Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Trump’s tax hike proposal is ‘déjà vu’ of George H. W. Bush’s ‘read my lips’ moment, experts say

Published

on


Americans lambasted President George H. W. Bush for infamously vowing on stage at the 1988 Republican National Convention not to raise taxes on Americans, then supporting a tax hike as president two years later. 

History could repeat itself as President Donald Trump this week signaled his support for congressional Republicans raising taxes to accomplish the ambitious goals of his «big, beautiful bill,» according to experts.

Advertisement

«My opponent won’t rule out raising taxes, but I will. And the Congress will push me to raise taxes, and I’ll say no. And they’ll push and I’ll say no. And they’ll push again, and I’ll say to them: ‘Read my lips: no new taxes,’» then-Vice President Bush vowed at the 1988 convention, before raising taxes two years later with the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990. 

While acknowledging the political backlash his fellow Republican faced, Trump signaled in a Truth Social post on Friday his own willingness to raise taxes on Americans, following reports confirmed by Fox News Digital that the president is considering raising the tax rate on individuals making $2.5 million or more by 2.6%, from 37% to 39.6%.

TRUMP CONSIDERS TAX HIKE ON AMERICANS MAKING $2.5 MILLION OR MORE PER YEAR

Advertisement

Political experts compared President Donald Trump, right, to President George H. W. Bush after Trump signaled his support for a small tax hike.  (Pool/Getty Images)

«The problem with even a ‘TINY’ tax increase for the RICH, which I and all others would graciously accept in order to help the lower and middle income workers, is that the Radical Left Democrat Lunatics would go around screaming, ‘Read my lips,’ the fabled Quote by George Bush the Elder that is said to have cost him the Election. NO, Ross Perot cost him the Election! In any event, Republicans should probably not do it, but I’m OK if they do!!!» Trump said. 

WHITE HOUSE QUIETLY FLOATS MILLIONAIRE TAX HIKE PROPOSAL IN CONGRESS AS GOP LEADERS SIGNAL OPPOSITION

Advertisement

Ross Perot, the late billionaire Texas businessman and philanthropist, ran an independent campaign as a third-party candidate in the 1992 presidential election, winning an historic 19% of the popular vote.

As Trump suggested, the political fallout of raising taxes contributed to Bush losing re-election to President Bill Clinton in 1992. Democrats slammed Bush in campaign ads for walking back his word as conservative Republicans criticized the president for being out of step with the party’s traditional tax policies. 

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich led Republican criticism of Bush’s tax hike proposal, and Gingrich has urged Trump to stand down on raising taxes since rumors the administration was floating a small tax hike first swirled. 

Advertisement

TRUMP’S FIRST VICE PRESIDENT URGES HIS OLD BOSS AGAINST RAISING TAXES ON WEALTHY AMERICANS

Gingrich recently told Larry Kudlow on FOX Business that Trump is a Ronald Reagan Republican, not a Bush Republican, and raising taxes would be an «act of destruction.»

«It would absolutely shatter his coalition,» Gingrich said. «It would mean the entire conservative movement would rise in rebellion, and it would mean every small business in the country would start recalculating who they are going to lay off, if they are even going to stay in business. It would make no sense at all.»

Advertisement
House Speaker Mike Johnson

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is leading ongoing budget negotiations for Trump’s «big, beautiful bill.» (Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)

Negotiations are ongoing among House Republicans to finalize Trump’s «big, beautiful bill,» which is expected to include an extension of Trump’s 2017 tax cuts and fulfill campaign promises, including no tax on tips, overtime or Social Security. 

Republican politicians and pundits have joined Gingrich’s critique of Trump’s potential tax hike, arguing Trump is repeating the same mistakes as Bush. 

«[House] Speaker [Mike] Johnson and Republican members of Congress must have experienced collective déjà vu when President Trump urged Congress to raise taxes,» New England College President Wayne Lesperance, a veteran political scientist and political historian, told Fox News Digital.           

Advertisement

«Harkening back to the infamous ‘Read my lips’ pledge made by George H. W. Bush at the 1988 GOP Convention, today’s Republicans must be nervous at the president’s change on what is a sacrosanct issue for the party — tax cuts. Interestingly, George H. W. Bush’s decision to break his pledge was surrounded by notably different circumstances,» Lesperance added. 

George H.W. Bush

In this Feb. 11, 1991, file photo, President George H. W. Bush talks to reporters in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, D.C., after meeting with top military advisors to discuss the Persian Gulf War.  (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds, File)

But Lesperance reminded Republicans, who currently control the House and Senate, that Democrats could gain an edge in the 2026 midterms if tax hikes prove to be as unpopular among Republicans as they were in 1992. 

«Facing a Democratically controlled Congress, Bush reneged on his pledge as a compromise to reduce the deficit and pass the 1990 budget agreement. Bush’s decision to compromise on taxes is widely credited with costing him his bid for re-election. As Speaker Johnson and Republican members of Congress look ahead to midterm elections, there must be collective worry that President Trump’s shifting position on taxes will cost them at the polls,» Lesperance said. 

Advertisement

Longtime Republican consultant David Carney, a veteran of numerous GOP presidential campaigns, said the move by Bush «was probably the single most detrimental thing to his re-election.»

Donald Trump at NYC rally

Then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at Madison Square Garden in New York on Oct. 27, 2024. (Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images)

Carney, who served in the elder Bush’s White House and worked on his presidential campaigns, told Fox News «the deal he cut was excellent. He cut spending, balanced out the taxes.»

But Carney emphasized «all that’s inside baseball and the reality is it was a great opportunity for people from the right and the left to make hay out of it, and it was absolutely hurtful.»

Advertisement

However, fiscal conservatives remain optimistic that Trump won’t raise taxes, despite the president softening to the idea on social media on Friday morning. 

«President Trump campaigned on not raising taxes, and we are confident that’s exactly what he’ll do,» Club for Growth President David McIntosh told Fox News Digital. 

When reached for comment about the Bush comparison, the White House pointed to press secretary Karoline Leavitt’s comments during the White House briefing on Friday. 

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«The president wants tax cuts, the largest tax cuts in history,» Leavitt said. «He wants to extend his historic tax cuts from 2017, and he wants to see all the other tax priorities,» including no tax on tips, overtime or Social Security. 

«The president has said he himself personally would not mind paying a little bit more to help the poor and the middle class and the working class in this country. I think, frankly, that’s a very honorable position. But again, these negotiations are ongoing on Capitol Hill, and the president will weigh in when he feels necessary,» she added. 

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Elizabeth Elkind contributed to this report. 

Politics,Donald Trump,Taxes,Remembering George H. W. Bush

INTERNACIONAL

Where Iran’s ballistic missiles can reach — and how close they are to the US

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump warned that Iran is working to build missiles that could «soon reach the United States of America,» elevating concerns about a weapons program that already places U.S. forces across the Middle East within range.

Advertisement

Iran does not currently possess a missile capable of striking the U.S. homeland, officials say. But its existing ballistic missile arsenal can target major American military installations in the Gulf, and U.S. officials say the issue has emerged as a key sticking point in ongoing nuclear negotiations.

Here’s what Iran can hit now — and how close it is to reaching the U.S.

What Iran can hit right now

A map shows what is within range of ballistic missiles fired from Iran. (Fox News)

Advertisement

Iran is widely assessed by Western defense analysts to operate the largest ballistic missile force in the Middle East. Its arsenal consists primarily of short- and medium-range ballistic missiles with ranges of up to roughly 2,000 kilometers — about 1,200 miles.

That range places a broad network of U.S. military infrastructure across the Gulf within reach.

Among the installations inside that envelope:

Advertisement

IRAN SIGNALS NUCLEAR PROGRESS IN GENEVA AS TRUMP CALLS FOR FULL DISMANTLEMENT

  • Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, forward headquarters for U.S. Central Command.
  • Naval Support Activity Bahrain, home to the U.S. 5th Fleet.
  • Camp Arifjan in Kuwait, a major Army logistics and command hub.
  • Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait, used by U.S. Air Force units.
  • Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia.
  • Al Dhafra Air Base in the United Arab Emirates.
  • Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, which hosts U.S. aircraft.

U.S. forces have drawn down from some regional positions in recent months, including the transfer of Al Asad Air Base in Iraq back to Iraqi control earlier in 2026. But major Gulf installations remain within the range envelope of Iran’s current missile inventory.

Israel Iran Strikes

Israel’s air defense targets Iranian missiles in the sky of Tel Aviv in Israel, June 16, 2025. (MATAN GOLAN/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

Multiple U.S. officials told Fox News that staffing at the Navy’s 5th Fleet headquarters in Bahrain has been reduced to «mission critical» levels amid heightened tensions. A separate U.S. official disputed that characterization, saying no ordered departure of personnel or dependents has been issued.

At the same time, the U.S. has surged significant naval and air assets into and around the region in recent days. 

Advertisement

The USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group is operating in the Arabian Sea alongside multiple destroyers, while additional destroyers are positioned in the eastern Mediterranean, Red Sea and Persian Gulf. 

The USS Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group is also headed toward the region. U.S. Air Force fighter aircraft — including F-15s, F-16s, F-35s and A-10s — are based across Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, supported by aerial refueling tankers, early warning aircraft and surveillance platforms, according to a recent Fox News military briefing.

Iran has demonstrated its willingness to use ballistic missiles against U.S. targets before.

Advertisement

In January 2020, following the U.S. strike that killed Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Gen. Qassem Soleimani, Iran launched more than a dozen ballistic missiles at U.S. positions in Iraq. Dozens of American service members were later diagnosed with traumatic brain injuries.

That episode underscored the vulnerability of forward-deployed forces within reach of Iran’s missile arsenal.

 Can Iran reach Europe?

Most publicly known Iranian missile systems are assessed to have maximum ranges of around 2,000 kilometers. 

Advertisement

Depending on launch location, that could place parts of southeastern Europe — including Greece, Bulgaria and Romania — within potential reach. The U.S. has some 80,000 troops stationed across Europe, including in all three of these countries.

Iran missiles

Iran is widely assessed by Western defense analysts to operate the largest ballistic missile force in the Middle East. (Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Reaching deeper into Europe would require longer-range systems than Iran has publicly demonstrated as operational.

Can Iran hit the US?

IRAN NEARS CHINA ANTI-SHIP SUPERSONIC MISSILE DEAL AS US CARRIERS MASS IN REGION: REPORT

Advertisement

Iran does not currently field an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capable of striking the U.S. homeland.

To reach the U.S. East Coast, a missile would need a range of roughly 10,000 kilometers — far beyond Iran’s known operational capability.

However, U.S. intelligence agencies have warned that Iran’s space launch vehicle program could provide the technological foundation for a future long-range missile.

Advertisement

In a recent threat overview, the Defense Intelligence Agency stated that Iran «has space launch vehicles it could use to develop a militarily-viable ICBM by 2035 should Tehran decide to pursue the capability.»

That assessment places any potential Iranian intercontinental missile capability roughly a decade away — and contingent on a political decision by Tehran.

U.S. officials and defense analysts have pointed in particular to Iran’s recent space launches, including rockets such as the Zuljanah, which use solid-fuel propulsion. Solid-fuel motors can be stored and launched more quickly than liquid-fueled rockets — a feature that is also important for military ballistic missiles.

Advertisement

Space launch vehicles and long-range ballistic missiles rely on similar multi-stage rocket technology. Analysts say advances in Iran’s space program could shorten the pathway to an intercontinental-range missile if Tehran chose to adapt that technology for military use.

For now, however, Iran has not deployed an operational ICBM, and the U.S. homeland remains outside the reach of its current ballistic missile arsenal.

US missile defenses — capable but finite

The U.S. relies on layered missile defense systems — including Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), Patriot and ship-based interceptors — to protect forces and allies from ballistic missile threats across the Middle East.

Advertisement

These systems are technically capable, but interceptor inventories are finite.

During the June 2025 Iran-Israel missile exchange, U.S. forces reportedly fired more than 150 THAAD interceptors — roughly a quarter of the total the Pentagon had funded to date, according to defense analysts.

The economics also highlight the imbalance: open-source estimates suggest Iranian short-range ballistic missiles can cost in the low hundreds of thousands of dollars apiece, while advanced U.S. interceptors such as THAAD run roughly $12 million or more per missile.

Advertisement

Precise inventory levels are classified. But experts who track Pentagon procurement data warn that replenishing advanced interceptors can take years, meaning a prolonged, high-intensity missile exchange could strain stockpiles even if U.S. defenses remain effective.

Missile program complicates negotiations

The ballistic missile issue has also emerged as a key fault line in ongoing diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Iran’s refusal to negotiate limits on its ballistic missile program is «a big problem,» signaling that the administration views the arsenal as central to long-term regional security.

Advertisement

While current negotiations are focused primarily on Iran’s nuclear program and uranium enrichment activities, U.S. officials have argued that delivery systems — including ballistic missiles — cannot be separated from concerns about a potential nuclear weapon.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Iranian officials, however, have insisted their missile program is defensive in nature and not subject to negotiation as part of nuclear-focused talks.

Advertisement

As diplomacy continues, the strategic reality remains clear: Iran cannot currently strike the U.S. homeland with a ballistic missile. But U.S. forces across the Middle East remain within range of Tehran’s existing arsenal — and future capabilities remain a subject of intelligence concern.

Related Article

Iran announces test of new naval air defense missile in Strait of Hormuz as US military buildup continues

iran,conflicts defense,middle east,pentagon

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

La política exterior de Trump y algunas señales de lo que vendrá: ¿Resucitar el imperio?

Published

on


WASHINGTON — La política exterior del presidente Donald Trump ha variado drásticamente en todo el mundo, pero se ha mantenido consistente en su naturaleza agresiva y su dependencia del uso de la fuerza.

Ha capturado al líder de Venezuela mientras se apropia del petróleo del país y ataca embarcaciones civiles cercanas.

Advertisement

Ha sumido a Cuba en una crisis humanitaria mediante un bloqueo y se ha arrogado el derecho a controlar Canadá y Groenlandia.

Además, ha reunido la mayor fuerza militar estadounidense en Oriente Medio desde la invasión de Irak en 2003, amenazando con una nueva guerra contra Irán tras los ataques de junio.

Trump llama a su política «Estados Unidos Primero«, un enfoque declarado en los intereses estadounidenses, tal como él los define.

Advertisement

Pero no se trata de aislacionismo ni de un repliegue del mundo, como han argumentado algunos analistas.

Tampoco se ha manifestado todavía en un impulso para crear «esferas de influencia«, donde la administración se contentaría con dominar únicamente el hemisferio occidental y dejar otras regiones en manos de potencias rivales.

Desde una perspectiva, es una resurrección de la misión del imperio —la adquisición de territorios y recursos de pueblos soberanos— que impulsó a las potencias europeas y a otras potencias bien armadas hasta el siglo XX.

Advertisement

También es una aceptación, e incluso una celebración, de las historias imperiales occidentales.

En su discurso inaugural del año pasado, Trump elogió al presidente William McKinley, quien transformó a Estados Unidos en un imperio de ultramar durante la Guerra Hispano-estadounidense al adquirir Filipinas, Guam y Puerto Rico.

La forma de primacía estadounidense de Trump fue articulada más claramente por el Secretario de Estado Marco Rubio este mes en un discurso en la Conferencia de Seguridad de Munich.

Advertisement

“Durante cinco siglos, antes del final de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, Occidente había estado expandiéndose: sus misioneros, sus peregrinos, sus soldados, sus exploradores salían de sus costas para cruzar océanos, colonizar nuevos continentes y construir vastos imperios que se extendían por todo el mundo”, dijo Rubio a una audiencia compuesta principalmente por funcionarios europeos.

Luego, después de 1945, cuando terminó la Segunda Guerra Mundial y Europa estaba en ruinas, “Occidente” se estaba “contrayendo”, dijo Rubio.

Condenó los movimientos independentistas anticoloniales, vinculándolos con la ideología comunista y culpándolos de erosionar el poder occidental.

Advertisement

«Los grandes imperios occidentales habían entrado en una decadencia terminal, acelerada por revoluciones comunistas ateas y levantamientos anticoloniales que transformarían el mundo y extenderían la hoz y el martillo rojos por vastas franjas del mapa», afirmó.

Aliados

Rubio luego dijo que la administración Trump no quería aliados “encadenados por la culpa y la vergüenza”, usando el mismo lenguaje que Alternativa para Alemania, o AfD, el partido de extrema derecha alemán.

Advertisement

“Queremos aliados que estén orgullosos de su cultura y de su herencia, que entiendan que somos herederos de la misma gran y noble civilización y que, junto con nosotros, estén dispuestos y sean capaces de defenderla”, dijo.

Más adelante en el discurso, advirtió sobre la “aliminación de la civilización”.

Rubio recibió una ovación de pie.

Advertisement

Su discurso, aunque rebosante de duras críticas a las naciones europeas, evocó la historia compartida de Estados Unidos y Europa.

Para algunos historiadores y conservadores estadounidenses, el discurso también encapsuló ideas sobre el liberalismo y el declive de Occidente expresadas décadas antes por los escritores de derecha James Burnham y Pat Buchanan.

Mientras Trump impulsa acciones belicosas (amenaza con una guerra contra Irán casi a diario y volvió a hablar de Groenlandia el fin de semana pasado), algunos analistas han visto el discurso de Rubio como una señal de lo que vendrá.

Advertisement

Futuro

“Rubio reflejó con precisión la situación actual de la política exterior de Trump”, afirmó Stephen Wertheim, historiador del poder estadounidense en el Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

“A pesar del temor generalizado de que Trump pudiera retirarse del mundo, está trabajando para revitalizar el dominio militar estadounidense en todos los ámbitos. Es el globalismo de América Primero. Lejos de abandonar las alianzas, Trump las está utilizando como armas para la coerción”.

Advertisement

La celebración del imperio habría sido normal en Europa a principios del siglo XX, “pero está fuera de lugar en un mundo que se ha descolonizado y democratizado”, dijo Wertheim.

Nader Hashemi, un estudioso de la política de Medio Oriente en la Universidad de Georgetown, dijo que a medida que Trump y Rubio impulsan sus políticas imperialistas, “las consecuencias para las relaciones internacionales serán enormes, especialmente en el Sur Global, donde la identidad política de la mayoría de los estados-nación se formó en el contexto de una lucha de descolonización contra el imperialismo occidental”.

“En el mundo árabe-islámico”, añadió, “las fuerzas extremistas explotarán este desarrollo para atraer nuevos reclutas”.

Advertisement

Y Rusia y China podrían beneficiarse, tras décadas de intentar sumar a otros países a su bando criticando lo que han llamado imperialismo estadounidense.

El Departamento de Estado no respondió a un correo electrónico con preguntas.

Recuerdos

Advertisement

Hablando de su tierra natal, Rubio se deshizo en elogios sobre los colonialistas estadounidenses y europeos que trabajaban codo a codo para reclamar territorio:

“los granjeros y artesanos alemanes que transformaron llanuras vacías en una potencia agrícola mundial” en el Medio Oeste, y “los comerciantes de pieles y exploradores franceses cuyos nombres, por cierto, todavía adornan los carteles de las calles y los nombres de los pueblos de todo el valle del Mississippi”.

Rubio, hijo de inmigrantes cubanos, también tenía antepasados ​​de Italia y España.

Advertisement

Las «llanuras vacías» son, por supuesto, un mito:

los nativos americanos vivieron allí durante milenios antes de ser asesinados y subyugados por los colonos.

Rubio no mencionó ni una sola vez los millones de personas asesinadas, torturadas y encarceladas en las guerras libradas en todo el mundo en nombre del imperio.

Advertisement

Tampoco hizo alusión a la institución imperial de la esclavitud ni al papel de los africanos esclavizados en la construcción de Estados Unidos, desde la época colonial hasta la Guerra de Secesión.

También evitó hablar de los legados vivos del imperio en Occidente, incluyendo a los numerosos inmigrantes de antiguas naciones colonizadas y descendientes de esclavos que han forjado sus países.

Algunos historiadores dijeron que Rubio fue quizás el único alto funcionario estadounidense de las últimas décadas que celebró el imperio de una manera tan explícita.

Advertisement

“Celebrar a Estados Unidos como heredero de la civilización occidental no es nada nuevo, pero al menos desde Franklin D. Roosevelt, presidentes y diplomáticos hablan de Estados Unidos como enemigo del imperio y del imperialismo”, dijo John Delury, un historiador que ha escrito sobre las políticas exteriores de Estados Unidos y del este asiático.

“Los libros de texto se han actualizado para reconocer cómo los ‘exploradores’ esclavizaron a las personas como mano de obra, los ‘misioneros’ borraron las culturas y religiones indígenas, y los ‘pioneros’ desposeyeron a los pueblos nativos de sus hogares y medios de vida”, agregó.

Constanze Stelzenmüller, directora del Centro sobre Estados Unidos y Europa de la Brookings Institution, afirmó que el panegírico al imperio impactó especialmente a los funcionarios y analistas presentes en la conferencia de Múnich, provenientes de antiguas naciones colonizadas.

Advertisement

«Decían: ‘Esto es asombroso’», afirmó.

Al mismo tiempo, añadió, algunos funcionarios adoptaron la actitud de:

«Bueno, Estados Unidos está volviendo a ser como antes, y al menos están siendo honestos».

Advertisement

Stelzenmüller afirmó que celebrar el imperio no ha sido central en el discurso sobre la extrema derecha europea, a la que suelen apelar los principales asesores de Trump.

Por lo tanto, añadió que resultaba desconcertante que Rubio usara esas líneas.

El objetivo podría haber sido normalizar la idea del poder y la expansión imparables de Estados Unidos, incluso sobre Groenlandia, afirmó.

Advertisement

«Creo que este lenguaje puede ser parte de un intento de condicionar a los europeos a la aceptación, a que sean impotentes para resistir cualquier diseño expansionista que pueda tener la administración», argumentó Stelzenmüller.

Reacción

Michael Kimmage, director del Instituto Kennan, un centro de investigación sobre Eurasia, dijo que Rubio estaba activando una contratradición de política exterior que surgió en la derecha estadounidense durante las décadas de 1950 y 1960.

Advertisement

Las ideas fueron expresadas más vívidamente por National Review y uno de sus columnistas, Burnham, quien escribió un libro, “El suicidio de Occidente”, que era una crítica del liberalismo moderno y un “lamento por la pérdida del imperio”, como lo expresó Kimmage.

La evocación de Rubio de un Oeste “en contracción” se hizo eco de las palabras de Burnham.

“Identificó la inmigración y la pérdida de confianza en la civilización como los problemas centrales de un Occidente posimperial”, dijo Kimmage.

Advertisement

“Rubio claramente está replanteando estas ideas. Las ideas en sí no son nuevas. Lo novedoso es que ahora se promueven desde el Departamento de Estado y la Casa Blanca, como no se había hecho en las últimas siete décadas”.

Andrew Day, escritor de The American Conservative, que defiende el no intervencionismo, dijo que pensaba que Rubio estaba subrayando la política de la administración Trump de reforzar el orgullo por la civilización occidental (un proyecto admirable con una ejecución pobre, en su opinión) en lugar de respaldar el imperio.

“Sinceramente, dudo que Rubio promoviera el regreso al imperialismo y al colonialismo”, dijo.

Advertisement

“Más bien, señalaba cierto malestar cultural y falta de confianza en sí mismos que padecen los occidentales”.

Pero Day señaló que los moderadores conservadores se mantenían escépticos respecto a Rubio, a quien consideran un defensor radical de la hegemonía global estadounidense.

El secretario de Estado ha impulsado recientemente acciones contra Venezuela, Cuba e Irán.

Advertisement

“Creían que Rubio estaba pintando un rostro civilizatorio con un cerdo neoconservador, por así decirlo”, dijo Day.

Ese grupo también desconfía de Europa, añadió, y cree que el «marco ‘civilizatorio occidental’ de la administración es grandioso e internacionalista y, por lo tanto, incompatible con un enfoque nítido en los intereses nacionales de Estados Unidos».

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Newsom staffer who told California reporter to ‘f— off’ is raking in massive taxpayer-funded salary

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Isaac «Izzy» Gardon, a longtime Gavin Newsom staffer who made headlines earlier this week for telling a national reporter to «f— off» after she pressed him on the California governor’s reported dyslexia diagnosis, is raking in a hefty six-figure salary, a Fox News Digital review found.

Advertisement

While Newsom’s dyslexia diagnosis has been public for decades, interest in the matter was amplified amid the California governor’s book tour he launched this month. During one of his first stops on the tour, in Atlanta, Newsom was asked about his dyslexia in conversation with Democratic Mayor of Atlanta Andre Dickens, who asked what he hoped readers would take away from the discussion about his diagnosis in the governor’s new book. 

«I’m like you. I’m no better than you. You know, I’m a 960 SAT guy,» Newsom said in response, garnering criticism online that he was pandering to the Black community.   

Amid the rebukes from MAGA world and Republicans, Real Clear Politics (RCP) national correspondent Susan Crabtree reached out to Gardon for verification on his childhood disability diagnosis. In response, Gardon told her to «respectfully, f— off.» 

Advertisement

Democratic Party Governor of California, Gavin Newsom, holds up his new memoir during a book tour event in South Carolina earlier this month. (Peter Zay/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The testy response led to further criticism targeting Newsom’s office and Gardon, including from RCP’s Carl Cannon, who questioned why people who are offended so deeply by Trump «consistently imitate his worst behavior.» Newsom’s press office has been known to meet the White House’s pointed and often hostile social media posts targeting Democrats, which frequently include AI generated images, with similarly hostile social media posts targeting Trump and Republicans. 

When reached for comment on this story, Gardon told Fox News Digital that «Susan is not a journalist.»  

Advertisement

«She’s a MAGA blogger who writes about conspiracy theories,» Gardon added. 

Transparent California, a statewide public pay and pension database, revealed that Gardon is being paid quite handsomely to be one of Newsom’s most ardent defenders online. Gardon has risen in stature from an administrative assistant making around $30,000 per year in 2019, to earning $212,154.02 in 2024 as a senior assistant and a in Newsom’s office.

NEWSOM BLASTED BY CA GOP CHAIR OVER VIRAL CLIP LABELED ‘RACIST’ BY CRITICS: ‘HE SHOULD BE EMBARRASSED’

Advertisement
Gavin NEwsom clapping at event in South Carolina for his book

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) seen laughing at an event earlier this month hosted by the South Carolina Democratic Party.  (Sean Rayford/Getty Images)

Gardon’s «regular pay» in 2024 was $152,091.05. That was also supplemented by nearly $57,000 in benefits and another $3,141.16 in «other pay,» according to the database, leading to a combined annual payment of $212,154.02. However, his current pay, which does not appear to be publicly available online, is likely to be higher.

Following news of Gardon’s response to Crabtree’s follow-up, a senior reporter for the California Post also shared an email from Gardon in response to one of his media inquiries. 

In Gardon’s response, he referred to the New York Post as the «New York Comic Book.» Then, when Koehn followed up, indicating the San Francisco Chronicle was covering the same story, Gardon replied, «I’d put that outlet in the same bucket,» according to Koehn, who posted screenshots of the pair’s back-and-forth on X.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

A copy of Gov. Gavin Newsom's new memoir

A man is seen holding a copy of California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s new memoir titled «Young Man In A Hurry.» (Sean Rayford/Getty Images)

While some top Newsom staffers have praised Gardon’s style, including his boss and senior advisor of communications, Bob Salladay, who told Politico that «Izzy’s creativity and imagination is part of what the governor is doing.» Some Democratic operatives have vocally been critical about his communication style, including Garry Tan, a prolific Democratic donor and CEO of Y Combinator

«Most unprofessional person to ever work in politics,» Tan posted on X. «Izzy Gardon brings shame to the Newsom campaign.»

Advertisement

Gardon also came under fire earlier this month when he referred to rapper and MAGA activist Nicki Minaj as a «stupid hoe» on X. He defended his social media post by pointing to her 2012 song called, «Stupid Hoe.»

Related Article

Tommy Pham speaks out against Gavin Newsom over controversial SAT score comments

gavin newsom,politics,california,elections state and local,governors

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias