Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Barrett says justices ‘wear black, not red or blue’ in response to partisan critics in Fox News interview

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett pushed back against partisan portrayals of the Supreme Court, telling Fox News’ Bret Baier that justices «wear black, not red or blue» and follow the Constitution, not politics.

Advertisement

She appeared on Fox to promote her new book, «Listening to the Law,» and to address public perceptions of the Court’s work and independence.

Barrett stressed that the Court is not divided into partisan teams. She also defended its approach to presidential power, clarified misconceptions about the Dobbs decision, and reflected on her originalist judicial philosophy.

Her book touches on details such as assigned seating, courtroom traditions, and the gap between outside perception and inside reality.

Advertisement

AMY CONEY BARRETT DETAILS BATTLE BETWEEN HER OWN PERSONAL VIEWS AND THE LAW IN NEW BOOK

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett is seen during the ceremonial swearing-in on the South Lawn of the White House after her confirmation to the Supreme Court in October 2020. (Getty Images)

«You know, we don’t wear red and blue, we all wear black because judges are nonpartisan. And the idea is that we are all listening to the law. We’re all trying to get it right. We’re not playing for a team,» she told Baier. «We don’t sit on specific sides of the bench, left and right. You know, we sit in order of seniority.»

Advertisement

Barrett underscored the disconnect between public perception and the Court’s inner workings, noting:

«I often ask new law clerks what surprised you most when you started? And one of the most common answers is the difference between what’s happening on the inside and what people think is happening on the inside.»

JUSTICE BARRETT OPENS UP ABOUT ‘AWKWARD’ START ON SCOTUS, SHADOW DOCKET AND MORE IN FORTHCOMING MEMOIR

Advertisement
President Donald Trump and Justice Amy Coney Barrett

President Donald Trump, and Amy Coney Barrett, associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, stand on a balcony during a ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Monday, Oct. 26, 2020. (Ken Cedeno/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Critics on the left argue the Court is shielding former President Donald Trump, a view reflected in headlines from outlets such as The New York Times and NBC.

Barrett responded by placing the Court’s work in historical context, stressing that cases on presidential power extend beyond any one occupant of the office.

«We’re not deciding cases just for today, and we’re not deciding cases based on the president,» Barrett said. «As the current occupant of the office, we’re deciding cases about the presidency. So we’re taking each case, and we’re looking at the question of presidential power as it comes. And the cases that we decide today are going to matter.

Advertisement

JUSTICE BARRETT DEFENDS JACKSON JABS AS ‘WARRANTED’ IN RARE PUBLIC APPEARANCE

Supreme Court Justices

Justices of the US Supreme Court pose for their official photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on Oct. 7, 2022 (Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images)

«Four presidencies from now, six presidencies from now, and so on. Each of these cases that we’re getting, you know, well, I mean, some of them overlap, but many present different constitutional issues,» she added.

She stressed the Court rules on the presidency as an institution, with decisions that resonate across administrations.

Advertisement

Turning to the Dobbs decision, Barrett said the ruling did not outlaw abortion but returned the issue to the political process—a point she argued has been widely misunderstood.

«Dobbs did not say that abortion is illegal. Dobbs said it belongs to the political process,» Barrett said.

Barrett acknowledged growing threats to judges, stressing violence should not be «the cost of public service.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Returning to public perception, she said the Court must follow the law even when rulings are unpopular, stressing integrity over public opinion.

«The court… can’t take into account public opinion in making individual decisions… you have to follow the law where it leads, even if it leads in a place where the majority of people don’t want you to go,» she said.

Advertisement

supreme court,law,judiciary,federal judges

INTERNACIONAL

Kushner joins Witkoff for Gaza ceasefire talks as Trump pushes peace plan: ‘cautiously optimistic’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, has once again stepped into the geopolitical arena, landing in Egypt alongside White House Special Envoy Steve Witkoff on Wednesday to secure a ceasefire deal in Gaza. 

Advertisement

The presence of Kushner — who has largely stayed out of Trump’s White House during the president’s second term and holds no official role in the administration after previously serving as a senior advisor to Trump — signifies that the U.S. is «serious» about securing a deal between Hamas and Israel, bringing an end to the two-year-long war and returning all 48 hostages. 

A White House official told Fox News Digital that Kushner, a «major architect of the Abraham Accords,» is an «extremely trusted voice on Middle East policy» and has been in contact with Witkoff throughout the Israel-Hamas negotiations over the last year.

The official said the White House is «grateful» for his expertise as it attempts to secure a deal and end the war this week, and remains «cautiously optimistic» that an agreement will be reached. 

Advertisement

ISRAEL, HAMAS MEET IN EGYPT TO REVIVE TRUMP PEACE PLAN AHEAD OF OCT 7 ANNIVERSARY

US special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff (R) and Jared Kushner await the arrival of President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump at Teterboro Airport in Teterboro, New Jersey, on July 13, 2025.  (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)

«To bring him in now, I think, indicates that, one: the Trump administration is really determined to get some progress here. Two: they’re bringing some pretty serious firepower to make some deals,» senior fellow and Director of the Hudson Institute’s Keystone Defense Initiative, Rebeccah Heinrichs, told Fox and Friends Wednesday morning. 

Advertisement

«It’s promising that Jared is there,» Heinrichs added, noting his prominent role in securing the Abraham Accords during the first Trump administration. 

Reports on Wednesday suggested that the pair intend to remain in Egypt alongside other mediating nations, including Qatar, for as long as it takes to secure a deal. 

Their arrival marked the third day of serious negotiations after Israeli and Hamas officials convened on Monday in the Egyptian coastal resort city of Sharm El Sheikh, located at the southern tip of the Sinai Peninsula. 

Advertisement

The negotiations began after Trump late last month revealed a 20-point peace plan to end the war and return the hostages within a 72-hour window of an agreement being finalized.

TRUMP’S PEACE DEAL COULD END THE WAR IN GAZA OR NETANYAHU’S CAREER

Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin talks to U.S. President Donald Trump during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on April 7, 2025 in Washington. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Shortly after, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agreed to the terms before Trump began pushing Hamas to respond. 

Advertisement

Hamas appeared to accept the majority of the proposal over the weekend, though it flagged issues with certain elements of the 20-point blueprint, including the swift return of all the hostages, particularly the deceased hostages, some of whom it says are buried under rubble and, therefore, cannot be quickly retrieved. 

Reports also suggested Hamas took issue with the call for it to completely disarm and flagged distrust that Israel would hold up its end of the bargain by ending its military ambitions in the Gaza Strip once all the hostages are returned. 

Security experts have told Fox News Digital that Trump, after months of backing Israel’s aggressive military strategy in the Gaza Strip, is in a unique position to squeeze Netanyahu and force both sides to the negotiating table. 

Advertisement
Israel continues to hit Gaza

Smoke rises from Gaza City seen from Deir al Balah, following intense Israeli military attacks on northern Gaza, on Oct. 5, 2025.  (Khames Alrefi/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«It’s absolutely imperative for Israel’s long-term security and, frankly, for Netanyahu’s political future to keep the U.S. and Trump on side,» security expert and Randi & Charles Wax senior fellow at the Jewish Institute for National Security of America, John Hannah, told Fox News Digital. «A flat-out rejection and confrontation with the United States would have been disastrous for Netanyahu as well as for Israel.»

Netanyahu is facing a precarious political front at home with immense frustration by the public over his failure to return the hostages, but also within his own coalition, who see his negotiating with Hamas as a concession and collapse of his previous stated security aims. 

Advertisement



donald trump,white house,israel,benjamin netanyahu,middle east,world

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Comey pleads not guilty in court after indictment on alleged false statements, obstruction

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Former FBI Director James Comey pleaded not guilty to charges of allegedly making false statements and obstruction of a congressional hearing during his first court appearance in Virginia on Wednesday.

Advertisement

The former FBI director appeared at 10 a.m. ET in the Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse in Alexandria, Va. Comey’s wife, Patrice, and daughter, Maureen, were spotted waiting in line outside the courthouse Wednesday morning.

District Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, presided over the hearing. Comey’s lawyer, Patrick Fitzgerald, told Nachmanoff that representing Comey «is the honor of my life» and that his team would be filing motions alleging a vindictive and retaliatory prosecution as well as outrageous government conduct.

Nachmanoff set oral argument dates for Nov. 19 and Dec. 9 and a jury trial to begin on Jan. 5, 2026. 

Advertisement

COMEY INDICTED FOR ALLEGED FALSE STATEMENTS, OBSTRUCTION OF CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDING

Patrice Failor (L), wife of former FBI director James Comey, is embraced by her daughter Maurene Comey as they arrive at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia’s Bryan Courthouse on October 08, 2025 in Alexandria, Virginia. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The only time Comey spoke during the hearing was when the judge asked if he understood the charges against him.

Advertisement

«I do your honor,» Comey said. «Thank you very much.»

Comey was indicted in September by a federal grand jury on two counts: alleged false statements within jurisdiction of the legislative branch and obstruction of a congressional proceeding.

The indictment alleges that Comey obstructed a congressional investigation into the disclosure of sensitive information in violation of 18 USC 1505.

Advertisement

The indictment also alleges Comey made a false statement when he stated he did not authorize someone at the FBI to be an anonymous source. According to the indictment, that statement was false.

Fox News Digital exclusively reported in July that Comey was under criminal investigation by the FBI. The probe into Comey centered on whether he lied to Congress during his Sept. 30, 2020, testimony about his handling of the original Trump–Russia probe at the FBI, known inside the bureau as «Crossfire Hurricane.»

«No one is above the law,» Attorney General Pam Bondi said on X after the indictment, adding that it «reflects this Department of Justice’s commitment to holding those who abuse positions of power accountable for misleading the American people. We will follow the facts in this case.»

Advertisement
In this Wednesday, May 3, 2017, photo then-FBI Director James Comey pauses as he testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, before a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. President Donald Trump abruptly fired Comey on May 9, ousting the nation's top law enforcement official in the midst of an investigation into whether Trump's campaign had ties to Russia's election meddling.(AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Former FBI Director James Comey is seen at a hearing on Capitol Hill in 2017. (Associated Press)

COMEY DENIES CHARGES, DECLARES ‘I AM NOT AFRAID’

FBI Director Kash Patel said «previous corrupt leadership and their enablers weaponized federal law enforcement, damaging once proud institutions and severely eroding public trust.»

«Every day, we continue the fight to earn that trust back, and under my leadership, this FBI will confront the problem head-on,» Patel said. «Nowhere was this politicization of law enforcement more blatant than during the Russiagate hoax, a disgraceful chapter in history we continue to investigate and expose.»

Advertisement

He added: «Everyone, especially those in positions of power, will be held to account – no matter their perch.»

Comey, after being indicted, posted an Instagram video, denying the allegations.

«My family and I have known for years that there are costs to standing up to Donald Trump, but we couldn’t imagine ourselves living any other way,» he said. «We will not live on our knees, and you shouldn’t either. Somebody that I love dearly recently said that fear is the tool of a tyrant, and she’s right.»

Advertisement

«But I’m not afraid,» Comey added.

«My heart is broken for the Department of Justice, but I have great confidence in the federal judicial system and I am innocent, so let’s have a trial and keep the faith,» Comey said.

Fox News Digital also exclusively reported that former CIA Director John Brennan is under criminal investigation related to the Trump–Russia probe. 

Advertisement

Under federal law, prosecutors have five years to bring a charge, with the five-year mark occurring Tuesday.

TRUMP SAYS COMEY ‘PLACED A CLOUD OVER THE ENTIRE NATION’ WITH CROSSFIRE HURRICANE, REACTS TO INDICTMENT

The case is being handled by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Advertisement

The FBI opened its Trump-Russia probe in July 2016, known inside the bureau as «Crossfire Hurricane.» 

Robert Mueller, former special counsel for the U.S. Department of Justice. 

Robert Mueller, former special counsel for the U.S. Department of Justice.  (AP newsroom; Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Mike Cohen/Getty Images for The New York Times)

President Donald Trump, during his first term, fired Comey in May 2017. 

Days later, Robert Mueller was appointed special counsel to take over the FBI’s original «Crossfire Hurricane» investigation.

Advertisement

After nearly two years, former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, which concluded in March 2019, yielded no evidence of criminal conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russian officials during the 2016 presidential election.

Shortly after, John Durham was appointed as special counsel to investigate the origins of the «Crossfire Hurricane» probe.

EXCLUSIVE: FBI LAUNCHES CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS OF JOHN BRENNAN, JAMES COMEY: DOJ SOURCES

Advertisement

Durham found that the FBI «failed to act» on a «clear warning sign» that the bureau was the «target» of a Clinton-led effort to «manipulate or influence the law enforcement process for political purposes» ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

Special Counsel John Durham departs the U.S. Federal Courthouse

Fox News Digital broke a series of stories related to Special Counsel John Durham’s findings.  (Julia Nikhinson/Reuters)

«The aforementioned facts reflect a rather startling and inexplicable failure to adequately consider and incorporate the Clinton Plan intelligence into the FBI’s investigative decision-making in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation,» Durham’s report states.

«Indeed, had the FBI opened the Crossfire Hurricane investigation as an assessment and, in turn, gathered and analyzed data in concert with the information from the Clinton Plan intelligence, it is likely that the information received would have been examined, at a minimum, with a more critical eye,» the report continued.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Durham, in his report, said the FBI «failed to act on what should have been — when combined with other incontrovertible facts — a clear warning sign that the FBI might then be the target of an effort to manipulate or influence the law enforcement process for political purposes during the 2016 presidential election.»

Fox News’ Wyatt Dobrovich-Fago contributed to this report.

Advertisement

james comey,fbi,justice department,russia investigation

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Un parque marino en Canadá advierte que podría sacrificar a 30 ballenas beluga

Published

on



TORONTO — Un parque marino canadiense que cerró el año pasado quiere enviar sus 30 belugas restantes a un acuario en China.

Pero el ministro de pesca de Canadá se negó a emitir un permiso de exportación porque los animales seguirían viviendo en cautiverio.

Advertisement

Ahora, Marineland, una atracción turística otrora popular en las Cataratas del Niágara, Ontario, que dice estar al borde de la quiebra, ha amenazado con sacrificar a las ballenas si el gobierno le niega una inyección de efectivo de emergencia antes del martes.

«Si no recibimos una respuesta para esa fecha, no tendremos más remedio que presumir que las respuestas a nuestras preguntas son negativas», dijo el parque en una carta el viernes al Ministerio de Pesca, añadiendo que lo que suceda con los animales sería «una consecuencia directa de la decisión del ministro».

El Ministerio de Pesca dio su respuesta el lunes por la noche:

Advertisement

Marineland no recibirá más dinero.

Video

Belugas canadienses en peligro de ser sacrificadas

“El hecho de que Marineland no haya planeado una alternativa viable a pesar de criar estas ballenas en cautiverio durante muchos años, no pone en manos del gobierno canadiense la responsabilidad de cubrir sus gastos”, dijo la ministra de Pesca, Joanne Thompson, en una carta a Marineland.

Advertisement

Los activistas defensores del bienestar de los animales y los políticos locales han acusado al parque de estar intentando, en realidad, extorsionarlos.

Los representantes de Marineland no respondieron a las solicitudes de comentarios.

El parque cerró sus puertas al público en 2024, tras años de disminución de la asistencia y acusaciones de maltrato animal.

Advertisement

Su funcionamiento también se vio obstaculizado por una ley de protección animal promulgada por Canadá en 2019, que prohíbe la cría de ballenas y delfines en cautiverio o su uso con fines de entretenimiento.

La legislación pasó a conocerse como el proyecto de ley “Liberen a Willy”, en honor a la película de 1993.

En los últimos años, ha habido un movimiento creciente para alejarse de mantener a las ballenas y delfines cautivos en entornos cerrados.

Advertisement

Pero liberarlos simplemente no suele ser una opción.

Los mamíferos marinos criados en cautiverio tienen pocas posibilidades de sobrevivir en la naturaleza, según los expertos en animales, debido a su falta de habilidades como la caza y la interacción social con otros mamíferos.

En el apogeo de su popularidad, Marineland fue un importante destino para familias con niños pequeños, principalmente por sus espectáculos coreografiados que presentaban orcas saltando, delfines girando y morsas obedientes en una exhibición diseñada para parecerse a un castillo medieval.

Advertisement

El parque fue fundado en 1961 por John Holer, un inmigrante esloveno que decía que amaba a los animales, y la instalación eventualmente se expandió para cubrir 400 hectáreas de terreno y también incluyó atracciones y restaurantes.

Pero su reputación se desmoronó con el paso de los años a medida que Marineland enfrentaba constantes protestas de activistas defensores del bienestar animal y reclamos sobre el trato inhumano de sus animales.

Thompson declaró previamente que su decisión de denegar la solicitud de permiso de exportación de Marineland se atenía a las normas canadienses contra la explotación de mamíferos marinos. Marineland esper

Advertisement

aba enviar los animales a Chimelong Ocean Kingdom, un parque temático en Zhuhai, China.

«No podría, en conciencia, aprobar una exportación que perpetuaría el trato que han sufrido estas belugas», dijo Thompson en una declaración.

Dijo que había visitado el parque recientemente y creía que la salud de las ballenas se había deteriorado.

Advertisement

El lunes por la noche, Thompson afirmó que seguía dispuesta a revisar otras solicitudes de permisos de exportación e instó a la empresa a actuar de buena fe.

Las ballenas beluga tienen una vida útil de unos 60 años, pero tienden a tener vidas más cortas en cautiverio.

En los últimos años, 19 ballenas beluga y una orca han muerto en Marineland, según datos recopilados por The Canadian Press, que indicó que el parque aún alberga cuatro delfines y algunas focas, leones marinos y osos.

Advertisement

(Marineland fue multado en virtud de las leyes de crueldad animal de Ontario en agosto de 2024 por mantener a tres osos negros en una jaula estrecha durante meses sin suficiente agua).

“Amenazar con matar a todos sus animales si no reciben fondos de emergencia es simplemente repugnante”, dijo Melissa Matlow, asesora de bienestar animal de World Animal Protection con sede en Toronto, que ha presionado durante mucho tiempo por el traslado humanitario de las ballenas.

Elogió la decisión de evitar que las ballenas lleguen a China.

Advertisement

“Necesitamos consolarnos pensando que esta es la última generación de ballenas y delfines que tendrá que sufrir nuevamente en Canadá”, dijo Matlow.

Los activistas de la vida silvestre afirman que un santuario marino sería un lugar ideal para que las ballenas pudieran vivir el resto de sus vidas, pero este tipo de instalaciones son escasas.

Un proyecto de Nueva Escocia, llamado Proyecto Santuario de Ballenas, está lejos de hacerse realidad.

Advertisement

Una coalición de inversores privados, encabezada por Knapp Capital Management, una firma de Nueva Jersey, ha propuesto convertir la propiedad de Marineland y sus alrededores en el “primer santuario interior global del mundo” para los animales del parque.

Phil Demers, ex entrenador de morsas de Marineland, dijo que las últimas tácticas de la compañía consistieron en fanfarronería, amenazas y ultimátums, un patrón que dijo haber presenciado mientras estaba envuelto en 13 años de litigio con la compañía después de plantear públicamente sus preocupaciones sobre el trato inhumano de los animales de la instalación.

«Es un sistema de soporte vital en soporte vital», dijo Demers sobre el parque, que según él tenía una infraestructura de tratamiento de agua obsoleta.

Advertisement

Chris Bittle, miembro del Parlamento que representa a un distrito cercano a las Cataratas del Niágara, dijo:

“La postura de Marineland de ‘danos dinero o las ballenas se mueren’ es otro ejemplo de su incapacidad para asumir la responsabilidad por años de mala gestión”.

c.2025 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias