Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Cori Bush ripped for ‘jaw-dropping’ hypocrisy on key issue amid comeback House bid

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Former Missouri «Squad» Rep. Cori Bush, who is seeking to reclaim the seat she lost in 2024, recently complained on social media that Congress doesn’t prioritize public transit funding—even though she once was part of a cohort of radical lawmakers who voted against a bill providing billions for transit improvements because it didn’t allocate enough money for their far-left agenda.

Advertisement

Bush was just one of five other Democratic Party lawmakers, all part of the progressive group dubbed «The Squad,» who voted against the 2021 bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, despite it allocating up to $108 billion for public transit investments. Bush and her other far-left colleagues at the time wanted more money to also be allocated to environmental and social programs, like funding for universal pre-K, Medicare and Medicaid expansions, affordable housing, green infrastructure, a Civilian Climate Corps, and also included oil drilling and leasing bans.

At the time of «The Squad’s» stand against the bipartisan infrastructure bill, Bush argued that she «didn’t come to Congress to allow [her constituents’] priorities to be put on a shelf.»

Meanwhile, Bush lamented to her followers on social media last week – amid her run to regain her position in the House – that funding for public transit is not prioritized in Congress. She implied this was a major problem because transit funding, Bush said, «is essential in meeting the most basic needs» of her constituents.

Advertisement

UNEARTHED RECORDS TORPEDO CORI BUSH’S NEW CLAIM ABOUT ‘BILLIONS’ IN FUNDING SHE DELIVERED TO DISTRICT

Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., delivers her concession speech during a primary election watch party on Aug. 6, 2024 in St Louis, Missouri.  (Michael B. Thomas/Getty Images)

«Reliable transit service is essential in meeting the most basic needs of St. Louis,» Bush said to her social media followers. «Unfortunately, transit funding is not prioritized in Congress. That changes when I return to Washington, as I’ll continue fighting for legislation that benefits us.»

Advertisement

Republican campaign experts balked at Bush’s stump message to voters, including longtime campaign strategist Colin Reed, who noted how «Campaign rhetoric has a nasty habit of colliding with contradictory votes from the past, and undermining politicians’ credibility and trust.»

Colin Reed

Colin Reed, GOP strategist and co-founder of South and Hill Strategies who served as the former campaign manager to former Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass. (South and Hill)

In her social media post complaining about the lack of emphasis on public transit funding in Congress, Bush included an image of her at what appears to be a bus stop touting how she «introduced legislation to fund bus and light rail projects at a greater scale.» 

While previously in Congress, Bush introduced two public transit-related bills, the Bus Rapid Transit Act and the Light Rail Transit Act, which sought to establish federal grant programs through the Federal Transit Administration to provide funding for upgrading transit infrastructure nationwide.

Advertisement

MEET THE NEW ‘SQUAD’: THE NEXT GENERATION OF TRUMP-ERA PROGRESSIVE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES 

When reached for comment and asked to explain the discrepancy between her complaints about Congress not prioritizing public transit funding, and Bush’s own neglect of such funding when other measures were on the chopping block, her campaign said the former congresswoman was «clear and consistent» in explaining that her ‘no» vote was because the bipartisan infrastructure bill was decoupled from the left’s Build Back Better bill that contained an array of aggressive social and environmental policies.  

«Universal pre-K, expanded Medicare, the Child Tax Credit, and lower prescription drug prices were all policies that Missouri’s 1st District sent the Congresswoman to DC to win,» a Bush campaign spokesperson told Fox News Digital. «She’s been clear and consistent on this: her vote was because the infrastructure bill was uncoupled from Build Back Better, which contained those policies. With so much on the line for St. Louis and the nation, the Congresswoman wanted to fight for more, not settle for less.»

Advertisement
skyline of St. Louis, Missouri with the famed Gateway Arch

The skyline of St. Louis, Missouri with the famed Gateway Arch along the Mississippi River  (iStock)

Bush rose to political prominence as a Black Lives Matter activist during the 2014 Ferguson, Missouri protest following the police officer involved shooting death of Michael Brown. In 2020, Bush upset longtime incumbent Rep. William Lacy Clay Jr., becoming the first Black woman to represent Missouri in Congress. 

During her time on Capitol Hill, she aligned with «Squad» politicians like Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., who have been advocates for radical proposals to defund the police, socialize medical care, push environmental justice and more.

AOC’S LUXURY SPENDING BINGE IN PUERTO RICO REIGNITES QUESTIONS ABOUT ‘SOCIALIST’ BRAND: ‘PEAK HYPOCRISY’

Advertisement
AOC speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., talks with reporters outside the U.S. Capitol about members’ security after the murder of Charlie Kirk on Thursday, Sept. 11, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

«If this is the best Cori Bush has to offer the same Missouri voters who already bounced her out of office, the sequel is shaping up to have a similar ending to the last campaign,» Reed said of Bush’s campaign stumping ahead of her upcoming election in November.

«No wonder Cori Bush restricts comments on her X account posts, because her hypocrisy knows no bounds and deserves to be called out by the American people,» Mark Bednar, who served as head of communications for now-former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy, told Fox News Digital.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP  

Advertisement

«Whether it’s driving an SUV but demanding everyone else must live under the Green New Deal, spending thousands on private security while calling to defund the police, or now trying to hide from her own voting record, Cori Bush’s hypocrisy is nothing short of jaw-dropping,» Bednar continued. «The voters of St. Louis have already rejected her once, and it shouldn’t be a surprise if it happens again this election cycle.»

midterm elections,the squad,elections,missouri,politics,democratic party,democrats

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

En su mensaje de Pascua, el Papa pidió que «los que tienen el poder de desencadenar guerras elijan la paz»

Published

on



El Papa celebró su primera Pascua este domingo en una plaza San Pedro bulliciosa por el entusiasmo de 50 mil fieles y turistas. Una Pascua ensombrecida por la guerra a cuyos responsables pidió «elijan la paz» en su mensaje Urbi et Orbi (a Roma y el mundo).

En la conclusión de la primera Semana Santa de su pontificado, León XIV presidió la más importante celebración del calendario cristiano en un clima de inquietud por la guerra en Medio Oriente.

Advertisement

Anoche, Sábado Santo, los temores de un agravamiento del panorama bélico también resonaron en la basílica de San Pedro. El pontífice llamó esta mañana a la esperanza ante la violencia e la guerra “que mata y destruye” y la “idolatría del lucro” que saquea los recursos de la tierra” en su mensaje durante la misa de Resurrección.

En la homilía, León advirtió que “la muerte siempre asecha” y se manifiesta en los “egoísmos partidistas”, la opresión de los pobres y la “escasa atención” a los más frágiles.

“La vemos en la violencia, en las heridas del mundo, en el grito de dolor que se eleva por todas partes a causa de los abusos que aplastan a los más débiles”. Frente a ello subrayó que la Pascua es “una fuerza imparable”, capaz de dar luz en la oscuridad más profunda.

Advertisement

“Hoy necesitamos este canto de esperanza», afirmó, pidiendo a los creyentes a que “lleven la alegría de la resurrección por las calles del mundo”.

Pero el mensaje pascual “no siempre es fácil de acoger”, especialmente cuando “el lastre de los pecados” o la soledad agotan la esperanza”, señaló.

Señaló que el anuncio pascual alcanza al ser humano “hasta los abismos de la muerte” y “abre a la esperanza que no desfallece, a la luz que no se apaga, a esa plena de alegría que nada puede borrar”.

Advertisement

“Cuando las preocupaciones o los resentimientos sofocan la alegría de vivir, cuando sentimos tristeza y cansancio, cuando nos sentimos traicionados o rechazados, no parece que hayamos caído en un túnel del que no vemos la salida”, admitió.

Del altar frente a la basílica partió un bellísimo despliegue de decoraciones florados con decenas de miles de flores aportadas por los floristas holandeses.

Terminada la misa, el Papa se trasladó al balcón central de la basílica, donde el 8 de mayo pasado apareció ante la multitud y se anunció el Habemus Papam desde el cual el pontífice envió su bendición Urbi et Orbi, a Roma y al Mundo.

Advertisement

León XIV evitó, como es habitual en los mensajes dominicales tras el ángelus del mediodía, de pasar revista a los conflictos bélicos que se difunden en el mundo.

Anunció que el sábado 11 de este mes habrá una celebración en la basílica de San Pedro para implorar a Dios por la paz.

Lanzó mensajes en varios idiomas, como es costumbre en la jornada de Pascua y llamó al mundo a “elegir la paz”.

Advertisement

Denunció la “indiferencia” ante la guerras en el mundo, que dejan miles de muertos.

“Nos estamos habituando a la violencia , nos resignamos a ella y nos volvemos indiferentes ante la muerte de miles de miles de personas, indiferentes ante las secuelas de odio y división que siembran los conflictos y a sus consecuencias económicas y sociales”, señaló.

León XIV hizo un llamado a deponer las armas y buscar la paz en los conflictos globales mediante el diálogo. Enfatizó el mensaje de esperanza de la Pascua como una celebración de la resurrección de Jesús tras ser crucificado.

Advertisement

“¡Dejemos que nuestros corazones sean transformados por el amor de Cristo por nosotros!”. “Que quienes tienen armas las depongan!”. “¡Que quienes tienen el poder de desatar guerras elijan la paz!” “¡No una paz impuesta por la fuerza sino mediante el diálogo!” “¡No con el deseo de dominar a los demás sino de encontrarnos!”, imploró el pontífice.

El Papa mencionó una sensación de indiferencia “ante la muerte de miles de personas” y ante las consecuencias económicas y sociales que producen”-

Sin mencionar las guerras en particular, León citó a su predecesor, el Papa argentino Francisco, que durante su última aparición pública desde el mismo balcón principal de la Basílica, el día antes de su muerte, recordó a los fieles la “gran sed de muere, de matar, que presenciamos cada día».

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Surging UK Green Party pushes church-state split, critics warn of break from Britain’s Christian roots

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

LONDON: The left-wing British Green Party has said it wants to separate the Church of England from the state if it wins the next general election, which must be held before August 2029.

Advertisement

The Church of England has been the «established» church since the 16th-century Reformation, with the British monarch serving as its supreme governor. For traditionalists, this link is not merely ceremonial but is the foundational bedrock of British identity.

The Greens have come under fire for seeking to remove centuries of British history and tradition by separating the church from British politics, with critics characterizing it as the latest move against Christianity in the U.K.

GB News reported last month that the Green Party policy document stated: «No person shall hold office in the state, or be excluded from any such office, by virtue of their or their spouse’s membership or non-membership of any religion or denomination of religion.»

Advertisement

UK FLAG CLASH AS FOREIGN BANNERS FLY, CITIZENS PUSH BACK AGAINST WOKE POLICIES RESHAPING BRITAIN

King Charles ascended the throne in September 2022 following his mother’s death, and his coronation was in May 2023. (Richard Pohle – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

Michael McManus, the director of research at the Henry Jackson Society, a U.K. think tank, told Fox News Digital, «Britain is a tolerant society but with clear Christian origins and culture. Aiming to disestablish the Church of England could be seen as an attempt to reject that ethical foundation without being clear what would replace it instead.»

Advertisement

High-profile figures have also weighed in on the debate, with actor and comedian John Cleese responding to a comment about the Greens’ proposal by stating on X: «The UK has always been based at the deepest level on Christian values, regardless of dogma. Despite the many mistakes made by churches, for centuries British people have been influenced by Christ’s teaching. If these values are replaced by Islamic ones, this will not be Britain anymore.»

FORMER UK PM DEFENDS TRUMP FOR HIGHLIGHTING ‘SHARIA LAW’ IN BRITAIN DURING UN SPEECH

The Greens are a growing political force, placing second behind Reform UK in a recent YouGov poll. Another YouGov poll linked the Greens’ rise in popularity with younger voters in the country, finding a majority of those between 18 and 24 supported them, while also doing well with women and other groups.

Advertisement
UK Green Party leader Zack Polanski.

UK Green Party leader Zack Polanski. (Finnbarr Webster/Getty Images)

A spokesperson for the Green Party told Fox News Digital, «We will be setting out our detailed plans for government at the time of the next General Election, just as we did at the last General Election. As always, our members will be shaping our priorities. These will again address the real and immediate needs of people and the planet, such as tackling the climate crisis, bringing down the cost of living and rebuilding our public services, including the NHS. Our focus is on the issues that impact ordinary people most.»

CHURCHILL, SHAKESPEARE AND THE UK FLAG ALL UNDER SIEGE IN MODERN BRITAIN, COMMENTATORS SAY

Green Party leader Zack Polanski has defended a secular state. He has also drawn criticism for his support of legalizing drugs such as heroin and cocaine, his climate policies and anti-Israel positioning.

Advertisement
Christmas morning Eucharist service at Canterbury Cathedral with clergy and congregation

A view of Christmas morning Eucharist service at Canterbury Cathedral, Canterbury, United Kingdom, on Dec. 25, 2022. (Stuart Brock/Anadolu Agency)

The timing of the Green Party’s push is particularly sensitive as it comes on the heels of the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026, which passed last month, removing the last hereditary aristocrats from Parliament. With the hereditary principle gone, the presence of the «Lords Spiritual» has become the next logical target for constitutional reformers. There are currently 26 seats reserved for Church of England archbishops and bishops in the House of Lords.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

As the U.K. heads toward a local 2026 election cycle, the «Church and State» debate looks set to become a wedge issue. For the Greens, it represents their commitment to a «diverse and inclusive» Britain. For their detractors, it is a dangerous move that risks «de-Christianizing» the country at a moment of profound social uncertainty.

Advertisement

Whether the proposal will mobilize a new «religious vote» or simply fade behind the urgency of other issues remains to be seen. What is clear, commentators say, is that the image of the established Church is increasingly being viewed through the lens of a much sharper and more polarized political fight.



united kingdom, elections, green, religion, uk politics, christianity religion, family personal freedoms

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Federal judge blocks Trump push to collect race-based admissions data

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump’s effort to investigate race-based admissions at U.S. colleges was temporarily blocked Friday by a federal judge in Boston.

Advertisement

U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV granted a preliminary injunction Friday, temporarily barring the Trump administration from forcing public colleges in 17 Democrat-led states to submit detailed admissions data meant to prove they are not unconstitutional considering race.

Saylor did admit the federal government likely can seek such information in «identifying potential problems» and «patterns of discrimination» but the executive order’s 120-day deadline was «rushed and chaotic» and «epitomizes arbitrary and capricious agency action.»

Trump, while moving to shut down the Department of Education to return its functions to the states last March, sought a four-month deadline for race data on college admissions this past August.

Advertisement

TRUMP ADMIN PROBE ACCUSES HARVARD OF DISCRIMINATING AGAINST JEWISH STUDENTS, THREATENS TO PULL ALL FUNDING

Education Secretary Linda McMahon (Getty Images)

«Within 120 days of the date of this memorandum, and to be initiated this 2025-2026 school year, the Secretary of Education, in coordination with NCES [National Center for Education Statistics], shall expand the scope of required reporting to provide adequate transparency into admissions, as determined by the Secretary of Education, consistent with applicable law,» Trump’s executive order challenged by Democrats read. 

Advertisement

A coalition of 17 Democratic state attorneys general sued, arguing the new reporting regime would invade student privacy, burden universities and trigger unwarranted federal investigations.

«Plaintiffs have established, based on the record before the Court, that they are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the agency action was ‘arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and not otherwise in accordance with the law,’» Saylor concluded. «Furthermore, and notwithstanding the contention of the government, plaintiffs have established that immediate irreparable harm will result if the injunction does not issue. And they have likewise established that the balance of equities and the public interest favor preliminary injunctive relief. Accordingly, the motion for a preliminary injunction will be granted.»

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY VIOLATED TILE VI WITH ‘UNLAWFUL DEI POLICIES,’ EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SAYS

Advertisement

The administration argued the data collection is needed to ensure colleges are complying with the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision ending affirmative action in admissions, while still allowing applicants to discuss how race affected their lives in essays.

«Race-based admissions practices are not only unfair, but also threaten our national security and well-being,» Trump’s order read. «It is therefore the policy of my Administration to ensure institutions of higher education receiving Federal financial assistance are transparent in their admissions practices.»

TRUMP DOJ PROBES MICHIGAN SCHOOLS OVER GENDER CURRICULUM, JOINS LAWSUIT AGAINST LA RACE-BASED PROGRAM

Advertisement

Under the policy, colleges were told to provide admissions data broken down by race and sex and to report it retroactively for seven years, with possible penalties for schools that failed to comply.

The administration’s policy echoes settlement agreements the government negotiated with Brown University and Columbia University, restoring their federal research money. The universities agreed to give the government data on the race, grade-point average and standardized test scores of applicants, admitted students and enrolled students. The schools also agreed to be audited by the government and to release admissions statistics to the public.

The NECS is to collect the new data, including the race and sex of colleges’ applicants, admitted students and enrolled students. Education Secretary Linda McMahon has said the data, which was originally due by March 18, must be disaggregated by race and sex and retroactively reported for the past seven years.

Advertisement

TRUMP’S DEMAND FOR COLLEGES NATIONWIDE TO FORK OVER RACE DATA FACES LEGAL HURDLE

President Donald Trump speaking with Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the White House Roosevelt Room

President Donald Trump speaks with Secretary of Education Linda McMahon during an executive order signing ceremony in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on July 31, 2025. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

If colleges fail to submit timely, complete and accurate data, the administration has said McMahon can take action under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, which outlines requirements for colleges receiving federal financial aid for students.

The Trump administration separately has sued Harvard University over similar data, saying it refused to provide admissions records the Justice Department demanded to ensure the school stopped using affirmative action.

Advertisement

Harvard has said the university has been responding to the government’s requests and is in compliance with the Supreme Court ruling against affirmative action. On Monday, the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights directed Harvard to comply with the data requests within 20 days or face referral to the U.S. Justice Department.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Saylor’s injunction applies only to public institutions in the 17 Democratic plaintiff states, at least for now.

Advertisement

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

dept of education, federal judges, education, justice department

Continue Reading

Tendencias