Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Trump urged to review UN immunity, lax visa rules amid national security concerns

Published

on


A 1947 agreement outlining obligations as host of the United Nations continues to give employees and their family members relatively unfettered access to the U.S. 

At a time of increased national security fears and immigration enforcement by the Trump administration, experts are urging a re-examination of the host nation agreement with an eye to the functional immunity granted to U.N. staff and the limited vetting given to those with U.N. visas.

Advertisement

«The United States appears to have taken a relaxed view of the individuals entering the country associated with the U.N., either as employees or as representatives of various country missions. And yet we know that U.N. employees have had, and continue to have, close, direct relationships with terrorist organizations, like UNRWA and Hamas,» Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and president of Human Rights Voices, told Fox News Digital.

UN WATCHDOG PROJECT CALLS ON DOGE CAUCUS TO ‘AUDIT’ THE INTERNATIONAL ORG

Sergey Lavrov, Russia’s minister for foreign affairs, talks with Vassily Nebenzia, Russia’s U.N. ambassador, during a meeting of the U.N. Security Council, April 24, 2023. (AP Photo/John Minchillo)

Advertisement

Bayefsky said there is «a disconnect between the welcome routine and the significant harm to American interests. Hosting the U.N. does not require the host country to facilitate or endure threats to its national security.»

The federal government grants G visas to employees, spouses and children of international organizations, including the U.N., who reside in, or are visiting, the U.S. According to the State Department’s website, «if you are entitled to a G visa, under U.S. visa law, you must receive a G visa. The exceptions to this rule are extremely limited.» The Department of State also explains that «Embassies and consulates generally do not require an interview for those applying for G-1 – 4 and NATO-1 – 6 visas, although a consular officer can request an interview.»

Hugh Dugan, a senior advisor to 11 U.S. former ambassadors to the U.N., told Fox News Digital that it «appears to me that the issuance of the G visas for [U.N. employees] is a relatively rubber stamp exercise.» While not requiring interviews of personnel has «become a matter of convenience, frankly, we should always be able to assess a threat to our country.»’

Advertisement

Dugan, a former National Security Council special assistant to the president and senior director for international organization affairs, said nations like Russia and China are only allowed to travel a certain distance from U.N. headquarters. «We are mindful of our adversaries’ activities and presence here, but the door is open to participate in the U.N. and the host country agreement makes that possible so that no country would be barred because of a certain political atmosphere or issue that might be brewing between us and them.»

Raisi United Nations

Former Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi displays the photo of Gen. Kasim Soleimani at the United Nations. (Peter Aitken for Fox News Digital)

Fox News Digital asked the State Department whether it requires interviews for staff from adversarial member states, including Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, North Korea, Iran and China, but received no response. A State Department spokesperson reiterated that consular officers «have full authority to require an in-person interview for any reason.»

Peter Gallo, formerly an investigator with the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), told Fox News Digital that he is particularly concerned about the functional immunity granted to U.N. staff participating in activities related to their employment. Gallo explained that «U.S. legal system has come to accept that pretty much it’s a blanket coverage.» He added that «immunity breeds impunity.»

Advertisement

REPUBLICANS SEEK TO BLOCK THE REAPPOINTMENT OF UN OFFICIAL ACCUSED OF ANTISEMITISM

Gallo claimed that there is an epidemic of sexual offenses and misconduct among U.N. staff. He cited an incident in which a U.N. employee outside the U.S. sexually harassed «a young female in his department.» Gallo said it took two years after receipt of the investigation report for an investigation to be completed, which resulted in the demotion of the offending employee. Gallo said the employee who was harassed, and her harasser remained in the same organization.

Gallo said that if employees take part in misconduct while based at U.N. headquarters, the U.S. government should be able to examine cases and determine whether staff should retain their G visas. 

Advertisement

Dugan said that if U.N. personnel «knew that [immunity] could be lifted at any time by us… they might start behaving a lot differently.» 

China's Vice President Han Zheng addresses the United Nations General Assembly

China’s Vice President Han Zheng addresses the 78th United Nations General Assembly in New York City on Sept. 21, 2023. (Ed Jones/AFP via Getty Images)

In response to questions about whether U.N. staff have been accused of sexual misconduct in the U.S., or whether U.N. staff who engaged in misconduct have had their G visas revoked, a State Department spokesperson explained the department «generally does not provide» revocation statistics. They also said that «all visa applicants, no matter the visa type and where they are located, are continuously vetted.  Security vetting runs from the time of each application, through adjudication of the visa, and afterwards during the validity period of every issued visa, to ensure the individual remains eligible to travel to the United States.»

The spokesperson said officials of the U.N. «are expected to respect applicable laws of the United States, including criminal laws. Failure to do so may constitute an abuse of privileges of residence.» They added that this «applies for those who hold diplomatic immunity for their positions as well.»

Advertisement

Among staff who have raised internal alarm bells is U.N. special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories Francesca Albanese, who traveled to the U.S. in 2024 to deliver a report before the Third Committee of the General Assembly. Albanese, whose antisemitism has been condemned widely by senior U.S. diplomats and the State Department, was allowed to tour multiple U.S. college campuses while in the U.S.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

In addition to qualifying for «rubber stamp» G visas, staff of international organizations like the United Nations can qualify for green cards if they have spent half of at least seven years of employment inside the U.S., or have been in the U.S. for a combined total of 15 years prior to retirement.
 

Advertisement


Advertisement
Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Trump seeks warships from other countries to help secure Strait of Hormuz

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Iran’s decades-long use of the Strait of Hormuz chokepoint for global oil shipping from the Middle East will come to an end, according to President Donald Trump, and he is rallying the world to free it.

Advertisement

«Many Countries, especially those who are affected by Iran’s attempted closure of the Hormuz Strait, will be sending War Ships, in conjunction with the United States of America, to keep the Strait open and safe,» Trump wrote Saturday morning on Truth Social.

Iran closing the strait has roiled global oil supply, causing gas price increases even in the states, despite the fact the U.S. is a net-exporter of oil and gets only a fraction of its oil from the Middle East. Trump is calling on those countries relying on the oil tankers from the strait to share in the responsibility to free it up.

«We have already destroyed 100% of Iran’s Military capability, but it’s easy for them to send a drone or two, drop a mine, or deliver a close range missile somewhere along, or in, this Waterway, no matter how badly defeated they are,» Trump’s post continued. «Hopefully China, France, Japan, South Korea, the UK, and others, that are affected by this artificial constraint, will send Ships to the area so that the Hormuz Strait will no longer be a threat by a Nation that has been totally decapitated.»

Advertisement

US ‘WINNING DECISIVELY’ AGAINST IRAN, WILL ACHIEVE ‘COMPLETE CONTROL’ OF AIRSPACE WITHIN DAYS, HEGSETH SAYS

The Iranian regime is using sea mines, which it has stockpiled in the thousands, to make traversing the Strait of Hormuz difficult and deadly. (Win McNamee/Getty Images; Eranicle/iStock)

Trump vowed a massive campaign to knock out Iran’s ability to terrorize the oil tankers transversing the region.

Advertisement

«In the meantime, the United States will be bombing the hell out of the shoreline, and continually shooting Iranian Boats and Ships out of the water,» he concluded. «One way or the other, we will soon get the Hormuz Strait OPEN, SAFE, and FREE!»

Trump added in another Truth Social post five hours later that the countries relying on that Middle East oil must take responsibility for it now, too.

WATCH SHIPPING THROUGH THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ GRIND TO A HALT AMID IRAN CONFLICT

Advertisement
Marine vessels moving through the Strait of Hormuz in a timelapse video.

A timelapse video shows marine traffic moving through the Strait of Hormuz. (Kpler/Marine Traffic)

«The United States of America has beaten and completely decimated Iran, both Militarily, Economically, and in every other way, but the Countries of the World that receive Oil through the Hormuz Strait must take care of that passage, and we will help — A LOT!» Trump wrote. «The U.S. will also coordinate with those Countries so that everything goes quickly, smoothly, and well. This should have always been a team effort, and now it will be — It will bring the World together toward Harmony, Security, and Everlasting Peace!»

None of those countries gave any immediate indication ​they would do so. In fact, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi claimed both China and Russia are «strategic partners» supporting defense against U.S. and Israel-led aggression.

«That includes military cooperation,» he told MS Now in an interview Saturday. «I’m not going into the into any details of that, a good cooperation with these countries, politically, economically, even militarily.»

Advertisement

IRAN WAR, 11 DAYS IN: US CONTROLS SKIES, OIL SURGES AND THE REGION BRACES FOR WHAT’S NEXT

Araghchi is perpetuating a «confused policy,» according to the United Arab Emirates, as the Islamic Revolution Guard contends the strait will remain closed, while the foreign minister suggests all countries other than the U.S. or Israel will be permitted to pass.

«As a matter of fact, the Strait of Hormuz is open,» Araghchi said. «It is only closed to the tankers and ships belong[ing] to our enemies, to those who are attacking us and their allies. Others are free to pass.»

Advertisement

Takayuki ⁠Kobayashi, Japan’s ruling party policy chief, told public broadcaster NHK that «the (legal) threshold is very high.»

TRUMP SAYS US ‘OBLITERATED’ TARGETS IN STRIKE ON KEY IRANIAN OIL HUB

Japan interprets its pacifist postwar constitution to mean it can deploy its military if the nation’s survival is threatened, but the government would have to invoke a 2015 security law that has not been used.

Advertisement

South Korea’s presidential office said it would decide on Trump’s request after a «careful ⁠review.»

France is seeking ​to assemble a coalition to secure the strait once the security situation stabilizes, while Britain is discussing a ​range of options with allies to ensure the security of shipping, officials have said.

Satellite view showing the Strait of Hormuz connecting the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman

A satellite image shows the Strait of Hormuz, a key maritime passage connecting the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman, vital for global energy supply. (Amanda Macias/Fox News Digital)

IRAN WAR JEOPARDIZES TRUMP ECONOMIC BOOM BEFORE KEY MIDTERM ELECTIONS

Advertisement

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, who replaced his slain father and who the U.S. and Israel understand to be injured, has said the Strait of Hormuz should remain closed.

War Secretary Pete Hegseth says the new supreme leader was «disfigured» in the initial strikes that killed his father late last month.

«There is no problem with the new supreme leader,» Araghchi told MS Now. «The system is working.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«Everything is under control.»

Reuters contributed to this report.

Advertisement



war with iran,donald trump,finance economy

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

New guard of GOP women say Democrats can’t ‘pigeonhole’ female voters as they target key House races

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A new wave of Republican women running in competitive congressional races is aiming to chip away at Democrats’ long-held advantage with female voters — and flip key seats that could determine control of the House this November.

Advertisement

In an interview with Fox News Digital, one of these candidates, Laurie Buckhout, a former cattle rancher, U.S. Army veteran and mother, knocked the Democratic Party for trying to «pigeonhole» female voters into a single category.

«The Democrats try way too hard to pigeonhole us women in a certain role while they still can’t define what a woman is,» she quipped.

She believes that despite the rhetoric, Democrats are «really out of touch when it comes to women voters.»

Advertisement

DEMOCRATS SINK TO NEW VOTER LOW, REPUBLICANS ALSO UNDERWATER: POLL

Left to right: Republican congressional candidates Laurie Buckhout, N.C., Tiffany Burress, N.J., Jessica Steinmann, Texas, and Barb Regnitz, Ind. (Courtesy of the campaigns of an coCourtesy of the campaigns for Laurie Buckhout, Tiffany Burress, Jessica Steinmann and Barb Regnitz)

«They try to own that gender and try to stuff them in a box,» she went on. «’This is how you’re going to vote. Don’t tell your husband. This is how you are going to think.’ Republicans don’t do that.»

Advertisement

This midterm election, Buckhout is running to unseat Democratic Rep. Don Davis in North Carolina’s Congressional District 1. The district stretches across the northeastern corner of the state from the border with Virginia to the Atlantic coast. After narrowly losing to Davis in the 2024 election, Buckhout’s campaign has already garnered significant momentum this time around. She defeated a field of four other Republican candidates in the March 3 primary and, just this week, was further bolstered by an endorsement from President Donald Trump.

As the dominant party in an off-year midterm cycle, many expect that Republicans will take a beating at the ballot box this November. Buckhout, however, thinks it will be a very different story in North Carolina. With the GOP barely grasping onto a razor-thin majority in the House of Representatives, every seat matters.

«I can tell you the people of North Carolina, especially eastern North Carolina, they want to live their lives with a minimum of government interference, they don’t want big government leaning in, telling them how to live their life, what to do, taking their money out of their pockets for more and more taxes for programs that they don’t need and they didn’t vote for,» she said. «So, I can tell you that we feel very good about this being a Republican election, taking this, adding another seat to the House.»

Advertisement

Buckhout is not the only female Republican candidate who stands a good shot at flipping a blue district red this year.

In one of the GOP’s top targeted districts, Carrie Buck, a former school principal and self-described minivan mom, is angling to unseat Rep. Dina Titus in Nevada Congressional District 1 in Las Vegas. As of the latest Federal Election Commission filings, Buck has significantly outraised Titus, further signaling the incumbent’s vulnerability.

MINIVAN MOM PUTS DEM INCUMBENT ON NOTICE IN TOP GOP TARGET DISTRICT: ‘SHE HAS DONE NOTHING FOR US’

Advertisement
Dina Titus and Carrie Buck

Left: Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nev. Right: Nevada state Sen. Carrie Buck, who is running for Congress. (Ethan Miller/Getty Images; Campaign for Carrie Buck)

Buck told Fox News Digital that after serving in Congress since 2013, Titus has «had her chance, and Nevada families are still waiting for results.»  

«I spent 30 years in classrooms — teaching, running schools, and working to fix problems. During that same time, Dina Titus was in public office, unable and unwilling to address the challenges Nevadans face: rising inflation, soaring crime rates, an open border, and failing schools,» she said.

On the East Coast, Tiffany Burress, a New Jersey attorney who is a newcomer to the political scene, is running to unseat Democratic Rep. Nellie Pou, who is considered vulnerable.

Advertisement

If the GOP could pick up the seat, it would be a huge boon in retaining the majority.

«Voters are ready for something different, and that’s how I know we’re going to win,» Burress told Fox News.

She knocked Pou, saying she has «spent decades living on the taxpayers’ dime,» and «puts extreme progressive agendas ahead of the priorities of our district» by voting with the likes of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez nearly 94 percent of the time.

Advertisement

LEGALIZE PROSTITUTION EFFORT LEFT CANDIDATE ‘SHOCKED’ IN BLUE STATE WITH RAMPANT HUMAN TRAFFICKING

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks from a podium to address reporters

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., and Republicans are attempting to retain their majority this midterm election cycle. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Similarly, Barb Regnitz in Indiana’s first congressional district is running to flip a long-held Democratic seat currently filled by Rep. Frank Mrvan.

Regnitz, who is a former software engineer and current Porter County commissioner, told Fox News Digital that «for almost 100 years, Republicans have been powerless to stop the failed policies of the far-left that have resulted in falling incomes, struggling industry, and increasingly unsafe communities right here in Northwest Indiana.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«I’m running for Congress because I believe our district deserves serious, principled leadership focused on results, not rhetoric,» she said.

Down in Texas, another Republican woman, Jessica Steinmann, is fighting to retain a Republican seat north of Houston, being left vacant by Rep. Morgan Luttrell, who opted not to seek re-election.

Advertisement

Steinmann formerly served in President Donald Trump’s Justice Department during his first term as director of the Office for Victims of Crime.

She told Fox News Digital she is running for Congress «because the next two years of President Trump’s administration are critical for our country.»

«I was proud to serve in the first Trump Administration, where I saw firsthand what strong, America First leadership can accomplish,» she said, adding, «I’m confident that message will carry us to victory in November.»

Advertisement

elections,republicans,politics,house of representatives politics,midterm elections,democratic party

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Como Succession, pero en la vida real: el escándalo familiar que hundió el imperio de los hermanos Barclay

Published

on


Fueron una dupla inseparable, exitosa, implacable y muy discreta. Nadie sabía demasiado de ellos. Que eran idénticos físicamente y los hombres que manejaban la mayor fortuna inglesa eran los únicos dos datos certeros que se tenía sobre su vida. Pero eso cambió. La familia Barclay cayó. Debieron vender (y hasta malvender) sus negocios y las propiedades que habían forjado su fortuna (y su orgullo) y declararse en bancarrota. En el medio de ese proceso, los secretos familiares, las historias, bajezas, mezquindades y delitos cometidos contra primos, tíos y hermanos se difundieron por toda Gran Bretaña.

En 2020, la revista Fortune los puso en la cima de las fortunas británicas. Más de 10.000 millones de dólares. Seis años después no queda nada del imperio que David y Frederick Barclay construyeron durante décadas.

Advertisement

Leé también: Fue un ícono sexual de Hollywood, tomó muchas malas decisiones y ahora no tiene dónde vivir

Los Barclay poseían grandes tiendas, el mayor sitio de venta electrónica, eran los desarrolladores inmobiliarios más importantes, navieras, negocios energéticos y habían adquirido un emporio de prensa. Las internas familiares, las traiciones y la ambición desmesurada los hicieron perder todo. Como si la serie Succession hubiera tomado forma en la vida real.

En esta historia hay divorcios escandalosos, peleas fraternas, sobrinos traicionando tíos, espionaje intrafamiliar, traiciones, pésimas decisiones, préstamos impagables, quiebras fraudulentas y el desmoronamiento sorpresivo de un emporio que poco tiempo atrás parecía inexpugnable.

Advertisement

David Barclay y su esposa, Zoe Newton, en 1955. (Foto: AP)

Los gemelos Barclay nacieron en 1934 en una zona pobre de Londres. La casa quedaba pegada a las vías: cada vez que pasaba el tren temblaba cada mueble. El padre era panadero. Luego trabajó como vendedor callejero de golosinas. El hombre murió joven cuando sus hijos tenían 12 años. David y Frederick debieron a salir a trabajar para poder subsistir; no alcanzaba con lo que ganaba la madre.

Sin estudios formales se lanzaron a la vida adulta. A los 16 años encontraron trabajo juntos en la parte contable de General Electric. Ese sería su primer trabajo formal y ya no se separarían más. Con sus primeros ahorros y mientras uno cubría al otro en la oficina, comenzaron a vender y alquilar propiedades. Era fácil que no se notara la ausencia de uno de ellos: el parecido físico era sorprendente, eran idénticos fisonómicamente, tanto que para distinguirlos se requería que el interlocutor los conociera mucho.

Advertisement

Les fue muy bien en el rubro inmobiliario. David era audaz y solía no respetar los límites; Frederick era más estructurado y lograba poner en orden lo que David producía. Ambos eran voraces y ambiciosos. Negociaban con dureza pero nunca perdían la elegancia. Mantuvieron gratitud con esa actividad. Ya convertidos en magnates, cada vez que su agentes de prensa mandaban un currículum sobre ellos, comenzaban diciendo que eran exagentes inmobiliarios. Ese había sido el comienzo.

Primero fueron algunas casas, después grandes terrenos y edificios, por último, shoppings y grandes emprendimientos. Se dieron cuenta de que el verdadero negocio no estaba en la intermediación sino en generar ellos las condiciones. Tomaron decisiones audaces y en pocos años, los Hermanos Barclay -como unidad, simbióticamente conectados: dicen que uno podía completar las frases del otro- eran uno los grandes jugadores de los negocios en Gran Bretaña y en Europa.

El castillo de los hermanos Barclay, en Brecqhou, una de las islas del canal. (Foto: Wikipedia)

El castillo de los hermanos Barclay, en Brecqhou, una de las islas del canal. (Foto: Wikipedia)

La diversificación de negocios fue extraordinaria. Una cadena gigantesca -que parecía que llegaba a cada rincón de las islas- de grandes tiendas, un negocio pionero en la venta electrónica, hoteles.

Advertisement

Los primeros hoteles que compraron no eran tales. Eran pequeñas y desvencijadas pensiones al costado de las vías del tren. Pero el ferrocarril se expandió y esos terrenos se vendieron por fortunas -no se sabe si tuvieron suerte, un olfato extraordinario o información reservada: lo cierto es que fue un negocio excepcional-. Después, cuando ya eran millonarios, compraron la verdadera joya de su emporio: El Hotel Ritz de Londres, sinónimo de lujo y sofisticación.

David, ya en la década del noventa, quiso expandirse hacia la prensa. Frederick no estaba tan convencido. David le explicaba que además de dinero, los diarios y revistas les darían poder. Primero compraron The European, el intento de Robert Maxwell de crear un diario para todo el continente. Pero la incursión fue un fracaso. Luego de invertir más de 80 millones de libras, lo cerraron ante las escasas ventas. Pero David insistió.

Compraron The Telegraph -el Daily Telegraph y el Sunday, una institución, y se convirtieron en hombres de medios. Algunos de sus principales gerentes y jefes de sección dijeron que los Barclay casi no se metían. Fredrick decía que los diarios eran asunto de David: “Él es el loco de los medios; yo solo firmo los cheques”. David, por su parte, se vanagloria de su influencia: “Puse muchos millones para comprar la jugueteria. Así que cada tanto voy y uso los juguetes”.

Advertisement
David y Frederick Barclay junto a la reina y el duque de Edimburgo, en 1999. (Foto: AP)

David y Frederick Barclay junto a la reina y el duque de Edimburgo, en 1999. (Foto: AP)

Los hermanos solían tener gran relación con las personas que manejaban Inglaterra. Margaret Thatcher murió en el Ritz y Boris Johnson jamás era atacado en las páginas de sus diarios.

Los Barclay hicieron de la reclusión y de la discreción un estilo de vida. Poco se sabía de sus familias, de sus movimientos y hasta de sus gustos. Vivían en Montecarlo y luego construyeron una mansión majestuosa en Brecqhou, una de las Islas del Canal, perteneciente a Sark, que conforma un ente separado del Reino Unido. Nada se sabía de lo que ocurría en la mansión.

Se decía que los hermanos gastaron más de 100 millones de dólares en su construcción, que los caminos de la isla eran de mármol, que tenía varias piscinas olímpicas, un búnker antinuclear y demás. Lo que se sabe con certeza es que contaba con un moderno helipuerto, porque los gemelos llegaban a Londres en helicóptero desde su casa. Y que para viajar en auto sólo se trasladaban en alguno de los muchos Rolls Royce que integraban su flota.

Advertisement

Leé también: Era recolector de basura, ganó US$13 millones en la lotería y lo perdió todo: “¿Qué esperabas que pasara?»

David tenía 3 hijos y Frederick tiene una hija. Todos vivían juntos en la gran mansión. Una familia ensamblada sui generis.

Los Barclay quedaron envueltos en un escandalo económico familiar y fue Frederick quien confrontó a los hijos de David. (Foto: AP)

Los Barclay quedaron envueltos en un escandalo económico familiar y fue Frederick quien confrontó a los hijos de David. (Foto: AP)

El secreto que dominaba la vida íntima de la familia, muchas veces se extendía a los negocios y a su forma de obtener beneficios, grandes contratos y de apoderarse de firmas preexistentes. Los Barclay obtenían, gracias a sus contactos políticos y a las presiones que podían ejercer desde sus medios, préstamos muy beneficiosos que les permitían hacer negocios casi sin riesgo.

Advertisement

La primera grieta, el primer estiletazo mediático, llegó con el divorcio de Frederick. Hubo, como no podía ser de otro modo, disputas por la división de la fortuna con la exesposa. En Inglaterra esos procesos son públicos. Los tabloides se prepararon para hacerse un festín con las revelaciones que nunca habían tenido. Pareció que Frederick Barclay, aconsejado por David, se ahorraba la exposición y el escarnio con un arreglo por 100 millones de libras. Pero el acuerdo nunca se pagó y la exesposa volvió a accionar contra él. En el medio la salud de David desmejoró y sus hijos tomaron más relevancia.

Una de las mansiones que los Barclay tenían en la zona de Hyde Park, de Inglaterra. (Foto: AFP)

Una de las mansiones que los Barclay tenían en la zona de Hyde Park, de Inglaterra. (Foto: AFP)

Casi simultáneamente dos cimbronazos que terminarían siendo el comienzo del fin del emporio Barclay. Por un lado, Frederick no cumplió con el acuerdo. Por el otro, el mismo Frederick accionó contra uno de sus sobrinos acusándolo de grabar ilegalmente sus conversaciones con su hija, para enterarse qué decisiones tomarían su tío y su prima respecto a las sociedades que manejaban.

El proceso por las escuchas se convirtió en un nuevo escándalo. Los Barclay, que siempre habían conseguido esquivar los chismes y la tapa de los tabloides, habían caído en ese terreno y resultaban -por novedosos y millonarios- la atracción principal del circo del amarillismo.

Advertisement
Aidan y Howard Barclay, los hijos de David. (Foto: AP)

Aidan y Howard Barclay, los hijos de David. (Foto: AP)

De pronto las versiones, las voces extraoficiales y las declaraciones que había que leer entrelíneas se convirtieron en el tema principal de conversación en Inglaterra.

El mazazo final fue la muerte de David en 2021. Los Barclay, que siempre se habían mantenido unidos y que siempre habían consensuado sus decisiones, se atomizaron. La sucesión de David se convirtió en un campo de batalla cruento e inclemente. Los hijos de David salieron a confrontar a su tío Frederick y a la hija de éste, su prima. En ese contexto intentaron grabar las conversaciones que mantenían en una oficina del Ritz.

Cuando los Barclay ya eran millonarios, compraron la verdadera joya de su emporio: El Hotel Ritz de Londres, sinónimo de lujo y sofisticación. (Foto: AP)

Cuando los Barclay ya eran millonarios, compraron la verdadera joya de su emporio: El Hotel Ritz de Londres, sinónimo de lujo y sofisticación. (Foto: AP)

Ese juicio volvió a sacar a la luz secretos e inquinas familiares.

Advertisement

Frederick dijo que no podía pagar lo que la ex esposa reclamaba, que las empresas no funcionaban bien. Al principio se creyó que era una más de sus mentiras y dilaciones -que le valieron varias advertencias de los jueces- pero de a poco se fue conociendo como el Imperio Barclay se iba desmembrando.

Aparecieron deudas impagables y préstamos incumplidos. Los bancos se quedaron con varios de sus negocios; la empresa de venta electrónica -competidora de Amazon- pasé a ser propiedad de un conglomerado de bancos. El Ritz fue vendido a un jeque árabe en varios cientos de millones de libras. Sin embargo los expertos afirman que fue pagado a la mitad de su valor real porque a la familia -ya desmembrada- le urgía tener fondos.

A comparación de David, Frederick Barclay era más estructurado y lograba poner en orden lo que su hermano producía. (Foto: AFP)

A comparación de David, Frederick Barclay era más estructurado y lograba poner en orden lo que su hermano producía. (Foto: AFP)

El Telegraph fue vendido en 2003 pero entre objeciones judiciales, presentaciones e impugnaciones del estado, la operación quedó congelada. Los compradores originales terminaron desistiendo pero un nuevo grupo ofertó más de 600 millones. La venta se cerró pocos días atrás. Ese fue el final definitivo de la familia Barclay en el mundo de los grandes negocios.

Advertisement

Leé también: Sospechaba que su marido la engañaba, revisó su computadora y descubrió un horror inimaginable

Un gigante que implosionó. Que terminó derrumbándose por problemas familiares. Los asuntos del corazón mal gestionados costaron la extinción del monstruo de 10.000 millones de dólares.

Succession, Inglaterra, fortunas, Sumario

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias