Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Warren demands SEC investigate Trump for insider trading, accuses him of unleashing ‘chaos’ with tariffs

Published

on


Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren defended her calls for the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate President Donald Trump over accusations of market manipulation and insider trading, saying such an investigation is «entirely appropriate.»

«That’s what investigations are for. And it’s entirely appropriate to have an investigation to make sure that Donald Trump, Donald Trump’s family, Donald Trump’s inner circle didn’t get advance information and trade on that information,» Warren told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Sunday during an appearance on «State of the Union.» 

Advertisement

Warren, alongside a handful of other Senate Democrats such as Oregon’s Ron Wyden and New York’s Chuck Schumer, wrote a letter to the SEC chief on Friday calling for an investigation into alleged market manipulation following Trump’s reciprocal tariff announcement and subsequent 90-day pause to the customized tariffs he leveled on foreign nations. 

«We urge the SEC to investigate whether the tariff announcements, which caused the market crash and subsequent partial recovery, enriched administration insiders and friends at the expense of the American public and whether any insiders, including the President’s family, had prior knowledge of the tariff pause that they abused to make stock trades ahead of the President’s announcement,» the Senate Democrats wrote in their letter to SEC Chair Paul Atkins on Friday. 

WH SLAMS DEMS’ ‘PARTISAN GAMES’ AFTER TRUMP-FOE SCHIFF CALLS FOR INSIDER TRADING INVESTIGATION OVER TARIFFS

Advertisement

President Donald Trump and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Getty Images)

The White House slammed calls for investigations into market manipulation last week in comments provided to Fox Digital that accused Democrats of playing «partisan games.» 

NANCY GOT ‘FILTHY RICH,’ BUT NOW DEMS WANT TO LOOK AT STOCK MANIPULATION?: JESSE WATTERS

Advertisement

«It is the responsibility of the President of the United States to reassure the markets and Americans about their economic security in the face of nonstop media fearmongering. Democrats railed against China’s cheating for decades, and now they’re playing partisan games instead of celebrating President Trump’s decisive action yesterday to finally corner China,» White House spokesman Kush Desai said in comment to Fox Digital when asked about Democrats claiming Trump manipulated the market. 

Trump tariffs

A New York Times columnist grilled the Democratic Party for not mounting an aggressive enough attack on President Trump’s tariff policy. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)

When asked on Sunday if Warren had actually seen evidence of alleged insider trading, she responded: «Well, there are people who have looked at what happened to purchases and to calls just before he made that announcement that caused the stock market to skyrocket.»

She continued on Sunday that members of Congress should also be subject to a rule barring them from trading individual stocks. 

Advertisement

«This is how the stock market works in order to make sure on a consistent basis that nobody’s trading on inside information. And, by the way, Jake, the same thing should apply to Congress. And that is, we should have a rule that no one in Congress can… trade in any individual stocks, no senator, no representative. I have had that bill for a long time. It’s got a lot of support,» she told Tapper. 

DONALD TRUMP’S ALLIES, SUPPORTERS AND DONORS, LED BY ELON MUSK, PUSH TO END TARIFF WAR

Sens. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., wrote a letter on Thursday to White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, as well as Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, also calling for an investigation into potential insider trading. 

Advertisement
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren

Sen. Elizabeth Warren asks questions during a Senate Finance Committee hearing on March 16, 2023, on Capitol Hill. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

Trump, ahead of pausing the reciprocal tariffs on Wednesday of last week, posted to Truth Social, «BE COOL! Everything is going to work out well. The USA will be bigger and better than ever before!» and «THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!! DJT.» The president had previously said he would not pause tariffs but was open to negotiating with other nations. 

Trump paused only the higher, customized tariffs he placed on nations that historically installed trade barriers on U.S. goods, with nations across the world instead facing a lower 10% tariff on goods, as the Trump administration and world leaders hash out negotiations for the reciprocal tariffs. 

China, however, was not part of the tariff pause and was instead hit with a higher 125% tariff after retaliating with its own additional tariffs against the U.S.

Advertisement

Warren continued in her remarks that tariffs can «be an important tool in the toolbox when used in targeted ways,» but accused Trump of spreading «chaos» through the implementations of his tariff plans.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

«Right now, what we have got is chaos and corruption. Donald Trump has imposed a tariff on everyone everywhere, on all products. That’s the 10% tariff. Of course, it was much higher earlier in the week, and now in this trade war with China that basically tries to shut down all trade,» she said. 

Advertisement

Donald Trump,Elizabeth Warren,Economy

INTERNACIONAL

Trump says Harvard should lose its tax exempt status, be treated as ‘political entity’ amid funding dispute

Published

on


President Donald Trump suggested Tuesday that Harvard University should lose its tax-exempt status and be considered a «political entity,» a day after his administration pulled $2.2 billion in funding from the Ivy League school. 

«Perhaps Harvard should lose its Tax Exempt Status and be Taxed as a Political Entity if it keeps pushing political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting ‘Sickness?’» Trump wrote on TRUTH Social. 

Advertisement

«Remember, Tax Exempt Status is totally contingent on acting in the PUBLIC INTEREST!» the president added. 

TRUMP ADMIN SLASHES OVER $2.2B IN FUNDING TO HARVARD AFTER SCHOOL DEFIES DEMANDS

Protesters gather outside Harvard University to show their disapproval of actions taken under the Trump administration on April 1, 2025. (Brett Phelps/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

Advertisement

The Trump administration on Monday said it was freezing more than $2.2 billion in grants and $60 million in contracts to Harvard University after the institution refused to comply with a set of terms set forth by the Department of Education, Department of Health and Human Services and the General Services Administration last week. 

Framed as «an expanding list of demands» by Harvard’s leadership, the administration asked the university to make changes to adhere to «merit-based» hiring and admissions practices and reform its recruitment of international students to «prevent admitting students hostile to the American values and institutions inscribed in the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence, including students supportive of terrorism or anti-Semitism.» 

Other requested reforms included ensuring «viewpoint diversity in admissions and hiring,» changing programs with «egregious records of antisemitism or other bias,» and discontinuing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies and initiatives. 

Advertisement

In an April 11 letter to Harvard leadership, Trump administration officials said that U.S. government «investment is not entitlement» and «depends on Harvard upholding federal civil rights laws, and it only makes sense if Harvard fosters the kind of environment that produces intellectual creativity and scholarly rigor, both of which are antithetical to ideological capture.» 

Trump speaks during Cabinet meeting

President Donald Trump speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on April 10, 2025, in Washington, D.C.  (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

In a statement on Monday, Harvard University President Alan Garber said the terms of agreement make «clear that the intention is not to work with us to address antisemitism in a cooperative and constructive manner.» 

HARVARD WON’T COMPLY WITH TRUMP ADMIN’S DEMANDS AMID THREATS OF CUTTING FEDERAL FUNDING

Advertisement

«Although some of the demands outlined by the government are aimed at combating antisemitism, the majority represent direct governmental regulation of the intellectual conditions at Harvard,» Garber wrote. 

He argued the terms required an «audit» of the student body, faculty and staff «viewpoints» and to reduce the power of certain students, faculty, and administrators «targeted because of their ideological views.» 

Anti-Israel protest at Harvard

Protesters gather outside Harvard University on April 1, 2025.  (Brett Phelps/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

«No government – regardless of which party is in power – should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue,» Garber wrote. 

Advertisement

Harvard’s response was praised by Democrats, including former President Barack Obama and Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey, while conservatives mocked the Ivy League school’s outrage given its $53.2 billion endowment. 

«There is another way: Refuse taxpayer money,» Hillsdale College, a private Christian institution in Michigan, posted on X. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«Time to defund,» Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, wrote on X. «And tax that $50 billion endowment.» 

Richard Grenell, a longtime Trump ally who served in multiple administration roles, had a message to Harvard: «Don’t ask for taxpayer money if you don’t want taxpayer strings.» 

«You’ve ruined my degree with your far left activism,» Grenell wrote. «As a Harvard graduate, I support the Federal government enforcing laws that you violate.»

Advertisement

US Education,Donald Trump,Trump’s First 100 Days,Antisemitism Exposed,College

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump quiere encarcelar a estadounidenses en El Salvador; eso podría ser ilegal

Published

on


El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, reiteró el lunes que le gustaría enviar a prisión en El Salvador a los ciudadanos estadounidenses que cometan delitos violentos, y le dijo al mandatario salvadoreño, Nayib Bukele, que quizá tenga «que construir cinco lugares más» para albergar a más reclusos.

El gobierno de Trump ya ha deportado migrantes a la notoria prisión CECOT de El Salvador, la cual es conocida por sus duras condiciones. Trump también ha dicho que su gobierno está tratando de encontrar formas «legales» de enviar allá a ciudadanos estadounidenses.

Advertisement

Video

Donald Trump recibió a Nayib Bukele en la Casa Blanca

Trump insistió el lunes en que sólo serían «personas violentas», insinuando que serían aquellos ya condenados por delitos en Estados Unidos, aunque también lo ha planteado como un castigo para quienes ataquen concesionarios de Tesla para protestar contra el gobierno y su patrocinador, el multimillonario Elon Musk. Sin embargo, si el gobierno enviara a cualquier ciudadano nacido en el país a una prisión en el extranjero muy probablemente violaría la Constitución de Estados Unidos. De hecho, incluso violaría una cláusula de una ley que Trump promulgó durante su primer mandato.

¿Una medida inconstitucional?

Advertisement

A continuación, una mirada a la noción de enviar a ciudadanos estadounidenses a prisión en el extranjero, por qué probablemente no es legal y algunos posibles vacíos legales.

Si es legal hacerlo con extranjeros, ¿por qué no con estadounidenses? Los extranjeros pueden ser deportados de Estados Unidos, mientras que los ciudadanos no. La deportación está cubierta por la ley de inmigración, que no se aplica a los ciudadanos estadounidenses. Parte de ser ciudadano de Estados Unidos significa que no se puede ser enviado forzosamente a otro país.

Los inmigrantes pueden ser removidos del país

Advertisement

El Salvador está recibiendo tanto a sus propios ciudadanos que Estados Unidos está enviando como a aquellos de Venezuela y potencialmente otros países que no acepten a sus propios ciudadanos de regreso. Los venezolanos enviados allá el mes pasado no tuvieron oportunidad de responder a las pruebas en su contra ni de comparecer ante un juez.

Ese es el acuerdo que el gobierno de Trump firmó con Bukele. Estados Unidos ha enviado personas a El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panamá y otros lugares aun cuando no son ciudadanos de esos países. Pero, bajo acuerdos internacionales, las personas no pueden ser enviadas a países donde es probable que sean perseguidas o torturadas.

Video

Nuevos deportados de Estados Unidos llegan a la mega cárcel de Bukele

Advertisement

¿Por qué el gobierno de EE.UU. quiere enviar personas a El Salvador? Bukele se autodenomina «el dictador más cool del mundo» y ha restringido los derechos humanos durante su gobierno. También ha convertido a El Salvador de uno de los países más violentos del mundo en uno bastante seguro. Trump ha acogido ese ejemplo, incluso durante la visita al Despacho Oval el lunes.

Enviar inmigrantes de países como Venezuela a El Salvador envía un mensaje a los posibles migrantes en otros lugares sobre los riesgos de intentar llegar a —o quedarse en— Estados Unidos.

Hay un segundo beneficio para el gobierno estadounidense: las personas enviadas a El Salvador están fuera de la jurisdicción de los tribunales de Estados Unidos. Los jueces, argumenta el gobierno de Trump, no pueden ordenar que alguien enviado a El Salvador sea liberado o devuelto a Estados Unidos porque el gobierno de Estados Unidos ya no tiene control sobre ellos.

Advertisement

Es un posible vacío legal que hizo que la jueza Sonia Sotomayor emitiera una advertencia en su opinión en un fallo de 9-0 de la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos de que el gobierno no podía enviar presuntos miembros de pandillas venezolanas a El Salvador sin una audiencia judicial, incluso después de que Trump invocara una ley del siglo XVIII utilizada por última vez durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial para reclamar poderes de guerra.

«La implicación de la posición del Gobierno es que no sólo los no ciudadanos, sino también los ciudadanos de Estados Unidos, podrían ser sacados de las calles, forzados a subir a aviones y confinados en prisiones extranjeras sin oportunidad de desagravio», advirtió Sotomayor. La magistrada escribió un disenso en el caso del juez federal que inicialmente había prohibido al gobierno cualquier deportación y había ordenado que los aviones en ruta a El Salvador dieran la vuelta, una orden que el gobierno aparentemente no acató.

Trump y Buekele, en la Casa Blanca. Foto: Bloomberg

Un segundo caso pone de relieve los riesgos de enviar personas a El Salvador. El gobierno estadounidense admite que envió erróneamente a un hombre de Maryland —Kilmar Ábrego García—, a El Salvador. Abrego García, de origen salvadoreño y quien no ha sido acusado de delito alguno, tenía una orden contra la deportación, pero fue enviado al CECOT de todos modos. El lunes, Bukele y Trump se burlaron de la idea de enviarlo de vuelta, a pesar de que la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos ordenó al gobierno «facilitar» su regreso.

Advertisement

Entonces, ¿EE.UU. puede enviar estadounidenses a El Salvador? Nada como esto ha sido contemplado en la historia del país, pero parece poco probable. Hay otras barreras legales además del hecho de que Estados Unidos no puede deportar a ciudadanos estadounidenses.

Estados Unidos tiene tratados de extradición con varios países a donde enviaría a un ciudadano acusado de un delito en ese país para enfrentar juicio allí. Esa parece ser la única forma existente en que un ciudadano estadounidense puede ser removido forzosamente del país bajo la ley actual.

La Constitución también prohíbe «castigos crueles e inusuales», y uno de los argumentos con lo que se promociona el CECOT es que las condiciones allí son mucho más duras que en las prisiones de Estados Unidos. Como se señaló anteriormente, los tribunales federales no tienen jurisdicción allí, y eso puede privar a las personas enviadas allí de la garantía constitucional del debido proceso legal.

Advertisement

«Es ilegal expatriar a ciudadanos estadounidenses por un delito», escribió Lauren-Brooke Eisen, del Centro Brennan para la Justicia Social, en Nueva York.

La ley del Primer Paso

Señaló que incluso si el gobierno intenta transferir prisioneros federales allí, argumentando que ya están encarcelados, podría violar la Ley del Primer Paso que Trump mismo promovió y firmó en 2018.

Advertisement
Trump habla durante su encuentro con Bukele en la Casa Blanca. Foto: BloombergTrump habla durante su encuentro con Bukele en la Casa Blanca. Foto: Bloomberg

La disposición requiere que el gobierno aloje a los reclusos federales lo más cerca posible de sus hogares para que sus familias puedan visitarlos, e incluso transfiera a cualquier persona alojada a más de 800 kilómetros (500 millas) de su hogar a una instalación más cercana.

¿Un último vacío legal?

Hay un posible vacío legal que el gobierno podría usar para enviar a un pequeño grupo de ciudadanos estadounidenses a El Salvador. Puede intentar despojar de la ciudadanía a las personas que la obtuvieron después de inmigrar a Estados Unidos.

Las personas que se convirtieron en ciudadanos estadounidenses después del nacimiento pueden perder ese estatus por ciertos delitos, como financiar organizaciones terroristas o mentir en formularios de naturalización. Entonces se convertirían en residentes permanentes y potencialmente serían elegibles para la deportación si son condenados por otros delitos graves.

Advertisement

Ese es un grupo pequeño, aunque real, de personas. Quizás lo más significativo de esto es que requeriría la pérdida de la ciudadanía primero. En otras palabras, todavía probablemente no hay una forma legal de forzar a un ciudadano a salir del país. Pero algunos podrían terminar en problemas legales de todos modos.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Top Hamas terror leader killed in ‘precise strike’ by Israel: IDF

Published

on


The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) said it has killed a top Hamas leader responsible for arming terrorists with weapons used to carry out attacks against Israeli civilians and IDF troops. 

Muhammad al-‘Ajlah, the commander of Hamas’ Shejaiya battalion, was taken out in a «precise strike» on Sunday, the IDF said Tuesday.

Advertisement

The Shejaiya battalion is a military unit within Hamas’s armed wing that operates primarily in the Shejaiya neighborhood of Gaza City, which has historically been a stronghold for Hamas and a focal point of intense fighting during Israeli military operations.

Muhammad al-‘Ajlah, the commander of Hamas’ Shejaiya battalion, has been killed, the IDF says.

Muhammad al-‘Ajlah, the commander of Hamas’ Shejaiya battalion, taken out in a «precise strike» on Sunday, the IDF said Tuesday. (IDF)

WITH TRUMP’S BACKING ISRAEL PUSHES DEEPER INTO GAZA AS PRESSURE BUILDS FOR HOSTAGE DEAL

Al-‘Ajlah is the fifth commander of the Shejaiya battalion to be eliminated since the beginning of the war and the third since the start of the renewed operations in Gaza, the IDF said. 

Advertisement

«Muhammad al-‘Ajlah served as the commander of a combat support company in the Shejaiya battalion throughout the war and was eliminated in a precise strike on Sunday night,» the IDF said in a statement Tuesday.

«Prior to the strike, numerous steps were taken to mitigate the risk of harming civilians, including issuing advanced warnings to civilians, precise munitions, and aerial surveillance.»

Top Hamas leaders killed by Israel

The top Hamas leaders killed by Israel during the war. (IDF)

ISRAEL LAUNCHES NEW GROUND OPERATION IN GAZA

Advertisement

The Shejaiya battalion has been known to use urban guerrilla warfare, tunnels, IEDs and rocket launches as part of its operations, according to the IDF and reports.  

In October, Hamas terror chief Yahya Sinwar was killed during an Israeli military operation in the Gaza Strip, with chilling video capturing his final moments. 

Hamas’ top military commander, Mohammad Deif, was killed during a strike in July 2024. Deif initiated, planned and executed the October 7th terror attacks along with Sinwar, according to the IDF.

Advertisement

The killing of al-‘Ajlah on Sunday comes amid a resumption of the war on March 18 following a two-month ceasefire. 

The latest round of talks on Monday in Cairo to restore the ceasefire and free Israeli hostages ended with no apparent breakthrough, Palestinian and Egyptian sources said.

Hamas releases Israeli hostages

Emaciated Israeli hostages, from left to the right, Ohad Ben Ami, Eli Sharabi and Or Levy, who were held hostage by Hamas in Gaza since Oct. 7, 2023, are taken by terrorists to a stage before being handed over to the Red Cross in Deir al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip on Feb. 8, 2025.  (AP/Abdel Kareem Hana)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Hamas insists Israel commit to ending the war and pull out its forces from the Gaza Strip as agreed in the three-phase ceasefire accord that went into effect in late January.

Israel has said it will not end the war unless Hamas is eliminated and returns the remaining hostages held in Gaza.

Israel says that there are still 59 hostages in captivity, of whom Israel believes 35 are dead. Thirty-three hostages were released during the latest ceasefire; 251 were initially captured during the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks. 

Advertisement

Reuters contributed to this report. 


Advertisement
Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias

Copyright © 2025 NDM - Noticias del Momento | #Noticias #Chimentos #Política #Fútbol #Economía #Sociedad