Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

The Speaker’s Lobby: ‘Whose throat do I get to choke?’

Published

on


It was a split screen Tuesday morning on Capitol Hill.

One eye on the markets. The other eye on the Senate testimony of U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

Advertisement

«Do you think your remarks will alter the markets in any way?» yours truly asked Greer as he walked to the hearing room in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.

«I’m just going to respond to the senators. Be candid as I can be,» replied Greer.

TRUMP TRADE REP TAKES BIPARTISAN FIRE OVER TARIFFS AS DEM LAUNCHES BID TO HALT THEM

Advertisement

The public has heard a lot about tariffs from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

They’ve heard a lot about tariffs from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

They’ve heard even more about tariffs from White House advisor Peter Navarro.

Advertisement

But until Tuesday morning, there was little said about tariffs from the man in charge of the administration’s trade policy: Jamieson Greer.

All eyes were on two things Tuesday morning — the stock market and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. (AP/Getty Images)

«The president’s strategy is already bearing fruit,» Greer testified. «Nearly 50 countries have approached me personally to discuss the president’s new policy and explore how to achieve reciprocity.»

Advertisement

Democrats were dubious about Greer’s suggestion. Yes, nations may be willing to negotiate. But carving out sophisticated trade agreements with nations just sanctioned by the U.S. takes time.

«You’re telling us you have nearly 50 countries coming to you, approaching you to enter into negotiation, and you think that you can do that overnight?» asked Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev. «You’re pretty superhuman here, if that’s the case.»

TRUMP TRADE CHIEF FACES HOUSE GRILLING ON TARIFFS

Advertisement

Greer tangled with Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H.

«Even if inflation hits Americans’ pocketbooks at 10% because of these tariffs, then the Trump administration is still going to go charging ahead?» asked Hassan.

«Senator, your hypotheticals are not consistent with the history we have seen with tariffs,» Greer replied.

Advertisement
Jamieson Greer

Greer got the third degree from members of Congress on both sides of the political aisle. (Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)

«My hypotheticals are based on the fact that a lot of Americans are looking at their 401(k)’s today and wondering how much of a lifestyle change they are going to have to have or whether they’re going to be able to retire when they plan to,» Hassan shot back. «This has been a haphazard, incompetent effort. And it’s showing.»

After rough showings, the markets actually shot up at the opening bell Tuesday before Greer spoke. It didn’t appear that anything Greer told senators resonated positively or negatively on Wall Street. But lawmakers were well attuned to the market fluctuations. 

Especially as they started to hear from constituents.

Advertisement

TRUMP SAYS HE’LL ‘TAKE A LOOK’ AT EXEMPTING SOME LARGER US COMPANIES HIT ESPECIALLY HARD BY TARIFFS

Outside the hearing room, Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., offered one of his signature Bayou homilies to characterize the unfolding trade war.

«God created the world. But everything else is made in China,» said Kennedy.

Advertisement

«But senator, isn’t the bigger issue here the question of the uncertainty in the markets and rattling around?» I asked Kennedy.

«Well, there’s always uncertainty,» answered Kennedy.

«But this is a different type of uncertainty, though, Senator,» I countered.

Advertisement

«Is it going to have to have an impact on your capital markets? Well, yes. Duh. And it’s not fun. It’s very, very painful. Whether this will have a happy ending or a sad ending depends in large part what President Trump does next,» said Kennedy.

Republican Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., acknowledged the fate of the market lies largely in the hands of President Trump and whatever his administration does next. (Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

And that’s the key to the entire enterprise. It doesn’t matter what Lutnick does. Or Bessent. Or Navarro. And not Greer. For better or worse, this is President Trump’s baby. Only he can move markets. And potentially trade deals. And that’s certainly what unfolded in recent days.

Democrats — and some Republicans — excoriated the president for unilaterally imposing the tariffs. Lawmakers asked the reasoning for imposing the tariffs. And they argued that the tariffs should have been an issue which came to Capitol Hill.

Advertisement

«Where was the consultation with Congress about this? Where is the homework? You know, Greek and Roman letters thrown on a plaque doesn’t mean a strategy that you’ve informed Congress on,» Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., the top Democrat on the Senate Commerce Committee, asked. «And part of the question is, where’s the homework done by the administration to not misconstrue the authority that was given?»

SCHUMER SAYS TRUMP ‘FEELING THE HEAT’ AFTER RECIPROCAL TARIFF PAUSE

Cantwell may not have received a sufficient answer from the Trump administration on the rationale. But Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., answered the other part of the question about why the President cut Congress out of the loop.

Advertisement

«Let’s not pretend that this is anything other than the president exercising the statutory authority Congress has given him for decades,» said Hawley. «Because Congress didn’t want to do tariffs, they didn’t want to do trade, it was too hot. They wanted the president to hold the hot potato. So now you’ve got a President who’s happy to do that.»

Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution declares that Congress has the «Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States.»

Josh Hawley

«Let’s not pretend that this is anything other than the president exercising the statutory authority Congress has given him for decades,» Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said of Trump’s imposition of tariffs. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative says the U.S. is a signatory to more than 14 total trade pacts. Congress has ratified several of those in recent years. That includes the USMCA. That’s a trade pact President Trump pushed – alongside former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in 2020 for the U.S., Mexico and Canada. That deal replaced NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, approved by Congress in 1993. Congress also greenlighted «CAFTA, the Central American Free Trade Agreement, in 2005.

Advertisement

So, Congress has engaged in trade somewhat in recent decades. But maybe not as much as it should have.

Greer appeared for a second time on Capitol Hill Wednesday, testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee.

TRUMP PUSHES BACK ON ‘REBEL’ REPUBLICANS OVER TARIFFS: ‘YOU DON’T NEGOTIATE LIKE I NEGOTIATE’

Advertisement

«Any deal that you do, are you going to bring that to Congress for a vote?» asked Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash.,

«We’ll do what the law requires. Some of it’s consultation. Some requires a vote. So we’ll follow the law,» replied Greer.

But DelBene pressed Greer on the president using emergency powers on the tariffs. She quoted from the statute.

Advertisement
Rep. Suzan DelBene

Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., pressed Greer on the Trump administration’s leveraging of executive powers. (Reuters)

«It states, ‘The President, in every possible instance, shall consult with Congress before exercising any powers,’» said DelBene. «That didn’t happen.»

Greer said he called Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., and the top Democrat on the panel, Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass.

«I argue that we did not have that consultation,» said DelBene, who sits on the trade subcommittee.

Advertisement

WHITE HOUSE WARNS AGAINST TARIFF RETALIATION, SAYS TRUMP ‘HAS SPINE OF STEEL AND HE WILL NOT BREAK’

But less than two hours later — with Greer still testifying — President Trump announced he was now pausing most tariffs for three months. But still imposing steep tariffs on China.

Rep. Steven Horsford, D-Nev., was apoplectic.

Advertisement

«He announced it on a tweet?» an incredulous Horsford asked of Greer. «WTF? Who’s in charge?»

Steven Horsford

Rep. Steven Horsford, D-Nev., appeared beyond furious with the rollout of Trump’s tariff plan. (Leigh Vogel/Getty Images for Congressional Black Caucus Foundation)

«The president of United States is in charge,» Greer said.

«And what do you know about those details?» countered Horsford. «It looks like your boss just pulled the rug out from under you.»

Advertisement

Horsford later asked if what the President executed was «market manipulation.» Greer said it wasn’t.

HOUSE DEMOCRAT SAYS HE’D VOTE TO PROTECT TRUMP’S TARIFF PLAN, WORRIES WHITE HOUSE WILL STAND DOWN

So, when the hearing adjourned, yours truly and Nikole Killion of CBS pursued Greer to get more clarity on the president’s new strategy.

Advertisement

«Can you explain why you were caught flat-footed about the change in the trade policy? Were you aware of any of this?» I asked Greer before he stepped into an anteroom.

We resumed the quest in the hall.

«Were you not told about this?» I asked.

Advertisement

«Did you know before your testimony?» added Killion.

«I’ll just refer you to my testimony,» said Greer.

«Your testimony did not reflect what it was implemented during the hearing,» I followed up.

Advertisement

«I’ll just refer you to my testimony,» Greer repeated.

«But that’s inconsistent with the decision of the president,» I said.

Pergram/Greer chase

I tried to get a few answers out of Greer after one of his hearings. He remained fairly mum on most of what he was asked. (FOX)

An aide to Greer then intervened.

Advertisement

«I think the ambassador was extremely clear in his testimony about what was going on, and the president could make the choice,» the aide interjected.

«Explain why you don’t think that this was market manipulation. You said it wasn’t,» I followed up.

HOUSE CONSERVATIVES READY TO OPPOSE SENATE GOP FRAMEWORK FOR TRUMP TAX CUT PACKAGE

Advertisement

«Were you aware that there would be a pause before you came here to Capitol Hill? Yes or no? Yes or No, sir?» Killion continued.

Greer then disappeared down a winding staircase in the Longworth House Office Building.

Let’s shift back to the Senate hearing on Tuesday with Greer.

Advertisement
Sen. Thom Tillis

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who faces a potential uphill battle for re-election next year, was more blunt in his questioning of Greer, asking, «Whose throat do I get to choke if this proves to be wrong?» (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., could face a competitive re-election bid next year. He asked a pointed question to Greer.

«Whose throat do I get to choke if this proves to be wrong?» Tillis asked.

«Well, Senator, you can certainly always talk to me,» replied Greer.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«So, if you own this decision, I’ll look to you to figure out if we’re going to be successful,» said Tillis. «If you don’t own the decision, I’m just trying to figure out who’s throat I get to choke if it’s wrong.»

Advertisement

Congress,Trade,Trump’s First 100 Days,Economy,Senate,House Of Representatives

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Schumer, Democrats try to save face, blame GOP for possible government shutdown

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Congressional Democrats are trying to get on the same page and display a unified front after threatening to derail the government funding process.

Advertisement

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., met behind closed doors Tuesday night, along with the top Democrats in the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, to plot a course forward in the forthcoming government funding fight.

SENATE WEATHERS DEM OPPOSITION, ADVANCES FIRST GOVERNMENT FUNDING BILL

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., turns to an aide during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Advertisement

The meeting came after Democrats in the upper chamber overwhelmingly supported the first government funding bill to hit the Senate floor, one that would fund military construction and Veterans Affairs. Ahead of the vote, Senate Democrats had signaled they may vote against the bill and further obstruct the appropriations process because of highly partisan legislation rammed through the upper chamber by Senate Republicans.

«We all want to pursue a bipartisan, bicameral appropriations process,» Schumer said. «That’s how it’s always been done, successfully, and we believe that, however, the Republicans are making it extremely difficult to do that.»

The meeting just off the Senate floor was meant to get congressional Democrats on board with a messaging plan over the next weeks and months ahead of the Sept. 30 deadline to fund the government.

Advertisement

CONGRESSIONAL REPUBLICANS FACE BRUISING BATTLE TO AVOID GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN

John Thune

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., is seen after the Senate luncheons in the U.S. Capitol on June 24, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

It was also likely designed to prevent a repeat of the Democratic debacle in March, when Schumer broke with Jeffries and threatened to shutter the government before ultimately caving and providing Republicans the votes necessary to advance yet another government funding extension, known as a continuing resolution.

Republicans are quick to point out that when Schumer led the upper chamber, none of the House GOP’s spending bills made it to the floor — in Congress, the spending process begins in the lower chamber.

Advertisement

Since taking over earlier this year, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has committed to returning to regular order, or passing each of the dozen spending bills to fund the government, and trying to get the appropriations process back to normal.

However, it’s a feat that hasn’t been successfully done in Washington since the late 1990s. 

«Frankly, I think a lot of us around here think [this] is long overdue,» Thune said.  

Advertisement

However, Democrats contend that their trust in Republicans is wearing thin after two major partisan bills, one being President Donald Trump’s «big, beautiful bill,» and the other the president’s $9 billion clawback package, were pushed through the chamber without any Democratic input.

‘BAIT AND SWITCH’: SCHUMER WARNS OF BITTER FUNDING FIGHT OVER GOP CUTS PLAN

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries

Representative Hakeem Jeffries, a Democrat from New York, speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 6, 2025. (Tierney L. Cross/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Thune argued that Senate Democrats were using the rescissions package to shut down the appropriations process and effectively shut down the government.

Advertisement

In the Senate, most bills that come to the floor require at least 60 votes to smash through the filibuster, meaning that most legislation requires bipartisan support to some extent.

Earlier this year, the House GOP produced a partisan government funding extension that was a tough pill for Senate Democrats to swallow, but they still ultimately opted to vote for it. This time around, they’re demanding more involvement in the process.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Jeffries said that congressional Democrats would play ball if the process was «bipartisan and bicameral in nature» and put the onus of a partial government shutdown at the feet of congressional Republicans.

«House Republicans are, in fact, marching us toward a possible government shutdown that will hurt the American people,» he said.

However, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., threw the responsibility on Democrats over whether the government would shutter or stay open come the end of September.

Advertisement

«They’re gaming out how they can shut the government down,» Johnson told Bloomberg Government. 

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Ucrania: el presidente Volodimir Zelenski enfrenta críticas y protestas por una nueva ley anticorrupción

Published

on


Activistas ucranianos convocaron más protestas este miércoles contra una ley que, según ellos, debilita los organismos anticorrupción del país, tras la primera gran manifestación contra el gobierno del país en más de tres años de guerra. La legislación también ha recibido críticas de funcionarios de la Unión Europea y grupos internacionales de derechos humanos.

El presidente, Volodimyi Zelenski, presionado porque la medida amenazaba con poner en peligro su apoyo público en un momento crítico de la guerra, citó a los jefes de las principales agencias anticorrupción y de seguridad de Ucrania el miércoles por la mañana en respuesta a la protesta contra su decisión de aprobar la nueva ley aprobada por el Parlamento.

Advertisement

“Todos escuchamos lo que dice la sociedad”, escribió Zelenski en Telegram después de la reunión. Sin embargo, insistió en que el nuevo marco legal era necesario para combatir más duramente la corrupción.

“Los casos penales no deberían prolongarse durante años sin veredictos, y aquellos que trabajan contra Ucrania no deben sentirse cómodos o inmunes al castigo”, dijo el líder ucraniano.

Dijo que todas las agencias gubernamentales acordaron trabajar de forma constructiva y responder a las expectativas públicas de equidad y eficacia. Se espera un plan de acción conjunto detallado dentro de dos semanas, destinado a abordar las debilidades institucionales, eliminar obstáculos legales y garantizar la justicia en todos los ámbitos, dijo.

Advertisement
Ucranianos protestan en la primera manifestación en tiempos de guerra contra una ley recién aprobada que limita la independencia de las instituciones anticorrupción. Foto Reuters

Miles de personas se reunieron en la capital y otras ciudades de Ucrania el martes por la noche para instar a Zelenski a vetar un controvertido proyecto de ley. Después de que Zelenski lo aprobara, los activistas convocaron en las redes sociales otra protesta en el centro de Kiev a las 8 de la tarde del miércoles.

La legislación endurece la supervisión gubernamental de dos agencias anticorrupción clave. Los críticos dicen que la medida podría debilitar significativamente la independencia de esas agencias y otorgar al círculo de Zelenski una mayor influencia sobre las investigaciones.

Advertencia de funcionarios de la UE

Advertisement

Combatir la corrupción arraigada es crucial para las aspiraciones de Ucrania de unirse a la UE y mantener el acceso a miles de millones de dólares en ayuda occidental en su lucha contra la invasión de tres años de Rusia.

“Limitar la independencia de la agencia anticorrupción de Ucrania obstaculiza el camino de Ucrania hacia la UE”, advirtió este miércoles el ministro de Asuntos Exteriores de Alemania, Johann Wadephul, en una publicación en X.

El comisario de Defensa de la UE, Andrius Kubilius, señaló también en X que: “En la guerra, la confianza entre la nación combatiente y su liderazgo es más importante que las armas modernas. Difícil de construir y mantener, pero fácil de perder con un error significativo del liderazgo”.

Advertisement
El presidente ucraniano, Volodimir Zelenski, convocó a los jefes de todas las agencias de investigación y de lucha contra la corrupción del país. Foto EFEEl presidente ucraniano, Volodimir Zelenski, convocó a los jefes de todas las agencias de investigación y de lucha contra la corrupción del país. Foto EFE

La rama ucraniana de Transparencia Internacional criticó la decisión del Parlamento, diciendo que socava una de las reformas más significativas desde lo que Ucrania llama su Revolución de la Dignidad en 2014, y daña la confianza con los socios internacionales. Acusó a las autoridades de “desmantelar” la arquitectura anticorrupción del país.

Zelenski ha sido el rostro internacional de la determinación de Ucrania ante la invasión total de Rusia, y sus problemas internos son una distracción no deseada del esfuerzo de guerra.

Zelenski dijo que la medida elimina la “influencia rusa” de la lucha contra la corrupción y garantiza el castigo para aquellos que sean encontrados culpables de ella, después de lo que él describió como retrasos de años en procedimientos penales que involucran enormes cantidades de dinero.

“Los casos que se han quedado parados deben ser investigados”, dijo Zelenski en una publicación de Telegram después de la medianoche del miércoles. “Durante años, funcionarios que han huido de Ucrania han estado viviendo casualmente en el extranjero por alguna razón, en países muy agradables y sin consecuencias legales, y esto no es normal”, dijo. No proporcionó ejemplos de lo que dijo era interferencia rusa.

Advertisement

Las autoridades rusas disfrutaron de las dificultades de Zelenski. La portavoz del Ministerio ruso de Exteriores, María Zajárova, se burló de las afirmaciones de Zelenski sobre la infiltración rusa en la agencia anticorrupción, señalando sarcásticamente que “también podrían sacar un par de osos de la esquina”.

Negociaciones en Estambul

Delegaciones de Rusia y Ucrania tenían previsto reunirse en Estambul este miércoles para su tercera ronda de conversaciones directas en dos meses, dijeron funcionarios del Kremlin y ucranianos. No se esperaba que la reunión lograra progresos en poner fin a la guerra y probablemente se centraría en los intercambios de prisioneros de guerra.

Advertisement

Los cambios legislativos otorgarían al fiscal general nueva autoridad sobre las investigaciones y casos manejados por la Oficina Nacional Anticorrupción de Ucrania (NABU) y la Oficina del Fiscal Especializado en Anticorrupción (SAPO).

El ambiente de ira y frustración entre los ucranianos cansados de la guerra prevaleció en la multitud el martes. Algunos manifestantes acusaron a los líderes de Ucrania de priorizar la lealtad y las conexiones personales sobre la lucha contra la corrupción.

“Aquellos que juraron proteger las leyes y la Constitución han elegido en su lugar proteger a su círculo íntimo, incluso a expensas de la democracia ucraniana”, dijo el veterano Oleh Symoroz, sentado en una silla de ruedas porque le amputaron ambas piernas después de ser herido en 2022.

Advertisement

Ucrania,Volodímir Zelenski,Rusia,Guerra Rusia-Ucrania

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump admin official to meet with Israel, Qatar amid push for Gaza ceasefire

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Special Envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to meet with Israeli and Qatari officials in Rome on Thursday as the U.S. pushes for a ceasefire deal in Gaza. 

Advertisement

Hamas and Israel are engaging in indirect negotiations to end the war that has raged on for nearly two years. However, Witkoff’s itinerary depends on the progress made in the talks. If the parties make enough progress in Rome, Witkoff will reportedly travel to Doha to finalize the deal, according to Axios. 

The outlet also reported that sources indicated the meeting in Rome could suggest that a deal is near — possibly just days away.

Earlier this month, Israel agreed to a U.S.-backed, 60-day ceasefire proposal that would lead to the end of the war. This deal includes a phased release of hostages, the withdrawal of Israeli troops from parts of Gaza and talks on ending the conflict, according to Reuters.

Advertisement

Special Envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to meet with Israeli and Qatari officials in Rome on Thursday to secure a deal to end the war in Gaza. (Dawoud Abo Alkas/Anadolu/Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

ISRAEL, HAMAS TALKS DRAG AS AID GROUP CHAIR TELLS UN TO STOP ACTING LIKE THE ‘MAFIA’

«My representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza. Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the war. The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring peace, will deliver this final proposal. I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this deal because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE,» President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on July 1.

Advertisement
President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dine together in Washington, D.C.

President Donald Trump holds a bilateral dinner with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in attendance, at the White House in Washington, D.C., July 7, 2025. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

ISRAEL ACCEPTS TRUMP-LED CEASEFIRE PLAN THAT COULD END GAZA WAR WITHIN 60 DAYS

Trump appeared optimistic about the possibility of Israel and Hamas reaching a deal to end the war. On July 16, while signing the HALT Fentanyl Act, Trump thanked Witkoff, praising him for doing «a fantastic job» and said that there was «some good news on Gaza,» though he did not elaborate.

Abraham Accords signing

From left to right, Foreign Affairs Minister of Bahrain Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani, Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu, President Donald Trump and Foreign Affairs Minister of the United Arab Emirates Abdullah bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan participate in the signing ceremony of the Abraham Accords on the South Lawn of the White House on Sept. 15, 2020, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

TRUMP PRESSURES ISRAEL TO END GAZA CONFLICT AS HE EYES ABRAHAM ACCORDS EXPANSION

Advertisement

If Trump can secure an end to the war, it could mean an expansion of the Abraham Accords, one of the signature efforts of Trump’s first administration, which saw Israel sign normalization agreements with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan. However, Trump has yet to detail which countries would be added.

Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Gideon Sa’ar said on June 30 that Israel was «serious» about seeking an end to the conflict. He added that Jerusalem has an interest in «countries, such as Syria and Lebanon, our neighbors, to the circle of peace and normalization.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Greg Wehner and Caitlin McFall contributed to this report.


Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias