Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Bukele mocks Abrego Garcia’s torture claims with prison highlight reel

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

El Salvador President Nayib Bukele has released a video highlight reel showing Kilmar Abrego Garcia apparently thriving during his imprisonment, in an attempt to refute the migrant’s claims that he was tortured while in custody.

Advertisement

Abrego Garcia, who a judge ruled was erroneously deported by the Trump administration to El Salvador and then returned after a court order, is seen in the video gardening, playing soccer, fishing and enjoying other leisurely activities while imprisoned in his home country.

The video appears at odds with Abrego Garcia’s claims in legal filings that he was severely beaten, deprived of sleep and psychologically tortured while detained.

Abrego Garcia was first held at the country’s Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, a notorious anti-terrorism prison, in March and then transferred to a lower-security facility in Santa Ana in mid-April. Bukele does not say which prison the footage was taken from.

Advertisement

According to court documents, Abrego Garcia’s physical condition deteriorated quickly upon arrival at CECOT and within two weeks, he lost roughly 31 pounds. 

El Salvador President Nayib Bukele has released a video highlight reel showing Kilmar Abrego Garcia apparently thriving during his imprisonment, in an attempt to refute the migrant’s claims that he was tortured while in custody. (Fox News; @nayibbukelefox News; @nayibbukele)

ABREGO GARCIA SAYS HE ENDURED BEATINGS, TORTURE IN SALVADORAN PRISON AHEAD OF CRIMINAL TRIAL

Advertisement

But Bukele pushed back against those claims on Thursday, claiming he actually put on weight and released video evidence to refute claims of torture. 

The video shows Abrego Garcia in seemingly good spirits, playing chess and soccer, working out with fellow inmates, doing gardening and relaxing while watching a widescreen television in his cell, among other leisurely activities. 

«If he’d been tortured, sleep-deprived, and starved, why does he look so well in every picture?» Bukele wrote on X. «Why would he gain weight? Why are there no bruises, or even dark circles under his eyes?»

Advertisement
Sen. Van Hollen and Kilmar Abrego Garcia in El Salvador

Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-MD, meets with Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia (L) at an undisclosed location on April 17, 2025, in San Salvador, El Salvador.  (Sen. Van Hollen’s Office via Getty Images)

«The man wasn’t tortured, nor did he lose weight. In fact, photos show he gained weight while in detention. There’s plenty of footage from different days, including his meeting with Senator Van Hollen, who himself confirmed the man seemed fine.»

Bukele went on to rip the mainstream media for seemingly believing the claims.

TRUMP’S REMARKS COULD COME BACK TO BITE HIM IN ABREGO GARCIA DEPORTATION BATTLE

Advertisement

«Apparently, anything a criminal claims is accepted as truth by the mainstream media and the crumbling Western judiciary,» Bukele wrote.

Under Bukele’s state of emergency, the government has detained more than 1% of the Central American nation’s population in its war on the country’s gangs. The president has turned what was once the most dangerous country in the world — with a homicide rate of 103 per 100,000 people in 2015 — into one of the safest in the Western Hemisphere, with 1.9 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2024. The U.S. rate was 5.5 per 100,000 people in 2023, which are the most recent records available.

Trump shakes Bukele's hand in Oval Office

President Donald Trump, right, shakes the hand of El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Monday, April 14, 2025.  (Pool via AP)

Hundreds of people have died in the El Salvador prisons, according to the Associated Press, citing human rights groups, which have also documented cases of torture and deteriorated conditions.

Advertisement

Abrego Garcia, who was living in Maryland after coming to the U.S. illegally, was deported to El Salvador in March 2025. He became a prominent face of the Democrats’ resistance to the Trump administration’s mass deportation plans. 

The Trump administration accuses him of being an MS-13 gang member, a human trafficker and a serial domestic abuser amid police reports by his wife that he used violence against her. 

Trump holds up photo of Abrego Garcia's tattoos

President Donald Trump in the Oval Office holding a photo of the tattoos on Abrego Garcia’s knuckles that the White House says are affiliated with the MS-13 terrorist group. (Donald Trump TRUTH Social)

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Abrego Garcia’s lawyers claimed when he arrived at the prison he was immediately frog-marched to his cell by prison guards, who kicked him with boots and struck him with wooden batons along the way, leaving visible bumps and bruises across his body. 

He and other detainees in the cell slept on metal mattresses, with minimal access to food and satiation. They were also forced to kneel for approximately nine hours, from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m., «with guards striking anyone who fell from exhaustion,» per the filings. 

They claim he was also psychologically tortured and received threats of violence during his time at CECOT where prison guards repeatedly told him they would transfer him to other prison cells housing violent gang members, whom they assured him would «tear» him apart.

Advertisement

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said previously that when Trump declared the violent gang a terrorist organization, Abrego Garcia was no longer eligible for any form of immigration relief in the United States prompting his deportation. 

Fox News’ Breanne Deppisch and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Obama Presidential Center deposits just $1M into $470M reserve fund aimed to protect taxpayers

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

When the Obama Foundation snagged a sweetheart deal to build its beleaguered Obama Presidential Center on a Chicago public park, it pledged to create a $470 million reserve fund to spare taxpayers should the project ever go belly up.

Advertisement

But new tax filings show the foundation has only deposited $1 million into the fund and has not added to it in years, with critics saying the empty promise could potentially leave Chicagoans on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars.

Under its agreement with the city, the foundation was required to create the fund, known as an endowment, in order to take control of the sprawling 19.3-acre section of Jackson Park — often described as Chicago’s Central Park equivalent — where the complex is now slowly rising. 

The foundation ultimately secured the public land for just $10 in 2018, under a 99-year deal.

Advertisement

Former President Barack Obama is pictured next to construction of the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago, Illinois, a project facing delays, soaring costs and mounting scrutiny over its finances. (Scott Olson/Getty Images; REUTERS/Vincent Alban)

OBAMA LIBRARY, BEGUN WITH LOFTY DEI GOALS, NOW PLAGUED BY $40M RACIALLY CHARGED SUIT, BALLOONING COSTS

But when former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama turned the sod at the site in September 2021, just $1 million — or 0.21% of the pledged funds — had been deposited into the endowment, and that figure has remained unchanged ever since.

Advertisement

With construction progressing at a snail’s pace and costs ballooning from an original estimate of $330 million to at least $850 million, the lack of progress on the promised endowment has fueled fears the Obama Presidential Center could leave taxpayers holding the can if finances spiral into the red.

It comes as the Obama Foundation’s latest tax return shows its finances under strain with revenue swinging wildly year to year, fundraising shortfalls and unfulfilled donor pledges.

On news that the endowment has largely remained unfunded, Illinois GOP Chair Kathy Salvi slammed the project as an «abomination» while blasting Democrats for potentially exposing taxpayers with the deal.

Advertisement

«It should come as no surprise that the Obama Center is potentially leaving Illinois taxpayers high and dry — it’s an Illinois Democrat tradition,» Salvi told Fox News Digital in a statement. «Democrats in this state, when not going to prison for corruption, treat taxpayers like a personal piggy bank giving sweetheart deals to their political benefactors.»

The Obama Presidential Center in July 2025.

The Obama Presidential Center under construction in July. (Fox News Digital)

Scholar sounds alarm

Richard Epstein, a University of Chicago law professor emeritus and a New York University law professor, has raised concerns about the endowment for years and advised the local nonprofit Protect Our Parks with legal challenges to try to stop the Obama Center’s construction. 

Epstein argues the foundation’s failure to fund its endowment confirms his long-held view that the city never should have signed over the large section of Jackson Park. 

Advertisement

«They put a million dollars into a $400 million endowment, so it’s endowed. That gets you in jail as a securities matter,» Epstein told Fox News Digital. «An endowment means that you have the money in hand… But they have nothing. They just have the same $1 million that they put in in 2021 as far as I can tell. So I regard this as something of a public calamity.»

An endowment is a pot of money meant to earn enough interest each year to cover operating costs without touching the principle in order to avoid the taxpayer stepping in. 

«Without an endowment, they’ll have to scramble every year to cover $30 million in operating costs,» Epstein said. «The whole point of an endowment is to avoid that volatility. They just haven’t endowed it. Of that I’m 100% sure.»

Advertisement

Epstein argues that if the foundation or center falters, the public could be saddled with traffic rerouting costs, environmental impacts, or even the bill for an incomplete building.

«Nobody knows exactly who is responsible for what if the project is abandoned or incomplete,» Epstein said. «There is a risk that the public will then have to bear that loss because the foundation won’t have the money.»

Epstein said the city has effectively looked the other way, declaring the foundation «compliant» on the endowment despite only $1 million ever being deposited. Proof, he argues, that officials never intended to enforce the requirement.

Advertisement

The Obama Foundation told Fox News Digital that it will be making «significant investments in the endowment in the coming years» as it has been prioritizing fundraising for the center and leadership programs. 

«The Obama Presidential Center is fully funded and it will open in the spring of 2026,» a spokesperson for the foundation said. 

CharityWatch, a nonprofit watchdog, told Fox News Digital that the foundation technically complied with its agreement by creating an endowment because the deal never set a dollar figure. The group also said that the foundation remains «well-funded» overall while also acknowledging the pledge risks, volatility and lack of a real endowment.

Advertisement
Aerial view of Obama Presidential Center construction in Jackson Park, Chicago.

An aerial view shows construction of the Obama Presidential Center in Jackson Park, Chicago, Illinois, where costs have soared and questions remain about the project’s funding. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

While the foundation’s agreement with the city required it to create an endowment, it did not specify an amount. The $470 million figure was being reported on as the city council deliberated on the deal and the foundation committed to that sum in its 2020 annual report.

In 2021 documents, the foundation said that first-year operating costs would be as much as $40 million. By that math, the center would actually need an endowment of between $800 million to $1 billion to fund operations without tapping the principle.

It’s also unclear how much revenue the foundation expects to generate each year.

Advertisement

Epstein said the lack of funds has long been the project’s Achilles heel. Without the endowment it promised, the project’s financial underpinning remains shaky, he said.

CHICAGO RESIDENTS CALL OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER A ‘MONSTROSITY,’ FEAR THEY’LL BE DISPLACED: REPORT

Despite financial pressures, the Obama Foundation has already spent about $600 million constructing the center, which aims to honor former President Barack Obama’s political career and be a civic hub. It consists of a 225-foot-tall museum, a digital library, conference facilities, a gymnasium and a regulation-sized NBA court. It will also house the Obama Foundation.

Advertisement

The new tax filings show the foundation ended 2024 with $116.5 million in cash, down nearly $80 million from the year before, while still owing about $234 million in construction costs. Of the funding gap, $216 million comes from firm pledges — promises of future donations — while another $201 million is tied up in conditional pledges that may never materialize if benchmarks aren’t met. 

Epstein said the foundation’s financial assurances ring hollow, because a large chunk of the money it counts on is tied up in pledges and credit rather than cash in hand — leaving the center vulnerable to donor fatigue and year-to-year uncertainty.

WATCH: The Brian Kilmeade Show: Obama Presidential Center rocked by $40M racial bias lawsuit

Advertisement

Public trust doctrine

In the Protect Our Parks lawsuit, Epstein argued that handing Jackson Park to the Obama Foundation violated the public trust doctrine — which bars cities from giving away public land without a clear public benefit. The plaintiffs said the city gave away land worth nearly $200 million without securing enforceable returns for taxpayers.

However, U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey, an Obama appointee, dismissed the case in 2019, ruling that the Obama Center qualified as a public use and that courts should defer to the city’s determination. The Seventh Circuit upheld the dismissal in 2020 and various other challenges by the plaintiffs have also failed on the public trust doctrine argument.

Epstein now points to the foundation’s failure to fund its promised endowment as proof the project never truly met the public benefit test and that a core part of his argument was valid.

Advertisement

As well as not being able to fill the endowment, the foundation is also financing a $250 million revolving credit line that it has yet to draw down but is costing the foundation hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual fees, according to the tax filings.

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker (L) joins former U.S. President Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama in a ceremonial groundbreaking

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker (L) joins former U.S. President Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama in a ceremonial groundbreaking at the Obama Presidential Center in Jackson Park on Sept. 28, 2021 in Chicago, Illinois. At the time, around $1 million was in the endowment and it has remained relatively the same since.  ( Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Easing oversight

Epstein argues the endowment shortfall is just one example of how the project has skirted safeguards.

Its 99-year deal with the city was rebranded as a «use agreement,» instead of a land lease, a legal pivot that he said let the city sidestep public-trust oversight and other regulatory checks. 

Advertisement

The move grew out of an earlier fight over filmmaker George Lucas’s bid to build a Museum of Narrative Art on the lakefront. In 2016, a federal judge ruled the city’s plan to hand Lucas a 99-year lease of public parkland violated the public trust doctrine, sending Lucas packing for Los Angeles.

When the Obama Foundation arrived the following year, city officials adopted the new user agreement label. The terms were effectively the same — exclusive control for nearly a century in exchange for $10 — but by calling it a «use agreement,» the city claimed it no longer triggered the same scrutiny.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Advertisement

Epstein called it a textbook case of bending the rules. «You can’t get out of a government regulatory relationship by changing the name on something,» he said.

Epstein said the foundation’s finances have never been fully scrutinized and his team was never allowed to examine the center’s internal records — from construction contracts to day-to-day statements — leaving the true state of its fundraising and shrouded in secrecy.

«They’ve gotten a free pass on both the environmental side and the financial side,» Epstein said. «Unless somebody cracks open the books, nobody really knows if they can actually fund this project. And if they can’t, it’s the public that will be left holding the bag.»

Advertisement

The offices of Mayor Brandon Johnson, Gov. J.B. Pritzker, the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Party of Illinois did not respond to requests for comment.

barack obama,politics,chicago,democratic party,republicans,museums exhibits,education,presidential,michelle obama,law

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Alerta en Venezuela: afirman que EE.UU. prepara ataques contra narcos dentro del país caribeño

Published

on


El Ejército de Estados Unidos prepara planes para atacar a narcotraficantes dentro de territorio de Venezuela dentro de unas semanas, según adelantó este viernes la cadena NBC News citando dos funcionarios estadounidenses anónimos cercanos al asunto en la Casa Blanca.

NBC cita también a otras dos personas, cuyos nombres no revela, pero remarca que manejan información de planes para bombardear a traficantes de drogas en Venezuela, una acción que supondría una tremenda escalada en una situación ya de por sí muy tensa ante el nutrido despliegue militar que ha realizado Washington en el sur del Caribe desde este pasado verano.

Advertisement

Aunque los ataques podrían suceder en pocas semanas, el presidente Donald Trump aún no ha aprobado ninguna decisión, aseguraron esa fuentes. Pero detallaron que trabajan en ofensivas con drones contra individuos concretos y laboratorios de drogas.

El Gobierno Trump ha dicho que el contingente estadounidense, compuesto por destructores, buques de transporte anfibio, un submarino de propulsión nuclear o aviones de combate, ha destruido ya cuatro narcolanchas en aguas del Caribe que partieron supuestamente de Venezuela con drogas a bordo.

La administración no ha aportado pruebas de que hubiera drogas en todas esas embarcaciones. Sin embargo, un funcionario en República Dominicana, junto con uno de la embajada de Estados Unidos en ese país, declaró en una conferencia de prensa el domingo que se encontraron drogas en el agua después de un ataque.

Advertisement

Video

Donald Trump anunció un nuevo ataque contra una lancha en Venezuela

Según el informe de NBC, dos fuentes y un funcionario adicional familiarizado con las conversaciones afirmaron que la reciente escalada militar de Estados Unidos se debe en parte a que el presidente venezolano, Nicolás Maduro, “no está haciendo lo suficiente”, para detener el flujo de drogas ilegales que salen de su país.

Además, Washington acusa al régimen de Nicolás Maduro de integrar la cúpula del Cartel de los Soles, una organización de la que apenas existe documentación y que según la Casa Blanca envía cargamentos de droga a EE.UU.

Advertisement

Estados Unidos ha desplegado recientemente al menos ocho buques con más de 4.000 efectivos en aguas de la región y ha enviado aviones de combate F-35 a Puerto Rico, según el ejército estadounidense. «No se pueden mover tantos recursos allí sin considerar todas las opciones», afirmó una de las fuentes de NBC.


Por su parte, Venezuela considera que el operativo militar en el Caribe solo busca ejercer presión para apartar al chavismo del poder.

Video

Nicolás Maduro convocó a un simulacro ante un posible conflicto armado en Venezuela

Advertisement


Maduro escribió recientemente una carta a Trump pidiendo retomar el diálogo con el enviado especial de EE.UU., Richard Grenell, y apartar de los asuntos bilaterales al secretario de Estado, Marco Rubio, al que Caracas considera un elemento tóxico en los intercambios.

Trump le quitó peso a la misiva recientemente, y al ser preguntado por la posibilidad de ataques en territorio venezolano, se limitó a decir «bueno, ya lo descubrirán».

