Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Conservative groups declare 2025 a tipping point on ‘climate hysteria’ as Trump unleashes energy agenda

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: A handful of conservative energy and climate groups released a report outlining the top ten challenges that rocked climate change activism in 2025, as President Donald Trump returned to the White House with a mandate to unleash American energy this year.

Advertisement

Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has signed a series of executive orders and legislation to scale back America’s green energy efforts. Now, a group of prominent conservative energy groups are declaring 2025 as the year of the cultural departure from climate activism.

«This year has proven to be an unexpected tipping point for climate realism,» the conservative groups declared in a report shared exclusively with Fox News Digital.

The American Energy Institute, The Energy & Environment Legal Institute, Truth in Energy & Climate, The Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) and The Heartland Institute signed the «2025: Climate Hysteria’s Surprising Tipping Point,» outlining 2025 as a pivotal year in trading climate activism for energy production and economic realism.

Advertisement

GAS PRICES ARE FALLING — SO WHY ISN’T TRUMP REFILLING THE OIL RESERVE FASTER? WH BLAMES BIDEN-ERA ‘DAMAGE’

President Donald Trump spoke to members of the media on the South Lawn of the White House before boarding Marine One in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, July 15, 2025.  (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

«This is the great climate tipping point the radicals never saw coming,» American Energy Institute CEO Jason Isaac told Fox News Digital. «The world is waking up to the reality that net-zero was never achievable, never affordable, and never honest. Governments, investors, and even climate activists are abandoning the hysteria and choosing energy security, affordability, reliability, and common sense. President Trump led this shift by putting America’s energy strength first.»

Advertisement

TRUMP ADMIN ANNOUNCES BIG STEP TOWARD ‘ENERGY DOMINANCE’ WITH MASSIVE ALASKA LNG PROJECT ALLIANCE

According to the United Nations, net-zero is the global effort to cut carbon emissions to «a small amount of residual emissions that can be absorbed and durably stored by nature and other carbon dioxide removal measures, leaving zero in the atmosphere.»

«As of June 2024, 107 countries, responsible for approximately 82 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, had adopted net-zero pledges either in law,» or through other policy commitments, according to the U.N.

Advertisement

President Barack Obama led efforts to reach the Paris Climate Agreement on Dec. 12, 2015, a nonbinding accord in which nearly 200 nations pledged to curb greenhouse gas emissions in an effort to limit the impacts of climate change.

Trump withdrew the United States from the agreement during his first administration, while his successor, President Joe Biden, quickly rejoined and pursued policies to expand federal climate and clean energy initiatives during his four-year tenure.

After returning to office this year, Trump immediately rolled back restrictions on domestic energy production and began reversing U.S. participation in global climate commitments.

Advertisement
Pump jacks operate in front of a drilling rig in an oil field in Midland, Texas.

This file photo shows pump jacks operating in front of a drilling rig in an oil field in Midland, Texas. (Reuters/Nick Oxford)

Trump signed an executive order «unleashing American energy» on his first day back in office.

He also signed his marquee domestic policy legislation, The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, into law on July 4. It included a series of tax provisions that unwind clean energy credits from the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act and ease federal incentives for renewable energy, while prioritizing fossil fuel development. 

«2025’s ‘tipping points’ are the product of President Trump’s energy dominance agenda and 35 years of valiant work by ‘cancelled’ climate realists who knew from the start that climate alarm was a hoax,» Steve Milloy, senior fellow at the Energy and Environment Legal Institute and a former member of Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency transition team, said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

TRUMP SAYS OFFICIALS WHO PUSHED CLIMATE CHANGE DOOMSDAY POLICIES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED: ‘REWARDED FAILURE’

The report itself outlines ten instances of shifting rhetoric from legacy media outlets and climate change activists, explaining why 2025 was the year of «climate hysteria’s surprising tipping point.»

In the first instance, the conservative signatories cite The New York Times reporting on «why global momentum on climate action is faltering, even as clean energy technology rapidly advances.»

Advertisement

The signatories also cited The New York Times’ reporting on the final document from the U.N. COP-30 climate conference not mentioning «fossil fuels.»

In another instance, the conservative energy groups referenced the resurgence of «climate denial» at the annual U.N. climate talks, citing another article by The Times. 

«When nearly 200 nations signed the 2015 Paris Agreement, acknowledging the threat of rising global temperatures and vowing action, many hoped that the era of climate denial was finally over. Ten years later it has roared back, arguably stronger than ever,» journalists Lisa Friedman and Steven Lee Myers wrote in the article cited in the report.

Advertisement

More reporting from The New York Times included in the report pointed to Gov. Kathy Hochul, D-N.Y., backing away from New York’s 2019 climate law and quoting her as saying, «We need to govern in reality.»

The «tipping points» also included Reuters’ reporting on ExxonMobil questioning the feasibility of net-zero efforts and The New York Times Magazine reporting that «the world has soured on climate politics.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Additionally, the report pointed to The Washington Post’s reporting that political priorities are shifting from climate activism to energy affordability, and The Guardian reporting that a «dramatic slowdown in melting of Arctic sea ice surprises scientists.»

And the report cited The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board arguing that billionaire climate activist Bill Gates has reversed course on his earlier «doomsday» view of climate change.

Fox News Digital reached out to Hochul and Gates for comment but did not immediately receive a response.

Advertisement

energy in america,energy,climate,politics,donald trump

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Ofensiva en EE.UU. para evitar las vacunas contra el sarampión, polio y otras enfermedades

Published

on


Aliados de larga data de Robert F. Kennedy Jr., el ministro de salud de Estados Unidos, han lanzado una nueva iniciativa para revocar leyes que durante décadas han exigido que los chicos se vacunen contra el sarampión, la polio y otras enfermedades antes de ingresar al jardín de infantes.

Una coalición recién formada de activistas está atacando leyes que se consideran fundamentales para la protección contra enfermedades mortales. Los estados han exigido desde hace tiempo la vacunación infantil antes de que los niños puedan comenzar la guardería o la escuela, aunque existen algunas exenciones.

Advertisement

«Lo que tenemos que hacer es romper la barrera», dijo Leslie Manookian, impulsora de una ley que prohibió los mandatos médicos en Idaho, a sus partidarios en una llamada reciente.

Manookian lidera la Coalición por la Ley de Libertad Médica, un nuevo grupo paraguas de al menos 15 organizaciones sin fines de lucro que aboga por el fin de las leyes estatales que codifican lo que llaman mandatos médicos, que se refieren principalmente a las vacunas.

Hasta ahora, se han presentado proyectos de ley en al menos nueve estados que eliminarían todos o casi todos los requisitos escolares, desde estados demócratas como Nueva York, donde no hay posibilidad de aprobación, hasta estados como Nuevo Hampshire, Georgia, Iowa e Idaho, donde las propuestas han cobrado cierta fuerza.

Advertisement

Muchos defensores de las vacunas ven la iniciativa estatal como una segunda etapa en el desmantelamiento de la infraestructura de vacunas del país, basándose en la importante reducción de las vacunas recomendadas por el gobierno federal propuesta por el Sr. Kennedy.

Si bien no es del todo nueva, la estrategia demuestra una comprensión sofisticada de cómo intentar desentrañar más de 100 años de progreso en la protección infantil de patógenos mortales, afirmó Sara Rosenbaum, profesora emérita de derecho sanitario de la Universidad George Washington y exfuncionaria de salud de la administración Clinton.

«Están ebrios de su aparente poder, porque tienen a uno de los suyos en la secretaría del Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos», dijo la Sra. Rosenbaum, refiriéndose al puesto del Sr. Kennedy en el Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos. Creen que es el momento de arriesgarse y simplemente eliminar por completo los requisitos.

Advertisement

Los grupos de la nueva coalición incluyen Children’s Health Defense, la organización sin fines de lucro que el Sr. Kennedy cofundó, y otros dos creados para apoyar su iniciativa MAHA (Make America Healthy Again). Uno de ellos, el Instituto MAHA, trabaja en políticas estatales y afirmó estar contratando personal para apoyar la agenda.

Resistencia en los estados demócratas

La retirada del ministro Kennedy de las recomendaciones federales sobre vacunas, que se han mantenido durante mucho tiempo, ha provocado una oleada de actividad a nivel estatal. A medida que sus políticas se consolidan, algunos estados con tendencia demócrata han creado sus propias alianzas para rechazar las nuevas directrices federales sobre vacunas, mientras que algunos estados liderados por republicanos han optado por consagrarlas.

Advertisement

En un evento de la Fundación Heritage con el Sr. Kennedy este mes, Kim Mack Rosenberg, asesora general de Children’s Health Defense, afirmó que una alta prioridad sería deshacer los requisitos estatales.

«En última instancia, el objetivo es eliminar los mandatos», declaró Mack Rosenberg.

«Especialmente cuando se vinculan esos mandatos a la asistencia escolar, se crea una situación increíblemente difícil para las familias», añadió.

Advertisement

Cuando se le preguntó en un evento en Tennessee a principios de este mes sobre la iniciativa para derogar los requisitos de ingreso a la escuela, Kennedy dijo que no participaba en el esfuerzo. Pero añadió: «Creo en la libertad de elección», lo que provocó el aplauso del público. Dijo que apoyaba que las personas tomaran decisiones sobre las vacunas junto con sus familias y médicos.

Manookian afirmó que el esfuerzo de la coalición busca poner fin a lo que ella consideraba coerción relacionada con todas las intervenciones médicas. «Se trata de devolver el poder a la persona», declaró en una entrevista.

Las propuestas para eliminar los requisitos de vacunación para el ingreso a la escuela han tenido resultados dispares: algunos esfuerzos se han estancado en Oklahoma e Indiana, y otros están pendientes, incluso en Virginia Occidental. Un proyecto de ley en Arizona también está pendiente, pero se espera que enfrente el veto del gobernador, un demócrata, y es poco probable que uno en Nueva York sea aprobado por la legislatura estatal, controlada por los demócratas. Quienes respaldan la coalición esperan que se presente un proyecto de ley en Luisiana el próximo mes.

Advertisement

En Florida, a pesar de la intención declarada de las autoridades estatales de poner fin a los mandatos de vacunación infantil, no Se ha presentado un proyecto de ley que eliminaría las normas de admisión a la escuela. Sin embargo, una propuesta permitiría una exención por «conciencia» o creencias personales que facilitaría a los padres la renuncia a las vacunas.

La polémica por las vacunas crece en Estados Unidos. Foto: AP

Alarma entre los pediatras

Las iniciativas para revocar las leyes estatales han alarmado a los pediatras y a otros defensores de las vacunas, quienes sostienen que existe una amplia aceptación entre los padres y el público en general de vacunar a los niños pequeños.

Los expertos en salud pública consideran que la eliminación de los requisitos escolares es una forma segura de reducir la cobertura de vacunación, lo que resulta en un aumento repentino de casos de sarampión y tos ferina, seguido posteriormente de posibles brotes de rubéola y polio. Las consecuencias son evidentes en Carolina del Sur, donde un brote de sarampión ha afectado a más de 900 personas, incluyendo al menos 19 que fueron hospitalizadas con complicaciones como neumonía e inflamación cerebral.

Advertisement

En varias escuelas en el epicentro del brote, menos del 80% de los estudiantes habían recibido todas las vacunas infantiles requeridas, muy por debajo del 95% necesario para detener la propagación del sarampión, un virus altamente contagioso.

Sin embargo, ha surgido una potente barrera de protección contra el debilitamiento de los mandatos de vacunación. Varias encuestas muestran que los votantes penalizarían a los legisladores que estén a favor de eliminar los requisitos escolares. En una encuesta reciente, realizada por The Wall Street Journal, los votantes dieron a los demócratas una ventaja del 9% sobre los republicanos cuando se les preguntó qué partido es el más adecuado para gestionar la política de vacunación.

Dos encuestas encargadas por defensores de las vacunas y realizadas por empresas con inclinaciones republicanas revelaron que los votantes de Florida y Tennessee no apoyarían a los legisladores que desean eliminar los mandatos de vacunación escolar. Una encuesta de Fabrizio Ward, una empresa en la que el presidente Trump confía, reveló que los votantes indecisos en contiendas congresionales reñidas le restarían unos 20 puntos porcentuales a un candidato republicano crítico con las vacunas.

Advertisement

«El escepticismo sobre las vacunas es una mala política», decía el memorando de Fabrizio Ward.

Los defensores de las vacunas siguen preocupados por las propuestas en New Hampshire, Iowa, Idaho, Georgia y posiblemente otros estados que podrían eliminar o limitar drásticamente los requisitos de vacunación para el ingreso a la escuela.

«Enfermedad sin control»

Advertisement

«Antes de las vacunas, uno de cada cinco niños no llegaba a cumplir cinco años», afirmó Jennifer Herricks, directora de defensa de American Families for Vaccines, una organización sin fines de lucro que recibe parte de su financiación de los fabricantes de vacunas. «Estas políticas han servido para proteger a los niños en el momento en que son más vulnerables a estas enfermedades».

En New Hampshire, los escépticos de las vacunas dominaron una larga audiencia sobre un proyecto de ley que eliminaría las vacunas obligatorias para las escuelas, pero que fue modificado para mantener la vacuna contra la polio. Funcionarios del departamento de salud afirmaron que la propuesta incumpliría con los requisitos de las subvenciones federales y le costaría varios millones de dólares anuales destinados a la vacunación de niños de bajos ingresos.

Si se aprueba el proyecto de ley, podría producirse una «enfermedad generalizada sin control», declaró Megan Petty, jefa de la Oficina de Control de Enfermedades Infecciosas de New Hampshire.

Advertisement

El Dr. Joseph Ladapo, director general de salud pública de Florida, estuvo en Tampa el pasado marzo. En otoño, anunció que el estado quería eliminar los requisitos de vacunación. Crédito… Chris O’Meara/Associated Press

Idaho aprobó una ley en 2025 que elimina los mandatos médicos para vacunas u otras intervenciones, pero no abordó ni modificó específicamente los requisitos de vacunación para guarderías o escuelas, afirmó la Sra. Manookian.

Añadió que planeaba apoyar una nueva propuesta en Idaho que… Algunos distritos escolares de Idaho se han mantenido firmes en los requisitos de vacunación a pesar de la prohibición general de la ley vigente contra los mandatos médicos, afirmó.

Advertisement

«Cuanto más se entrometen las escuelas y las guarderías», afirmó, «más se perjudican a sí mismas».

Chris Anders, legislador republicano de Virginia Occidental, presentó este mes un proyecto de ley que eliminaría los mandatos de vacunación escolar, incluyendo el requisito de que los departamentos de salud de los condados ofrezcan vacunas gratuitas a los niños de bajos ingresos. Añadió que era poco probable que otros legisladores impulsaran la medida.

«Si las personas deciden no vacunarse, es su decisión», afirmó. «Al igual que si deciden no usar el cinturón de seguridad, el casco de motocicleta o cualquier otra cosa. Si deciden eso, sufren las consecuencias».

Advertisement

El año pasado, en Texas, el gobernador Greg Abbott firmó discretamente un proyecto de ley que abrió la puerta a demandas contra los fabricantes de vacunas que se anuncian en el estado.

En Florida, el Dr. Joseph Ladapo, director general de servicios de salud, anunció el otoño pasado que el estado eliminaría los requisitos de vacunación. Ante la falta de una propuesta en la legislatura para que esto suceda, se está avanzando en un esfuerzo reducido para cambiar las normas estatales.

Las autoridades de Florida buscan derogar el requisito de que los niños sean vacunados contra la varicela, la hepatitis B, la bacteria neumocócica y la Haemophilus influenzae tipo B (Hib), una enfermedad que puede ser mortal.

Advertisement

El estado celebró una polémica audiencia en diciembre sobre el plan. Entre los testigos se encontraba Jamie Schanbaum, a quien le amputaron los dedos y la parte inferior de las piernas tras enfermar gravemente de meningitis, enfermedad que se previene con la vacuna neumocócica. Ha defendido ampliamente la vacuna y en diciembre pidió a los líderes de Florida que mantuvieran vigentes sus requisitos de vacunación.

«Es muy frustrante», dijo en una entrevista, «ver y experimentar la realidad actual y que nuestras directrices médicas más importantes y respetadas no se tomen en serio».

Fuente: The New York Times

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Cal State prof warns scrapping SAT in name of ‘inclusivity’ is leaving students unprepared

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A California economics professor is sounding the alarm on the «deficits in learning» she is seeing in the classroom, arguing that the decision to scrap standardized testing in the name of «inclusivity» is actually a disservice to the students it claims to help.

Advertisement

Cal State Long Beach professor Andrea Mays told Fox News Digital that the current cohort of college students, many of whom spent their formative middle school years in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, are arriving on campus unprepared for basic coursework.

Mays spoke to Fox News Digital about the state’s university system’s decision to scrap the SAT as a requirement for college admission as playing a large role in that and that it has led to students coming to college unprepared and dropping out at higher rates. 

Mays says the drop rate is up «phenomenally» and that chairs of other departments tell her it’s widespread, with 25% of students dropping classes, with math being a key area where students are coming in underprepared. 

Advertisement

GOT A SCOOP ON CAMPUS? SEND US A TIP HERE

A teacher at Cal State Long Beach is warning of the ramifications of the state system removing the SAT requirement.  (Canart7/iStock)

«I teach a class that is offered for non-economics majors,» Mays explained. «I could put on an index card exactly what math is required for my class, it’s not calculus, and they are struggling with it, they’re embarrassed, they’re demoralized, they come into my classroom, and they say, or into my office hours, and they say, I never learned this stuff, I don’t know how to calculate a percentage change.»

Advertisement

«I can show them, but those are the students who are actually coming to me and asking me for help. There are lots of other students who are just too embarrassed even to do that, and who just end up dropping the class.»

Mays, who recently penned an opinion piece in the Orange County Register with the headline «Bring back the SAT at CSU — or admit we are failing our own students,» says that the explanation she has gotten for the CSU system dropping the SAT is that «we want to be inclusive.»

«I am definitely for inclusivity on our campus,» Mays said. «We have a very diverse campus here. But I think it’s fraud to tell people that what we’re doing is so that we can be inclusive when really what we’re doing is we’re allowing people to enter that we know are really going to have a difficult time of it. They have no idea.»

Advertisement

‘NATION’S REPORT CARD’ SHOWS ALARMING DECLINE IN SCIENCE, MATH AND READING SCORES

Graduates take part in the commencement ceremony for the College of Natural Sciences & Mathematics, California State University of Long Beach

Graduates take part in the commencement ceremony for the College of Natural Sciences & Mathematics, California State University of Long Beach at Angel Stadium in Anaheim on Monday, May 15, 2023. (Murray/MediaNews Group/Long Beach Press-Telegram via Getty Images)

In recent years, several activist groups have railed against the SAT and standardized testing in general, including the nation’s largest teachers union, and Fox News Digital asked Mays if that narrative is behind the CSU decision not to require the SAT. 

«That might be a little bit of the implication there without saying so, I’m not an expert in the recent changes in the SAT, others have done that work looking at whether you can change questions so that groups that don’t do well on certain questions, can do better on other types of questions,» Mays said. 

Advertisement

«There’s definitely room for discussion about what kind of a standard, is it the ACT? Is it the SAT or something? The problem is that high schools are heterogeneous,» Mays said. 

«Not all high schools are excellent even if they say they are. And so you’ll get students who get As in algebra two, and then they come into my class and they can’t calculate a percentage change. They can’t find the intersection between two straight lines, both of which are seventh and eighth grade math requirements. So that students are getting passed on from high school into a four-year university is a disservice to them. They get here thinking they’re wonderful and finding out that they are at the bottom of the ability distribution for math and English.»

Acting Chancellor Steve Relyea stated in 2022 that when the decision to remove the SAT and ACT was made, the goal was to «level the playing field» and provide «greater access.» The decision followed a year-long study by the Admission Advisory Council, which found that the tests provided «negligible additional value» in predicting student success compared to high school GPA.

Advertisement

SCATHING REPORT REVEALS ANTIFA-LINKED ORG PASSING OUT MATERIAL TO K-12 STUDENTS: ‘POLITICAL REVOLUTION’

The system officially moved to «multi-factored admission criteria,» focusing on GPA in specific high school courses, extracurriculars, and socio-economic factors.

«Access without readiness is not opportunity,» Mays wrote in her article. «It is a disservice. If CSU is serious about student success, affordability, and equity, it must be willing to measure preparedness — and act on what it finds.»

Advertisement

Mays added, «Pretending preparation gaps do not exist is not equity.»

Mays told Fox News Digital that California’s robust and effective community college system is a tool ready to be utilized as an «alternative» for students who are coming out of high school, many who lost years of learning during COVID, and not prepared for college. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«Go into the community system and take the lowest level English class you can so that you can write a sentence, you can write a paragraph, you could make an argument,» Mays said. «Take a basic math class that will transfer onto a four-year university and learn how to do the basic math that perhaps you didn’t learn when you were in middle school online.»

The California State University System did not respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. 

«There’s no reason not to use an SAT as a filter to let students know whether they’re prepared for college-level work or not,» Mays told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

campus radicals,california,education

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

US military in Syria carries out 10 strikes on more than 30 ISIS targets: Photos

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced Saturday that it had carried out ten strikes against over 30 ISIS targets in Syria, in recent days as part of a joint military effort to «sustain relentless military pressure on remnants from the terrorist network.»

Advertisement

CENTCOM said, from Feb. 3 – 12, its forces «struck ISIS infrastructure and weapons storage targets with precision munitions delivered by fixed-wing, rotary-wing, and unmanned aircraft.»

US MILITARY IN SYRIA CARRIES OUT 5 STRIKES AGAINST ‘MULTIPLE ISIS TARGETS’

Recently, CENTCOM forces conducted five strikes against an ISIS communication site, critical logistics node, and weapons storage facilities in Syria between Jan. 27 and Feb. 2.

Advertisement

Operation Hawkeye Strike targets over 30 ISIS sites following a December ambush that killed US troops.  (CENTCOM)

«Striking these targets demonstrates our continued focus and resolve for preventing an ISIS resurgence in Syria,» Adm. Brad Cooper, the commander of CENTCOM, said in a statement at the time.

«Operating in coordination with coalition and partner forces to ensure the enduring defeat of ISIS makes America, the region and the world safer,» he added.

Advertisement

AFTER TRUMP DECLARED ISIS DEFEATED, US FACES NEW TEST AS DETAINEES MOVE AMID SYRIA POWER SHIFT

On Jan. 27, President Trump told reporters he had a «great conversation with the highly respected» President of Syria, Ahmed al-Sharaa. 

Photos from u.s. strike in syria hitting over 30 ISIS sites

More than 50 ISIS terrorists have been killed or captured and over 100 ISIS infrastructure targets have been struck. (CENTCOM)

«All of the things having to do with Syria in that area are working out very, very well,» said President Trump. «So we are very happy about it.»

Advertisement

The Operation Hawkeye Strike mission was launched in response to an ISIS «ambush» attack that left two U.S. service members and an American interpreter dead on Dec. 13, 2025, in Palmyra, Syria.

AFTER TRUMP DECLARED ISIS DEFEATED, US FACES NEW TEST AS DETAINEES MOVE AMID SYRIA POWER SHIFT

«More than 50 ISIS terrorists have been killed or captured and over 100 ISIS infrastructure targets have been struck with hundreds of precision munitions during two months of targeted operations,» states CENTCOM.

Advertisement
Photos from u.s. strike in syria hitting over 30 ISIS sites

The Operation Hawkeye Strike mission was launched in response to an ISIS «ambush» attack that left two U.S. service members and an American interpreter dead. (CENTCOM)

On Thursday, CENTCOM announced it has completed its withdrawal of American forces from al-Tanf Garrison in Syria pointing to a broader shift in U.S. posture in the region.

CHAOS IN SYRIA SPARKS FEARS OF ISIS PRISON BREAKS AS US RUSHES DETAINEES TO IRAQ

Photos from u.s. strike in syria hitting over 30 ISIS sites

«Striking these targets demonstrates our continued focus and resolve for preventing an ISIS resurgence in Syria,» said Adm. Brad Cooper. (CENTCOM)

Operation Inherent Resolve was launched in 2014 to combat ISIS with American troops maintaining a limited presence to support partner forces and prevent ISIS from returning after it was territorially defeated in 2019.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 

Fox News Digital’s Ashley Carnahan and Greg Norman-Diamond contributed to this report.

Advertisement



world,isis,syria,military,pentagon

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias