Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Where are they now? Hunter Biden’s ex-business partners praise Trump, MAGA following Biden departure

Published

on


Hunter Biden’s former business partners are no longer under the same scrutiny now that investigations into whether the former president’s son used his family name for financial gain are over. 

Devon Archer and Jason Galanis, who both collaborated with Biden on various business ventures between 2012 and 2015, received pardons and commutations, respectively, from President Donald Trump after he took office. 

Advertisement

Archer, who has worked over the years to gain favor with Trump’s world, signaled he would be interested in working for the Trump administration were a position offered to him, according to the New York Times. «I’m full MAGA now,» he told the Times. «They’re more my people.»

HUNTER BIDEN’S EX-BUSINESS PARTNER REVEALS CONVERSATION WITH TRUMP THAT REPORTEDLY INCLUDES A PARDON

Archer was reportedly given the cold-shoulder by the Biden family during President Joe Biden’s tenure in the Oval Office, and as he protested his innocence amid Republicans’ probe into the Biden family, Archer quietly made inroads with the Trump administration.

Advertisement

Devon Archer, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, was provided a full and unconditional pardon by President Donald Trump. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

While Archer awaits a potential job in the Trump administration, he is reportedly working on a book and documentary chronicling his experiences. Archer is also reportedly working on a business project in the crypto industry as well. 

As a result of their pardons, both Archer and Galanis did not have to serve prison sentences handed down to them in relation to defrauding investors and a Native American tribal entity of tens of millions of dollars through a company for which Hunter Biden was listed as the vice chairman. 

Advertisement

In an interview on Fox News’ «Hannity» this month, Galanis thanked President Trump and lauded Republicans, such as Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, for bringing «the proof» to light about «the Biden crime family.» 

JONATHAN TURLEY: BIDEN DOJ BEHIND EVEN THE TIMES IN PURSUING ALLEGED HUNTER CORRUPTION

Galanis said during the interview that his «legitimate» businesses became «illegitimate» after they were aligned with the president’s son. «100% of it was influence peddling,» Galanis said when asked about his view of the Biden family’s business practices. «I saw it firsthand.» 

Advertisement
In an interview on Fox News' "Hannity" this month, Jason Galanis, inset, thanked President Donald Trump and lauded Republicans, such as Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, for bringing "the proof" to light about "the Biden crime family."

In an interview on Fox News’ «Hannity» this month, Jason Galanis, inset, thanked President Donald Trump and lauded Republicans, such as Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, for bringing «the proof» to light about «the Biden crime family.» (Facebook | AP)

Meanwhile, James Biden, Hunter’s uncle, is not sailing so smoothly, with Republicans requesting that the Trump administration prosecute the former president’s brother for lying to Congress. 

James Biden allegedly denied that his brother, the former president, met in May 2017 with his son’s business associate Tony Bobulinski while pursuing a deal with a Chinese-owned energy company, CEFC China Energy. 

Bobulinski, a key witness during the GOP’s impeachment inquiry on account of claims he was privy to unethical business dealings by the Biden family, recently lost a defamation battle in court against Fox News host Jessica Tarlov. 

Advertisement

‘MOST DAMNING EVIDENCE’: HUNTER BIDEN’S FULL PARDON RESURFACES DECADE OF CONTROVERSIES, ‘INFLUENCE-PEDDLING’

Bobulinski was seeking $30 million in damages after Tarlov claimed during an episode of «The Five» that Bobulinski’s legal fees were being paid for by a Trump-aligned political action committee.

Joe Biden, Tony Bobulinski, Hunter Biden split image

Former Hunter Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski, center, testified before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday about the Biden family’s alleged «influence peddling.» (Getty Images)

Another notable ex-business partner of Hunter Biden, Eric Schwerin, has kept a low profile ever since Republicans on the House Oversight Committee released his testimony from the GOP’s impeachment inquiry. In his testimony, Schwerin stated he was «not aware of any financial transactions or compensation» that Joe Biden received as vice president related to his family’s business dealings. 

