Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Boasberg orders Trump to bring back CECOT migrant class deported in March

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A federal judge on Monday ordered the Trump administration to provide due process to a class of Venezuelan migrants deported to El Salvador in March, and gave it two weeks to detail how it will do so – setting up another high-stakes clash between the White House and the federal courts.

Advertisement

In March, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ordered the Trump administration to halt its plans to immediately use the 1798 Alien Enemies Act wartime immigration law to quickly deport hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to CECOT, a Salvadoran maximum-security prison. That did not happen, and the planes landed in El Salvador hours later. 

Boasberg concluded that the Trump administration’s actions were illegal, conducted in defiance of the court, and deprived the migrants in the CECOT class of their due process protections – including prior notice of removal, a «meaningful opportunity» to contest their removal from the U.S., and the ability to dispute their designation as a member of the Tren de Aragua gang.

He ordered the Trump administration to submit to the court by Jan. 5 its plan to provide due process protections to the CECOT class – which he said the administration could do by either returning the migrants to the U.S. to have their cases heard in person, or to otherwise facilitate hearings abroad with members of the class that «satisfy the requirements of due process.»

Advertisement

«On the merits, the Court concludes that this class was denied their due-process rights and will thus require the Government to facilitate their ability to obtain such hearing,» Boasberg said Monday. «Our law requires no less.»

APPEALS COURT BLOCKS TRUMP ADMIN’S DEPORTATION FLIGHTS IN ALIEN ENEMIES ACT IMMIGRATION SUIT

Judge James E. Boasberg stands for a portrait at E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse. (Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images))

Advertisement

The Justice Department is almost certain to appeal the order.

Monday’s ruling adds new clarity to a complex immigration case that began 10 months prior, and which sparked a flurry of appeals, contempt inquiries and open questions as to the status of the CECOT plaintiffs and the ability the U.S. has to order their return.

Boasberg said Monday that the U.S. appeared to be operating with the knowledge that it had some level of constructive custody over the migrants detained at CECOT, citing the terms of an agreement made between the U.S. and El Salvador to house the migrants for at least a one-year period.

Advertisement

He also cited multiple public remarks from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and other senior DHS officials, which appear to cast CECOT as an «extension» of U.S. detention facilities.

«These statements strongly undermine the Government’s contention that El Salvador retains complete discretion over what to do with individuals» removed from the U.S., he noted.

JUDGES V TRUMP: HERE ARE THE KEY COURT BATTLES HALTING THE WHITE HOUSE AGENDA

Advertisement
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at White House

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is recognized as President Donald Trump speaks during an event in the Rose Garden at the White House. (AP/Mark Schiefelbein)

If «secretly spiriting individuals to another country were enough to neuter the Great Writ, then the Government could ‘snatch anyone off the street, turn him over to a foreign country, and then effectively foreclose any corrective course of action,’» Boasberg concluded.

The update comes after the court’s inquiry had been stalled for months, both by appeals court rulings, efforts to shield certain information from the court for national security purposes, and a separate, but related, contempt inquiry.

The CECOT migrants were again moved in July from the Salvadoran prison to Venezuela as part of a broader prisoner exchange that involved the return of at least 10 Americans detained in Venezuela. That step further complicated efforts to ascertain the status of the migrants, some of whom had fled Venezuela and were in hiding.

Advertisement

That made it difficult to contact the migrants from the CECOT class and determine how many of them still wished to proceed with their due process cases, as ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt, the lawyer representing the plaintiffs, told Boasberg in court last month. 

The ACLU said this month that, of the 252 Venezuelan migrants deported to CECOT in March, 137 of them still wished to move forward with the due process cases.

US JUDGE VOWS TO RULE ‘SOON’ ON ABREGO GARCIA’S FATE AFTER MARATHON HEARING

Advertisement
Noem stands in front of tattooed inmates at cell at El Salvador prison

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem speaks during a tour of the Terrorist Confinement Center (CECOT) on March 26, 2025. (Alex Brandon-Pool/Getty Images)

Still, the new ruling is almost certain to face fierce opposition from Trump officials, who have assailed Boasberg and other judges who have blocked or paused the president’s flurry of executive orders as «rogue, activist» judges, whom they argue are overstepping their authority.

They argue that lower court judges should not have the power to prevent the president from executing what administration officials say is a lawful agenda – though the judges in question have disagreed that the president’s actions all follow the law.

Boasberg, the chief judge for the U.S. District Court, has appeared unfazed by the new level of scrutiny. 

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

He told the Justice Department in November that he «certainly intends to determine what happened» on the day the government either intentionally or unintentionally violated his emergency order intended to halt the Alien Enemies Act removals. 

The government, he said, «can assist me to whatever degree it wishes.»

Advertisement

federal courts,politics,donald trump,immigration,judiciary,national security,supreme court

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Minnesota Dem Senate candidate faces call from opponent to apologize over viral ‘pandering’ hijab video

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Minnesota Republican senatorial candidate David Hann is calling on one of his potential Democratic opponents to apologize after a video of her wearing a hijab and supporting the Somali community amidst a massive fraud scandal went viral on social media.

Advertisement

«It’s emblematic of the way she and other Democrat politicians in Minnesota have behaved over the past decade or so. They’re very political,» said former Minnesota state Sen. David Hann, who is running for Senate in the Republican primary, of Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan’s video wearing a hijab and defending the Somali community amid a massive fraud scandal that has rocked Minnesota over the past several years.

«They just are pandering to political constituencies, and they’re not doing the job that they were elected to do.»

In the video, which was widely criticized by conservatives on social media last week, Flanagan can be seen donning a hijab while talking to Somali constituents.

Advertisement

MINNESOTA GOP LAWMAKERS CITE CONSTITUTION IN CALL FOR WALZ TO RESIGN OVER FRAUD CRISIS

Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan is facing backlash over a viral video defending Somalis amid a massive fraud scandal. (Getty)

«Salam alaikum,» Flanagan says in the video giving an Arabic greeting before saying, «The Somali community is part of the fabric of the state of Minnesota.»

Advertisement

«I am here shopping today and just encouraging other folks to show up, support our Somali businesses, support our immigrant neighbors, and I know that things are scary right now,» Flanagan added in the video that was aired on Somali TV.

«Being part of Minnesota and growing up here, the Somali community has always been a part of my Minnesota,» Flanagan added, while telling residents to «show up and support our Somali businesses and our immigrant neighbors.»

 «We’ve got your back,» Flanagan said. 

Advertisement

Flanagan, who has not spoken out in response to the viral investigation from journalist Nick Shirley highlighting the alleged fraud problem in Minnesota, faced criticism over the video from those who accused her of downplaying the scandal.

MEDIA ‘COMPLICITY’ BLAMED AS FEDS SAY MINNESOTA FRAUD CRISIS COULD REACH $9B: ‘SHOWN THEIR TRUE COLORS’

«This is what political performance looks like — symbolism over accountability — while billions in taxpayer dollars vanish,» Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham posted on X. «Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan wears hijab in solidarity with Somalis as feds probe multibillion-dollar fraud scandal.»

Advertisement

Hann told Fox News Digital that Flanagan should apologize for and retract the video.

«They did not do their duty out of concern that they would offend a political constituency,» Hann said. «So they haven’t done anything to take responsibility for what the public expects them to do. So yes, she should apologize.»

«She certainly should not be sent to Washington to oversee federal dollars being spent. But it’s emblematic of the way Democrats have governed in this state. They like to posture, they like to tell people how compassionate they are. They tell us our high taxes are helping people, but they really haven’t demonstrated a concern for helping people. They’re more interested in just spending.»

Advertisement

Fox News Digital has extensively reported in recent weeks on the Minnesota fraud scandal, including concerns that the fear of being called «racist» helped provide cover for the fraud, which primarily occurred within the state’s Somali community.

LAWMAKERS PROBE SBA LOANS LINKED TO MINNESOTA’S $9B FRAUD SCANDAL: ‘RECKLESS DECISION MAKING’

Flanagan and Walz

Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan speaks as Gov. Tim Walz, right, listens. (Aaron Lavinsky/Star Tribune via Getty Images)

«The Somali voting block is significant in the Minneapolis area, of course, and they’re concerned about that,» Hann told Fox News Digital. «And yes, I’ve seen those reports as well, that there were concerns about how this would appear. Most of the fraud was conducted by Somalis who put up these shell companies and looted the public treasury and I think the Democrats were concerned that if they went after that, they would appear to be picking on the Somali community when, in fact, they needed to enforce the law.»

Advertisement

«I think every community wants to see the laws enforced and people in Minnesota want to see laws enforced. And this is why this is so terrible. They are just failing to do the duty that they were elected to do.»

The lieutenant governor, who has been in office since 2019, is challenging two other Democratic candidates in the Senate primary race to fill the seat of outgoing Democratic Sen. Tina Smith. Former Democratic presidential candidate and current Sen. Amy Klobuchar serves as the other senator from the state.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Flanagan spokesperson Alexandra Fetissoff said the focus should be on the Trump administration’s efforts to deport illegal immigrants in Minnesota.

Advertisement

«While the Lt. Governor was showing her support for small businesses and communities being terrorized by ICE, she was handed a scarf by a friend and briefly wore it out of respect,» Fetissoff said. «The real outrage should not be a scarf, but masked men throwing American citizens into vans and violating the constitution.»

Flanagan’s team also clarified that while many on social media have claimed she said Somalis «built» Minnesota, «she does not say that in the video.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
David Hann

Senate candidate David Hann speaks to Fox News Digital in a 2024 interview when he was chair of the Minnesota GOP. (Fox News Digital)

Last week, Fox News Digital first reported on legislation introduced by GOP Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks named after Tim Walz that is aimed at addressing future fraud like what has occurred in Minnesota and could total as much as $9 billion, according to federal prosecutors.

If elected to the Senate, Hann told Fox News Digital he would push for more «safeguards.»

«But I think we should also be looking at, how can we reform the whole welfare establishment?» Hann explained. 

Advertisement

«Are there better ways to help people? We should be more concerned about trying to make sure people’s lives are improved, rather than just spending money. It seems to me that the Waltz administration has been focused on just handing out money, Democrats in Washington just hand out the money and no accountability and no attempt to figure out the effectiveness of the programs that we have, we need to take a hard look at that.»

Fox News Digital’s Preston Mizell contributed to this report.

Advertisement

minnesota fraud exposed,politics,minnesota

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Eurostar forced to cancel all services to and from London after ‘major disruption’ in Channel Tunnel

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The international high-speed passenger rail service that connects the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands was forced to cancel all services to and from London after experiencing a «major disruption.»

Advertisement

«Eurostar services to and from London are suspended until further notice due to overhead power supply issues in the Channel Tunnel, followed by a failed LeShuttle train,» Eurostar said in a statement emailed to Fox News Digital. 

«We advise our customers to rebook their journey for another day, with free exchanges available,» the statement added. «We apologize for the disruption and will continue to keep customers updated with the latest information.»

YOUR HOLIDAY TRAVEL PLANS COULD BE RUINED IF YOU WEAR ONE PARTICULAR ITEM TO THE AIRPORT

Advertisement

Travelers queue for Eurostar services at St. Pancras International station in London, Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2025. (Alberto Pezzali/AP Photo)

Eurotunnel said that «LeShuttle service resumed very gradually» just before 3:00 p.m. CET. The company noted that service was «operating alternatively in both directions with significant delays.» Shuttles will be added Tuesday evening and Wednesday morning.

Eurostar told Fox News Digital that its services to and from London would resume at approximately 6:00 p.m. GMT. The company is urging travelers to rebook their trips, as the power issues are still impacting service. 

Advertisement

«As the overhead power supply issues in the Channel Tunnel still remain, only one line is available to run trains on. This means there will continue to be delays and longer journey times than usual this evening,» Eurostar said in a statement. 

Customers whose trains have been canceled are advised not to come to the station, as those trains are not slated to be reinstated. 

Eurostar told Fox News Digital that passengers whose travel has been canceled can, within three months of their original travel date, choose from a variety of compensation options. This includes a free exchange for a ticket on another day or an e-voucher for the unused ticket that will be valid for 12 months. Additionally, they may request refunds for their unused tickets.

Advertisement

Passengers who were left stranded by the disruption are eligible to have Eurostar cover a variety of expenses, including hotel accommodations up to approximately $199 per room, per night, taxi costs of up to around $70 per journey and food and drink expenses up to approximately $47 per person, per day.

Passengers wait after Eurostar suspends service

Passengers wait after a Eurostar spokesperson said they were suspending its cross-Channel train services to and from London until further notice following a power supply problem in the Channel Tunnel that links Britain and France, at St. Pancras International station in London, Britain, Dec. 30, 2025. (Maja Smiejkowska/Reuters)

MILLIONS AFFECTED AS MAJOR AIRLINE ENDS ADVANTAGE MILES PROGRAM ON BASIC ECONOMY TICKETS

Earlier on Tuesday, Eurostar issued a warning to travelers to postpone their journeys due to a power supply issue. The company said passengers could see severe delays and last-minute cancellations as a result. Customers were instructed not to go to the station unless they already had a ticket, according to the BBC.

Advertisement

The U.K.’s National Rail issued a similar statement urging passengers to postpone their travel amid delays and cancellations between London St. Pancras International and Paris Nord, the BBC reported.

«An incident related to the power supply to trains occurred last night in part of the Channel Tunnel, affecting train and shuttle traffic. A technical intervention is required, which is currently underway,» Eurotunnel said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital. «The service is temporarily suspended in both directions.»

Eurostar told Fox News Digital that no passengers were stranded in the tunnel and that the broken shuttle, known as LeShuttle, had been removed.

Advertisement

LeShuttle, which is separate from Eurostar’s passenger-only rail service, runs between Folkestone, U.K., and Calais, France, bringing passengers and their vehicles through the Channel Tunnel in just 35 minutes.

Passengers wait in front of a train in Pairs

People gather near a Eurostar train at Gare du Nord station, after Eurostar announced a power supply problem in the Channel Tunnel that links Britain and France, in Paris, France, Dec. 30, 2025. (Stephanie Lecocq/Reuters)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

London North Eastern Railway (LNER) told Fox News Digital that customers with tickets for Dec. 30 whose travel was affected by the Eurostar disruption could travel to their home station on an alternative LNER train for no additional fee.

Advertisement

«Any LNER customers who have had to abandon their journey in London King’s Cross are able to return to their home station on the next available LNER service at no additional cost,» LNER told Fox News Digital. «LNER customers who choose to defer their Eurostar travel to a different day may use their existing LNER ticket to travel on that same day.»

In response to a request for comment, National Rail referred Fox News Digital to Eurostar’s media center.

LeShuttle did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

Advertisement



world,travel,holiday occasions lifestyle,united kingdom,france,europe

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Gustavo Petro anuncia un aumento histórico del salario mínimo en Colombia y desata una lluvia de críticas en plena campaña electoral

Published

on


El presidente de Colombia, Gustavo Petro, anunció este lunes un aumento sin precedentes del 23,7% del «salario mínimo vital», que fue fijado para 2026 en dos millones de pesos (unos 535 dólares), el mayor de este siglo. La decisión, con la que el gobierno promete mejorar la calidad de vida de la población, desató enseguida una lluvia de críticas desde el sector empresarial, que califica la medida de insostenible.

La decisión de Petro agitó el escenario político cuando ya comienza a acelerarse la carrera por las elecciones presidenciales de mayo de 2026. Desde todo el arco político surgieron fuertes reacciones. Analistas y políticos opositores advirtieron que se trata de una medida sin base técnica y que al parecer busca contrarrestar la imagen negativa del presidente de izquierda, que llega al final de su mandato muy desgastado y con una imagen en franca caída, luego de varias oleadas de protestas en contra de su gobierno en los últimos dos años.

Advertisement

«Pasamos a un salario mínimo vital familiar de 1.746.882 pesos (unos 468 dólares), que implica un crecimiento respecto a este año, que aún no termina, de 22,7%», a lo que se suman cerca de 250.000 pesos (unos 67 dólares) de subsidio de transporte, lo que da dos millones de pesos, anunció el mandatario en un mensaje al país.

Gustavo Petro, el lunes, durante una ceremonia de ascensos militares en Bogotá. Foto: EFE

Se trata del mayor aumento salarial de los últimos 25 años. El anterior más alto se registró en 2023 (16%).

«Con estas medidas pensamos disminuir la desigualdad» aunque «va a haber una presión sobre los precios», admitió Petro en su discurso junto al ministro de Trabajo, Antonio Sanguino.

Advertisement

Según el presidente, «el incremento se calculó no solo con base en indicadores como inflación y productividad, sino en otros que permitieron un aumento más justo y con los que se garantizarán mejores condiciones de vida para los trabajadores y sus familias».

El aumento del 23,7% del salario mínimo fue fijado de manera unilateral por el gobierno luego de que fracasaran las negociaciones tripartitas con representantes de los empresarios y de los sindicatos.

«De ahora en adelante que Colombia hable no solo de salario mínimo, sino de un salario mínimo vital familiar, y así hicimos las cuentas», subrayó Petro, quien mencionó incluso la Encíclica ‘Rerum Novarum’, promulgada en 1891 por el papa León XIII.

Advertisement

Críticas

Varios economistas advierten que el aumento podría tener impactos negativos sobre la inflación, la informalidad y el costo de vida, en alza en el país.

«Un aumento muy por encima de la inflación es un empujón que no es duradero porque se transmite en más inflación, con un efecto macroeconómico que desestabilizaría la economía colombiana», dijo a la AFP Jorge Restrepo, profesor de economía de la Universidad Javeriana.

Advertisement

En Colombia se estima una inflación en torno al 4% para el año próximo, según el Banco de la República (central). Otras estimaciones hablan de algo más de 5%.

Una protesta contra el gobierno de Gustavo Petro, en Bogotá, en 2024. El presidente termina su mandato en 2026. Foto: EFE  Una protesta contra el gobierno de Gustavo Petro, en Bogotá, en 2024. El presidente termina su mandato en 2026. Foto: EFE

Cerca al 50% de los trabajadores colombianos, que en su mayoría tiene empleos informales, no llegan a ganar un salario mínimo, de acuerdo con cifras del departamento de estadística estatal DANE.

Rechazo en el mundo empresarial

Los empresarios también alzaron su voz contra este aumento salarial. «Como resultado de una decisión unilateral del gobierno, se generan grandes riesgos para los hogares y la economía colombiana especialmente los relacionados con el efecto sobre la inflación y los precios de múltiples bienes y servicios, el empleo, y hasta las finanzas públicas», manifestó en un comunicado el presidente de la Asociación Nacional de Empresarios de Colombia (ANDI), Bruce Mac Master.

Advertisement

El dirigente agregó: «La inflación es, sin duda, una de las variables que más afecta a los ciudadanos más vulnerables», y señaló que «en un momento en el cual el gobierno nos ha dicho que se encuentra en ‘emergencia económica’ se estima que cada 1% de incremento salarial genera 400.000 millones de pesos (unos 107.000 millones de dólares) de gasto de público adicional».

Por su parte, el presidente de la Federación Nacional de Comerciantes (Fenalco), Jaime Alberto Cabal, manifestó que el aumento del salario mínimo para 2026 muy por encima de la inflación, traerá consecuencias negativas también para el empleo.

«Este acto irresponsable que ha cometido el gobierno nacional, de subir desorbitadamente el salario mínimo sin antecedentes, muchas veces más que la inflación, va a traer consecuencias gravísimas para la economía y para los propios trabajadores que se van a ver amenazados por los altos costos de esos empleos», lo que acabará incrementando la informalidad.

Advertisement

Por su parte, Fabio Arias, presidente del sindicato Central Unitaria de Trabajadores -uno de los más grandes de Colombia- acusó a los empresarios de lamentar que «al pueblo trabajador le pueda llegar a ir bien».


El incremento acumulado del salario mínimo bajo el mandato de Petro en los últimos tres años fue del 42,4%, según el Ministerio de Hacienda.

La economía nacional supera las proyecciones de los analistas, que esperan una subida en el PBI de entre 2,6 y 2,7% hacia final de año.

Advertisement

La semana pasada, Petro declaró estado de emergencia económica por 30 días ante una «inminente crisis fiscal», tras llamados de atención de organismos internacionales al Ejecutivo izquierdista por la salud fiscal del país.

Continue Reading

Tendencias