Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Trump urged to review UN immunity, lax visa rules amid national security concerns

Published

on


A 1947 agreement outlining obligations as host of the United Nations continues to give employees and their family members relatively unfettered access to the U.S. 

At a time of increased national security fears and immigration enforcement by the Trump administration, experts are urging a re-examination of the host nation agreement with an eye to the functional immunity granted to U.N. staff and the limited vetting given to those with U.N. visas.

Advertisement

«The United States appears to have taken a relaxed view of the individuals entering the country associated with the U.N., either as employees or as representatives of various country missions. And yet we know that U.N. employees have had, and continue to have, close, direct relationships with terrorist organizations, like UNRWA and Hamas,» Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and president of Human Rights Voices, told Fox News Digital.

UN WATCHDOG PROJECT CALLS ON DOGE CAUCUS TO ‘AUDIT’ THE INTERNATIONAL ORG

Sergey Lavrov, Russia’s minister for foreign affairs, talks with Vassily Nebenzia, Russia’s U.N. ambassador, during a meeting of the U.N. Security Council, April 24, 2023. (AP Photo/John Minchillo)

Advertisement

Bayefsky said there is «a disconnect between the welcome routine and the significant harm to American interests. Hosting the U.N. does not require the host country to facilitate or endure threats to its national security.»

The federal government grants G visas to employees, spouses and children of international organizations, including the U.N., who reside in, or are visiting, the U.S. According to the State Department’s website, «if you are entitled to a G visa, under U.S. visa law, you must receive a G visa. The exceptions to this rule are extremely limited.» The Department of State also explains that «Embassies and consulates generally do not require an interview for those applying for G-1 – 4 and NATO-1 – 6 visas, although a consular officer can request an interview.»

Hugh Dugan, a senior advisor to 11 U.S. former ambassadors to the U.N., told Fox News Digital that it «appears to me that the issuance of the G visas for [U.N. employees] is a relatively rubber stamp exercise.» While not requiring interviews of personnel has «become a matter of convenience, frankly, we should always be able to assess a threat to our country.»’

Advertisement

Dugan, a former National Security Council special assistant to the president and senior director for international organization affairs, said nations like Russia and China are only allowed to travel a certain distance from U.N. headquarters. «We are mindful of our adversaries’ activities and presence here, but the door is open to participate in the U.N. and the host country agreement makes that possible so that no country would be barred because of a certain political atmosphere or issue that might be brewing between us and them.»

Raisi United Nations

Former Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi displays the photo of Gen. Kasim Soleimani at the United Nations. (Peter Aitken for Fox News Digital)

Fox News Digital asked the State Department whether it requires interviews for staff from adversarial member states, including Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, North Korea, Iran and China, but received no response. A State Department spokesperson reiterated that consular officers «have full authority to require an in-person interview for any reason.»

Peter Gallo, formerly an investigator with the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), told Fox News Digital that he is particularly concerned about the functional immunity granted to U.N. staff participating in activities related to their employment. Gallo explained that «U.S. legal system has come to accept that pretty much it’s a blanket coverage.» He added that «immunity breeds impunity.»

Advertisement

REPUBLICANS SEEK TO BLOCK THE REAPPOINTMENT OF UN OFFICIAL ACCUSED OF ANTISEMITISM

Gallo claimed that there is an epidemic of sexual offenses and misconduct among U.N. staff. He cited an incident in which a U.N. employee outside the U.S. sexually harassed «a young female in his department.» Gallo said it took two years after receipt of the investigation report for an investigation to be completed, which resulted in the demotion of the offending employee. Gallo said the employee who was harassed, and her harasser remained in the same organization.

Gallo said that if employees take part in misconduct while based at U.N. headquarters, the U.S. government should be able to examine cases and determine whether staff should retain their G visas. 

Advertisement

Dugan said that if U.N. personnel «knew that [immunity] could be lifted at any time by us… they might start behaving a lot differently.» 

China's Vice President Han Zheng addresses the United Nations General Assembly

China’s Vice President Han Zheng addresses the 78th United Nations General Assembly in New York City on Sept. 21, 2023. (Ed Jones/AFP via Getty Images)

In response to questions about whether U.N. staff have been accused of sexual misconduct in the U.S., or whether U.N. staff who engaged in misconduct have had their G visas revoked, a State Department spokesperson explained the department «generally does not provide» revocation statistics. They also said that «all visa applicants, no matter the visa type and where they are located, are continuously vetted.  Security vetting runs from the time of each application, through adjudication of the visa, and afterwards during the validity period of every issued visa, to ensure the individual remains eligible to travel to the United States.»

The spokesperson said officials of the U.N. «are expected to respect applicable laws of the United States, including criminal laws. Failure to do so may constitute an abuse of privileges of residence.» They added that this «applies for those who hold diplomatic immunity for their positions as well.»

Advertisement

Among staff who have raised internal alarm bells is U.N. special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories Francesca Albanese, who traveled to the U.S. in 2024 to deliver a report before the Third Committee of the General Assembly. Albanese, whose antisemitism has been condemned widely by senior U.S. diplomats and the State Department, was allowed to tour multiple U.S. college campuses while in the U.S.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

In addition to qualifying for «rubber stamp» G visas, staff of international organizations like the United Nations can qualify for green cards if they have spent half of at least seven years of employment inside the U.S., or have been in the U.S. for a combined total of 15 years prior to retirement.
 

Advertisement


Advertisement
Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Gran Bretaña: el príncipe Harry y su padre, el rey Carlos III, inician el largo camino de la reconciliación

Published

on


¿Habemus paix? El largo camino de reconciliación entre el rey Charlos III y su hijo Harry se ha iniciado en Londres. En la terraza y los salones del Royal Over-Seas League, un club privado que promociona la solidaridad y del que es patrón el soberano, fue el escenario del encuentro el miércoles pasado entre el secretario de comunicaciones del rey, Tobyn Andreae, y Meredith Maines, la jefa de comunicaciones de la Corte de Montesito, que el príncipe Harry a creado para la organización de sus actividades.

Junto a ella estaba Liam Maguire, quien dirige las operaciones de relaciones públicas de los Sussex en Reino Unido y es un militar egresado de Sandhurst, la misma academia militar que Harry.

Advertisement

El encuentro se inició con unos tragos en la terraza y prosiguió en el interior del club. Andreae llegó al lugar con un regalo de la vinería de la que se provee la Familia real en Mayfair.

Un largo proceso

Así se inició un proceso de reconciliación, que llevará tiempo, aclaraciones y perdones. O al menos un canal de comunicación.

Advertisement

El príncipe Harry tenía sus vínculos rotos con la Familia Real, tras la publicación de Spare, su libro de memorias, la entrevista donde hablaron del racismo de la familia real y por los juicios que él ha liderado en los tribunales británicos para recuperar su seguridad.

Pero al perder la última instancia “en una operación” en la que acusó “al establishment”, Harry dijo en una entrevista con la BBC que había llegado la hora de la reconciliación con su familia. “La vida es preciosa” dijo, al reconocer que no sabía cuánto más vivirá su padre, enfermo de cáncer.

«No tiene sentido seguir luchando», dijo el quinto en la línea de sucesión al trono. El Duque añadió: «El perdón es totalmente posible porque quiero recuperar a mi padre y a mi hermano».

Advertisement
Rey Carlos III y el principe Harry. Foto AFP

Así envió mails al palacio invitando al rey a participar en los juegos Invictus, que ha creado y que se celebrarán en Birminghan en el 2027. Pretende que asista la Familia Real para honrar a sus veteranos y heridos de guerra. Lo hizo con tiempo para que pudiera ingresar en la agenda a largo plazo de su padre. Para los Royals es difícil decir que no a los heridos, que combatieron “por el rey, la reina y su país”.

La reunión en un club privado supuso un avance extraordinario en las relaciones entre ambas casas, que en los últimos años habían tenido poca interacción. El rey prácticamente no conoce a sus nietos, Archie y Lilibet.

“No hubo una agenda formal, solo unas copas informales. Había temas de los que ambas partes querían hablar» dijo la fuente royal.

Advertisement

La filtración a los tabloides

El problema es que el encuentro fue filtrado al Mail on Sunday, un tabloid con el que los Sussex se han enfrentado y esa filtración solo puede venir del interior del palacio. Enfureció a los Sussex, a quien los Royals los acusan de indiscreciones. Todos los tabloides británicos recuperaron la noticia del Mail on Sunday, un tabloid a quien Harry le ganó un juicio por violar su privacidad e interceptara sus conversaciones telefónicas desde adolescente.

Una fuente declaró al Mail on Sunday: «Hay un largo camino por recorrer. Pero ahora se ha abierto un canal de comunicación por primera vez en años. No hubo una agenda formal, solo unas copas informales. Había temas de los que ambas partes querían hablar».

Advertisement

Se celebró en el club de la Royal Over-Seas League, muy cerca de Clarence House, la casa del rey en Londres. La jefa de comunicaciones Merethit Maines y Maguire llegaron el miércoles pasado en taxi a las 15.50, seguidos por el secretario de comunicaciones Andreae, quien parecía llevar un regalo de Berry Bros and Rudd, el comerciante de vinos y licores. Los periodistas habían sido alertados y pudieron hacer fotos.

Los tres fueron fotografiados charlando mientras tomaban algo en la terraza del jardín del primer piso del club, con vistas a Green Park, antes de entrar.

Los príncipes Harry y William.Los príncipes Harry y William.

Todos los involucrados reconocían que queda un largo camino por recorrer, con desconfianza por ambas partes.

La fuente describió la cumbre como solo el «primer paso hacia la reconciliación entre Harry y su padre. Pero al menos es un paso en la dirección correcta».

Advertisement

«Todos quieren seguir adelante». Finalmente llegó el momento oportuno para que ambas partes dialogaran. Una posible oportunidad para una reconciliación pública, que se está debatiendo tanto en Londres como en California, son los Juegos Invictus de 2027 en Birmingham.

Su posible asistencia está siendo considerada por altos funcionarios del palacio, conscientes de que los Juegos podrían ser una oportunidad oportuna para reconciliarse.

La guerra de los Sussex

Advertisement

La disputa entre ambas partes surgió cuando los Sussex dejaron sus deberes reales para comenzar una nueva vida en el extranjero. Las intensas negociaciones que tuvieron lugar mientras se negociaban a puerta cerrada, en la cumbre de Sandringham, los términos de su «acuerdo de salida» dejaron rencor entre ambas partes.

Los rencores y maldades fueron mutuas. A los Sussex les quitaron el título de Altezas Reales, a Harry la posibilidad de usar su propio uniforme militar ,cuando es veterano de guerra, y sus patrocinios militares. Lo sacaron de la Familia Real, sin dinero y sin status.

La Familia Real quedó devastada por algo que no esperaban: las dañinas acusaciones de racismo, las revelaciones familiares íntimas, los mensajes de texto y las conversaciones compartidas en las numerosas entrevistas televisivas posteriores de los Sussex y en Spare, las memorias del príncipe Harry. No dejaron a Meghan asistir a la muerte de la reina en Balmoral ni le avisaron a Harry, que se enteró por la BBC.

Advertisement

El príncipe William estaba furioso por la imagen que se había dado a su esposa. Se sentía «mortificado» de que su hermano los hubiera traicionado con fines comerciales. La realidad era que los Royals creían que Harry era una víctima de Meghan, que había urdido y organizado el casamiento que su hermano Wiilliam había querido impedir, y no querían aceptarla como parte de la familia.

Los príncipes de Gales, William y Harry de Gran Bretaña reaccionan cuando el ataúd de la reina Isabel de Gran Bretaña llega al Westminster Hall desde el Palacio de Buckingham para su velatorio, en Londres, Gran Bretaña, el 14 de septiembre de 2022. Foto ReutersLos príncipes de Gales, William y Harry de Gran Bretaña reaccionan cuando el ataúd de la reina Isabel de Gran Bretaña llega al Westminster Hall desde el Palacio de Buckingham para su velatorio, en Londres, Gran Bretaña, el 14 de septiembre de 2022. Foto Reuters

La ruptura se acentuó significativamente tras la entrevista de los Sussex con Oprah Winfrey en 2021, durante la cual alegaron que un miembro de la familia real estaba preocupado por el tono de piel de su hijo Archie antes de su nacimiento. Fue identificado posteriormente: era el rey Charles y Kate, la princesa de Gales, durante una conversación. Archie es pelirrojo, como su padre.

Posteriormente, el duque afirmó en sus controvertidas memorias, que su hermano William lo había agredido físicamente a causa de Meghan. Denunció que el rey anteponía sus propios intereses a los de Harry y estaba celoso de Meghan.

Cuando al rey le diagnosticaron cáncer en enero de 2023, el príncipe Harry se sintió tan afectado que emprendió una carrera transatlántica para ver a su padre. Solo pudo verlo 30 minutos y frente a Camilla, la reina, a quien él considera la razón por el sufrimiento de su madre, la princesa Diana y su divorcio.

Advertisement

Pero la decisión del duque de enfrentarse al gobierno en el Tribunal Superior por su acceso a la protección policial, financiada por el estado, profundizó la división.

La prolongada disputa legal causó gran preocupación en el Palacio de Buckingham. Sobre todo después de que el duque dejara claro que creía que el rey podía intervenir en su nombre para ayudar a negociar un acuerdo adecuado. El rey estaba tan preocupado por verse involucrado en el caso, que dudaba en interactuar con su propio hijo. Camilla presionaba para que no lo viera.

Meredith Maines, la jefa de comunicación de los Sussex que vive en su mansión de Montecito,regresó inmediatamente a California, después de la reunión.

Advertisement

Harry y Meghan, furiosos

El equipo de Sussex está frustrado tras la publicación en un periódico de detalles de una «cumbre de paz». Ellos niega estar detrás de la filtración. Acusan al palacio, que tiene fluida relación con los tabloides. Son los que permiten, publicando sus historias y fotos, su sobrevivencia como monarquía.

Detalles como el lugar, la hora y la naturaleza de las conversaciones se filtraron al Mail on Sunday. Esto provocó que los asesores fueran fotografiados fuera del club e incluso durante la reunión, mientras disfrutaban de unas copas en un balcón.

Advertisement

La filtración ha puesto en peligro la frágil operación de paz, generando más sospechas y desconfianza en ambas partes y, potencialmente, obligándolas a volver al punto de partida.

Fuentes cercanas al Príncipe Harry insistieron en que los Sussex no fueron responsables . Reconocieron que publicar los detalles de la reunión en las portadas de los periódicos no era la mejor manera de iniciar lo que esperaban que fuera un nuevo período de paz. El Palacio de Buckingham declinó hacer comentarios.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Pentagon presses Japan, Australia on role in possible Taiwan conflict

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Pentagon is reportedly pressuring Indo-Pacific allies Japan and Australia to clarify what roles they would play in the event of a war with China over Taiwan.

Advertisement

Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon’s policy chief, raised the question during recent meetings with Japanese and Australian defense officials, the Financial Times first reported.

While the United States has long urged Indo-Pacific allies to increase defense spending as China escalates its military activity around Taiwan, this push for specific wartime commitments is a new development — and reportedly caught foreign officials off guard.

Australia responded by stressing it would not commit troops in advance of any conflict.

Advertisement

TAIWAN ENVOY URGES CONGRESSIONAL ACTION, WARNS OF RISING CHINA THREAT AFTER MEETING LAWMAKERS

Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon’s policy chief, raised the question during recent meetings with Japanese and Australian defense officials, (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

«The decision to commit Australian troops to a conflict will be made by the government of the day, not in advance,» Defense Minister Pat Conroy told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. «We won’t discuss hypotheticals.»

Advertisement

Australia and the U.S. are currently leading a major joint exercise in Sydney involving 30,000 troops from 19 countries.

Pentagon officials have cited NATO’s efforts to boost European defense spending as a model for what Asian allies should consider. At the same time, Colby has advised European allies to prioritize threats closer to home rather than focus on the Indo-Pacific, sources told Fox News Digital.

«Some among our allies might not welcome frank conversations,» Colby posted on X in response to the report.

Advertisement

«But as the department has made abundantly and consistently clear, we at DOD are focused on implementing the president’s America First, common-sense agenda of restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength. That includes urging allies to step up their defense spending and other efforts related to our collective defense.»

COLBY’S CHINA-FOCUSED PENTAGON PLAYBOOK SPARKS UKRAINE ARMS FREEZE

The question of allied commitments is further complicated by the U.S. policy of strategic ambiguity, under which Washington does not explicitly state whether it would defend Taiwan if China invades.

Advertisement

«As Secretary Hegseth said, the Department of Defense is focused on preventing war, with a strong shield of deterrence,» Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell wrote on X in defense of Colby’s approach. «That requires strength — but it is a simple fact that our allies must also do their part. We do not seek war. What we are doing is ensuring the United States and its allies have the military strength to underwrite diplomacy and guarantee peace.»

Former President Joe Biden had repeatedly said the U.S. would defend Taiwan, only for White House staff to later walk back those comments and insist that U.S. policy has not changed.

President Donald Trump has maintained the tradition of ambiguity, refusing to publicly declare how he would respond. However, new audio obtained by CNN revealed that Trump told donors last year he threatened both Russia and China with military force.

Advertisement
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Japan’s Defense Minister Gen Nakatani inspect an honor guard during a formal welcome ceremony in Tokyo on March 30, 2025.

Japanese Defense Minister Gen Nakatani and U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth review an honor guard in Tokyo. The U.S. has asked Japan to clarify how it would assist in a potential conflict with China. (Kiyoshi Ota/Getty Images)

«With Putin I said, ‘If you go into Ukraine, I’m going to bomb the [expletive] out of Moscow,’» Trump said. «‘I’m telling you. I have no choice.’ And then [Putin] goes, like, ‘I don’t believe you.’ But he believed me 10%.»

«I said the same thing to [Xi],» Trump added. «I said, ‘If you go into Taiwan, I’m going to bomb the [expletive] out of Beijing.’ I said, ‘I have no choice. I’ve got to bomb you.’»

At other times, Trump has criticized the cost of defending Taiwan and argued the island should dedicate 10% of its budget to defense.

Advertisement

Wargaming simulations suggest Japan would be the most crucial ally to the U.S. and Taiwan, as South Korea has not authorized American forces to launch combat operations from its territory. Australia does not permit permanent foreign military bases, but the U.S. is expanding its rotational presence at Australian facilities.

«Japan is always critical, and when I say critical, like we can’t win the war without them,» Mark Cancian, defense expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies who regularly briefs lawmakers on China wargames, told Fox News Digital. 

«Their forces are important, but our ability to use our bases in Japan is critical,» he said, adding that other U.S. bases in the Indo-Pacific like Guam were too far away to serve as a hub. 

Advertisement

TAIWAN CONDUCTS LIVE-FIRE DRILLS WITH US-MADE TANKS AS PRESIDENT LOOKS ON

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth meets with Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles at the Pentagon in February 2025 to discuss regional security.

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (R) meets with Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister Richard Marles (L) at the Pentagon in February. Australia has declined to say how it would respond to a potential war with China. (Getty Images )

Whether Japan allows the U.S. to center its wartime operations on its territory would be a critical question certain to come up in preparations for a wartime contingency. 

The U.S. and Japan have practiced moving forces down the Japanese Ryukyu island chain, the closest of which is only 80 miles off the coast of Taiwan. 

Advertisement

Colby’s push for defined allied roles comes on the heels of his initiation of a review of the AUKUS security pact, which aims to supply Australia with U.S.-built nuclear-powered submarines.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

The Pentagon recently defended Colby after reports emerged that he had temporarily halted military aid to Ukraine — an order quickly reversed by Trump.

Advertisement

Under the AUKUS agreement, Australia would purchase several Virginia-class submarines in the early 2030s, while a new class of submarines would be jointly developed by the U.S., U.K., and Australia. Production in Australia is expected to begin in the 2040s. However, the U.S. is already struggling to produce enough submarines for its own Navy.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Iranian crowdfunding campaign claims to raise $40M as reward for assassinating Trump

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

An Iranian movement called the «Blood Covenant» is claiming to have crowdfunded more than $40 million as a reward for assassinating President Donald Trump, according to the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI). 

Advertisement

A website for the movement contained a poster of Trump in crosshairs with an appeal to donate «in order to ‘help establish stable peace,’» the nonprofit reported. It added that the poster quotes a verse from the Quran that reads, «Strive with your wealth and your lives in the cause of Allah.» 

«This is a call to jihad, inviting believers to donate their money and sacrifice their lives,» MEMRI said. «The poster lends religious legitimacy to assassinating Trump.» 

The apparent threat comes weeks after the U.S. launched devastating airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities. A U.S. Secret Service official told Fox News «We operate in a heightened and very dynamic threat environment and the safety and security of the President and all of our protectees remains our highest priority. 

Advertisement

TRUMP TARGETED BY IRANIAN DEATH FATWAS AS WATCHDOG GROUP DEMANDS IMMEDIATE SANCTIONS RESPONSE 

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Donald Trump (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo)

«To preserve operational integrity, we cannot comment on specific protective intelligence matters. However, our teams work around the clock with international, federal, state, and local partners to ensure the highest levels of protection,» the official added.

Advertisement

MEMRI said «In Iran in recent days there has been an increase in explicit calls for assassinating Trump, from the Iranian regime’s religious establishment, due allegedly to a threat by Trump to assassinate Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei – even though Trump said he had actually prevented such a move.»

 «These calls are backed by fatwas issued in late June by Iranian grand ayatollahs. The fatwas stated that the punishment for Trump is the same as for a muhareb – that is, an enemy of Allah and Islam – and that is death, and the permitting of his blood,» it continued.

«Iranian regime officials, among them Assembly of Expert members who are close to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, senior clerics and lecturers at the Howza-e Ilmiyya seminaries, and the regime’s Friday preachers, are explicitly calling for Trump’s assassination,» MEMRI added. 

Advertisement

«The fact that these calls to assassinate Trump are coming from above and being echoed in the street and through all strata of society, including in the Iranian media, underlines the depth and uniformity of the regime’s institutional incitement,» it also said. «It reflects a broad religious and regime consensus strengthened by reiterated emphasis of the reward anyone carrying out the punishment against Trump can expect to receive – in addition to the $40.3 million, also Paradise and the status of a defender of Islam.» 

IRAN CLAIMS ITS PRESIDENT WAS INJURED IN ISRAELI AIRSTRIKE LAST MONTH 

Damage to Iran's Isfahan nuclear site

Satellite images showing Iran’s Isfahan nuclear facility on June 16, left, and Monday, June 23, 2025, right, following U.S. airstrikes. (Planet Labs PBC)

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies alleged that an Iranian national and former employee for the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting – which it described as «the regime’s main propaganda network» – is behind the creation of the «Blood Covenant» website. 

Advertisement

The State Department did not immediately respond Monday to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. 

Protest against US in Iran

A man waves a flag while standing on a sign representing the U.S. flag on the day of the funeral procession of Iranian military commanders, nuclear scientists and others killed in Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, on June 28, 2025.  (Majid Asgaripour/WANA/Reuters)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

A senior State Department official said the Trump administration is aware of the threats against the president, according to the Washington Free Beacon. 

Advertisement

Fox News’ Pat Ward contributed to this report.


Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias

Copyright © 2025 NDM - Noticias del Momento | #Noticias #Chimentos #Política #Fútbol #Economía #Sociedad