INTERNACIONAL
Migrant lawyers claim Trump is deporting without ‘due process,’ but what does that mean?
Lawyers for Venezuelan men facing deportation told the Supreme Court on Monday that the Trump administration is defying its order by failing to give proper notice, violating their due process rights under the Constitution.
The Supreme Court issued a ruling in a separate case on April 7, allowing the Trump administration to continue its deportations under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act (AEA), proving a significant victory for President Donald Trump’s immigration agenda. The justices noted that the deportations could continue so long as the AEA detainees received proper notice.
«More specifically, in this context, AEA detainees must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act,» the opinion reads. «The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs.»
Due process is a constitutional principle that ensures fairness in legal and administrative proceedings, which includes giving proper notice and an opportunity to be heard in a timely manner by an impartial tribunal. The Supreme Court pointed to Reno v. Flores, a 1993 Supreme Court case, in writing, ‘»It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law’ in the context of removal proceedings.»
GORSUCH, ROBERTS SIDE WITH LEFT-LEANING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN IMMIGRATION RULING
Attorneys representing a group of Venezuelan men fighting deportation and who are currently being held in Texas alleged to the Supreme Court on Monday that the Trump administration was not providing proper notice in contradiction to the high court’s order instructing them to do so. (Getty Images)
«So, the detainees are entitled to notice and opportunity to be heard ‘appropriate to the nature of the case,’» the Court wrote, citing another Supreme Court precedent.
Former Palm Beach County, Florida, state attorney Dave Aronberg told Fox News Digital the high court has purposefully avoided «precise language» when issuing such opinions, leaving the lower courts to concretely delineate what proper due process looks like in these cases.
«Chief Justice [John] Roberts is trying to get unanimity within the Supreme Court,» Aronberg said. «He wants everyone on the same page. And he also wants to avoid a constitutional crisis with the executive branch. So with all these competing interests in mind, he’s trying to be more conciliatory than confrontational with the White House. But that can only go so far.»
Aronberg said that «we may see stronger language going forward from the high court» as the legal challenges proceed.
TWO FEDERAL JUDGES MAY HOLD TRUMP IN CONTEMPT AS HE DEFIES COURTS IN IMMIGRATION CRACKDOWN
In its Monday filing, plaintiff attorneys argued the notice given to the detainees was «inadequate» in light of the high court’s order.
The attorneys wrote that the notice provided was in English, «even though putative class members largely speak only Spanish,» and that it «did not inform» the individuals about how to contest their designation and removal under the AEA, or provide a timeline on how to do so.
The Supreme Court issued a ruling in a separate case on April 7, allowing the Trump administration to continue its deportations under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act. (Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images)
They argued the notice provided «comes nowhere near satisfying the Court’s directive» issued on April 7.
«Whatever due process may require in this context, it does not allow removing a person to a possible life sentence without trial, in a prison known for torture and other abuse, a mere 24 hours after providing an English-only notice form (not provided to any attorney) that gives no information about the person’s right to seek judicial review, much less the process or timeline for doing so,» the filing reads.
DETAINED MIGRANTS GIVEN AS FEW AS 12 HOURS TO CONTEST DEPORTATION UNDER ALIEN ENEMIES ACT, ICE DOCUMENT SAYS
«The government cannot plausibly claim that 12 hours is sufficient notice, which could be the reason they tried to keep it from the public and other courts addressing the notice issue, including the U.S. Supreme Court,» ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt, lead counsel in the case, told Fox News Digital in a statement.
Lora Ries, Director of the Border Security and Immigration Center at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital that she expects these deportation cases to «bounce up and down the court system» as litigants work within the confines the Supreme Court specified in its April 7 opinion.
«For now, the Supreme Court is relying on, if there’s going to be a habeas suit, it’s going to be in the U.S. District Court and then that judge is going to have to rule,» Ries explained. «And I’m sure there will be appeals and some or all of it may end up back at the Supreme Court.»
Lora Ries, Director of the Border Security and Immigration Center at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital that she expects these deportation cases to «bounce up and down the court system» as litigants work within the confines the Supreme Court specified in its April 7 opinion. (John Moore/Getty Images)
Aronberg noted that due process procedures may vary across the district courts as they juggle the various lawsuits. However, both he and Ries said the issue will likely end up in the high court’s hands once again.
«It is possible that some courts require notice to be in writing and in the native language of the deportee, whereas others could possibly accept less stringent notice requirements,» Aronberg said. «Ultimately, it will lead back to the Supreme Court to dictate what is required.»
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Ries also said that proceedings will differ in non-AEA cases, saying individuals sought to be removed in those contexts would undergo different types of removals.
«Immigration proceedings are civil proceedings. So you are not innocent until proven guilty,» Ries said. «It doesn’t apply here. You don’t have a right to a public defender. You can have a deportation immigration attorney, but you, the taxpayer, is not paying for it like a public defender.»
Fox News’ Shannon Bream, Bill Mears and Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report.
Law,Politics,Donald Trump,Immigration,Constitution
Marcha silenciosa
La islamofobia en Francia
La mezquita Khadidja, donde murió la víctima. Foto: ReutersLas declaraciones de Macron
Una comunidad en alerta
El hermano de Aboubakar Cisse. Foto: EFESer musulmán
La media luna de la mezquita Khadidja. Foto: Reuters
Jean-Luc Melenchon. Foto: Reuters
A lawsuit filed in the Southern District of New York last month claims the leaders of several radical anti-Israel groups involved in 18 months of disruptive, violent and antisemitic protests on campuses and in the streets of New York City are «accountable for aiding and abetting Hamas’ continuing acts of international terrorism.»
In purported violation of the Antiterrorism Act and the Alien Tort Statue, the defendants are said to have «acted as Hamas’ foot soldiers in New York City,» and may have had foreknowledge of the designated foreign terror organization’s devastating Oct. 7 attacks.
Defendants in the case are Within Our Lifetime and its founder Nerdeen Kiswani, Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and its representative Maryam Alwan, Columbia-Barnard Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and its representative Cameron Jones, and Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD) and its representative Mahmoud Khalil, who is currently in custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
The lawsuit asserts that the associational defendants have «distribute[d] Hamas-created and affiliated propaganda, incite[d] fear and violence, and attack[ed] critical academic, economic, and infrastructure centers in New York City,» as well as having «repeatedly terrorized and assaulted Jews across New York City and on Columbia University’s campus, physically assaulted Columbia University employees, and illegally seized and damaged public and private property.»
DUFFY SLAMS MTA OVER ‘FACT CHECK’ ON ANTI-ISRAEL MOB’S GRAND CENTRAL TAKEOVER
Nerdeen Kiswani, co-founder and leader of Within Our Lifetime, speaks at a demonstration near Columbia University on Feb. 2, 2024, in New York City. (Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images)
The details of the allegations are thorough. To demonstrate how the defendants «resoundingly and knowingly answered Hamas’ call to action» on and after Oct. 7, the lawsuit cites how the defendants knowingly «obtain[ed] and disseminat[ed]» a Hamas propaganda document, which contained directions created by the Hamas Media Office for spinning the narrative of their deadly attacks. By «painstakingly follow[ing]» the document, the lawsuit alleges defendants «directly responded to, and followed orders from, Hamas.»
The lawsuit also supplies several indicators that defendants may have had foreknowledge of the heinous Oct. 7 attack, to include «a highly suggestive social media post published moments before the October 7 attack began» in which Columbia SJP posted on Instagram «We are back!!» after a months-long hiatus.
On Oct. 7, Kiswani utilized marketing materials that «would not be released until the next day» in a National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) «Toolkit» demonstrating how SJP organizations across the country could support the Gazan «resistance.»
Emaciated Israeli hostages, from left, Ohad Ben Ami, Eli Sharabi and Or Levy are taken by terrorists to a stage before being handed over to the Red Cross in Deir al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip on Feb. 8, 2025. (AP/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Following Oct. 7, Within Our Lifetime promoted a «Day of Rage» in New York City while Columbia SJP and Columbia JVP promoted their own «Day of Resistance.» The mere announcements of these events forced closures of Jewish schools and institutions, and «even forced Columbia University – a non-Jewish institution – to close its campus as a safety precaution,» while Jewish students «were advised to lock their doors and remain inside for their own safety,» according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit names Khalil as the purported leader of Columbia SJP’s Day of Resistance.
COLUMBIA’S ANTI-ISRAEL PROTESTERS SAY TRUMP PULLING $400 MILLION IN GRANTS FROM UNIVERSITY IS A ‘SCARE TACTIC’
In November 2023, the suit describes how a «’Shut it Down for Palestine’ event descended into – as planned – anti-Jewish and vitriolic hatred and threats,» with speakers shouting «Death to Jews!» and «encourage[ing] Hamas and… comrades across Columbia’s campus to hunt down and assault pro-Israel students.»
The next day, Columbia University suspended Columbia SJP and Columbia JVP, at which time «Khalil and former members and/or organizers of Columbia SJP became leaders of CUAD.» As a result, CUAD «became the primary organizer of the violent and antisemitic protests that would foment terror, sow discord, and disrupt campus life at Columbia for over a year.»
Hamas terrorists kidnap a bloodied Israeli woman into the Gaza Strip. (Hamas-Telegram)
Khalil would later become the lead negotiator of the Columbia encampment, which the lawsuit notes was «well-supplied with identical tents, toiletries, food, and professional signage.» Based on a statement from Shlomi Ziv, a plaintiff in the lawsuit who was held captive by Hamas for 246 days following his kidnapping at the Nova Music Festival, «Hamas and [American Muslims for Palestine (AMP)]/NSJP provided financial, organizational, and other support… for the Encampment.»
Ziv alleges that his «Hamas captors bragged about having Hamas operatives on American university campuses,» and even «showed him Al-Jazeera stories and photographs of protests at Columbia University that were organized by Associational Defendants.»
APPARENT ANTI-ISRAEL ACTIVISTS SPLASH RED PAINT ON HOMES OF JEWISH OFFICIALS AT BROOKLYN MUSEUM
Anti-Israel demonstrators attend a protest at Columbia University in New York City, just days after the Hamas slaughter in southern Israel, Oct. 12, 2023. (Julia Bonavita/Fox News Digital)
Given the «legal chasm between independent political advocacy and coordinating with a foreign terrorist organization to seed pro-terror propaganda throughout America’s largest city,» the lawsuit alleges the defendants’ «actions violate the Antiterrorism Act and the law of nations.»
According to the Jerusalem Post, the National Jewish Advocacy Center, Greenberg Traurig LLP, the Schoen Law Firm, and the Holtzman Vogel Law Firm filed the suit on behalf of plaintiffs who include Ziv, several Columbia University students who have served with the Israel Defense Forces, and a number of American and Israeli citizens whose family members, most of whom are believed dead, remain in Hamas captivity.
People protest the banning of Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace at Columbia University on Nov. 20, 2023 in New York City. (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)
The lawsuit especially states that Khalil, «on information and belief, directly coordinates with Hamas, AMP/NSJP and/or other agents and affiliates of Hamas and related terrorist organizations.» The filers state that his detention by ICE in March may have been «based on many of his actions described in this Complaint.»
Khalil’s involvement in the Columbia protests was cited as a rationale for his removal during his April 11 hearing, when Judge Jamee Comans ruled that Khalil may be deported. Khalil also withheld past employment with the Syrian office in the Beirut British Embassy and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) as well as his membership in the CUAD when applying for a green card.
This withholding of information, according to federal officials, made Khalil «inadmissible at the time of his adjustment.»
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Disruptive events in New York City show no signs of abating. In March, students stormed a classroom at Columbia University and took over a building in affiliated Barnard College, where they assaulted an employee. A Within Our Lifetime protest on April 7 «took over» the main concourse of Grand Central Station.
Fox News Digital reached out to CUAD, Columbia SJP, Within Our Lifetime, and Columbia-Barnard JVP for comment about the allegations contained within the lawsuit, but received no response.
INTERNACIONAL
Liberaron a cuatro ex legisladores pro democracia de Hong Kong tras más de cuatro años de cárcel
Cuatro ex legisladores de la oposición de Hong Kong fueron liberados este martes tras cumplir más de cuatro años de prisión, en el que ha sido el caso más amplio bajo la ley de seguridad nacional impuesta por el régimen de China 2020.
Claudia Mo, Jeremy Tam, Kwok Ka-ki y Gary Fan fueron excarcelados justo antes del amanecer, convirtiéndose en los primeros en recuperar su libertad entre los 47 líderes pro democracia procesados por presunta subversión.
Los cuatro ex parlamentarios habían sido arrestados y acusados en 2021, tras participar en la organización de unas elecciones primarias no oficiales, cuyo objetivo era ganar una mayoría legislativa opositora.
El régimen chino sostuvo que el plan de vetar de forma sistemática el presupuesto gubernamental constituía una conspiración para subvertir el poder del Estado, una acusación enmarcada dentro de la legislación aprobada por el gobierno central tras las masivas protestas de 2019.
Según los registros judiciales, los ex legisladores se declararon culpables y fueron sentenciados a cuatro años y dos meses de prisión, una pena reducida debido a sus declaraciones de culpabilidad y su “pasado servicio público” y “desconocimiento de la ley”, según indicó el tribunal.
La salida de prisión se realizó de forma discreta, con los vehículos de traslado cubiertos con cortinas. Desde su domicilio, el esposo de Claudia Mo, el periodista Philip Bowring, declaró: “Ella está bien y de buen ánimo… Estamos felices de estar juntos otra vez”, dijo a la prensa local.
En el interior de la vivienda podía verse un cartel que decía “Welcome home mum”. Bowring añadió que planean visitar Inglaterra próximamente para ver a sus nietos.
Por su parte, Gary Fan indicó a medios locales que se dirigía a reencontrarse con su familia y agradeció las muestras de apoyo: “Gracias a todos los hongkoneses por su preocupación”, dijo.
Los cuatro liberados recibieron las penas más leves entre los 47 acusados, en parte debido a su colaboración con la justicia. La condena más severa en el caso fue impuesta al académico Benny Tai, considerado por la fiscalía como el “cerebro” del supuesto complot, quien recibió una pena de 10 años de cárcel.
El proceso judicial y las sentencias impuestas han generado fuertes críticas internacionales. Gobiernos occidentales y organizaciones defensoras de los derechos humanos denunciaron una regresión en las libertades civiles en Hong Kong. El caso es visto como un símbolo de la represión política bajo la ley de seguridad nacional impuesta por Beijing, que penaliza actos de secesión, subversión, terrorismo y colusión con fuerzas extranjeras.
Claudia Mo, una de las figuras más reconocidas del movimiento pro democracia, trabajó anteriormente como periodista de AFP y relató que su experiencia cubriendo la masacre de Tiananmén en 1989 influyó decisivamente en su activismo.
En 2006, cofundó el partido Civic Party y fue elegida legisladora en 2012. Más adelante se separó del partido para centrarse en una plataforma que destacaba la identidad diferenciada de Hong Kong respecto a China continental.
Jeremy Tam y Kwok Ka-ki también fueron miembros del Civic Party. Tam fue piloto de aerolínea antes de entrar a la política, mientras que Kwok ejercía como médico. Gary Fan, por su parte, fundó el partido Neo Democrats, orientado a promover reformas electorales y a frenar la influencia política y cultural del gobierno central sobre Hong Kong.
Desde la implementación de la ley de seguridad nacional, el régimen de Hong Kong ha arrestado a 322 personas y ha condenado a 163, según cifras oficiales actualizadas a inicios de este mes.
El año pasado, el gobierno local promulgó una segunda ley de seguridad nacional, alegando que es necesaria para restaurar el orden tras las protestas de 2019.
El tribunal tiene previsto escuchar en julio las apelaciones presentadas por 14 de los condenados. Mientras tanto, las excarcelaciones de este martes marcan un nuevo capítulo en el proceso judicial más emblemático desde la reconfiguración del sistema político de Hong Kong bajo la influencia directa de Beijing.
(Con información de AFP)
Asia / Pacific,Crime,HONG KONG
El DT verdugo de Boca en la final de la Libertadores ’23 es candidato para agarrar Vasco da Gama
Los candidatos porteños participarán hoy de un debate que puede ser tan decisivo como la elección
Rodríguez Larreta embistió contra el gobierno porteño: “Están convirtiendo a Buenos Aires en el conurbano”
Islamofobia en Francia: matan de 40 puñaladas a un joven en una mezquita
Santa Cruz: Repudio y alarma por el ataque al Concejo Deliberante de un municipio
Wanda Nara confirmó por qué la China Suárez no puede vincularse con sus hijas: “La Justicia decidió que así sea”
Javier Milei recordó que le pidió perdón al papa Francisco: “Me dijo son errores de juventud”
El llanto de Javier Milei y una pelea que desata pasiones
Javier Milei llegó a Roma para el funeral del papa Francisco
El dato llamativo del homenaje al Papa Francisco en la marcha de la CGT del 30 de abril
Imparable: la petrolera Vista incrementó casi 50% su producción gracias a Vaca Muerta
La sorprendente imagen de David Luiz y su pelo que ya se ha hecho viral
Jujuy: Vecinos de La Isla denuncian abandono y manipulación política
Vecinos del asentamiento La Isla, ubicado en el barrio San Martín de Jujuy, volvieron a alzar la voz tras casi...
Lamine Yamal ya tiene su Óscar del deporte
Lamine Yamal ha sido premiado este lunes por la Academia Laureus World Sports como mejor deportista revelación de la temporada....
Martín Ayerbe: “La política argentina es vanidad absoluta”
Durante la entrevista, Martín Ayerbe fue contundente al describir el panorama político y la situación de su espacio: “Hace dos...
