Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

DHS shutdown explained: Who works without pay, what happens to airports and disaster response

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A partial government shutdown is all but certain after Senate Democrats rejected attempts to fund the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) offered by Republicans on Thursday afternoon.

Advertisement

But it will not look like the record-long 43-day full shutdown that paralyzed Congress last year, nor will it look like the shorter four-day partial shutdown that hit Capitol Hill earlier this month. That’s because Congress has already funded roughly 97% of the government through the end of fiscal year (FY) 2026 on Sept. 30.

When the clock strikes 12:01 a.m. on Saturday, Feb. 14, just DHS will be affected by a lapse in its federal funding. While it’s a vastly smaller scale than other recent fiscal fights, it will still have an impact on a broad range of issues given DHS’s wide jurisdiction.

SCHUMER, DEMS CHOOSE PARTIAL SHUTDOWN AS NEGOTIATIONS HIT IMPASSE

Advertisement

A Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officer stands near a security checkpoint. (Michael Ciaglo / Getty Images)

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

Disruptions to the TSA, whose agents are responsible for security checks at nearly 440 airports across the country, could perhaps be the most impactful part of the partial shutdown to Americans’ everyday lives.

Acting Administrator Ha Nguyen McNeill told lawmakers at a hearing on Wednesday that around 95% of TSA employees — roughly 61,000 people — are deemed essential and will be forced to work without pay in the event of a shutdown.

Advertisement

McNeill said many TSA agents were still recovering from the effects of the recent 43-day shutdown. «We heard reports of officers sleeping in their cars at airports to save money on gas, selling their blood and plasma, and taking on second jobs to make ends meet,» she said.

TSA paychecks due to be issued on March 3 could see agents getting reduced pay depending on the length of the shutdown. Agents would not be at risk of missing a full paycheck until March 17.

If that happens, however, Americans could see delays or even cancellations at the country’s busiest airports as TSA agents are forced to call out of work and get second jobs to make ends meet.

Advertisement

SHUTDOWN CLOCK TICKS AS SCHUMER, DEMOCRATS DIG IN ON DHS FUNDING DEMANDS

Coast Guard

The U.S. Coast Guard is the only branch of the Armed Forces under DHS rather than the Department of War, and as such would likely see reduced operations during a shutdown.

That includes a pause in training for pilots, air crews, and boat crews until funding is restarted.

Advertisement

Admiral Thomas Allan, Coast Guard Vice Commandant, warned lawmakers that it would have to «suspend all missions, except those for national security or the protection of life and property.»

A lapse in its funding would also result in suspended pay for 56,000 active duty, reserve, and civilian personnel, which Allan warned would negatively affect morale and recruitment efforts.

Chuck Schumer speaking at podium

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks at a press conference following the passage of government funding bills, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 30, 2026.  (Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Secret Service

The U.S. Secret Service (USSS), which is critical to protecting the president and key members of the administration, is also under DHS’s purview. 

Advertisement

While its core functions would be largely unaffected by a shutdown, some 94% of the roughly 8,000 people the service employs would be forced to work without pay until the standoff is resolved.

Deputy USSS Director Matthew Quinn also warned that a shutdown could also hurt the progress being made to improve the service in the wake of the July 2024 assassination attempt against President Donald Trump.

«The assassination attempt on President Trump’s life brought forward hard truths for our agency and critical areas for improvement — air, space, security, communications and IT infrastructure, hiring and retention training, overarching technological improvements,» Quinn said. «We are today on the cusp of implementing generational change for our organization. A shutdown halts our reforms and undermines the momentum that we, including all of you, have worked so hard to build together.»

Advertisement

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

ICE operations would largely go on unimpeded during a shutdown, despite Democrats’ outrage at the agency being the main driver of the current standoff.

Nearly 20,000 of ICE’s roughly 21,000 employees are deemed «essential» and therefore must work without pay, according to DHS shutdown guidance issued in September 2025.

But even though it’s the center of Democrats’ funding protest, ICE already received an injection of some $75 billion over the course of four years from Trump’s One Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). It means many of its core functions retain some level of funding even during a shutdown.

Advertisement

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)

CISA is responsible for defending critical U.S. sectors like transportation, healthcare, and energy from foreign and domestic threats.

The agency would be forced to reduce operations to an active threat mitigation status and activities «essential to protecting and protecting life and property,» according to Acting CISA Director Madhu Gottumukkala.

That means a shutdown would significantly reduce CISA’s capacity to proactively monitor for potential threats from foreign adversaries.

Advertisement

«We will be on the defensive, reactive as opposed to being proactive, and strategic in terms of how we will be able to combat those adversaries,» Gottumukkala said.

Operations like «cyber response, security assessments, stakeholder engagements, training, exercises, and special event planning» would all be impacted, he said.

Secret Service outside the White House

A U.S. Secret Service police officer stands outside the White House the day after President Donald Trump announced U.S. military strikes on nuclear sites in Iran on June 22, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

FEMA, one of the largest recipients of congressional funding under DHS, would also likely see reduced operations if a shutdown went on for long enough.

Advertisement

The bright spot for the agency is that past congressional appropriations have left its Disaster Relief Fund (DRF), the main coffer used to respond to natural disasters throughout the U.S., with roughly $7 billion.

The DRF could become a serious problem if the DHS shutdown goes on for more than a month, however, or in the event of an unforeseen «catastrophic disaster,» an official warned.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

FEMA is also currently working through a backlog of responses to past natural disasters, progress that Associate Administrator of the Office of Response and Recovery Gregg Phillips said could be interrupted during a shutdown.

«In the 45 days I’ve been here…we have spent $3 billion in 45 days on 5,000 projects,» Phillips said. «We’re going as fast as we can. We’re committed to reducing the backlog. I can’t go any faster than we actually are. And if this lapses, that’s going to stop.»

Advertisement

politics,congress,government shutdown,homeland security

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Modern Love: Un apagón hizo que lo nuestro fuera posible

Published

on



Cuando estaba penosamente soltero entre los 20 y los 30 años y vivía en un garage reconvertido en Chicago, me preocupaba la primera impresión que una posible pareja se llevaría de mí.

La puerta trasera de la cochera era mi puerta principal, lo que significaba que tenía que guiar a la persona con la que tenía una cita por el callejón, pasar junto a los contenedores de basura y atravesar el olor a podrido para llegar a mi casa.

Advertisement

En verano, los olores a veces incluso nos seguían al interior.

Durante un tiempo después de mudarme, la gente llamaba a mi puerta pensando que yo era el inquilino anterior, que al parecer había sido un traficante de drogas local.

No fue exactamente el nuevo comienzo romántico que había imaginado tras una ruptura.

Advertisement

Soy artista y profesor, y la primera habitación de la cochera era mi estudio, lleno de obras en curso, lo que he llegado a considerar un tipo diferente de basura, una muestra visual de mis inseguridades y tendencias neuróticas.

Una metáfora viviente de todo lo que se agitaba en mi mundo privado.

Cuando traía a casa a una cita, siempre me apresuraba a atravesar esa primera habitación para llegar a la segunda, a fin de evitar preguntas innecesarias o posibles retrocesos antes de desvestirme y poner manos a la obra.

Advertisement

Kevin fue uno de los primeros hombres a los que permití entrar en mi espacio.

Era un analista de datos bienintencionado que realmente quería saber a qué me dedicaba.

Cuando echó un vistazo a mi estudio, frunció el ceño.

Advertisement

“¿Este es tu trabajo?”, me preguntó.

“¿Esto es lo que haces todo el día cuando la mayoría de la gente está trabajando?”.

Me reí, pero me morí un poco por dentro.

Advertisement

Durante mucho tiempo, luché con el temor de que si alguien solo veía el callejón, la basura y lo extraño del espacio, asumiría que yo era un perdedor.

Un tipo de unos 30 años que vivía en una cochera reconvertida detrás de un contenedor de basura.

No tenía un trabajo ascendente.

Advertisement

No tenía una narrativa limpia.

Hablo mucho de esto con mis alumnos, de cómo ser artista puede resultar genial a los 20 años, pero a medida que envejeces, el encanto desaparece.

La gente deja de preguntarte por tu proceso y empieza a preguntarse si has fracasado.

Advertisement

Si te quedas el tiempo suficiente, empiezan a darte premios por resistencia, por sobrevivir al estilo de vida.

Pero aún así: ¿por qué alguien que roza los 50, como yo, elegiría vivir en un callejón?

Tardé años en comprender cuál era el ímpetu por el que hacía arte, y para quién.

Advertisement

Cuando era estudiante de posgrado en la Escuela del Instituto de Arte de Chicago, en una presentación de grupo el primer día, todo el mundo pronunciaba sus pulidas frases iniciales.

“Mi obra explora las estructuras posmodernas de la identidad feminista” o “Me interesan las implicaciones del espacio minimalista en el paisaje”.

Cuando llegó mi turno, dije:

Advertisement

“Hago arte porque quiero gustarle a la gente”.

Mi instructor hizo una pausa y dijo:

“Esa es la primera respuesta sincera a esa pregunta”.

Advertisement

Ese anhelo —gustar, no necesariamente ser comprendido— nunca me abandonó del todo.

Sobre todo en lo que respecta a las citas.

El anhelo de aceptación incondicional no se desvanece en el plano personal solo porque el profesional empiece a tener mejor aspecto.

Advertisement

Con el paso de los años, a través de una serie de contactos perdidos y malas citas, arraigó un miedo más silencioso:

Demasiado intenso. Demasiado, bueno, demasiado yo.

En distintos momentos, intenté dar sentido a mi ansia de amor y a mi necesidad creativa de soledad mirando a los demás.

Advertisement

Busqué refugio en mi tía Katie, mi madrina y monja ursulina, que hablaba del empoderamiento y la liberación que se encuentran en el celibato.

Había consuelo en su devoción, en la sensación de que la soledad podía ser sagrada, no vergonzosa.

Pero somos humanos; yo era humano.

Advertisement

Y también cachondo, aunque anhelaba algo más que una conexión rápida.

Al mismo tiempo, mi terapeuta me dio algunos consejos que me acompañaron durante mis citas y mis largos períodos de soledad.

No todo tiene por qué ser perfecto con la persona con la que sales.

Advertisement

Puedes notar las imperfecciones.

Lo que hacemos en las relaciones es practicar, ensayar e incluso sanar nuestras desconexiones anteriores.

Estar en una relación significa que dos personas siguen apareciendo.

Advertisement

Cuando una persona decide no aparecer, es cuando todo se desvanece.

Así que me dije a mí mismo:

Cuando conocí a Ed, realmente quería que funcionara.

Advertisement

Lo que significaba que temía aún más llevarlo a casa.

Si leía las señales demasiado rápido —el callejón de la basura, sin muebles, virutas de lápices de colores bajo mis uñas—, podría pensar que no tenía mi vida resuelta.

Ed era diez años mayor que yo.

Advertisement

Al principio, supuse que se trataba de una situación de amistad.

Era cálido pero comedido.

Puse su nombre en mi teléfono como “Ed, el banquero”.

Advertisement

La falta de apellido lo mantenía informal.

Lo poco que había en juego facilitaba la gestión de mis sentimientos.

La noche que lo llevé a casa, Ed cumplía 50 años.

Advertisement

No había planeado cargar con ese tipo de presión tan pronto, pero se acercaba Halloween y pensé:

¿Por qué no ponerme un disfraz y fingir que era lo bastante adulto para mantener una relación adulta?

Sugirió que fuéramos a comer tacos a su chacinería favorita de Pilsen.

Advertisement

Al parecer, le regalé un poema hablado como regalo de cumpleaños; me carcome la vergüenza al pensar en lo que pude haber dicho.

Cuando nos acercábamos a mi casa, le conté lo de siempre.

El callejón, la cochera reconvertida, el contenedor y el descargo de responsabilidad:

Advertisement

Estos sitios son difíciles de encontrar, ¿sabes? Porque este tipo me gustaba de verdad. Y estaba esperando que me juzgara.

No obstante, esa noche hubo un apagón en todo Chicago. Intenté utilizarlo como pretexto —quizá deberíamos dejarlo para otro día—, pero él dijo que no le importaba.

Nos abrimos paso por el callejón en la oscuridad, y bromeó: “No vas a matarme, ¿verdad?”.

Advertisement

Aquella noche, en la oscuridad, algo cambió.

Sin luces, sin el resplandor de ser observado por alguien nuevo, no me sentí expuesto.

Entramos a trompicones en mi casa y nos acomodamos sin rituales, sin preguntas sobre el arte ni cumplidos forzados por su parte, ni explicaciones a medias sobre por qué vivía así.

Advertisement

Solo había oscuridad y tranquilidad.

Aquella noche ocurrió algo que no esperaba:

En la tranquilidad, en la oscuridad, con alguien a quien de repente no creía tener que impresionar, sentí algo que nunca antes había asociado con el amor.

Advertisement

Tardé años en comprender que los pensamientos acelerados, las vueltas de estómago y la necesidad de actuar que solía interpretar como amor eran en realidad mi cuerpo intentando avisarme.

Era mi sistema nervioso que gritaba:

Recordé los largos viajes en tren a casa durante mis años en Brooklyn, llorando tras una pelea con mi primer amante.

Advertisement

En esos momentos me preguntaba:

¿Por qué no era yo suficiente?

Más tarde pasó a mi siguiente y breve relación.

Advertisement

También aspirante a artista, me señalaba las manchas en los pantalones de jean de una pincelada accidental cuando salíamos a cenar, y sugería que aquel desastre no era encantador, ni presentable.

Seguía confundiendo la ansiedad con mariposas.

La intensidad me resultaba familiar.

Advertisement

La confusión parecía magnética.

Sin embargo, Ed no me confundía.

No me emocionó con distanciamiento ni me mantuvo adivinando.

Advertisement

Escuchaba, se quedaba, respondía con prontitud a mis mensajes de texto.

Se acomodó en el espacio sin empequeñecerlo.

Por eso todo se volvió tan real.

Advertisement

No fueron los tacos, ni el sexo, ni la luz de las velas.

Era estar con alguien que no hacía que mi cuerpo quisiera salir disparado.

Nos protegíamos el uno al otro.

Advertisement

Por la mañana, cuando volvió la luz, nada había cambiado en mi estudio.

Era el mismo desastre, el mismo yo, ahora totalmente visible.

Pero Ed se quedó, y lleva volviendo a mí más de 10 años.

Advertisement

Sigue habiendo demasiado desorden.

Los dibujos cubren el suelo y las paredes.

Apenas hay una línea entre donde acaba el trabajo y donde vivo.

Advertisement

Pero algo en mí ha cambiado.

Los contenedores de basura siguen delante de mi puerta.

Pero ya no me preocupo por eso ni me disculpo por mi vida, o al menos no tanto.

Advertisement

He aprendido que no se trata de arreglar las cosas.

No se trata de ocultar el desorden ni de alisar los bordes.

Se trata de dejar que todo conviva.

Advertisement

Creo que así es el amor.

No es una actuación ni un espectáculo.

Simplemente es estar con alguien que te hace sentir seguro en la luz y en la oscuridad.

Advertisement

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Pope Leo says he ‘can’t comment’ on 20-year sentence of Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Pope Leo XIV this week said he «can’t» comment on the 20-year sentence imposed on a democracy activist in Hong Kong. 

Advertisement

«I can’t comment,» the American-born Leo told EWTN News, which covers Catholic news globally, while speaking to reporters in Italy. 

He added, «Let’s pray for less hatred and more peace and work for authentic dialogue. God bless you all.» 

Hong Kong publisher and democracy activist Jimmy Lai, who is a converted Catholic, was sentenced to 20 years by Beijing last month for violating their 2020 national security law, which U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called «unjust and tragic.»

Advertisement

Pope Leo XIV this week said he «can’t» comment on the 20-year sentence imposed on a democracy activist in Hong Kong.  (Christopher Furlong/Getty Images; Anthony Kwan/Getty Images)

«The conviction shows the world that Beijing will go to extraordinary lengths to silence those who advocate fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong,» Rubio said in a statement. «The United States urges the authorities to grant Mr. Lai humanitarian parole.»

The 78-year-old founded the now-closed Hong Kong-based Apple Daily in 1995, while the island was still under British rule. 

Advertisement

Lai’s sentence closed one of the country’s most consequential national security cases since Beijing imposed the sweeping new law in 2020 in the wake of months-long anti-Chinese Communist Party protests in 2019, which were sparked by fears Beijing was eroding Hong Kong’s promised autonomy. 

Jimmy Lai resting his chin on his hands

Lai has already been in custody since 2020.  (Anthony Wallace/AFP via Getty Images)

They were followed by a sweeping security crackdown that criminalized dissent and reshaped the city’s legal system.

CHINA PHONY CONVICTION OF JIMMY LAI IS A WARNING

Advertisement

Lai had been arrested several times during the 2019 protests, and he was detained at his home in 2020. His newspaper was also raided at the time and closed. 

He was found guilty in December of attempting to undermine national security. 

Free Jimmy posters in LA

Jimmy Lai supporters in Los Angeles last month.  (Apu Gomes/Getty Images)

President Donald Trump said in December that he had personally urged Chinese President Xi Jinping to release Lai. 

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«I spoke to President Xi about it, and I asked to consider his release,» Trump said. «He’s not well, he’s an older man, and he’s not well, so I did put that request out. We’ll see what happens.»

Advertisement

Related Article

Jimmy Lai is risking everything for democracy. We can't ignore what China is doing



pope leo xiv,china,world,hong kong

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

After the strikes, how would the US secure Iran’s enriched uranium?

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

When War Secretary Pete Hegseth was asked recently whether U.S. forces would ever move to secure enriched uranium reportedly stored at Iran’s Isfahan nuclear complex, he declined to say, citing operational security.

Advertisement

The exchange highlighted a question the U.S. and Israel’s air campaign alone cannot answer: even if U.S. strikes degrade Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, who would physically secure the enriched uranium, and how?

Iran is believed to possess a significant stockpile of uranium enriched to 60%, near weapons-grade. That material could theoretically be used in multiple nuclear devices if further refined. 

Moving from 60% to weapons-grade 90% enrichment requires additional processing, and weaponization would involve further technical steps. But analysts say the more immediate issue is physical control of the material itself.

Advertisement

«If the U.S. wants to secure Iran’s nuclear materials, it’s going to require a massive ground operation,» Kelsey Davenport, director of nonproliferation policy at the Arms Control Association, told Fox News Digital.

Davenport said the highly enriched uranium believed to be stored at Isfahan appears to be deeply buried and contained in relatively mobile canisters. Securing it would likely require locating the full stockpile, accessing underground facilities and safely extracting or downblending the material.

Satellite imagery taken on Jan. 30, 2026 shows a new roof over a previously destroyed building at the Natanz nuclear site. (2026 PLANET LABS PBC/Handout via Reuters)

Advertisement

«It’s not even clear the United States knows where all of the uranium is,» she said, noting that the mobility of storage containers raises the possibility that some material could be moved or dispersed.

The administration repeatedly has said preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon remains a central objective of Operation Epic Fury.

«Ultimately, this issue of Iran’s nuclear pursuit and their unwillingness through negotiations to stop it is something President Trump has said for a long time needs to be dealt with,» Hegseth said.

Advertisement

Senior administration officials have argued that Iran sought to build up its ballistic missile arsenal in part to create a deterrent shield — enabling Tehran to continue advancing its nuclear program while discouraging outside intervention.

So far, however, the bulk of U.S. strikes have focused on degrading missile launchers, air defenses and other conventional military targets.

Experts note that dismantling missile systems may reduce Iran’s ability to shield a potential nuclear breakout. But physically controlling enriched uranium itself presents a separate and more complex challenge.

Advertisement
Iran's Natanz uranium enrichment facility before it was hit with US and Israeli strikes.

This photo released on Nov. 5, 2019, by the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran shows centrifuge machines in the Natanz uranium enrichment facility in central Iran.  (Atomic Energy Organization of Iran via AP, File)

Airstrikes versus physical control

Defense officials have acknowledged that degrading nuclear infrastructure from the air is different from safely managing or securing nuclear material. 

Airstrikes can destroy centrifuges, power systems and support buildings. But enriched uranium stored underground may remain intact unless it is physically secured, removed or verifiably downblended.

Striking or extracting nuclear material also carries safety risks that military planners must weigh. 

Advertisement

If storage casks containing uranium hexafluoride gas were compromised, the material could pose chemical toxicity risks to personnel entering the site without proper protective equipment. Analysts say a conventional strike is unlikely to trigger a nuclear detonation, but dispersal of material could create localized hazards and complicate recovery efforts.

Chuck DeVore, a former Reagan-era defense official who worked on nuclear issues, argued that directly targeting the stockpile may not be a priority under current battlefield conditions.

«You don’t want to release the material into the surrounding areas and cause radioactive contamination,» DeVore said, adding that deeply buried facilities are difficult to reach from the air. 

Advertisement

DeVore also downplayed the immediacy of a breakout scenario, arguing that further enrichment, weaponization and delivery would be difficult to execute undetected amid sustained U.S. air operations.

Even if Iran were able to further enrich uranium, he said, assembling a deliverable weapon under active military pressure would present significant technical and operational hurdles.

A map shows nuclear sites in Iran that were struck by the United States during Operation Midnight Hammer.

Trump said that the United States completed a «very successful» strike against Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, saying that Iran’s nuclear enrichment installations have been «obliterated.»  (Fox News)

Still, DeVore acknowledged that long-term control of the uranium would ultimately require a political resolution inside Iran and some form of outside oversight.

Advertisement

What would securing it require?

Nonproliferation experts say securing enriched uranium generally involves more than military force. It requires verified accounting of the material, sustained access to storage sites and either removal or downblending to lower enrichment levels suitable for civilian use.

Davenport said internationally monitored downblending would be the safest option if political conditions allow.

«The IAEA remains the best place to go back into Iran to monitor the sites, to try to track down and account for the enriched uranium,» she said, describing downblending as a relatively straightforward technical process compared to attempting to extract and transport highly enriched material in a contested environment.

Advertisement

Both pathways — physical seizure or internationally monitored reduction — depend on conditions that do not currently exist.

Administration officials argue that dismantling Iran’s missile network weakens Iran’s ability to shield a nuclear breakout and reduces the immediate threat to U.S. forces and regional allies.

But suppressing missiles and controlling enriched uranium are separate challenges.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Destroying infrastructure can slow or disrupt a program. Physically locating, accounting for and securing nuclear material requires sustained access, reliable intelligence and — ultimately — political conditions that allow it.

For now, the administration maintains that Iran will not be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. How the enriched uranium itself would be secured remains a question without a public answer.

Advertisement

Related Article

Iran’s shadowy chemical weapons program draws scrutiny as reports allege use against protesters

war with iran,iran,nuclear proliferation,nuclear disasters

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias