Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Muslims in India voice concerns that new citizenship law could further marginalize them

Published

on


  • India has recently announced the implementation of a citizenship law excluding Muslims.
  • The Citizenship Amendment Act provides expedited naturalization for migrants from South Asian faiths other than Islam, excluding Muslims from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.
  • The law, approved in 2019, sparked nationwide protests due to concerns about its discriminatory nature.

India has implemented a citizenship law that excludes Muslims, a minority community whose concerns have heightened under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist government.

The rules for the law were announced Monday. It establishes a religious test for migrants from every major South Asian faith other than Islam. Critics argue that the law is further evidence that Modi’s government is trying to reshape the country into a Hindu state and marginalize Muslims.

WHAT IS THE CITIZENSHIP LAW?

The Citizenship Amendment Act provides a fast track to naturalization for Hindus, Parsis, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains and Christians who fled to Hindu-majority India from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan before Dec. 31, 2014. The law excludes Muslims, who are a majority in all three nations.

INDIA’S GOVERNMENT TO ENACT CONTROVERSIAL CITIZENSHIP LAW EXCLUDING MUSLIMS AHEAD OF ELECTION

It also amends the old law, which prevents illegal migrants from becoming Indian citizens, and marks the first time that India — an officially secular state with a religiously diverse population — has set religious criteria for citizenship.

India protest

All Assam Students Union members take out a torch procession to protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act on March 12, 2024, in Guwahati, India. India has implemented a citizenship law that excludes Muslims, a minority community whose concerns have heightened under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist government. (AP Photo/Anupam Nath)

The Indian government has said those eligible can apply for Indian citizenship through an online portal.

The implementation of the law has been one of the key campaign promises of Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party before a general election scheduled to be held by May.

Advertisement

Modi’s government has dismissed arguments that the law is discriminatory. It defends the law as a humanitarian gesture to extend citizenship to religious minorities fleeing persecution and says it would not be used against Indian citizens.

WHAT MAKES THE LAW SO CONTROVERSIAL?

The law was approved by Parliament in 2019, but Modi’s government held off its implementation after deadly protests in which scores were killed.

The nationwide protests drew people of all faiths who said the law undermines India’s foundation as a secular nation. Muslims were particularly worried that the government could use the law, combined with a proposed citizenship registry, to marginalize them.

The National Register of Citizens is part of the Modi government’s effort to identify and weed out people it claims came to India illegally. The register has only been implemented in the northeastern state of Assam, but Modi’s party has promised to roll out a citizenship verification program nationwide.

Critics and Muslim groups say the citizenship law will protect non-Muslims who are excluded from the register, while Muslims could face deportation or internment.

On Monday, human rights watchdog Amnesty India said the law «legitimizes discrimination based on religion.»

The United States also expressed its concern and said it will closely monitor how India implements the law. «Respect for religious freedom and equal treatment under the law for all communities are fundamental democratic principles,» State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller told reporters at a daily briefing Thursday.

Advertisement

WHY ARE INDIA’S MUSLIMS WORRIED?

Opponents of the law — including Muslims, opposition parties and rights groups — say it is exclusionary and violates the secular principles enshrined in the constitution. They say faith cannot be made a condition of citizenship.

Some also argue that if the law is aimed at protecting persecuted minorities, then it should have included Muslim religious minorities who have faced persecution in their own countries, including Ahmadis in Pakistan and Rohingyas in Myanmar.

To critics, Modi is pushing a Hindu nationalist agenda that threatens to erode the country’s secular foundation, shrink space for religious minorities, particularly Muslims, and move the country closer to a Hindu nation.

INDIA’S RELIGIOUS DIVIDE CONTINUES TO WIDEN BETWEEN MUSLIM, HINDU COMMUNITY

India has a large minority group of 200 million Muslims in its population of more than 1.4 billion. They live in almost every part of India and have been targeted in numerous attacks since Modi assumed power in 2014.

Scores of Muslims have been lynched by Hindu mobs over allegations of eating beef or smuggling cows, an animal considered holy to Hindus. Muslim businesses have been boycotted, their localities have been bulldozed and places of worship set on fire. Some open calls have been made for their genocide.

Critics say Modi’s conspicuous silence over anti-Muslim violence has emboldened some of his most extreme supporters and enabled more hate speech against Muslims.

Advertisement

Modi has also increasingly mixed religion with politics in a formula that has resonated deeply with India’s majority Hindu population. In January, he opened a Hindu temple at the site of a demolished mosque in northern Ayodhya city, fulfilling his party’s long-held Hindu nationalist pledge.

Source link

INTERNACIONAL

Choque de poder en Ecuador: una jueza restituye en su cargo a la vicepresidenta y echa abajo una suspensión de cinco meses

Published

on


Una jueza restituyó este lunes en su cargo a la vicepresidenta de Ecuador, Verónica Abad, y dejó sin efecto la suspensión de cinco meses que le impuso el ministerio de Trabajo por abandono injustificado de sus labores.

La decisión se dio tras una petición de amparo de Abad a la justicia, en una audiencia en la que la jueza Nubia Vera concedió el recurso y argumentó que la sanción fue “inconstitucional” y violó sus derechos.

A inicios de noviembre, el ministerio de Trabajo suspendió a Abad por 150 días sin remuneración por haber cometido una “falta grave”, al no trasladarse en el plazo indicado hacia la embajada de Turquía tras un cambio de legación diplomática desde Israel, donde cumplía la función de embajadora. Abad llegó ocho días después de la fecha fijada.

La vicepresidenta mantiene diferencias públicas con el presidente Daniel Noboa, a quien denunció ante un tribunal por supuesta violencia política de género en su contra, entre otras razones, por haberla enviado a Israel en un acto que ella ha calificado como “exilio forzoso”.

La sentencia que la restituye en su cargo de vicepresidenta señaló que “en virtud de que se ha observado la vulneración de los derechos constitucionales a la tutela judicial efectiva, la seguridad jurídica, el debido proceso, las garantías básicas y la aplicación de norma y derechos de las partes” dispone dejar sin efecto la resolución del ministerio de Trabajo y dar “cumplimiento inmediato”.

Abad ha sostenido que el objetivo del gobierno ha sido presionarla para que renuncie y evitar la sucesión presidencial.

Advertisement

Esta figura es clave para Noboa, quien deberá solicitar en enero una licencia para la campaña electoral con miras a los comicios presidenciales de febrero de 2025 donde aspira a la reelección. Según la Constitución, la sucesión presidencial le corresponde a quien ocupe la Vicepresidencia.

Daniel Noboa y Verónica Abad. Foto AFP

Al concluir la audiencia, la jueza Vera denunció ante los medios haber sido “coaccionada, amenazada y amedrentada”. Aseguró que Mario Godoy, presidente del Consejo de la Judicatura —organismo administrativo y sancionatorio de la función judicial—, y otros funcionarios la amenazaron “que me van a destituir si es que yo fallo contario”.

Denuncia presiones

«Tengo la flash memory (dispositivo de almacenamiento) donde me ponían cómo tengo que fallar”, dijo y afirmó que se le estarían interponiendo sumarios administrativos en su contra.

El organismo judicial reaccionó en un comunicado y calificó las declaraciones de la jueza Vera como “malintencionadas” y con “evidente tinte político”. Agregó que las acusaciones “carecen de fundamento” y “representan un ataque directo contra los valores esenciales de un Estado de derecho”.

La ministra del Trabajo, Ivonne Núñez, adelantó que apelará la sentencia, que le impone emitir una disculpa pública en un mensaje difundido a nivel nacional, así como el pago de todos los ingresos económicos que Abad dejó de recibir desde la suspensión.

Por su parte, Abad comentó tras conocer el fallo que se dirigía hacia el despacho vicepresidencial y que “el pueblo ecuatoriano es un pueblo de paz, de orden y justicia y así va a salir la verdad”.

Advertisement

El constitucionalista Ismael Quintana mencionó a The Associated Press que la resolución de la jueza es de cumplimiento “inmediato”, pese a que será apelada por el ministerio, por lo que Abad debe reintegrarse a sus funciones de vicepresidenta. Agregó que el presidente Noboa debe disponer a la vicepresidenta que designó como encargada, Sariha Moya, retornar a las funciones que ejercía previo a su nombramiento temporal.

Según el jurista, “el ministerio de Trabajo no tiene competencia para sancionar funcionarios electos por voto popular”, para quienes, aseguró, la Constitución establece procedimientos y órganos competentes que establezcan sus responsabilidades como son el juicio político y la revocatoria de mandato ante la Asamblea Nacional.

Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias

Copyright © 2024 - NDM Noticias del Momento - #Noticias #Chimentos #Politica #Fútbol #Economia #Sociedad