Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Democrat claims SAVE Act would block married women from voting; Republicans say that’s wrong

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Rep. Hillary Scholten, D-Mich., is claiming that under Republican-led voter integrity legislation, married women would find themselves unable to vote unless they changed their birth certificate to match other government-issued ID.

Advertisement

«Nearly 70 million married women in this country have changed their last name, but their birth certificates don’t reflect that,» Scholten said at a press event, explaining her opposition to the SAVE America Act.

«In Michigan’s third district alone, 167,000 women could find themselves unable to register simply because when they got married, they didn’t change both their ID and their birth certificate.»

SCHUMER FACES BACKLASH AFTER CALLING SAVE ACT ‘JIM CROW’ DESPITE PREVIOUS ALLEGATION FALLING FLAT

Advertisement

Hillary Scholten, left, pictured alongside an «Only Citizens Vote» sign, right. (Bill Pugliano/Getty Images; Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)

However, under Michigan law, marriage isn’t listed as one of the reasons to correct a birth certificate.

According to the state’s Department of Health and Human Services, citizens may only change their birth certificate to correct a birth record, change a sex designation, correct a place of birth, or amend a parental record.

Advertisement

Scholten, like many Democrats, has voiced opposition to the SAVE America Act — a bill that would require federal voter registrants to present government-issued photo ID to verify their citizenship.

The bill would also require a photo ID to vote.

HAKEEM JEFFRIES PRESSED ON DEMOCRAT OPPOSITION TO VOTER ID

Advertisement
A Florida voter registration application

A Florida voter registration application is shown, Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2020. (Wilfredo Lee/AP Photo)

In their view, the bill creates too many obstacles for voters to participate in federal elections.

«Republicans are trying to sell the SAVE Act as a way to stop non-citizens from voting, but we know that’s already illegal. What this bill really does is make it harder for citizens to vote, especially women,» Scholten said when the House considered an earlier version of the legislation last year.

Although the bill lists a birth certificate as one way voters can confirm their identity, it does not specify a last-name match requirement in the manner Scholten described.

Advertisement

Instead, voters can use «a certified birth certificate issued by a state in which the applicant was born … [that] includes the full name, date of birth, and place of birth of the applicant» to supplement other forms of identification.

A senior GOP staffer confirmed that the SAVE Act does not come with the requirements Scholten described.

«That is not right at all and simply another Democrat propaganda talking point,» the staffer said. «Every married woman should have their marriage license.»

Advertisement

The office of Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas, one of the many who has helped champion the SAVE Act, pointed to an analysis of the bill laid out by the Federalist Society, a conservative-leaning legal group.

People gathered outdoors hold signs and watch a speaker address a crowd near the U.S. Capitol.

Attendees listen at an «Only Citizens Vote» bus tour rally advocating passage of the SAVE Act at Upper Senate Park outside the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., Sept. 10, 2025. (Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)

«The SAVE Act itself contemplates these name changes and provides protections so that Americans who have changed their names — because of marriage or otherwise — are not prevented from voting,» the group’s page reads.

«The bipartisan federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is commanded by the SAVE Act to establish guidelines for states to accept supplementary documents — for instance, a marriage license — to prove citizenship when a voter’s birth certificate and current name do not match. Those on the Left who claim that the SAVE Act will disenfranchise millions of married women are simply wrong; they ought to read the bill’s text and see that it provides mechanisms to ensure that this does not happen.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Among other forms of valid paperwork, voters can also display a passport, a REAL ID, or a military identification card to prove their citizenship.

Scholten’s office did not respond to a request for clarification on her statement.

Advertisement

congress,politics,democratic party,elections

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Reporter’s Notebook: Bondi’s binder strategy turns House hearing into political firestorm

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The overstuffed white binders appeared a few moments before Attorney General Pam Bondi exited her motorcade, and strode through the horseshoe entrance of the Rayburn House Office Building.

Advertisement

Roll Call photographer Tom Williams and I stood in the hallway, negotiating our positions for Bondi’s entrance. Williams would position himself on the far side. I slid to the wall nearest the horseshoe entrance. Ali Vitali of MS NOW and Jay O’Brien of ABC worked the sidewall.

A coterie of Bondi’s aides appeared. One bogged down by the massive binders.

BONDI HEARING DEVOLVES INTO CHAOS OF SHOUTS AS AG ACCUSES TOP DEMOCRATS OF ‘THEATRICS’

Advertisement

Attorney General Pam Bondi arrives at the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill and takes questions from Fox News chief congressional correspondent Chad Pergram ahead of a House hearing. (Tom Williams)

«Let her get into the room,» instructed the aide.

I politely reminded the aide that the corridor was an open hallway on Capitol Hill. It wasn’t closed off by the U.S. Capitol Police. So, tossing questions at the Attorney General was fair game.

Advertisement

And, thus began another dance between reporters, security details, the U.S. Capitol Police, aides and Cabinet members when they appear for major Congressional hearings.

At the time, we had no clue what was in the binders. But you couldn’t ignore the sheer size of them.

It’s not uncommon for aides to haul in briefing books for a principal when they testify. However, no one has seen binders like this since Kinko’s was still in business.

Advertisement

The contents of what the binders contained was about to play a central role in Bondi’s testimony to the House Judiciary Committee.

But the first charge of the morning was to query Bondi. There was so much going on. All of which were subjects that the Attorney General could address.

Speaking of files…

Advertisement

Bondi wasn’t there to testify about the Epstein files, per se. But Democrats – and one Republican – would make the Justice Department’s release of partially redacted documents the focus of the hearing. So there was plenty to ask Bondi about that.

DOJ’S EPSTEIN DISCLOSURE DRAWS FIRE FOR WEBSITE GLITCHES, MISSING DOCUMENTS, REDACTIONS

Chad Pergram asks Attorney General Pam Bondi questions before Capitol Hill hearing

Attorney General Pam Bondi arrives at the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill and takes questions from Fox News chief congressional correspondent Chad Pergram ahead of a House hearing. (Tom Williams)

However, there were overnight developments from Arizona. Authorities detained a person near the Mexico border in connection with the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie. What Bondi might know about the FBI’s role in this was worth a question. 

Advertisement

Then, there was a cryptic alert that officials were shutting off the airport in El Paso to all air traffic for ten days. Was there a threat of terrorism? Something about cartels? Finally, a story broke overnight that the Justice Department sought to indict six Democratic lawmakers for their video telling service members they didn’t have to comply with unlawful orders. A District of Columbia grand jury refused to indict any of them.

So the press corps waited for Bondi and her security detail to breeze through the door. We’d have about a minute to pepper her with questions as she walked from the horseshoe entrance to a back anteroom.

Reporters must be strategic with such brief «walk-and-talks.» Rapid, Gatling gun-like questions. Succinct. Straight to the point. And agile enough to skip to the next line of inquiry if the figure arriving on Capitol Hill doesn’t answer or gives a brief response.

Advertisement

In another universe, I may have started with Epstein. But the Nancy Guthrie story has consumed the nation for weeks now. There was a development overnight. Nearly every story on the planet always occupies a lane somewhere on Capitol Hill. The Nancy Guthrie saga was no exception.

I had positioned myself on the inside track as we walked down the hall. Able to sidle up close to Bondi as she moved through the building.

«Madam Attorney General, any comment about the investigation of Guthrie? Any update on that right now?» I began, getting to Bondi first.

Advertisement

«Yeah, I can’t talk about that now. Praying for Savannah and her family,» replied Bondi.

Check. Moving on.

«What happened in El Paso? Why did they close off El Paso? Is that something you don’t know about? Or you just can’t comment?» I asked.

Advertisement

«I cant discuss it,» responded Bondi.

EPSTEIN FILES EXPLODE OPEN AS DOJ DETAILS DISCOVERY OF POWERFUL FIGURES AND MORE THAN 1,200 VICTIMS

Attorney General Pam Bondi testifying at a hearing while a group of people stands to the left.

Attorney General Pam Bondi testifies before a House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Feb. 11, 2026, in Washington, as Jeffrey Epstein survivors, stand left. (Tom Brenner/AP Photo)

Then, the main event.

Advertisement

«And what about the Epstein files? A lot of members have been upset that some of these files have not been fully unredacted. What do you say to that?» I inquired.

«We’re going to discuss that today,» answered Bondi.

I backed off to allow my colleagues a chance to pose questions.

Advertisement

«But why was certain information redacted that’s against the nature of the law? Why was certain information redacted that’s against the law?» asked Vitali.

No response.

So I tagged back in, returning to the initial lines of questioning.

Advertisement

«Did you get any updates overnight on the Guthrie investigation? Were they keeping you informed overnight on that? And when did you first find out about the El Paso situation? When did you first hear about the El Paso situation, Madam Attorney General?»

Bondi was silent.

The scrum processed down the hall, camera operators and reporters bumping all over one another, edging backwards. A semi-blob of security personnel slightly shielded Bondi.

Advertisement

But the end was near. The throng approached the backdoor to the Judiciary Committee. Bondi would soon turn right and disappear inside.

Just enough time for one final topic.

«What about the attempt to prosecute the six lawmakers? Any comment on that failed grand jury indictment?» I hollered.

Advertisement

«I’ll refer that to U.S. Attorney Pirro,» replied Bondi, referring to U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeannine Pirro, who tried to indict the six.

HOW PAM BONDI AND THE DEMOCRATS TURNED A HEARING INTO HYSTERIA, RIGHT IN FRONT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S VICTIMS

Epstein and Maxwell

The Department of Justice released a trove of Epstein documents on Dec. 19 following President Trump’s signature on the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November 2025.  (Joe Schildhorn/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images)

«Do you know why that went wrong?» I asked.

Advertisement

But that was it. The shot clock expired.

Bondi ignored the question, turning right with her security detail and retreating into the anteroom.

When he hosted Meet the Press on NBC, late host Tim Russert would sometimes boast that they had the Vice President or Secretary of State «for the whole hour.»

Advertisement

The exchanges with Bondi were a fraction of that, consuming a meager one minute and three seconds. From 9:42:03 am et until 9:43:06 am et. There was efficient questioning. And Bondi fielded the questions. But there wasn’t a lot which advanced any of the stories. Still, it’s important to pose the questions and get the exchanges on camera. That made it a productive exercise. Sometimes the Capitol press corps never even sees the big witnesses arrive. Or if we do, they don’t even respond to questions.

The group of aides ducked into the Judiciary Committee suite, one aide lugging the ginormous binders like a stack of Christmas presents.

These binders were about to become the most famous folios in American politics since former Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) proclaimed he had «binders full of women» during a 2012 debate with President Obama.

Advertisement

The hearing would start a few moments later, carried live on multiple TV networks. The purpose of the binders soon became clear. Each binder contained dossiers on every single Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. Bondi would turn to a specific section in each binder, mining for barbs to lob back at Democrats on the dais. Sometimes about their voting history. Sometimes about a law enforcement or immigration issue in their district. Bondi frequently lashed Democrats – and Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) – with ad hominem attacks. She derided Massie as a «failed politician.» She called Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), the top Democrat on the panel «a washed-up, loser lawyer.»

US Representative Thomas Massie questions US Attorney General Pam Bondi

US Representatives Thomas Massie, Republican from Kentucky, questions US Attorney General Pam Bondi before a House Judiciary Committee hearing on «Oversight of the Department of Justice» on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on February 11, 2026. (ROBERTO SCHMIDT / AFP via Getty)

Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) tried to bait Bondi, asking her to «give me your best» bit of opposition research. The Florida Democrat would then grade what Bondi’s staff concocted.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

The hearing devolved into five hours of shouting, screaming and mayhem. One of the most chaotic, cacophonous hearings in recent memory. The spectacle spoke volumes.

All of which could fill a stack of overstuffed binders.

Advertisement

politics,congress,pam bondi,house of representatives politics,justice department,jeffrey epstein

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Iran regime accused of killing 19 Christians in anti-regime protests as persecution continues: watchdog

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Islamic Republic of Iran’s atrocities against demonstrators opposed to the regime has reportedly resulted in security forces killing at least 19 Iranian Christians, according to Article 18, an organization that promotes religious freedom in Iran.

Advertisement

Article 18 reported on Feb. 9 that «The total number of Christians confirmed to have been killed during the protests is at least 19, including members of Iran’s recognized (Armenians and Assyrians) and unrecognized (converts) communities.»

According to the Article 18 statement, the Islamic Republic’s «brutal response to last month’s mass demonstrations» resulted in the security forces murdering Iranian Christians Nader Mohammadi, 35, and Zahra Arjomandi, 51, who were both shot dead on Jan. 8 in separate protests 1,000 miles apart.

INSIDE TRUMP’S IRAN WARNING — AND THE UNEXPECTED PAUSE THAT FOLLOWED

Advertisement

Iranians gather while blocking a street during a protest in Tehran, Iran on Jan. 9, 2026.   (MAHSA / Middle East Images / AFP via Getty Images)

Mohammadi was the father of three young children, and was killed in Babol in northern Iran. Arjomandi, who was a mother of two children, died in her son’s arms on the Persian Gulf island of Qeshm, in southern Iran, noted Article 18.

The Iranian Christian website Mohabat News stated that regime security forces refused to release Arjomandi’s body for six days. Mohabat reported that her body was only released for burial under «strict security measures», which included a media blackout and prohibiting a memorial service.

Advertisement

Mansour Borji, the executive director for Article 18, told Fox News Digital that, «Today, Christians, like millions of other Iranians, seek the freedom and justice that they have been denied for nearly five decades, and they know well that this comes at a price. Every year many Christians are arrested and imprisoned under torturous conditions for practicing their right to religious freedom, where a simple act like praying together in house-churches seems like an act of civil disobedience.»

IRAN WILL RETALIATE ‘WITH EVERYTHING WE HAVE’ IF US ATTACKS, SENIOR DIPLOMAT WARNS

Iranian police on the scene as people celebrate the ceasefire

Armed NOPO special police units are on the scene as Iranians take to the streets in the downtown Enghelab (Revolution) Square in Tehran, Iran on June 24, 2025. (Negar Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

He continued, «Our organization considers the Islamic Republic’s massacre of all peaceful protesters a crime against humanity that should not go unpunished. There must be an end to the impunity that, for far too long, has enabled this regime to commit crimes like at home and abroad. Branding peaceful protesters as ‘terrorists,’ and Christians that are persecuted every year as ‘Zionist mercenaries,’ is nothing but scapegoating.»

Advertisement

He warned that «The Islamic Republic’s regime has, since its inception, demonstrated all traits of a totalitarian state. Most Iranians have now come to realize that their fundamental rights have been taken away from them, including the freedom to choose one’s own religion or belief, political self-determination and even their lifestyle choices. Christians were some of the earliest to experience this, when an Anglican priest and convert to Christianity, Rev. Arastoo Sayyah, was killed in his church office less than 200 hours after the 1979 revolution.»

A comprehensive 2025 report titled, «The Tip of the Iceberg» about the persecution of Iranian Christians was released by Article 18 in collaboration with Open Doors, Christian Solidarity Worldwide and Middle East Concern.

A female Iranian Christian lights candle at the Saint Mary Chaldean- Assyrian Catholic church, on the Christmas eve, in downtown Tehran, Iran, Monday, Dec. 24, 2012. Iran's constitution gives protected status to Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians, but many religious minorities sense growing pressures from the Islamic state. Iran has claimed as a point of pride that it makes space for other religions. It reserves parliament seats for Jewish and Christian lawmakers and permits churches, Roman Catholic, Armenian Orthodox and others, as well as synagogues and Zoroastrian temples that are under sporadic watch by authorities. Religious celebrations are allowed, but no political messages or overtones are tolerated. In past years, authorities have staged arrests on Christians and other religious minorities. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

A female Iranian Christian lights a candle at the Saint Mary Chaldean-Assyrian Catholic Church, on Christmas Eve, in downtown Tehran, Iran on Dec. 24, 2012.  (AP)

According to the «The Tip of the Iceberg» report, Mohammad Nasirpour, the deputy prosecutor of Tehran and head of the 33rd District Prosecutor’s office, stated in his indictment against four Iranian Christians on June 2022: «Armenian and Assyrian Christians in the Protestant denomination, with their evangelical nature and mission to Christianize Iran, are perceived as a security threat to the Islamic Revolution, aimed at undermining the Islamic foundation of the Islamic Republic. It could be said that Persian-speaking evangelical movements are supported by fundamentalist evangelical Christians and Zionists.» 

Advertisement

According to a Feb. 10 report on the website of Christianity Today, Iranian Christians want President Trump to intervene to stop the Ayatollah’s regime from continuing with its massacre of Iranians.

RUBIO REVOKES IRANIAN OFFICIALS’ US TRAVEL PRIVILEGES OVER DEADLY PROTEST CRACKDOWN KILLING THOUSANDS

«That’s probably one of the most frustrating aspects of the whole situation right now,» said Shahrokh Afshar, founder of Fellowship of Iranian Christians. «Everyone was hoping he would do something,» Afshar told the outlet after the Iranian authorities killed thousands of protesters in January, according to some estimates.

Advertisement
Burning cars line a street in Tehran as thick smoke rises during unrest.

Cars burn in a street during a protest over the collapse of the currency’s value in Tehran, Iran, Jan. 8, 2026. (Stringer/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS)

Fox News Digital has reported over the decades on the Islamic Republic’s high-intensity persecution of Iranian Christians in the wake of the growing popularity of Christianity in the Muslim-majority country. Iran’s regime targets diverse groups of Christians, including Evangelicals and Catholics. In 2017, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) arrested two Christians – a mother and her son – as part of a brutal crackdown on Catholicism in the country’s West Azerbaijan Province.

STATE DEPARTMENT DEMANDS IRAN HALT EXECUTION OF 19-YEAR-OLD WRESTLING STAR AS IOC REMAINS SILENT

The family’s bibles and literature on Christian theology were also seized during the raid.

Advertisement

The United States State Department has designated Iran as a «Country of Particular Concern» (CPC)» because the Islamic regime has «engaged in or tolerated particularly severe violations of religious freedom» with respect to violations of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998.

The Iranian regime -controlled statistical center of Iran claims there are 117,700 Christians of recognized denominations as of the 2016 census, according to the most recent U.S. State Department report on the plight of Iranian Christians. 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

However, the State Department noted that, «The Christian advocacy NGO Article 18 estimates there are 500,000 to 800,000 Christians in the country, while the Christian advocacy NGO Open Doors International estimates the number is 1.24 million. Christian NGOs report many Christians are converts from Islam or other recognized faiths.» The population of Iran is roughly 92 million.



iran,christianity religion,persecutions,world protests

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

En Múnich, los líderes europeos se preguntan si podrán volver a confiar en EE.UU.

Published

on


Había mucho más por venir.

Al año siguiente, el presidente Donald Trump impuso aranceles a los productos europeos.

Advertisement

Presionó para poner fin a la guerra en Ucrania en términos mayoritariamente favorables al presidente ruso, Vladimir Putin, y amenazó con arrebatar Groenlandia a Dinamarca por cualquier medio.

MÚNICH — Cuando el vicepresidente J.D. Vance dijo en la Conferencia de Seguridad de Múnich el año pasado que los aliados europeos de Estados Unidos se estaban destruyendo a sí mismos con la inmigración y excluyendo injustamente a la extrema derecha del poder, fue un shock para la alianza transatlántica.

Se burló de los líderes europeos en un discurso intimidatorio en Suiza, declarando que Europa no sería nada sin Estados Unidos.

Advertisement

La amistad que unió a Occidente durante tres cuartos de siglo, desde la Segunda Guerra Mundial, se ha desmoronado vertiginosamente.

Esto ha provocado que los líderes europeos se muestren más cautelosos —y en algunos casos, más desafiantes— hacia Estados Unidos, mientras se preparan para reunirse de nuevo en Múnich, a partir del viernes, para la mayor reunión anual de políticos y funcionarios de seguridad de Europa.

Diplomáticos y jefes de Estado de todo el continente afirman que ya no esperan que las relaciones con Estados Unidos vuelvan a la normalidad pre-Trump, incluso después de que este deje el cargo.

Advertisement

Han intensificado sus esfuerzos para reducir su dependencia militar y económica de Estados Unidos, al tiempo que continúan cortejando al presidente con halagos para mantener su influencia sobre Ucrania y otros asuntos globales.

“Las relaciones transatlánticas han cambiado, y nadie en esta sala lo dice con más pesar que yo”, declaró la semana pasada el canciller alemán Friedrich Merz, quien inaugurará la conferencia de Múnich con un discurso.

“Pero la nostalgia y el recuerdo de tiempos mejores no nos ayudarán”.

Advertisement

La pregunta que muchos europeos se plantean es si podrán volver a confiar realmente en Estados Unidos y qué deben hacer si no pueden hacerlo.

“Por supuesto, hemos sufrido una grave pérdida de confianza, sin duda”, declaró Wolfgang Ischinger, presidente de la conferencia de seguridad, en una entrevista.

“Claro que la confianza se puede reconstruir. Pero todos sabemos que perderla es más fácil que reconstruirla”.

Advertisement

Preparativos

En un informe previo a la reunión, el personal de la conferencia de seguridad calificó a Trump de «bola de demolición» y de «hombre demoledor» que destruye las normas e instituciones del orden internacional.

El mes pasado, la primera ministra danesa Mette Frederiksen cuestionó cuánto tiempo Estados Unidos seguiría siendo un aliado europeo.

Advertisement

Los funcionarios de la administración no lo ven así.

Afirman que Trump está presionando a Europa para que sea un socio más fuerte y autosuficiente, tras décadas de depender de las tropas estadounidenses y las armas nucleares para garantizar su seguridad nacional.

Matthew Whitaker, embajador de Estados Unidos ante la OTAN, sugirió en Berlín esta semana que la administración veía a Europa como un niño que había crecido y necesitaba encontrar trabajo.

Advertisement

«No pedimos autonomía europea», dijo.

«Pedimos fuerza europea».

Los europeos, sin embargo, hablan de Trump en términos más resignados y urgentes que hace un año.

Advertisement

En ese momento, cuando Vance sorprendió a la multitud en Múnich, que esperaba escuchar sobre el plan de Trump para poner fin rápidamente a la guerra en Ucrania, los líderes europeos intentaron refutarlo.

«¡Esto es inaceptable!», gritó Boris Pistorius, ministro de Defensa alemán, desde el público mientras Vance hablaba.

Más tarde, señaló al vicepresidente desde el escenario de Múnich.

Advertisement

«Si le entendí bien, está comparando las condiciones en algunas partes de Europa con las de los regímenes autoritarios», dijo Pistorius.

«Esta no es la Europa ni la democracia en la que vivo».

Semanas después, los europeos presenciaron cómo Trump y Vance reprendían al presidente ucraniano, Volodymyr Zelensky, en el Despacho Oval.

Advertisement

En diciembre, leyeron la Estrategia de Seguridad Nacional actualizada de la Casa Blanca, que advertía que Europa se enfrentaba a una «borradura de la civilización», haciendo eco del lenguaje de los partidos políticos europeos de extrema derecha.

Nathalie Tocci, directora del Instituto de Asuntos Internacionales, un grupo de investigación en Roma, dijo que esos acontecimientos y el discurso de Vance en Munich fueron esclarecedores.

“Esos tres momentos indicaron que no estamos en un juego de desenredo, desapego, desapego o incluso abandono”, dijo, “sino que realmente estamos en un escenario de traición”.

Advertisement

Postura

Los europeos han cuestionado la estrategia de Trump de menospreciar a Europa cuando Estados Unidos necesita su apoyo para competir contra Rusia y China. Jan Techau, ex funcionario de defensa alemán y analista del Grupo Eurasia, declaró:

«Es una completa locura deshacerse de un imperio y de tus mejores aliados, distanciarlos justo cuando los necesitas».

Advertisement

Los líderes europeos a menudo han buscado apaciguar a Trump halagando su ego y concediéndole pequeñas victorias.

Se comprometieron a aumentar el gasto militar dentro de la OTAN, uno de los objetivos a largo plazo de Trump.

Lo calificaron como el único líder del mundo capaz de negociar la paz en Ucrania, en un esfuerzo por alejarlo de la influencia de Putin.

Advertisement

Firmaron un acuerdo comercial apresurado para limitar el daño causado por los aranceles amenazados por Trump.

El mes pasado, prometieron reforzar la defensa del Ártico por parte de la OTAN en un aparente acuerdo de mutuo acuerdo para frenar los intentos de Trump de arrebatar Groenlandia a Dinamarca, un aliado de la OTAN.

La crisis de Groenlandia parece haber llevado a Europa a la fase de aceptación de su dolor, comprendiendo que la tradicional dependencia de Estados Unidos ya no es posible ni siquiera estratégicamente sabia, dijo Ivo H. Daalder, ex embajador estadounidense ante la OTAN.

Advertisement

“Europa no puede confiar en Estados Unidos hoy ni en el futuro, a menos que Estados Unidos adopte un comportamiento diseñado para recuperar esa confianza”, afirmó Daalder.

“Y es posible, si no probable, que Europa nunca vuelva a confiar en nosotros. La relación entre Estados Unidos y Europa nunca volverá a ser como antes”.

El público europeo parece pensar en términos similares.

Advertisement

La última encuesta Cluster17, realizada en enero para la revista francesa Le Grand Continent, a 7498 personas de siete países europeos, fue sorprendente.

Una gran mayoría apoyó el envío de tropas europeas a defender Groenlandia si las tensiones allí se intensifican.

El 51 % afirmó que Trump era un enemigo de Europa; solo el 8 % lo consideró un amigo.

Advertisement

La mayoría de los líderes europeos aún afirman que es necesario preservar la alianza transatlántica.

Funcionarios alemanes sugirieron esta semana que Merz aprovecharía su discurso de Múnich para desarrollar una nueva visión del papel de Europa en la alianza, basada en un mayor gasto militar, un mayor crecimiento económico y la profundización de los vínculos con otros socios, como India, África y partes de Oriente Medio.

Ischinger dijo que esperaba que esto iniciara dos procesos:

Advertisement

reparar la relación entre Estados Unidos y Europa y presionar a Europa para que actúe concretamente para reducir su dependencia de Estados Unidos.

El secretario de Estado, Marco Rubio, el funcionario estadounidense de mayor rango que asistirá a la conferencia, tiene previsto hablar el sábado por la mañana.

Funcionarios de toda Europa desconocían esta semana qué diría.

Advertisement

No estaba claro si Rubio tenía previsto reunirse en la conferencia con representantes del partido ultraderechista Alternativa para Alemania (AfD), invitados tras haber sido excluidos de conferencias recientes.

Varios funcionarios europeos dijeron en privado que no esperaban una sorpresa por parte de un Rubio más indulgente, al nivel de Vance del año pasado.

Pero hoy en día, no podían descartarlo.

Advertisement

Rubio tiene previsto viajar desde Múnich a Hungría y Eslovaquia, dos países liderados por partidos populistas muy críticos con la Unión Europea y cercanos a Rusia.

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias