Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

A closer look at Air Force One and the executive fleet

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump has his sights on a new version of Air Force One as delays and cost overruns continue to plague Boeing’s long-awaited presidential aircraft replacements.

Advertisement

The most recent data from 2020 says at least 20 planes make up the executive fleet. A newly constructed plane has not been added in nearly 27 years. Some of the ones currently in service are expected to stay flying for another 13 years.

«They’re not building the plane fast enough. I mean, they’re actually in default,» Trump said about Boeing in a February interview with Sean Hannity.

Air Force One is used to designate any Air Force aircraft carrying the commander in chief. There are currently two highly customized Boeing aircraft that were deployed in 1990 when George H.W. Bush was president. The planes have since carried Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Trump, Joe Biden and now Trump once again.

Advertisement

WHATEVER HAPPENED TO: THE QATAR AIR FORCE ONE JET

President Donald Trump boards Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport in Allentown, Pa., Aug. 3, 2025.  (Reuters/Ken Cedeno)

«I miss Air Force One,» Bush said at an event for Veterans in 2014. «In eight years, they never lost my baggage.»

Advertisement

The two forthcoming Boeing planes have been plagued by delays due to the complex technology needed onboard Air Force One.

«They’ve got to debug it, make sure there’s no signals intelligence risks. And I think just to make it secure against any potential military attacks. It was ironic for a long time. It was one of the Prince’s planes, which I think they were trying to sell. And now they’re giving it to the U.S., and it’s costing quite a bit to update,» staff writer for the Free Press Jay Solomon said.

The Qatari jet is estimated to have a faster timeline than the two Boeing planes, but it still needs some of the same technology to make it Air Force One.

Advertisement

«If you look at it just through economics, maybe it makes sense, but I still think the fact that we’re allowing a foreign country to gift something of that magnitude to a sitting president on top of all these other concerns,» Soloman said. «I think it’s a risk, and it’s not a good look.»

Air Force One is required to have four engines, unlike most of today’s passenger planes which have two. Onboard is the highest level of classified communications and external protections against foreign surveillance. The planes are equipped with air-to-air refueling capabilities so they can fly for as long as is needed. Air Force One is built for the worst possible scenarios, like nuclear war, so that the president can still command military forces from the sky.

«They’re extremely complex, and I’m not going to go into it, but they’re not like a normal plane. You know, it’s not like building a 747 normal,» Trump said during his Middle East Trip on «Special Report» in May.

Advertisement

TRUMP ACCEPTS JET FROM QATAR, WILL REFIT TO SERVE AS AIR FORCE ONE, DOD SAYS

Air Force one on the tarmac with military members outside

Qatari military aircraft perform a flyover before President Donald Trump departs on Air Force One from Al Udeid Air Base, en-route to Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, in Doha, Qatar, May 15, 2025. (Reuters/Brian Snyder)

Air Force officials say it is possible to add some of the security features to the Qatari jet, but it’s unlikely to have the full suite of technology by Trump’s February timeline.

«Initially it was supposed to be like, maybe he’ll get it done by the end of his presidency,» Solomon said.

Advertisement

Four modified Boeing 757s or C-32As are the newest planes in the executive fleet. Those were added in 1998 and 1999. The Air Force is studying potential replacement options, but the current planes will continue to fly until 2038. The aircraft are primarily used by the vice president, Cabinet members, members of Congress and other officials.

«Even today and regardless of the airplane, we have to operate it differently based on the threat environment that even the current or any of the future aircraft will go into. Again, can’t talk in detail about that, but that is always a consideration,» Air Force Secretary Troy Meink said during a June Senate Hearing. 

Air Force One isn’t the only aging plane; much of the executive fleet is more than two decades old. The aircraft have undergone modernization modifications, but officials have questioned the timeline for major updates as several incidents have taken place over the years.

Advertisement

INSIDE AMERICA’S 6TH-GEN ARSENAL: B-21, F-47, AND THE FUTURE OF AIR DOMINANCE

Boeing planes parked on tarmac

The Boeing 777X and Boeing 737 MAX 10 planes are among models considered for an updated executive fleet. (Reuters/Lindsey Wasson)

In 2014, Obama was forced to switch planes during a campaign event in Philadelphia after a minor mechanical problem was reported on Air Force One.

In 2021, Vice President Kamala Harris’ plane requested an emergency return to Joint Base Andrews as she began her first foreign trip overseas to Guatemala and Mexico.

Advertisement

Most recently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s plane was forced to turn around while en route to Munich in February, after a mechanical issue.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The newest aircraft among the executive fleet are the Marine One Helicopters. Biden first rode in the newly designed Marine One in 2024 during the Democratic National Convention. Updating those took nearly two decades and in some cases replaced helicopters flying since the 1970s.

Advertisement

The Boeing 777X is expected to be the next new major commercial aircraft. It’s scheduled to enter service in 2026 after a nearly six-year delay with Lufthansa taking the first flight. The modernized plane is designed to have a folding wingtip, a touchscreen flight deck and wider cabin space.

executive,donald trump,white house,airlines,special report

INTERNACIONAL

NYC mayoral rivals unite against billionaire ‘election interference’ as campaign enters final stretch

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

With two weeks until Election Day, Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani and Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa have landed on unlikely common ground: rejecting billionaire influence in the New York City mayoral election.

Advertisement

Two billionaires, Red Apple Media CEO John Catsimatidis and hedge fund CEO Bill Ackman, are calling on Sliwa to drop out of the mayoral race in order to clear a pathway to victory for former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is running as an Independent candidate.

«The billionaires can conspire to pick their candidate,» Sliwa said during a press conference in Manhattan on Monday. «I trust the people. They will make the decision. I will not drop out.»

BILL ACKMAN JUMPS INTO NYC MAYORAL FIGHT, SAYS SLIWA MUST DROP OR ‘WE ARE TOAST’

Advertisement

New York City mayoral nominee Curtis Sliwa speaks to reporters in Manhattan on Monday, Oct. 20, 2025, with two weeks until Election Day. (Fox News Digital/Deirdre Heavey)

Several blocks downtown at his own press conference Monday morning, Mamdani admitted his surprise to agree with Sliwa. 

«I never thought I would say this, but here we are, where the only candidates who agree that billionaires shouldn’t control the future of this city are the Republican nominee and the Democratic nominee,» Mamdani said. 

Advertisement

Catsimatidis, who is also the CEO of WABC Radio, publicly urged Sliwa to drop out of the race on Monday. Sliwa has long hosted a radio program on WABC but is on leave while he runs for mayor. 

«Curtis would make the best mayor of all the candidates … but Curtis has to realize that he should love New York more than anything else,» he said. «It certainly looks like Curtis should pull out right now.» 

«I’m not dropping out,» Sliwa reaffirmed to reporters on Monday while responding to Catsimatidis’ plea. 

Advertisement

TOP 5 MOMENTS FROM FIERY NYC MAYORAL DEBATE: ‘HE LITERALLY HAS NEVER HAD A JOB’

New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani

New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani fields reporter questions in Manhattan on Monday, Oct. 20, 2025. (Fox News Digital/Deirdre Heavey)

A recent Fox News survey of the mayoral race, conducted Oct. 10–14, asked voters about their second-choice candidate. If both Adams and Sliwa are out, the results show Mamdani keeping a significant lead, even as support for Cuomo increases. 

With Sliwa out, the poll found Mamdani would pick up 50% compared to 37% to Cuomo.

Advertisement

Yet, Cuomo on Monday said that when New Yorkers realize that Sliwa dropping out would create a head-to-head matchup with Mamdani, «they’ll discard the spoiler Curtis Sliwa and rally behind Cuomo to save the city.»

When asked who bears responsibility if Mamdani is elected mayor, Sliwa told Fox News Digital on Monday, «We blame Andrew Cuomo.»

«I would suggest to Andrew Cuomo, stop this nonsense. You are the one who is responsible for Zohran Mamdani. You got beaten mightily in a Democratic primary,» Sliwa said when asked about Cuomo calling him a «spoiler.»

Advertisement

Mamdani on Sunday responded to a viral clip of Sliwa reiterating that he will stay in the race, despite pleas from billionaires, like Ackman. 

«It’s genuinely positive for our democracy that there’s another candidate in this race who believes NYC voters should pick their next mayor, not billionaires who mostly live somewhere else,» Mamdani said in the post

CUOMO RALLIES BUSINESS LEADERS AGAINST SOCIALIST CANDIDATE AS NYC MAYORAL RACE REACHES BOILING POINT

Advertisement
sliwa and mamdani nyc debate

Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa, left, speaks while participating in a mayoral debate with Democratic candidate Zohran Mamdani, right, and independent candidate former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (not pictured), Thursday, Oct. 16, 2025, in New York.  (AP Photo/Angelina Katsanis, Pool)

Ackman and Catsimatidis are among those billionaires arguing that a vote for Sliwa is a vote for Mamdani. 

«Like that Ackman, out in Chappaqua, what does he know about New York City?» Sliwa questioned on Monday, telling reporters that billionaires «have paved the way for Zohran Mamdani because every time they fail, it makes it easier for Zohran Mamdani to campaign.»

«They should stay out of it, focus on Wall Street, hedge funds. They know nothing about the streets, as clearly evidenced by their panic,» Sliwa said, urging billionaires to «let the people decide.» 

Advertisement

«Billionaires should be ashamed of themselves for interfering with this election. I call it election interference. Let the people decide. That’s the way I was raised. That’s the way everybody was raised. Nobody was ever told the billionaires were going to pick the person who wins an election.» 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Mamdani agreed with his Republican opponent on Monday, arguing that New Yorkers «no matter what they think about our politics, want to make their own decisions, and that is one place where Curtis and I agree, which is that it’s time for New Yorkers to make this decision, not for billionaire donors to decide who gets to run this city.»

Advertisement

«To have a candidate spending all his time pleading with another candidate to get, it shows that he doesn’t have much to share with New Yorkers himself,» Mamdani said of Cuomo. 

Fox News Digital reached out to Cuomo for comment but did not immediately receive a response. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Editorial de The Times: Rusia no se detendrá hasta que la OTAN actúe

Published

on


Rusia ha lanzado una nueva y peligrosa campaña de provocación contra la OTAN.

Durante las últimas seis semanas, ha enviado drones sobre Polonia y Rumanía y ha desplegado aviones de combate en Estonia.

Advertisement

Es muy probable que Rusia también esté detrás de los vuelos con drones que interrumpieron la actividad en aeropuertos de Dinamarca, Bélgica y Alemania.

El presidente Vladímir Putin ha negado, de forma poco convincente, su responsabilidad en todos estos actos y, de hecho, parece estar contento de que el mundo crea que Rusia está detrás de ellos.

Sus objetivos son asustar, agotar y dividir a los europeos, haciéndoles cuestionar su apoyo a Ucrania y socavar sus esfuerzos por repeler la invasión rusa.

Advertisement

En última instancia, también quiere que Estados Unidos parezca débil y fragmentar la alianza de la OTAN.

Responder con prudencia es vital para Washington y Europa.

Contraatacar con dureza corre el riesgo de intensificar el conflicto, mientras que no hacer nada transmite una debilidad que invita a futuras agresiones.

Advertisement
El secretario general de la OTAN, Mark Rutte, habla durante una rueda de prensa en la sede de la Alianza en Bruselas, Bélgica, el 23 de septiembre de 2025. REUTERS/Geert Vanden Wijngaert

Los aliados de la OTAN son conscientes de que Rusia los está poniendo a prueba y, hasta ahora, han respondido eficazmente.

Han denunciado las incursiones, culpado abiertamente a Rusia de ellas y se han reunido este mes en Copenhague en una muestra de unidad.

«No estamos en guerra», declaró recientemente el canciller alemán Friedrich Merz, «pero tampoco estamos en paz».

Advertisement

Los líderes europeos deben dejar claro que la agresión rusa contra los países de la OTAN corre el riesgo de recibir una respuesta contundente, que incluye el derribo de drones —como ya ha hecho Occidente— y, potencialmente, de aviones de combate rusos que entren en el espacio aéreo de la OTAN.

Estados Unidos y sus aliados de la OTAN también deberían aprovechar la nueva agresión rusa para aumentar su apoyo a Ucrania, enviando así el mensaje de que el intento de Putin de debilitar la determinación occidental ha fracasado.

La visita del presidente ucraniano Volodymyr Zelensky a la Casa Blanca el viernes le brindó a Trump la oportunidad de comprometerse con nueva ayuda militar y económica, y debería aprovecharla.

Advertisement

Todas estas respuestas conllevan riesgos, incluyendo el peligro de una escalada.

Sin embargo, a estas alturas, el mundo debería saber que no hay opciones seguras con Putin.

Ignorar o minimizar sus agresiones las fomenta aún más.

Advertisement

Si llega a creer que puede amenazar a Polonia, Estonia y otros miembros de la OTAN sin consecuencias, se volverá más audaz al hacerlo.

«No solo debemos reaccionar, sino también disuadir», declaró Ursula von der Leyen, presidenta de la Comisión Europea.

«Porque si dudamos en actuar, la zona gris solo se ampliará».

Advertisement

Tiene razón. A veces, la mejor manera de prevenir una escalada militar es trazar una línea firme.

Provocaciones

Las últimas provocaciones rusas comenzaron el 9 de septiembre con más de una docena de drones que entraron en Polonia tras sobrevolar Bielorrusia y Ucrania.

Advertisement

Cinco días después, un dron entró en Rumanía, cerca de dos cazas rumanos que patrullaban.

Cinco días después, tres aviones MiG rusos entraron en Estonia.

Luego se produjo una misteriosa intrusión de drones civiles en aeropuertos comerciales.

Advertisement

La semana posterior al incidente de Estonia, varios drones volaron cerca de dos aeropuertos de Dinamarca en lo que el ministro de Defensa del país denominó un «ataque híbrido», y las autoridades cerraron brevemente los aeropuertos para evitar el riesgo de un accidente.

Posteriormente, los drones interrumpieron el transporte aéreo en Bélgica y Alemania.

La OTAN respondió bien a estas provocaciones.

Advertisement

Los MiG sobre Estonia crearon el problema más espinoso, ya que planteaban la posibilidad de una confrontación militar entre pilotos humanos.

Sin embargo, los pilotos suecos y finlandeses se enfrentaron a los MiG, y los pilotos rusos se retiraron, dejando a Estonia escoltada por los aviones de la OTAN.

La respuesta a los drones fue aún más agresiva.

Advertisement

Una combinación de pilotos polacos, holandeses, italianos y alemanes interceptó los drones que sobrevolaban Polonia, derribando varios de ellos.

En Rumanía, los pilotos rastrearon el dron ruso, que abandonó el espacio aéreo de la OTAN por sí solo.

Una desventaja de destruir drones es su alto costo.

Advertisement

Algunos de los misiles que utilizó la OTAN costaron un millón de dólares, mucho más que un dron.

Para abordar este problema, la OTAN debería ampliar la producción de drones armados, desarrollar defensas de guerra electrónica más eficaces contra ellos y financiar la investigación de otras contramedidas.

La agresión rusa debería servir de recordatorio de que la guerra está cambiando y que las industrias de defensa deben adaptarse a ella.

Advertisement

En cuanto a futuras intrusiones de aviones rusos pilotados, algunos países de Europa del Este abogan por flexibilizar las normas sobre cómo y cuándo los pilotos de la OTAN pueden enfrentarse a los aviones rusos que entran en el espacio aéreo de la alianza.

Una combinación de cautela y firmeza es la mejor opción.

Nadie quiere un conflicto directo entre la OTAN y Rusia, pero la historia demuestra que el uso de la fuerza puede llevar a Putin a replegarse.

Advertisement

A mediados de la década de 2010, aviones rusos sobrevolaron ocasionalmente Turquía, y Turquía, miembro de la OTAN, le ordenó a Rusia que se detuviera.

Solo después de que Turquía derribara un avión, Rusia se retiró.

También es importante responder en el escenario que más preocupa a Putin:

Advertisement

Las incursiones parecen haber sido, en parte, una reacción a la reciente ambigüedad estadounidense.

Ocurrieron menos de un mes después de una cumbre en Alaska, durante la cual Putin logró que Trump desistiera de sus esfuerzos por presionar a Rusia para que aceptara un alto el fuego en Ucrania. Europa se sintió justificadamente decepcionada.

Europa se sintió justificadamente decepcionada.

Advertisement

Aun así, si Putin creía que Alaska ofrecía una oportunidad para dividir aún más a los aliados, se equivocó.

En respuesta a las incursiones, y quizás debido a la falta de avances diplomáticos, Trump ha expresado una creciente frustración.

El mes pasado, afirmó que Putin «realmente me ha decepcionado».

Advertisement

Trump también afirmó que los aviones de la OTAN deberían derribar aeronaves rusas que entren en el espacio aéreo aliado y planteó la posibilidad de nuevas formas de apoyo a Ucrania.

Ya ha autorizado un mayor intercambio de inteligencia con Kiev para aumentar la eficacia de sus ataques, incluidos aquellos contra instalaciones de petróleo y gas rusas.

Otra opción consiste en permitir que Ucrania obtenga misiles Tomahawk.

Advertisement

Estos misiles tienen un alcance de 1.600 kilómetros y Ucrania podría usarlos para atacar zonas más profundas de Rusia.

El historial de impulsividad de Trump y su larga trayectoria de cercanía con Putin ofrecen razones para dudar de que esta nueva postura perdure.

El jueves, ambos líderes hablaron por teléfono durante más de dos horas, y Trump calificó la conversación de «muy productiva».

Advertisement

Planean reunirse próximamente en Budapest.

Esa reunión brindará la oportunidad de trazar una línea firme.

La reciente agresión de Rusia a la OTAN demuestra que la guerra rusa en Ucrania va mucho más allá de Ucrania.

Advertisement

Se trata de las ambiciones revanchistas de Putin en Europa.

La única manera de contenerlo es con fuerza y ​​determinación.

c.2025 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Hamas releases coffin of dead hostage to Red Cross, IDF confirms

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A coffin of a deceased hostage has been transferred from Hamas to the Red Cross, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said on Monday.

Advertisement

The coffin is being transferred into Red Cross’ custody and is on the way to Israeli troops  in Gaza, according to the IDF.

«Hamas is required to uphold the agreement and take the necessary steps to return all the hostages,» the IDF said on X. 

Earlier on Monday, it was announced that the remains of Nepali student Bipin Joshi, who was held hostage in Gaza, were being flown from Israel to his hometown of Bhimdattanagar.

Advertisement

US MILITARY TO OVERSEE NEXT PHASE OF PEACE DEAL FROM COORDINATION BASE IN ISRAEL

A Nepal Army personnel pays his last respects to the coffin of Bipin Joshi, a deceased Nepali student who was killed while being held hostage in Gaza, at the Tribhuvan International Airport in Kathmandu on October 20, 2025, days after it was returned from Hamas captivity under a Gaza ceasefire and hostage exchange deal. ( Prakash Mathema/AFP)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Hamas has now handed over the remains of nearly half of the 28 dead hostages in Gaza, a key step in the week-old ceasefire process meant to end two years of war. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

This is a developing story. Check back here for updates. 

Advertisement



middle east,israel,world,wars

Continue Reading

Tendencias