGUE SCHOOL, LAW JOURNAL FOR RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
UC said it will work in good faith with the Justice Department as it conducts its investigation.
«The University of California is committed to fair and lawful processes in all of our programs and activities, consistent with federal and state anti-discrimination laws,» a UC statement provided to Fox News Digital reads. «The University also aims to foster a campus environment where everyone is welcomed and supported.»
The university’s UC 2030 Capacity Plan lays out a goal of becoming a national model as a Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI) and Minority-Serving Institution (MSI) system. The plan outlines a pipeline strategy to diversify faculty and researchers through expanded graduate enrollment and outreach to institutions that serve underrepresented students. The DOJ, however, claims these initiatives may violate Title VII by functioning as de facto employment quotas.
In March, UC dropped diversity statements from its hiring practices amid President Donald Trump’s threats that schools could lose federal funding.
The university’s provost, Katherine S. Newman, sent out a letter to the system’s leaders informing them that diversity statements are no longer required for new applicants. Newman wrote that while some programs and departments have required them, the university has never had a policy of diversity statements and believes it could harm applicant evaluation.

University of California, Berkeley entrance sign on the corner of Oxford Street and Center Street. (iStock)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
«The requirement to submit a diversity statement may lead applicants to focus on an aspect of their candidacy that is outside their expertise or prior experience,» the letter obtained by Fox News Digital reads.
She added that employees and applicants can still reference accomplishments related to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) on their own, but requiring stand-alone diversity statements is no longer permitted.
Fox News’ David Spunt and Lindsay Kornick contributed to this report.
INTERNACIONAL
Iranian foreign minister reiterates ‘serious damage’ to nuclear facilities, despite ayatollah’s comments

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi admitted in an interview on state TV that the U.S.’s strikes caused serious damage to Tehran’s nuclear facilities, despite Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s insistence that there was minimal impact.
Araghchi said in the interview that «the level of damage is high, and it’s serious damage,» according to the Associated Press.
Post-strike assessments have shown that Iran’s nuclear sites suffered damage in both U.S. and Israeli attacks. All three countries — Iran, Israel and the U.S. — have reached similar conclusions about the extent of the damage, despite what a leaked intel report indicated.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi contradicts Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on the extent of damage caused by U.S. strikes on the country’s nuclear facilities. (Associated Press)
IRAN, ISRAEL AND US AGREE THAT ISLAMIC REPUBLIC NUCLEAR SITES WERE ‘BADLY DAMAGED’ DESPITE LEAKED INTEL REPORT
The only leader who seemingly does not agree with the assessments is Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who said that «the Americans failed to achieve anything significant in their attack on nuclear facilities,» according to reports.
Khamenei appears to be more focused on projecting strength than reflecting reality. He described Iran’s attack on Al-Udeid, the American airbase in Qatar, as a «heavy slap to the U.S.’s face.» While President Donald Trump dismissed it as a «very weak response» and thanked Iran for giving the U.S. «early notice.»
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi said in a statement on Tuesday that the agency had «seen extensive damage at several nuclear sites in Iran, including its uranium conversion and enrichment facilities.»

This satellite picture by Planet Labs PBC shows Iran’s underground nuclear enrichment site at Fordo following U.S. airstrikes targeting the facility, on Sunday, June 22, 2025. (Planet Labs PBC via AP)
IRAN TRYING TO ‘SAVE FACE’ FOLLOWING US STRIKE ON NUCLEAR SITES, EXPERT SAYS
In addition to discussing the damage done to Iran’s nuclear sites, Araghchi also addressed the possibility of resuming talks with the U.S. He said that the American strikes «made it more complicated and more difficult» for Iran to come to the table, but did not rule out the possibility that negotiations could resume.
Nuclear talks with the U.S. might not be entirely off the table for Iran after last week’s strikes—even if Tehran is not interested in reentering negotiations right away.
The possibility of negotiations was already in question prior to Operation Midnight Hammer, as Tehran viewed the U.S. as being «complicit» in Israel’s Operation Rising Lion, according to Reuters, citing Iranian U.N. Ambassador Ali Bahreini.

US Vice President JD Vance, from left, US President Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, US secretary of state, and Pete Hegseth, US secretary of defense, during an address to the nation in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Saturday, June 21, 2025. (Carlos Barria/Reuters/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
EX-SECRETARY OF STATE CONDOLEEZZA RICE CALLS US STRIKES ON IRAN A ‘SHOT IN THE ARM’ FOR AMERICAN CREDIBILITY
Trump on Wednesday expressed optimism in the U.S.’s ability to resume nuclear talks with Iran.
«We’re going to talk to them next week, with Iran. We may sign an agreement, I don’t know. To me, I don’t think it’s that necessary. I mean, they had a war. They fought. Now they’re going back to their world. I don’t care if I have an agreement or not. The only thing we would be asking for is what we’re asking for before about, we want no nuclear [program]. But we destroyed the nuclear,» Trump said.
Despite Trump’s statement, there is still no clear indication that the countries have plans to meet in the near future.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
INTERNACIONAL
Terapia psicodélica aprobada en Nueva Zelanda. Él es el único médico que puede realizarla

Legalización
-
INTERNACIONAL3 días ago
La guerra en Oriente Medio: el Pentágono contradice a Donald Trump y asegura que el bombardeo a Irán solo retrasó su plan nuclear un par de meses
-
POLITICA3 días ago
Con un desempate de Magario, el Senado bonaerense aprobó la reelección indefinida de los legisladores provinciales
-
POLITICA3 días ago
Renunció la jueza Julieta Makintach en la antesala de un juicio político en su contra