Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Wisconsin judge’s arrest blasted by Democrats who previously claimed ‘no one is above the law’ in Trump cases

Published

on


Several Democrats who have argued that «no one is above the law» in President Donald Trump’s cases are now condemning the arrest of Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan, warning it could threaten the rule of law.

«This is not normal,» Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., tweeted of Dugan’s arrest by the FBI on proceeding obstruction charges for allegedly shielding an indicted Mexican migrant from ICE agents. 

Advertisement

«The administration’s arrest of a sitting judge in Wisconsin is a drastic move that threatens the rule of law,» Klobuchar added, saying it’s a «grave step and undermines our system of checks and balances.»

During Trump’s 2019 impeachment, Klobuchar said his first impeachment case marked a «somber day for our country.»

FBI ARRESTS JUDGE, ALLEGING SHE OBSTRUCTED ARREST OF ILLEGAL ALIEN

Advertisement

«In America, no one is above the law, and the American people deserve to hear evidence and witness testimony during a full and fair trial in the Senate. If the president has any facts to present in his defense to the articles of impeachment, we should hear them,» she said.

After the 2022 FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, Klobuchar said, «The law is king, and the former president isn’t.»

Sen. Tina Smith, D-Minn., also condemned Dugan’s arrest, saying, «If [FBI Director] Kash Patel and Donald Trump don’t like a judge, they think they can arrest them.

Advertisement

«This is stunning — we must stand up to this blatant power grab. Republicans: How is this not a red line for you?»

AG PAM BONDI OUTRAGED AT WISCONSIN JUDGE ARRESTED FOR OBSTRUCTING ARREST OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT

Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan speaking raising her hands

Judge Hannah Dugan speaks during a forum at the Milwaukee Bar Association (Imagn)

Commenting in 2020 on her vote to remove Trump from office over abuse of power allegations, Smith said she took her constitutional oath seriously and that «to condone corrupt behavior such as this undermines the core value that we stand for as a nation — that no one is above the law, including and most especially our president.»

Advertisement

Smith said she pored over presentations and evidence to reach that conclusion.

Rep. Gwen Moore, D-Wis., who represents Dugan’s county, lambasted the White House, saying its «willingness to weaponize federal law enforcement is shocking and this arrest has all the hallmarks of overreach.»

«I will be following this case closely and facts will come out. However, I am very alarmed at the increasingly lawless actions of the Trump administration, and in particular ICE, who have been defying courts and acting with disregard for the Constitution.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

smith moore klobuchar

Senators Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith and Rep. Gwen Moore criticized the judge’s arrest. (Getty)

Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., commented on an apparently deleted tweet from Patel, writing on X, «Donald Trump and JD Vance are arresting judges now. Deleting the tweet won’t undo the constitutional crisis you have just thrust us into.»

In a 2023 interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt, Khanna said of the Trump impeachment, «You can’t just say, ‘OK, because someone was president or someone is a candidate, that you’re above the law.’ Everyone is under the law, and that allegations, the evidence needs to be pursued.»

Advertisement

When reached for comment by Fox News Digital, Khanna said of the contrast that Trump has «waged war on the judiciary» and that there is no public evidence yet regarding Dugan, but «it is deeply concerning given the administration’s attacks on the courts.»

«Even Chief Justice Roberts has rebuked Trump’s conduct toward the judiciary,» Khanna added.

Ro Khanna congress

Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., questions witnesses during a roundtable on Supreme Court ethics hosted by House Oversight Committee Democrats, Washington, D.C., June 11, 2024. (Allison Bailey/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Wis., said norms were being violated on the immigration and legal fronts for Dugan’s arrest.

Advertisement

In a statement obtained by Fox News Digital, Pocan laid out the differences he sees between the Dugan and Trump cases: «Judge Dugan’s arrest is outrageous and a fear tactic to our independent judiciary. Trump has always thought he was above the law, but now he’s enabling his goons to push that limit as far as it can go. His reckless deportations and flaunting of the Constitution will fail,» Pocan said.

«This is stuff I expect from Third World countries,» he told Axios.

In a December 2019 statement after his vote in favor of impeachment, Pocan said Trump was «never held accountable for his actions» over his 70-plus years of life.

Advertisement

«Today, Democrats sent a clear signal to this president and all future presidents: No one is above the law.»

Fox News Digital reached out to the offices of Klobuchar and Smith for comment.

Advertisement

Politics,Donald Trump,Wisconsin,Law,Senate Democrats,House of Representatives Democrats

Advertisement
Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

How Donald Trump tried to court the Atlantic – and why the liberal magazine landed an interview

Published

on


Hell hath frozen over: At the White House the other day, Donald Trump «was launching a charm offensive, directed mainly at Goldberg,» as in Jeffrey Goldberg, the Atlantic’s editor-in-chief. «There was none of the name-calling or hostility he regularly levels at our magazine.»

That’s according to Atlantic reporters Ashley Parker and Michael Scherer, who wrote the magazine’s cover story, which was posted yesterday.

Advertisement

For all the insights gleaned from the interview, nothing is more fascinating than how it came about.

They called the president on his cell phone. (Wha? Who do I have to court to get that? The reporters ain’t saying.)

Trump says he did the initial phone interview to see if the liberal magazine could be fair.

Advertisement

PRESIDENT TRUMP TELLS THE ATLANTIC HE RUNS THE COUNTRY ‘AND THE WORLD’

So I’m here to pronounce that the entire, seemingly endless piece is fair. The president hasn’t taken a shot at it on Truth Social, at least so far.

He has, however, ripped new polls from the «Failing New York Times» and «ABC/Washington Post» as «FAKE POLLS FROM FAKE NEWS ORGANIZATIONS,» saying they should be «investigated for ELECTION FRAUD, and add in the Fox News Pollster while you’re at it.» His lowest approval rating, in the Post-ABC survey, was 39 percent.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, we may now look back on Trump’s 2024 victory as inevitable, but after Jan. 6 it was anything but. On the cell call, «The president seemed exhilarated by everything he had managed to do in the first two months of his second term.»

President Trump recently gave an interview to The Atlantic. (BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

And then came the transaction: «As ever, Trump was on the hunt for a deal. If he liked the story we wrote, he said, he might even speak with us again.»

Advertisement

Goldberg describes the session: «What I found in this particular meeting was a Trump who was low-key, attentive, and eager to convince us that he is good at his job and good for the country. It isn’t easy to escape the tractor beam of his charisma, but somehow we managed, and we asked him what needed to be asked. 

«But squaring Trump the Charmer with the Orcish Trump we more frequently see is difficult…Trump posted on the social-media platform he owns that Ashley is a ‘Radical Left Lunatic’ (she is not) and that Michael ‘has never written a fair story about me, only negative, and virtually always LIES’ (also false). It is our task at the Atlantic not to be bullied by these sorts of attacks.»

STATE OF WAR: HOW TRUMP IS FIGHTING A 9-FRONT BATTLE

Advertisement

The most interesting Trump sound bite is his comparison of the two terms:

«The first time, I had two things to do—run the country and survive; I had all these crooked guys. And the second time, I run the country and the world.»

Parker and Scherer did many other interviews, such as with Steve Bannon. «Our reality is that we won,» and he cited the conspiracy theory that the FBI had incited the crowd on Jan. 6. The reporters said that was simply untrue. 

Advertisement

«Now, here’s the interesting thing,» Bannon said. «Who’s won that argument? I think we have…

«This time it’s ‘Hey, f**k you, Greenland’s ours…When you’ve come back from such long odds, you clearly feel, ‘I can do anything.’ »

What about the four criminal investigations, including the conviction on the weakest one – Alvin Bragg’s hush money case? Trump says his numbers kept going up.

Advertisement

INTERVIEWING DONALD TRUMP: A LAST-MINUTE BLITZ AND NEW CLOSING MESSAGE

«Shockingly, yes,» Trump said. «Normally, it would knock you out. You wouldn’t even live for the next day. You know, you’d announce your resignation, and you’d go back and ‘fight for your name,’ like everybody says—you know, ‘fight for your name, go back to your family.’ …Yeah, it made me stronger, made me a lot stronger.»

He also said in the phone interview: «I got indicted five different times by five different scumbags, and they’re all looking for jobs now, so it’s one of those things. Who would have thought, right? It’s been pretty amazing.»

Advertisement

After the 2016 election, Trump told oil executives at Mar-a-Lago:

If I’m not president, you’re f***ed. Look at your profit-and-loss statements. You realize what would have happened to you if she was president? What’s wrong with you?») She was Kamala Harris, of course.

A split of Trump's mugshot and White House portrait

Referring to the criminal cases against him – including the charges brought forth by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, Trump said «it made [him] stronger.» (Fulton County Sheriff’s Office via AP / Trump-Vance Transition Team)

One turning point: When he went to East Palestine, Ohio after the derailment of a train carrying toxic chemicals, while Joe Biden didn’t do squat.

Advertisement

On the Kennedy Center: «I didn’t really get to go the first time, because I was always getting impeached or some bulls**t, and I could never enjoy a show.» So he fired the Democrats and made himself chairman.

All right, enough quotes. Wait, one more that captures the tone of the piece:

«I got 38 percent of the male Black vote. Nobody knew that was possible. That’s a lot. I got 56 percent of Hispanics. How about that one? Every county along the Texas border is Hispanic. I won every one of them.» Though every single number he cited was wrong, the general thrust of his observation was correct.»

Advertisement

The reporters chronicled how things have gone south for the president, especially on tariffs and the economy, and how he pressured Hill Republicans into backing his nominees with primary threats. 

SUBSCRIBE TO HOWIE’S MEDIA BUZZMETER PODCAST, A RIFF ON THE DAY’S HOTTEST STORIES

After the March phone interview, the reporters tried Trump’s cellphone again. Just got voice mail. But at 1:38 am, he tried them back. No message.

Advertisement

Trump believes he can win over even his worst enemies. In 2015 or 2016, I watched him make a beeline in the New York green room for Karl Rove, who was very rough on him. At worst, he thinks, he can neutralize the person. Or soften him or her up for the next time. He enjoys the challenge.

The mainstream media almost uniformly can’t stand Donald Trump. He does invite some of his own negative headlines, while providing unprecedented access, but much of the press is back in Resistance mode. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Still, the Atlantic’s original pitch is undeniable, that he’s «The Most Consequential President of the 21st Century.»

Media Buzz,Donald Trump,Media

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Islamofobia en Francia: matan de 40 puñaladas a un joven en una mezquita

Published

on


Francia está conmovida por un crimen de odio e islamofobia en la mezquita Khadidja, en La Grand Combe, Aboukabar Cissé, un joven albañil de 22 años nacido en Mali, fue brutalmente atacado el viernes, con un cuchillo, en esta pequeña localidad de las Cevenes, a 60 kilómetros de Nimes. Murió por las 40 puñaladas que le dio Olivier H, un francés de origen bosnio, que se entregó este lunes a la policía, tras huir a Italia el fin de semana.

El hombre de 20 años, sospechoso de apuñalar a muerte a Aboukabar, fue arrestado y será transferido a Francia próximamente. Fue tres días después de que el asesinato conmocionara a los musulmanes franceses, los sumergiera en una ola de temores e impulsara al presidente Macron a condenar este crimen islamofóbico.

Advertisement

Olivier H se entregó en una comisaría de policía en Pistoia, cerca de Florencia. El sospechoso filmó a Aboubakar Cissé, la víctima, mientras agonizaba con más de 40 puñaladas en la mezquita, en un pueblito en las colinas de Cévennes, al norte de Nimes.

Según AFP, el asesino, publicó un video en una red social, justo antes de cometer su crimen. En esta escena, supuestamente hizo comentarios islamofóbicos.

Advertisement

Marcha silenciosa

Una marcha silenciosa se organizó el domingo en el pueblito en homenaje a Aboukabar. Para muchos manifestantes presentes, musulmanes o no, el asesinato perpetrado el viernes no fue otra cosa que un «crimen islamofóbico».

Una marcha este domingo para denunciar la islamofobia de la «ultraderecha que mata». Foto: EFE

Con una rama de olivo en la mano izquierda, Marjorie, que llegó de un pueblo vecino a la marcha, no tiene dudas al respecto. «Vine a rendir homenaje a este joven, que murió postrado, cuando rezaba», dice. “Esto es chocante para mí, que asisto a una mezquita. Vine a denunciar la creciente islamofobia en este país, que me asusta”.

Advertisement

“¡Es un crimen islamofóbico!”, responde una mujer entre la multitud mientras un hombre, a su vez, habla en las escaleras del ayuntamiento para denunciar los crímenes perpetrados en Palestina. La marcha por Aboubakar se convirtió en una manifestación contra la islamofobia.

La islamofobia en Francia

Abdelkrim Grini, fiscal de Alès, la ciudad grande más cercana, declaró que estaba investigando bajo la premisa de que el asesinato fue un crimen de odio. La policía afirmó que el presunto atacante era un aficionado a los videojuegos, que vivía de la prestación social mínima del estado, y no tenía ninguna conexión con la mezquita ni con el islam.

Advertisement

Identificado únicamente como Olivier, el atacante nació en Francia en 2004 y está desempleado sin antecedentes penales. Grini afirmó que era «extremadamente peligroso» y que era «esencial» su arresto antes de que se cobrara más víctimas.

Los musulmanes tienen miedo. Piensan que persiguen su estilo de vida, su forma de vestir, su velo, y su comida. No se sienten seguros.

Mas de 5,4 millones de franceses son musulmanes. El islam es considerado la segunda religión en Francia, después del cristianismo. Con una población francesa de 68 millones de personas, los musulmanes representan el 8 por ciento de la población del país.

Advertisement
La mezquita Khadidja, donde murió la víctima. Foto: ReutersLa mezquita Khadidja, donde murió la víctima. Foto: Reuters

Bruno Retailleau, ministro del Interior, felicitó al fiscal y a la policía por la exitosa conclusión de una investigación, en la que participaron 75 agentes.

Olivier, el sospechoso, era considerado “extremadamente peligroso” debido a sus afirmaciones, en un espantoso video publicado en redes sociales, en el que afirmaba que odiaba a los musulmanes y aspiraba a convertirse en un asesino en serie, según Retailleau.

El ministro acudió el domingo al lugar del crimen en la deprimida antigua ciudad minera de carbón, con una alta población musulmana, después de que cientos de personas participaran en la marcha silenciosa en memoria de Cissé.

El asesinato ha conmocionado a La Grand Combe, una de las ciudades más pobres de Francia, cuya población de 5.000 habitantes está compuesta principalmente por descendientes de inmigrantes musulmanes, que se asentaron allí atraídos por las minas de carbón.

Advertisement

Cissé, quien recientemente se había graduado como albañil, fue descripto como un pilar trabajador de la pequeña congregación local.

Las declaraciones de Macron

El presidente Macron expresó sus condolencias y ofreció su apoyo a «nuestros conciudadanos musulmanes», en una publicación en X. Añadió: «El racismo y el odio basados ​​en la religión no tienen cabida en Francia. La libertad de culto no puede ser violada«.

Advertisement

François Bayrou, el primer ministro, ya había denunciado lo que describió como una «atrocidad islamófoba». «Apoyamos a los seres queridos de la víctima, a los creyentes que están tan conmocionados» dijo el `premier.

Una comunidad en alerta

Los líderes musulmanes lamentaron lo que, según ellos, fue “una incapacidad de las autoridades para comprender el grado de odio y violencia que enfrenta su comunidad”.

Advertisement
El hermano de Aboubakar Cisse. Foto: EFEEl hermano de Aboubakar Cisse. Foto: EFE

Activistas antirracistas han criticado al gobierno por no reaccionar con la misma indignación que aplica a los asesinatos cometidos por musulmanes. Dominique Sopo, director del grupo activista SOS Racismo, acusó a Retailleau de eludir su deber de denunciar el asesinato.

“Es el ministro encargado de las actividades religiosas. Pero cuando se sabe que este crimen está, al menos en parte, motivado por el odio hacia los musulmanes, se impone un silencio ensordecedor”, declaró en la radio France Info.

El Consejo Francés de la Fe Musulmana se declaró “horrorizado” por el “ataque terrorista antimusulmán” e instó a los musulmanes en Francia a mantenerse “extremadamente alertas”.

Macron declaró tras el ataque que “no hay lugar para el racismo” en Francia.

Advertisement

El Consejo Representativo de Instituciones Judías de Francia declaró: “El asesinato de un fiel en una mezquita es un crimen despreciable que debe indignar a todos los franceses”.

Ser musulmán

El líder de La Francia Insumisa (LFI) Jean Luc Mélenchon fue interpelado por una joven musulmana durante la manifestación en París en homenaje a Aboubakar Cissé.

Advertisement

«Señor Mélenchon, los musulmanes ya no nos sentimos seguros», exclamó la joven, dirigiéndose al líder de Francia Insumisa. «Nos vamos con mariposas en el estómago. Ya no nos sentimos seguros en absoluto. Hemos cruzado una línea roja», dijo, visiblemente conmovida.

La media luna de la mezquita Khadidja. Foto: ReutersLa media luna de la mezquita Khadidja. Foto: Reuters

Una emoción compartida por Jean-Luc Mélenchon, quien, con los ojos enrojecidos, respondió: “Por supuesto, señora, permítame besarla o estrecharle la mano”, pasando sus palabras a la acción y tomando a la mujer en sus brazos. «Tenemos miedo, señor Mélenchon. Todos los musulmanes tienen miedo, señor Mélenchon», añadió la joven entre lágrimas.

Mélenchon también intervino en la manifestación para denunciar el clima político islamófobo, que, según el líder Insumiso, fue responsable del asesinato de Aboubakar Cissé.

Jean-Luc Melenchon. Foto: ReutersJean-Luc Melenchon. Foto: Reuters

«Se mantuvo, se cultivó, una atmósfera, un clima islamófobo durante meses. Y todos, hasta los más altos oficiales, se sintieron autorizados a hacer declaraciones, cuyo alcance y violencia para quienes tuvieron que soportarlas, sin duda no apreciaron», declaró Jean-Luc Mélenchon a la prensa, dirigiéndose al ministro Bruno Retailleau.

«Cuando el ministro del Interior, en una reunión (el 27 de marzo, durante una manifestación contra el islamismo), dijo: ‘abajo el velo’, ¿podemos imaginar que alguien gritara ‘abajo los crucifijos’?», se preguntó. «Cuando se mantiene una atmósfera así, no debemos esperar otra cosa que las mentes más perturbadas encuentren justificación a sus acciones», añadió.

Advertisement

Bruno Retailleau, criticado por su lenta reacción ante el asesinato de Aboubakar Cissé, no asistió a la manifestación, argumentando que los Insumisos estaban «explotando este crimen».

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Lawsuit alleges anti-Israel group leaders are ‘Hamas’ foot soldiers in New York City’

Published

on


A lawsuit filed in the Southern District of New York last month claims the leaders of several radical anti-Israel groups involved in 18 months of disruptive, violent and antisemitic protests on campuses and in the streets of New York City are «accountable for aiding and abetting Hamas’ continuing acts of international terrorism.»

In purported violation of the Antiterrorism Act and the Alien Tort Statue, the defendants are said to have «acted as Hamas’ foot soldiers in New York City,» and may have had foreknowledge of the designated foreign terror organization’s devastating Oct. 7 attacks.

Advertisement

Defendants in the case are Within Our Lifetime and its founder Nerdeen Kiswani, Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and its representative Maryam Alwan, Columbia-Barnard Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and its representative Cameron Jones, and Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD) and its representative Mahmoud Khalil, who is currently in custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The lawsuit asserts that the associational defendants have «distribute[d] Hamas-created and affiliated propaganda, incite[d] fear and violence, and attack[ed] critical academic, economic, and infrastructure centers in New York City,» as well as having «repeatedly terrorized and assaulted Jews across New York City and on Columbia University’s campus, physically assaulted Columbia University employees, and illegally seized and damaged public and private property.»

DUFFY SLAMS MTA OVER ‘FACT CHECK’ ON ANTI-ISRAEL MOB’S GRAND CENTRAL TAKEOVER

Advertisement

Nerdeen Kiswani, co-founder and leader of Within Our Lifetime, speaks at a demonstration near Columbia University on Feb. 2, 2024, in New York City. (Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images)

The details of the allegations are thorough. To demonstrate how the defendants «resoundingly and knowingly answered Hamas’ call to action» on and after Oct. 7, the lawsuit cites how the defendants knowingly «obtain[ed] and disseminat[ed]» a Hamas propaganda document, which contained directions created by the Hamas Media Office for spinning the narrative of their deadly attacks. By «painstakingly follow[ing]» the document, the lawsuit alleges defendants «directly responded to, and followed orders from, Hamas.» 

The lawsuit also supplies several indicators that defendants may have had foreknowledge of the heinous Oct. 7 attack, to include «a highly suggestive social media post published moments before the October 7 attack began» in which Columbia SJP posted on Instagram «We are back!!» after a months-long hiatus. 

Advertisement

On Oct. 7, Kiswani utilized marketing materials that «would not be released until the next day» in a National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) «Toolkit» demonstrating how SJP organizations across the country could support the Gazan «resistance.» 

Hamas releases Israeli hostages

Emaciated Israeli hostages, from left, Ohad Ben Ami, Eli Sharabi and Or Levy are taken by terrorists to a stage before being handed over to the Red Cross in Deir al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip on Feb. 8, 2025. (AP/Abdel Kareem Hana)

Following Oct. 7, Within Our Lifetime promoted a «Day of Rage» in New York City while Columbia SJP and Columbia JVP promoted their own «Day of Resistance.» The mere announcements of these events forced closures of Jewish schools and institutions, and «even forced Columbia University – a non-Jewish institution – to close its campus as a safety precaution,» while Jewish students «were advised to lock their doors and remain inside for their own safety,» according to the lawsuit. 

The lawsuit names Khalil as the purported leader of Columbia SJP’s Day of Resistance.

Advertisement

COLUMBIA’S ANTI-ISRAEL PROTESTERS SAY TRUMP PULLING $400 MILLION IN GRANTS FROM UNIVERSITY IS A ‘SCARE TACTIC’

In November 2023, the suit describes how a «’Shut it Down for Palestine’ event descended into – as planned – anti-Jewish and vitriolic hatred and threats,» with speakers shouting «Death to Jews!» and «encourage[ing] Hamas and… comrades across Columbia’s campus to hunt down and assault pro-Israel students.» 

The next day, Columbia University suspended Columbia SJP and Columbia JVP, at which time «Khalil and former members and/or organizers of Columbia SJP became leaders of CUAD.» As a result, CUAD «became the primary organizer of the violent and antisemitic protests that would foment terror, sow discord, and disrupt campus life at Columbia for over a year.» 

Advertisement
hamas terror gaza strip

Hamas terrorists kidnap a bloodied Israeli woman into the Gaza Strip. (Hamas-Telegram)

Khalil would later become the lead negotiator of the Columbia encampment, which the lawsuit notes was «well-supplied with identical tents, toiletries, food, and professional signage.» Based on a statement from Shlomi Ziv, a plaintiff in the lawsuit who was held captive by Hamas for 246 days following his kidnapping at the Nova Music Festival, «Hamas and [American Muslims for Palestine (AMP)]/NSJP provided financial, organizational, and other support… for the Encampment.»

Ziv alleges that his «Hamas captors bragged about having Hamas operatives on American university campuses,» and even «showed him Al-Jazeera stories and photographs of protests at Columbia University that were organized by Associational Defendants.»

APPARENT ANTI-ISRAEL ACTIVISTS SPLASH RED PAINT ON HOMES OF JEWISH OFFICIALS AT BROOKLYN MUSEUM 

Advertisement
Pro-Palestinian demonstrators attend a protest at Columbia University

Anti-Israel demonstrators attend a protest at Columbia University in New York City, just days after the Hamas slaughter in southern Israel, Oct. 12, 2023. (Julia Bonavita/Fox News Digital)

Given the «legal chasm between independent political advocacy and coordinating with a foreign terrorist organization to seed pro-terror propaganda throughout America’s largest city,» the lawsuit alleges the defendants’ «actions violate the Antiterrorism Act and the law of nations.»

According to the Jerusalem Post, the National Jewish Advocacy Center, Greenberg Traurig LLP, the Schoen Law Firm, and the Holtzman Vogel Law Firm filed the suit on behalf of plaintiffs who include Ziv, several Columbia University students who have served with the Israel Defense Forces, and a number of American and Israeli citizens whose family members, most of whom are believed dead, remain in Hamas captivity. 

Free Palestine demonstration at Columbia University

People protest the banning of Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace at Columbia University on Nov. 20, 2023 in New York City. (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

The lawsuit especially states that Khalil, «on information and belief, directly coordinates with Hamas, AMP/NSJP and/or other agents and affiliates of Hamas and related terrorist organizations.» The filers state that his detention by ICE in March may have been «based on many of his actions described in this Complaint.»

Advertisement

Khalil’s involvement in the Columbia protests was cited as a rationale for his removal during his April 11 hearing, when Judge Jamee Comans ruled that Khalil may be deported. Khalil also withheld past employment with the Syrian office in the Beirut British Embassy and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) as well as his membership in the CUAD when applying for a green card.

This withholding of information, according to federal officials, made Khalil «inadmissible at the time of his adjustment.»

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Disruptive events in New York City show no signs of abating. In March, students stormed a classroom at Columbia University and took over a building in affiliated Barnard College, where they assaulted an employee. A Within Our Lifetime protest on April 7 «took over» the main concourse of Grand Central Station.

Fox News Digital reached out to CUAD, Columbia SJP, Within Our Lifetime, and Columbia-Barnard JVP for comment about the allegations contained within the lawsuit, but received no response.

Advertisement


Advertisement
Continue Reading

LO MAS LEIDO

Tendencias

Copyright © 2025 NDM - Noticias del Momento | #Noticias #Chimentos #Política #Fútbol #Economía #Sociedad