Al ser preguntado sobre la posibilidad de ataques estadounidenses en su país, Aníbal Sánchez Ismayel, analista político venezolano, declaró a NBC News en un mensaje de WhatsApp: «Un ataque en suelo venezolano tendría consecuencias que van desde protestas diplomáticas hasta un aumento de la persecución política de quienes clasifican como colaboradores, y una mayor unidad de la población en la necesidad de defender la soberanía reafirmada».

Advertisement
El destructor lanzamisiles estadounidense Sampson, ubicado esta semana en Panamá. Foto: Martin Bernetti/Agence France-Presse

En 2020, durante el primer mandato de Trump, el Departamento de Justicia acusó a Maduro de narcotráfico. El gobierno de Trump ha acusado a Maduro de colaborar con cárteles que, según afirma, envían cocaína, fentanilo y pandilleros a Estados Unidos. Recientemente, el gobierno aumentó la recompensa estadounidense por el arresto de Maduro a 50 millones de dólares. Venezuela no es un productor significativo de cocaína, pero se considera un importante punto de salida para vuelos que transportan la droga a otros lugares.

Estados Unidos y Venezuela, con negociaciones en Medio Oriente

Algunos funcionarios de la administración Trump están decepcionados porque la escalada militar de Estados Unidos no parece haber debilitado el control de Maduro sobre el poder ni haber provocado una respuesta significativa, afirmó el funcionario. La Casa Blanca ha enfrentado más resistencia de la que anticipaba por los ataques contra los barcos narcotraficantes, lo que ha llevado a la administración a reflexionar cuidadosamente sobre los próximos pasos.

Advertisement
El líder del régimen en Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, junto al ministro de Defensa, Vladimir Padrino López. Foto: EFEEl líder del régimen en Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, junto al ministro de Defensa, Vladimir Padrino López. Foto: EFE

Esto incluye conversaciones entre Estados Unidos y Venezuela a través de líderes de Medio Oriente que actúan como intermediarios, según ha podido saber NBC News. Según un alto funcionario de la administración, Maduro ha hablado con esos intermediarios sobre las concesiones que estaría dispuesto a hacer para mantenerse en el poder.

El alto funcionario no especificó qué países actúan como intermediarios, salvo afirmar que son aliados. Trump está “dispuesto a utilizar todos los elementos del poder estadounidense para impedir que las drogas lleguen a nuestro país y llevar a los responsables ante la justicia”, dijo el alto funcionario de la administración. CNN había informado previamente que Trump estaba considerando varias opciones, incluyendo posibles ataques estadounidenses en Venezuela.

El gobierno venezolano no respondió de inmediato a una solicitud de comentarios. Maduro ha negado previamente cualquier implicación en el narcotráfico y ha alegado repetidamente que Estados Unidos intenta derrocarlo.

A principios de este mes, Maduro envió una carta a Trump para iniciar un diálogo, según una publicación del gobierno venezolano en redes sociales. La secretaria de prensa de la Casa Blanca, Karoline Leavitt, confirmó que Trump recibió la carta, pero la condenó.

Advertisement

Video

«Es una amenaza de guerra para Venezuela»: la acusación de Nicolás Maduro contra EE.UU

«Francamente, creo que Maduro repitió muchas mentiras en esa carta, y la postura de la administración sobre Venezuela no ha cambiado, -declaró Leavitt en una conferencia de prensa en la Casa Blanca el lunes-. Consideramos ilegítimo al régimen de Maduro, y el presidente ha demostrado claramente su disposición a utilizar todos los medios necesarios para detener el tráfico ilegal de drogas letales del régimen venezolano hacia Estados Unidos».

Con información de la agencia EFE

Advertisement

Estados Unidos,Venezuela,Donald Trump,Nicolás Maduro,Narcotráfico,Últimas Noticias

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Philadelphia DA goes into tirade about ‘fascist’ Trump, ‘Hitler’ when confronted at park in viral video

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Progressive Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner launched into a rant when confronted by a young Republican activist in a local park in a video that has since gone viral.

Advertisement

«Donald Trump is a fascist,» Krasner said during the confrontation. When prompted to elaborate on what he meant by the remark, Krasner instead deflected and continued his tirade.

«You’re un-American, Frank. You’re un-American,» Krasner repeated in the video. «You’re anti-American.»