Advertisement

Hunter Biden’s «Sugar brother» and lawyer, Kevin Morris, who helped finance the first son’s legal fees with a reported $6.5 million, later told associates that his generosity left him financially tapped. 

Kevin Morris walks outside of federal court

Kevin Morris walks outside the federal court as the trial of Hunter Biden on criminal gun charges continues, in Wilmington, Delaware, June 11, 2024. (Reuters/Hannah Beier)

According to a report by the N.Y. Post, Morris faced his own ethical issues when he was accused of spying on a movie production about President Biden called «My Son Hunter» that was being made in Serbia. The filmmaker involved with the project, filmaker Phelim McAleer, hit Morris with a bar complaint in 2022.

«He used deceit to secure such access by not disclosing he was Mr. Biden’s lawyer. Mr. Morris used his cover as a documentary filmmaker to conceal his true purpose: performing legal investigative work on behalf of his client, Mr. Hunter Biden,» McAleer said in his bar complaint.

Advertisement

The California Bar Association declined to disbar Morris in late 2024.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Ye Jianming, a Chinese billionaire and former chairman of CEFC China Energy, one of the companies Republicans alleged Hunter Biden sought to gain favor with using his family name, has reportedly disappeared from public view, Reuters reported in 2023. While his whereabouts are unknown, according to Reuters, Jianming’s name has appeared in graft trials of senior Chinese Communist Party officials and state bank executives.  

Advertisement

Hunter Biden,Hunter Biden investigation explained,Biden Cover-Up,Joe Biden,Politics

INTERNACIONAL

DHS fires back at Democrats for ‘beyond the pale’ rhetoric as ICE agents face wave of violent threats

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is continuing to call on Democrats to tone down the rhetoric against Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents as riots not only persisted in Los Angeles Sunday night, but agents continue to face threats of doxxing and violence.

Advertisement

The department has taken issue with not only California leaders but also House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. 

«The violent targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles by lawless rioters is despicable and Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom must call for it to end,» DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a Saturday statement. «The men and women of ICE put their lives on the line to protect and defend the lives of American citizens.» 

ACTING ICE DIRECTOR CALLS MAYOR WU’S NEO-NAZI COMPARISON ‘DISGUSTING’ AMID INCREASE IN AGENT ASSAULTS

Advertisement

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), led by Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, is continuing to call on Democrats to tone down the rhetoric against Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.  (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

«Make no mistake, Democrat politicians like Hakeem Jeffries, Mayor Wu of Boston, Tim Walz, and Mayor Bass of Los Angeles are contributing to the surge in assaults of our ICE officers through their repeated vilification and demonization of ICE,» McLaughlin stated. «From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi Gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale. This violence against ICE must end.» 
 
The department says there’s been a 413% increase in assaults against ICE agents, which comes as the riots in Los Angeles are centered against the presence of the agency in the city. 

Wu and Jeffries recently faced criticism for their comments on ICE agents masking while conducting sweeps to conceal their identity for safety reasons.

Advertisement

«Every single ICE agent who is engaged in this aggressive overreach and are trying to hide their identities from the American people will be unsuccessful in doing that,» Jeffries said on Capitol Hill. 

«This is America. This is not the Soviet Union,» he added, saying identification is needed to comply with the law and have proper «transparency.» «We’re not behind the Iron Curtain. This is not the 1930s. And every single one of them, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes, will of course be identified.» 

Wu was slammed for comments where she drew a tie between ICE and neo-Nazi group Nationalist Social Club-131 for the masking decision, which DHS called «sickening,» according to the Boston Herald.

Advertisement

FEDERAL OFFICIALS SLAM DEMOCRATS FOR ‘DANGEROUS’ RHETORIC AS ICE AGENTS FACE VIOLENT MOBS IN LA, NYC

In response to an online video of a Democratic state representative in Tennessee allegedly stalking ICE agents, the DHS said that "this Administration is not playing games with the lives and safety of our ICE officers." 

In response to an online video of a Democratic state representative in Tennessee allegedly stalking ICE agents, the DHS said that «this Administration is not playing games with the lives and safety of our ICE officers.»  (Minh Connors/Anadolu via Getty Images and ICE)

«I don’t know of any police department that routinely wears masks,» Wu said. «We know that there are other groups that routinely wear masks. NSC-131 routinely wears masks.» 

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who was the Democratic vice presidential nominee in 2024, also controversially drew a comparison to the Nazis in May. 

Advertisement

CLICK HERE FOR MORE IMMIGRATION COVERAGE

«I’m gonna start with the flashing red light — Donald Trump’s modern-day Gestapo is scooping folks up off the streets,» Walz claimed at a University of Minnesota law school commencement speech. «They’re in unmarked vans, wearing masks, being shipped off to foreign torture dungeons. No chance to mount a defense. Not even a chance to kiss a loved one goodbye. Just grabbed up by masked agents, shoved into those vans, and disappeared.» 

In California, the anti-ICE riots triggered an order from President Donald Trump to deploy to the National Guard, which Newsom is expected to take legal action against. Newsom repeatedly has said that the Trump administration has instigated the situation «to manufacture chaos and violence,» and has said that those who are committing «violent acts» will face legal repercussions and are playing into the president’s hands.

Advertisement

ICE OFFICIAL PUTS POLITICIANS ON BLAST, DEMANDING THEY ‘STOP PUTTING MY PEOPLE IN DANGER’

U.S. National Guard troops walking by vehicle

National Guard are deployed around downtown Los Angeles, Jun. 8, 2025, following an immigration raid protest the night before.  (Eric Thayer/The Associated Press)

«Continued chaotic federal sweeps, across California, to meet an arbitrary arrest quota are as reckless as they are cruel,» Newsom stated Friday. «Donald Trump’s chaos is eroding trust, tearing families apart, and undermining the workers and industries that power America’s economy.»

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called on residents not to «engage in violence and chaos» and to not «give the administration what they want,» Sunday in an X post, but faced scrutiny for Friday comments saying that «these tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

When Fox News Digital reached out to Newsom’s office about DHS’ comments, they sent a link to a post in which Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons credited Newsom for complying with ICE detainers for those already behind bars.

Fox News Digital reached out to the offices of Wu, Bass, Walz and Jeffries and did not receive replies. 

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

España: procesaron al Fiscal General, elegido por Pedro Sánchez, por revelar información que perjudica a la presidenta madrileña Isabel Díaz Ayuso

Published

on


Por primera vez en la historia de España, un fiscal general del Estado fue procesado y podría ser enjuiciado. Es lo que se desprende de la decisión que tomó este lunes un juez del Tribunal Supremo: procesó al fiscal general, Alvaro García Ortiz, acusándolo de haber cometido, presuntamente, un delito de revelación de secretos.

El juez instructor de la Sala Segunda del Supremo, Angel Hurtado, cree haber encontrado indicios de que el fiscal García Ortiz filtró a algunos medios españoles un correo electrónico con información sensible del novio de la presidenta de la Comunidad de Madrid y líder del Partido Popular madrileño, Isabel Díaz Ayuso.

Advertisement

Para el juez que investiga lo que sucedió, la filtración habría sido ideada desde la secretaría de gobierno de la presidencia de España y por intereses políticos.

El juez Hurtado llegó a la conclusión que el fiscal García Ortiz sabía que Alberto González Amador, el ciudadano al que se le reclamaba una deuda fiscal que habría intentado esquivar, era el novio de Díaz Ayuso.

El Tribunal Supremo procesó también a la fiscal provincial de Madrid, Pilar Rodríguez. Fue ella quien le envió al fiscal general del Estado los e-mails. El juez sostiene que Rodríguez sabría que la decisión era difundir esos correos para corregir una información que había publicado el diario El Mundo y que no era correcta.

Advertisement

El acto procesal contra el fiscal general del Estado no es firme. Se puede recurrir ante el juez Hurtado y ante la Sala en lo Penal del Supremo.

Si García Ortiz llegara a sentarse finalmente en el banquillo y fuera encontrado culpable, la pena que podría enfrentar alcanzaría los cuatro años de cárcel.

Alberto González Amador, pareja de la presidenta de la Comunidad de Madrid Isabel Díaz Ayuso. Foto EFE

Desde el entorno del fiscal aseguran que no piensa renunciar y que permanecerá en su cargo.

Advertisement

Después de siete meses

La investigación al fiscal general comenzó hace siete meses, cuando la pareja de Díaz Ayuso, Alberto González Amador, inició un proceso penal contra el fiscal general después de que la prensa española publicara el correo electrónico en el que su abogado reconocía que había cometido un fraude fiscal por más de 300 mil euros y le ofrecía un pacto a la fiscalía para evitar que el novio de la presidenta regional madrileña terminara en prisión.

A mediados de marzo del año pasado, la Fiscalía investigaba si el novio de la presidenta madrileña había defraudado al fisco 350 mil euros.

Advertisement

El diario El Mundo publicó que la Fiscalía le había ofrecido un pacto, información que no era correcta. Por eso, a las nueve y media de la noche del 13 de marzo de 2024, el fiscal general García Ortiz pidió los correos entre el abogado defensor de la pareja de Díaz Ayuso y el fiscal que seguía el caso.

A las diez de la noche los tenía en su poder. Minutos después, la web de otro medio español, La Sexta, corrigió lo que había publicado El Mundo: que, en realidad, había sido el defensor de González Amador quien había ofrecido reconocer los delitos a la Fiscalía a cambio de que el escándalo no salpicara a la presidenta de la Comunidad de Madrid.

Era casi medianoche cuando la home de la Cadena Ser publicó frases tomadas de esos e-mails. Y al día siguiente, El Plural, otro medio, mostraba capturas de pantalla del contenido de los correos electrónicos casi al mismo tiempo que circuló un comunicado de prensa de la Fiscalía en el que desmentía la información publicada por El Mundo.

Advertisement
 La presidenta del PP de Madrid y del Gobierno de la Comunidad de Madrid, Isabel Díaz Ayuso, durante la manifestación convocada por el Partido Popular contra el Gobierno de Pedro Sánchez. Foto EFE La presidenta del PP de Madrid y del Gobierno de la Comunidad de Madrid, Isabel Díaz Ayuso, durante la manifestación convocada por el Partido Popular contra el Gobierno de Pedro Sánchez. Foto EFE

González Amador denunció al fiscal general del Estado. Se allanaron sus despachos y su celular pero la Guardia Civil no encontró indicios: García Ortiz había hecho “limpieza” en su teléfono móvil.

El fiscal general justificó su comportamiento en que se trata de una práctica habitual -borrar mensajes y cambiar de celular- por motivos de seguridad.

El juez que lo imputa cree que destruyó pruebas.

Cómo se elige

Advertisement

“El fiscal general del Estado ostenta la jefatura superior y representación del Ministerio Fiscal. Es nombrado y cesado por el rey, a propuesta del gobierno, oído el Consejo General del Poder Judicial y previa valoración de su idoneidad por la comisión correspondiente del Congreso de los Diputados -aclaran en la web de la Fiscalía General del Estado-. Intervienen, pues, en su nombramiento los tres poderes del Estado. La elección debe recaer entre juristas españoles de reconocido prestigio y con más de quince años de ejercicio efectivo de su profesión. Tiene carácter de autoridad en todo el territorio español”.

“Alvaro García Ortiz es un servidor público ejemplar”, aseguró este lunes el ministro de Presidencia, Justicia y Relaciones con las Cortes, Félix Bolaños.

“Nuestra confianza, absoluta y plena, en el fiscal general del Estado -agregó-. Y en la fiscalía en su conjunto cuando se enfrentan a presuntos delincuentes y a defraudadores confesos.”

Advertisement

Desde el Partido Popular piden su renuncia: “Si el gobierno estuviera a la altura democrática de lo que el momento requiere, hoy mismo, a estas horas, estaría pidiéndole al fiscal general del Estado que se echara a un lado”, dijo Borja Semper, vocero parlamentario del Partido Popular.

Pedro Sánchez, desde Niza, donde participa en la Tercera Conferencia de los Océanos de la ONU, no abrió la boca.

Dos de las tres asociaciones que reúnen a los fiscales españoles piden la renuncia de García Ortiz. Para la Asociación de Fiscales y la Asociación Profesional e Independiente de Fiscales, “la situación es insostenible”.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

UN’s nuclear watchdog warns its unable to confirm Iran’s program is ‘entirely peaceful’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Iran’s refusal to play ball with the United Nation’s nuclear watchdog, which is charged with monitoring all nations’ nuclear programs, has meant the body cannot verify whether Tehran’s program is «entirely peaceful» despite the regime’s claims.

Advertisement

Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, on Monday issued a warning statement that the agency has not only long been barred access to old and new nuclear sites, but that Iran has scrubbed locations in an apparent move to cover up its activities.

In 2020, the IAEA found man-made particles of enriched uranium at three sites, including Varamin, Marivan and Turquzabad. The locations were previously utilized in Iran’s nuclear program and gave the agency credence to believe Tehran had once again turned to deadly nuclear ambitions. 

US SANCTIONS MONEY LAUNDERING NETWORK AIDING IRAN AS REGIME FACES NUCLEAR REPRIMAND AT IAEA

Advertisement

Rafael Grossi is increasingly concerned about Iran’s nuclear program.  (Albert Otti/picture alliance via Getty Images)

«Since then, we have been seeking explanations and clarifications from Iran for the presence of these uranium particles, including through a number of high-level meetings and consultations in which I have been personally involved,» Grossi said. «Unfortunately, Iran has repeatedly either not answered, or not provided technically credible answers to, the Agency’s questions. 

«It has also sought to sanitize the locations, which has impeded Agency verification activities,» he added. 

Advertisement

Grossi, who confirmed during an April trip to Washington, D.C. that the IAEA has not been involved in nuclear negotiations between the U.S. and Iran, said on Monday that he has been working «closely and intensively» with both parties in «support of their bilateral negotiation[s].»

The warning comes after the IAEA in a report late last month, also confirmed that Iran had drastically increased its stockpile of near-weapons-grade enriched uranium by nearly 35% in three months. 

IRAN’S KHAMENEI REJECTS US ZERO URANIUM ENRICHMENT DEMAND AS ‘100% AGAINST’ ITS INTERESTS

Advertisement
Iran nuclear

This photo released on Nov. 5, 2019, by the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran shows centrifuge machines in the Natanz uranium enrichment facility in central Iran.  (Atomic Energy Organization of Iran via AP, File)

In February, the IAEA assessed that Tehran possessed 274.8 kilograms (605.8 pounds) worth of uranium enriched to 60%, but on May 17th it found Iran now has some 408.6 kilograms (900.8 pounds) – meaning the regime is just a technical step away from being able to make up to 10 nuclear warheads. 

Last week, Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei came out in strong opposition to a U.S. proposal submitted to Tehran to end its nuclear program, though it remains unclear what details were included in the document, including on enrichment capabilities, and on Sunday, Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf claimed the proposal didn’t include any sanction relief.

The White House has remained tight-lipped about what was included in the document, though according to some reporting, President Donald Trump gave Iran until June 11 to reach a deal with the U.S., though Fox News Digital could not independently verify these claims. 

Advertisement

On Monday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei confirmed that «The U.S. proposal is not acceptable to us. It was not the result of previous rounds of negotiations.»

Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei

Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei attends a press conference in Tehran, Iran, on May 26, 2025.  An interim nuclear agreement between Iran and the United States is not on Iran’s agenda, Baghaei said. (Shadati/Xinhua via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«We will present our own proposal to the other side via Oman after it is finalized. This proposal is reasonable, logical, and balanced,» Baghaei reportedly said.

Advertisement

Some reporting has also suggested Iran might submit their proposal as soon as June 10, though the Iranian UN mission in the U.S. would not comment on or confirm these claims. 


Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias

Copyright © 2025 NDM - Noticias del Momento | #Noticias #Chimentos #Política #Fútbol #Economía #Sociedad