Frank Scales, the man behind the camera, responded, «I’m a resident of this city who cares about public safety. Why are you calling me un-American?»

Advertisement

SOROS-LINKED DA WARNS TRUMP AFTER DC CRIME CRACKDOWN: ‘BETTER NOT TRY IT IN PHILLY’

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner was seen in a viral video lambasting President Donald Trump as a «fascist.» (Matthew Hatcher/Reuters; Ken Cedeno/Reuters)

«Because you support people who support hate,» Krasner replied. «You don’t understand what it means to be a fascist, what people like Adolf Hitler do, how spreading hate, which is something that, frankly, the people you admire do, gets us closer to that.»

Advertisement

Krasner then got personal, saying that Scales was «a 22-year-old who knows nothing [about what] he’s talking about» and called Scales’ outlet, Surge Philly, a «fake, non-existent paper.»

«[We] went with the goal of talking to Krasner (an incumbent public servant) about why we weren’t allowed in his town hall and to understand why he calls Republicans ‘fascist.’ The idea was to have a civil conversation with Larry in a public space, but he is incapable of civil discourse,» Surge Philly said in a statement to Fox News Digital. «If there’s anything about Larry Krasner we’d like others to know, it’s that he’s a progressive district attorney funded by out-of-state billionaires to advance an agenda not in the interest of the people he serves.»

During the encounter, Krasner referenced an incident in which Scales disrupted a meeting in the city. 

Advertisement

On Sept. 16, Scales participated in what the outlet WCAU described as a «brief disruption» during a town hall that Krasner was holding at the Salt & Life Church. 

This was part of a series of talks the district attorney planned to discuss with the public the possibility of President Donald Trump deploying the National Guard to Philadelphia, as he had in Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles, WPVI-TV reported.

Larry Krasner speaks

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner speaks during a news conference in Philadelphia, on Jan. 31, 2022. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)

The Trump administration has yet to announce plans to deploy the National Guard to Philadelphia. However, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro said earlier this month that the state is «prepared» to respond if Trump were to send troops. 

Advertisement

«I can tell you that we are prepared,» Shapiro said, according to WPVI. «We are prepared should they try to deploy the National Guard against my will in any community across Pennsylvania.»

SHAPIRO CHIDES TRUMP OVER RESPONSE TO CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION

«Fascists are going to be fascists. What can I say?» Krasner said at the town hall, according to WCAU. He then went on to trash the «Pennsylvania Legislature and its MAGA members,» according to the outlet.

Advertisement

«The fundamental premise of the United States is supposed to be that all people are created equal. It’s a deep belief in equality,» Krasner reportedly added. «These people don’t believe in equality at all. They don’t believe in equality of folks. They don’t believe in gender equality. They’re absolutely just as hateful towards women as they are on the issue of race. These are people who agree with Adolf Hitler.» 

At that moment, Scales stood up and yelled, «Lie!» He then added, «People like you are responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk. Stop calling them fascists,» according to WCAU.

BYRON DONALDS REBUKES ‘SQUAD’ MEMBER OVER ‘FASCIST’ SLUR: ‘DO I LOOK LIKE A MEMBER OF THE THIRD REICH?’

Advertisement
Larry Krasner speaks

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner speaks in Philadelphia, on Jan. 11, 2024. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

Scales spoke about the incident in a video on X, saying that he did not attend the meeting with the intention of disrupting the district attorney. It was only after he was told that questions at the town hall had to be written on cards «so they can be vetted and read by a moderator» that he determined the event was no more than a «publicity stunt.»

Two days later, on Sept. 18, Scales attempted to attend another one of Krasner’s town halls but was allegedly denied entry.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Krasner, a vocal Trump critic, on Thursday urged officials to condemn the alleged politicization of the Justice Department, comparing it to Watergate. 

«Justice requires evenhandedness and impartiality in order to function effectively. Sadly, Trump’s actions this week are another example of his toxic assault on constitutional norms,» Krasner said in a statement. «I invite other elected officials to speak up, especially local and state prosecutors, against this egregious politicization of the Justice Department. The ongoing assault on our democracy by the Trump administration is not normal and must be called out at every opportunity.»

Fox News Digital reached out to Scales and Krasner for comment.

Advertisement

politics,philadelphia,donald trump

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias